A response matrix for Commenton Draft Design Drawing of KecheneKuskuam

Retaining wall design drawing

Comments from Client
Subject/Ref
Response

As per our review we have the

following comment on the Revised
Design Drawing you have submitted.
o Comment accepted, this
➢ Elevation view / profile view
inconvenience happened due
does not contain all the
General to separate submission of the
necessary information’s required
geometric and structural
for the construction of the
design drawings
structural member; Hence please
provide complete information
o Comment appreciated, it is
➢ The foundation longitudinal
common to use a continuous
profile shows it is to be
longitudinal footing gradient
constructed in an inclined level;
in line with the road profile
do you think it is structurally
for a retaining wall structure
possible to construct the
for gentle terrain. Since the
retaining wall accordingly;
project location is not
please give your justification
susceptible for sliding and
➢ Please generate and show the earthquake, using a Stepped
retaining wall section view in footing would make the
respect with road cross-section construction less workable.
@ every 10 meters interval o Comment accepted and
➢ Pedestrian railings are not retaining wall cross-section
provided in the drawing; which would be incorporated at
are very important for safety least for each 20m interval
during operation time; Hence sections in addition to the
please provide or give your previous typical retaining
justification wall x-section
o Comment accepted and asteel
post and railing will be used