a.No.

Onine End- Term Eaminton (November dio) 21..2o

Paper- Y
Ci Prasedur Lmtaion )

Park-

I. L.boduckio

This b a dut relatny to afearance. arkia

arti
which JA governed y Order C] t e Code o
C pro Cedure,4ot CPc:3.
herelorethe rakts A remedies d e parkses h l be
Qoverred by he rules thereunder. The spedi rde i
qjueshoo a
4ueshion Kule13 Ocder 1% uhidh prouides or .tin
ade o_an ex-pheke decre in Case o Julat Cauya Jhoun

Axy decree an ex-pare de.cree oken patuad aaaint

he delendat m ease his abence, ter procedure
Under Order IRuleS olouded.
While an appeal us 9G Lareview the ex-parte dec
AS allowed we shall analys he tuatid uMIng
e n

qplhetion nder 0 If.R.13 s l e to plead

Cause or on appearenCa etting side ex-parte decre=
a.No.

I . Case Analyais

o maor facts are to e repraluted for his anadupis i

(Y
I.HeiLed the applicaton within te dimtatuwn period
30 days as Case decres as on 35 Novemer 2oi1,
wlereas agpluaton On 2d Decenler o19. LA-tide 123

Latatun At , 1963

2. The accdeat happened on 2Novenberth n

o Juhceat Cause providedor evideaAecordn o

his Cae_laws are elied upon

h Jukt o
su
, G.P. Srvactava v._ K,k. Raizada L2ooo (3) Scc

this Case he apex Court held

that materia date
on- 4pearanCe
or deciding Seat Caue" or
decrea which paua,
ex Parte
was

Only the date on

Lpost Conduat or dealt s irreleja.
Kumar Nadan v. K.N. Supta
Technica Souestien Sa
2.2. Via
iCoo2) scc 30]

t o Aupreme Couct held that aulit

Jn this Cae
o berms the daadant's
Caue Mwt le analye
a-No

The CourE ther went on to hold that. Hayin

Met th ad accideat On day o orte heorina
Constibube God ucient Cause to allow appliatn
Under Oder i Rule i3 Aiica t J i e datart's
nalLby
Thus, in Conclusion due to Y hauing met. wit an acdatL
on 24Nov. 20l, is abseno on the date
the
ex-Parte kearing On 2s NbiWaS t iet Cau
Heca e ex-parke decraa u Jiabla to be et-aide
Lvgaon o ems he Cos dearts gpoit adayer
Droceedi wit te Autrom the date JeortPasing
>uch decaee.
L. Lstroduction

he preseat case denlg Laith a cae Disnis sal

or Deyault o the plainkly Ja Jound Under Order 1Xx
ules 2L3.

Rule peciiolly qraats ploubl te opbin to

le a resh ut or sqe or etiny aide
digmssal.

Further thee art same partleSana Matkers diredly

L Aubstortslldecded theo S. Lka Juduba4plea
 arsdction ke &t, in Csueuc decea.
I . Mantainab.lty

I ote ha the Case waa led arth aga1nst

s
Nirmala by Deeak, kence no optior
old sat Was exertise. retreu

turther,iE noke by the Court JnoFirdous Oner

v.Baasin Chandra Dew cåoa6) 6 SCc G64 that
a_dismss or Mon-appearana o t a decree.
L Ths relied upon by he high Courts n ezIStnt
unsdicton to deriue that "Dismcs or a ut
rdeault does not opezate resudicata
Onderhe Code Ortru adteu |Juts. Vino kurar
V.
aLE KuMar
LAR aol JEK 64
Ths.urther the Jresh Juit i led agast astier
e a r b Lwlide May or May ot be in pocsegion
Qd heAu he úa mantasnaile as at
Nirmaa,u coses due te now tarty
ven othewe,old pat t o be Conaielead
Deogak has to le an appliatue to Aet auide ol decee
Under Kulo 8 29, Houeut,it aqw tat Cauye acto
 Optiona/Remede
Siie
Stie date L not dolwad it belered t
led i month or ari Lirntation penod.
TNicmala s in acbul poszesaio the bt will
Maiotain. turther, Nirmala has to
prove ownershp
by prescriptvon S.27,LimLn tabion Act 1 3 t
Sght denco.
Further, Deepak May dainor a
lenporary uncbon
Under Order pra acie Cate
damage to Popety or trepas is Made ou lam
or Mandabr Tunctio to eiet Ainmala..

hi bec he hay to rdve ko wbeeences weLe

tho nou he s othie Limrpatisn 0A 65
Lineation Act.

Thus, t A t pepcaurly ManAnalle & tiskbs

Ys 5 y le 3ecured damaaes
eclarstion Le tite1L TjunetTou quoyr
e gak
T t a altenat ie Decpak prwing slpeant
Cauae in econd Scenario.
No

6
ntroduboo
Section 2Cc) o the Conmerei Courts Act
Under
any Contract relatng to
Construction
Tagtru kure are Conercial dispuEes
S tOce the MOney o e
kt recoree 3o21o
aCS,espeectviey COetermne s 12]2i henca
Aut or Specped_value L S. 2C) Cneriu
Courts Act CNot Js than 3akha)
wa, CoMmertiCourts hale do lloo proui Si2s
he CPCas amended

Hher ere Aeumg to he a cross-lag

he
aleg
Aut alleging Aimilarlystanding
Mat.amabslt ota suts
1ssueA L thus,
J quostioaab k
u lo the CC
Horeovea an analyis or adInternn Manda toty
launcton also warranbed, which ind geunce
in Order XEKIX t h e CPC la ded).
Pg.No

At tte veryrst stance ut relevart to notte

,
that s 1a-A othe Comnertü Courts Act a u ,
Shall not iutitule a süt wrtout eshous
ti e
eMedy pre-utgation medatsion, Unles Upnturpat rel
ee
Manda ted. Thus, buts Connot procaod prima oacue ale
he ercontion U r s t

L Kes Sel -Tudice

Any Au aris . Ow me Cauye act ton ruttes
whch
hch Mau attu e yed as res udota are

Thelqste ohe bult tad -ektimrye Case

intanmCon cluion Hormer
ormer dtLntiete)
arer
The qirth
he girm h pothotics Cae ia mdarto tha one
Jo GupbeCardjac Care Centre V. Dumpic Pharma
Care AR Sc a42
where One Suit clamed recoreyor Monay4
Qaother git chIne amouat alleged aouh udnj

w a hel thatt Unce uts arue

oM 9ee_ftnsacton ee JA On Cauue
acklop LSuOsSuOs aruin deto,inahn
e Same
Po

DeCree DAL wouwd Jond to

dsm in aue
hee would be duplean Quence, arsunerts
Leven Coun ber inturtive exerse Thus r e e Caurt
aeate hat prior r t i Mainable
L ta
utter Jut u u le trarauadStayed
S.lo Cec a
u-Taoico.
Thid
Thi alyo aplet
his Caue ueto Sare
rsactlon henCe Jeepakukals ut t o
Je uJudcad alei Jrrfe hente en
he aplich oLd kdnde

Rouere aRuMa heo have Feen ale Medahm

FstMate St LHt Trarae Satea ce cal
then aa appliatn or ad- Iatecin Mardator
hunchon Can dis cuses only On t h
oLABurpEn erets

AnHa-ttrn madortory junctin a tempoauy

nctim Drdeu to do omewn ohle *hë
Aut pendin0 Orderelby ke Court
okrgora) nature 44 goresned by
Order KxxIx h e CPC
AAy Ad-Scin lnjunct on
Cond tuOnd ae Met
qranted on uke tau

OA prinaatie Cose to gofon trd

Baance Conwenen ce
re eralle Joss ur

Kash ina Sensthan v. Stina SJLd

Swam LATR Aoo SC 2U

Under Ne hexe has to be otice ven

A t
s Scenario o that epaikls t
alouedLCGAsideriig urgent relidureuenn
Conmercial Couts_ee Cet
NS Mk Foad V.
S H. Fod aoo
Telangana HC

Thouolert Deegsh kh in adh to atore 3

Condita alao haa to don zent

J Jdtted hat d the Orea

aMbust i etofued e Cougt My Oder
to Contirue Condtryct abaurth à Aandato
dnincton Jeealle Harm esene
aNo.
Topic
(1
Ae mauy e oeeme0
Circmyancad art
ar
kw proedurlly elatun on- Maunrule
Adec S.lo. Howee Court edmts i 2 hrehd
Sharios chm Ma erated.

Park-A
T.ntducaoa
A amendmert o Ha plaut Plednaa/
-
w rten
mRSiOA u grated bg ao Appliatón Crda
Srder T Role 11_ t h e CPC

The olyplag whoe applushnd ane nst alloued

a f t a Trial has Comrencad olaich haspens ol

Futherlo 17 sug2a t that lourt 1

may grant
a gran
Suth aa Qgplotm OA
behen
delemintre Guuastus Contrortuy
arties.
No

IFacts
Cae V.ks LOolndont]st
Me prceat.
Ocepted that he s a TeanZadn. tted
V.kam'sLflauwhye SubhisiorA
Re durin
Cyplah Nor
aamend dent Atage
to Say he r t
Tenunt h adrele possekion
Henc he_armerdmet o ror Contrdickory duns
dlndaat.

h the Cae o Heamlal V. Kalyan Mal CR J Sce

278
t hld that Gny aned mentTegardles e
the s t a , whith eaue prtudice to plan tsy s
to plaua

Caye MUt not be allouwed as a mocdte

Oscietion
FurHer Aldul kekaga v. Mohd.Rulde LaT 2.) SCan
Jtlans helo that e preyudua pay e
0yor104AEICosts.
N
12

>Lastl in Concluion, the Spreme Court 1 n

a l also averte that Ca Se hat
dalend ant has ade admiSS Dns in
avour
ptaint a hey Cnrot be otdrawn du
aUbin preudica
Thus, in q i Gralyau pplicat t
be dmuted RoereA, s Ordica Couek
ehe Court moy e Jlkel in accechna t e
Seme
Th in lght dcrehanA Powey Cot
aRAR Mala-de intertion' or blunder. Lo
mue le balmced tdeslt shousD le resectd.
Accete Lort CostEs to plaint

LMahla anka Dev v. Nandram Caols)u3 SCCI32.

Pa No.
(3
I. atroduenan
AnsaUader S.a and .
the umtaton period
tha umtateon act
Maye reueed in oye
acknaledgpmontPaymest
nart & hen Umtutm rekod
det ackrouledgd
reasere
accordin
Oer Arbde 31h he imten Ac 146 3, he
promssor 0ote yarts Jinmbzbn rom the eid
when it stars tole dua L u dor a
pesiod 3years
The
Tke eerbs Us 1q2 18 oaly aply where tere
Jan ac knowledapd Payertdo rtin er Siznad
bycha0eAbbn ma&Ai the MOAt
WMout Sgnatueexenptn not to e clained.

a i d R hoo to Y towards fromisso ste re

SWmeat oLumtaten period. o meatin

ackaouledypn yno or otlerwe.

Thu , wo Sceario cde dor analuau.

1 OCIC

i.naye
.not thes her i o acknouledagnnt
LKence exemfhm Cannst e Claues.hup aston
wnake AclknouledgesmendMede in wrt2
e come tlerantOtkew aumot nst
xempted

Shanti CoAcluctors v. Aaarn SEB|Cao)2 SC

677
Tu, prima acie ratan perio uls 48-2o not
Qxepted
Hoere Jn Gomg CaR, the ua rechmhp
eltor Cred ibor S to bee depicted hud,
ThOARwa any Atsdemet written by X ckntes
proMISo ote Or
Chargg nto loushmor AMout 6,000 Nwly
yned on ut May aMOUt to aknouledggmes
JurdJurd rtbk as promiSsorAotes us the
Negstule strrot s Act 1&1 &dne as ote
+o Sum."
cte 1sdChanj Made it M aMout t
acknotled gument Jual Relationshp.
fod Corte Tda V. teson Stsde Cap.
Loou) 12 SCC 366
aNo Topic

Thua, ideallu the dmtruen cld not epend

Unless te Same i duy ack nouledags Changa
Aousd earer proMI`sor Mte