The “PUB 083, sua 4s25 [A Steel Constru aT - Steel Co TN Dusen of Compete Tus Siteood Put Avot Bets $5708 ‘Appendix A: Design Example Fepionraag se cia ‘ina oar Pontoons 2940 met pu | ay 92 CALCULATION SHEET ” RML June 92 End moments due to Vierendeel action for central panel sae 4 Ginter + Exd Moments : {58 BS y 1S ZG SD | 5.18 kvm I sue ns Vertical shear divided equally between tep and bottom chords Note: Momzntz due to local bending Wa 10.2 EN, y Assume fixed-ended beam Wo = 0.56 + 2.66 +08) 3 X15 = I8.1kN 23 24 End moments — WILK LS 2 LIS kN = 23kNn Combined end moments in top chord $18 + 2.3 7.48 kim Axial Compressive force in tap chord (Central panel) Cosel w = 056% 13.5 x3 = 22.74N Axial force. = * ae = £SS.SEN Case 2 Momunt of mid-span = 56.3 6.75 - = 143.4kNm Axial force = 4 28-4 + 207.8kN Combined force = 55.5 + 207.8 = 263.3kNThe awe | PUB OSS snex 100825 [A Steel Construction SSS | pesign of Composite Trusses Institute a Sitwood Pak Asst Berks SLS7QN ceog —Abpendix A: Design Example ane rit | ey aaa — CALCULATION SHEET PML June 92 Shear Capacity (BS 5980: Part 1 Cl. 4. P, = 06 pA, where: py 296 Nina? A = Aad es 8588 ~T00 = 0.6.x 296 x 12:26 70 = U28kN Check for influence of shear on moment capacity 0.6 P, 0.6 x 217.8 130.7 KN "(actual vertical shear not likely to exceed 130.7 KN, s0 20 influence on moment capacity) Moment Capacity (BS 5950: Part 1 Cl. 4.2.5) Ma = Py (reduced) x Z, Ma, (Flange) = 26x 17/10" = BS KN Me (Toe) = 296% 49.510! = 14.65. kNeae PUB 083. show 5 of 25 Stel Construction LF a t Institute Design of Composite Trusses Sitwood Pari Ascot Berks SLS TON Appendiz Az Design Example Telephoae(034#) 2348 a Wade Pax (o3ee) 22988 ceca EM | May 98. CALCULATION SHEET RML June 92 Case 1 + Case 3 W = 162.080 BS Deck + Mesh 0.18 KN/m? Self weight girder 0.22 kN/n? Concrete slab = «LOO KN/m? 230 14 3.22 kW/m? Construction Load = 0.50 X 1.6 0.80 kN/n? 402K 135% 3 = 162.8kN ‘Axial compressive force in top chord at central panel (A:A) 162.8 x 13.5 1982 iN ox OD Local bending of top chord at central panel (A-A) End moments = = 2.3 kiN Span moments = = 2.3/2 = LISkNm ‘for further information see Sheet 4 ng oft 24 (o-b) Ww . Se x 162.8 = 28.9 iN B )W = 269N 24 Bind moments sa SHiNm 28.9 «24 - BR = 58kNm ob Span momentee PUB 083 shaot 8 ot 25 A Bea conrion LEO = cme : = Appendix A: Design Example = peta CALCULATION SHEET cme bY RML on June 92 ‘Top Chord Design BS S950: Part 1 Constmuction Staze Toy 127x152 x 21 kel Structural Tee Grade 50 Ara = 26.6 en? fae 3 = S68em* 2 = 6.2mm 5 = 270mm @ ass — = Laren BL Bsmt Section classification Table 7 (BS 5950: Part 1) 28 25 oe [2S 0.88 (2) kalo | Hange | 2 = BIS 2514 | r Tar i SIS < 85 x 0.58 = 148 —af|Les ee tee tecon Web (tem) ‘ = 183 = 19.16 1.16 > 19 x 0.88 = 16.72 i Web Stender As web is slender reduce p, in accordance with Table 8 of BS 5950: Part 1 fe 4 4 Reduction factor = - — = 0. fon foe a,” 3, ons te Bx 0.88 Si Py (reduced) = = 335 X 0.835 296 Nimn?Sted Construction Institute SX Ta PUB 083, shot Pot 25 ‘A Tae ~ Design of Composite Trusses Swed Pad Mot Ba SO" Appendix A: Design Example Tigemenasd | Pee simi Beam Fecfonen sve DM May 92 Sea Tas CALCULATION SHEET RML June 92 ‘Aid Capacity Compression In the construction sage it is assumed that the steel decking will provide adequate lateral restraint to the compression flange of the tee section. Therefore check buckling of the tee section about the major (x-x) axis. Note: Ifthe decking runs perallel to the top chord assume no restraint is provided. Consider a) central panel (A-A) ») panel (B-B) The effective length, Lz taken as 0.851. for both cases 0.85 x 1500 = IS x 2400 = 275 mm 2040 mm 1.5m panel A-A .4 m panel B-B Ll, = LL = Le (as s9s0: Pant 1 -C147.3.1) a o- AGA) = 1275162 = 7.00 DB) = 2080/46.2 = 44.16 JSrom Table 27(c) using p, = 296 N/mm? (reduced strength) pe (AA) = 281 N/m? D, (B-B) = 247 N/mm? Axial capacity = = AG X Pex P, (Ara) = 266% 2110 = ATEN F (BB) = 166x270 =~ OSTENThe "pup 083 shen 20025 | A Steel Construction Te istete Se | Dusen of Componte Truses Silwood Pask Atcot Berks SLS 70N Appendis A: Design Example x ota ia a ae Soot out | ay CALCULATION SHEET vee ML |" June 92 Member 135 (Diagonal) ‘Axlal Teusile force = 381 kN For 80 x 80 x 8L Grade 50 coatcamns = nen [yl Assume angle welded to the T-section 4 = (>-s] 0 -[#- = 608 mn? Gross arca of unconnected leg = -f)n = gs = 2 a [> 3]! {» S)8 608 mn 3x 608 OS + OS | 08 = an| (08 + 456 1068 mm? », 1068 x 35510 STTTRN > 190.5 kN For pracitcal reasons use 2 No. 80 x 80 x 8 L for all tension and compression members except the vertical braces Weight Schedule Descrpton | Seaion | Weigle | Number | Lengh | Tot | Weigh mm mm | gi me | Length 1s Tpetort [urxizt | a | 2 | 133 | us| 205 Botom chord |16sx1527 | 23 | 1 | ae | me | 3668 Bracing Diagonsts | 30x89x81) 9639 | 20 | 139| 2728 | 267.7 Vericas | s0xsoxst| 377 | 4 | o69| “276| “me Weight perm? ma 207, 9.1 iyae Design of Composite Trusses The "PUB 083, sma 11425 | 2 caunuion EE fore Saoot Pa ta dis A: Design Ecample ute SES TON ‘Telephone (0344) 23365, Mads by Pax (0044) 22844 emer CALCULATION SHEET ” RM. June 2 Combined stresses for load cases Load Cases Overall buckling check Cases 142 Pand (AA) = 0.863 < 1.0 0K Cases 1+ 3 398.2 Panel (A-A) aT < 100K au, Pand (B-B) “Te = 0.87 < 1.00K Cases 1+ 4 3802 , 3.0 Pand (A-A) a = 0.074 < 1.0 OK Cases 1+ 5 239 , 656 Pand (B-B) G7 * 14.65 = 0.865 < 1.0 OK Notes: Do AgPy = 26.6 X10 x 29610 = 787.4 KN 2 My = ge members considered as restrained m= = ‘1.0 (conservatively assumed because m factor is not readily determined for moment variation along T section) fe 200_||, 240 br xia Tr {oma a Mid panel‘The Zee | Pus 083 shoe 120425 | “A Steel Construction SSS [7 or Composite Trusses Instat Se EM teen of Compost 7 ‘Silwood Park Ascot Berks SLS 70N- an Appendix. A: Design Example Poesy * pum | stay 92 CALCULATION SHEET a ae Erection Stage 4. 3 AN Aasuned nde pséon ww fotiing 1 a For the purposes of this example assume lifting angle = 30° Self weight of ginter = 0.22 kN/m?* Factored load = = 0.22. 138 3 KLE = tain 43 Compresive chortfore = Hx P= Baw Bending effects (assume UDL between lifting nodes) Compressive chord force = = 25iN <. maximum chord force D4A+ 225 34.9 kN Top chord section ~ 127 x 152 x 21 ke/m T section Grade 50 Note: section classification is ‘slender’ = 270mm, Area = 26.6 en? 8700 2 aos = ma = 296 Nim 0 Pn Bey = 18.0 Nira? R= 66x 1 = a7 9KN> 24940 OK + Check weight of girder when the design has been finalised (see Sheet 21).The yarar | PUB O88 soon 160125 [A st Contrsion EL | pos of Compote Tae Sitwood Pak Ane Bes $18 708 ‘Appendix A: Design Example shone 34 ie Ne tam Faunpepe put May 92 CALCULATION SHEET eS ea | June 92 Therefore, R, is the smaller of Ny Oy OF A, Py where: etka avenge of each shear connecior f, ts the number of shear connectors over the opening ‘Shear stud design Studs 19 dia x 95 long LW concrete Grade 35 104 kN from Table 5 BS 5950: Part 3 104x009 = —93.6kN Q , (using LWC) 0, = 96X08 = 749KN Stud Laxout Deck trough centres 300 mam Slab depth, D, 130 mm ‘Max. spacing 4 x 130 = 520mm < 600 mm Ss max spacing = = “520. mm As deck trough centres are at 300 mm limit stud positions to 1 per trough 300 1500 Vierd. panel 7s0,| 750, ‘Maximum force in the bottom chord = 1047.25 AN Required Noopsnts = 18725 = 149-< 21 spp Between support and end af opening Although 14 studs would be adequate, 21 studs are required due to the requirements of| stud spacingTore Fev The Zee PUB 083 snow 140825 [A Steel Construction “SESS | pesign of Composite Trusses Sivoo Pak Asa Ba SOPS appendix A: Design Example rans “mn meer pi |" May 92 CALCULATION sheer SEY uae | June 92 Composite Truss Overall Bending It is assumed conservatively that the 1op chord (see Section 4.1) is neglected in overall bending calculations. Concrete resistance, R, Re = OAS Soy By Xe 0:45 238° 3000 x 3, 10? = 4725%, ‘Steel resistance, Ry Ap, 29.8 % 355/10 1087.3 kN Neutral axis depth in concrete, x, mas | 13 = ann Moment pacts, M = 10873 x e+ 10-109 - 2 = 1073 «03808 = 888 INm > 779.1 kNm OK ‘Top & Bottom chords satisfactory with respect to overall bending of the composite trussThe rar | “PUB 083 sheet 3ot 25 ‘A 5 cantrtn SEL forrest — Les Insitute a Siood Pu Ato: Ba SLE 706 Appendix A: Design Ex Fionn amu " put | ay 92 CALCULATION SHEET see amt | june 92 Case 1 + Case 2 Design central panel for axial compressive force and moments due to local and Vierendeel bending. 05x 16= 0.08 19x 18> 266 S46 x 9x75 = 77.94N Shear force 18 lagtam Lor Ra= 56.3 kN as 6 kN 56.3 wy pale m panel y= 21.6 x 0.58/2.08 = 601N Average shear across central panel 5.0 + 21.6 —TThe rarer |” PUB O83 sie 150025 [A Steel Construction << ToT pari [LEP peste of Compaste Passes Sitwod Pe Aso Bess SS 70N Appendix A: Design Example Tee 0240 248 aa coo oe Fenlsun sac me put | stay 92 CALCULATION SHEET "RML |" June 92 er central Consider imposed load on half span Misi Ts rocsey hs 354 kN Shear force in Vierendeel panel = 35.4 kN ‘+ Vierendeel moment due to imposed load on half span 35.4 x 1S ‘53.1 kNm For equilibrium M, = 53.1 kN Moment resistance for Vierendee! bending is: M, My + 2M, (- TR) + 2M, where: Mc, is the moment resisiance due to composite action of the top chord ‘and slab. Mey ~ RL (Dy + Dj) /2 4%] R Ag By (tensile resistance af bottom chord) 29.3'x = 1047.3 kN Ms Z, (moment capacity of botom chord) , 55% 44.110° 15.7 kNm (minimum value) Note: bottom chord is in tension, therefore no stress reduction for compression bending Byy Dy = 1.65 km (sce Sheet 10) The value of R, is dependent on the number of shear studs across the panel. This determines the maximum tensile force that can be generated in the top chord.The <7" PUB 083 sieet 240125 | "A Steel Construction Tea Institute > Design of Composite Trusses Sane Siwood Pate Ate Beda SLS 7QN ce —Aepunat A: Design Example Tethose 0340 25345, ia 2 r Fret) 2944 ee pee | ay 92 CALCULATION SHEET RML ‘Tune 2 Position of cg for Top & Bottom Chords (26.6 + 140) 5.63 + 29.5 x 85.91 5 = (HS BET (140 + 26.6 + 29.5)7 17.7 em Second moment of area of composite truss = SZ + 40 + 26.6) 12.07" + S41 + 29.5 x 68.2P = SIM + 2471 + S41 + 137252 = 167183 emt Imposed load deflection w a 4.35 x 13.5 3 = 176.24N 5% 176.2 x 13500 384 X 205 x 167188 x 10° = 165mm Allow an increase of 10% for the Vierendeel action *. 5, = 18.1 mm (1/745) OK Suammars Total Detection Construction Stage (Non Composite) 23.7 mm Imposed (Composite) a 18.1 mn Superdead cés = 0.35, Raised Floor = 0.50 O85 kNim? x 135 x3 = 34.4kN - x ME mm - rom 4 16.5» 3.2 mm + 10% 35 Total Deflection Construction Stage = 23.7 mm Super Dead = as Deed 72m Imposed 18.9 = (749 < 1/360) OK 45.1 mm (1/298) OK‘The 472 = 23.5KN {Use 2.No, $0 x $0 x $ L Grade 50Bee namution EE barr PLE snes 7ot 25 ‘A onstruction “SS * Design of Composite Trusses Institute SS Pasian of Composite Tru Siwoa! Put Asc pessts7e [Appendix A: Design Example Texpone 0344) 23365 wm oy ie Facto ae mere DEM | May 92 CALCULATION SHEET ee em | June 92 Case 1 + Case 5 (panet 8-8) W= 23.2 ENN W = 24713.5% 150.4 = 2.2kN ow FY 64 IN Ry = B.9KN = 64X99, 104 9KN as 2 ‘ point load vositic = DIK 36 ~ 34.8 3.6/2 0.8 24 End moments: = 656KNm Span moment = 424KkNmThe ery | "PUB 083 shost 19 25 Steel Construction ee fT i istate > wn Pesan of Composite Truses Sitwood Paik Ascot Bets SLS TON og Anpendic A: Design Example “elhone 0360) 25348 am 7 ie Pontos sae ewes DEM | May 92 CALCULATION SHEET “RML |" June 92 Bracing Members ‘Assumptions Pinned analysis of truss under full symmetrical leading i) Axial forces obtained by resolving forces around cach joint iii) Bracing members designed os single angle strats el. 4.7.10.2(a) Stonderness taken as the greater of: Do O85 Ly! Ty but > OT Ly / my + IS eh but = OLS ra, + 30 3) O85 Ly Ty uk 7 Lay / typ + 30 Firstly, check compression member Member 2-5 ‘Try 80 x 80 x 8 Gmde 50 Axial compressive force per member 383 383 = 101.5 kw 2 Section properties = 12.3 em? 24.3 mm = 156mm Lak, Check section classification bed , 0° 229 < 23x (275) = 202 OK 3 335 T 2: Section NOT slender 2 taken as: Dy 85_* 1385 = 75.8; O7* 1985 415 = 77.1 (criterion) 15.6 156 2 Ox 1385 = 5% TRIS , 39 2 O99 as ra 3) 8S x 1385 = 4; 7XBSE 3 = 9 243 ma Ataken as 77.1 from Table 27(<) pe = ‘197 Nimm? = 12.3 MUP x 197108 = 24D KN > 190.5 kN OK Use 2/80 x 80 x 8 L Grade $0The rar | pun 083 sien 250025 [A Pxcmanin © ‘Sitwood Pak Ascot Berks SL3 7Ht Appendix A: Design Example sain rate rnd se am Fax (0344) 22944 oma ag — a CALCULATION SHEET " RML June 92 Natural Frequency Loading considered Dead + 10% Imposed (not including partitions) BIS + 10% of (4.35 - 1.0) BIS + 0.34 = 3.49 kN/m? Woe see nsKs = nay Deflection due to self weight - 5 x 1413 x 135007 384 x 205 x 167188+ x 10° 13.2 mm 18 3.2 = S0H,>4.0H, OK Frequency = “+ Floor structure satisfactory for natural frequency * For natural frequency the second moment of area could be increased by 10% to take account of the increased dynamic stiffness of the composite beam.