Name of the Presenter: Group 2

Evaluator/s: Group 1

Leader:
Candelaria, Klyde
Members:
Belia, Claudine
Gomez, Kassandra Marie
Peligro, Clarisse
Maghanoy, Shandy
Ochea, Hanah Shane Marie
Villa, Shalom
Amamangpang, Tricia
Rica, Kathleen Marie

Topic: Concepts, Theories, and Hypotheses about Language and Culture

Date of presentation: Oct 7, 2023 (1st half)

Oct 9, 2023 (2nd half)

RUBRIC FOR GRADING THE ORAL PRESENTATION

Qualities Excellent Very Good Fair Remark

40-35 Good 29-25 25-20
34-30

Criteria 1: Content (40 points) 39

The content perfectly
The presentation correlates with the
● is accurate with sufficient information discussion. Each sub-topic
within the discussion shows
● follows a clear and logical structure multiple instances of
examples, where that sub-
● is directly related to the subject and topic is being applied. The
addresses key concepts reporters follow a logical
● uses relevant and enough examples to structure that makes it easier
to understand the entire
enhance understanding
lesson, also including key
concepts to make sure the
listeners will understand.

Criteria 2: Delivery (30 points) 28

The presenters within group
The group presenter 2 spoke in a clear and
coherent enough manner,
● speaks clearly and coherently to though may require some
convey the information effectively improvements within the
group members. Each
● demonstrates enthusiasm, which member seems to have a
captivates the audience and holds small amount of enthusiasm
their attention which the audience may or
● incorporates activities that facilitates may find appealing.
The group also incorporated
learning
activities
● stays within the given time limit The incorporation of
engaging activities facilitated
a dynamic learning
environment, enhancing the
overall educational
experience. While they
slightly exceeded the time
limit, the depth of their
discussion justified the
 extension, and overall, their
performance was
praiseworthy.

Criteria 3: Visuals and Design (20 points) 18

The presentation material/s

● such as slides or handouts, are The slides in the presentation

visually clear and legible are clear and eligible, the
amount of text within the
● incorporates visually appealing presentation is adequate per
elements, such as relevant images, slide. The slides are simple
charts, or graphs, and demonstrates yet enough to be eye
creativity in design catching

Criteria 4: Q&A and Interaction (10 7

points) The presenters answered the
questions in a manner that is
The group presenter logical and provided an
example. They also provided
● addresses the questions and a real-life type example that
demonstrates a deep understanding of can be seen or potentially
the topic even experienced by the
viewers or learners. The
● responds confidently and promptly to reporters definitely
questions encouraged participation
● encourages audience participation, within the reporting and
demanded to not shy away
actively listens to questions and
from asking a question.
comments, and fosters a collaborative
and interactive atmosphere

Overall Score
Prepared by: Dr. Jollibee Angchangco-Aharul