Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project:
Revision:
Date:
Correlations
Positive +
Negative −
No Correlation
Relationships
Strong ● +
Moderate ○ − +
Weak ▽
Direction of Improvement
− − +
− − − +
Maximize ▲
− − − −
Target ◇
− − − − +
Minimize ▼
− − + − − −
Column # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Direction of Improvement ◇ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ Customer Competitive Assesment
Requirements
Customer
Our Product
Requirements
(Explicit and
Row #
Row #
Implicit) 0 1 2 3 4 5
4 |||| 9% 5 9 Comfort
○ ▽ ▽ ● ▽ ▽ ▽ ▽ ○ 5 4 4 4 4 4
8 |||| 9% 5 9 Multifunctional
▽ ▽ ▽ ▽ ▽ ▽ ▽ ● ▽ 4 3 3 3 3 8
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
Our Product
14 14
Competitor #1
Competitor #2
15 15
Competitor #3
16 Competitor #4 16
improve the ergonomics of
multifunctional furniture
sustainable materials by
existing furniture.
easier to follow.
on all furniture
and maintain.
10% per year.
durability
modern.
Target
Max Relationship 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Technical Importance Rating 285,7 257,1 185,7 200 242,9 189,3 157,1 171,4 285,7
Relative Weight 14% 13% 9% 10% 12% 10% 8% 9% 14%
Weight Chart
|||||||
|||||||
||||||
||||||
|||||
||||
||||
||||
|||
Our Product 5 5 5 5 4 3 4 4 5
Competitor #1: Verdant Living 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4
Competitor #2: EcoCraft 3 3 4 4 5 3 3 3 4
Technical Competitive Assesment
Our Product
4
Competitor #1
3
Competitor #2
Competitor #3
2
Competitor #4
1
0