You are on page 1of 7

Korea-Australia Rheology Journal, 32(4), 243-249 (November 2020) www.springer.

com/13367
DOI: 10.1007/s13367-020-0023-4

Controlling the emulsion stability of cosmetics through shear mixing process


Kwang-Mo Kim1, Hee Muk Oh1 and Jun Hyup Lee2,*
1
Cosmax R&I Center, Cosmax, Seongnam 13486, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Republic of Korea
(Received May 2, 2020; accepted July 17, 2020)

The manipulation of emulsion stability for kinetically sustainable cosmetic emulsions is an important tech-
nology in cosmetic industry, however the relationship between emulsifying process and long-term emulsion
stability has not been elucidated. Herein, the effect of shear mixing process on the stability of oil-in-water
cosmetic emulsions is investigated by varying the shear mixing rate, emulsification time, and water phase
temperature. The analysis on droplet size distribution and shear viscosity revealed that the strong viscous
forces at optimal shear mixing rate of 4000 rpm afforded the fine and uniform droplets for cosmetic emul-
sions, leading to the improvement of long-term emulsion stability. Moreover, since the prolonged shear mix-
ing induced the destabilization of emulsion droplets through droplet coalescence, optimal shear mixing time
of 3 min could improve the kinetic stability of cosmetic emulsions. The dependence of long-term emulsion
stability on emulsification temperature was relatively low. The theoretical analysis using the Derjaguin-Lan-
dau-Verwey-Overbeek theory demonstrated that the shear mixing rate played a major role in sustaining fine
and uniform cosmetic emulsions with long-term stability. The present study can greatly contribute to the
fabrication of functional cosmetic emulsions with long-term stability by controlling the shear mixing param-
eters in simple emulsification process.
Keywords: cosmetics, emulsions, long-term stability, shear mixing process, viscosity

1. Introduction Nevertheless, due to complex interfacial and rheological


phenomena, the effective formation control of stable
Emulsions with dynamic inhomogeneous structures emulsions is still under way.
have received much attention due to a wide range of In a rapidly changing field of cosmetics, a variety of
potential applications in cosmetics, foods, paints, pharma- cosmetic emulsions are utilized for functional applications
ceuticals, ink coatings, and adhesives (Goodarzi and Zen- such as sebum control, skin whitening, and UV protection.
dehboudi, 2019). The emulsion system is normally com- Cosmetic emulsions are mainly classified as oil-in-water
posed of two or more immiscible liquid phases, where one (O/W), water-in-oil (W/O) or water-in-silicone (W/S)
of the liquids is dispersed into small spherical droplets in emulsions according to the dispersion method, and O/W
another continuous fluid. The key to forming a homoge- emulsion is the most commonly used one in the cosmetic
neous emulsion is to distribute the uniform and stable industry (Tal-Figiel, 2007; Ontiveros et al., 2014; Gilbert
droplets in the continuous phase. However, since liquid et al., 2013; Ozturk and McClements, 2016; Glampedaki
phases have different surface tensions, common emulsions and Dutschk, 2014; Rayner et al., 2014; Lupi et al., 2015;
are inherently thermodynamically unstable and are easily Mine et al., 1996). Since common cosmetic emulsions are
separated through flocculation, creaming, coagulation, not simple two-phase systems but polydisperse multi-
coalescence, phase inversion, and Oswald ripening when component mixtures containing various types of surfac-
simply mixed without any surface active agents (Tchola- tants, co-surfactants, and other additives, these emulsion
kova et al., 2006; Dukhin et al., 2001; Kong et al., 2003; systems are difficult to understand and predict their emul-
Kumar et al., 1996; Shields et al., 2001; Nii et al., 2009; sifying behavior. Moreover, a long-term stability of emul-
Dyab, 2012; Tadros, 1994). To overcome this problem, the sions should be guaranteed to minimize the change in their
most common approach is to reduce the difference in sur- properties over time. Although some studies related on the
face tension between different phases and thus stabilize rheological behavior of emulsions have been conducted
emulsions by enhancing their kinetic stability using emul- on cosmetic emulsions (Pal, 1993; Princen, 1985), the
sifiers involving surfactants and co-surfactants (Mason et relationship between emulsifying process and emulsion
al., 2006; Gullapalli and Sheth, 1999). In addition, various stability has not been examined rheologically.
physical approaches such as ball-milling and sonication In this study, the effect of shear mixing process on the
have been reported (Liu et al., 2018; Bilati et al., 2003). physical stability of oil-in-water emulsions is examined to
achieve the optimal emulsifying condition for long-term
*Corresponding author; E-mail: junhyuplee@ssu.ac.kr
stable emulsions. The model O/W emulsions composed of

© 2020 The Korean Society of Rheology and Springer pISSN 1226-119X eISSN 2093-7660 243
Kwang-Mo Kim, Hee Muk Oh and Jun Hyup Lee

common cosmetic ingredients were prepared by varying (5.0 g), caprylyl glycol (1.0 g), cetyl ethylhexanoate (20.0
the shear mixing rate, emulsification time, and water g), and triisostearin (10.0 g). After heating the oil phase at
phase temperature, and their rheological properties such as 70°C, the oil phase was added to the water phase, and
shear viscosity and emulsion viscosity were investigated. emulsification was performed using T.K. homogenizer
In addition, their emulsification behavior was analyzed by mark II model 2.5 (Primex, Japan). The shear mixing
measurement of droplet shape, size, and distribution speed was varied in the range between 2000 and 8000
according to the shear mixing conditions. To reveal the rpm. In addition, emulsification process time and water
relationship between shear mixing parameters and long- phase temperature were adjusted with different values of
term emulsion stability, the change in emulsion viscosity 1-30 min and 50-70°C, respectively. Finally, the prepared
was examined for 6 months, and the theoretical analysis emulsions were cooled to 30°C. All experiments were
on the governing parameters in shear mixing was con- repeated three times.
ducted using the Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek
(DLVO) theory. 2.3. Characterization
The solution viscosities of the fabricated O/W emulsions
2. Experimental were obtained using a Brookfield viscometer (Rotation
viscometer, DV2TLV). Spindle 64 was used at a speed of
2.1. Materials 12 rpm for 1 min to measure the viscosity. To investigate
Disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) was the long-term stability of the emulsions, the change in
purchased from Akzonovel, Netherlands. Tromethamine emulsion viscosity was measured for 6 months. The shape
was obtained from ANGUS, USA. Carbomer was pur- of the droplets in O/W emulsions was observed at a mag-
chased from Noveon Inc., USA. 1,2-Hexanediol was sup- nification of 400 using an optical microscope (BX53T-
plied by Symrise AG, Germany. Glyceryl stearate was 32F01, Olympus, Japan). A small amount of emulsion
purchased from Kwang Il Co., South Korea. PEG-100 was loaded onto a glass slide and then a cover glass was
stearate was purchased from Croda, USA. Cetearyl alco- put on top of the emulsion for the droplet observation. The
hol was purchased from Kao Chemicals, Japan. Caprylyl average droplet size and distribution of the emulsions
glycol was purchased from Evonik, Germany. Cetyl etyl- were obtained using a laser diffraction particle size ana-
hexanoate was supplied by Miwon Commercial Co., Ltd, lyzer (LA-960, Horiba, Japan). The emulsion was diluted
South Korea. Triisostearin was purchased from Ohsung with distilled water (10%, w/v) and placed in a sample
Chemicals Ind. Co., Ltd., South Korea. bath. Rheological analysis was conducted on a rheometer
(MCR 92, Anton Paar, Austria). The diameter of the
2.2. Cosmetic emulsion fabrication parallel plate was 25 mm, and the shear rate ranged from
The model oil-in-water emulsions were prepared with 102 to 103 s1.
common cosmetic ingredients. The water phase was com-
posed of disodium EDTA (0.09 g), tromethamine (0.35 g), 3. Results and Discussion
carbomer (0.5 g), 1,2-hexanediol (7.5 g), and deionized
water (443.06 g). The oil phase was made up of glyceryl 3.1. Effect of shear mixing rate on cosmetic emul-
stearate (7.5 g), PEG-100 stearate (5.0 g), cetearyl alcohol sion stability

Fig. 1. (Color online) Optical microscopic images of O/W emulsions prepared at (a) 2000, (b) 4000, and (c) 8000 rpm. The change
in droplet shape for (d) 2000, (e) 4000, and (f) 8000 rpm was measured after 1 month.

244 Korea-Australia Rheology J., 32(4), 2020


Controlling the emulsion stability of cosmetics through shear mixing process

To examine the effect of shear mixing rate on the phys-


ical stability of O/W emulsions, emulsification was per-
formed under different shear conditions of 2000, 4000,
and 8000 rpm. The water phase temperature and emulsi-
fication process time were 70°C and 5 min, respectively.
Figure 1 shows the optical microscopic images of emul-
sions after emulsification and 1 month. As the shear mix-
ing speed increased, the initial droplet size of emulsions
was decreased, as shown in Figs. 1a, 1b, and 1c. While the
cosmetic emulsions fabricated at low shear mixing rates of
2000 and 4000 rpm maintained the droplet shape and size
distribution even after 1 month, the droplet coalescence or
flocculation was observed for high shear mixing condi-
tion, as shown in Figs. 1d, 1e, and 1f. Since the dynamics
of tiny droplets in high shear rate is dominated by Brown- Fig. 3. (Color online) Dependence of apparent viscosity on shear
ian motion, active Brownian motion of very small emul- rate for cosmetic emulsions under different shear mixing rates
sion droplets gives rise to droplet coalescence through after 1 month.
flocculation, leading to the long-term instability of cos-
metic emulsions (Toro-Mendoza and Petsev, 2010; Urbina- term emulsion stability.
Villalba, 2009). In order to confirm the physical stability of O/W emul-
The droplet size distribution analysis supported the sions prepared under different shear mixing rates, apparent
emulsion instability at high shear condition, as shown in viscosity depending on shear rate was measured after 1
Fig. 2. Even after 1 month, the O/W emulsions prepared month, as shown in Fig. 3. Since the prepared emulsions
at low shear mixing rates of 2000 and 4000 rpm exhibited have a high concentration of dispersed oil phase (9.7
uniform size distributions of fine droplets with average wt.%), shear thinning behavior was observed for all O/W
droplet size of 8 and 5 μm, respectively. On the contrary, emulsions (Pal, 2000). The apparent viscosity of shear-
asymmetric bimodal size distribution of emulsion droplets thinning emulsions was profoundly affected by the emul-
with average droplet size of 0.5 and 23 μm, which cor- sion droplet size. Considering the aged emulsions for, with
respond to emulsion droplets after emulsification and 1 decreasing droplet size, 8000, 2000, and 4000 rpm, an
month, respectively, was observed for high shear condi- increase in the shear viscosity was observed with the
tion of 8000 rpm. The relative high intensity peak for decrease in emulsion droplet size. Moreover, the degree of
coarse droplets strongly indicates the existence of consid- shear thinning was enhanced when the droplet size was
erable droplet coalescence during 1 month. Thus, high reduced. This rheological behavior of cosmetic O/W
shear mixing rate in emulsification of cosmetic O/W emulsions is in accordance with the literature (Pal, 1996).
emulsion accelerates coalescence of tiny droplets through Therefore, the optimal shear mixing rate of 4000 rpm pro-
Brownian flocculation, leading to the decrease in the long- vided fine and stable droplets for cosmetic O/W emul-
sions, leading to the increase in the viscosity of the
medium, which helps maintain the long-term stability of
dispersed droplets.
To identify the flow patterns of emulsification under dif-
ferent shear mixing rates, the Reynolds number was cal-
culated as follows:
2
d n
Re = --------------- (1)

where d is the diameter of the homomixer (m), n is the
rotation speed of the homomixer (s1), ρ is the emulsion
density (kg∙m3), and μ is the emulsion viscosity (Pa∙s). As
listed in Table 1, low shear mixing rates of 2000 and 4000
rpm exhibited laminar flow for emulsification, whereas
transient mixing flow was observed for high shear speed
of 8000 rpm. Since strong inertial forces at high Reynolds
Fig. 2. (Color online) Droplet size distribution of emulsions pre- number induce flow instabilities under emulsification and
pared under different shear mixing rates after 1 month. thus produce unstable and nonuniform droplets (Goodarzi

Korea-Australia Rheology J., 32(4), 2020 245


Kwang-Mo Kim, Hee Muk Oh and Jun Hyup Lee

Table 1. Reynolds number for emulsions prepared under different shear mixing rates.
Shear speed (rpm) d (m) n (s1) ρ (kg m3) µ (Pa·s) Re Flow
2000 0.04 33.3 1000 0.833 201 Laminar
4000 0.04 66.7 1000 0.615 545 Laminar
8000 0.04 133.3 1000 0.230 2914 Transient

and Zendehboudi, 2019), the strong viscous forces at low


Reynolds number is an effective way to achieve the stable
and uniform droplets for cosmetic emulsions.

3.2. Effect of shear mixing time on cosmetic emul-


sion stability
To investigate the effect of shear mixing time on the
physical stability of O/W emulsions, emulsification was
conducted under different mixing time of 1-30 min. The
shear mixing rate and water phase temperature were 8000
rpm and 70°C, respectively. Figure 4 depicts the optical
microscopic images of emulsions prepared under different
shear mixing time. At the initial emulsification stage of 1
min, large droplets were broken into small droplets with a
nonuniform size distribution. After that, fine droplets with
uniform size distributions were formed during emulsifica-
tion for 3 and 5 min. However, the prolonged shear mix-
ing induced the destabilization of emulsions through
droplet flocculation after 7 min. Finally, droplet coales-
cence occurred at the long agitation time of 30 min. Since
smaller droplets exhibited a greater propensity for the for-
mation of partially coalesced droplets through van der
Waals attraction forces at a high concentration of the dis- Fig. 5. Droplet size distribution of emulsions prepared under dif-
persed phase (Kaganyuk and Mohraz, 2019; Goodarzi and ferent shear mixing time.
Zendehboudi, 2019), optimal shear mixing time of 3-5
min is needed for stable cosmetic emulsions. The depen- 5 min, the average droplet size of emulsions decreased to
dence of droplet size distribution on shear mixing time about 0.4 μm. However, after 7 min, an increase in droplet
was in accordance with microscopic observations, as size of emulsions with broad size distribution was observed
shown in Fig. 5. As the shear mixing time increased up to and further asymmetric bimodal size distributions com-

Fig. 4. (Color online) Optical microscopic images of O/W emulsions mixed for (a) 1, (b) 3, (c) 5, (d) 7, (e) 9, and (f) 30 min.

246 Korea-Australia Rheology J., 32(4), 2020


Controlling the emulsion stability of cosmetics through shear mixing process

prising both fine and coarse droplets were obtained for


prolonged mixing conditions, indicating the existence of
droplet coalescence. As a consequence, suitable shear
mixing time of 3-5 min in emulsification process can
reduce the instability of O/W emulsions through forma-
tion of fine and stable droplets, and thereby increase the
kinetic stability of cosmetic emulsions.

3.3. Long-term stability of cosmetic emulsions depend-


ing on shear mixing conditions
To examine the effect of shear mixing conditions on the
long-term stability of cosmetic O/W emulsions, the change
in emulsion viscosity over time was analyzed for 6
months, as shown in Fig. 6. The shear mixing rate of 4000
Fig. 7. (Color online) Viscosity reduction rate of cosmetic emul-
and 8000 rpm, water phase temperature of 50 and 70°C, sions for various emulsification conditions.
and shear mixing time of 3 and 5 min were employed as
key process variables for long-term stable emulsions.
Since common O/W emulsions are inherently thermody- temperature and shear mixing time had a relatively small
namically unstable, a decrease in viscosity over time stem- effect on long-term stability of cosmetic emulsions. Figure
ming from destabilization of emulsion droplets was 7 clearly shows that high shear mixing rate leads to a large
observed for all cosmetic emulsions (Pal, 1993). During viscosity reduction of cosmetic emulsions (about 60-75%)
60 days, an abrupt reduction in emulsion viscosity was during 6 months compared to that of low shear rate, and
observed for high shear mixing rate of 8000 rpm, whereas relatively long shear mixing time of 5 min has a negative
low shear condition of 4000 rpm showed relatively small effect on long-term stability of emulsions at the same
drop in viscosity. In addition, while the saturation behav- shear mixing rate and water phase temperature. Thus,
ior in viscosity was detected for 4000 rpm after 2 months, shear mixing rate in the emulsification process was found
high shear mixing rate exhibited the continuous decrease to be the most critical factor in determining the long-term
in emulsion viscosity. Compared to shear mixing rate, all stability of cosmetic O/W emulsions. The low shear mix-
other emulsification parameters involving water phase ing rate of 4000 rpm and low process time of 3 min can

Fig. 6. (Color online) Long-term viscosity profiles of cosmetic emulsions for various emulsification conditions: Water phase tempera-
ture and shear mixing time of (a) 50°C and 3 min, (b) 50°C and 5 min, (c) 70°C and 3 min, (d) 70°C and 5 min.

Korea-Australia Rheology J., 32(4), 2020 247


Kwang-Mo Kim, Hee Muk Oh and Jun Hyup Lee

reduce the destabilization of droplets over time by main- rate and time. As shear mixing rate changed from 4000 to
taining the emulsion viscosity, leading to the increase in 8000 rpm, a decrease in droplet size from 5.0 to 0.5 μm
kinetic stability of emulsions. was exhibited and thus the long-term stability of cosmetic
emulsion decreased over time. Furthermore, since pro-
3.4. Theoretical analysis on the governing parame- longed shear mixing provided tiny droplets for cosmetic
ters for stability of cosmetic emulsions emulsions, relatively low emulsion stability was observed
To comprehend the theoretical factors governing the sta- for long shear mixing time. Contrary to droplet size, the
bility of cosmetic emulsions, total potential energy dependence of energy barrier on temperature was rela-
depending on droplet size and temperature was calculated tively low, which accords with our experimental results on
as follows using the Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek long-term stability and literature (Chanamai and McCle-
(DLVO) theory (Boström et al., 2006): ments, 2000). As a consequence, the shear mixing rate
2 –1 plays a great role in creating and maintaining fine and uni-
20 r ln  1 + exp  –h/   A12 r
V = VR + VA = ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- + -----------------
- (2) form cosmetic emulsions with long-term stability.
kB T 12hkB T
where VR is the electrostatic repulsion term, VA is the van 4. Conclusions
der Waals attraction term, ε0 is the permittivity of vacuum
(8.85 × 1012 F·m1), ε is the dielectric constant of water The relationship between shear mixing parameters and
(80), r is the droplet radius (m), φ is the surface (zeta) long-term emulsion stability for cosmetic O/W emulsions
potential ( 0.05 V, measured), h is the distance between was elucidated experimentally and analytically. High shear
droplets (m), κ1 is the Debye length (5 × 1010 m, from mixing rate in emulsification accelerated coalescence of
the Guoy-Chapman theory), kB is the Boltzmann constant tiny droplets through Brownian flocculation, resulting in
(1.38 × 1023 J·K1), T is the temperature (K), and A12 is the reduction of long-term emulsion stability. The optimal
the Hamaker constant (1020 J). Figure 8 shows the depen- shear rate of 4000 rpm endowed cosmetic O/W emulsions
dence of total potential energy on droplet size and emul- with fine and stable droplets, and thus increased the vis-
sification temperature of cosmetic O/W emulsions. As a cosity of the medium, which helped sustain the long-term
droplet size of emulsions decreased, the energy barrier stability of dispersed droplets. In addition, optimal shear
resisting the droplet coalescence decreased, indicating the mixing time of 3 min in emulsifying process diminished
reduction of emulsion stability, as shown in Fig. 8a. This the instability of cosmetic emulsions through formation of
is in accord with the experimental results on shear mixing fine and uniform droplets, and thereby improved the kinetic
emulsion stability. Theoretical analysis on the parameters
governing the emulsion stability in shear-driven cosmetic
emulsification revealed that the shear mixing rate is the
most critical factor in creating long-term stable cosmetic
emulsions. These results will help improve the emulsion
stability of common cosmetics through controlled shear
mixing process.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Cosmax Co., Ltd., and by


the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant
funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-
2018R1A5A1024127).

References

Bilati, U., E. Allémann, and E. Doelker, 2003, Sonication param-


eters for the preparation of biodegradable nanocapsulesof con-
trolled size by the double emulsion method, Pharm. Dev.
Technol. 8, 1-9.
Boström, M., V. Deniz, G.V. Franks, and B.W. Ninham, 2006,
Extended DLVO theory: Electrostatic and non-electrostatic
Fig. 8. (Color online) DLVO simulation results for (a) droplet forces in oxide suspensions, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 123, 5-
size and (b) temperature. 15.

248 Korea-Australia Rheology J., 32(4), 2020


Controlling the emulsion stability of cosmetics through shear mixing process

Chanamai, R. and D.J. McClements, 2000, Creaming stability of Nii, S., S. Kikumoto, and H. Tokuyama, 2009, Quantitative
flocculated monodisperse oil-in-water emulsions, J. Colloid approach to ultrasonic emulsion separation, Ultrason. Sonochem.
Interface Sci. 225, 214-218. 16, 145-149.
Dukhin, S.S., J. Sjöblom, D.T. Wasan, and Ø. Sæther, 2001, Ontiveros, J.F., C. Pierlot, M. Catté, V. Molinier, J.L. Salager, and
Coalescence coupled with either coagulation or flocculation in J.M. Aubry, 2014, A simple method to assess the hydrophilic
dilute emulsions, Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 180, lipophilic balance of food and cosmetic surfactants using the
223-234. phase inversion temperature of C10E4/n-octane/water emul-
Dyab, A.K.F., 2012, Destabilisation of Pickering emulsions using sions, Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 458, 32-39.
pH, Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 402, 2-12. Ozturk, B. and D.J. McClements, 2016, Progress in natural emul-
Gilbert, L., C. Picard, G. Savary, and M. Grisel, 2013, Rheolog- sifiers for utilization in food emulsions, Curr. Opin. Food
ical and textural characterization of cosmetic emulsions con- Sci.7, 1-6.
taining natural and synthetic polymers: Relationships between Pal, R., 1993, Rheological behaviour of surfactant-flocculated
both data, Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 421, 150- water-in-oil emulsions, Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng.
163. Asp. 71, 173-185.
Glampedaki, P. and V. Dutschk, 2014, Stability studies of cos- Pal, R., 1996, Effect of droplet size on the rheology of emulsions,
metic emulsions prepared from natural products such as wine, AICHE J. 42, 3181-3190.
grape seed oil and mastic resin, Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Pal, R., 2000, Shear viscosity behavior of emulsions of two
Eng. Asp. 460, 306-311. immiscible liquids, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 225, 359-366.
Goodarzi, F. and S. Zendehboudi, 2019, A comprehensive review Princen, H.M., 1985, Rheology of foams and highly concentrated
on emulsions and emulsion stability in chemical and energy emulsions. II. Experimental study of the yield stress and wall
industries, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 97, 281-309. effects for concentrated oil-in-water emulsions, J. Colloid
Gullapalli, R.P. and B.B. Sheth, 1999, Influence of an optimized Interface Sci. 105, 150-171.
non-ionic emulsifier blend on properties of oil-in-water emul- Rayner, M., D. Marku, M. Eriksson, M. Sjöö, P. Dejmek, and M.
sions, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 48, 233-238. Wahlgren, 2014, Biomass-based particles for the formulation
Kaganyuk, M. and A. Mohraz, 2019, Impact of particle size on of Pickering type emulsions in food and topical applications,
droplet coalescence in solid-stabilized high internal phase Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 458, 48-62.
emulsions, Langmuir 35, 12807-12816. Shields, M., R. Ellis, and B.R. Saunders, 2001, A creaming study
Kong, L., J.K. Beattie, and R.J. Hunter, 2003, Electroacoustic of weakly flocculated and depletion flocculated oil-in-water
study of BSA or lecithin stabilised soybean oil-in-water emul- emulsions, Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 178, 265-
sions and SDS effect, Colloid Surf. B-Biointerfaces 27, 11-21. 276.
Kumar, S., G. Narsimhan, and D. Ramkrishna, 1996, Coalescence Tadros, T.F., 1994, Fundamental principles of emulsion rheology
in creaming emulsions. Existence of a pure coalescence zone, and their applications, Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp.
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35, 3155-3162. 91, 39-55.
Liu, C., F. An, H. He, D. He, Y. Wang, and H. Song, 2018, Pick- Tal-Figiel, B., 2007, The formation of stable w/o, o/w, w/o/w cos-
ering emulsions stabilized by compound modified areca taro metic emulsions in an ultrasonic field, Chem. Eng. Res. Des.
(Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) starch with ball-milling and 85, 730-734.
OSA, Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 556, 185-194. Tcholakova, S., N.D. Denkov, I.B. Ivanov, and B. Campbell,
Lupi, F.R., L. Gentile, D. Gabriele, S. Mazzulla, N. Baldino, and 2006, Coalescence stability of emulsions containing globular
B. De Cindio, 2015, Olive oil and hyperthermal water bigels milk proteins, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 123, 259-293.
for cosmetic uses, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 459, 70-78. Toro-Mendoza, J. and D.N. Petsev, 2010, Brownian dynamics of
Mason, T.G., J.N. Wilking, K. Meleson, C.B. Chang, and S.M. emulsion film formation and droplet coalescence, Phys. Rev. E
Graves, 2006, Nanoemulsions: Formation, structure, and phys- 81, 051404.
ical properties, J. Phys.-Condes. Matter 18, 635-666. Urbina-Villalba, G., 2009, An algorithm for emulsion stability
Mine, Y., M. Shimizu, and T. Nakashima, 1996, Preparation and simulations: Account of flocculation, coalescence, surfactant
stabilization of simple and multiple emulsions using a micro- adsorption and the process of Ostwald ripening, Int. J. Mol.
porous glass membrane, Colloid Surf. B-Biointerfaces 6, 261- Sci. 10, 761-804.
268.

Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Korea-Australia Rheology J., 32(4), 2020 249

You might also like