You are on page 1of 144

18-03-2019

Training Workshop
Critical Analysis & Prevention of Boiler Pressure
Parts Failure

Ansuman Sen Sharma

India Boiler dot Com

What is our
objective?

1
18-03-2019

To Understand Analytically How &


Why Boiler Tube Fails

To Increase Reliability of Boiler by


Preventing Tube Failures

Why & How Boiler Tubes Get Damaged


and Fail ??

2
18-03-2019

Damage Mechanisms for


Boiler Tube Failures

Various Damage Mechanisms in which Boiler Tube


Fails are:

Over heating
Stress
Corrosion
Erosion
Fatigue
Combined Stress & corrosion

3
18-03-2019

Route from Failures to their Prevention

After each BT Failure


→ Identification of DM
→ Identification of RCs
→ Identification of PMs
→ Implementation of PMs
→ → Prevention of similar BT
failure

But why wait for


the Boiler Tubes to Fail????

4
18-03-2019

Route to Failure

Generation of RC (Root Cause)


RC develop UC (Undesirable Conditions)
UC initiate DM
DM/s lead to failure

RC →UC →DM → Failure

DM – Irreversible & Accumulative

Almost all DMs i.e. Creep, Fatigue,


Corrosion, Erosion, Embrittlement are
IRREVERSIBLE and ACCUMULATIVE type
damages.

Failure occur whenever there is ‗Total


accumulation of damage/s‘

5
18-03-2019

Damage Prone Locations

Meaningful damage assessment is


possible if DPL (damage prone locations)
are known.

Each DM may be more effective at


different locations.

Awareness and Updating DPL help in


their periodic examination

Prevention of Boiler Tube


Failures

6
18-03-2019

We should know

What adverse conditions are


present in the boiler system?

What are the metallurgies of the


pressure parts and what are their
limitations to such adverse
conditions?

What are the indications which


would suggest that the limitations
could be breached?

What are the adverse Conditions


under which a Boiler operates?

7
18-03-2019

Temperature inside the furnace : 1100 -1200oC

8
18-03-2019

Water Tube Boiler:

Temperature limit for Oxidation


characteristics of various metal used in
Boiler:

Carbon Steel: 425oC (456oC)


LAS T11: 550oC
LAS T22: 580oC

9
18-03-2019

Allowable stress: (ASME Section II, Part D[8])

Criterions to be considered to draw the trend


curve
TS/ 3.5
2/3 x YS
A Percentage of creep rupture strength

Primary Secondary Tertiary

For Carbon Steel, creep begins at about 370oC

10
18-03-2019

Development of Creep:

The Larson-Miller Parameter (LMP) can be used


to determine the expected life of a component.

LMP = (ºF + 460) (C + Log10t) (10-3)

C is a constant taken as
20 for CS and LAS

11
18-03-2019

What other adverse Conditions?

12
18-03-2019

Longitudinal Stress & Hoop


Stress in a cylinder:
σL = (P x D) / 4 t
σc = (P x D) / 2 t

σc = (P x D ) / 2 t

When σc exceeds σAllowable……..Tube fails in the


longitudinal direction

13
18-03-2019

14
18-03-2019

Let us now take a look at the type of


metals, that are being used for Boiler
Pressure parts and their limitations

Sign in front of a Boiler system

15
18-03-2019

Basic MET of Fe family

IRONS: Irons without any alloying


element.
In past, WROUGHT IRON was very
widely used as building materials.
Presently it is used only as Iron
Utensils.

STEELS: Iron with Carbon as alloying


element up to its maximum ‗solubility‘.

CAST IRONS: Iron with carbon, higher


than the solubility.

Carbon Steel

Plain Carbon Steels: Only Carbon is


alloying element.
[They are also simply called as
‗Carbon Steels‘]

….As per amount of carbon, They are


‗Low carbon‘ (<0.25%),
‗Medium carbon‘ (0.25% - 0.50%)
and
‗High carbon‘ steels (>0.50%)

16
18-03-2019

Alloy Steels: Alloying element/s in


addition to carbon.

Low Alloy Steels: If total alloying less


than 10%.

High Alloy Steels: If total alloying more


than 10%.
18-8 Stainless Steels & Tool Steels are
some of High Alloy Steels.

Materials used in Boiler Pressure


Parts

17
18-03-2019

Carbon Steel (low carbon)

Tubes Pipes Plates Forgings Castings

SA179 SA106GrB SA36 SA266CL1 SA216WCA


SA192 SA333Gr1 SA515Gr55 SA350LF1 SA352LCA
SA210GrA1 SA333Gr6 SA515Gr60 SA352LCB
SA334Gr1 SA515Gr65
SA334Gr6 SA516Gr55
SA516Gr60
SA516Gr65

Carbon Steel (medium carbon)

Tubes Pipes Plates Forgings Castings

SA210GrC SA106GrC SA515Gr70 SA105 SA216WCB


SA516Gr70 SA266CL2SS SA216WCC
SA299 A350LF2 SA352LCC

18
18-03-2019

1¼ Cr ½ Mo

Tubes Pipes Plates Forgings Castings


SA213T11 SA335P11 SA387Gr11 SA182F11

2¼Cr 1Mo

Tubes Pipes Plates Forgings Castings

SA213T22 SA335P22 SA387Gr22 SA182F22 SA217WC9

19
18-03-2019

9Cr 1Mo ¼ V

Tubes Pipes Plates Forgings Castings

SA213T91 SA335P91 SA387Gr91 SA182F91


SA199T91

Cr - Ni

Tubes Pipes Plates Forgings Castings

SA213TP304 SA376TP304 SA240TP304 SA182F304 SA351CF3


SA213TP304H SA376TP304H SA240TP321 SA182F321 SA351CF8
SA213TP316 SA376TP316 SA240TP347 SA182F347 SA351CF3M
SA213TP321 SA376TP321 SA336F304 SA351CF8M
SA213TP347 SA376TP347 SA336F321 SA351CF10
SA213TP347H SA376TP347H SA336F347 SA351CF10M

20
18-03-2019

Material specifications for Heat Exchanging Elements


Sr. Heat Exchanging Elements Specification
No.

I ECONOMISER
Economiser Coils SA 210 Gr. A1

II WATERWALL
1. Wall Panels SA 210 Gr. A1
2. Platen assemblies SA 210 Gr. A1

III SUPERHEATER
1. Radiant roof Panel SA 210 Gr. A1, SA 209 T1
2. SCW – side walls SA 210 Gr. A1
3. SCW – front wall panel -do-
4. SCW – Roof & rear wall panel -do-
5. LTSH (Low temp.) Assembly SA 210 Gr. A1, SA 209 T1,
SA 213 T11
6. Platen S.H. Vertical assembly SA 213 T11, SA 213 T22,
7. Final S.H. Vertical assembly SA 213 TP 347 H
SA 213 T22

IV REHEATER
Reheater coils SA 209, T1, SA 213 T11,
SA 213 T22, SA 213 T91

With Material Selection Limitations BT


Material is ‗just about sufficient‘ in meeting
‗the service conditions‘

And is ‗highly sensitive‘ to even little deviation


in:
 temperature of water & steam
 chemistry of water & steam
 temperature of flue gas
 flue gas velocity
 Stress (i.e. working pressure)

21
18-03-2019

Temperature Sensitivity:
55°F (30.5oC) rise >>> 90% Creep life loss
10°F (5.5oC) rise >>> 60% Creep life loss

Example: T 22 LAS,
1000°F (538°C) – 3,47,520 hrs.- 40 yrs.
1050°F (567°C) – 49,573 hrs.- 5.7 yrs.

And….…when the temperature is about 1235° (668°C)

only 100 hrs, i.e. 4 days!!!!!!

Stress Sensitivity:
with stress rise of 10%, i.e. working
pressure rise 10%, or thickness
reduction 10%......

>>>>>>>>> 50% Creep life loss

22
18-03-2019

Flue Gas Velocity Sensitivity:


For fly ash of Indian coal,
Abrasiveness is proportional to 5th
power of velocity..

So…. 10% increase in FG volume may


increase abrasive power by 60%!!!

Water chemistry sensitivity & Flue


Gas chemistry sensitivity…

………is Justified & Necessary

23
18-03-2019

Damage Mechanisms

DM – Overheating / Creep

At low temperature, metals take


considerable long time for failing in
Creep (i.e. deform with time and
rupture).

At high temperature metals fail


‗significantly‘ (in reasonable time)
in Creep.

These temperatures are called


‗Creep Regime‘.

24
18-03-2019

With Over heating (actual temp. more


than design temp) BT will fail
‗prematurely‘

Accordingly OH (Over heating) DMs


are categorized as STOH (Short Time
OH ) and LTOH (Long Time OH)

Commonly Large bulge and thin lip


(facture edges) are features of STOH

25
18-03-2019

Short Time Over Heating

Small bulge and thick lip are features


of LTOH in general.

26
18-03-2019

Long Time Over Heating

Long Time Over Heating

27
18-03-2019

Generally, as per prevailing avg.


metal temp., ECO, WW, and SCW-SH
systems are below ‗creep regime‘.

LTOH is almost rare ( except in partial


chocking cases) in these systems.

In WW, with some abnormalities,


STOH failures are common.

Case Study (STOH):


120 MW PF Thermal Plant Boiler
Location: Final SH

28
18-03-2019

Case Study:
120 MW PF Thermal Plant Boiler
Location: Final SH
Occurrence: R&M completed on 22nd May……and
1st Failure: 31st May
2nd Failure: 7th June
3rd Failure: 13th June
4th Failure: 19th June Replaced tube failed
5 Failure: 26 June
th th

6th Failure: 27th July


7th Failure: 9th August
8th Failure: 18th August

29
18-03-2019

Visual Inspection

Microstructure

30
18-03-2019

Metal Temperature was persistently on the higher side


(~ 550-590oC)

Flue gas to inlet of FSH was recorded more than


1000oC

Cause was identified as a case of delayed combustion

Initially burner tilting was adjusted; but problem still


persisted to some extent.

Subsequently inlet SH temperature was reduced by


removing part of Primary SH

Case Study (LTOH):


210 MW PF Thermal Plant Boiler
Location: Hot Reheat

31
18-03-2019

Failure location: bottom bends of inner two


coils of hot reheat area

Unit commissioned in 1986 and Failure started


after only 12 years( in 1998 )

32
18-03-2019

Failure at HRH

Initial two occurances believed to be isolated


cases of partial chocking

Few more occurances ruled out partial


chocking

All boiler parameters within limit. Hence


reason for overheating not apparent
Steam temperature was remaining around
550 - 560oC instead of 540oC even after full
attemperation

33
18-03-2019

Learnt through discussion:


Excessive De-superheating spraying was
necessary for keeping outlet temperature
within the specified maximum since beginning
of the unit operation

Manufacturers agreed that heat exchanging


surface area is more

Over Heating Causes &


Prevention

34
18-03-2019

Water Walls

Circulating Water & Steam Circuit:

35
18-03-2019

Natural Circulation:
Temperature of steam and Water in the
whole Evaporator system is Ts

Water
Mixture of steam
and Water

Furnace Temperature in the range


of 1100o to 1200oC

Carbon Steel; SA 210 Gr. A1/ C

Creep starts in Carbon Steel at 370oC and it doesn’t have


strength against creep

36
18-03-2019

Nucleate Boiling :

Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB):

Film Boiling

37
18-03-2019

Over Heating Failure

Why the bubbles are getting dislodged


and going up?

Is it because of buoyancy since steam


density is less than water density?

38
18-03-2019

At Atmospheric pressure the difference is


nearly 1600 times

Whereas at 120 kg/ cm2 absolute drum


pressure, it is only 9.6 times

At critical pressure both densities are same

Steam bubbles are coming out in


Nucleate Boiling : Nucleate Boiling

39
18-03-2019

Steam bubbles formed and


sticking at the bottom

Departure from Nucleate


Boiling :

But the density difference is nearly


1600 times!

Therefore it is not the buoyancy!!

It is the flow in the water due to natural


circulation, which is influencing the Nucleate
boiling

40
18-03-2019

Natural Circulation

Down comer
ρr ρd
Riser

ΔP = H ρd g - H ρr g = H g (ρd – ρr)

Natural Circulation

ΔP = H g (ρd – ρr)

Therefore circulation would be maximum at


MCR

41
18-03-2019

120oC
500

300oC
120

Overheating of evaporator tube and


raptures are caused by:

Poor Circulation

High Heat Flux – more than Critical Heat


Flux

42
18-03-2019

Natural Circulation
Drum Level

Down comer
ρr ρd
Riser

ΔP = H g (ρd – ρr)

Factors inducing DNB and tube


overheating

Fast Ramp up during cold start

Low drum level

Obstruction due to foreign object fouling


the tube

Formation of scale inside the tube

Flame shifting towards one side wall

86

43
18-03-2019

Disturbance of Water Chemistry due to Steam Blanketing:

Increase in concentration of
contaminants

SH & RH Tubes

44
18-03-2019

Few things to remember:

SH and RH tubes pick up the sensible heat

H = m C ∆t

89

Factors inducing SH/ RH tube


overheating

Frequent Low Load Operation LTOH

High Excess Air LTOH in LTSH

Obstruction due to exfoliated oxide scale


accumulation in bends STOH
Delayed combustion LTOH/ STOH

Charcoal start in FBC STOH in BSH

90

45
18-03-2019

Factors contributing to delayed


combustion:
Fuel fines

Low SA/ PA ratio – High Primary Air

Improper Turbulence – Low SA

High VM coal

91

Coal size distribution For PF Boiler.

70% < 200 mesh (75 micron)

Size Distribution : 100 – 150 ~ 30%


75 - 100 ~ 10%
Retention in 50 mesh should be less than 1%

0.2%
70 – 75% < 200 mesh

75 - 80% < 200 mesh

75 - 80% < 200 mesh

80 - 85% < 200 mesh

80 - 85% < 200 mesh

46
18-03-2019

Effect of higher Primary Air in PF Boilers:

when the primary airflow is very high, the fuel particles


―outrun‖ the secondary air and result in longer-than-
optimum flames

SADC Wind Box Auxiliary Air Distribution


B, C, D, E in service
FF __ %

F __ %

EF __ %

E __ %
Minimum
DE __ %

D __ %

CD __ %

C
EF> DE> CD> BC> AB
__ %

BC __ %

B __ %

AB __ %

A __ %
NIL
AA __ % Minimum

47
18-03-2019

Indicators

48
18-03-2019

49
18-03-2019

Damage Mechanisms - Fatigue

DM - Fatigue

MECHANICAL FATIGUE :
If fluctuating stress is only mechanical
than fatigue is called mechanical fatigue

THERMAL FATIGUE :
Cracking of metal due to fluctuating
temperature is called thermal fatigue

CORRSION FATIGUE.
Cracking because of combined actions of
fatigue and corrosion, is called corrosion
fatigue.

50
18-03-2019

Case Study (Mechanical Fatigue):


120 MW PF Thermal Plant Boiler
Location: Rear Water Wall

51
18-03-2019

Case Study (Mechanical Fatigue):


120 MW PF Thermal Plant Boiler
Location: Rear Water Wall
Occurrence after 14 years of service
Three tubes at corner no. 3 from goose neck to bottom ‗z‘
bend were out of their position and broken into three /
four pieces!!
Front

Rear
Tubes were fractured transversely!!!

 No signs of plastic deformation at edges of


fracture
 No signs of corrosion
 No signs of over heating

These indicated Brittle failure due to


Mechanical Fatigue

52
18-03-2019

It should be noted that the wall construction


was not of Membrane type but of Tangent
type

Membrane Wall Tangent Wall

Root Cause was identified as longer spacing


between the anchor supports leading to
excessive vibration due to water hammering
in the wall tubes

53
18-03-2019

Case Study (Thermal Fatigue):


120 MW PF Thermal Plant Boiler
Location: HRH …..about 2m below roof
Similar failure twice:
• 3rd may 2001
• 9th may 2001

First failure: appeared to be because of


flue gas erosion

Second failure: also appeared to be of


same reason

54
18-03-2019

Contradiction: location was not erosion


prone!!!!!

….. After a closer inspection of one of


the failed pieces…..

55
18-03-2019

Crack: Fatigue due to restriction to thermal


expansion & contraction at welded clit

All other failures were due to secondary


erosion damage

Clits of similar locations cut

Mechanical anchoring provided during next


AOH

Thermal Fatigue Failure

56
18-03-2019

Usually Creep / Overheating DM


result into ‗longitudinal‘ cracking and
Fatigue DM result into ‗transverse‘
cracking.

Transverse fatigue cracking usually


occur at HAZ of WJs.

This failure occur after many starts


and stops. Regular NDT checks may
detect initiation of this type of
cracking.

Corrosion Fatigue Failure

Corrosion Fatigue

57
18-03-2019

Damage Mechanisms - Erosion

DM - Erosion

Some very important aspects:


High ‗ash content‘ and higher amount of
‗alpha quartz‘ (and generating full
capacity steam) makes resultant ‗Flue
Gas‘ highly abrasive.

Pure steam, water, air or gas in never


abrasive. Suspended solid particles make
them abrasive/erosive.

High Energy jet of such mediums usually


cause damage by high temperature metal
cutting and not by erosion/ abrasion

58
18-03-2019

Erosion Damage is referred as EMW (External


Metal Wastage). EMW is a major group in
which tube components loose a part of
external surface
The mechanisms known for EMW are:
FGE (Flue gas erosion)
SJE (Steam jet erosion /cutting)
[secondary damage of adjacent tubes
through escaping steam from a punctured
tube]
WBJE (Wall blower jet erosion Coal air jet
erosion, basically a SJE)

CAE (Coal air erosion)

SAE (Secondary air erosion)

FSE (Falling slag erosion), and

Air ingress assisted ash erosion.

59
18-03-2019

Case Study (FGE):


120 MW PF Thermal Plant Boiler
Location: Final RH – Rear Assy. No 24
Tube No 2 bend
Occurrence: after 1,60,000Hrs.

• The bent tube shows severe external


metal wastage, wall thinning and
consequent failure with thin lips.

• Some oxide scales are observed on


both the ID and OD surfaces of the
tube

• ….And the service life was


considerably long

60
18-03-2019

Transverse section of the tube at the


failure as well as a distant ring piece
was micro examined to check over
heating aspect.

Failed lip – Microstructure. Ring section – Microstructure.

No significant difference in the Microstructures


confirmed over all creep degradation and the
failure cause was identified as FGE

Soot Blower Erosion

61
18-03-2019

Fouling & Slagging:

Fouling & Slagging:

Fusing of ash take place,


If furnace temperature exceeds Initial Deformation range of ash
• Reducing atmosphere lowers the Initial Deformation
Temperature
• Ferrous iron content (Fe2) increases and act as catalyst in
substantially lowering IDT of ash
• When ratio of SiO2 to total oxides is high, slagging is less. At <
0.6 slagging high
• Delay in evacuation of bottom ash, results in build up of slag
• Design features of boiler furnace and bottom hopper

62
18-03-2019

Fouling & Slagging Indicator:

When percentage Iron Oxide - Fe2O3 in Ash by weight is:


• 3 to 8 -- Non- slagging
• 8 to 15 -- Slagging to some extent
• 15 to 23 -- High slagging property

Base to Acid Ratio 0.4 - 0.6 >> High Slagging possibility

Oxide Range (%) by wt Acidic (A)/ Basic (B)


SiO2 10–70 A
Al2O3 8–38 A
Fe2O3 2–50 B
CaO 0.5–30 B
MgO 0.3–8 B
Na2O 0.1–8 B
K2O 0.1–3 B
TiO2 0.4–3.5 A
SO3 0.1–30 A

Fouling & Slagging Indicator:

when slagging index of Ash is in the range of:


• 1230 to 1340 deg C -- Medium slagging property
• 1050 to 1230 deg C -- High slagging property
• < 1050 deg C -- Severe slagging property

4 IDT + HT IDT - Initial Deformation


Slagging Index Fs is ------------------ Temperature
5 HT - Hemisphere
Temperature

63
18-03-2019

Fouling & Slagging Indicator:

FEGT should be 50 – 55oC less than IDT

Furnace exit O2 should be more than 3% in case of slagging


coal

PA to SA ratio should be optimum

Damage Mechanisms - Corrosion

64
18-03-2019

CORROSION:
WATER SIDE CORROSION
• Low pH Corrosion
• Oxygen pitting
• Caustic / Acid Attack
• Caustic Gouging

FIRE SIDE CORROSION:


• Low temperature / cold end corrosion
• Harmful metals, Sulfur and Chlorine
• Corrosive characteristics of ash
• Slag deposits

Combined Stress & Corrosion

Hydrogen Embrittlement

Caustic Embrittlement

Stress Corrosion Cracking

65
18-03-2019

FIRE SIDE CORROSION


Low Temperature / Cold End Corrosion

FIRE SIDE CORROSION


Low Temperature / Cold End Corrosion
CORROSION MECHANISM
• S + O2 ® SO2
• 2SO2 + O2 ® 2SO3 (V2O5 catalyzes reaction)
• SO2 + O [Atomic Oxygen] ® SO3
• SO3 + H2O ® H2SO4
• SO2 + H2O ® H2SO3 [Sulphurus Acid]

REASONS
• Sulfur in fuel
• Sodium or Vanadium Pentoxide and ferric oxide in
fuel
• Excess Oxygen
• Low Economizer inlet temperature
• Low gas/ air temperature at APH inlet

66
18-03-2019

FUEL ASH CORROSION

CLOSE-UP VIEW OF TUBE PIT FIRE SIDE CORROSION

FUEL ASH CORROSION


REASONS:

• Presence of sodium and Vanadium in fuel


• Boiler operation under oxidizing
atmosphere
• Formation of low melting (995F)
Pentoxides of Sodium (Na2O) and
Vanadium (V2O5)
• Formation Pyrosulfates of Sodium and
Vanadium
• Release of Sulphur and Chloride
compound by unburnt coal particles due
to incomplete combustion

67
18-03-2019

Damage Mechanisms Contributed by


Water Quality

What makes Boiler Water Chemistry


Critical for the O&M Engineers?

68
18-03-2019

10Ca2+ + 6PO
$ßĦ¥ŦŲΏλ 3– + 2OH– →
+ σπςЊμ→
4 βζρЛξ
[Ca3(PO4)2]3·Ca(OH)2

Water Flow diagram in Boiler

69
18-03-2019

Power Boiler Flow Diagram

HP IP / LP

GEN

CRH
HRH SH-1 SH-2
comer
Down

Deaerator

Economizer

HP Heater

LP Heater

Condenser
Boiler Feed Pump

APH
PA / FD Fan Cond. Extraction Pump

FROM FUEL HANDLING SYSTEM

ID Fan

ESP

Water Analysis:
What do we check in the Feed Water, Boiler Water & Steam?

Analysis Feed Water Boiler Water Steam Cond.

pH √ √ √ √

Conductivity √ √ √ √

Silica √ √ √ √

Residual √
Hydrazine
Residual √
Phosphate
P Alkalinity √

M Alkalinity √

Chloride √

Iron & Copper √

Residual √
Ammonia

70
18-03-2019

What are the consequences of faulty


Water Chemistry in Boiler?

Scale

Corrosion

Carry Over

71
18-03-2019

Scale and Corrosion :

Carry Over :

72
18-03-2019

Carry Over :

Impurities in Water

73
18-03-2019

Source of Water:

Surface Water - River, Canal, Reservoir, etc.

Ground Water

Sea Water

Water has been called a


universal solvent

74
18-03-2019

IMPURITIES

The natural surface water picks up:

• Minerals and salts from the earthen layer –


dissolved condition

• Organic and inorganic impurities

• Decayed vegetation and marine lives


• Coarse and un-dissolvable substances in suspended
form, mainly silt and clay matters - turbidity

• Siliceous matters, in dissolved as well as in


colloidal forms

• Various gases, mainly Oxygen, and others like


Carbon dioxide etc.

SOLID IMPURITIES:

Suspended (> 1 micron) Increases Turbidity

Dissolved (< 0.001 micron) Increases Conductivity

Colloidal (< 0.5 micron)

75
18-03-2019

Dissolved Solids:

Ionization of dissolved NaCl → Na+ + Cl-

Suspended (> 1 micron) Non Reactive

Dissolved (< 0.001 micron) Reactive

Colloidal (< 0.5 micron) Non Reactive

76
18-03-2019

Dissolved Ions in Natural Water:


Mainly mineral salts

CATION (Basic Radical) ANION (Acidic Radical)


Ca++ (Calcium) HCO3– (Bicarbonate)
Mg++ (Magnesium) CO3– – (Carbonate)
Na+ (Sodium) SO4– – (Sulphate)
Cl – (Chloride)
NO3– (Nitrate)
PO4– – – (Phosphate)
HSiO3– (Bisilicate)

Scale Formation

t2 = t4 + (1/α + D/ k2) x Q
Where,
t2 = inner skin temperature of tube (°C)
t4 = boiler water temperature (bulk) (°C)
α = heat transfer coefficient of boiling surface
(kcal/ m2·h·°C)
D = scale thickness (m)
k2 = thermal conductivity of scale (kcal/ m·h·°C)
Q = heat flux (kcal/m2·h)

77
18-03-2019

Thermal Conductivity of various scales

Substance Thermal conductivity


(kcal/m2·h·°C)
Silica scale 0.2–0.4
Calcium carbonate scale 0.4–0.6
Calcium sulfate scale 0.5–2.0
Calcium phosphate scale 0.5–0.7
Iron oxide (hematite) 3–5
scale
Iron oxide (magnetite) 1
scale
Carbon steel 40–60

Most deposits can be classified as one of two types

 scale that crystallized directly onto tube surfaces


 sludge deposits that precipitated elsewhere and were
transported to the metal surface by the flowing water

78
18-03-2019

What is Hard Water?

Dissolved Ions in Natural Water:

CATION (Basic Radical) ANION (Acidic Radical)


Ca++ (Calcium) HCO3– (Bicarbonate)
Mg++ (Magnesium) CO3– – (Carbonate)
Na+ (Sodium) SO4– – (Sulphate)
Cl – (Chloride)
NO3– (Nitrate)
PO4– – – (Phosphate)
HSiO3– (Bisilicate)

79
18-03-2019

Scale formation is a function of two


criteria

1. The concentration and solubility limits of the


dissolved salt

2. The retrograde solubility (inversely


proportional to temperature) characteristic
of some salts

The principal scaling and fouling ions are:


Calcium, Magnesium, Iron and bicarbonate and
carbonate
Silica

Carry Over

A. Chemical Carry Over

B. Mechanical Carry Over

80
18-03-2019

mass dissolved in steam


Distribution Ratio (DR) =
mass dissolved in water

ms

mw

DR α P

For most solids, P >> 221 bar; DR >> 1

But not for silica

Factors that make Managing Silica difficult


Above 28 kg/ cm2 pressure, silica DR starts increasing
almost logarithmically
Silica DR starts decreasing above 9 pH

Boiler Water pH > 9.2

81
18-03-2019

Factors that make Managing Silica difficult


In the turbine, the solubility sharply decreases after around
15 kg/ cm2 pressure

The need of Managing Silica

Forms hard glassy deposit on turbine blade

Decrease Enthalpy drop across stages

Increase specific steam consumption

May lead to imbalance and vibration


sometimes

82
18-03-2019

Factors that make Managing Silica difficult

Dissolved Silica is weakly ionized

Silica sometimes enter in colloidal state, particularly


during high run off condition

Colloidal Silica can not be detected by Molybdate


reaction test

Colloidal Silica becomes reactive silica at high


temperature in the drum

Factors that make Managing Silica difficult

Super heater

MS

Economizer
BW

FW

Colloidal Silica in the system

83
18-03-2019

Pre-treatment
Clariflocculator:

The ―precipitator‖ operates on the ―sludge blanket‖


principle

Managing Silica

ms Silica < 0.01 - 0.02 ppm


MS
mw

Boiler Water pH – 9.2 to 9.8


BW
Silica < 0.5 ppm

FW

84
18-03-2019

Managing Silica

SiO22 in steam in ppm SiO2 in boiler (mg/L)

Pressure in bar

Managing Silica

ms Silica < 0.01 ppm


MS
mw

Boiler Water pH – 9.2 to 9.6


BW
Silica < 0.3 ppm

FW

Silica < 0.01 ppm

85
18-03-2019

Managing Silica
Silica Control:

Clariflocculator

Strong Based Anion

Mix Bed

Ultra Filtration

Reverse Osmosis

Drum Separator

Unwanted intrusion

B. Mechanical Carry Over:

Factors related to Operating control,


causing Priming:
Operation at the high water level

Rapid fluctuation of heat load

Failure of flow control

Factors related to the mechanical structure


of boiler:

Inadequate, or, poor condition of the water


and steam separator

86
18-03-2019

Checking of Drum Separators to avoid


mechanical carry over

Corrosion
Low pH Oxygen corrosion

High pH Caustic corrosion (Gouging)

Low pH Acid Chloride corrosion

Low pH Acid Phosphate corrosion

Combined Stress & Corrosion


Hydrogen Cracking (Embrittlement)

Caustic Cracking (Embrittlement)

Flow Accelerated Corrosion (FAC)

87
18-03-2019

Low pH Oxygen corrosion

The degree of oxygen attack depends on

• The concentration of dissolved oxygen

• The pH and
• The temperature of the water

Corrosion
Oxidation of Fe in Boiler water:

Fe + ½O2 + H2O  Fe(OH)2

4Fe2 + 3O2 + 6H2O → 2Fe2O3 6H2O

3Fe + 4H2O = Fe3O4 + 4H2

Magnetite

88
18-03-2019

Corrosion

Boiler internals with stable magnetite Without stable magnetite layer


layer

With Phosphate-Hydrazine, and AVT (R)

Corrosion

Courtesy…..TAQA Neyveli Power Company Pvt.Ltd.,

FeOOH (Ferric Oxide Hydrate) with AVT (O), and OT

89
18-03-2019

Formation of Magnetite:
N2H4 + 6Fe2O3 → 4Fe3O4 + N2 + 2H2O

8.75
8.9
9.0
9.2

9.4
9.6

Deaeration:
Dissolved oxygen is
removed by thermo-
mechanical action.
Temperature is raised with
steam to lower the
solubility of gas and trays
are used to atomize the
water
Oxygen removal up to
0.007 ppm

90
18-03-2019

Solubility of Oxygen depends on :

Temperature
…… 0 solubility at saturation temperature

Partial pressure of Oxygen on water surface

PT LT TE

181

LOW pH CORROSION AND OXYGEN PITTINGS

91
18-03-2019

Galvanic Corrosion:

Anode:
Fe  Fe2+ + 2e¯

Cathode:
½O2 + H2O + 2e¯  2OH¯

Overall:
Fe + ½O2 + H2O  Fe(OH)2

Galvanic Corrosion:
It occurs when a metal or alloy is
electrically coupled to a different metal or
alloy while being immersed in an
electrolyte

Anything that results in a difference in


electrical potential at discrete surface
locations can cause a galvanic reaction,
such as:
 scratches in a metal surface
 differential stresses in a metal
 differences in temperature
 conductive deposits

92
18-03-2019

Galvanic Corrosion:

Effect of Temperature:

Influence of temperature on carbon steel


corrosion in water including dissolved oxygen

In a closed system like boiler feed water degree of


corrosion is directly proportional to temperature

93
18-03-2019

Effect of pH:
Anode:
2Fe (solid) → 2Fe2+ (aq) + 4e-

Cathode:
O2 (gas) + 4H+ (aq) + 4e- → 2H2O
(liquid)

Further oxidation of
Fe2+(aq) ions at Anode:
4Fe2+(aq) + 3O2 (gas) + 6H2O
(liquid) → 2Fe2O3 .6H2O (solid)

The H+ (aq) are available, when the medium is


acidic. Therefore low pH increases the rate of corrosion.

pH
The pH indicates the concentration of hydrogen ion in an
aqueous solution and is used as an index showing the
acidity or alkalinity of water.

Water only slightly dissociates into hydrogen ion (H+) and


hydroxide ion (OH–); H2O → H+ + OH–

The ion product of water is a constant and it is 1 X 10–14 at


25°C; [H+] x [OH–] = 1 X 10–14

The pH is calculated from the H+ concentration by using the


equation; pH = log 1/[H+] = - log [H+]

In case of pH 7, [H+] and [OH–] are equal at 1 X 10–7 and


this water is said to be neutral.

94
18-03-2019

Effect of pH:
The corrosion rate of carbon steel at high
temperature is minimized in the pH range of 11
to 12 as shown in Figure below.

Caustic Corrosion (Gouging ):

Typical gouging caused by caustic attack developed under


an original adherent deposit. Note irregular depressions
and white (Na2CO3) deposits remaining around edges of
original deposit area.

95
18-03-2019

Caustic Corrosion (Gouging ):

Caustic corrosion (gouging) occurs when


caustic is concentrated and dissolves the
protective magnetite (Fe3O4 ) layer.

Na3PO4 + H2O  Na2HPO4 + NaOH

4NaOH + Fe3O4 → Na2FeO2 + 2NaFeO2 + 2H2O

2NaOH + Fe → Na2FeO2 +2H

UNDER DEPOSIT BOILING

Water and Steam

Porous Oxide

Protective
Protective Oxide Oxide
Fe3O4

Tube metal wall

Wick Boiling

96
18-03-2019

Caustic Corrosion (Gouging ):

Na3PO4 + H2O ↔ Na2HPO4 + NaOH

Case study:
30 MW BFB Boiler
Location: Bed Coil Tubes
Size & Spec : Ø 51 x 6.35 mm & SA 210
Gr.A1
Bed Temperature: 905°C
Service: less than 1 year

97
18-03-2019

Tube Location

Bed Coil Tube

BFB Boiler

Failed Tube

Failed Bed Coil Tube

98
18-03-2019

Failed Tube

Damage at 12 O Clock position

Failed Tube

Deposits near damage

99
18-03-2019

During discussion, it was noted :

all three boilers are operated at nearly 25% over


loading conditions
Charcoal is used as start up fuel
Recently drum level maintained at 8 – 12% lower
than normal level to avoid mechanical carry over
(which was observed taking place)
Residual Phosphate was also maintained at 2-3 ppm
instead of 6-8 ppm as required for the same reason
Fuel Distribution plates were found in damaged
condition.

Acid Phosphate Corrosion:

Thick corrosion product and deposit layers covering


crater at location of phosphate corrosion damage

100
18-03-2019

Acid Phosphate Corrosion:

Mutually intersecting, undercut, rounded pits formed


within a narrow zone where phosphate corrosion occurred

Acid Phosphate Corrosion:

Critical Factors:

Low sodium-to-phosphate molar ratios in


the boiler water
Increased salt concentration mechanism like

Wick boiling in porous metal oxide deposits

Steam water stratification (steam blanketing)

Phosphate hideout

101
18-03-2019

Acid Phosphate Corrosion:

Acid Phosphate reaction mechanism:

2Na2HPO4 + Fe3O4 → NaFePO4 + Na3PO4 + Fe2O3


+ H2 O

2Na2HPO4 + Fe + ½ O2 → NaFePO4 + Na3PO4


+ H2O

3NaH2PO4 + Fe3O4 → 3NaFePO4 + ½ O2 + H2O

The presence of maricite (NaFePO4) and/or


iron phosphate on a corroded surface is
strong evidence that phosphate corrosion
has occurred

Acid Phosphate Corrosion:

Energy-dispersive spectroscopy using the SEM


would reveal approximately equivalent
concentrations of sodium, iron, and
phosphorus, which would confirm that the
crystalline material is indeed maricite.

102
18-03-2019

Acid Attack:

This results in a visually irregular surface appearance,


as shown in Figure. Smooth surfaces appear at areas of
flow where the attack has been intensified.

ACID CHLORIDE CORROSION

MgCl2 + H2O → MgO + 2HCl

Fe3O4 +HCl → FeCl2 + FeCl +H2O

Fe + 2HCl → FeCl2 + H2

103
18-03-2019

Stress Corrosion

HYDROGEN DAMAGE (EMBRITTLEMENT)

Thick Lip Brittle Appearance

Violent rupture Hydrogen Damage

104
18-03-2019

HYDROGEN DAMAGE (EMBRITTLEMENT)

Mechanism:

4NaOH + Fe3O4 → 2NaFeO2 + Na2FeO2 + 2H2O


Fe + 2NaOH → Na2FeO2 + 2H
4H+ + Fe3C → CH4 + 3Fe

MgCl2 + H2O  MgO + 2HCl


Fe3O4 +HCl  FeCl2 + FeCl +H2O
Fe + 2HCl  FeCl2 + 2H
4H+ + Fe3C → CH4 + 3Fe

HYDROGEN DAMAGE (EMBRITTLEMENT)

Decarburization weakens tube


Gas generated collects in grain boundaries
and form fissures as pressure builds up
which eventually grow

Failure occurs when the ruptured section can no longer


withstand the internal pressure. Ruptures are violent and
sudden, and can be disastrous

105
18-03-2019

Case Study:
120 MW Oil Fired Boiler
Location: Goose Neck Rear Water Wall
Size : Ø 76.1 x 5.5 mm
Specification: SA210 GR A1
Working Temp. & Pressure: 350°C & 90
kg/cm²
Service: 250000 Hrs

The middle tube has burst opened with thick


lips

106
18-03-2019

Dimensional Measurement (mm):


Tube location Outside Diameter Thickness
0°-180° 90°-270° 0° 90° 180° 270˚

Near failed lip - - 4.08 - 6.12 -


Ring section 74.15 78.73 3.97 5.60 5.78 5.67

Flattening Test: Test Method ASTM A370


A flattening specimen was taken near the
failed region. The flattening test showed
cracks on ID surface, indicative of hydrogen
embrittlement.

The middle tube was transverse sectioned


and micro examined at the failed region. The
failed lip shows a lot of oxide filled
discontinuous cracks starting from ID
surface

Decarburization is observed near the crack


edges throughout this region.

107
18-03-2019

• Opposite
On a ring to the failed
section region, the
a littleaway from the failed
microstructure
region, a similarconsists
structureof is
polygonal
observedgrains
of ferrite and pearlite

Conclusion:
Several oxide filled discontinuous cracks are
observed on the ID surface of the tube. The
flattening test result indicates hydrogen
embrittlement.

The failure of the tube is attributed to


hydrogen embrittlement.

108
18-03-2019

Caustic Stress Crack

REASON
For caustic embrittlement to occur, three
conditions must exist:
 The boiler metal must have a high level of
stress
 A mechanism for the concentration of
boiler water must be present
 The boiler water must have embrittlement-
producing characteristics

Caustic Stress Crack


Fine cracks adjacent
and parallel to the weld
joint can be seen on a
Super heater tube.
Surface branching of
the crack is apparent

109
18-03-2019

Caustic Stress Crack


Micro-structural examinations may
reveal branched cracks running
across the grains (trans-granular)
and originating on the internal
surface. The cracks are located in
the heat-affected zone immediately
adjacent to the weld.

Case study:
Heat Recovery Steam (HRSG)
Location: Super heater inlet header
Size & Spec : 2-in. (5.1-cm) outer diameter;
T22 and T91 low-alloy steels weld joint
Drum Pressure: 60 bar
Service: less than 1 year

110
18-03-2019

A thick-walled, circumferential fracture occurred


along a circumferential weld joining sections of T22
and T91 low-alloy steel tubing

The fracture edges were generally covered


with a thin oxide layer that was overlaid in
places by powdery white deposits that
produced an alkaline solution when mixed
with distilled water

SEM-EDS analysis of material on the fracture


edge indicated the presence of sodium,
silicon, and calcium

Micro-hardness measurements indicated a


large increase in hardness within the weld
and surrounding heat-affected zone (HAZ),
relative to locations away from the weld

111
18-03-2019

Microscopic examinations revealed that tight, highly


branched, inter-granular cracks originated from the
internal surface within the fusion zone of the
circumferential weld

Conclusion:
The cracks were possibly caused by caustic
stress corrosion cracking due to boiler water
carryover.

Residual stresses from welding most likely


contributed significantly to the formation of
stress corrosion cracks.
Applied bending stresses due to thermal
expansion and contraction may have also
contributed since it was near a dissimilar
weld joint

112
18-03-2019

CAUSTIC EMBRITTLEMENT

REMEDIAL ACTION

 Proper stress relieving of all welded or


rolled section
 Application of a coordinated pH/phosphate
control

Damage Mechanism: Flow Accelerated


Corrosion

HP Economizer drain Feed Pipe


tube

Feed Pipe

113
18-03-2019

Damage Mechanism: Flow Accelerated


Corrosion

Flow-accelerated corrosion (FAC) is a well-


known damage mechanism that affects carbon
steel components carrying water or two-phase
flow. Caused by the mechanically-assisted
chemical dissolution of the protective oxide and
base metal.

Damage Mechanism: Flow Accelerated


Corrosion
It has lead to failures or severe wall thinning
in:
Economizer/preheater tubes at inlet headers.
Economizer/preheater tube bends in regions where
steaming occurs.
Vertical LP evaporator tubes on Horizontal HRSGs,
especially in the bends near the outlet headers
LP evaporator inlet headers which have a tortuous fluid
entry path and where orifices are installed.
LP riser tubes/pipes to the LP drum.
LP evaporator transition headers.
Feed Water Line.

114
18-03-2019

Damage Mechanism: Flow Accelerated


Corrosion
FAC is a mass-transfer process in which the
protective oxide (mostly magnetite) is removed
from the steel surface by flowing water.
Material wear rate depends on
(1) Steel composition, temperature, flow
velocity and turbulence,
(2) Water and water-droplet pH, and
(3) The concentrations of both oxygen and
oxygen scavenger.

FLOW ASSISTED CORROSION


FAC affectedthinning
 Localized by:
Temperature
 Dissolution of protective
oxide and base metal
 pH
 Occurs in single or two
 O2 concentration
phase water
 Mass flow rate
 Low pressure system bends
Geometry
 in evaporators,
 Quality of fluid
Risers and economizer
tubes
 Alloys of construction
 Feed water cycle

115
18-03-2019

FLOW ASSISTED CORROSION


Effect of temperature on normalized
wear rate of various metallurgies

Greatest potential for FAC occurs around 150 ºC

FLOW ASSISTED CORROSION


pH has significant effect on normalized
wear rate of carbon steel

Nearly forty (40) fold reduction between


pH 8.6 and 9.4

116
18-03-2019

FLOW ASSISTED CORROSION


Dissolved oxygen has direct impact

 FAC minimized above 30 ppb O2


 FAC increases exponentially below 30 ppb O2

FLOW ASSISTED CORROSION


Effect of Velocity

 Normalized wear rate minimal below 10 ft/sec


 Rate increases by 2.8 times at 100 ft/sec

117
18-03-2019

FLOW ASSISTED CORROSION


Location

Geometry affects location of FAC, regardless of


Reynold’s Number

Formation of Magnetite:
When carbon steel is exposed to oxygen-free
water, the following reaction occurs:
Fe + 2H2O ⇒ Fe2+ + 2OH- +H2 ⇔ Fe(OH)2 + H2 (1)

This reaction is then followed by the Schikorr


reaction where precipitated ferrous hydroxide is
converted into magnetite:
3Fe(OH)2 ⇒ Fe3O4 + 2H2O + H2 (2)

118
18-03-2019

Dissolution of Magnetite

Damage Mechanism: Flow Accelerated


Corrosion
Precaution:
For HRSG and fossil fired boiler plants with
all-ferrous feedwater systems the feedwater
chemistry should be AVT(O) to avoid single-
phase FAC in the feedwater and LP
evaporator circuit.

The basic idea of AVT is to minimize corrosion


and FAC by using deaerated high purity water
with elevated pH. The pH elevation should be
achieved by the addition of ammonia.

119
18-03-2019

Effect of Temperature and Ammonia on


iron dissolution

Effect of pH on FAC

120
18-03-2019

Damage Mechanism: Flow Accelerated


Corrosion
Precaution:
Turbulences should be minimized by proper
design

For new replacement and for new units


material of construction may be changed to
P11 or P22

Regular inspection of susceptible components


by ultrasonic (UT) examination needs to be
undertaken to prevent any catastrophic
failure

Damage Mechanism: Flow Accelerated


Corrosion
Precaution:
For the carbon steel materials operating
under reducing feedwater chemistry the
oxide formed is Fe3O4 (magnetite) and its
solubility is strongly influenced by the
reducing conditions.

This constitutes the highest probability for


FAC in a fossil plant with highest solubility
being around 1500C.

121
18-03-2019

Damage Mechanism: Flow Accelerated


Corrosion
Precaution:
Changing the feedwater to an oxidizing
treatment by eliminating the reducing agent
and/or adding oxygen will result in the
formation of FeOOH (ferric oxide hydrate).
This reduces the solubility of the surface
oxide by at least two orders of magnitude in
the temperature range up to about 3000C.

Reliability Issues of HRSG

122
18-03-2019

Common damage mechanisms:

Low Cycle Thermo-mechanical Fatigue

Flow Accelerated Corrosion

Cold end gas-side corrosion

123
18-03-2019

Some Techno-Commercial issues


affecting HRSG Reliabilities

The two paramount concerns of most purchasers of


CCGT installations are low installed cost and high
fuel efficiency

High efficiency has driven rapid increases in GT


exhaust flow and temperature imposed on HRSGs
GE CCGT Model Exhaust Temperature Gas Flow
(oC) (TPH)
5371 (PA) 485 446

7121 (EA) 536 1070

9171 (E) 543 1484

9351 (FA) 608 2318

Some Techno-Commercial issues


affecting HRSG Reliabilities

The two paramount concerns of most purchasers of


CCGT installations are low installed cost and high
fuel efficiency

High efficiency has driven rapid increases in GT


exhaust flow and temperature imposed on HRSGs

Compared to highly rated large GTs, HRSGs are


perceived as low-risk equipment

Low-cost HRSG designs which just meet the


requirements of specifications and boiler design code

124
18-03-2019

Some Techno-Commercial issues


affecting HRSG Reliabilities
Horizontal HRSGs are constructed with tubes arranged
vertically in ―harps.‖

These harps are rigid structures requiring that adjacent


tubes remain at similar temperatures to avoid severe
thermal-mechanical fatigue damage and premature
failure.
HRSGs operating at high pressure are having
sufficiently thick walled drum superheater and
sometimes reheater outlet headers that require careful
management of heat up and cool down rates to avoid
internal cracking
Since combustion turbine ramp rates directly affect
HRSG component temperature ramp rates, the push to
rapid CT start ups results in greater ramp rates in HRSG
hot section components

Damage Mechanism: Thermo-mechanical


Low Cycle Fatigue

125
18-03-2019

Damage Mechanism: Thermo-mechanical


Low Cycle Fatigue

Location:
HP Superheater and outlet manifold
HP Steam Drum and Evaporator circuit
Economizer

Damage Mechanism: Thermo-mechanical


Low Cycle Fatigue
HP Superheater and outlet manifold
Reasons:
Rapid increase in GT Exhaust temperature
during starts from any condition
Header thickness
Header to tube connection geometry
Quench cooling due to improper
condensate drain
Over spraying of attemperator/ faulty
attemperation spray

126
18-03-2019

Differential expansion amplifies drain lateral


displacement

Bowing in panel tube

Watch for bend tubes and deflection of


superheater floor pipe penetrations during
startup and shutdown

Damage Mechanism: Thermo-mechanical


Low Cycle Fatigue
HP Superheater and outlet manifold

127
18-03-2019

Damage Mechanism: Thermo-mechanical


Low Cycle Fatigue
HP Superheater and outlet manifold
Precaution:
Care to be taken both for ramp up and
coasting down rate
ETM to be used for 9FA machines

Damage Mechanism: Thermo-mechanical


Low Cycle Fatigue
HP Superheater and outlet manifold
Precaution:

Hold the GT load at a nominal block


load until steam flow is established in
the superheater

control the GT loading rate to ensure that the


temperature difference between the steam
temperature and the average header wall
temperature remains at or below the initial
difference on first admission of steam

128
18-03-2019

Damage Mechanism: Thermo-mechanical


Low Cycle Fatigue
HP Superheater and outlet manifold
Precaution:

Unloading the GT (and using ETM on


7FA/9FAs) until outlet steam temperature is
about 50oC above the prevailing HP saturation
temperature, then holding at that load for few
minutes to let the header‘s through-wall
temperature gradient equalize before shutting
down the GT

Damage Mechanism: Thermo-mechanical


Low Cycle Fatigue
HP Superheater and outlet manifold
Condensate quenching precaution:

Low-point drains are open during startup to


purge water/condensate prior to admitting
steam to tube panels

Drains are open sufficiently early in the


startup process to ensure that all condensate
actually will be drained prior to steam
admission

129
18-03-2019

Damage Mechanism: Thermo-mechanical


Low Cycle Fatigue
HP Superheater and outlet manifold
Condensate quenching precaution:

Proper sizing of drains is critical

Locate blowdown tanks below header drain


locations

check to see that HP, IP, and LP drains are


not combined in a common collection pipe
upstream of the blowdown tank.

Damage Mechanism: Thermo-mechanical


Low Cycle Fatigue
HP Superheater and outlet manifold
Over spraying of attemperation; reasons:

Typical causes include leaking spray-water


supply valves, hunting, poor piping
arrangements, overspray, and a
primary/secondary superheater surface
arrangement that is incompatible with a given
turbine‘s performance at startup or low load.

130
18-03-2019

Damage Mechanism: Thermo-mechanical


Low Cycle Fatigue
HP Superheater and outlet manifold
Over spraying of attemperation; reasons:

Poor atomization of spray water because of


probe/nozzle damage or partial plugging
Improper piping design—in particular an
insufficient straight run of pipe upstream
and/or downstream of the attemperator
An arrangement of superheater surface that
allows overspray to occur at startup or low
load, because all the water cannot be
evaporated.

Damage Mechanism: Thermo-mechanical


Low Cycle Fatigue
HP Superheater and outlet manifold
Over spraying of attemperation; Precautions:

first things to investigate is spray valve


behaviour at steady load
Check thermocouple reading upstream and
downstream when spray valve is closed
prevent spray down below 30oC of superheat
at the attemperator outlet
If too much surface is installed, remove fins
and/or gas baffles, or use tube shields, to
reduce heat transfer

131
18-03-2019

Damage Mechanism: Thermo-mechanical


Low Cycle Fatigue
Economizer:
reasons:

In panel-type economizers, water goes up


and down in each panel, or harp
Return-bend economizers usually have
alternating upflow and downflow tubes in the
same row. In some cases, water flows up one
row, down the next—a serpentine arrangement
a temperature differential between tube rows
of from 30 to 100 deg F can cause thermal
shock, which contributes to fatigue failure

Damage Mechanism: Thermo-mechanical


Low Cycle Fatigue
Economizer:

Economizer tube leak at weld caused by thermal shock

132
18-03-2019

Damage Mechanism: Thermo-mechanical


Low Cycle Fatigue
Economizer:
reasons:

During startup, operators expect drum level to


swell and the feedwater control valve is closed;
no water is flowing through the boiler. During
this time, economizer panels ―soak‖ to
temperatures higher than normal.

When HP drum level finally starts to drop, the


feedwater control valve opens and ―cold‖ water
―shocks‖ the economizer.

Damage Mechanism: Thermo-mechanical


Low Cycle Fatigue
Economizer:
Precautions:

Trickle-feed water through the HP economizer


as soon as drum pressure begins to increase
Assure positive feedwater flow thoughout the
startup period
blow down as needed to control drum level

133
18-03-2019

Failures Case Studies

Case 1:
120 MW Oil Fired Boiler
Location: Primary SH Coil
Size : Ø 57.15 x 4.2 mm
Working Temp. & Pressure: 510°C & 85
kg/cm²
Service: 243000 Hrs

134
18-03-2019

The tube shows bulging (OD=61.5 mm) and burst


opened like a fish mouth

Dimensional Measurement (mm):


Tube location Outside Diameter Thickness
0°-180° 90°-270° 0° 90° 180°
270˚
Near failed lip -- -- 3.03 -- 4.27 --
Ring section 59.21 61.81 3.35 3.68 3.93 3.82
little away

Burst section is having thick lip

135
18-03-2019

Transverse section of the burst lip reveals


oxidation of the edges.
Several oxides filled rounded pits are
observed on the edges of the lip as wells on
the ID surface of the tube.
No significant deformation / decarburisation
of the adjoining grains of the pit edges are
observed.
The microstructure consists of polygonal
grains of ferrite and pearlite.

Opposite to the burst and a ring section little


away from the burst also show similar type
of microstructure. Oxides filled pits are
observed in both the sections examined.

136
18-03-2019

Conclusion:
Micro examination indicates several rounded
pits filled with oxides on the ID surface of
the tube.

The failure is attributed to waterside


corrosion.

However, take the case of a similar failure


in the same Boiler

Tube shows bulging (OD= 83.5 mm) and burst


opened with thin lips. No significant amount of
deposits is observed on ID and OD surface.

137
18-03-2019

Some rounded pits filled with oxides are


observed on the ID surface tube in all the
three sections examined.

138
18-03-2019

Transverse section of the burst lip shows oxidation of


the edges and the structure consists of bainite.

Opposite to the burst the structure shows polygonal


grains of ferrite and pearlite.

A ring section little away from the burst shows


transformed ferrite and pearlite along the axis of
burst and polygonal grains of ferrite and pearlite,
opposite to the burst axis.

Above observations suggests that the tube has been


overheated to above AC3 temperature for the steel
for a short period of time.

139
18-03-2019

Case 2:
120 MW Oil Fired Boiler
Location: LHS Water Wall
Size : Ø 76.1 x 5.5 mm
Specification: SA210 GR A1
Working Temp. & Pressure: 350°C & 90
kg/cm²
Service: 254378 Hrs

The tube shows blisters at four locations (OD = 80


to 82 mm) in the spool piece between two weld
joints.

140
18-03-2019

A circumferential crack is observed near the fusion


line of one of the butt joint. Heavy deposits are
observed on the ID surface of the tube.

Wall thickness at 0o was measured as 1.5


mm
Micro examination of Transverse sections of
the tube at two out of four blisters reveal
oxides on the blister edges and ID surface of
the tube

141
18-03-2019

Oxides filled rounded pits are observed on


the ID surface.
Copper coloured copper rich phase
segregation is observed near the blister
edges and ID surface

No significant deformation / decarburisation


of the adjoining grains of the pit edges and
blister edges are observed.
The microstructure consists of polygonal
grains of ferrite and pearlite

142
18-03-2019

Transverse section of the weld joint where


the circumferential crack was observed
reveals segregation of copper rich phase
near the ID surface.
Several discontinuous grain boundary cracks
with decarburisation of the adjoining grains,
typical of Hydrogen embrittlement cracks are
observed in the spool piece PM, HAZ and
weld metal of the butt joint

One more transverse section of the weld


joint at about 180° from the circumferential
crack was also micro examined. Mismatch
between the tube members, lack of sidewall
fusion, incomplete root penetration and slag
are observed

143
18-03-2019

Conclusion:
Micro examination reveals presence of
copper coloured copper rich phase on the ID
surface and blister edges of the tube. Also
damage due to Hydrogen embrittlement is
observed in the PM, weld and HAZ regions of
the weld joint.
The blisters observed on the OD surface is
attributed to waterside corrosion may be
due to condenser leakage.
The circumferential crack observed near the
fusion line of the butt joint is attributed
Hydrogen embrittlement caused by
waterside corrosion.
Swab analysis shows presence of some
chloride and sulphur with a pH value of 7.8.

144

You might also like