ASSIGNMENT REPORT

MARKING RUBRICS
No. Items Description Marks Total

1 Introduction Clear information about the history of the

founder and the business, nature of business 4-5
and the products and services rendered.
Information about the history of the founder
and the business, nature of business and the
2-3
products and services rendered provided but /5
lack explanation.
Lack of information or irrelevant information
were provided. 0-1
Company Poster Clearly represent the company’s identity with
appropriate and relevant information. Great
4-5
balance of text (font & colour), figures and
space. Original work by group.
Able to represent the company’s identity, but
having incomplete information. Slight
2-3 /5
imbalance in the use of text, figures and space.
Original work by group.
Lack of information in representing the
company’s identity, major imbalance in the
use of text, figures and space. More than 50% 0-1
of the poster is not originally done by group.
2 Planning and Strategic Correctly stated the strategy(s) with clear and
Management sufficient example(s) based on the company. 8 - 10
(i) Basic Strategies
Correctly stated the strategy(s) with clear but
insufficient example(s) based on the 4-7 /10
company.
Incorrectly stated the strategy or general
examples were provided. 0-3
(ii) SWOT Analysis Ideas are organised; well structured;
(5m x 4 demonstrated full knowledge; applied critical 4-5
components=20m) thinking skills.
Ideas are organised; well structured;
2-3
demonstrated full knowledge. /20
Ideas are not organised; brief or no
explanation. 0-1

(iii) Grand Strategy Correctly stated the strategy with clear and
4-5
sufficient example(s) based on the company.
Correctly stated the strategy with clear but
insufficient example(s) based on the 2-3 /5
company.
Incorrectly stated the strategy or general
examples were provided. 0-1
(iv) Competitive Correctly stated the strategy(s) with clear and
8 - 10
Strategies sufficient example(s) based on the company.
Correctly stated the strategy(s) with clear but
insufficient example(s) based on the 4-7
company. /10
Incorrectly stated the strategy(s) or general
examples were provided. 0 -3
3 Recommendation Ideas are organised; well structured; 8 - 10 /10
(i) Utilization of the demonstrated full knowledge; applied critical
Strength and thinking skills.
 Opportunities Ideas are organised; well structured;
4-7
demonstrated full knowledge.
Ideas are not organised; brief or no
0-3
explanation.
(ii) Overcome the Ideas are organised; well structured;
Weaknesses and demonstrated full knowledge; applied critical 8 - 10
Threats thinking skills.
Ideas are organised; well structured; /10
4-7
demonstrated full knowledge.
Ideas are not organised; brief or no
0-3
explanation.
4 Conclusion Correctly commented on organisation’s overall
achievements, well-structured and explained; 8 - 10
applied critical thinking skills.
Correctly commented on organisation’s overall /10
4-7
achievements, well-structured and explained.
Vaguely commented on organisation’s overall
0-3
achievements.
5 References and Correctly stated and presented the references
Appendices and appendices in an orderly manner; well- 4-5
structured
Correctly stated and presented the references
2-3 /5
and appendices in an orderly manner.
Incorrectly stated or presented the references
and appendices without proper order, or 0-1
incomplete.
6 Peer Evaluation Properly done with points and comments given
3
to each member.
Points were given but comments were not /3
2
provided.
Incomplete or empty forms submitted. 1
7 Formatting  Font and Size: Times New Roman,
12
 1.5 spacing on A4 size paper
 Justified (Alignment)
 Page number 7 /7
 Less than 15 pages
 Language and spelling
 Content page, standard cover page,
marking Scheme
Total /100

Overall comments:

_______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________
 GROUP PRESENTATION MARKING RUBRICS

Tutorial Group: T__

Company Name: ________________

No UTAR ID Group Member’s Name Total Mark

1
2
3
4 /50
5
6

CRITERIA VERY GOOD MODERATE POOR VERY

GOOD POOR
5 4 3 2 1
Main ideas are Present all the Present all the Present most of Present Present
presented in a information in information in the information some information
clear and good order and order and the in order information out of order
orderly the audience can audience can in order
manner understand the understand the
order order
5 4 3 2 1
Content of Exceptional use The content is The content is The content Content is
presentation of information clear, and clear but is a little unclear and
that relates to many relevant supporting unclear and information
presentation and points and information is supporting appears
abundance of supporting disconnected information randomly
supported information is chosen
materials are connected disconnected
5 4 3 2 1
Visual aids / Exceptional Some apparent Material Material Delivery is
Creativity originality of originality is presented with presented repetitive
presented displayed moderate with little with no
material and through the interpretation or interpretatio variety in
interpretation use of original originality n or presentation
interpretation originality technique
of presented
materials
5 4 3 2 1
Overall Attire is Business attire Casual business Casual Attire is
grooming appropriate for but no attire with a business inappropriat
the type of cohesion professional attire but e for
presentation. among look. somewhat presentation.
Business attire members. wrinkled and Attire may
with a sleek wore sports be too
professional shoes. revealing.
look and For example,
cohesion among jeans, a t-
members. shirt, and
miniskirts.
5 4 3 2 1
Loud, clear Exceptional Good Moderate Poor Monotone.
voice and good articulation, articulation, articulation, articulation, Presenters
language Presenters used Presenters Presenters used Presenters used
the best used correct correct sentence used incorrect
structure that sentence structure that incorrect sentence
supported the structure that was moderately sentence structures
topic, and no was appropriate in structure that that
slang/reduction appropriate in supporting the was most supported
was used supporting the topic, no appropriate the topic,
topic, and no slang/reduction in and slang
slang/reductio was used supporting /reduction
n was used the topic, was very
and often used.
slang/reducti
on was used.
5 4 3 2 1
Body language Exceptional Good eye Moderate eye Little eye The speaker
and eye contact confidence with contact, but contact, contact, fast seemed
with the the material, eye lack of speaking rate, speaking uninterested
audience contact & confidence and expression rate, little in material
enthusiasm with the expression
material & mumbling
5 4 3 2 1
Able to Engage the Engage the Moderate Little Did not
maintain the audience and audience and attempt to attempt to attempt to
interest of the held their held their engage the engage the engage the
audience attention most attention most audience audience audience
of the time of the time by
throughout with remaining on
a creative and topic
focused
presentation
5 4 3 2 1
Time Presented within Remain close Moderately Exceeding Greatly
management the allotted time to the allotted close to the or falling exceeding or
time allotted time short of the falling short
allotted time of the
allotted time
5 4 3 2 1
Q&A session Give well- Give well- Explain but not Answer with Fail to
constructed constructed properly a “Yes” or answer the
responses with response but constructed “No” question at
confidence and with some without all
agreement with disagreement proper
all members and lack of explanation
confidence or
elaboration
5 4 3 2 1
The group has Completely Seemed Somewhat Somewhat Seemed not
adequately prepared and prepared but prepared but prepared but at all
prepared and has rehearsed might have might have rehearsed is prepared to
practiced the needed a needed a couple lacking present
presentation couple more more rehearsal
rehearsal
 PEER EVALUATION FORM

Write the name of your group members according to alphabetical order. Please
evaluate the other members of your group using the following scale:
Effort contribution matrix [Marks range from 1 (lowest score) to 5 (highest score)]

1: Very poor; unacceptable performance - Consistently failed to show up or complete

assignments and was unprepared.
2: Less than acceptable performance - Often did what he/she was supposed to do,
minimally prepared and cooperative.
3: Average performance - Usually did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptable
prepared, and cooperative.
4: Good performance - Consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, very well
prepared and cooperative.
5: Excellent performance - Consistently went above and beyond-tutored teammates,
and carried more than his/her fair share of the load.

Evaluators Group Group Group Group Group Group

Names Member (1) Member (2) Member (3) Member (4) Member (5) Member (6)
of members being
evaluated
1 nil
2 nil
3 nil
4 nil
5 nil
6 nil
Comments on the member
being evaluated
(if any)
 CENTRE FOR FOUNDATION STUDIES
(KAMPAR CAMPUS)

FHBM1114
MANAGEMENT

TRIMESTER 202401

Lecturer
Your Lecturer Name

Prepared by:
We declare that this assignment is an original work submitted by the following group members
who have all actively contributed. Any other work of a similar nature has been appropriately
referenced in this assignment. We are fully aware that students who are suspected of violating
this pledge are liable to be referred to the Examination Disciplinary Committee of the
University.

Tutorial
No UTAR ID Name
Group
1
2
3
4
5
6

Total Marks
/100 marks
[Assignment Report]