The document provides a rubric to evaluate creativity, originality, relevance, aesthetic appeal, simplicity, memorability, and technical execution of a design project. It rates these criteria on a scale from exceptional to unsatisfactory. An exceptional design is highly creative, clearly relevant to the creator, visually appealing with a harmonious composition, simple yet memorable, and has precise technical execution. A satisfactory design has standard creativity, moderate relevance, adequate aesthetic appeal and simplicity, but could be improved in some areas. An unsatisfactory design lacks creativity, fails to be relevant, and has poor technical execution.
The document provides a rubric to evaluate creativity, originality, relevance, aesthetic appeal, simplicity, memorability, and technical execution of a design project. It rates these criteria on a scale from exceptional to unsatisfactory. An exceptional design is highly creative, clearly relevant to the creator, visually appealing with a harmonious composition, simple yet memorable, and has precise technical execution. A satisfactory design has standard creativity, moderate relevance, adequate aesthetic appeal and simplicity, but could be improved in some areas. An unsatisfactory design lacks creativity, fails to be relevant, and has poor technical execution.
The document provides a rubric to evaluate creativity, originality, relevance, aesthetic appeal, simplicity, memorability, and technical execution of a design project. It rates these criteria on a scale from exceptional to unsatisfactory. An exceptional design is highly creative, clearly relevant to the creator, visually appealing with a harmonious composition, simple yet memorable, and has precise technical execution. A satisfactory design has standard creativity, moderate relevance, adequate aesthetic appeal and simplicity, but could be improved in some areas. An unsatisfactory design lacks creativity, fails to be relevant, and has poor technical execution.
Exceptional (5 Above Average Satisfactory (3 Improvement (2 Unsatisfactory
Criteria points) (4 points) points) points) (1 point) Highly creative Creative design and unique, with original Standard capturing elements, creativity with Limited creativity, Lack of creativity, Creativity and essence aligning with the moderate relying on design lacks Originality effectively. brand. originality. generic elements. originality. Clearly Limited represents Relevant to self, Moderately relevance, personal but some relevant, with significant Fails to represent Relevance to identity and elements need room for adjustments personal identity Self values. refinement. improvement. needed. effectively. Visually Adequate Limited visual appealing, Generally aesthetic appeal appeal, Lacks aesthetic harmonious attractive, some with noticeable significant appeal, Aesthetic composition, elements may room for elements need significant design Appeal and style. need adjustment. improvement. refinement. flaws. Generally simple Moderately Somewhat Simple yet and memorable, simple and complex, Overly complex, memorable, minor memorable, impacting difficult to Simplicity and easy to recall adjustments opportunities for memorability and remember and Memorability and recognize. needed. streamlining. recognition. recognize. Precise and Adequate professional Generally well- technical Substantial Poor technical execution with executed, with execution, technical issues execution, Technical attention to minor technical noticeable areas impact overall significant design Execution detail. improvements. need refinement. quality. flaws.