You are on page 1of 57

What’s all this Skyactiv

nonsense anyway?

Dave Coleman
Manager, Vehicle Evaluation and Technical Communication
30% better fuel economy by 2015 (vs. 2008)
Our Task Option 1: Bet on hybrids
CO2 emissions/unit

CO2 emissions/unit
Total vehicle volume Total vehicle volume
Option 2: Bet on electric Option 3: Improve every car we sell
CO2 emissions/unit

CO2 emissions/unit
Total vehicle volume Total vehicle volume
Development starts with a clean slate

B6 Engine BP Engine MZR Engine


Skyactiv-g

FS Engine
Skyactiv-d
KL V6 Engine
Cyclone V6 Engine

Skyactiv-chassis

Skyactiv-Body

1983
FNR-series AT
Skyactiv-Drive
G-series MT
1980
Skyactiv-mt
F-series MT
AA6 MT
Contributors to 30% improvement

SKYACTIV-G
SKYACTIV-D

SKYACTIV-drive SKYACTIV-MT

SKYACTIV-Body & Chassis


Skyactiv-body

Development targets
 Increase rigidity 30%
 Reduce weight 8%
 Top crash safety performance

Weight loss strategy


 Efficient structure
 High-tensile steel (no exotic materials yet)
 Common body structure concept across
many models
Efficient Structures

Previous SKYACTIV-body
Bent Frame Straight frame

Inefficient
load path Continuity

Broken load path


Efficient Structures

12-point box section Current Spot welds replaced


with MIG welds

Current

SKYACTIV
Corners of a box
section are the
strongest parts, so
12-point box shape
offers “free” strength Rigidity enhanced
improvement.
SKYACTIV by removing flange
Front Crossmember Rear Crossmember
Weight: -6.4kg(14.1lb) -4.5kg(9.9lb)
Rigidity: 140% 100%
High-Tensile strength steel

 Targeted use of high-tensile steels gives


high strength with low weight.
 Industry first use of 1800 MPa ultra-high
tensile steel (in bumpers.)
 61% of total body weight is some
form of high-tensile steel.

1500MPa high-tensile

780/980MPa high-tensile

590MPa high-tensile

340/440MPa high-tensile

270MPa steel
Redefining platform flexibility No.3ク ス
リアフ ーム

Fixed: Bフ ーム

C
No.4ク ス
A B
D D
Fr.フ ーム C
A B
E E F F

No.4、5ク ス

Variable:
C-car
C-SUV
CD-car
Base

CD-SUV
Skyactiv Weight loss record so far

 Lightest CX-5 vs lightest CX-7:

-130 kg (-288 lbs)


 Heaviest CX-5 vs Heaviest CX-7:

-261 kg (-575 lbs)


Skyactiv-G engine Ideal combustion + mechanical efficiency

Opportunities for improved efficiency


Radiation, Misfiring Loss
100

Exhaust Loss

Heat Energy Balance (%)


80 Capture more
combustion
energy
60
Cooling Loss

40 Lose less of
Mechanical Loss that energy
20
There are still huge opportunities Actually
moving the car
for improved efficiency from
0
gasoline engines. 0 20 40 60 80 100
Engine Load (%)
Skyactiv-G engine Pursuing Ideal combustion

Higher expansion ratio (and compression ratio)


is key factor in capturing combustion energy.
Efficiency vs. Compression Torque vs. Compression
Efficiency improvement (% BSFC)

Achieving those theoretical gains requires deep study of combustion fundamentals


Skyactiv-G engine What is knock?

Knock is uncontrolled
combustion self-ignited by
the heat and pressure of
high compression.

The Mazda Solutions


 Lower the temperature
before combustion
 Faster combustion so
there’s less ti e for k ock
to develop
Skyactiv-G engine Pursuing Ideal combustion

Advanced Direct Injection


Higher injection pressure (2,900 psi,) up
from 1,600 on previous DISI engine, and 43 on port
injected engines

Multi-injection strategy

6-hole injection pattern for optimum


fuel distribution

Spray-guided tumble flow of intake air


Skyactiv-G engine Pursuing Ideal combustion

Problem: Flame kernel contacts Solution: Combustion pocket


the piston, causing cooling loss
and slowing combustion (which
increases chance of knock)
Skyactiv-G engine Pursuing Ideal combustion

4-2-1 Exhaust Manifold:


Tuned exhaust manifold is as
important as advanced direct
injection and volcano-top
piston combined.

Compression with 87 AKI fuel:


Conventional 4-2-1
manifold manifold
12:1 13:1
(Mazda3) (CX-5)

Packaging requires coordination


with SKYACTIV-BODY
Skyactiv-G engine Pursuing Ideal combustion

New idea? Not really...


All race engines use this idea.
But this manifold puts the
catalyst too far away, so it
takes too long to heat up.
But we did it...

The Mazda Solutions


 Advanced DISI and combustion
pocket create stable, stratified
charge.
 Stable combustion allows retarded
ignition that doubles exhaust
temperature
Skyactiv-G engine Pursuing Mechanical Efficiency

Capture more energy


from combustion
EXPANSION RATIO Radiation, Misfiring Loss
14:1
100

Exhaust Loss
80

60
Cooling Loss

Lose less energy


40
on the way to the
Mechanical Loss wheels
20
Effective
Output
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Engine Load (%)
Skyactiv-G engine Pursuing Mechanical Efficiency

74% less oil pump drag


Friction reduction
through the “gram
strategy” approach 31% less water pump drag

25% less reciprocating drag

50% less valvetrain friction

27% less belt drive drag

20% less pumping loss


Skyactiv-G Open-throttle, Miller Cycle cruise

Intake valve timing is controlled


over a 70-degree range to allow
seamless switching between
conventional and open-throttle
Miller Cycle operation.

Leaving the intake valve open late


is more efficient than closing the
throttle. Pumping loss reduced by
20%
Skyactiv-G Diesel Efficiency from a gas engine
Redefining Engine family flexibility

Fixed elements: Variable elements:

MZR L-series 2.0L MZR Z-series 1.3L Skyactiv-G 2.0L Skyactiv-G 1.3L

Closed deck Open deck Same structure,


Bearing ladder Split Crankcase different size
Common combustion character simplifies calibration

Previous Engine Families SKYACTIV-G engines


Heat release

Heat release
Crank angle (deg.)
Crank angle (deg.)
Different combustion characteristics for each engine family Similar combustion characteristics for all displacements
Z-series MZR (1.3-1.5L) Scalable design from 1.3-2.5L
L-series MZR (1.8-2.5L)
L-series MZR with DI
L-series MZR with DI + Turbo

Result: huge engineering commitment to maintain Result: dramatically reduced development and
over 177 different engine calibrations calibration expense
CNC Machining cuts cost and enables flexibility

Old single-purpose machining process New CNC machining process


Gasoline
Small … Gasoline engine
I4
engine
Compact,

I4 Mid-size mid-size
Diesel engine
Gasoline engine I4 mid-size
V6 … V6

Diesel engine
I4 mid-size …
45 total machining processes 4 machining processes
Development Targets:
 20% better fuel economy (vs. current Diesel)
 More low-rpm torque and more high-rpm flexibility
 Meet emissions standards around the world without
expensive urea injection
 Lower cost than Hybrids
Skyactiv-D The Emissions challenge

The Diesel emissions challenge


Lean combustion causes NOx
Most NOx countermeasures cause soot
Urea injection fixes NOx, but is
expensive, inconvenient
Skyactiv-D The Emissions challenge

Current Diesel High Compression Temperature


(High Compression)
Fuel Spray Photograph O2 fuel soot
Fuel Directly
Droplet Shot
Image

Becomes leaner with time

Start 0.6ms 1.0ms 1.5ms


High temperature →NOx
Combustion Time Lack of oxygen → Soot
starts here

Diesel ignition occurs before the fuel is sufficiently mixed.


Local hot spots cause NOx and over-rich spots cause soot.
Skyactiv-D The Emissions challenge

Skyactiv-D
Low Compression Temperature
(Low Compression)
Fuel Spray Photograph O2 fuel soot
Fuel Directly
Droplet Shot
Image

Becomes leaner with time

Start 0.6ms 1.0ms 1.5ms

Better mixing = cleaner emissions


High-compression Skyactiv-D combustion
combustion

Lower compression gives more time to mix before ignition.


The result is clean combustion with low NOx and soot emissions
Skyactiv-D Low compression

Drawbacks to conventional diesels


 High compression causes ignition
before the air-fuel mixture is ideal
 Local heterogeneous combustion
 NOx and soot are formed

Advantages of 14:1 SKYACTIV-D


 Decreased compression temperature
and pressure
 More time available to form ideal
mixture prior to ignition
 Clean combustion with reduced
NOx and soot emissions
Skyactiv-D Low compression

Diesel engine breakthrough


The lowest compression ratio
available for a diesel engine in a
passenger car!
Enables ideal combustion timing

Compression Ratio

SKYACTIV-d Current Mazda


2.2L MZR-CD VW 2.0L TDI

SKYACTIV-D 14:1 16:1 16.5:1 18:1


Skyactiv-d Ideal combustion timing

Low compression enables Benefits of SKYACTIV-D:


ideal combustion timing near the
top of the piston stroke
20% less fuel consumption and
CO2 emissions compared to its
Higher expansion ratio predecessor!
improves power and fuel
economy

Current Mazda MZR-CD 2.2L


Small expansion ratio
SKYACTIV-D

High expansion ratio


The M{zd{ way Ideal combustion timing
Skyactiv-D Low compression = low friction

250

Current 2.2L Diesel


Low compression = lighter 200

construction Competitive

 New block, crank, rods and


150
Diesels
100
SKYACTIV-D
pistons reduce engine weight
50
by 10%
 Better handling
Competitive Gas Engines
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
E ngine S peed (rpm )

 Mechanical friction decreased


to gasoline engine levels
 5% Improvement in fuel
economy
 Lively engine response and
higher redline
Skyactiv-D the cold start challenge

Low compression makes cold starts difficult


 Solution #1: Intelligent, fast-acting ceramic glow plugs

Glow Plug Temp. (deg F)

Time (sec)
Skyactiv-D the cold start challenge

Low compression makes cold starts difficult


 Solution #2: super-fast 12-hole piezo injectors
Skyactiv-D the cold start challenge

Low compression makes cold starts difficult


 Solution #3: Patented Variable Valve Lift strategy.

 A special cold-start-only cam lobe


briefly opens the exhaust valve
during the intake stroke.
 Hot exhaust gasses warm the
intake charge for easier cold
combustion.
Skyactiv-D the cold start challenge

Series Sequential Twin Turbos


Skyactiv-D Wide, flexible powerband

More low-rpm torque, more high-rpm power, more flexible, more fun

Torque (lb.-ft.)
350 SKYACTIV-D

300

250

200 Current Mazda 2.2L DE (US)

150

Torque improvement
100
Engine Speed
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
(rpm)
Skyactiv-D Wide, flexible powerband

Next Gen.
Skyactiv-D
DE Target
2.3L DISI Turbo
Gasoline Engine

3rd party testing


scatter band
Torque

Current Mazda Next Gen. DE


2.2L Diesel Status

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000


Engine Speed (rpm)
Skyactiv-D Off-the-charts efficiency
The M{zd{ way SKYACTIV-Drive

The SKYACTIV engineering philosophy starts with a blank slate and an open mind.

Ideal Automatic Transmission


 High efficiency
 Direct, connected feel, like a
manual transmission
 Quick & responsive shifting
 Smooth shifting
 Easy, intuitive low-speed control
 Smooth & powerful launch

SKYACTIV-drive
The M{zd{ way SKYACTIV-Drive

Survey of Existing Technologies


Nothing can achieve Mazda’s needs
Dual Conventional Mazda Ideal
CVT Torque
Clutch Converter
Low-speed
Efficiency
High-speed

Direct, connected feel

Quick, responsive shifting

Smooth shifting

Easy low-speed control

Smooth, powerful launch


Challenge Overcome transmission losses

Conventional automatic problems:


 Torque converter slip
 Indirect feel - no connection
 Slow shifting
 Rough downshifts

Mazda’s solution:
Use both torque converter and
clutch, depending on the situation.

Redesign Hydraulic Control for


quick shifting
Solutions Multi-plate clutch + torque converter

Clutch and torque Damper


converter together
 Direct, connected feeling
Torus

 7% better fuel economy Lock-up Clutch


 Quiet and smooth

Conventional AT SKYACTIV-Drive

SKYACTIV-Drive torque converter/clutch assembly


Smaller torus only operates under 5mph
Larger, multi-plate clutch for more precise control
Larger damper to cancel vibrations caused by new low rpm,
high load conditions
Solutions Multi-plate clutch + torque converter
Conventional AT disconnected, slippy power delivery

Current Automatic Transmission

Torque converter slippage delays


100 Accelerator pedal is depressed acceleration response to driver’s input.
Throttle 50
position
0

Gear 3rd
Position 3

Engine
speed RPM Flares (Torque
converter slips)

Vehicle starts accelerating


3rd Gear
Vehicle
speed
}

Time →
Delay
Skyactiv-Drive Direct, connected feel

Skyactiv-Drive

Locked-up clutch provides direct,


100 Acceleratior pedal is depressed immediate response.
Throttle 50
position
0

Gear 3rd
Position 3

Engine
RPM

Vehicle accelerates without delay 3rd Gear


Vehicle
speed

Time →
Improved fuel economy

Benefits
7% better fuel economy
More efficient than Dual Clutch
or CVT

Transmission loss (lb.-ft.)

Top gear 1500rpm 60Nm @ 80 °


The M{zd{ way Smooth & quick shifting

The problem: The solution:


Tolerance stackup makes Gram-strategy approach to eliminate
transmission response inconsistent. delay and imprecision from every part.
The resulting shifts are slow and not Mechatronic module that’s individually
smooth enough. calibrated to compensate for
production tolerances.

The Result Integrated Mechatronic Module


Perfectly rev-matched downshifts
and smooth, seamless upshifts
Faster downshift response to
. gas pedal input
A drivetrain that responds to the
Direct linear solenoids
driver’s needs almost telepathically
The M{zd{ way Smooth & quick shifting

Shorter shift response time The Mazda solution


Faster downshifting than a dual New mechatronic module controls
clutch transmission the gear change process

Gear Speed Target Level


5->2 50 mph
SKYACTIV

6->3 60 mph
Drive

5->4 45 mph
6->5 70 mph
5->2 50 mph
Transmission
Dual Clutch

6->3 60 mph
5->4 45 mph
EU-A

6->5 70 mph
Shift response time (sec.) 0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25
The M{zd{ way SKYACTIV-Drive

Recap: how we did it

Target How SKYACTIV-DRIVE does it


 High efficiency
 Direct, connected feel, like a
Eliminate torque converter
slippage above 5 mph
manual transmission
 Quick & responsive shifting
Mechatronic module and high-
speed communication between
 Smooth shifting engine and trans
 Easy, intuitive low-speed control Still using the torque converter for
 Smooth & powerful launch what it does best.
Development targets
 Light and direct shift feel,
like the MX-5 Miata
 Light weight and compact size
 Better fuel economy
Challenges Light & crisp shift feel

SKYACTIV-MT
The Problem:
 Shorter shift throws = heavier
45 mm
(1.8 in)
50 mm shift throws. Its simple leverage
(2.0 in)
Current The Mazda solution:
Mazda Low-friction
Short-travel shift spline detent
6MT Everything! Every part redesigned (from 9mm to 7.6mm) mechanism
for light effort and short travel.
Internal shift travel shortened 15%
Low-effort locking ball synchro
Gravity-assisted
R
shift mechanism

Linear ball bearings


2
4 1
6 3
5 Locking ball

Gravity-assisted shift mechanism


synchro

Low-friction detent mechanism


Linear ball
bearings
The M{zd{ way Crisp & lightweight

The Result
Shift stroke is the shortest of any
competitive passenger car, and
lighter than most.

(mm) 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35
(inches) 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4
The M{zd{ way Light & compact layout

Torque capacity vs. weight Transmission efficiency


SKYACTIV-MT combines high Both SKYACTIV-MT versions
torque capacity with minimized achieve best-in-class
weight performance

SKYACTIV-MT

Weight (lb)
SKYACTIV-MT (lb.-ft.) 110 150 185 220 260 295 330 370
Skyactiv-mt Reduced Friction

Reduced Friction
 Lower-viscosity oil (75W-
90 to 75W-80)
 Ball bearings replace
tapered roller bearings
 Oil distribution system
reduces fluid stirring
losses.

You might also like