Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CONTENTS VII
Instruments of Influence 89
Diplomacy 89
In Greater Depth: Bargaining and Common Ground 92
Coercion 94
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
VIII CONTENTS
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CONTENTS IX
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
X CONTENTS
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CONTENTS XI
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
XII CONTENTS
G L O S SA RY 437
A UT HO R I N DE X 443
S U BJ E CT I NDE X 449
W O R LD M AP S I NS I DE F R O NT AND B AC K C O VE R
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
PREFACE
World politics is a fascinating subject. It is also a vast and complex subject. Students
of world politics are asked to master, in varying degrees, history, current affairs,
political and economic theory, principles of social science research, and ethics.
Through nine editions, this book has been providing students with the tools they
need to get started on their journey, and this newest edition aims to do the same
for students whose journeys are starting in the second decade of a new century.
World politics is constantly changing, and no one can hope to absorb fully
these changes as they are occurring. We believe that a broad and self-conscious the-
oretical orientation remains the best resource for comprehending and coping with
change, now and in the years ahead. Thus, this book includes a substantial compo-
nent of theory, from both older and newer sources. The study of world politics is
also constantly changing. In recent decades, we have altered the ways we think
about the subject; standards of concept formation, of logic, and of evidence are
markedly different from what they were, and even now they are in a state of flux.
Advances in the study of world politics can be consolidated only when we have the
pedagogical skills and tools to educate the next generation. The consolidation we
have tried for in World Politics is inclusive rather than exclusive. We have sought
to synthesize the best of older traditions with newer approaches.
Students must learn something about how theory is constructed and tested, so
to some extent we deal with the social scientific method and provide some guide-
lines for recognizing well-executed research. We stress the importance of cause-
and-effect statements, encourage a respect for evidence, and help students recognize
the type of statements for which evidence is not altogether relevant. To succeed in a
rapidly changing world as active citizens rather than passive objects of historical
forces, students must develop a good set of basic concepts and questions, a
xiii
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
XIV PREFACE
We have found that certain key theories and concepts help to frame what can
often appear to first-time students of world politics as a jumble of facts, concepts,
and disagreements about the way the world works. Therefore, we introduce three
broad theoretical perspectives at the beginning of the book—realism, liberalism,
and radicalism—and we return to these frequently throughout the book to help
students realize that most of the major fundamental debates in world politics are
not erratic or haphazard, but usually reflect competing worldviews.
As with the three previous editions, this tenth edition includes many concepts
and examples from game theory—many more, indeed, than most other books of
this sort. Rational choice analysis is now a common approach to the study of world
politics, and our teaching experience suggests that game theory can be an effective
pedagogical tool for communicating key concepts and puzzles. We generally present
this material by way of a sidebar feature called “In Greater Depth.” These analyti-
cal boxes allow us to lay out the basics of the rational choice approach in the con-
text of examples related to the subject matter of the chapter in which they appear.
By the time students have finished the book, they will also have had an introductory
minicourse in the application of rational choice concepts to issues in world politics.
Another benefit of the sidebar feature is that it makes the book more adaptable to
different styles of instruction. If an instructor prefers that students treat this material
as optional reading—or that students bypass it altogether—this is easily done with-
out any loss of continuity in regard to the main text.
The tenth edition of World Politics introduces a new sidebar feature called
“Ethics and World Politics,” in which we explore at greater length both moral
and legal issues in international politics. We have found that students enjoy the
challenge of struggling with controversial and ambiguous normative questions,
and we seek to encourage this by highlighting several such questions in these ana-
lytical boxes. The tenth edition also includes expanded chapters on international
law and international organization, incorporating new material on the United
Nations, collective security, and the responsibility to protect. The chapter on
environmental challenges and responses now contains a discussion of the global
environmental justice. As always, all figures and tables have been updated with
the latest available information, and some have been replaced with new ones
that more effectively communicate the points we are making.
COMPANION SITE
ISBN-10: 1111940975 | ISBN-13: 9781111940973
Students will find open access to learning objectives, tutorial quizzes, chapter
glossaries, flashcards, and crossword puzzles, all correlated by chapter. Access at
www.cengage.com/politicalscience/kinsella/worldpolitics/10e.
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
XVI PREFACE
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We owe thanks to innumerable colleagues and students who have assisted us over the
years as we have worked toward producing and improving this book. Rather than
single out some for expressions of gratitude here, we will pass over those who in the
past contributed to the formation of our thinking. Many of them, though not all, will
find themselves footnoted in the text. We do want to thank explicitly those whose
comments on the ninth edition assisted us as we prepared the current edition—Giulio
Galarotti, Sean Golforth, and Robert Packer—as well as those who have read and
commented on parts or all of this book in its previous editions: Francis Adams,
William Avery, Andrew Bennett, Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, Nicole Burtchett, Steve
Chan, Claudio Cioffi-Revilla, Delane Clark, David Clinton, Jonathan Crystal, Vesna
Danilovic, Robert Dorf, Raymond Duvall, Nader Entesser, Michael Francis, John
Freeman, Scott Sigmund Gartner, F. Gregory Gause, Guy Gosselin, Isebill Gruhn,
Donald Hafner, Roger Hamburg, Robert Harkavy, Jeffrey Hart, Terrance Hopmann,
Darril Hudson, Patrick James, Robert Jervis, Brian Job, Kelly Kadera, Robert
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
PREFACE XVII
Keohane, Joseph Lepgold, Andrew Long, Robert Mandel, Zeev Maoz, Sean Mathe-
son, Will Moore, Douglas Nelson, Rene Peritz, James Ray, J. Rogers, J. David Singer,
Randolph Siverson, Christopher Sprecher, Stuart Thorson, Patricia Stein Wrightson,
Michael Stohl, Richard Stoll, William Thompson, Herbert Tillema, Ming Wan,
Michael Ward, and Dina Zinnes.
Heidi Busche and Eveline Fontenelle provided valuable research and other
assistance in the preparation of the tenth edition—thank you. Thanks also to
Susan Finnemore Brennan, senior editor at W.H. Freeman and Company, publisher
of the first five editions of World Politics, to Marilea Polk Fried at Bedford/St. Mar-
tin’s, publisher of the sixth edition, and to David Tatom and Carolyn Merrill at
Wadsworth, the book’s home as of the seventh edition. Parts of the book represent
research done with the aid of grants from the Carnegie Corporation, the Ford
Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the National
Science Foundation, the United States Institute of Peace, and the World Society
Foundation (Switzerland). Over the course of nine editions, our home universities—
Yale, Indiana, South Carolina, American, and Portland State—have provided truly
fine environments for research and reflection. We hope that all of these people and
institutions will to some degree be pleased with the outcome; any embarrassment
with it must be ours alone.
David Kinsella
Bruce Russett
Harvey Starr
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
David Kinsella (Ph.D., Yale University, 1993) is Professor and Chair of Political
Science and Director of the Public Affairs and Policy Ph.D. Program in the Mark
O. Hatfield School of Government at Portland State University. He has served as
editor of International Studies Perspectives (2005–2009) and president of the
International Studies Association’s Midwest Region. He has also taught at Amer-
ican University, the University of Missouri, and Yale, and was a Ralph D. Mer-
shon postdoctoral fellow at Ohio State University. His areas of research include
the global arms trade, international conflict processes, and international law and
ethics. He is co-editor of The Morality of War: A Reader (2007) and author of
several journal articles and book chapters.
Bruce Russett (Ph.D., Yale University, 1961) is Dean Acheson Research Professor
of International Relations and Political Science at Yale. He was editor of the
Journal of Conflict Resolution from 1972 to 2009. He has been president of the
International Studies Association and the Peace Science Society (International),
and holds honorary doctorates from Uppsala University and Williams College.
He has also taught at Harvard, Columbia, MIT, and the Free University of Brus-
sels, and was Visiting Professor of International Capital Markets Law at the Uni-
versity of Tokyo, and has held research appointments at the University of
Michigan, University of North Carolina, the Richardson Institute in London, the
Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study, and the University of Tel Aviv. He has
had numerous research grants from the National Science Foundation, and from
the Carnegie Corporation, the Japan Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Gug-
genheim Foundation, the Naval War College, the U.S. Institute of Peace, and the
World Society Foundation of Switzerland. His publications include twenty-seven
books and over 230 articles.
xix
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
XX ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Harvey Starr (Ph.D., Yale University, 1971) is the Dag Hammarskjöld Professor
in International Affairs in the Department of Political Science at the University of
South Carolina. He has been president of the Peace Science Society (Interna-
tional), Vice President of the American Political Science Association, vice presi-
dent of the International Studies Association, and president of the Conflict
Processes Section of the APSA. He has served as editor of International Interac-
tions (1991–2000) and associate editor of the Journal of Politics (2001–2003).
He specializes in international relations theory and method, international conflict,
geopolitics, and foreign policy analysis. He has also taught at the University of
Aberdeen, Scotland, and the Australian National University. He is the author or
co-author of fourteen books and monographs, and over ninety journal articles or
book chapters; recent books are the edited volumes, Approaches, Levels and
Methods of Analysis in International Relations: Crossing Boundaries (2006), and
Dealing with Failed States (2009).
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
I would rather understand a single cause than be king of Persia.
—Democritus of Abder
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
WORLD POLITICS: ANALYSIS,
CHOICE, AND CONSTRAINT
CHAPTER
1
THREE MOMENTOUS EVENTS
DROPPING THE ATOMIC BOMB
On August 6, 1945, the U.S. bomber Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb on the
Japanese city of Hiroshima. Coupled with the explosion of another bomb over
Nagasaki three days later, this act precipitated the Japanese surrender and the
end of World War II. Nearly 200,000 people, most of them noncombatant civi-
lians, ultimately died from the explosions. These two bombings represented the
first, and so far the only, times nuclear weapons were used against enemy targets.
Exploding a bomb of this magnitude (about 4,000 times more powerful than the
biggest conventional World War II explosive) marked an enormous leap in the
ability to kill on a massive scale. At the same time, it brought forth the age of
nuclear deterrence, when peace among the great powers was kept, at least in
part, by the awesome threat of mutual annihilation. At the time of these bomb-
ings, both scientists and statesmen realized that they were engaged in an act that
would fundamentally change the future; the nuclear physicist J. Robert Oppenhei-
mer, on watching the first test explosion a month before Hiroshima, quoted to
himself the phrase from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad Gita, “Now, I am
become death, destroyer of worlds.”
Despite the magnitude of this act and the precedent it set, there was remark-
ably little discussion within the American government as to whether the bomb
should be used in war. Questions of morality were either ignored or quickly
stilled with the argument that, overall, using the bomb would save lives. The
only alternative to the use of the bomb to force Japan’s surrender seemed to be
an American invasion of the Japanese home islands, in which tens of thousands
of Americans and hundreds of thousands of Japanese casualties could be
expected. U.S. Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson later wrote that the reasons
for dropping the atomic bomb “have always seemed compelling and clear, and I
cannot see how any person vested with such responsibilities as mine could have
taken any other course or given any other advice to his chiefs.” British Prime
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
4 CHAPTER 1
Minister Winston Churchill reported that “the decision whether or not to use the
atomic bomb to compel the surrender of Japan was never even an issue. There
was unanimous, automatic, unquestioned agreement.”1 How can we explain
this?
Particular characteristics of President Harry Truman may have made some
difference. Before President Franklin Roosevelt’s death in April 1945, it was
assumed that the atomic bomb would be used in combat, although Roosevelt
had not entirely ruled out the possibility of first warning the enemy and demon-
strating the power of the bomb in a test. However, Truman was inexperienced
and uninformed about foreign affairs; when he became president, he was not
even aware of the atomic bomb project. He was therefore in no position to chal-
lenge the existing basic assumption about the bomb’s intended use or to dissent
sharply from the military and foreign policy plans that had been put into effect
by the advisers he had inherited from Roosevelt. Only one adviser—Admiral Wil-
liam Leahy, whose opinion had already been devalued due to his prediction that
the bomb would not work at all—did not accept the consensus. There was some
disagreement among the nuclear scientists who had produced the bomb, but in
the end the prevailing scientific opinion was that they could “propose no technical
demonstration likely to bring an end to the war; we can see no acceptable alterna-
tive to direct military use.”2
Truman was caught up in the near unanimity around him. Roosevelt,
although more experienced and politically stronger, probably would not have
behaved much differently. Bureaucratic momentum carried matters along, and it
would have required either a very unusual president or an exceptionally open
structure of decision-making to slow it. Furthermore, the alternative seemed tech-
nically and politically dangerous. The Japanese could be warned, and the bomb
tested publicly in some deserted spot, but there was a risk that the bomb would
not go off or not look very impressive. The enemy would be uncowed, and,
some advisers feared, Congress would be in a political uproar over the fizzled
demonstration and consequent American casualties suffered in an invasion.
Nowhere—in the executive branch, in Congress, or in the public at large—was
there much disagreement over the need to end the war as soon as possible, princi-
pally to spare American lives. Consequently, there were few moral restraints on
the use of atomic weapons in that war. Certainly, there had been little objection
earlier to the massive conventional bombing of civilian targets in Germany and
Japan.
The basic constraints, therefore, stemmed from the international situation: a
war waged against a determined opponent at a time when the moral and legal
restrictions on warfare were few. Moreover, the international balance of forces
likely to emerge after the war reinforced this perspective. The wartime Soviet–
American alliance was deteriorating rapidly, especially in the face of severe
1
Henry L. Stimson, “The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb,” Harper’s 194 (February 1947), p. 106;
Winston S. Churchill, Triumph and Tragedy (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1953), p. 639.
2
Scientific report quoted in Stimson, “The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb,” p. 101.
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
WORLD POLITICS: ANALYSIS, CHOICE, AND CONSTRAINT 5
disagreements about who should control Eastern Europe. Most American deci-
sionmakers welcomed the atomic bomb as a trump card of “atomic diplomacy,”
which would impress the Russians with American power and encourage them to
make concessions to the American view about how the postwar world should be
organized. Additionally, the Soviet Union had not yet entered the war with Japan.
If the atomic bomb could force a Japanese surrender before the Russians were to
attack Japan (in fact, the surrender came after that attack), it would help to limit
Russian intrusion into Japanese-controlled portions of the Far East. American for-
eign policy decisionmakers largely agreed on these perceptions, as did most mem-
bers of Congress and most opinion leaders in the American public.3
3
One valuable study is Barton J. Bernstein, “The Atomic Bombings Reconsidered,” Foreign Affairs
41 (January/February 1995), pp. 135–152; for the relevance of diplomacy toward the Soviet Union,
see, contrastingly, Gar Alperovitz, Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam, 2nd ed. (London:
Penguin, 1985), especially the new introduction; and McGeorge Bundy, Danger and Survival (New
York: Vintage, 1988), chap. 2.
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
6 CHAPTER 1
The scenario was repeated in Indonesia in August 1997, and similar events
unfolded in Malaysia and the Philippines. The financial crisis then spread to East
Asia. In October, the South Korean won plunged in value, sending the world’s
eleventh-largest economy reeling. Despite heroic efforts by the Korean central
bank to prevent its currency from breaching the psychologically important barrier
of 1,000 won to the dollar, what one Korean official said would “never, never,
never” happen did happen in November, when the won was allowed to close at
1,009. The pressure on the won reverberated. The Singapore and Taiwanese dol-
lars also sank to new lows, while the value of the Hong Kong dollar remained
steady only as a result of intensive intervention by Hong Kong central bankers in
the currency market.
The currency crisis threatened severe economic dislocation in each of the
affected countries and, in some cases, forecast economic collapse as it became
clear that some major corporate institutions would not be able to meet financial
obligations to their creditors, their customers, or their workers. Thailand, Indone-
sia, the Philippines, and even South Korea turned to the international community
for help. Before long, more than $110 billion had been pledged to these countries
on behalf of the IMF, the World Bank, and other sources (primarily the U.S. and
Japanese governments). In return, the recipients promised to undertake various
economic and financial reforms.
Within twelve months of the collapse of the baht, most Asian currencies had
recovered, but the economic damage brought on by the financial crisis was stun-
ning. During 1998, the Thai economy contracted by 10 percent, while Indonesia’s
shrank by 13 percent. Millions of people watched their incomes and savings dry
up as assets were devalued, wages were cut, and unemployment soared. The eco-
nomic crisis had a profound impact on domestic politics in Asia as well. Japan
was criticized for not doing more to prevent the meltdown in Southeast Asia,
and international pressure mounted for the Japanese government to stimulate its
own economy and open its markets in order to assist the region’s economic and
financial recovery. In April 1998, Prime Minister Ryutaro Hashimoto announced
an unprecedented $128 billion domestic program consisting of major government
spending and substantial tax cuts. In Korea, the financial crisis helped clinch elec-
toral victory for longtime political outsider Kim Dae Jung. And in Indonesia, eco-
nomic hardships triggered a series of violent riots that ultimately toppled
President Suharto after more than three decades in office—a departure which,
among other things, helped pave the way for negotiations on East Timorese
independence.
There were two main explanations for the Asian financial crisis. One placed
the blame on factors internal to Asian societies. Long before the crisis, many
Asian governments were criticized in the West for their authoritarian political
practices. Dismissing these criticisms as the West’s failure to appreciate “Asian
values” was relatively easy when the Asian governments had an enviable record
of delivering economic prosperity to their citizens. But now the tables were turned
as critics pointed to the economic downside of Asian values: poor regulation, high
corporate debt, favoritism, even corruption. The multibillion-dollar financial
empire controlled by the Suharto family in Indonesia stood as a potent symbol of
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
WORLD POLITICS: ANALYSIS, CHOICE, AND CONSTRAINT 7
the excesses of “crony capitalism.” This was essentially the IMF’s perspective on
the crisis, which is why the Fund insisted on economic and financial reform as a
condition for its bailout. It was also the prevalent view within the U.S. govern-
ment and on Wall Street.4
The other perspective looked instead to external factors, seeing in the crisis
the classic characteristics of a financial panic. According to this explanation,
although there may have been elements of cronyism and other weaknesses in the
Asian economies, their macroeconomic fundamentals were basically sound. It
was just that the enthusiasm with which international investors sought to profit
from the so-called Asian miracle was a bit excessive, and it created a bubble of
confidence. The bubble burst in the summer of 1997, investors panicked, and the
exodus of capital from the region left currency values in the gutter. International
investors participated in a self-fulfilling prophecy. It was their own actions, more
than internal economic weaknesses and poor management, that undermined the
economic and financial stability of the region. What made Asian economies vul-
nerable to investor pullout was the very openness and financial deregulation that
attracted the huge influx of foreign capital in the first place. Easy come, easy go.
For those who found more merit in this second explanation, including many
policymakers in Asia and other emerging economies, one key lesson of the financial
crisis was the ineffectiveness of government intervention in capital markets. With the
exception of Hong Kong, none of the Asian central banks succeeded in preventing
huge devaluations of their national currencies. Thus, in the aftermath, there were
calls for the re-regulation of capital flows in hopes that this would enhance the lim-
ited leverage exercised by governments when the next currency crisis came along.
At the same time, the meltdown in Asia provided an opportunity for the IMF
to expand its own role in world affairs, as it had during the Latin American debt
crisis of the 1980s and the East European transition to market capitalism in the
early 1990s. This has generally pleased those who emphasized the homegrown
causes of the crisis, since the IMF has spearheaded internal economic and finan-
cial reforms consistent with the Western model of free-market capitalism. The
policies of the IMF during the Asian crisis were criticized by many, but efforts to
reform the “international financial architecture” in order to incorporate lessons
learned from the Asian crisis has done nothing to diminish the IMF as an integral
component.5
The events of 1997 and 1998 highlight some important features of contempo-
rary international relations. The connection between domestic affairs and foreign
affairs was, in this case, painfully apparent. Although the free flow of capital
4
For the U.S. government and Wall Street view of the crisis, see Robert E. Rubin and
Jacob Weisberg, In an Uncertain World: Tough Choices from Wall Street to Washington (New York:
Random House, 2003), chaps. 8–9. For a critique, see Robert Wade and Frank Veneroso, “The
Asian Crisis: The High Debt Model vs. the Wall Street–Treasury–IMF Complex,” New Left Review
228 (March/ April 1998), pp. 3–23.
5
Jeffrey E. Garten, “Lessons for the Next Financial Crisis,” Foreign Affairs 78 (March/April 1999),
pp. 76–92; Barry Eichengreen, Toward a New International Financial Architecture: A Practical Post–
Asia Agenda (Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 1999).
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
8 CHAPTER 1
9/11
On the morning of September 11, 2001, two passenger jets crashed into the north
and south towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, and a third into
the Pentagon on the outskirts of Washington, D.C. A fourth jet, also headed for
Washington, D.C. (the White House or the U.S. Capitol), plunged into the ground
in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, after a struggle between the plane’s hijackers and
passengers. Almost 3,000 people were killed in the terrorist attacks, including
approximately 400 emergency personnel who perished along with others when
the two World Trade Center towers collapsed within forty minutes of each other;
over 2,000 were injured. An estimated $16 billion in physical assets were
destroyed, and rescue and cleanup cost more than $11 billion.6 It was the most
destructive attack in the history of modern terrorism. For the American people,
who have enjoyed a history of insulation from foreign attack, the psychological
impact of 9/11 was profound.
The hijackers were operatives of al Qaeda, a global terrorist network led by
Osama bin Laden and dedicated to resurrecting the caliphate that once united all
Muslims under Islamic law. Although bin Laden, a Saudi exile, and his associates
had once received support from the United States in their resistance to Soviet
forces occupying Afghanistan in the 1980s, the U.S. became enemy number one
after it established a military presence in Saudi Arabia—home to Mecca and
Medina, Islam’s most sacred sites—as a result of the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait
and the subsequent Gulf War. More generally, bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman
al Zawahiri, inveighed against the U.S. for supporting Israel’s occupation of Pales-
tinian land and for helping to prop up corrupt and repressive regimes in the Arab
world. Although many, including the administration of George W. Bush, hastened
to add that the U.S. was targeted due to hatred of American freedoms and the
American way of life, it is unlikely that those grounds alone provided sufficient
animus for al Qaeda’s jihad against the United States.
Under the guidance of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Mohammed Atef, and bin
Laden himself, planning for the “planes operation,” as it was known to those
6
The cumulative loss in national income through the end of 2003 was forecast to be 5 percent of
the gross domestic product (GDP), or about $500 billion; see Patrick Lenain, Marcos Bonturi, and
Vincent Koen, “The Economic Consequences of Terrorism,” OECD Working Paper No. 334
(July 2002), pp. 6–8.
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
WORLD POLITICS: ANALYSIS, CHOICE, AND CONSTRAINT 9
involved, began to gel nearly three years before the 9/11 attack. (Ten strikes
against targets on both coasts were originally envisioned.)7 Ironically, although
their grievance was at least partly a reaction to the openness of American society
and global reach of Western culture, these became essential tools of the 9/11
hijackers. After training in al Qaeda camps in Afghanistan, two of what would
eventually become a group of nineteen hijackers—fifteen Saudi nationals, one
Egyptian, one Lebanese, and two Emiris—arrived in Los Angeles in January
2000, soon establishing residences in San Diego. In May and June, three more
operatives arrived in Newark, New Jersey, from Hamburg, Germany, where they
had been students for a number of years (a fourth was denied a travel visa), after
which they moved to Florida to attend flight school. This Hamburg contingent
would subsequently pilot three of the four planes. The fourth pilot had received
flight training in Arizona as early as 1997, before returning to Saudi Arabia, and
more training again in 2001. Although some of their travels and activities raised
eyebrows with law enforcement officials in both the United States and Germany,
and should have raised many more, these Arab nationals were able to maintain
low profiles in open and multicultural Western societies.
With the arrival of the remaining “muscle” hijackers, those whose job it was
to storm the flight deck and keep the flight crew and passengers at bay, all that
was required to carry out the planned attacks was coordination and some luck.
The passenger screening procedures in place at the Boston, Newark, and
Washington, D.C. airports did not prevent the hijackers from boarding the
planes, nor did they prevent them from carrying aboard the box cutters and
mace they would need to incapacitate the pilots and any interfering flight atten-
dants or air marshals. Having undertaken a suicide mission, the hijackers’ success
depended, in the end, on intimidating the passengers, including by threatening to
detonate explosives (which they did not in fact have aboard), long enough to
guide their fuel-laden missiles to their targets.
The coordination of simultaneous attacks was key, a capacity that al Qaeda
had demonstrated in the twin bombings of the American embassies in Kenya and
Tanzania in 1998. Three of the planes were seized within forty minutes of each
other. Airline officials concluded that a simultaneous hijacking was in progress
and had barely broadcast their warnings to other aircraft when the fourth plane,
which had taken off late, was seized. By then, both towers of the World Trade
Center had been hit, and the crash into the Pentagon was only minutes away.
The delay and the passengers’ realization that the hijackers were planning a simi-
lar suicide attack prompted a heroic counter-mutiny resulting in the failure of this
plane to reach its target. Had the passengers not acted, it is likely that the plane
would have been intercepted by one of two pairs of fighter jets scrambled in
7
The definitive account of the planning, execution, and reaction to the attacks is The 9/11 Commis-
sion Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
(New York: Norton, 2004). For a review of post–9/11 academic and policy literature, see Lisa
Anderson, “Shock and Awe: Interpretations of the Events of September 11,” World Politics 56
(January 2004), pp. 303–325.
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
10 CHAPTER 1
LEVELS OF ANALYSIS
The preceding three events are taken from different times; involve both developed
and developing countries and state and nonstate actors; and deal with military,
political, and economic matters. The quality of evidence necessary for
8
The 9/11 Commission Report, chap. 4; see also Richard A. Clarke, Against All Enemies: Inside
America’s War on Terror (New York: Free Press, 2004).
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
WORLD POLITICS: ANALYSIS, CHOICE, AND CONSTRAINT 11
understanding the decisions that were made varies from one case to another, as
does the plausibility of our speculations. Political scientists usually find it difficult
to predict a single event, such as the American decision to drop the atomic bomb
on Japan or the 9/11 attacks, and economists cannot predict financial meltdowns,
as occurred in Asia in 1997. More often, we try to understand what factors con-
tribute to the occurrence of certain classes of events—for example, warfare, ter-
rorism, or currency fluctuation. Thus, most analysts see their job as trying to
detect comparable, preceding events that seem to produce similar types of
behavior.
How can states and other actors existing within similar environments behave
so differently? Why do actors in different environments sometimes behave simi-
larly? To address such puzzles, we need to describe what international systems
look like, how they change over time, and how they affect the behavior of the
entities within them. We also need to look at the internal, or domestic, makeup
of states. Doing so helps us understand the conditions under which states will
cooperate or coordinate their actions with other international actors, and those
under which conflicts will develop, escalate, and even lead to violence. We wish
to understand what processes—cooperative or conflictual; economic, diplomatic,
or military—result in what patterns of outcomes. We wish to understand the
causes of the patterns we find.
In our attempts to uncover causes, or significant preceding events, we have
found it useful to distinguish between levels of analysis—points
analysis on an ordered
scale of size and complexity. These levels include units whose behavior we
attempt to describe, predict, or explain, as well as units whose impact on individ-
ual decisionmakers we examine. That is, a level may refer to the actors them-
selves, to the states or individuals whose actions we are trying to explain, or (as
in our discussions so far) to different kinds of influences on those actors. In our
earlier examples, we used influences from various levels of analysis to explain
decisions made by national political leaders and economic officials.
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
12 CHAPTER 1
nation-state level provides a picture of greater depth, detail, and intensity. Singer
summarized the level-of-analysis problem with this set of analogies:
In any area of scholarly inquiry, there are always several ways in which the phenomena
under study may be sorted and arranged for purposes of systematic analysis. Whether
in the physical or social sciences, the observer may choose to focus upon the parts or
upon the whole, upon the components or upon the system. He may, for example,
choose between the flowers or the garden, the rocks or the quarry, the trees or the
forest, the houses or the neighborhood, the cars or the traffic jam, the delinquents or
the gang, the legislators or the legislature, and so on.9
9
J. David Singer, “The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations,” in Klaus Knorr and
Sidney Verba, eds., The International System: Theoretical Essays (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univer-
sity Press, 1961), p. 77.
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
WORLD POLITICS: ANALYSIS, CHOICE, AND CONSTRAINT 13
ask and what kinds of questions might be answered most profitably from which
perspective.10
10
Martin Hollis and Steve Smith, Explaining and Understanding International Relations (Oxford:
Clarendon, 1990). They note, “At each stage the ‘unit’ of the higher level becomes the ‘system’ of the
lower layer” (p. 8). See also Barry Buzan, “The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations
Reconsidered,” in Ken Booth and Steve Smith, eds., International Relations Theory Today (University
Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995), pp. 198–216.
11
Kenneth N. Waltz, Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis (New York: Columbia
University Press, 1954).
Copyright 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.