You are on page 1of 4

Fau 1t id ent i ficati on during power swings with syminet r ica1 coiiipoiient

Q.X.Yang* Z.Y.Xu* L.L.Lai Z.H.Zhang* N Rajkumar

Sifang Protectin & Control Ltd * Energy Systems Group


Beijing, Qinhe, Shaiigde 100085 City University, London
P.R.China UK

swings and the faults according to the


characteristics which appeared on oscillographs.
Abstract: This paper presents a novel They can estimate whether the impedance
protection scheme during power siving trajectory sway into the operating characteristics
blocking. The blocked protective relays will be or not. This paper uses fuzzy set approach to
released when the system restores to its normal describe the characteristics of faults which
operating conditions. The protection scheme is occur during power swings, and to simulate the
based on symmetrical components. EMTP mechanism for protection specialists identify the
simulation results show the proposed scheme in power swings and faults. After identifying the
this paper are quite suitable for modern digital unbalanced faults, the protection will be
based protective relays. Examples are shown for released to clear such kind of faults. The more
unbalanced fault cases. obvious the fault characteristics appear, the
quicker the faults can be identified and cleared.
Key words: Power swing, unbalanced faults,
high resistance fault. This paper presents the results of EMTP
simulation for unbalanced faults. The single
INTRODUCTION phase to ground fault resistance is up to 200Q.
The results of those simulations support the
Distance relays are easily affected by poLver conclusion that the scheme is good to identify
swings. In general, the traditional power swing the various faults from power swings, especially
blocking scheme which is widely used in for high resistance faults.
Europe or U.S.A [ I ] can distinguish between the
power swings and faults. But it presents some FUZZY SET
difficulties during fast power swings. The
distance relays often mal-function under these The fuzzy set idea allows us to present
conditions. Meanwhile the blocked protecti1.e relationship sets with membership functions.
relays will fail-to-trip any internal faults 1s hich Those membership function sets can be handled
occur during power swing blocking state. with fuzzy logic. In general, the fuzzy set
relationships are described as follows:
In recent years some new points of view are
If: x: x-

-
published in literature. Reference [2] proposes a [0,1], (la?
power swing blocking method by identifying the
voltage phase angle. References [ 3 ] and [-I] Y: Y [0,1], (lb?
have made use of the rate of resistance change.
All these methods seem hardly to use in actual Then the fuzzy relationship is defined as:
protective relays for eliv/uhv transmission lines.

A fault characteristic identification scheme


based on symmetrical components is presented The fuzzy relationship equation can be
in this paper. in practice it has been found that expressed in different forms. The fuzzy
the protection specialists can identify the pon er

IEEE Catalogue No: 98EXI37


0-7803-4495-2/98/$10.001998 IEEE 108
intcgration based on mas-min approach is used PROPOSED SCHEME
i n this paper.
Froin the above reason, it leads to the following
UNBALANCED FAULTS two procedures.
IDENTIFICATION
PO > A1 , unblock the zero-sequence
The zero-sequence protective relays and protection with and without communication
negative-sequence protective relays with and chan ne I s.
without communication channels can be used to
clear the various Linbalanced faults during pl > A I . unblock tlie negative-sequence
power swings. In general, tlie operation of protection with and without communication
zero-sequence protective relays will not be cli anne 1s.
influenced by power swings. As the potver
frequency varies, the CT, PT errors will make Where A1 is the threshold of p0 and pl
tlie zero-sequence protective relays and tlie
negative-sequence protective relays sometimes For A I is 0.25, from experience, with the fuzzy
false-to-trip during power swings. integration approach, PO and p 1 will provide
enough sensitivity to high resistance faults.
A ssuine :
The scheme logic is described in fig. (2) below.
pO= iO/il , pl =i2/il

where io, i l , i2 are the zero-sequence, p0sitiL.e- Begin


sequence and negative-sequence currents
respectively.

The PO and pl values are used to identify


various unbalanced faults from power swings.
When unbalanccd fault characteristics are
identified the corresponding protections are
released fast to clear the faults.

Fig. (1) shows the PO , pl membership function.


Here Z means few, MS means middle &
smaller, B means bigger. There is an obvious
boundary between tlie Z and MS set. In tlie
above membership function there is an I unblock nezitive-seauence protection II
uncrossed blank space between the Z and MS
end k- +
set boundary. This point of view has been
proven by simulation results.
Fig. (2) Flow Chart of the scheme

Fig.( ) Membel-ship function for unbalanced


faults

109
SYSTEM CONFIGURATION
8 ,

EMTP simulations are carried out for a t>,pical 6


500kV Chinese system as shown in Fig. (3). The Yn 4
system consists of a turbo generator suppll ing - 2
I-
power to an infinite busbar via a S Y f 0
transformer. The length of the transmission line 33 -2
is 370 kin. U -4
-6
Line I -a

dIF1 line I1 - 3
fF2 e (a) TIME ( sec.)

Zm M zF3 NI
I .
I
Fig. ( 3 ) A typical 500kV Chinese system

The simulation system parameters are as


follows:

Zm = j24 R- j 12402; ( include the parameters


of the generator and the transformer ) (b) TIME (sec.)
21 = 0.027 + j0.286 0 /kin;
ZO = 0.163 +j0.843 R /hn; Fig. (4) p0 and pl values during power swings
C1 = 0.0136pfk.m; with 10% CT unbalance
CO = 0.0091 p f h ;

The relay is located in M bus of transmission


line I, and a disturbance is created with a three
phase to ground fault in line 11. Such
disturbance will cause power swings when the
faulted line I1 is disconnected at the bus
terminals. During power swings an unbalanced
fault occurs in FI or F2 of transmission line I.
F1, F3 are located at 5% of the total length line Fig. (5) PO and p l values during power swings
I from M bus, while F2 is 90% from M bus.

SIMULATION RESULTS
2.5 1
Fig. (4) shows a current swing waveform for the 2
simulation system as shown in Fig. (3) and Fig.
(4b) shows the corresponding PO, p l values 1.5
during power swings with 10% CT unbalance.
Fig. ( 5 ) shows the PO, p l values without any
CT's unbalance during power swings which are
1
0.5 t
T
0
caused by a delay in clearing three phase fault
in line I1 of the simulation system. It can be
seen that under power swing conditions and
without any faults, the values of PO, p l are very
small. However, CT unbalance will increase the Fig. (6) p0 and pl values for a single
value of p0 and pl . phase to ground fault

110
analyses”, 1EE International Conference on
Advances in Power System Control,
Operation and Fvlanagenient, Nov 1991.
HOng Kong, pp.843-847.
[4]J. Machowski and D. Nelles, “New power
swing blockiiig method” Proceedings of the
International Con Ference on Developments
in Power System Protection, IEE, March,
g
-0.12 kio 6 s
~ % ~6 so 6 g6 s$ 6 o6 ~ g o1997,~ pp.2 18-22 1.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z
Fig. (7) PO and pl values for a single phase to
ground fault with fault resistance of
200a

Fig. (6) shows the B phase to ground faults with


10Q resistance at fault point F2. Fig. (7) shous
A phase to ground fault with a fault resistance
of 200R. The fault point is at F2. It can be seen
that PO, p l are greater than that of the power
swings. Also it appears that PO and pl are
highly sensitive to high resistance faults during
power swings.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper proposes a novel scheme using i2/i I ,


iO/i 1 to identify unbalanced faults during power
swings. i2 and io are sensitive to high
resistance fau 1ts.

From the studies presented, it is evident that


the technique demonstrates the remarkable
identification properties for unbalanced faults
during power swings. EMTP simulations show
that the new scheme described here is suitable
for power system protection during power
swings.

REFERENCES

[ 11 E. Clarke, “Impedance seen by relays during


power swings with and without faults”,
AIEE Trans. Vol. 64, 1945, pp372-384.
[2] A. Mechraoui, D.W.P Thomas, “A new
blocking principle with phase and earth fault
detection during fast power swings blocking
scheme for distance protection.”, IEEE
Trans. on delivery, Vol. IO, No. 3, July, 1995,
pp. 1242-1 248.
[3] Z.D. Gad, G.B. Wang, “A new power sw.ing
block in distance protection based on a
microcoinputer principle and performance

111

You might also like