Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Galagar-Bsece1a) Ge Hist - Mod 1-Assessment-Taskco-At1
(Galagar-Bsece1a) Ge Hist - Mod 1-Assessment-Taskco-At1
Introduction:
Seventy-five years ago, Japan’s grip upon the empire she had so violently assembled
began to fail and officially surrendered aboard the USS Missouri in Tokyo Bay on September 2,
1945. The 23-minute ceremony ended the Pacific war, which had started on December 7, 1941,
when Pearl Harbor was bombed. It also ended nearly four bitter years of Japanese occupation in
the Philippines—a war that shattered the Pearl of the Orient and killed approximately one million
civilians. But today not many people know of the tremendous sacrifices of the Filipinos during
World War II. The Liberation of the Philippines in 1945 marked a crucial turning point in
Philippine history, signifying the end of Japanese occupation and the restoration of Filipino
sovereignty. This essay embarks on a comparative analysis, juxtaposing primary and secondary
Thesis-Statement
By examining primary sources such as eyewitness accounts, military reports, and official
documents from the Liberation period, alongside secondary sources encompassing historical
analyses, scholarly critiques, and academic treatises, this essay aims to elucidate the complexities
and significance of the Liberation of the Philippines in 1945. Through a nuanced exploration of
convergences and divergences within these sources, we can attain a deeper understanding of this
pivotal moment in Philippine history. The Liberation period was one of the most thrilling
episodes of the struggles of Filipinos to restore and preserve their sovereignty. War historians
claim that the two years from 1944-1946 were the most dramatic part in Philippine history. It
was the period when Filipinos showed their determination to take back their independence which
had they lost, by sheer gallantry and courage through the guerilla warfare that they waged.
Analysis
During the Liberation of the Philippines in 1945, both primary and secondary sources
share several commonalities that contribute to our understanding of this pivotal moment in
Philippine history:
• Both the personal stories and the expert writings help us understand what happened during the
Liberation of the Philippines in 1945. They tell us about the battles, the challenges people faced,
• They also show us the impact of the Liberation on Philippine society. The personal stories give
us a close-up view of how people felt and what they went through, while the expert writings help
us see the bigger picture and understand why the Liberation was so important.
• Even though they're different, both types of sources work together to give us a complete picture
of what happened during this important time in Philippine history. In the end, by looking at both
the personal stories and the expert explanations, we gain a deeper understanding of the
Liberation of the Philippines in 1945 and the lasting impact it had on our country.
Differences Between Primary and Secondary Sources:
Differences between primary and secondary sources in relation to the Liberation of the
Philippines in 1945:
• Primary Sources: These are things like personal stories, letters, photos, or official reports that
were made during the actual Liberation of the Philippines. They're like direct records of what
• Secondary Sources: These are written after the Liberation, based on primary sources. They
include books, articles, or documentaries made by people who studied what happened during the
Liberation.
Primary sources give us a close-up look at what happened during the Liberation, while
secondary sources help us understand the bigger picture and why it matters. Both are important
for understanding history, but they tell us different things and are useful in different ways.
Alternating Points:
Primary Sources: Personal accounts and photographs vividly depict the hardships
endured by Filipinos during the Japanese occupation and the joy of liberation.
Secondary Sources: Historians analyze these primary sources to understand the broader societal
Primary Sources: Personal diaries and letters reflect individual experiences and emotions, which
Secondary Sources: Historians provide a critical analysis of primary sources, accounting for bias
Applying the alternating method to understand the Liberation of the Philippines in 1945, we look
at personal stories and photos from the time, alongside expert writings that explain what
happened. This method helps us understand how important the Liberation was for the Philippines
In conclusion, studying both primary and secondary sources about the Liberation of the
Philippines in 1945 helps us better understand our country's past. By examining each topic
separately and then comparing them, we piece together the puzzle of history to see the whole
picture. This method not only teaches us about the past events but also highlights the courage
and sacrifices of Filipinos during that time. Ultimately, it underscores the importance of
remembering and honoring our heritage. In short, using the block method reveals more details
about our history and highlights the lasting impact of the Liberation on our country's identity.
References
christopher F.B.. (2020). The liberation period in the philippines. 58. Retrieved from:
https://www.coursehero.com/file/p2djf9b/The-Liberation-Period-in-the-Philippines-The-
Liberation-period-was-one-of-the/
Connaughton, R. (1996). The War in the Pacific: The Liberation of Manila 1945 – A Philippine
Perspective. 46-47. Retrieved from:
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-349-24725-7_3
Alvarez, C. (2023). Differences Between a Primary and Secondary Source. Retrieved from:
https://www.wgu.edu/blog/what-difference-between-primary-secondary-
source2304.html#:~:text=Differences%20Between%20a%20Primary%20and%20Secondary
%20Source&text=The%20most%20significant%20difference%20between,and%20commentary%20from
%20other%20researchers.