Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Data Analysis 4 ANOVA
Data Analysis 4 ANOVA
MAED 1 – ENGLISH
A. Research Question
40 40 40
40 45 40
40 45 45
40 40 40
40 45 40
40 45 40
40 45 40
45 40 40
45 45 40
C. JAMOVI Results
ANOVA
One-Way ANOVA
One-Way ANOVA
F df1 df2 p
Group Descriptives
Strand N Mean SD SE
Table 7
Test of Significant Difference in the Oral Communication scores of ABM, HUMMS, and TVL
2 . 034
D. Interpretation
Descriptives (means and standard deviations ) – There are 30 respondent who are
Grade 11 students. The average score of ABM students in Understanding the
Self is 41.00, 41. 00 for HUMSS, and TVL average score is 40.50 with a
standar deviation of 2.108, 2.582 and 1.58. They have closed SD especially
the ABM with 2.108 and HUMSS with sd of 2.582. A similar homogeniety in
terms of standard deviation.
Inferential results (p-value , if significant or not) – As reflected, .034 is less than the
alpha value .05, results conlude that there is significant difference on the
scores of ABM, HUMSS and TVL in Understanding the Self subject.
First, there is no significant difference on the scores of ABM and HUMSS also ABM
to TVL.
Second, theres no significant difference between HUMSS and ABM, but there is
significant difference between HUMMS and TVL because of significant level .036
which is lesser than the alpha value 0.05.
Third, theres no significant difference on the scores of TVL and ABM but there is
significant difference between TVL and HUMMS because of .036 significance.