You are on page 1of 4

Ship Name Rank Question NQuestion Text

ONE HAWK Master 2.3.5 Had the vessel been enrolled in a Cl


ONE HAWK Master 2.3.5 Had the vessel been enrolled in a Cl
ONE HAWK Master 2.3.5 Had the vessel been enrolled in a Cl
ONE HAWK Master 2.3.5 Had the vessel been enrolled in a Cl
BELFORTE Master 2.5.1 Had the company Management of Change
BELFORTE Master 2.5.1 Had the company Management of Change
BELFORTE Master 2.5.1 Had the company Management of Change
BELFORTE Master 2.5.1 Had the company Management of Change
Observation Hardware Process
The information provided by the operator in the pre-inspection questionnaire was inaccurate.
The vessel operator had claimed a CAP rating for modules thatdfewf dsf
The date of the CAP survey was inaccurately declared as the CAP certificate issuedsf
The There
operator
wasdid
nonot uploadMOC
company the CAP certificate
procedure to thechanges
covering document store and
affecting classthe Csfd flag regulated structure, machinery and e
and/or
Changes falling within the scope of this question to vesselok
structure, machinery or equipment, regulated by class and/or fl

The accompanying senior officer was unfamiliar with the company MOC process, as it applied to changes falling within the sco
Human

wd
ok
equipment, regulated by class and/or flag, had been conducted within the previous twelve months but had not been declared on the pre-i

pplied to changes falling within the scope of this question, to structure, machinery and equipment onboard the vessel.
ad not been declared on the pre-inspection questionnaire.

rd the vessel.

You might also like