“I must say that even a cursory examination of Mr Stevenson’s statement reveals the

totally untenable nature of the position taken by the United States government on the
question which it has thought necessary to place before the Council, amid its
complete inability to defend this position in the Council and before world public
opinion…

Yesterday, the United States Government placed the Republic of Cuba under a virtual
naval blockade. Insolently flouting the rules of international conduct and the
principles of the Charter, the United States has arrogated to itself the right to attack
the ships of other states on the high seas, which is nothing less than undisguised
piracy.

At the same time, the landing of additional United States troops has begun at the
United States Guantanamo base in Cuban territory, and the United States armed
forces are being placed in a state of combat readiness.

The present aggressive actions of the United States of America against Cuba
represent a logical stage in that aggressive policy, fraught with the most serious
international consequences, which the United States began to pursue towards Cuba in
the days of the Eisenhower Administration and which has been continued and
intensified by the present United States government…

The falsity of the charges now levelled by the United States against the Soviet Union,
which consist in the allegation that the Soviet Union has set up offensive weapons in
Cuba, is perfectly clear from the start. The Soviet delegation hereby officially
confirms the statements already made by the Soviet Union in this connexion, to the
effect that the Soviet government has never sent and is not now sending offensive
weapons of any kind to Cuba.”
Identify practical measures and cooperation efforts to enhance nuclear security, strengthen non-
proliferation norms, and promote disarmament initiatives.

Discuss potential security guarantees and assurances that could be provided to stakeholders to
support a peaceful resolution of the crisis.

Delve into the historical context of Cuba's militarization, examining the evolution of its military
capabilities since the Bay of Pigs invasion.

Strategies to Safeguard Interests Amidst the Cuban Missile Crisis: Addressing Regional Stability,
Economic Security, and Diplomatic Channels"

M;

Mistakes during Cuban missile crisis

As two countries proceed up an escalatory ladder, mistakes become increasingly
likely — as the Cuban missile crisis made clear. In a conventional war, it is possible
for political leaders to make significant mistakes and for the human race to survive,
battered but intact. In a nuclear standoff, even a minor misunderstanding or
miscommunication can have catastrophic consequences.

In October 1962, it was President John Kennedy who declared a naval blockade, or
quarantine, of Cuba to prevent reinforcement of the Soviet military position on the
island. This put the onus on his Kremlin counterpart, Nikita Khrushchev, to either
accept the clearly signaled American condition for ending the crisis (a full withdrawal
of Soviet missiles from Cuba) or risk nuclear war.

This time, the roles are reversed: Mr. Putin is seeking to enforce a
red line by insisting he will use “all available means,” including his
nuclear arsenal, to defend the newly, unilaterally expanded borders
of Mother Russia. President Biden has promised to
support Ukraine’s attempts to defend itself. It is unclear how Mr.
Putin will react to his red line being ignored.

the biggest danger of nuclear war in October 1962 did not arise from
the so-called eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation between Khrushchev
and Kennedy but from their inability to control events that they
themselves had set in motion.

there were times when both leaders were unaware of developments

on the battlefield that assumed a logic and momentum of their own.

Khrushchev never authorized the shooting down of an American U-

2 spy plane over Cuba by a Soviet missile on Oct. 27, 1962, the most
dangerous day of the crisis. Kennedy was unaware that another U-2
strayed over Russian airspace the same day, triggering Soviet air
defenses. “There’s always some sonofabitch that doesn’t get the
word,” was how he put it later.

on Feb. 24, the 1962 crisis should serve as a reminder of the limits
of intelligence gathering. Kennedy was belatedly informed about the
deployment of medium-range Soviet missiles to Cuba, but was left
in the dark about other equally important matters. He was unaware,
for example, of the presence of nearly 100 Soviet tactical nuclear
missiles in Cuba targeted on the Guantánamo naval base and a
potential American invading force. The C.I.A. underestimated
Soviet troop strength on the island and was unable to track the
movement of any of the nuclear warheads.

Mr. Putin, by contrast, has chosen to raise the stakes at every

critical point. Escalation has become his preferred tactic.

Before the break of dawn on April 15, 1961, a squadron of eight

B-26 bombers piloted by Cuban exiles roared down a
Nicaraguan airstrip on a secret mission. The U.S. Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) and President John F. Kennedy hoped
the Bay of Pigs Invasion would result in the overthrow of Cuban
leader Fidel Castro. But the operation that unfolded over the
next five days became one of the greatest military fiascoes in
American history.
Esteemed Delegates,

As the representative of the United Arab Republic, I stand before you today with a profound sense of
urgency and responsibility regarding the Cuban Missile Crisis. This crisis has brought the world to the
brink of an unimaginable catastrophe, and it is our solemn duty to navigate with wisdom, diplomacy,
and an unwavering commitment to peace.

I propose the following directives to guide our collective efforts:

Diplomatic Engagement and Confidence-Building: We must seize this opportunity to initiate

diplomatic negotiations between the United States, the Soviet Union, and Cuba. It is imperative that
we explore avenues for confidence-building measures and de-escalation strategies. To prevent
misunderstandings and facilitate crisis management, we propose the establishment of a hotline
communication system between the involved parties. Delegates representing these key stakeholders
are directed to engage in constructive dialogue and negotiation within this esteemed committee.

Intelligence Sharing and Monitoring: Accurate and timely intelligence is crucial in navigating this
crisis. We call upon the intelligence agencies of all member states to gather and share intelligence on
the deployment and capabilities of military assets, including nuclear weapons, in Cuba and
surrounding regions. A mechanism for continuous monitoring and assessment of the situation must
be established. Delegates representing intelligence agencies are directed to collaborate discreetly
and exchange information to inform our decision-making processes.

Crisis Response Coordination and Humanitarian Aid: We must prepare for the potential humanitarian
consequences of this crisis. A coordination framework among member states and relevant
international organizations should be established to facilitate crisis response efforts, including the
delivery of humanitarian aid to affected regions and populations. A lead agency or entity should be
designated to coordinate these relief efforts. Delegates representing member states are tasked with
mobilizing resources and support for humanitarian aid initiatives within this framework.

Restraint and Diplomacy: We urge all member states to refrain from military mobilization in the
Caribbean region. Delegates representing member states are tasked with advocating for restraint and
diplomacy in their communications and interactions within this committee. Escalation of military
tensions must be avoided at all costs, as it would jeopardize our efforts to achieve a peaceful
resolution.

Precautionary Measures and Crisis Preparedness: While we strive for a diplomatic solution, we must
also prepare for the worst-case scenario. We advocate for the implementation of precautionary
measures to safeguard civilian populations and critical infrastructure in potentially affected regions.
Contingency plans and crisis management protocols must be developed to address various scenarios
and mitigate the potential impact of the crisis. Delegates representing member states are instructed
to collaborate on drafting and endorsing resolutions or statements outlining these measures.

Esteemed colleagues, the eyes of the world are upon us. We must rise to this challenge with
unwavering determination, wisdom, and a commitment to the principles of diplomacy and peace.
Together, we can navigate this crisis and avert a catastrophe that would forever scar the fabric of
humanity.

Thank yo
The United Arab Republic sees the Cuban Missile Crisis as a very serious and dangerous
scenario that might lead to the Soviet Union and the United States engaging in a devastating
nuclear war. As the Soviet Union's ally and partner, we support their right to self-defense
against the US and NATO's blatant military aggression and supremacy in the area.

We denounce the trade embargo and the US administration's persistent efforts to topple
Cuba's lawful government by acts like the invasion of the Bay of Pigs. The deployment of
Soviet nuclear missiles in Cuba is an understandable deterrent to prevent future US
interventionism in the region.

The UAR acknowledges, however, that the high stakes brinkmanship and calculation error
risk might result in a nuclear confrontation that would be catastrophic and devastating for the
whole globe, including the Arab world caught in the midst. We implore the two countries to
use extreme caution and seek a diplomatic resolution via dialogue.

The UAR is willing to serve as an trusty middle party to mediate between the US and USSR
in order to de-escalate the crisis showcasing our consistent efforts during 1956 Suez Crisis as
proposed in the UNSC Resolution 119.

We propose the following solutions:

  An immediate ceasefire and suspension of any further military deployments to the
region by both sides as per UNSC Resolution 156
 creation of a hotline to avoid misunderstandings between Washington and Moscow.
mutual withdrawal of nuclear offensive weapons from Turkey and Cuba, overseen by
the UN.
 promises from the US to refrain from interfering and to respect Cuban sovereignty as
per UNGA resolution 1514

diplomatic ties between the US and Cuba are being normalized.

The catastrophic humanitarian costs of a nuclear conflict over a tiny island nation are too
great for the world to bear. In order to resolve this situation by morally sound and diplomatic
diplomacy under the direction of the UNSC, all parties must be willing to compromise. The
United Arab Republic is prepared to assist with any sincere diplomatic endeavors.