The document provides an overview of debate concepts and structures for a small seminar debate. It discusses weighing arguments, looking at the magnitude, scope, probability, timeframe, and reversibility of impacts, as well as moral requirements and voluntary risk. It also mentions institutional obligations. Additionally, it provides examples of debate topics from a recent tournament and defines some of the terms, such as "no child left behind" and digital nomadism.
The document provides an overview of debate concepts and structures for a small seminar debate. It discusses weighing arguments, looking at the magnitude, scope, probability, timeframe, and reversibility of impacts, as well as moral requirements and voluntary risk. It also mentions institutional obligations. Additionally, it provides examples of debate topics from a recent tournament and defines some of the terms, such as "no child left behind" and digital nomadism.
The document provides an overview of debate concepts and structures for a small seminar debate. It discusses weighing arguments, looking at the magnitude, scope, probability, timeframe, and reversibility of impacts, as well as moral requirements and voluntary risk. It also mentions institutional obligations. Additionally, it provides examples of debate topics from a recent tournament and defines some of the terms, such as "no child left behind" and digital nomadism.
Small Seminar Bench Constructive Clash Roadmap Vertical Extension Horizontal Extension Framework Weighing Mechanisms Derivative (argument) Small Seminar - 2
Weighing Comparing arguments against each other
We're doing the job of a judge
Magnitude How severe is the impact
Scope How broadly is the impact felt across a
population or the world
Probability How likely is the event to happen?
Timeframe Is it a short term or a long term harm?
Reversibility Can it be done or undone?
Moral Requirement = affirming or negating creates an ethical obligation to act
whether an advantage or a disadvantage
actively or indirectly occurs – do you Voluntary Risk tacitly consent to a harm happening or do you actually commit the harm (worse to actively harm than passively harm) Institutional obligations
= some impacts are the responsibilities of a given institution – even if I
commit some harms/violate some rights whatever, it’s still more important to affirm the resolution because I’m at least keeping w/ the obligations of the institution in question In the News... The Public Service Alliance of Canada is one of Canada's largest national labour unions and the largest union in the Canadian federal public sector. PSAC members work in every province and territory, and also work abroad in embassies and consulates. Some Debate topics from the tournament Round 1 THBT children's media should have clearly defined good and evil characters Round 2 THO "no child left behind" What is "no child left behind"? Round 3 THR the rise of digital nomadism Regret motions Not about what is good or bad about it
SHOULD IT EXIST AT ALL
Preparing for Regrets Motions (saskdebate.ca)
https://saskdebate.ca/Portals/0/Preparing%20for%20Regrets%20Motions.pdf What is digital nomadism? Round 4 THW implement mandatory national environmental service for all 18 year olds Round 5 THBT social justice movements should prioritize local issues over national issues Grand Final THP a world where people are born as fully- developed adults Today's Debate: THBT there is no such thing as a good lie.