1

Public view of the Police and Violence

Student's Name

Institutional Affiliation

Course Code and Name

Professor's Name

Date
 2

Public view of the Police and Violence

The study by Davila, Hartley and Brown represents an investigation of people 'attitudes

to the police and violence.Its novelty lies precisely in examining from both sides- agents or

victims of violence, respectively-the police. This is a critical commentary on the author 'method,

article style and point of view.

Author's Approach

The authors 'explorations of public perceptions also gain a methodological depth through

this quantitative approach. In order to capture as wide a range of opinions as possible, the study

uses survey data derived from a nationally representative sample. This strengthens the external

validity of its findings. The authors 'commitment to an empirical focus shaped their

methodology, which used descriptive and regressional analyses of bivariate correlations and

multivariate linear relationships (Davila et al., 2023). One of its main points is that it describes

both police brutality and violence against the police. It contains a completed perspective, one that

includes everything about people's perceptions. The authors' blurring of the line between

perpetrator and victim takes a step beyond an overly rigid division, leaving readers with a clearer

window onto some threads woven into public opinion towards law enforcers.

Varied statistical analyses enrich the research. With descriptive analyses providing a

preliminary sketch of the entire public terrain, bivariate correlational analyses examining

interrelationships between variables, and multivariate regression analysis controlling for

confounding factors, there is less to be drawn in black-and-white terms from their results. The

study's rigor is enhanced through the use of different methodologies, and again thoroughly

investigates what gives rise to public opinions.

 3

The authors 'use of a quantitative approach and their application of various statistical

methods enhances the study's credibility and thoroughness. According to Davila et al. (2023), the

two sides of the issue, which are violence against the police and violence against police officers,

demonstrate a grasp of the complexity of the situation. However, a comprehensive and balanced

research approach incorporating quantitative analyses and qualitative observations might have

painted a more complete picture of the complex forces behind public perceptions.

Format of the Article

The article is written in a fixed format; its abstract, research purpose, and methodology

description are clear. Statistical analyses give the research added rigor. The findings are

presented logically, from description to bivariate and multivariate analyses. The ordered method

helps readers understand. The purpose statement is stated front and center, plainly stating the

study's aim of obtaining an overall grasp of public opinion about the police and violence. With

this clear statement upfront, the researcher then leads the reader through the chief focal points of

the study, clarifying the research goals.The methodology is described in a straightforward and

comprehensive way, allowing readers to assess the study's reliability and validity (Davila et al.,

2023).In doing so, the authors allow other researchers to reproduce the study or to use it as a

basis for further research, helping to make scientific inquiry cumulative.

An impressive aspect of the article is its logical presentation of findings. But the

progression from descriptive analyses of broad contours of public perceptions to bivariate

correlation analyses that seek to establish relationships between variables, and finally to

multivariate regression analyses, which consider several factors and complexes of factors,

betokens a systematic, thoughtful attitude (Davila et al.,2023). This systematic advance gradually
 4

increases reader understanding, permitting professionals and amateurs alike to follow the

research and engage with the results at various degrees of analytical depth.

Point of View

The authors take a neutral and objective stance in this article, using largely empirical

evidence to support their assertions. At the same time, however, it is essential to acknowledge

that the responses to surveys are influenced by social and cultural perceptions. A discussion of

the limitations and possible biases in the study would have added to the transparency of this

research.

Missing Material

The study is tightly conducted, but the authors could have dug deeper into the qualitative

aspects of public understanding. A qualitative form, like interviews or focus groups, may have

shed some light on why those perceptions exist. Besides, investigating regional differences in

attitudes would make the study more practical.

Additional Relevant Facts or Points of View

The authors center on demographic factors, including age, skin color, and police

harassment. On the other hand, a closer look at socioeconomic conditions, educational levels,

and geography would have made for a richer analysis (Davila et al., 2023). Instead of focusing

on the media's influence over perceptions, better understanding the contextual factors might have

given a fuller picture.

Conclusion

Thus, the study contributes importantly to understanding public attitudes toward police

and violence. The quantitative approach is sound, but qualitative insights and exploration of

other related factors further consolidate the study. The objectivity of the authors about their
 5

subject, coupled with the utilization of nationally representative data, lends weight to the results.

However, considering possible limitations and unanswered questions helps focus future

exploration of this complex field.

Unresolved Questions

1. Why does the belief in mistreatment have such a profound influence on both police

aggression and attacks against the police?

2. According to the study, is there really no common link between concern about police

violence and worry over attacks on the police?

3. Is it that there are actually such social factors underlying the split in public opinion on

police violence and attacks on the police?

4. What shifts in the public perceptions of mistreatment and how it can affect police

matters?
 6

Reference

Davila, M. A., Hartley, D. J., & Brown, B. (2023). Public perceptions of the police and violence:

an examination of both sides of the issue. Policing: An International Journal, 46(5/6),

709-723. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/PIJPSM-03-2023-0041/

full/html