Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ebook PDF Program Evaluation For Social Workers Foundations of Evidence Based Programs 7Th Edition Ebook PDF Full Chapter
Ebook PDF Program Evaluation For Social Workers Foundations of Evidence Based Programs 7Th Edition Ebook PDF Full Chapter
Preface
1. Toward Accountability
3. The Process
The Process
Step 1: Engage Stakeholders
Why Stakeholders Are Important to an Evaluation
9
The Role of Stakeholders in an Evaluation
STEP 2: Describe the Program
Using a Logic Model to Describe Your Program
Step 3: Focus the Evaluation
Types of Evaluations
Narrowing Down Evaluation Questions
Step 4: Gathering Credible Data
Step 5: Justifying Your Conclusions
Step 6: Ensuring Usage and Sharing Lessons Learned
Summary
4. Standards
5. Ethics
Code of Ethics
Step 3: Focusing the Evaluation
Step 3A: Refine Evaluation Question Through the Literature
Step 3B: Selecting an Evaluation Design
Step 3C: Specifying How Variables Are Measured
Step 4: Gathering Data
Step 4A: Selecting Evaluation Participants
Step 4B: Selecting a Data Collection Method
Step 4C: Analyzing the Data
Step 6: Ensure Usage and Share Lessons Learned
Revealing Negative Findings
Special Considerations
International Research
Computer and Internet-Based Research Guidance
Students as Subjects/Students as Researchers
Summary
6. Cultural Competence
Our Village
Working with Stakeholder Groups
Your Evaluation Team
The Impact of Culture
Bridging the Culture Gap
Cultural Awareness
Intercultural Communication
Cultural Frameworks
Orientation to Data
Decision-Making
Individualism
10
Tradition
Pace of Life
Culturally Competent Evaluators
Develop Cultural Awareness
Develop Intercultural Communication Skills
Develop Specific Knowledge about the Culture
Develop an Ability to Adapt Evaluations
Summary
7. The Program
The Agency
Mission Statements
Goals
The Program
Naming Programs
An Agency Versus a Program
Designing Programs
Evidence-Based Programs
Writing Program Goals
Preparing for Unintended Consequences
Program Goals Versus Agency Goals
Program Objectives
Knowledge-Based Objectives
Affect-Based Objectives
Behaviorally Based Objectives
Writing Program Objectives
Specific (S)
Measurable (M)
Achievable (A)
Realistic (R)
Time Phased (T)
Indicators
Practice Objectives
Example: Bob’s Self-Sufficiency
Practice Activities
Logic Models
Positions Your Program for Success
Simple and Straightforward Pictures
Reflect Group Process and Shared Understanding
Change Over Time
Summary
11
Models Begin with Results
Logic Models and Effectiveness
Basic Program Logic Models
Assumptions Matter
Key Elements of Program Logic Models
Nonlinear Program Logic Models
Hidden Assumptions and Dose
Building a Logic Model
From Strategy to Activities
Action Steps for a Program Logic Model
Creating Your Program Logic Model
Summary
Planning Ahead
Strategy 1: Working with Stakeholders
Strategy 2: Managing the Evaluation
Strategy 3: Pilot-Testing
Strategy 4: Training Data Collection Staff
Strategy 5: Monitoring Progress
Strategy 6: Reporting Results
Interim Reporting
Disseminating Final Results
Strategy 7: Developing a Plan
Strategy 8: Documenting Lessons Learned
Strategy 9: Linking Back to your Evaluation Plan
Summary
12
Secondary Data
Individual Interviews
Group Interviews
Telephone and Mail Surveys
Step 4D: Analyzing and Displaying Data
Quantitative Data
Qualitative Data
Step 6A: Disseminating and Communicating Evaluation Results
Summary
Definition
Example
Purpose
Improving a Program’s Operations
Generating Knowledge
Estimating Cost Efficiency
Step 3A: Deciding What Questions to Ask
Question 1: What Is the Program’s Background?
Question 2: What Is the Program’s Client Profile?
Question 3: What Is the Program’s Staff Profile?
Question 4: What Is the Amount of Service Provided to Clients?
Question 5: What Are the Program’s Interventions and Activities?
Question 6: What Administrative Supports Are in Place?
Question 7: How Satisfied Are the Program’s Stakeholders?
Question 8: How Efficient Is the Program?
Step 4A: Developing Data Collection Instruments
Easy to Use
Appropriate to the Flow of a Program’s Operations
Obtaining User Input
Step 4B: Developing a Data Collection Monitoring System
Determining Number of Cases to Include
Determining Times to Collect Data
Selecting a Data Collection Method(s)
Step 4C: Scoring and Analyzing Data
Step 4D: Developing a Feedback System
Step 6A: Disseminating and Communicating Evaluation Results
Summary
Purpose
Uses
Improving Program Services to Clients
Generating Knowledge for the Profession
Step 3: Specifying Program Objectives
Performance Indicators Versus Outcome Indicators
Step 4A: Measuring Program Objectives
Pilot-Testing the Measuring Instrument
Step 4B: Designing a Monitoring System
How Many Clients Should Be Included?
When Will Data Be Collected?
How Will Data Be Collected?
13
Step 4C: Analyzing and Displaying Data
Step 4D: Developing a Feedback System
Step 6A: Disseminating and Communicating Evaluation Results
Summary
Purpose
Workers’ Roles
Administrative Support
Creating a Culture of Excellence
Establishing an Organizational Plan
Collecting Case-Level Data
Collecting Program-Level Data
Collecting Data at Client Intake
Collecting Data at Each Client Contact
Collecting Data at Client Termination
Collecting Data to Obtain Client Feedback
Managing Data
Managing Data Manually
Managing Data with Computers
Writing Reports
A Look to the Future
Summary
14
15. Making Decisions
Principle Duties
Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities
Overarching Items
Step 1: Engage Stakeholders
Step 2: Describe the Program
Step 3: Focus the Evaluation Design
Step 4: Gather Credible Data
Step 5: Justify Conclusions
Step 6: Ensure Use and Share Lessons Learned
Stakeholders’ Anxiety
Evaluators’ Anxiety
Interactive Evaluation Practice Continuum
15
Evaluation Capacity Building Framework
Dual Concerns Model
Evaluation Context
Evaluation Logistics
Data Collection
Data Analysis
Dissemination of Evaluation Findings
One-Group Designs
One-Group Posttest-Only Design
Cross-Sectional Survey Design
Longitudinal Designs
Cohort Studies
One-Group Pretest–Posttest Design
Interrupted Time-Series Design
Internal Validity
History
Maturation
Testing
Instrumentation Error
Statistical Regression
Differential Selection of Evaluation Participants
Mortality
Reactive Effects of Research Participants
Interaction Effects
Relations between Experimental and Control Groups
Two-Group Designs
Comparison Group Pretest–Posttest Design
Comparison Group Posttest-Only Design
Classical Experimental Design
Randomized Posttest-Only Control Group Design
External Validity
Selection–Treatment Interaction
Specificity of Variables
Multiple-Treatment Interference
Researcher Bias
Summary
16
Basic Yearly Progress Timeline
Milestone Table
Gantt Chart
Shared Calendar
Strategy 4: Periodic Evaluation Progress Reports
Evaluation Progress Report
Evaluation Status Report
Data Source(S)
People
Existing Data
People or Existing Data?
Sampling Methods
Probability Sampling
Nonprobability Sampling
Collecting Data
Obtaining Existing Data
Obtaining New Data
Data Collection Plan
Summary
Why Measure?
Objectivity
Precision
17
Levels of Measurement
Nominal Measurement
Ordinal Measurement
Interval Measurement
Ratio Measurement
Describing Variables
Correspondence
Standardization
Quantification
Duplication
Criteria for Selecting a Measuring Instrument
Utility
Sensitivity to Small Changes
Reliability
Validity
Reliability and Validity Revisited
Measurement Errors
Constant Errors
Random Errors
Improving Validity and Reliability
Summary
Glossary
References
Credits
Index
18
19
Preface
The first edition of this book appeared on the scene over two decades ago. As with the previous six editions,
this one is also geared for graduate-level social work students—as their first introduction to evaluating social
service programs. We have selected and arranged its content so it can be mainly used in a social work program
evaluation course. Over the years, however, it has also been adopted in graduate-level management courses,
leadership courses, program design courses, program planning courses, social policy courses, and as a
supplementary text in research methods courses, in addition to field integration seminars. Ideally, students
should have completed their required foundational research methods course prior to this one.
Before we began writing this edition we asked ourselves one simple question: “What can realistically be
covered in a one-semester course?” You’re holding the answer to our question in your hands; that is, students
can easily get through the entire book in one semester.
GOAL
Our principal goal is to present only the core material that students realistically need to know in order for
them to appreciate and understand the role that evaluation has within professional social work practice. Thus
unnecessary material is avoided at all costs. To accomplish this goal, we strived to meet three highly
overlapping objectives:
1. To prepare students to cheerfully participate in evaluative activities within the programs that hire them
after they graduate.
2. To prepare students to become beginning critical producers and consumers of the professional evaluative
literature.
3. Most important, to prepare students to fully appreciate and understand how case- and program-level
evaluations will help them to increase their effectiveness as beginning social work practitioners.
CONCEPTUAL APPROACH
With our goal and three objectives in mind, our book presents a unique approach in describing the place of
evaluation in the social services. Over the years, little has changed in the way in which most evaluation
textbooks present their material. A majority of texts focus on program-level evaluation and describe project
types of approaches; that is, one-shot approaches implemented by specialized evaluation departments or
external consultants. On the other hand, a few recent books deal with case-level evaluation but place the most
emphasis on inferentially powerful—but difficult to implement—experimental and multiple baseline designs.
This book provides students with a sound conceptual understanding of how the ideas of evaluation can be used in
the delivery of social services.
20
We collectively have over 100 years of experience of doing case- and program-level evaluations within the
social services. Our experiences have convinced us that neither of these two distinct approaches adequately
reflects the realities in our profession or the needs of beginning practitioners. Thus we describe how data
obtained through case-level evaluations can be aggregated to provide timely and relevant data for program-
level evaluations. Such information, in turn, is the basis for a quality improvement process within the entire
organization. We’re convinced that this integration will play an increasingly prominent role in the future.
We have omitted more advanced methodological and statistical material such as a discussion of celeration
lines, autocorrelation, effect sizes, and two standard-deviation bands for case-level evaluations, as well as
advanced methodological and statistical techniques for program-level evaluations.
The integration of case- and program-level evaluation approaches is one of the unique features of this book.
Some readers with a strict methodological orientation may find that our approach is simplistic, particularly
the material on the aggregation of case-level data. We are aware of the limitations of the approach, but we
firmly believe that this approach is more likely to be implemented by beginning practitioners than are other
more complicated, technically demanding approaches. It’s our view that it’s preferable to have such data, even
if they are not methodologically “airtight,” than to have no aggregated data at all. In a nutshell, our approach
is realistic, practical, applied, and, most important, student-friendly.
THEME
We maintain that professional social work practice rests upon the foundation that a worker’s practice activities
must be directly relevant to obtaining the client’s practice objectives, which are linked to the program’s
objectives, which are linked to the program’s goal, which represents the reason why the program exists in the
first place. The evaluation process presented in our book heavily reflects these connections.
Pressures for accountability have never been greater. Organizations and practitioners of all types are
increasingly required to document the impacts of their services not only at the program level but at the case
level as well. Continually, they are challenged to improve the quality of their services, and they are required to
do this with scarce resources. In addition, few social service organizations can adequately maintain an internal
evaluation department or hire outside evaluators. Consequently, we place a considerable emphasis on
monitoring, an approach that can be easily incorporated into the ongoing activities of the social work
practitioners within their respective programs.
In short, we provide a straightforward view of evaluation while taking into account:
21
• The present evaluation needs of students as well as their needs in the first few years of their careers
Publishing a seventh edition may indicate that we have attracted loyal followers over the years. Conversely, it
also means that making major changes from one edition to the next can be hazardous to the book’s long-
standing appeal.
New content has been added to this edition in an effort to keep information current while retaining
material that has stood the test of time. With the guidance of many program evaluation instructors and
students alike, we have clarified material that needed further clarification, deleted material that needed
deletion, and simplified material that needed simplification.
Like all introductory program evaluation books, ours too had to include relevant and basic evaluation
content. Our problem here was not so much what content to include as what to leave out. We have done the
customary updating and rearranging of material in an effort to make our book more practical and “student
friendly” than ever before. We have incorporated suggestions by numerous reviewers and students over the
years while staying true to our main goal—providing students with a useful and practical evaluation book that
they actually understand and appreciate.
Let’s now turn to the specifics of “what’s new.”
22
Tool J. Effective Communication and Reporting
Tool K. Developing an Action Plan
• We have moved the Evaluation Toolkit to the end of the book (Part V).
• We have significantly increased the number of macro-practice examples throughout the chapters.
• We have expanded the book’s Glossary to over 620 terms.
• Study questions are included at the end of each chapter. The questions are in the order the content is
covered in the chapter. This makes it easy for the students to answer the questions.
• A student self-efficacy quiz is included at the end of each chapter. Instructors can use each student’s
score as one of the measurements for a behavioral practice objective that can be reported to the Council
on Social Work Education (2015).
Students are encouraged to take the chapter’s self-efficacy quiz before reading the chapter and after
they have read it. Taking the quiz before they read the chapter will prepare them for what to expect in
the chapter, which in turn will enhance their learning experience—kind of like one of the threats to
internal validly, initial measurement effects.
• We repeat important concepts throughout the book. Instructors who have taught program evaluation
courses for several years are acutely aware of the need to keep reemphasizing basic concepts throughout
the semester such as validity and reliability; constants and variables; randomization and random
assignment; internal and external validly; conceptualization and operationalization; theory of change
models and program logic models; case-level evaluations and program-level evaluations; accountability
and quality improvement; standardized and nonstandardized measuring instruments; confidentiality and
anonymity; data sources and data collection methods; internal and external evaluations; practice
activities, practice objectives, program objectives, and program goals; in addition to standards, ethics, and
cultural considerations.
Thus we have carefully tied together these major concepts not only within chapters but across chapters
as well. There’s deliberate repetition, as we strongly feel that the only way students can really understand
fundamental evaluation concepts is for them to come across the concepts throughout the entire semester
—via the chapters contained in this book. Readers will, therefore, observe our tendency to explain
evaluation concepts in several different ways throughout the entire text.
Now that we know “what’s new” in this edition, the next logical question is: “What’s the same?” First, we
didn’t delete any chapters that were contained in the previous one. In addition, the following also remains the
same:
• We discuss the application of evaluation methods in real-life social service programs rather than in
artificial settings.
• We heavily include human diversity content throughout all chapters in the book. Many of our examples
center on women and minorities, in recognition of the need for students to be knowledgeable of their
special needs and problems.
In addition, we have given special consideration to the application of evaluation methods to the study
23
of questions concerning these groups by devoting a full chapter to the topic (i.e., Chapter 6).
• We have written our book in a crisp style using direct language; that is, students will understand all the
words.
• Our book is easy to teach from and with.
• We have made an extraordinary effort to make this edition less expensive, more esthetically pleasing, and
much more useful to students than ever before.
• Abundant tables and figures provide visual representation of the concepts presented in our book.
• Numerous boxes are inserted throughout to complement and expand on the chapters; these boxes
present interesting evaluation examples; provide additional aids to student learning; and offer historical,
social, and political contexts of program evaluation.
• The book’s website is second to none when it comes to instructor resources.
PARTS
Before we even begin to discuss how to conduct evaluations in Part III, Part I includes a serious dose of how
evaluations help make our profession to become more accountable (Chapter 1) and how all types of
evaluations (Chapter 2) go through a common process that utilizes the program’s stakeholders right from the
get-go (Chapter 3). Part I then goes on to discuss how all types of evaluations are influenced by standards
(Chapter 4), ethics (Chapter 5), and culture (Chapter 6).
So before students begin to get into the real nitty-gritty of actually designing social service programs (Part
II) and implementing evaluations (Part III), they will fully understand the various contextual issues that all
evaluative efforts must address. Part I continues to be the hallmark of this book as it sets the basic foundation
that students need to appreciate before any kind of evaluation can take place.
Students are aware of the various contextual issues that are involved in all evaluations after reading Part I.
They then are ready to actually understand what social work programs are all about—the purpose of Part II.
This part contains two chapters that discuss how social work programs are organized (Chapter 7) and how
theory of change and program logic models are used not only to create new programs, to refine the delivery
services of existing ones, to guide practitioners in the development of practice and program objectives, but to
help in the formulation of evaluation questions as well (Chapter 8).
The chapters and parts were written to be independent of one another. They can be assigned out of the order they
are presented, or they can be selectively omitted.
We strongly believe that students need to know what a social work program is all about (Part II) before
they can evaluate it (Part III). How can they do a meaningful evaluation of a social work program if they don’t
know what it’s supposed to accomplish in the first place? In particular, our emphasis on the use of logic
models, not only to formulate social work programs but to evaluate them as well, is another highlight of the
24
book.
After students know how social work programs are designed (Part II), in addition to being aware of the
contextual issues they have to address (Part I) in designing them, they are in an excellent position to evaluate
the programs.
The first chapter in Part III, Chapter 9, presents a comprehensive framework on preparing students to do
an evaluation before they actually do one; that is, students will do more meaningful evaluations if they are
prepared in advance to address the various issues that will arise when their evaluation actually gets underway—
and trust us, issues will arise.
When it comes to preparing students to do an evaluation, we have appropriated the British Army’s official
military adage of “the 7 Ps,” Proper Planning and Preparation Prevents Piss Poor Performance. Not
eloquently stated—but what the heck—it’s official so it must be right. Once students are armed with all their
“preparedness,” the following four chapters illustrate the four types of program evaluations they can do with all
of their “planning skills” enthusiastically in hand.
The remaining four chapters in Part III present how to do four basic types of evaluations in a step-by-step
approach. Chapter 10 describes how to do basic needs assessments and briefly presents how they are used in
the development of new social service programs as well as refining the services within existing ones. It
highlights the four types of social needs within the context of social problems.
Once a program is up and running, Chapter 11 presents how we can do a process evaluation within the
program in an effort to refine the services that clients receive and to maintain the program’s fidelity. It
highlights the purposes of process evaluations and places a great deal of emphasis on how to decide what
questions the evaluation will answer.
Chapter 12 provides the rationale for doing outcome evaluations within social service programs. It
highlights the need for developing a solid monitoring system for the evaluation process.
Once an outcome evaluation is done, programs can use efficiency evaluations to monitor their cost-
effectiveness/benefits—the topic of Chapter 13. This chapter highlights the cost-benefit approach to
efficiency evaluation and also describes the cost-effectiveness approach.
In sum, Part III clearly acknowledges that there are many forms that evaluations can take and presents four
of the most common ones. Note that the four types of evaluation discussed in our book are linked in an
ordered sequence as outlined in the following figure.
25
Part IV: Making Decisions with Data
After an evaluation is completed (Part III), decisions need to be made from the data collected—the purpose of
Part IV. This part contains two chapters; the first describes how to develop a data information system
(Chapter 14), and the second (Chapter 15) describes how to make decisions from the data that have been
collected with the data information system discussed in the previous chapter.
Part V presents an Evaluation Toolkit that contains 13 basic “research methodology– type tools,” if you will,
that were probably covered in the students’ foundational research methods courses. The tools are nothing
more than very brief “cheat sheets” that create a bridge between Part III (four basic types of evaluations) and
Part IV (how to make decisions with data). So in reality, the tools briefly present basic research methodology
that students will need in order for them to appreciate the entire evaluation process.
For example, let’s say an instructor requires students to write a term paper that discusses how to do a
hypothetical outcome evaluation of their field placement (or work) setting. This of course, assumes they are
26
actually placed in a social work program that has some resemblance to the content provided in Chapter 7. It
would be difficult, if not impossible, to write a respectable program outcome evaluation proposal without
using the following tools:
Obviously, students can easily refer to their research methods books they purchased for their past
foundational research methods courses to brush up on the concepts contained in the toolkit. In fact, we prefer
they do just that, since these books cover the material in more depth and breadth than the content contained
in the toolkit. However, what are the chances that these books are on their bookshelves? We bet slim to none.
That’s why we have included a toolkit.
We in no way suggest that all the research methodology students will need to know to do evaluations in the
real world is contained within the toolkit. It is simply not a substitute for a basic research methods book (e.g.,
Grinnell & Unrau, 2014) and statistics book (e.g., Weinbach & Grinnell, 2015).
INSTRUCTOR RESOURCES
Instructors have a password-protected tab (Instructor Resources) on the book’s website that contains links.
Each link is broken down by chapter. They are invaluable, and you are encouraged to use them.
The field of program evaluation in our profession is continuing to grow and develop. We believe this
edition will contribute to that growth. An eighth edition is anticipated, and suggestions for it are more than
welcome. Please e-mail your comments directly to rick.grinnell@wmich.edu.
If our book helps students acquire basic evaluation knowledge and skills and assists them in more advanced
evaluation and practice courses, our efforts will have been more than justified. If it also assists them to
incorporate evaluation techniques into their practice, our task will be fully rewarded.
27
28
PART I
Preparing for Evaluations
Part I contains six chapters that set the stage for all types of evaluations. They provide the foundational
knowledge that students need to appreciate and understand before they should even consider undertaking any
type of program evaluation; that is, the chapters provide important background material that prepares them
for the evaluation enterprise.
Our students have told us that they refer to Part I as “fixin’ to get ready.”
29
Chapter 1 discusses how social work practitioners are accountable to various stakeholder groups via program
evaluations. It presents the quality improvement process as an integral part of any social service program and
highlights the various stakeholder groups that must be consulted before doing any kind of evaluation. It also
discusses the concept of evaluation within the person-in-environment perspective and program-in-
environment perspective. The chapter ends with a brief distinction between “research” and “evaluation” and
ultimately provides a definition of program evaluation.
Chapter 2 presents the advantages and disadvantages of the two common approaches to evaluation: the
project approach and the monitoring approach. It then goes on to discuss the four generic types of evaluations:
need, process, outcome, and efficiency. The chapter ends with an introduction to what internal and external
evaluations are all about.
30
Chapter 3 presents the generic six-step evaluation process (i.e., engage stakeholders, describe the program,
focus the evaluation design, gather credible data, justify conclusions, ensure usage and share lessons learned).
Chapter 4 discusses the four evaluation standards (i.e., utility, feasibility, propriety, accuracy). The next part
presents how professional evaluation standards sometimes collide with politics. The remainder of the chapter
discusses what happens when standards are not followed.
Chapter 5 presents the various ethical issues that need to be taken into account when doing program
evaluations. The chapter describes how informed consent and assent are obtained in addition to delineating
the ethical issues that arise in all phases of the evaluation process.
Chapter 6 describes how we, as professional evaluators, must be culturally sensitive in our evaluation
endeavors. It provides numerous guidelines to prepare the evaluator to be as culturally sensitive as possible
while doing an evaluation.
In sum, the six chapters in Part I provide an “evaluation context springboard” by getting readers ready to
actually evaluate programs via the four types of program evaluations that are found in Part III—needs
assessments (Chapter 10), process evaluations (Chapter 11), outcome evaluations (Chapter 12), and efficiency
evaluations (Chapter 13).
31
CHAPTER OUTLINE
MYTH
Philosophical Bias
Fear (Evaluation Phobia)
SCOPE OF EVALUATIONS
PERSON-IN-ENVIRONMENT PERSPECTIVE
Example: You’re the Client
PROGRAM-IN-ENVIRONMENT PERSPECTIVE
Example: You’re the Social Worker
RESEARCH ≠ EVALUATION
DATA ≠ INFORMATION
DEFINITION
SUMMARY
One of the great mistakes we make is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their
results.
~ Milton Friedman
32
Chapter
33
1
TOWARD ACCOUNTABILITY
The profession you have chosen to pursue has never been under greater pressure. Our public confidence is
eroding, our funding is diminishing at astonishing rates, and folks at all levels are demanding us to increase
our accountability; the very rationale for our professional existence is being called into question. We’ve entered
a brand new era in which only our best social work programs—those that can demonstrate they provide
needed, useful, and competent client-centered services—will survive.
How do we go about providing these “client-centered accountable services” that will appease our skeptics?
The answer is simple. We utilize the quality improvement process—not only within our individual day-to-day
social work practice activities but also within the very programs in which we work. The evaluation of our
services can be viewed at two basic levels:
In a nutshell, case-level evaluations assess the effectiveness and efficiency of our individual cases while
program-level evaluations appraise the effectiveness and efficiency of the programs where we work.
The goal of the quality improvement process is to deliver excellent social work services, which in turn will lead to
increased accountability.
We must make a commitment to continually look for new ways to make the services we offer our clients
more responsive, effective, and efficient. Quality improvement means that we must continually monitor and
adjust (when necessary) our practices, both at the practitioner level and at the program level.
Case-Level Evaluations
As you know from your previous social work practice courses, it’s at the case level that practitioners provide
direct services to client systems such as individuals, couples, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
At the case level, you simply evaluate your effectiveness with a single client system, or case. It’s at this level
that you will customize your evaluation plans to learn about specific details and patterns of change that are
unique to your specific client system. For example, suppose you’re employed as a community outreach worker
for the elderly and it’s your job to help aging clients remain safely living in their homes as long as possible
before assisted living arrangements are needed.
The support you would provide to an African American male who is 82 years of age with diabetes would
34
likely be different from the support you would provide to an Asian female who is 63 years of age and is
beginning to show signs of dementia. Furthermore, the nature of the services you would provide to each of
these two very different clients would be adjusted depending on how much family support each has, their
individual desires for independent living, their level of receptivity to your services, and other assessment
information that you would gather about both of them. Consequently your plan to evaluate the individualized
services you would provide to each client would, by necessity, involve different measures, different data
collection plans, and different recording procedures.
Program-Level Evaluations
In most instances, social workers help individual clients through the auspices of some kind of a social service
program. It’s rarely the case that they would be self-employed and operating solely on their own to provide
client services. In other words, social service programs generally employ multiple workers, all of whom are
trained and supervised according to the policies and procedures set by the programs in which they work.
Typically, every worker employed by a program is assigned a caseload of clients. Simply put, we can think of
the evaluation of any social service program as an aggregation of its individual client cases; that is, all clients
assigned to every worker in the same program are included in the evaluation. When conducting program-level
evaluations we are mostly interested in the overall characteristics of all the clients and the average pattern of
change for all of them served by a program. We are interested in them as a group, not as individuals. Figure
1.1 illustrates how case- and program-level evaluations are the building blocks of our continued quest to
provide better services for our clients.
The evaluation of a social service program is nothing more than the aggregation of its individual client cases.
As shown in Figure 1.1, the quality improvement process is accomplished via two types of evaluations: case
35
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.