GROUP DISCUSSION SHEET

Course/Subject (e.g. VPHY 50, VPHY 60, ZOTC 85, etc.)

Section
Group No
Date Submitted (mm/dd/year)
Group Members
(List Alphabetically in the following format: Surname, First Name / Signature; Don’t include absent groupmate)
1. 6.
2. 7.
3. 8.
4. 9.
5. 10.
Group Discussion No (Encircle) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Question(s)
Give this illustration a Title and a Caption or Description

Enumerate and briefly discuss the possible clinical signs of thoracolumbar intervertebral disc disease (IVDD)
in dogs. Mention the CNS pathways possible affected by the condition.
Answer/Discussion Output
(Continue at the back if necessary; Attach additional sheet if necessary)
 Answer/Discussion Output

References (Follow APA 7th Format)

Rubrics for Group Discussion Output

Understanding of Key Concepts (0-5 points):

o 0 points: The response indicates a lack of understanding of essential physiology concepts.
o 1 point: The response demonstrates minimal understanding but contains major misconceptions.
o 2 points: The response shows basic comprehension but lacks depth.
o 3 points: The response displays a good understanding of core concepts.
o 4 points: The response exhibits a strong grasp of key physiological principles.
o 5 points: The response demonstrates an exceptional understanding of complex concepts.
Integration of Course Material (0-5 points):
o 0 points: The response does not incorporate any course material or references.
o 1 point: The response briefly mentions course material but lacks meaningful integration.
o 2 points: The response includes some relevant course material but could provide more context.
o 3 points: The response effectively integrates course material to support key points.
o 4 points: The response skillfully incorporates course content, enhancing the answer's depth.
o 5 points: The response seamlessly integrates course material to create a comprehensive and insightful answer.
Clarity and Conciseness (0-5 points):
o 0 points: The response is unclear and overly verbose, making it difficult to understand.
o 1 point: The response is somewhat clear but contains unnecessary details or wordiness.
o 2 points: The response is clear and concise, with minor room for improvement.
o 3 points: The response is very clear and concise, effectively conveying ideas in a brief format.
o 4 points: The response is exceptionally clear and concise, with no room for improvement.
Critical Thinking and Synthesis (0-5 points):
o 0 points: The response lacks critical thinking and fails to synthesize ideas.
o 1 point: The response shows limited critical thinking and minimal synthesis of information.
o 2 points: The response demonstrates some critical thinking but lacks in-depth synthesis.
o 3 points: The response displays good critical thinking and synthesizes ideas effectively.
o 4 points: The response exhibits strong critical thinking and skillful synthesis of complex information.
o 5 points: The response showcases exceptional critical thinking and masterful synthesis of concepts.