Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Preface xix
Acknowledgments xxi
PART I Foundations
1 American Political Culture 2
What Americans Think about Government 5
Trust in Government 6
Political Efficacy 8
Citizenship: Knowledge and Participation 9
AMERICA SIDE BY SIDE Political Knowledge and Trust in Government 10
The Necessity of Political Knowledge 11
Digital Citizenship 12
Government 13
Is Government Needed? 13
Forms of Government 14
Limiting Government 15
Access to Government: The Expansion of Participation 16
Influencing the Government through Participation: Politics 16
Who Are Americans? 17
Immigration and Ethnic Diversity 18
WHO ARE AMERICANS? An Increasingly Diverse Nation 19
Immigration and Race 20
Twenty-First-Century Americans 21
American Political Culture 24
Liberty 26
Equality 27
Democracy 30
American Political Cultue and Your Future 31
vii
PLUG IN 33
Study Guide 34
For Further Reading 36
Recommended Websites 37
The Constitution 51
The Legislative Branch 52
The Executive Branch 54
The Judicial Branch 55
National Unity and Power 55
AMERICA SIDE BY SIDE Comparing Systems of Government 56
Amending the Constitution 57
Ratifying the Constitution 57
Constitutional Limits on the National Government’s Power 57
The Fight for Ratification 60
Federalists versus Antifederalists 60
Reflections on the Founding 63
The Citizen’s Role and the Changing Constitution 64
Amendments: Many Are Called; Few Are Chosen 64
Which Were Chosen? An Analysis of the Twenty-Seven 65
The Supreme Court and Constitutional Amendment 68
The Constitution and Your Future 69
PLUG IN 71
Study Guide 72
For Further Reading 74
Recommended Websites 75
viii CONTENTS
3 Federalism 76
Federalism in the Constitution 79
The Powers of the National Government 79
The Powers of State Government 81
States’ Obligations to One Another 81
Local Government and the Constitution 84
The Changing Relationship between the Federal Government
and the States 85
Restraining National Power with Dual Federalism 85
Federalism and the Slow Growth of the National Government’s
Power 88
The Changing Role of the States 90
Who Does What? Public Spending and the Expanding Federal Framework 92
The New Deal 92
Federal Grants 93
Cooperative Federalism 94
Regulated Federalism and National Standards 96
AMERICA SIDE BY SIDE Government Spending in Federal and Unitary Systems 98
CONTENTS ix
Rights of the Criminally Accused 137
The Fourth Amendment and Searches and Seizures 137
The Fifth Amendment 140
The Sixth Amendment and the Right to Counsel 142
The Eighth Amendment and Cruel and Unusual Punishment 143
x CONTENTS
Study Guide 202
For Further Reading 204
Recommended Websites 205
PART II Politics
6 Public Opinion 206
Defining Public Opinion 209
Political Values 210
Political Ideology 212
Trust in Government 216
How We Form Political Opinions 217
Political Socialization and Public Opinion 217
CONTENTS xi
7 The Media 256
Traditional Media 259
Print Media 259
Broadcast Media 262
Mass Media Ownership 264
xii CONTENTS
State Electoral Laws and Participation 327
Registration Requirements 327
Other Formal Barriers 330
Voting and Registration Reforms 330
AMERICA SIDE BY SIDE Voter Turnout in Comparison 331
CONTENTS xiii
Political Parties and Your Future 377
PLUG IN 379
Study Guide 380
For Further Reading 383
Recommended Websites 383
xiv CONTENTS
11 Groups and Interests 432
Defining Interest Groups 435
Common Types of Interest Groups 437
What Interests Are Not Represented? 439
AMERICA SIDE BY SIDE Interest Group Membership 440
CONTENTS xv
Conference Committee: Reconciling House and Senate Versions of
Legislation 496
Presidential Action 497
How Congress Decides 497
Constituency 498
Interest Groups 499
Party 500
When Congress Can’t Decide 504
AMERICA SIDE BY SIDE Public Opinion of the Legislature 505
xvi CONTENTS
14 Bureaucracy in a Democracy 558
Bureaucracy and Bureaucrats 561
What Bureaucrats Do 561
The Size of the Federal Service 564
The Organization of the Executive Branch 567
AMERICA SIDE BY SIDE Bureaucracy in Comparison 568
CONTENTS xvii
Explaining Supreme Court Decisions 628
Influences on Supreme Court Decision Making 628
Judicial Power and Politics 631
The Federal Judiciary and Your Future 634
PLUG IN 635
Study Guide 636
For Further Reading 639
Recommended Websites 639
Appendix
The Declaration of Independence A1
Glossary A33
Endnotes A43
Index A81
xviii CONTENTS
preface
T
his book has been and continues to be dedicated to developing a satisfactory
response to the question more and more Americans are asking: Why should
we be engaged with government and politics? Through the first nine edi-
tions, we sought to answer this question by making the text directly relevant
to the lives of the students who would be reading it. As a result, we tried to make
politics interesting by demonstrating that students’ interests are at stake and that
they therefore need to take a personal, even selfish, interest in the outcomes of
government. At the same time, we realized that students needed guidance in how
to become politically engaged. Beyond providing students with a core of political
knowledge, we needed to show them how they could apply that knowledge as
participants in the political process. The “Plug In” sections in each chapter help
achieve that goal.
As events from the last several years have reminded us, “what government does”
can be a matter of life and death. Recent events have reinforced the centrality of
government in citizens’ lives. The U.S. government has fought two wars abroad,
while claiming sweeping new powers at home that could compromise the liberties
of its citizens. America’s role in the world is discussed daily both inside and outside
the classroom. Moreover, the Internet has opened up new avenues to participation
and mobilization. Reflecting all of these trends, this new Tenth Edition shows more
than any other book on the market (1) how students are connected to government;
(2) how digital media are changing (or not changing) the way Americans experi-
ence politics; and (3) why students should think critically about government and
politics. These themes are incorporated in the following ways:
• New “Politics and Your Future” chapter conclusions give students direct,
personal reasons to care about politics. These sections focus on the
political opportunities and challenges that students will face in their lives
as a result of emerging social, political, demographic, and technological
change. The conclusions reprise the important point made in the chapter
introductions that government matters and prompt students to consider how
political change will impact their futures.
• New “Plug In” sections show students how to make a difference in politics.
These boxes replace the older “Get Involved” sections with succinct,
xix
realistic steps today’s students can take—online and off—to to inform
themselves, express themselves, connect with others, and act in politically
meaningful ways.
• New content on how digital media are changing politics is now incorporated
throughout the text. With the Ninth Edition, we added “Digital Citizens”
boxes to explore the ways that new information technologies are shaping
how we experience politics. In this Tenth Edition, the coverage of digital
politics has been integrated into the body of the text, in recognition of the
fact that digital media have become an integral part of American politics.
• New “America Side by Side” boxes use data figures and tables to provide
a comparative perspective. These one-page boxes appear in every chapter
and replace the older “America in the World” text boxes with a more visual
presentation of comparative data. By comparing political institutions and
behavior across countries, students gain a better understanding of how
specific features of the American system shape politics.
• “Who Are Americans?” infographics ask students to think critically about
how Americans from different backgrounds experience politics. These
sections use bold, engaging graphics to present a statistical snapshot of the
nation related to each chapter’s topic. Critical-thinking questions in each
unit and related exercises on the StudySpace website give students a
chance to compare their own views and experiences and consider the
political implications. The “Who Are Americans?” PowerPoint slides
include enhanced versions of the graphics for use in lectures.
• Chapter introductions focus on “What Government Does and Why It
Matters.” In recent decades, cynicism about “big government” has domi-
nated the political zeitgeist. But critics of government often forget that
governments do a great deal for citizens. Every year, Americans are the
beneficiaries of billions of dollars of goods and services from government
programs. Government “does” a lot, and what it does matters a great deal
to everyone, including college students. At the start of each chapter, this
theme is introduced and applied to the chapter’s topic. The goal is to show
students that government and politics mean something to their daily lives.
• “For Critical Analysis” questions are incorporated throughout the text. “For
Critical Analysis” questions in the margins of every chapter prompt students’
own critical thinking about the material in the chapter, encouraging them
to engage with the topic. And the questions that accompany each “Who
Are Americans?” unit ask students to consider how Americans from various
backgrounds experience politics.
We continue to hope that our book will itself be accepted as a form of enlight-
ened political action. This Tenth Edition is another chance. It is an advancement
toward our goal. We promise to keep trying.
xx P R E FA C E
acknowledgments
W
e are pleased to acknowledge the many colleagues who had an active role
in criticism and preparation of the manuscript. Our thanks go to:
AC K N OW L E D G M E N T S xxi
Larry Norris, South Plains College Seventh Edition Reviewers
David Rankin, State University of New York at Fredonia
Molly Andolina, DePaul University
Paul Roesler, St. Charles Community College
Nancy Bednar, Antelope Valley College
J. Philip Rogers, San Antonio College
Paul Blakelock, Kingwood College
Greg Shaw, Illinois Wesleyan University
Amy Brandon, San Jacinto College
Tracy Skopek, Stephen F. Austin State University
Jim Cauthen, John Jay College
Don Smith, University of North Texas
Kevin Davis, North Central Texas College
Terri Wright, Cal State, Fullerton
Louis DeSipio, University of California–Irvine
Brandon Franke, Blinn College
Fifth Edition Reviewers Steve Garrison, Midwestern State University
Joseph Howard, University of Central Arkansas
Annie Benifield, Tomball College
Aaron Knight, Houston Community College
Denise Dutton, Southwest Missouri State University
Paul Labedz, Valencia Community College
Rick Kurtz, Central Michigan University
Elise Langan, John Jay College
Kelly McDaniel, Three Rivers Community College
Mark Logas, Valencia Community College
Eric Plutzer, Pennsylvania State University
Eric Miller, Blinn College
Daniel Smith, Northwest Missouri State University
Anthony O’Regan, Los Angeles Valley College
Dara Strolovitch, University of Minnesota
David Putz, Kingwood College
Dennis Toombs, San Jacinto College–North
Chis Soper, Pepperdine University
Stacy Ulbig, Southwest Missouri State University
Kevin Wagner, Florida Atlantic University
Laura Wood, Tarrant County College
Sixth Edition Reviewers
Janet Adamski, University of Mary Hardin–Baylor Eighth Edition Reviewers
Greg Andrews, St. Petersburg College
Andrea Aleman, University of Texas at San Antonio
Louis Bolce, Baruch College
Stephen Amberg, University of Texas at San Antonio
Darin Combs, Tulsa Community College
Steve Anthony, Georgia State University
Sean Conroy, University of New Orleans
Brian Arbour, John Jay College, CUNY
Paul Cooke, Cy Fair College
Greg Arey, Cape Fear Community College
Vida Davoudi, Kingwood College
Ellen Baik, University of Texas–Pan American
Robert DiClerico, West Virginia University
David Birch, Lone Star College–Tomball
Corey Ditslear, University of North Texas
Bill Carroll, Sam Houston State University
Kathy Dolan, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Ed Chervenak, University of New Orleans
Randy Glean, Midwestern State University
Gary Church, Mountain View College
Nancy Kral, Tomball College
Adrian Stefan Clark, Del Mar College
Mark Logas, Valencia Community College
Casey Clofstad, University of Miami
Scott MacDougall, Diablo Valley College
Annie Cole, Los Angeles City College
David Mann, College of Charleston
Greg Combs, University of Texas at Dallas
Christopher Muste, University of Montana
Cassandra Cookson, Lee College
Richard Pacelle, Georgia Southern University
Brian Cravens, Blinn College
Sarah Poggione, Florida International University
John Crosby, California State University–Chico
Richard Rich, Virginia Tech
Scott Crosby, Valencia Community College
Thomas Schmeling, Rhode Island College
Courtenay Daum, Colorado State University, Fort Collins
Scott Spitzer, California State University–Fullerton
Paul Davis, Truckee Meadows Community College
Dennis Toombs, San Jacinto College–North
Peter Doas, University of Texas–Pan American
John Vento, Antelope Valley College
Vida Davoudi, Lone Star College–Kingwood
Robert Wood, University of North Dakota
xxii AC K N OW L E D G M E N T S
John Domino, Sam Houston State University Mario Salas, Northwest Vista College
Doug Dow, University of Texas–Dallas Michael Sanchez, San Antonio College
Jeremy Duff, Midwestern State University Mary Schander, Pasadena City College
Heather Evans, Sam Houston State University Laura Schneider, Grand Valley State University
Hyacinth Ezeamii, Albany State University Ronee Schreiber, San Diego State University
Bob Fitrakis, Columbus State Community College Subash Shah, Winston-Salem State University
Brian Fletcher, Truckee Meadows Community College Mark Shomaker, Blinn College
Paul Foote, Eastern Kentucky University Roy Slater, St. Petersburg College
Frank Garrahan, Austin Community College Scott Spitzer, California State University–Fullerton
Jimmy Gleason, Purdue University Debra St. John, Collin College
Steven Greene, North Carolina State University John Vento, Antelope Valley College
Jeannie Grussendorf, Georgia State University Eric Whitaker, Western Washington University
M. Ahad Hayaud-Din, Brookhaven College Clay Wiegand, Cisco College
Virginia Haysley, Lone Star College–Tomball Walter Wilson, University of Texas at San Antonio
Alexander Hogan, Lone Star College–CyFair Kevan Yenerall, Clarion University
Glen Hunt, Austin Community College Rogerio Zapata, South Texas College
Mark Jendrysik, University of North Dakota
Krista Jenkins, Fairleigh Dickinson University
Ninth Edition Reviewers
Carlos Juárez, Hawaii Pacific University
Melinda Kovas, Sam Houston State University Amy Acord, Lone Star College–CyFair
Paul Labedz, Valencia Community College Milan Andrejevich, Ivy Tech Community College
Boyd Lanier, Lamar University Steve Anthony, Georgia State University
Jeff Lazarus, Georgia State University Phillip Ardoin, Appalachian State University
Jeffrey Lee, Blinn College Gregory Arey, Cape Fear Community College
Alan Lehmann, Blinn College Joan Babcock, Northwest Vista College
Julie Lester, Macon State College Evelyn Ballard, Houston Community College
Steven Lichtman, Shippensburg University Robert Ballinger, South Texas College
Mark Logas, Valencia Community College Mary Barnes-Tilley, Blinn College
Fred Lokken, Truckee Meadows Community College Robert Bartels, Evangel University
Shari MacLachlan, Palm Beach Community College Nancy Bednar, Antelope Valley College
Guy Martin, Winston-Salem State University Annie Benifield, Lone Star College–Tomball
Fred Monardi, College of Southern Nevada Donna Bennett, Trinity Valley Community College
Vincent Moscardelli, University of Connecticut Amy Brandon, El Paso Community College
Jason Mycoff, University of Delaware Mark Brewer, The University of Maine
Sugmaran Narayanan, Midwestern State University Gary Brown, Lone Star College–Montgomery
Adam Newmark, Appalachian State University Joe Campbell, Johnson County Community College
Larry Norris, South Plains College Dewey Clayton, University of Louisville
Anthony Nownes, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Jeff Colbert, Elon University
Elizabeth Oldmixon, University of North Texas Amanda Cook-Fesperman, Illinois Valley Community College
Anthony O’Regan, Los Angeles Valley College Kevin Corder, Western Michigan University
John Osterman, San Jacinto College–Central Kevin Davis, North Central Texas College
Mark Peplowski, College of Southern Nevada Paul Davis, Truckee Meadows Community College
Maria Victoria Perez-Rios, John Jay College, CUNY Terri Davis, Lamar University
Sara Rinfret, University of Wisconsin, Green Bay Jennifer De Maio, California State University, Northridge
Andre Robinson, Pulaski Technical College Christopher Durso, Valencia College
Paul Roesler, St. Charles Community College Ryan Emenaker, College of the Redwoods
Susan Roomberg, University of Texas at San Antonio Leslie Feldman, Hofstra University
Ryan Rynbrandt, Collin County Community College Glen Findley, Odessa College
AC K N OW L E D G M E N T S xxiii
Michael Gattis, Gulf Coast State College Tenth Edition Reviewers
Donna Godwin, Trinity Valley Community College
Stephen P. Amberg, University of Texas at San Antonio
Precious Hall, Truckee Meadows Community College
Juan F. Arzola, College of the Sequoias
Sally Hansen, Daytona State College
Thomas J. Baldino, Wilkes University
Tiffany Harper, Collin College
Christina Bejarano, University of Kansas
Todd Hartman, Appalachian State University
Paul T. Bellinger, Jr., University of Missouri
Virginia Haysley, Lone Star College–Tomball
Melanie J. Blumberg, California University of Pennsylvania
David Head, John Tyler Community College
Matthew T. Bradley, Indiana University Kokomo
Rick Henderson, Texas State University–San Marcos
Jeffrey W. Christiansen, Seminole State College
Richard Herrera, Arizona State University
McKinzie Craig, Marietta College
Thaddaus Hill, Blinn College
Christopher Cronin, Methodist University
Steven Holmes, Bakersfield College
Jenna Duke, Lehigh Carbon Community College
Kevin Holton, South Texas College
Francisco Durand, University of Texas at San Antonio
Robin Jacobson, University of Puget Sound
Carrie Eaves, Elon University
Joseph Jozwiak, Texas A & M–Corpus Christi
Paul M. Flor, El Camino College Compton Center
Casey Klofstad, University of Miami
Adam Fuller, Youngstown State University
Samuel Lingrosso, Los Angeles Valley College
Christi Gramling, Charleston Southern University
Mark Logas, Valencia College
Sally Hansen, Daytona State College
Christopher Marshall, South Texas College
Mary Jane Hatton, Hawai’i Pacific University
Larry McElvain, South Texas College
David Helpap, University of Wisconsin–Green Bay
Elizabeth McLane, Wharton County Junior College
Theresa L. Hutchins, Georgia Highlands College
Eddie Meaders, University of North Texas
Cryshanna A. Jackson Leftwich, Youngstown State University
Rob Mellen, Mississippi State University
Ashlyn Kuersten, Western Michigan University
Jalal Nejad, Northwest Vista College
Kara Lindaman, Winona State University
Adam Newmark, Appalachian State University
Timothy Lynch, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Stephen Nicholson, University of California, Merced
Larry McElvain, South Texas College
Cissie Owen, Lamar University
Corinna R. McKoy, Ventura College
Suzanne Preston, St. Petersburg College
Eddie L. Meaders, University of North Texas
David Putz, Lone Star College–Kingwood
Don D. Mirjanian, College of Southern Nevada
Auksuole Rubavichute, Mountain View College
R. Shea Mize, Georgia Highlands College
Ronnee Schreiber, San Diego State University
Nicholas Morgan, Collin College
Ronald Schurin, University of Connecticut
Matthew Murray, Dutchess Community College
Jason Seitz, Georgia Perimeter College
Harold “Trey” Orndorff III, Daytona State College
Jennifer Seitz, Georgia Perimeter College
Randall Parish, University of North Georgia
Shannon Sinegal,The University of New Orleans
Michelle Pautz, University of Dayton
John Sides, George Washington University
Michael Pickering, University of New Orleans
Thomas Sowers, Lamar University
Donald Ranish, Antelope Valley College
Jim Startin, University of Texas at San Antonio
Glenn W. Richardson, Jr., Kutztown University
Robert Sterken, University of Texas at Tyler
of Pennsylvania
Bobby Summers, Harper College
Jason Robles, Colorado State University
John Theis, Lone Star College–Kingwood
Ionas Aurelian Rus, University of Cincinnati–Blue Ash
John Todd, University of North Texas
Robert Sahr, Oregon State University
Delaina Toothman, The University of Maine
Kelly B. Shaw, Iowa State University
David Trussell, Cisco College
Captain Michael Slattery, Campbell University
Ronald Vardy, University of Houston
Michael Smith, Sam Houston State University
Linda Veazey, Midwestern State University
Maryam T. Stevenson, University of Indianapolis
John Vento, Antelope Valley Community College
Elizabeth Trentanelli, Gulf Coast State College
Clif Wilkinson, Georgia College
Ronald W. Vardy, University of Houston
John Wood, Rose State College
Timothy Weaver, University of Louisville
Michael Young, Trinity Valley Community College
Christina Wolbrecht, University of Notre Dame
Tyler Young, Collin College
xxiv AC K N OW L E D G E M E N T S
We are also grateful to Holley Hansen, of Oklahoma State University, who con-
tributed to the “America Side by Side” boxes, and to Gabrielle Ellul for research
assistance.
Perhaps above all, we wish to thank those at W. W. Norton. For its first five edi-
tions, editor Steve Dunn helped us shape the book in countless ways. Ann Shin
carried on the Norton tradition of splendid editorial work on the Sixth through
Ninth Editions. Our current editor, Lisa McKay, has brought smart ideas and a
keen editorial eye to this Tenth Edition. For our Coursepack and other instruc-
tor resources for the book, Toni Magyar has been an energetic and visionary
editor. Nina Hnatov copyedited the manuscript, and our superb project editor
Christine D’Antonio devoted countless hours keeping on top of myriad details.
Ashley Horna has been dedicated in managing production. We thank Julie Tesser
for finding new photos. Finally, we wish to thank Roby Harrington, the head of
Norton’s college department.
Benjamin Ginsberg
Theodore J. Lowi
Margaret Weir
Caroline J. Tolbert
November 2014
AC K N OW L E D G M E N T S xxv
TENTH CORE EDITION
We the People
AN INTRODUCTION TO AMERICAN POLITICS
Most Americans share the core
political values of liberty, equality,
and democracy and want their
government and its policies to reflect
these values. However, people often
disagree on the meaning of these
values and what government should
do to protect them.
American
1
Political Culture
WHAT GOVERNMENT DOES AND WHY IT MATTERS Americans sometimes appear to believe
that the government is an institution that does things to them and from which they need protection.
Students may wonder why they have to fill in long, often complicated forms to apply for financial
assistance. They may frown when they see the payroll tax deducted from their small paycheck. Like
Americans of all ages, they may resent municipal “red-light” cameras designed to photograph traffic
violators—and send them tickets.
Although most people complain about something that government does to them, most everyone
wants the government to do a great deal for them. Some of the services that people expect from
government are big-ticket items, such as providing national security and keeping the nation safe from
terrorist attacks. We all know that government pays for and directs the military. Students attending a
state university know that state and federal public dollars help support their education.
Yet many of the other services that government provides are far less visible, and often it is not
even clear that government plays a role at all. For example, students grabbing a quick bite to eat
between classes take it for granted that their hamburger will not contain bacteria that might make
them sick. Without federal inspection of meat, however, chances of contracting food-borne illnesses
would be much higher and the everyday task of eating would be much riskier. Driving to school would
not be possible if not for the tens of billions of dollars spent each year on road construction and
maintenance by federal, state, and municipal authorities. Like most Americans, young people expect
to get reliable information about the weather for the week ahead and warnings about dangerous
3
events such as hurricanes. The National Weather Service and the National
Hurricane Center both provide reliable forecasts for such simple calculations
as whether to bring an umbrella to more significant calculations made by air-
lines and air traffic control to get travelers safely where they need to go. These
daily decisions don’t seem to involve government but in fact they do. Indeed,
most Americans would not be here at all if it were not for federal immigration
policies, which set the terms for entry into the United States and for obtaining
citizenship.
government institutions and Government is the term generally used to describe the formal institutions
procedures through which a
territory and its people are ruled
through which a land and its people are ruled. As the government seeks to
help and protect its citizens, it faces the challenge of doing so in ways that
are true to the key American political values of liberty, equality, and democ-
racy. Most Americans find it easy to affirm all three values in principle. In
practice, however, matters are not always so clear; these values mean differ-
ent things to different people, and they often seem to conflict. This is where
politics conflict over the politics comes in. Politics refers to conflicts and struggles over the leadership,
leadership, structure, and
policies of governments
structure, and policies of governments. As we will see in this chapter and
throughout this book, much political conflict concerns policies and practices
that seem to affirm one of the key American political values but may contradict
another.
chaptergoals
Explore Americans’ attitudes toward government (pp. 5–9)
Describe the role of the citizen in politics (pp. 9–13)
Define government and forms of government (pp. 13–17)
Show how the social composition of the American population has
changed over time (pp. 17–24)
Analyze whether the U.S. system of government upholds American
political values (pp. 24–31)
4 CHAPTER 1 A M E R I C A N P O L I T I C A L C U LT U R E
What Americans Think about Government
Since the United States was established as
Explore Americans’ a nation, Americans have been reluctant to
attitudes toward grant government too much power, and they
government have often been suspicious of politicians.
But over the course of the nation’s history,
Americans have also turned to government
for assistance in times of need and have strongly supported the government in pe-
riods of war. In 1933 the power of the government began to expand to meet the
crises created by the stock market crash of 1929, the Great Depression, and the run
on banks of 1933. Congress passed legislation that brought the government into the
businesses of home mortgages, farm mortgages, credit, and relief of personal distress.
More recently, when the economy threatened to fall into a deep recession in 2008
and 2009, the federal government stepped in to shore up the financial system, over-
see the restructuring of the ailing auto companies, and inject hundreds of billions of
dollars into the faltering economy. Today the national government is an enormous
institution with programs and policies reaching into every corner of American life.
It oversees the nation’s economy; it is the nation’s largest employer; it provides
citizens with a host of services; it controls the world’s most formidable military; and
it regulates a wide range of social and commercial activities.
Much of what citizens have come to depend on and take for granted as some-
how part of the natural environment is in fact created by government. Take the
example of a typical college student’s day, throughout which that student relies on
The federal government maintains a large number of websites that provide useful information
to citizens on such topics as loans for education, civil service job applications, the inflation rate,
and how the weather will affect farming. These sites are just one way in which the government
serves its citizens.
W H AT A M E R I C A N S T H I N K A B O U T G OV E R N M E N T 5
a host of services and activities organized by national, state, and local government
agencies. The extent of this dependence on government is illustrated by Table 1.1
on page 7.
Trust in Government
Ironically, even as popular dependence on the government has grown, the Ameri-
can public’s view of government has turned more sour. Public trust in government
has declined, and Americans are now more likely to feel that they can do little to
influence the government’s actions. The decline in public trust among Americans
is striking. In the early 1960s, three-quarters of Americans said they trusted gov-
ernment most of the time. By 2013, only 19 percent of Americans expressed trust
in government; 68 stated that they did not trust government most of the time1
(see Figure 1.1). Different groups vary somewhat in their levels of trust: African
Americans and Latinos express more confidence in the federal government than
do whites. But even among the most supportive groups, considerably more than
half do not trust the government.2 These developments are important because
politically engaged citizens and public confidence in government are vital for the
health of a democracy.
In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, a number of
studies reported a substantial increase in popular trust in government.3 This view,
expressed during a period of national crisis, may have been indicative less of a re-
newed trust in government to do the right thing than of a fervent hope that it would.
PERCENTAGE RESPONDING
FIGURE 1.1 “MOST OF THE TIME” OR “ALWAYS”
Trust in 80
The government’s response to the
Government, September 11 terrorist attacks helped
lift popular trust above the 50 percent
1958–2013 70
By 1980, trust in
level for the first time in decades.
Participants in these polls were government had
asked if they trusted the gov- dropped to about the
60
25 percent level.
ernment to “do the right thing”
always, most of the time, only
some of the time, or never. 50
Since the 1960s, general
levels of public trust in govern-
ment have declined. What 40
factors might help to account
for changes in the public’s
trust in government? Why 30
has confidence in govern-
ment dropped again since
20
September 11, 2001?
In 2013, only 19 percent
SOURCES: The American National
of Americans trusted
Election Studies, 1958–2004; Pew
10 the government.
Research Center, www.people-press
.org/2013/10/18/trust-in-government
-nears-record-Iow-but-most-federal
-agencies-are-viewed-favorably (accessed
0
5/14/14). 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012
6 CHAPTER 1 A M E R I C A N P O L I T I C A L C U LT U R E
TABLE 1.1
7:10 AM Shower. Water courtesy of local government, either a public entity or a regulated private company. Brush
your teeth with toothpaste whose cavity-fighting claims have been verified by a federal agency. Dry your
hair with an electric dryer manufactured according to federal government agency guidelines.
7:30 AM Have a bowl of cereal with milk for breakfast. “Nutrition Facts” on food labels are a federal requirement,
pasteurization of milk required by state law, freshness dating on milk based on state and federal
standards, recycling the empty cereal box and milk carton enabled by state or local laws.
8:30 AM Drive or take public transportation to campus. Air bags and seat belts required by federal and state laws.
Roads and bridges paid for by state and local governments, speed and traffic laws set by state and local
governments, public transportation subsidized by all levels of government.
8:45 AM Arrive on campus of large public university. Buildings are 70 percent financed by state taxpayers.
9:00 AM First class: Chemistry 101. Tuition partially paid by a federal loan (more than half the cost of university
instruction is paid for by taxpayers), chemistry lab paid for with grants from the National Science
Foundation (a federal agency) and smaller grants from business corporations made possible by federal
income tax deductions for charitable contributions.
Noon Eat lunch. College cafeteria financed by state dormitory authority on land grant from federal Department
of Agriculture.
12:47 PM Felt an earthquake! Check the U.S. Geological Survey at www.usgs.gov to see that it was a 3.9 on the
Richter scale.
2:00 PM Second class: American Government 101 (your favorite class!). You may be taking this class because it
is required by the state legislature or because it fulfills a university requirement.
4:00 PM Third class: Computer Lab. Free computers, software, and Internet access courtesy of state subsidies plus
grants and discounts from IBM and Microsoft, the costs of which are deducted from their corporate income
taxes; Internet built in part by federal government. Duplication of software prohibited by federal copyright laws.
6:00 PM Eat dinner: hamburger and french fries. Meat inspected for bacteria by federal agencies.
7:00 PM Work at part-time job at the campus library. Minimum wage set by federal, state, or local government,
books and journals in library paid for by state taxpayers.
8:15 PM Go online to check the status of your application for a federal student loan (FAFSA) on the Department of
Education’s website at studentaid.ed.gov.
10:00 PM Go home. Street lighting paid for by county and city governments, police patrols by city government.
10:15 PM Watch TV. Networks regulated by federal government, cable public-access channels required by city law.
Weather forecast provided to broadcasters by a federal agency.
10:45 PM To complete your economics homework, visit the Bureau of Labor Statistics at www.bls.gov to look up
unemployment levels since 1972.
Midnight Put out the trash before going to bed. Trash collected by city sanitation department, financed by “user
charges.”
W H AT A M E R I C A N S T H I N K A B O U T G OV E R N M E N T 7
In response to the terrorist attacks
of September 11, 2001, Americans
rallied around government officials
and offered unprecedented support.
Is support for the government
during times of crisis at odds with
Americans’ distrust of government
at other times?
And, indeed, by 2004, trust in government had fallen to near its pre-September
11 level.4 Several factors contributed to the decline in trust. Revelations about the
faulty information that led up to the war in Iraq and ongoing concern about the
war had increased Americans’ distrust of government. In March 2007, 54 percent
of those surveyed believed that the Bush administration had deliberately misled
the American public about whether Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.
By 2013 intense partisan conflict further undermined trust in government. The
public watched with dismay as political differences over taxing and spending led
to repeated threats to shut down the federal government. In the fall of 2011, after
a bitter congressional battle over raising the national debt limit—usually a routine
matter—only 10 percent of Americans trusted government to do the right thing
always or most of the time, the lowest level of trust ever recorded.5 When politi-
cal differences over the Affordable Care Act, a new social program supported by
President Obama to reform the American health care system, led to a government
shutdown in 2013 and yet another dramatic showdown over raising the national
debt limit, public trust once again dipped to historically low levels.
Does it matter if Americans trust their government? For the most part, the answer
is yes. As we have seen, most Americans rely on government for a wide range of ser-
vices and laws that they simply take for granted. But long-term distrust in government
forcriticalanalysis can result in public refusal to pay taxes adequate to support such widely approved
public activities. Low levels of confidence may also make it difficult for government
What recent events have to attract talented and effective workers to public service.6 The weakening of govern-
affected Americans’ trust in
ment as a result of prolonged levels of distrust may ultimately harm the United States’
government? What might it
take to restore Americans’ trust capacity to defend its national interest in the world economy and may jeopardize its
in the federal government? national security. Likewise, a weak government can do little to assist citizens who
need help in weathering periods of sharp economic or technological change.
Political Efficacy
Another important trend in American views about government has been a de-
political efficacy the ability to clining sense of political efficacy, the belief that ordinary citizens can affect what
influence government and politics government does, that they can make government listen to them. In 2014,
78 percent of Americans said that elected officials don’t care what people like
8 CHAPTER 1 A M E R I C A N P O L I T I C A L C U LT U R E
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.