APPENDIX-I

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Rubrics for Final Year Thesis/Project Evaluation

Criteria/ 1- 2 – Acceptable 3 - Adequate 4 - Proficient CO/POs KP WP EA

Rubrics (Ri) Unacceptable
R1 Student has no Partial Student has competent Full understanding of the (CO-1) 1-4 1-7 1-5
Project knowledge of understanding of knowledge and can overall thesis/project PO-1
Knowledge problem and the overall reply to the queries but problem statement, goals and PO-2
solution. thesis/project without justification. complexity with a clear
problem statement, workout plan, design
goals and deliverables and feasibility
complexity with an report to proceed further.
approximate plan
and minor design
deliverables to
proceed further.
R2 Student is Student has not Student has clearly All key points covered in (CO-6)
Organization clueless about employed graphs, organized presentation presentation and student has PO-10
and Content of the content of figures, charts to content and used few presented with clear and
Presentation presentation explain salient figures and graphs logical flow.
points
R3 Student is Student knows but Student gives Student provides sufficient (CO-4) 7
Societal clueless about is unable to justify reasonable justification details about how this PO-7
Impact societal impact societal impact of of societal impact of thesis/project will impact the PO-8
thesis/project thesis/project Society.
R4 Literature Literature review The review gives good Literature review is (CO-2)
Literature review is absent contains reasonable background knowledge excellently written according PO-3 8
Review or in vague form description of of the thesis/project but to the scientific writing PO-4
thesis/project it is not written in standards and covers
background but scientific writing maximum of research
more research standard material
references are
required
R5 The approach The methods, The methods, design, The methods, design, (CO-2) 5

21
Methodology that will be design, algorithm algorithm and other algorithms and other aspects (CO-3) 6
and design taken to solve and other aspects aspects are discussed are sufficiently discussed with PO-3
the problem is are discussed but sufficiently. details and figures. Work PO-4
not discussed not convincingly. division between group
Much is left to member s is defined
reader’s
imagination
R6 Student has not Student has Student has adequately Student has employed tools to (CO-3) 6
Tools and used existing marginally exploited used modern tools to their capacity and is well PO-5
Technologies engineering the capabilities of complete thesis/project informed of modern tool PO-5
tools the tools used to but lacks other usage.
create alternatives that could
thesis/project have been used
R7 Student is Student is unable to Student justifies Student provides clear (CO-3) 5
Green clueless about justify the efficient resource environmental and (CO-4) 7
Computing the environmental utilization and its sustainability goals and how PO-7
environmental impact of the impact on environment they are achieved.
impact of the thesis/project and
thesis/project its sustainability
goals
R8 The Student has cited Student has cited Properly acknowledged and (CO-4) 7
Ethics thesis/project others work but it is existing work but it is ethically used existing PO-8
contents are not related to the not consistent. work/material
plagiarized thesis/project
R9 Working Work division is Work division is clearly Work division is shown and (CO-5)
Work Division division among shown but more shown each member is equally given PO-9
& Management group members clarity is needed responsibilities PO-11
is not shown

R10 Lifelong Student has Student has poorly Student is satisfactorily Student has shown keen (CO-6)
Learning poor engaging in engaged in life-long interest in independently PO-12
preparation to independent learning in the broader engaging in lifelong learning.
engage in learning context of technological
independent & change/managerial/co
lifelong learning mmunity activities.

22
 Marks Distribution for 7th Semester (100 Marks)
Internal
Chairman Supervisor Total
Expert
25 25 50 100

Rubrics for Final Year Thesis/Project Evaluation (7th Semester Pre-Defense)

Rubrics (Ri) Marks Obtained Unacceptable Acceptable Adequate Proficient

R1 5 0 3 4 5
Project Knowledge
R2 4 0 2 3 4
Organization and Content of
Presentation
R3 4 0 2 3 4
Societal Impact
R4 3 0 1 2 3
Literature Review
R5 3 0 1 2 3
Methodology and design
R6 3 0 1 2 3
Tools and Technologies
R7 3 0 1 2 3
Green Computing
R8
Ethics
R9
Work Division & Management

R10
Lifelong Learning
Total 25

23
 Marks Distribution for 8th Semester (100 Marks)

External
Chairman Supervisor Total
Expert
25 25 50 100
Rubrics for Final Year Thesis/Project Evaluation (8th Semester Final Defense)

Rubrics (Ri) Marks Unacceptable Acceptable Adequate Proficient

Obtained
R1 Project Knowledge 5 0 3 4 5
R2 Organization and Content of 4 0 2 3 4
Presentation
R3 Societal Impact 4 0 2 3 4
R4 Literature Review 3 0 1 2 3
R5 Methodology and design 3 0 1 2 3
R6 Tools and Technologies 3 0 1 2 3
R7 Green Computing 3 0 1 2 3
R8 Ethics
R9 Work Division &
Management
R10 Lifelong Learning
Total 25

24
 Final Year Thesis/Project Evaluation (7th Semester Pre-Defense)

Thesis/Project Title: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Student Name :_________________________________________________________________________________ Student ID: ______________________________________________

Rubrics (Ri) PO Evaluation Marks

Unacceptable Acceptable Adequate Proficient Total Obtained
R1 Project/Thesis PO 1: Engineering Knowledge □ □ □ □ 5
Knowledge (CO-1)
PO 2: Problem Analysis (CO-1)

R2 Organization and PO 10: Communication (CO-6) □ □ □ □ 4

Content of Presentation
and publications/poster.
R4 Literature Review
R5 Methodology and
design
R6 Tools and
Technologies
R8 The Engineer and
Society, Environment and
Sustainability and Ethics
R9 Individual/Team
efforts
PO 12: Life Long Learning (CO-6)
PO 3: Problem Analysis (CO-2) □ □ □ □ 4
PO 4: Investigation (CO-2)
PO 4: Investigation (CO-2) □ □ □ □ 3
PO 5: Modern Tool Usage (CO-3) □ □ □ □ 3
PO 6: The Engineer and Society □ □ □ □ 3
PO 7: Environment and
Sustainability
PO 8: Ethics (CO-4)
PO 9: Individual and Team Work □ □ □ □ 3
PO 11: Project Management
(CO-5)
Total Marks 25

Evaluator Name: _____________________________________________ Signature with Date:__________________________________________

`Comments______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

25
 Final Year Thesis/Project Evaluation (8th Semester Final Defense)

Thesis/Project Title: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Student Name :_________________________________________________________________________________ Student ID: ______________________________________________

Rubrics (Ri) PO Evaluation Marks

Unacceptabl Acceptable Adequate Proficient Total Obtained
e
R2 Organization and PO 10: Communication (CO-6) □ □ □ □ 5
Content of Presentation
R3 Societal Impact PO 6: The Engineer and Society □ □ □ □ 4
(CO-4)
R6 Tools and PO 5: Modern Tool Usage (CO-3) □ □ □ □ 4
Technologies
R7 Green Computing PO 7: Environment and Sustainability □ □ □ □ 3
(CO-4)
R8 Ethics PO 8: Ethics (CO-4) □ □ □ □ 3
R9 Individual/Team PO 9: Individual and Team Work (CO- □ □ □ □ 3
efforts 5)
R10 Life-long learning PO 12: Lifelong Learning (CO-6) □ □ □ □ 3
(internship/CPD
Points/Community
work/Society
Membership)
Total Marks 25

Evaluator Name: _____________________________________________ Signature with Date:__________________________________________

`Comments______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

26