RektProof Setups / Notes

- Table of Contents
- RP Breaker Setup
- Range strategy 區間策略
- Power of Three (PO3)
- Broken Swing Points
- Reversal Pattern 反轉形態
- Three Tap Setup (TTS)
- PriceAction - Market Structure Breaks 市場結構突破
- PriceAction - Supply/Demand vs Liquidity 供應/需求與流動性
- Price Action - Alts 價格⾏動 - 備選⽅案
- The power of consistency and patience 堅持和耐⼼的⼒量

(Translate by: SEN, Tols)

1
RP Breaker Setup
Here is a review of some current price action on a short setup using the breaker setup.
High forms, Price breaks the high/deviates above and prints a market structure break,
Formed Demand in grey.

• 這是對使⽤突破空頭訂單設計的⼀些價格⾏為回顧。
• ⾼位形態，價格突破⾼位/偏離上⽅並展現市場結構突破，形成灰⾊需求。
- breaker定義：當⼀個OB (Order block，訂單塊)被⼀段趨勢⾏情突破後，這塊OB就可以視為
breaker。 (By Tols)
- Tols 的理解：有⼀些說法會把OB視作廣義的供給/需求區間，⽽當供給/需求區間被突破後，可能產
⽣⽀撐阻⼒互換 (S/R flip, Support/Resistance flip) 。OB跟breaker的⾓⾊互換我想可能也是差不多
的概念。
- 下圖，價格在(1.形成低位)後，(2.掃蕩至低點下⽅獵取流動性-突破交易者建⽴空單和擺盪低點多單
⽌損)，接著突破灰⾊那塊供給OB之後，(3.破前⽅擺盪⾼點，形成MSB(Market Structure Break)，
然後(4.測試灰⾊那塊breaker)，此時原本做為供給區的OB被突破後角⾊互換，成為有效⼒的
Demand(breaker)。

• Ideally you want this demand to hold to confirm a valid shift.

• 理想情況下，您希望保持此需求以確認有效。
• 可以看到有個突破前⽅⼩⾼點的⾏情，構成MSB，下⽅灰⾊區間可以先看成⼀個需求區Demand.

2
- Demand fails to hold and you have a MSB to the downside. Price retests the newly formed breaker.
- 需求未能保持，你有⼀個 MSB 向下。 價格重新測試新形成的breaker。
- 接著這個需求區被破壞，實體跌破形成MSB。且插針回測此由需求轉成的供給的breaker，

- Price proceeds to the next area of liquidity (Equal Lows) before reversing.
- 價格在反轉前進入下⼀個流動性區域（等低點）

3
Range strategy
Quick write up on a commonly used setup I tend to look for when price ranges.
快速寫下我傾向於在價格範圍內尋找的常⽤設置。
Criteria are as follows (標準如下)：

1. Range Forms 區間範圍

2. Price sweep/deviation of range point 價格去SH/偏離的範圍點
3. MSB (Market structure break) MSB（市場結構中斷）
4. Test of formed SD 形成的SD測試 (SD: Sweep/Deviation)
5. TP

4
Range forms
-Price outlines two swing points in the market.
-Price sweep/deviation
-Following the identified swing points- price proceeds to sweep/deviate before closing back inside
range
-價格勾勒出市場的兩個擺動點。
-價格獵取⽌損/偏離
- 跟隨確定的擺動點 - 價格在收盤回到區間內之前繼續掃蕩/套牢

5
MSB (Market Structure Break)
-Following the price sweep/deviation; price breaks structure and shifts to a new low.
• Test of formed SD
• Formed supply following sweep + MSB
• 跟隨價格獵取⽌損/套牢； 價格打破結構並轉向新低。
• 形成的SD(SD: Sweep/Deviation)測試
• 獵取⽌損後形成供應+ MSB

6
TP
- Following the test of the formed SD, price proceeds to the untapped low.
- 在測試形成的 SD(SD: Sweep/Deviation) 之後，價格進入未測試的低點。

7
Power of Three
1. Accumulation : Positions Build Up 積累（吸籌）：倉位積累
2. Manipulation: Engineer Liquidity 操縱：獵取流動性
3. Distribution(Expansion ): Positions Exit 延伸：持倉退出

Notes on the chart:

BTC Had a pretty good example on the power of 3 (BTC 有⼀個關於 PO3的很好的例⼦。)

Accumulate at day open, manipulate price down shortly after to engineer liquidity then push price up
and look to distribute.
在開盤時積累，在不久之後操縱價格下跌以涉取流動性，然後推⾼價格並尋求投遞。

8
9
10
Broken Swing Points 破碎的擺動點

• I want to briefly cover instances when I see traders get trapped within different variations as price
consolidates and breaks down and how to potentially avoid.
• 我想簡要介紹當我看到交易者因價格盤整和下跌⽽陷入不同變化的情況，以及如何避免

• Small write up to cover:

- Broken Swing Points 破碎的擺動點
- Potential Entries 潛在進場入⼝
- Conclusion 結論

11
Broken swing points vs Swing failure pattern
突破的擺動點與擺動失敗模式
We know the standard swing failure pattern; price sweeps a level and reverts to the opposing side.
我們知道標準的擺動點失敗模式； 價格掃過⼀個⽔平並回到相反的⼀側。

What If we fail to sweep but close below a swing failure pattern?

如果我們未能獵取⽌損但收於擺動失敗模式下⽅怎麼辦？

This is when breakout traders come in and are trapped hence the manipulation cycle.
這是突破交易者進入並被困的時候，因此進入了操縱週期。

Broken Swing Point / 破碎的擺動點

- Price closes below a swing low as those anticipating lower prices short the breakdown
- Not only were stops engineered as that of a SFP but you bring more liquidity for iceberg longs to fill
using breakout shorts as their fuel
- 價格收於擺動低點下⽅，因為那些跌破預期價格的⼈做空了
- ⽌損不僅被設計為 SFP 的⽌損，⽽且您還為⼤量多頭帶來更多流動性，以使⽤突破空頭作為燃料來
填補

SFP (Swing Failure pattern)

- Price sweeps the low: Stops are swept / 價格掃低：⽌損掃過
- (Trader tend to put their stops below swing points) / （交易者傾向於將⽌損設在擺動點以下）
- No closes below and price gives a Three Tap before going higher 沒有收盤價，價格在走⾼之前給出
了三次觸碰

12
Potential Entries 潛在進入點
PO3's play a vital role when price breaks a key swing point. As long as we leave an opposing high
any close below is a high probability we trap first and then go for the high second
當價格突破關鍵擺動點時，PO3 發揮著⾄關重要的作⽤。 只要我們離開相反的⾼點，任何低於收盤價
的可能性都很⼤，我們⾸先陷入困境，然後再去尋找⾼點

Breakers offer good entry points for a broken low once we shift above
⼀旦我們向上移動，突破者為跌破低點提供了良好的切入點

Conclusion
Acting out of impulse anticipating certain movements will only leave you tied into a position that you
didn't have a game plan for. Ask yourself why we are breaking down, if we left any opposing ends that
might potentially trap retail traders.

結論
出於預期某些動作⽽衝動⾏事只會讓你陷入⼀個你沒有遊戲計劃的位置。 問問⾃⼰為什麼我們會失
敗，可能我們踏入了可能困住散⼾的陷阱。

13
Reversal Pattern / 反轉形態
Quick write up/examples on a commonly used reversal setup that I tend to look for.
關於我傾向於尋找的常⽤反轉型態的快速記錄/⽰例。

Criteria are as follows / 標準如下

1. Low forms 低點
2. Price Deviates/Sweep below the low / 價格偏離/掃過低點
3. MS Shift (market structure shift / 市場結構轉換)
4. Test of formed Breaker/Demand / 形成Breaker,需求區的測試

14
15
16
Three Tap Setup (TTS)

One of the easier setups to spot and play after identifying your range. This setup is tailored
around trapping breakout traders and forming a base to retest at a later date
確定你的區間，圍繞誘捕突破交易者形成的交易模式，根據重新測試為基礎。
1. Swing Point forms / 擺動點形式
2. Swing Point Swept/Deviate / 擺動點掃盪/偏離
3. Retest / ⼆次測試

• When price reaches a formed swing point in a range it is common to get "bearish at
demand" and "bullish at supply".
• 當價格達到⼀個範圍內的形成的擺動點時，通常會出現“需求看跌”和“供應看漲”。

• Those expecting a break will enter a breakout trade, ultimately getting trapped as we
return to the level the trap started at a later date.
• 那些期待突破的⼈將進入突破交易，最終在我們回到陷阱開始的⽔平時陷入困境。

17
18
19
20
Conclusion / 結論

The market revolves around liquidity moving from low to high and vice versa, running stops
on both ends.
市場圍繞著流動性從低位到⾼位，反之亦然，在區間兩端停⽌。

It's good to enter the market at the extremes / 在極端情況下進入市場是件好事：

The area buyers stepped in and the area sellers stepped in. / 區域買家介入，區域賣家介入。

21
PriceAction - Market Structure Breaks / 市場結構打破

Market structure vs Market structure breaks - a write up on what I consider to be a valid

market structure shift.
市場結構與市場結構斷裂 - 寫⼀篇關於我認為有效的市場結構轉變的⽂章。

The views are subjective to my own trading knowledge as it’s different for everyone.
PriceAction -
這些觀點對我⾃⼰的交易知識來說是主觀的，因為每個⼈都不⼀樣。

22
Orderflow (訂單流)

Trend-Range (accumulate-Distribute) / 趨勢範圍（累積-分佈）

23
Key Notes:
• Traders will often confuse the order flow in which price moves.
• As price trends certain key lows will form which should hold if structure is valid.
• As price exhausts it will range.
• In a uptrend this can be viewed as re-accumulation .
• In a downtrend this can be viewed as re-distribution .
• 交易者通常會混淆價格變動的訂單流。
• 隨著價格趨勢，某些關鍵低點形成，如果結構有效，該低點應該持有。
• 隨著價格耗盡，它將會變化。
• 在上升趨勢中，這可以被視為重新積累。
• 在下降趨勢中，這可以被視為重新分佈。

Common Mistakes:
• its common for price to shift new lows and lower highs in side are accumulation cycle.
• as long as price keeps intact the lows leading into the trend, the market structure remains
valid.
• 價格移動新低和較低⾼點的共同點是積累週期。
• 只要價格保持引領趨勢的低點不變，市場結構就仍然有效。

Order Flow:
1. Trend
2. Re-Accumulation (Range)
3. Trend
4. Re-Accumulation (Range)

24
Valid Market Structure / 有效的市場結構

Valid market structure is market structure that follows order flow with unbroken lows as price
exhausts and enters re accumulation.
有效的市場結構是隨著價格耗盡並進入重新積累⽽跟隨訂單流的市場結構。

Range following a trend

Re-Accumulation

Common Mistakes:

• Price shifts lower highs within a re-accumulation cycle while following to break key lows that would
signal a market structure shift.
• 價格在重新積累週期內走低⾼點(HL)，同時隨後突破關鍵低點，這表明市場結構發⽣了變化。

• No valid structure break: Lower Highs are invalid.

• 沒有有效的結構突破：較低的⾼點無效。

• Higher low intact: market structure intact no valid market structure shift
• ⾼低完好：市場結構完好無有效市場結構轉變

• Confluence: Multiple Lows swept

• 匯合：橫掃多個低點

25
Valid Market Structure Break / 有效的市場結構破壞

When market structure breaks a key low as price trends. Price goes range bound into
distribution.
當市場結構作為價格趨勢突破關鍵低點時- 價格進入Distribution範圍。

Valid Market Structure Break / 有效的市場結構中斷：

• Key lows leading the trend are broken. Valid Market structure break with a new low put in
• Valid lower high proceeds
• 引領趨勢的關鍵低點被打破，有效的市場結構突破新低
• 有效的 Lower High

26
PriceAction(PA) - Supply/Demand vs Liquidity / 價格⾏為 - 供應/需求與流動性

Understanding Supply/Demand vs Liquidity / 了解供應/需求與流動性

Knowing what a Supply/Demand (SD) is and knowing how to use them are different.
Small writeup to provide clarity, to my perspective:
知道什麼是供應/需求 (SD) 和知道如何使⽤它們是不同的。
以我的觀點，為了提供清晰度⽽寫的⽂章：

- Improper use of Supply/Demand (SD) / SD使⽤不當

- Suggested Use of Supply/Demand (SD) / 建議使⽤ SD
- Conclusion

Standard Supply and Demand / 標準供需

• Price validates a Supply/Demand level when it breaks structure
• As long as there is a liquidity pocket/objective then the Supply/ Demand level is valid
• 價格在打破結構時驗證供應/需求區
• 只要有流動資⾦袋/⽬標，那麼供應/需求就是有效的

Liquidity Pockets / 流動資⾦袋

• Price moves from liquidity pockets to liquidity pockets (Swing point to Swing Point)
• Supply/Demand that forms between 2 liquidity pockets is irrelevant
• Price is seeking liquidity rather than looking to fill iceberg orders using SD levels
• 價格從流動資⾦袋移動到流動資⾦袋（擺動點到擺動點）
• 兩個流動資⾦袋之間形成的供應/需求是無關緊要的
• 價格正在尋求流動性，⽽不是尋求使⽤ SD 區間來填補⼤筆（冰⼭）訂單

27
Improper use of SD / SD使⽤不當

Price always has an objective. When you have 2 swing points/liquidity pockets we are
moving from one end to the other.
價格總是有⼀個⽬標， 當你有 2 個擺動點/流動資⾦袋時，我們正在從⼀端移動到另⼀端。
Mocking up SD levels between those 2 points will more then likely invalidate as price has
decided it will engineer stops
在這 2 個點之間模擬 SD 區間將更有可能無效，因為價格已經決定它將設計⽌損。

- Demand/Supply levels that from between 2 liquidity points are irrelevant

- Price is attracted to the opposing side of liquidity
- 2 個流動性點之間的需求/供應區間無關緊要
- 價格被吸引到流動性的對立⾯

28
Suggested use of SD levels / 建議使⽤ SD 級別

Normally how I mark up SD areas are at the bottom of a range/bottom-top of liquidity points.
As price taps demand/runs a low we then move onto the next area of liquidity/supply
invalidating all in-between.
通常我如何標記 SD 區域是在流動性點的範圍底部/頂部。
隨著價格觸及需求/運⾏低點，我們將進入下⼀個流動性/供應區域，使兩者之間的所有區域失效。

Proper Use of Supply/Demand / 正確使⽤供應/需求

- Supply/Demand levels above/below liquidity objectives offer the highest hit rate of those
levels being valid
- As long as there is an opposing side of liquidity the use of Supply/Demand is valid
- ⾼於/低於流動性⽬標的供應/需求⽔平提供有效⽔平的命中率
- 只要存在流動性的對立⾯，供應/需求的使⽤就有效

Conclusion
Ask yourself what price is attracted too. If you know how to draw a certain level without
context as to what the market is seeking this does not mean it will work and be applicable.
Knowing levels vs using judgement come into play.Context is key.
問問⾃⼰什麼價格也被吸引了。 如果您知道如何在沒有市場尋求什麼的情況下得出某個區
間，這並不意味著它會起作⽤並且適⽤。

29
Price Action - Alts / 價格⾏為 - 備選⽅案
This is how Alts have played out the last few weeks to my perspective and currently.
在我看來，這就是 Alts 在過去幾周和⽬前的表現。

1. Initial drive up (get people bullish) / 初始推⾼（讓⼈們看漲）

2. Sell off into HTF Demand (Sentiment flips bearish) / 賣出價格回到HTF需求區（市場情緒轉為看跌）
3. Price gets back above with trapped funds in lock. / 價格回升，做空資⾦套牢。

When you see price move up early in the week and sentiment favoring a certain side its good to zoom out and
mark out your untested HTF Demands as we might be engineering liquidity.
當您看到本週早些時候價格上漲並且情緒偏向某⼀⽅時，最好縮⼩倉位並標出您未經測試的 HTF 需求，因為可能
正在設計去獵取流動性。

30
31
Conclusion
Mark out your HTF Demands
Don't chase price but rather wait for certain elements to present themselves before entering. Requires patience
and discipline but the clarity in the move is much clearer.

Block out the noise and trade your system.

標出您的 HTF 需求區

不要追逐價格，⽽是在進入之前等待某些元素出現。 需要耐⼼和紀律，但⾏動中的清晰度要比平常更為清晰。

屏蔽噪⾳並遵循您的交易系統。

32