Assignment-1

Subject: Human Resource Management in Aviation

Course Code: AM322
Institute of Aviation Studies (IAS)
University of Management & Technology (UMT)

Due: 3 Nov 2022 till 1415 Total Marks: 20 Taeget CLO: 3 Domain & Level: C4

General Instructions:

1. You will work in same groups that you made for your Semester Project.
2. Marking will be on individual basis. So, in your report, write the name and ID of the
student before the start of his/her work.
3. Each student should use at least 1 in-text-citation in his/her part of the assignment. Use
APA style formatting for this.

Your Report Should Cover:

1. Brief overview of the company that you selected for your Semester Project.
2. Analyze the company and find at least 5 different HR strategies or practices to
promote diversity and inclusion in that company.
3. If it does not exist in your selected company then use the benchmarking technique and
suggest 5 different strategies or practices to its HR Head to incorporate diversity and
inclusion.

Structure of Report

1. Use Times New Roman 12 font size with line spacing of 1.5 and justify from both
sides.
2. Maximum word limit: 2000
3. Rubric for marking is attached in Appendix I.
4. Layout of the cover page: See Appendix II.
 Appendix - I
Rubric for Assignment
Dimensions/ Does Not Meet Expectations
Weight (1-3 points)
Fails to provide an overview
Overview and define the scope of the
10% work. Fails to give any sense
of purpose.
Concepts, Confused about assignment
Reasoning and relevant concepts. Lack
30% of support for main points.
Illogical presentation of
ideas.
Analysis and/or sources of
Soundness, information are either not
Relevance 30% clearly specified, or not
reliable, and/or not relevant
to the assignment.
Meets Expectations
(4-7 points)
Provides an adequate
overview, a general
explanation on the scope of
the work, and gives a
reasonable sense of purpose.
Main concepts and ideas are
visible but not always logical
and/or too broad. Support for
main points is given but not
always sufficient and/or
focused.
Sufficient information and/or
analysis is given but results
are not always credible,
reliable, and/or relevant to the
assignment.
Exceeds Expectations
Score
(8-10 points)
Provides an engaging
overview, thoroughly defines
the scope of the work, and
gives a clear sense of
purpose.
Ideas and concepts are
logical and work together as
a unified whole. Main points
are supported with specific
evidence.
All necessary analysis and/or
sources of information are
clearly stated. All results and
references are valid, reliable,
specific and relevant to the
assignment.

Most of the directions are

Directions are not followed
and/or work is incomplete
Completeness and does not address one or
20% more of the points necessary
to treat the given topic.
Ideas are unrefined and/or
Originality
fail to demonstrate
10%
independent and critical
thinking.
Total 100%
followed and most parts of Followed all directions and
the assignment are addressed. responded to all parts of the
Work covers most of the assignment. Work is self-
stated scope and is contained and complete with
reasonably respect to the stated scope.
self-contained and
complete.
Some ideas display capability
Content clearly displays
of independent and critical
evidence of independent
thinking or perspective.
and critical thinking.
Content Criteria
Appendix - II