Research Proposal

The Impact Of Online Learning On Student

Performance Analysis

Student Name: Nguyễn Hữu Khang

Student ID : BAFNIU20307
Course : BusinessResearchMethod Lecturer
: Prof.NguyenVanPhuong

1. Introduction
In the ever-evolving landscape of education, the surge in online learning has
become a transformative force, reshaping the way students engage with
academic content. As universities globally transition to digital platforms, it is
imperative to examine the impact of online learning on student performance
comprehensively. This introduction lays the groundwork for our research,
weaving together insights from key studies to frame the significance of our
investigation.

1.1. Summarize Previous Studies

The trajectory of online education research has been marked by diverse
findings, prompting a closer examination of the factors influencing student
outcomes. Sharma and Singh's (2019) exploration into the impact of online
education at the university level underscores the complexity of online learning
environments. By highlighting the intricacies of student experiences, their study
emphasizes the need for nuanced investigations, aligning with the multifaceted
nature of our research.

1.2. Introduce Research Context

As the prevalence of online learning continues to rise, understanding its
influence on student performance becomes a pressing concern. Li and Wang's
(2021) research delves into the relationship between technological proficiency
and academic achievement, indicating a crucial link between technology
readiness and success in digital education. In the context of this evolving
educational landscape, our study aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse on
online learning and student outcomes.

1.3. Arguments and Research Gaps

Building upon the findings of previous studies, there emerges a gap in
understanding specific variables such as technological readiness, course design,
and student engagement in the context of online learning. The comparative
study by Hasan et al. (2021) prompts us to consider cross-cultural influences,
while
Zhang et al.'s (2022) comprehensive exploration of online learning effects
provides a foundation for our proposed model. Our study aims to bridge these
gaps by investigating these factors comprehensively and their collective impact
on student performance.

1.4. Research Objectives

Our research objectives align with the identified gaps and the need for a
nuanced exploration of online learning effects:
- To identify the influence of technological readiness on academic success in an
online learning environment.
- To assess the impact of course design features on student engagement and
subsequent performance.
- To understand the interplay between student engagement metrics and overall
academic achievement.

1.5. Research Questions

Guiding our investigation are the following research questions:
1.How does technological readiness contribute to academic success in online
courses?
2.What are the effects of specific course design elements on student engagement
and performance?
3.How does student engagement, measured by participation and completion
metrics, correlate with academic achievement in online learning?

1.6. Proposal Structure

 2. Literature Review
The literature review serves as the foundation for our research, drawing insights
from key studies to establish the context, identify gaps, and inform the
development of our proposed model.

2.1. Sharma et al. (2019)

Sharma and Singh's study delves into the impact of online education on students'
learning at the university level. Their exploration of online learning
environments highlights the complexity of factors influencing student outcomes.
Specifically, their findings underscore the importance of considering the unique
aspects of online education, a perspective that resonates with the multifaceted
nature of our study.

2.2. Li and Wang (2021)

Li and Wang contribute valuable insights into the relationship between
technological proficiency and student performance. By examining the impact of
online learning on student engagement and academic achievement, their
research establishes a crucial link between technology readiness and success in
digital education. Our study builds upon this foundation by incorporating
technological proficiency as a key variable in our proposed model.

2.3. Hasan et al. (2021)

The work by Hasan and colleagues, comparing the effects of online learning
between UK and Jordanian universities, provides a cross-cultural perspective.
This study is pivotal in highlighting the contextual differences that may
influence student performance in diverse online learning settings. Incorporating
such crosscultural considerations into our research ensures a nuanced
understanding of the factors at play.

2.4. Zhang et al. (2022)

Zhang et al.'s research comprehensively explores the effects of online learning
on students' performance and engagement. Their study incorporates both
quantitative and qualitative methods, providing a balanced approach that aligns
with our research design. The emphasis on the student experience and
engagement metrics in their work informs our qualitative and quantitative data
collection methods.

2.5. Comparative Studies

Building on the comparative approach employed by Hasan et al. (2021) and Li
and Wang (2021), our literature review extends to additional comparative
studies. A comparison between UK and Jordanian universities by Hasan et al.
prompts us to consider cultural nuances, while Li and Wang's examination of
online learning effects offers a comparative perspective on student engagement
and academic outcomes.

2.6. Instructional Design Frameworks

To inform our proposed model's focus on course design, we draw on
instructional design frameworks discussed by Zhang et al. (2022) and other key
sources. These frameworks offer valuable insights into the elements that
contribute to effective instructional design, guiding our exploration of how
course design influences student engagement and performance.

In synthesizing these studies, our literature review establishes the need for a
comprehensive examination of the impact of online learning on student
performance. The diverse insights from these sources inform our proposed
model, which integrates technological readiness, course design, and student
engagement as key variables in understanding the complex dynamics of online
education. This approach aims to contribute to the existing body of knowledge
and address identified gaps in the literature.

3. Methodology
3.1. Data Collection
The study will employ a meticulous and comprehensive data collection
approach, ensuring the inclusion of diverse perspectives from university
students engaged in online courses.

Survey Instrument: Drawing from validated scales used in Li and Wang's (2021)
research, the survey questionnaire will include Likert-type scales to
quantitatively measure participants' self-perceived technological proficiency,
satisfaction with course design, and self-reported engagement metrics. For
example, questions assessing technological proficiency may mirror those used
by Li and Wang, enabling direct comparisons with their findings.
The survey will also incorporate open-ended questions, allowing participants to
provide qualitative insights regarding specific challenges faced in online
learning, their perceptions of effective instructional designs, and the influence of
online learning on their academic performance.

Interviews: Semi-structured interviews will provide a platform for in-depth

exploration of qualitative nuances. Drawing inspiration from Sharma et al.
(2019) and Zhang et al. (2022), the interview process will involve probing
questions aimed at uncovering rich narratives regarding technological
challenges, the emotional impact of online learning, and the perceived
effectiveness of different instructional designs.
3.2. Study Method (Qualitative)
Qualitative data from interviews and open-ended survey responses will be
subjected to a rigorous thematic analysis, aligning with the approach employed
by Sharma et al. (2019). The coding process will involve identifying patterns,
recurring themes, and salient insights within the qualitative data.

For instance, qualitative findings may reveal common themes such as

"Technological Adaptation," "Engagement Strategies," or "Emotional
Resilience," offering a deeper understanding of the subjective experiences of
students in the online learning environment.
3.3. Measurement
Quantitative data from surveys will be analyzed using descriptive statistics,
including means and standard deviations, to provide a quantitative snapshot of
participants' technological proficiency, satisfaction with course design, and
selfreported engagement levels.

Qualitative insights derived from interviews and open-ended survey responses

will be quantified using a coding framework. For example, the frequency of
specific themes related to challenges in online learning or effective instructional
design strategies will be tallied, providing numerical support to qualitative
narratives.

4. References

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334720838_Study_of_the_Impact_of_
Online_Education_on_Student's_learning_at_University_Level_in
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-021-10740-8
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33935878/#&gid=article-figures&pid=figure-
1-uid-0 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355574283_The_Effects_of_Online_
Learning_on_Students'_Performance_A_Comparison_between_UK_and_Jorda
nian_Universities
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2022.820567/full
https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/74314
Mintu-Wimsatt, A., Sadler, T., & Ingram, K. (2007). Creativity in online
courses: Perceptions of
MBA students. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(4),
324330.
Mohan, K.B, (2010). “Teaching and learning with technology: beyond
constructivism", published by tailer and Francis UK.
Navarro, P., & Shoemaker, J. (2000). Performance and perceptions of
distance learners in
cyberspace. American Journal of Distance Education,14(2), 15-35.
Oye, N. A., Iahad, N., Madar, M. J., & Rahim, N. (2012). The impact of
elearning on students’
performance in tertiary institutions. International Journal of Computer
Networks and Wireless
Communications, 2(2), 121-130.
Singh, E. (2014). Learning theory and online technologies. Open
Learning: The Journal of
Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(1), 89-92.
Sidman, C. L., Fiala, K. A., & D’Abundo, M. L. (2011). Exercise motivation of
college students in online, face-to-face, and blended basic studies physical
activity and wellness course delivery formats. Journal of American college
health, 59(7), 662-664.
Strommen, E. F., & Lincoln, B. (1992). Constructivism, technology, and the
future of classroom learning. Education and Urban Society, 24(4), 466-476.
Stewart, C. M., Schifter, C. C., & Selverian, M. E. M. (Eds.). (2010).Teaching
and learning with technology: Beyond Constructivism. Routledge.
Tsai, C. W. (2013). An effective online teaching method: The
combination of collaborative learning with initiation and self-regulation
learning with feedback. Behaviour & Information
Technology, 32(7), 712-723.
Urdan, T. A., & Weggen, C. C. (2000). Corporate e-learning: Exploring a new
frontier.
Volery, T., & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online
education.International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 216-223.
Zhang, Y., & Espinoza, S. (1998). Relationships among computer self-efficacy,
attitudes toward
computers, and desirability of learning computing skills. Journal of Research on
Computing in
Education, 30(4), 420-436.