Professional Documents
Culture Documents
nonsense anyway?
Dave Coleman
Manager, Vehicle Evaluation and Technical Communication
30% better fuel economy by 2015 (vs. 2008)
Our Task Option 1: Bet on hybrids
CO2 emissions/unit
CO2 emissions/unit
Total vehicle volume Total vehicle volume
Option 2: Bet on electric Option 3: Improve every car we sell
CO2 emissions/unit
CO2 emissions/unit
Total vehicle volume Total vehicle volume
Development starts with a clean slate
FS Engine
Skyactiv-d
KL V6 Engine
Cyclone V6 Engine
Skyactiv-chassis
Skyactiv-Body
1983
FNR-series AT
Skyactiv-Drive
G-series MT
1980
Skyactiv-mt
F-series MT
AA6 MT
Contributors to 30% improvement
SKYACTIV-G
SKYACTIV-D
SKYACTIV-drive SKYACTIV-MT
Development targets
Increase rigidity 30%
Reduce weight 8%
Top crash safety performance
Previous SKYACTIV-body
Bent Frame Straight frame
Inefficient
load path Continuity
Current
SKYACTIV
Corners of a box
section are the
strongest parts, so
12-point box shape
offers “free” strength Rigidity enhanced
improvement.
SKYACTIV by removing flange
Front Crossmember Rear Crossmember
Weight: -6.4kg(14.1lb) -4.5kg(9.9lb)
Rigidity: 140% 100%
High-Tensile strength steel
1500MPa high-tensile
780/980MPa high-tensile
590MPa high-tensile
340/440MPa high-tensile
270MPa steel
Redefining platform flexibility No.3ク ス
リアフ ーム
Fixed: Bフ ーム
C
No.4ク ス
A B
D D
Fr.フ ーム C
A B
E E F F
No.4、5ク ス
Variable:
C-car
C-SUV
CD-car
Base
CD-SUV
Skyactiv Weight loss record so far
Exhaust Loss
40 Lose less of
Mechanical Loss that energy
20
There are still huge opportunities Actually
moving the car
for improved efficiency from
0
gasoline engines. 0 20 40 60 80 100
Engine Load (%)
Skyactiv-G engine Pursuing Ideal combustion
Knock is uncontrolled
combustion self-ignited by
the heat and pressure of
high compression.
Multi-injection strategy
Exhaust Loss
80
60
Cooling Loss
MZR L-series 2.0L MZR Z-series 1.3L Skyactiv-G 2.0L Skyactiv-G 1.3L
Heat release
Crank angle (deg.)
Crank angle (deg.)
Different combustion characteristics for each engine family Similar combustion characteristics for all displacements
Z-series MZR (1.3-1.5L) Scalable design from 1.3-2.5L
L-series MZR (1.8-2.5L)
L-series MZR with DI
L-series MZR with DI + Turbo
Result: huge engineering commitment to maintain Result: dramatically reduced development and
over 177 different engine calibrations calibration expense
CNC Machining cuts cost and enables flexibility
Diesel engine
I4 mid-size …
45 total machining processes 4 machining processes
Development Targets:
20% better fuel economy (vs. current Diesel)
More low-rpm torque and more high-rpm flexibility
Meet emissions standards around the world without
expensive urea injection
Lower cost than Hybrids
Skyactiv-D The Emissions challenge
Skyactiv-D
Low Compression Temperature
(Low Compression)
Fuel Spray Photograph O2 fuel soot
Fuel Directly
Droplet Shot
Image
Compression Ratio
250
construction Competitive
Time (sec)
Skyactiv-D the cold start challenge
More low-rpm torque, more high-rpm power, more flexible, more fun
Torque (lb.-ft.)
350 SKYACTIV-D
300
250
150
Torque improvement
100
Engine Speed
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
(rpm)
Skyactiv-D Wide, flexible powerband
Next Gen.
Skyactiv-D
DE Target
2.3L DISI Turbo
Gasoline Engine
The SKYACTIV engineering philosophy starts with a blank slate and an open mind.
SKYACTIV-drive
The M{zd{ way SKYACTIV-Drive
Smooth shifting
Mazda’s solution:
Use both torque converter and
clutch, depending on the situation.
Conventional AT SKYACTIV-Drive
Gear 3rd
Position 3
Engine
speed RPM Flares (Torque
converter slips)
Time →
Delay
Skyactiv-Drive Direct, connected feel
Skyactiv-Drive
Gear 3rd
Position 3
Engine
RPM
Time →
Improved fuel economy
Benefits
7% better fuel economy
More efficient than Dual Clutch
or CVT
6->3 60 mph
Drive
5->4 45 mph
6->5 70 mph
5->2 50 mph
Transmission
Dual Clutch
6->3 60 mph
5->4 45 mph
EU-A
6->5 70 mph
Shift response time (sec.) 0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25
The M{zd{ way SKYACTIV-Drive
SKYACTIV-MT
The Problem:
Shorter shift throws = heavier
45 mm
(1.8 in)
50 mm shift throws. Its simple leverage
(2.0 in)
Current The Mazda solution:
Mazda Low-friction
Short-travel shift spline detent
6MT Everything! Every part redesigned (from 9mm to 7.6mm) mechanism
for light effort and short travel.
Internal shift travel shortened 15%
Low-effort locking ball synchro
Gravity-assisted
R
shift mechanism
The Result
Shift stroke is the shortest of any
competitive passenger car, and
lighter than most.
(mm) 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35
(inches) 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4
The M{zd{ way Light & compact layout
SKYACTIV-MT
Weight (lb)
SKYACTIV-MT (lb.-ft.) 110 150 185 220 260 295 330 370
Skyactiv-mt Reduced Friction
Reduced Friction
Lower-viscosity oil (75W-
90 to 75W-80)
Ball bearings replace
tapered roller bearings
Oil distribution system
reduces fluid stirring
losses.