Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Adam Jon Feliz Miranda - 9-Sieve Analysis of Aggregates - 01-26-24
Adam Jon Feliz Miranda - 9-Sieve Analysis of Aggregates - 01-26-24
Experiment No. 9
I. INTRODUCTION
2
II. MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT
The lists of the materials and equipment used in the experiment are as follows:
Apparatus:
➢ Sampling spoon
➢ Weighing Scale
Materials:
➢ Sand
3
The main apparatus and materials utilized in this experiment, especially the set of
sieves and sand all adhere to the ASTM C33: Standard Specification for Concrete
Aggregates and ASTM C136: Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and
Coarse Aggregates.
4
III. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
mechanical sieve analysis, the group followed a meticulous procedure that assures
accurate and credible results. The experiment was conducted with the proper
guidance from our professor and is in line with the ASTM C136 standard test methods.
➢ By using a dry mixing bowl, 1000 grams of sand must be obtained and
Sieving Process
➢ Stack the sieves from sieve #3/8 to sieve #200 and include the pan at the very
bottom.
5
➢ Pour the 1000 grams of fine aggregate sample (sand) into the top sieve.
➢ Load and secure the set of sieves in the mechanical sieve shaker and shake for
5 minutes.
➢ After sieving, weight each sieve with the retained sand in them.
➢ Subtract the result obtained with the sieves' corresponding tare weights
➢ Add the cumulative percent retained from sieve #3/8 to sieve #100 only
➢ Divide the sum to 100 as per the given formula during the class lecture and
6
RESULTS
4 0g 0% 100 % 95-100 MS
MS – Met Standards
NMS – Not Met Standards
7
IV. DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION
mechanical sieve analysis, only one trial was conducted. This allowed the group to
reveal and obtain insightful information that puts theories learned from the class in
The results obtained from the sieve analysis test showed that the 1000-gram
sample of sand is mostly composed of smaller and finer particle sizes. It can also be
percent retained between the #30 and #50 sieves. The data indicates that over 83%
of the material was retained between the #3/8 and #50 sieves, and 98% between the
#3/8 and #100 sieves. This finding suggests that a significant portion of the sample
is composed of particles that fall into the fine sand category, specifically between 0.3
With the Fineness Modulus of the sample aggregate at 2.6645, it can be said that
the sample aggregates passed the specified standards of the fineness modulus of fine
aggregates both from the class lecture and from the ASTM C33 which were: "The
Fineness Modulus of fine aggregates should not exceed 3." and "The Fineness
Modulus of fine aggregates should be not less than 2.3 nor more than 3.1.",
respectively.
8
V. CONCLUSION
obtaining the fineness modulus of fine aggregates through sieve analysis test. The
passing of the fine aggregate sample's fineness modulus to specified standards raises
The sample was mechanically sieved via a stack of sieves in accordance with
ASTM C136, which successfully accomplished the experiment's primary objective. The
aggregate sample's fineness modulus of 2.6645 indicates that its main components
are fine sand particles, according to the results. Also, to mention, a large proportion
of the fine sample aggregates were retained on the smaller sieve sizes. This indicates
that the aggregates are suitable for enhancing cohesion by filling up spaces between
coarser particles.
concrete technology that provides civil engineers with the necessary information to
design and produce concrete mixes tailored to specific project requirements. It plays
a central role in achieving the desired properties of fresh and hardened concrete,
9
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS
detailed below to enhance and improve the accuracy and efficiency of the
Shaker's limited capacity it was not suited to support the whole set of sieves
from sieve #3/8 to sieve #200, with this sieves #3/8, #4, and #8 were
and sieve #4, it is still optimal to use a mechanical sieve share for a more
uniform process.
➢ Reduce the aggregate sample: This can prevent overloading on the sieves'
capacity. However, the sample should still meet the minimum standards
10
VII. REFERENCES
❖ ASTM C33
❖ ASTM C136
https://doi.org/10.24321/2456.9925.202201
❖ The Constructor. (2016, July 31). What is Fineness Modulus of Sand (Fine
https://theconstructor.org/practical-guide/fineness-modulus-of-sand-
calculation/12465/
11