Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Crafting an essay on the topic of "Best Essay Ever" is an intricate endeavor fraught with challenges
and paradoxes. The very premise sets an exceptionally high standard, demanding not just quality but
unparalleled excellence. One is immediately confronted with the daunting task of defining what
constitutes the "best" in an essay—a task rife with subjectivity and ambiguity.
To begin with, the pursuit of perfection in writing inevitably leads to a labyrinth of doubts and
uncertainties. Every word choice, every sentence structure, every rhetorical device must be
meticulously scrutinized, weighed, and reconsidered. The pressure to excel can be paralyzing,
breeding self-doubt and writer's block.
Furthermore, the inherent subjectivity of the topic complicates matters further. What one individual
perceives as the epitome of literary brilliance may fall flat for another. The diverse perspectives and
tastes of potential readers render the quest for universality a Herculean feat.
Moreover, the very act of striving to create the "best" essay risks stifling creativity and innovation.
The fear of failure, of not measuring up to an idealized standard, may discourage experimentation
and originality. In this relentless pursuit of perfection, the essence of genuine expression may be
lost.
Yet, perhaps the greatest challenge lies in the paradox inherent to the task. The notion of a "best"
essay implies a finality, a definitive pinnacle that leaves no room for improvement. And yet, the
beauty of writing lies in its infinite capacity for evolution and growth. The best essay today may be
surpassed tomorrow, as new ideas emerge and boundaries are pushed.
In conclusion, to embark on the journey of crafting the "Best Essay Ever" is to confront a myriad of
obstacles—self-doubt, subjectivity, the tyranny of perfection, and the paradox of finality. It is a
testament to the complexity and beauty of the written word, a testament to the endless quest for
excellence in expression.
Integrative Case
Group 6 Leslie Sosa July, 1st 2010 Christophe Delachanal Sébastien Lacour Charbel
Makhoul
BRL Hardy
Globalizing an Australian Wine Company
* Table of Content 1 Introduction 4 2 Hardy amp; BRL Merger amp; Acquisition Success
Analysis 5 2.1 Wine Industry Porter Forces Analysis 5 2.2 Pre M amp;A Conditions
Evaluation 6 2.3 Post Merger Management 6 3 The Stephen Davies amp; Christopher
Carlson Case 8 3.1 Sources of Tension 8 3.2 Steve Millar: Management of The Situation
9 3.3 Reflecting the situation Global Management Teams 9 4 New Product Launch: D
instinto 10 ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Changes in regulation, Medium 3/5
One of the major risk is from the government that can adopt more restrictive laws about
alcohol and driving. There is a potential threat also on sulphite regulation. Finally,
countries such as France and Italy try to protect their market with AOC and DOC
denomination.
Economical trends, low 0/5
There is a good economical trend for BRL Hardy. The exchange rate is in favour for
Australia in export. Furthermore, the market condition is very good thanks to local and
international growth and Australian wine becoming trendy.
Social pressure, low 0/5
According to cardiologist, they are saying that one glass of good wine is healthy.
Technology breakthroughs, high 4/5
Large scale wine suppliers from New World countries (US, SAm, SAf, Australia) were
exploiting modern viticulture and more scientific winemaking practices to produce more
consistent high quality wines .
Additional forces: Complements 0/5
No comment.
Pre M amp;A Conditions Evaluation
Before BRL and Hardy s merger they were considered rivals with different point of
views in their strategic process to the wine industry that led them each to have a different
organization overall. Hardy was known for its polite and traditional approach with award
winning quality wine and BRL s approach was focused on an aggressive and commercial
culture that followed its fortified, bulk, and value wines.
Throughout The Things They Carried, by Tim O Brien it is difficult to separate what is
fictitious, and what is true. During the entire work there are two different truths , which
are story truth and happening truth . Happening truth is the actual events that happen, and
is the foundation or time line on which the story is built on. Story truth is the molding or
re shaping of the happening truth that allows the story to be believable and enjoyable. It
is not easy to distinguish happening truth from story truth , and at times during the novel
O brien reveals which is which. On the other hand, when the reader is blind to ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Martha gave it to me herself (28). This makes the reader believe that the Tim O brien
who wrote the book is indeed the Tim O brien that is in the book, therefore this must be a
true story from his experiences in the Vietnam War. All the more, at the end of the
chapter he even asks Jimmy Cross permission to write the book the reader is looking at
right then and there, At the end, though, as we were walking out to his car, I told him that
I d like to write a story about some of this... Why not? he said... Make me out to be a
good guy, okay? Brave and handsome, all that stuff. Best platoon leader ever (29 30).
Like stated before, it is nearly impossible for a blind reader to distinguish the happening
truth from story truth , but it is possible that Tim O brien and Jimmy Cross did in fact
meet and talk for a day, but the honest facts may be twisted by story truth . For example,
O Brien may not remember his and Jimmy Cross conversation throughout that entire day
in great detail; therefore he may have had to formulate and make up certain parts in order
to fill in holes and perhaps make the interaction more interesting. The first three words of
the chapter How to Tell a True War Story are, This is true (67). Although Tim O Brien
begins this chapter with such a bold and clear statement, throughout the chapter he has
the reader thinking and confused when he contradicts himself by stating things such as,
In many cases a true war story cannot
An Essay On The Role Of Women In British Literature
MY HEART AND IN VINE OF DESIRE Women is the maker, the mother , the one who
keeps the whole human race thriving. Women do so many different roles and at the same
time the most vulnurable being of all. The role of women in society is constantly
questioned and for centuries women have struggled to find their place in a world that is
predominantly male oriented. In the contemporary age women got many opportunities in
all field, even though women face many struggles in their life. Throughout history, young
women have been scrutinized with regard to their attitudes, behavior, sexuality and
general conduct. Literature provides a window into the lives, thoughts and actions of
women during certain periods of time in a fictitious form, yet often truthful in many
ways. Through submissive natures, complaint men, using only silent means of escape.
Literature forms a means to express the pent up feelings of women and women
worldwide have used literature as a tool for expression. Many Indian writers have
established a place for themselves by voicing out their cries on behalf of the Indian
women. A close reading of British literature up to 19th century reveals that social issues
and challenges faced by women form a part of it but they were represented by male
writers, the validity of which is ambiguous. Women s literature which Jane Austen gave
rise in true sense, flourished not only in English Literature but also in other literatures.
Women writers at the beginning of any