Please read the form carefully and fill in all the fields accordingly.

Please keep your

replies concise and make sure you have filled in each parameter. Kindly also mention
your reasons for acceptance/rejection clearly.

I. TITLE AND NATURE OF THE BLOG

(Case Comment/ Article/ Legislative Comment/Book Review)

II. STRUCTURE AND LOGICAL COHERENCE

(Does the author outline the structure of his work systematically? Do the
introductory paragraphs lay down a structure and is that structure consistently
followed? Is the author’s approach the correct approach to the research question?
Has the author been able to link different parts of his/her argument together
logically?

How would you rate the blog’s structure and logical coherence? (Out of 10)
III. CONTRIBUTION TO EXISTING LITERATURE
(What is the author’s contribution to the subject? Has the author built on the
existing literature on the subject in such a way as to contribute something new?
Has the author explained something in a novel way?)

How would you rate the blog’s contribution to existing literature? (Out of 10)

IV. CONTEMPORARY RELEVANCE

(Does the subject matter relate to an issue in the past year? Has the subject matter
been linked to the present day in any way if it is not of contemporary
significance?)

How would you rate the blog’s contemporaneity? (Out of 10)

V. REFERENCING AND RESEARCH

(How well-researched is the article? Has the author used references to support
his/her arguments in the right places? Has the author avoided redundant
referencing? What is the quality of the references?)

How would you rate the references used by the author? (Out of 10)

VI. SUGGESTED CHANGES (IF ANY)

 (Would you suggest changes to the article before publishing? If so, please provide
instances for change and reasons behind suggesting these changes.)

VII. TOTAL MARKING OF THE BLOG (OUT OF 50)

VIII. ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF THE BLOG

(Yes/No/I would prefer if someone else had a look)