Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Preface xv
P
PART ONE
Writing Critically and Conducting Research 1
vi
Contents vii
P
PART TWO
Issues Across the Disciplines 179
Asks the question: Are the media and politicians right to blame
video games when white middle-class teens kill?
Hip-Hop’s Betrayal of Black Women Jennifer McLune 192
Argues against the socioeconomic defense of misogynistic
lyrics in hip-hop music.
Scientists Aren’t the Only Innovators: We Really Need Artists
Sarah Lewis 197
Argues the importance of the arts in fostering creativity
and innovation.
A Glaring Diversity Gap in Films: Top U.S. Fictional
Movies Overwhelmingly Male and White, Study
Finds Manohla Dargis
Reports on research that looks at gender, race, and ethnicity
in the most popular films in the United States.
Through a Screen Darkly: Popular Culture, Public Diplomacy,
and America’s Image Abroad Kenneth D. M Jensen
Reviews Martha Bayle’s book on America’s image abroad
and suggests ways that American diplomats can deal with
the negative image of America’s pop culture.
Perspectives on Popular Culture and the Arts 201
Responding to Visuals 204
Glossary 380
Credits 386
Index 388
xv
PREFACE
xv
xvi Preface
issues/ideas presented by the readings in that chapter. Eighteen articles are available
online through the Questia website and include additional questions for discussion.
New Readings. There are eighteen new readings in print in this edition, all of them
published recently. Together with the Questia articles, thirty-six of the fifty titles in
the book are new. These new readings cover topics of contemporary interest, and their
writers sometimes take controversial positions on the issues under discussion.
Sleeker, Slimmer Text. This book has fewer pages than previous editions,
making it more manageable to cover in a one-semester class. Parts Two to Five in
previous editions are now clustered together, with individual chapter titles noting
the subject of each chapter.
MLA Updates. This edition has been updated to reflect guidelines from the 2016
MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, Eighth Edition.
READING SELECTIONS
The book has two parts, and the reading selections are organized by broad
disciplinary areas:
• Chapters 8 and 9 cover the broad areas of popular culture, the arts, and
media studies. Readings cover such subjects as music and video games, media
violence, advertising, Hollywood films, television, and the visual arts.
• Chapters 10 to 14 address such matters as education, poverty and
homelessness, gender and sex roles, race and ethnicity, and psychology and
human behavior.
• Chapter 15 focuses on bioethical and environmental issues, with writers
giving opinions on the sale of organs, environmental issues, and the crisis of
rapid species extinction.
• Chapter 16 addresses marketing, the American consumer, and the workplace,
with readings on the spread of commercialization, the difficulties employers
face in finding workers, and the problems of a worker has when seeking a job.
The selections in each chapter encourage students to consider issues from
different perspectives because their authors come from a wide range of disciplinary
backgrounds and training. Sometimes the writers cross disciplinary lines in
their essays. The individual perspectives of the writers may differ markedly from
students’ own perspectives, thus generating discussion and writing topics.
A DEFINITION OF ISSUES
Given the title of this textbook, a definition of issues is in order. An issue is usually
taken to mean a topic that is controversial, that prompts differences of opinion, or
that can be seen from different perspectives. It often raises questions or requires
taking a close look at a problem. Although this is not primarily an argument
textbook, the inclusion of topics and essays guaranteed to spark controversy is
deliberate. Many of the readings will prompt students to take opposing positions.
Some of the readings are provocative; others may anger students. Such differences
of opinion generate lively class discussions and result in writing opportunities that
engage students.
ONLINE RESOURCES
MindTap® English for Ackley’s Perspectives on Contemporary Issues: Reading
Across the Disciplines, Eighth Edition, engages students to help them become
better thinkers, communicators, and writers by blending course materials with
content that supports every aspect of the writing process. Interactive activities
on grammar and mechanics promote application in student writing, and an
easy-to-use paper management system allows for electronic submission, grading,
and peer review while tracking potential plagiarism. A vast database of scholarly
sources with video tutorials and examples supports each step of the research
process, and professional tutoring guides students from rough drafts to polished
writing. Visual analytics track student progress and engagement with seamless
integration into campus learning management system that keeps all course
materials in one place.
xviii Preface
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank the following reviewers for their helpful suggestions on this
new edition: Gretchen DiGeronimo, Becker College; David Green, Mass Bay
Community College; Lilia Joy, Henderson Community College; Nancy Lee-Jones,
Endicott College and Catherine Pavlich, Oregon Coast Community College. As
always, I thank my husband, Rich, and my family: Heather, Brian, Elizabeth, and
Lucas Schilling; Laurel, Gianni, Zack, and Celia Yahi; Jeremy, Jenni, and Che
White; Robin Ackley-Fay and Terry Fay; and Jon Ackley.
A special thank you to Professor Beate C. Gilliar, Professor of English at
Manchester University, North Manchester, Indiana, and the following students in
her expository and critical writing course: Samantha Baker, Megan Batten, Shelby
Covington, Stephanie Griffith, Brandon Hite, Catherine Lange, David Lloyd,
Amy Luthanen, Holly Pawlak, Rebecca Pendergrass, Alison Scholtfeldt, Kristen
Wolf, Maria Villafuerta, and Carol Yañez.
I am especially thankful for the gracious willingness of these students to share
their written work for use in this textbook: Rita Fleming, Nate Hayes, Shawn
Ryan, Elizabeth Schilling, Clorinda Tharp, Michael Vawter, and Laurel Yahi.
Finally, I give a special thank you to my editor, Kathy Sands-Boehmer, who
has once again been a joy to work with.
PART 1
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Students will demonstrate an ability to do the following:
☐ Read with a critical eye and participate in the class discussion of
college-level essays, visual images, advertisements, and websites.
☐ Demonstrate an understanding of the principles of rhetorical analysis
by handing in a written evaluation of a reading, visual image,
advertisement, or website.
2
Rhetorical Analysis of a Written Work 3
obviously, you must understand what you read before you can examine it. Once you
develop a clear understanding of a piece of writing, you have a solid basis for moving
beyond comprehension to evaluation.
The process of reading critically involves examining an author’s ideas and the
evidence the author has supplied in support of those ideas. It means that you try to
recognize the difference between reasonable, logical assertions and those that are
unreasonable or lack credibility. It requires you to distinguish between fact and opin-
ion; to sort out the evidence an author cites; and to evaluate that evidence in terms
of its relevance, accuracy, and importance. Thus, reading critically means that you
actively engage in what you read, you analyze it, and you evaluate it. Learning to be
a critical reader also helps make you a better writer. The best writers are often those
who read widely. If you pay attention to not only what the authors you are reading
have to say but also to the ways in which they use language, structure their essays,
and develop their ideas, you will learn some valuable lessons for your own writing.
The following questions to ask about a written work are useful for getting the
most from your reading. They provide guidelines for reading that will also be helpful
for any kind of writing required in your college courses, especially the one for which
you are using this textbook. If you read the assigned selections carefully, you will very
likely be fully prepared to write on one of the topics that end each chapter. Certainly,
reading critically is a necessity for any of the varieties of writing and strategies dis-
cussed in Part One: summary, critique, argument, synthesis, and the research paper.
What Do You Know about the Author? If information about the author is pro-
vided, read it. Knowing who the author is, what his or her profession is, and what his
4 CHAPTER 1 Reading Critically
or her publications are, for example, gives you an idea of the authority from which
the author writes. In magazines, journals, and collections of essays, such as those you
will use in many of your college courses, the headnote often tells you about the au-
thor. The headnote is the information located between the title and the beginning of
the essay, usually highlighted or set off from the body of the essay itself. The title of
the Clay Shirkey article mentioned above becomes all the more intriguing when you
learn in the headnote that he is a professor of media studies, which seems at odds
with his decision to not allow students to use their laptops in class. Another example
is the headnote for Karen Sternheimer’s “Do Video Games Kill?” (Chapter 8):
Karen Sternheimer, whose work focuses on youth and popular culture, teaches in the
sociology department at the University of Southern California, where she is also a
distinguished fellow at the USC Center for Excellence in Teaching. She is author of
Pop Culture Panics: How Moral Crusaders Construct Meanings of Deviance
and Delinquency (2015); Celebrity Culture and the American Dream: Stardom
and Social Mobility (2011); It’s Not the Media: The Truth about Pop Culture’s
Influence on Children (2003); Kids These Days: Facts and Fictions about Today’s
Youth (2006
( ); and Connecting Popular Culture and Social Problems: Why the
Media Is Not the Answer (2009). Her commentary has been published in several
newspapers, and she has appeared on numerous television and radio programs. This article
appeared in Contexts, a quarterly publication of the American Sociological Association.
What Is the Purpose? Good writers have clear purposes in mind as they plan
and draft their work. Most nonfiction writing falls into the categories of persua-
sive, expository, and expressive writing. These forms of writing are used to achieve
different goals, and they adopt different strategies for achieving those goals. In per-
suasive writing, the emphasis is on the reader: the writer’s purpose is to convince
the reader of the validity of his or her position on an issue and sometimes even to
move the reader to action. In expository writing, the goal is to inform or present
an objective explanation. The emphasis is on ideas, events, or objects themselves,
not on how the writer feels about them. Much of the writing in college textbooks is
expository, as are newspaper, magazine, and professional journal articles, and nonfic-
tion books. Expository writing can take many forms, including cause–effect analysis,
comparison–contrast, definition, and classification. Expressive writing emphasizes
Rhetorical Analysis of a Written Work 5
the writer’s feelings and subjective view of the world. The writer’s focus is on personal
feelings about, or attitude toward, the subject. A journal or diary includes expressive
writing. Persuasive, expository, and expressive writing often overlap, but usually a
writer has one main purpose. From the opening paragraphs of a written work, you
should be able to determine its general purpose or aim. A clearly implied or stated
purpose helps the writer shape the writing, and it helps the reader understand and
evaluate the work.
Who Is the Intended Audience? Writers make assumptions about the peo-
ple they are writing for, including whether their audience will be sympathetic or
opposed to their positions, how informed their readers are about the subjects they
are writing on, what their education level is, and similar considerations. These as-
sumptions that writers make about their readers directly influence the tone they
use; the evidence they select; the way in which they organize and develop their
writing; and even their sentence structure, word choice, and diction level. Knowing
whom the writer is addressing helps you understand the writer’s point of view and
explain the choices the writer has made in writing the piece. In writing for col-
lege courses, students usually assume a general audience of people like themselves
who are reasonably intelligent and interested in what they have to say. However,
professional writers or scholars often write for specific audiences, depending on
the publications in which their writing appears. Knowing whether an audience is
familiar with a subject or whether the audience is specialized or general also gov-
erns what kinds of evidence to offer and how much to include. Where the writing
is published gives you a good idea of who the audience is. Take, for instance, Karen
Sternheimer’s “Do Video Games Kill?” (Chapter 8), mentioned earlier. Her piece
appeared in a publication of the professional society associated with her area of
expertise, sociology. However, Contexts is not a professional journal but rather, ac-
cording to the website of the American Sociological Association (www.asanet.org),
“a quarterly magazine that makes cutting-edge social research accessible to general
readers. We’re the public face of sociology.” Knowing this, you can expect the article
to be written in accessible language, addressed to an audience familiar with social
issues who will need to be presented with convincing or persuasive evidence in
support of her thesis.
What Is the Thesis or Main Idea? The thesis states the main idea of the en-
tire essay. Sometimes it is embodied in a single sentence—the thesis statement—
and sometimes it is expressed in several sentences. If the main idea is not explicitly
stated, it should be clearly implied. Whether the thesis is explicit or implicit, it is
a necessary component of a clearly written work. A thesis helps the writer focus
the writing and guides the organization and development of key ideas. It also helps
to provide direction to the reader by making clear what the point of the essay is,
thereby assisting the reader’s understanding of the piece.
What Are the Key Ideas and Supporting Evidence or Details? For this step
in your critical reading, you should underline or highlight the major points of the
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Chants for the
Boer
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United
States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away
or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License
included with this ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you
are not located in the United States, you will have to check the
laws of the country where you are located before using this
eBook.
Language: English
San Francisco
The Whitaker & Ray Company
(Incorporated)
1900
Copyright, 1900
by
The Whitaker & Ray Company
(Incorporated)
CONTENTS.
TO THE BOERS.
TO YE FIGHTING LORDS OF LONDON TOWN.
MOTHER EGYPT.
ANGLO-SAXON ALLIANCE.
INDIA AND THE BOERS.
AT THE CALEND’S CLOSE.
AS IT IS WRITTEN.
TO OOM PAUL KRUGER.
USLAND TO THE BOERS.
THAT USSIAN OF USLAND.
FIGHT A BOY OF YOUR SIZE.
For the right that needs assistance,
For the wrong that needs resistance,
For the glory in the distance,
For the good that we can do.
Find here not one ill word for brave old England; my first, best friends
were English. But for her policy, her politicians, her speculators, what
man with a heart in him can but hate and abhor them? England’s
best friends to-day are those who deplore this assault on the farmer
Boers, so like ourselves a century back. Could any man be found
strong enough to stay her hand with sword or pen in this mad hour?
That man would deserve her lasting gratitude. This feeling of
abhorrence holds in England as well as here. Take for example the
following from her ablest thinker to a friend in Philadelphia:
“I rejoice that you and others are bent on showing that
there are some among us who think the national honor is
not being enhanced by putting down the weak. Would that
age and ill health did not prevent me from aiding.
“No one can deny that at the time of the Jameson Raid the
aim of the Outlanders and the raiders was to usurp the
Transvaal Government, and he must be willfully blind who
does not see what the Outlanders failed to do by bullets
they hope presently to do by votes, and only those who,
while jealous of their own independence, regard but little
the independence of people who stand in their way, can
fail to sympathize with the Boers in their resistance to
political extinction.
“It is sad to see our Government backing those whose
avowed policy is expansion, which, less politely
expressed, means aggression, for which there is a still
less polite word readily guessed. On behalf of these, the
big British Empire, weapon in hand, growls out to the little
Boer Republic, ‘Do as I bid you.’
“I have always thought that nobleness is shown in treating
tenderly those who are relatively feeble and even
sacrificing on their behalf something to which there is a
just claim. But, if current opinion is right, I must have been
wrong.”
Herbert Spencer.
CHANTS
FOR THE BOER
BY
JOAQUIN MILLER
TO THE BOERS.
“For Freedom’s battles once begun,
Bequeathed from bleeding sire to son,
Though baffled oft, are ever won.”
—BYRON.