Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Note 12 Level 2
32 TheStructuralEngineer Technical
June 2014 Technical Guidance Note
Introduction to
steel portal frames
Introduction
Portal frames are a simple and very addressed in more detail in Technical ICON W Design principles
common type of framed (or skeleton) Guidance Note No. 10 (Level 1) LEGEND
structure. Steel portal frames, in Principles of lateral stability. Thus,
W Applied practice
particular, are a cost-effective in spite of the inherent simplicity of
structural system to support building portal frames, many aspects of their
envelopes (such as warehouses and analysis, design and detailing require W Further reading
shopping complexes) requiring large careful consideration.
column-free spaces. In general, the Portal frames can be made from W Web resources
loads and consequent deformations concrete, timber and even glass but
for these frames are in the plane of the vast majority, in the UK certainly,
the structure, and hence these are a are constructed from steel. This
2D (or plane) frame structure. Due to Technical Guidance Note gives an
the practical requirement of having introduction to steel portal frames
a clear space between the supports and their preliminary analysis. Steel
of a portal frame, providing in-plane portal frames usually have pinned
bracing is generally not feasible. bases and moment connections at the
Consequently, these frames undergo column/rafter interface and mid-span Span Steel Portal Frame Buildings to
larger deflections and are prone to apex splice in the rafter. Although Eurocode 3), for the sake of brevity
sway laterally, even under the vertical there are other forms of portal frame and clarity this note will be dedicated
loads. The concept of sway frames is (described in Elastic Design of Single- to this particular form.
c) Rafters
d) Rafter to column d) Rafter to column
connection/eave joint connection/eave joint
Design principles
33
Rafter
Roof
purlins
Rafter
Cladding
Column
rails
Haunch Haunch
stiffener stiffener
Column
Figure 2
Typical detail of eave joint haunch
N Figure 3
Cladding rails to steel portal frame
acting as buckling restraints to outer flange
Connection stiffening
With connections needing to carry a
significant bending moment, it is often
Figure 4
Fly bracing restraint to inner
flanges of steel portal frame elements
necessary to provide some form of
stiffening to the elements. This typically
takes the form of haunches, which are either of the structure owing to the presence of The rails only provide direct restraint to the
a cut section from the elements they are large door openings in the wall cladding. outer compression flanges of the rafter/
stiffening or fabricated plates. The required In such instances the unrestrained span column. With the ever-present risk of
size and extent is dependent on the applied of the column is taken from its base to bending moment reversal due to negative
bending on the portal frame, but in practice the connection with the rafter. Thus, the wind pressure, there is a requirement
haunches typically take up 10% of the columns are vulnerable to both lateral to provide restraint to the inner flange
portal span of the rafter element, which will torsional and Euler buckling. Figure 3 is (especially to the rafters). This restraint,
optimise the efficiency of the unstiffened a section showing the typical layout of commonly known as ‘fly bracing’ comes
length of the rafter (Figure 2). cladding rails in a portal frame structure. in the form of two flat plate strips that are
fixed at 45º from the cladding rail to the
Buckling restraints inner flange of the primary steel element
Steel portal frames made from open
sections are vulnerable to lateral torsional
"the highest bending (Figure 4).
34 TheStructuralEngineer Technical
June 2014 Technical Guidance Note
the column is 1.5 times that of the second moment of area of the
rafter element (Fig. 3). Another reasonable assumption is that the
highest bending moments in a portal frame are generated from
applied vertical actions, such as self-weight, wind and snow. During
preliminary design it is generally acceptable to account for second
order effects by increasing the applied bending moment by 15%.
Elastic Design of Single-Span Steel Portal Frame Buildings to
Eurocode 3 provides design formulae for steel portal frames. It
advises that to determine approximate bending stresses in a steel
portal frame, the following formulae can be used:
ME is the bending moment in the eve joints of the steel portal frame
MA is the bending moment at the apex joint of the rafter
N = B+mC, where C is 1+2m, B is 2(k+1)+m, m is 1+ϕ, ϕ is f/h
I h
and k = I R $ s
C
Types of analysis
There are two methods of analysing steel portal frames: elastic and
plastic. The elastic method assumes that the structure does not under the loading in reality.
undergo permanent inelastic deformations when placed under load. No more than three plastic hinges with
When subjected to normal gravity loading, the resulting bending pinned baseplates (or four with fixed
moment profile has a hogging bending moment at the eave joint of baseplates) are formed. Otherwise the
the frame and a sagging moment in the rafter apex joint. Subject structure becomes an over-complete
to certain conditions, it is permissible to re-distribute up to 15% of mechanism, as a portal frame has a single
the maximum bending moment within the portal frame when using degree of indeterminacy when it has pinned
elastic analysis according to BS EN 1993-1-1 Clause 5.4.1 (4) B. baseplates. However, the location of the
Figure 6 is the bending moment diagram developed from elastic middle hinge near the apex of the rafter
analysis under symmetric gravity loads. cannot be pre-determined. Therefore, it is
Formation of three plastic hinges converts a steel portal frame assumed that one will form either side of
with pinned supports into a mechanism. The most likely locations the apex for the purposes of analysis. It is
for the plastic hinges to form are close to the eave and apex joints, for this reason that four plastic hinges are
as they involve the highest hogging or sagging moments. However, shown in Fig. 7, with the two closest to the
if the geometry and loading are symmetric for a portal frame, it is apex being possible locations for a plastic
difficult to predict whether the plastic hinge near the apex joint will hinge. More information on this subject can
form either on its left or right side. Therefore, two plastic hinges are be found in the J.M. Davies paper False
shown near the apex joint in Figure 7, of which only one will form mechanisms in elastic-plastic analysis.
35
F
effects while designing steel structures. For elastic analysis: a cr = F cr $ 10
Ed
Clause 5.2 of BS EN 1993-1-1 describes the
parameters which can be used to determine
F
the significance of the second order effects For plastic analysis: a cr = F cr $ 15
Ed
in the analysis of steel structures. The factor
acr is the ratio between the elastic critical
buckling load Fcr of the structure for global Nominal stiffness of base
instability and the applied design load FEd. Steel portal frames are typically modelled
Second order effects are deemed not to be as having pinned supports at the column
significant when a satisfies the following: base, but in reality the base has a nominal
cr
Figure 7
Bending moment diagram of portal
frame using plastic analysis
stiffness, acting more like semi-rigid
supports than pure pin supports. In the UK,
bases are typically formed of an unstiffened
baseplate that has four holding down
anchors fixed into the foundations
(Figure 9).
It is reasonable and conservative to
consider these semi-rigid supports as
pinned supports at the ultimate limit state
condition. However, this assumption does
not remain valid at the serviceability limit
state condition. Nominally pinned base
connections do provide some additional
resistance to lateral deflection. By taking
into account this additional stiffness, it is
possible to reduce the second order effects
due to deformation of the portal frame as it
deflects under load. It is generally accepted
that 10-15% of the applied moment can be
taken (Fig. 9).
36 TheStructuralEngineer Technical
June 2014 Technical Guidance Note
Fibre reinforced sheeting # b/100 # (b 2 + s 2) 0.5 /165 Stanchion – alternative term attributed to the columns of the portal
frame.
Where b is spacing between steel portal frames and s is the length of rafter (Fig. 5).
* All deflection limits are provided as guidance only and are dependent on other factors Further Reading
not described in this table. The Steel Construction Institute (2012) Elastic Design of Single-Span
Steel Portal Frame Buildings to Eurocode 3 (P397), Ascot, Berkshire:
SCI
to establish a reasonable deflection that
can be safely permitted depending upon The Institution of Structural Engineers (2010) Manual for the
its support conditions. Such limits must be design of steelwork building structures to Eurocode 3, London: The
agreed with the rest of the design team and Institution of Structural Engineers
the client.
As with most serviceability limits, only The Institution of Structural Engineers (2012) Technical Guidance
the unfactored imposed load/characteristic Note 10 (Level 1), The Structural Engineer, 90 (7), pp. 28-31
variable action is considered while
calculating the deflections of a steel portal The Institution of Structural Engineers (2013) Technical Guidance
frame. Note 1 (Level 2), The Structural Engineer, 91 (1), pp. 25-29
The lateral deflection limits are largely
dependent on the cladding materials that The Institution of Structural Engineers (2013) Technical Guidance
make up the walls of the structure. This can Note 2 (Level 2), The Structural Engineer, 91 (2), pp. 40-43
vary from metal sheeting to precast concrete
units. Table 1 is drawn from limits given in The Institution of Structural Engineers (1988) 'False mechanisms in
Elastic Design of Single-Span Steel Portal elastic-plastic analysis', The Structural Engineer, 66 (16), p.268
Frame Buildings to Eurocode 3. It offers
guidance on what limits may be adopted
for the lateral deflection for different types Eurocode 0.
of wall cladding material. It should be noted Web resources
that these are considered to be conservative
in most instances and some engineering The Steel Construction Institute: www.steel-sci.org/
judgement is required before applying them.
For vertical deflections of the rafters, Steel Portal Frames Wiki: www.steelconstruction.info/Portal_frames
Table 2 provides guidance on deflection
limits based on a roof slope that is at least 3º The Institution of Structural Engineers library:
with the horizontal. www.istructe.org/resources-centre/library