The document discusses the serial position effect in memory recall experiments. It describes how recall is highest for items at the beginning (primacy effect) and end (recency effect) of a list. The primacy effect occurs because early items can be rehearsed and transferred to long-term memory. The recency effect occurs because late items remain in short-term memory. Delaying recall by 30 seconds eliminates the recency effect by clearing short-term memory, but not the primacy effect from long-term memory.
The document discusses the serial position effect in memory recall experiments. It describes how recall is highest for items at the beginning (primacy effect) and end (recency effect) of a list. The primacy effect occurs because early items can be rehearsed and transferred to long-term memory. The recency effect occurs because late items remain in short-term memory. Delaying recall by 30 seconds eliminates the recency effect by clearing short-term memory, but not the primacy effect from long-term memory.
The document discusses the serial position effect in memory recall experiments. It describes how recall is highest for items at the beginning (primacy effect) and end (recency effect) of a list. The primacy effect occurs because early items can be rehearsed and transferred to long-term memory. The recency effect occurs because late items remain in short-term memory. Delaying recall by 30 seconds eliminates the recency effect by clearing short-term memory, but not the primacy effect from long-term memory.
pas82760_ch08_250-289 8/19/07 3:54 PM Page 256 Team B 107:MHIY036:pas82760_ch08:
256 CHAPTER 8
80 memory. However, as the list gets longer, short-
Tested immediately term memory rapidly fills up and there are too Primacy Test delayed by 30 seconds many words to keep repeating before the next 70 word arrives. Therefore, beyond the first few Recency words, it is harder to rehearse the items and they are less likely to get transferred into long-term 60 memory. If this hypothesis is correct, then the pri- Proportion correct
macy effect should decrease if we are prevented
50 from rehearsing the early words, say, by being presented with the list at a faster rate. Indeed, this is what happens (Glanzer, 1972). 40 As for the recency effect, the last few words still linger in short-term memory and have the benefit of not being bumped out by new informa- 30 tion. Thus, if we try to recall the list immediately, No recency all we have to do is recite the last words from short-term memory before they decay (i.e., fade 20 away). In sum, according to the three-stage 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 model, the primacy effect is due to the transfer of Position in original list early words into long-term memory, whereas the FIGURE 8.6 recency effect is due to the continued presence of The serial position effect. Immediate recall of a word list produces a serial position curve, where primacy information in short-term memory. and recency effects are both evident. However, even a delay of 15 to 30 seconds in recall (during which If this explanation is correct, then it must be rehearsal is prevented) eliminates the recency effect, indicating that the later items in the word list have possible to wipe out the recency effect—but not disappeared from short-term memory. SOURCE: Adapted from Glanzer & Cunitz, 1966. the primacy effect—by eliminating the last words from short-term memory. This happens when the study during final exams, when you have felt as if recall test is delayed, even for as little as 15 to there is no room for storing so much as one more 30 seconds, and we are prevented from rehears- new fact inside your brain. Yet as far as we know, ing the last words. To prevent rehearsal, we might long-term storage capacity essentially is unlim- be asked to briefly count a series of numbers ited, and once formed, a long-term memory can immediately after the last word is presented endure for up to a lifetime. (Glanzer & Cunitz, 1966; Postman & Phillips, Are short-term and long-term memory really 1965). Now by the time we try to recall the last distinct? Case studies of amnesia victims like words, they will have faded from short-term H. M. suggest so. If you told H. M. your name or memory or been bumped out by the numbers task some fact, he could remember it briefly but could (6 . . . 7 . . . 8 . . . 9 . . .). Figure 8.6 shows that under not form a long-term memory of it. Experiments delayed conditions, the recency effect disappears in which people with normal memory learn lists while the primacy effect remains. of words also support this distinction. Suppose Having examined some basic components of that we present you with a series of 15 unrelated memory, let us now explore more fully how infor- words, one word at a time. Immediately after see- mation is encoded, stored, and retrieved. ing or hearing the last word, you are to recall as many words as you can, in any order you wish. As Figure 8.6 illustrates, most experiments find that words at the end and beginning of a list are the IN REVIEW easiest to recall. This U-shaped pattern is called the serial position effect, meaning that the ability to ! Memory involves three main processes (encoding, recall an item is influenced by the item’s position in a storage, and retrieval) and three components series. The serial position effect has two compo- (sensory memory, working/short-term memory, nents: a primacy effect, reflecting the superior recall and long-term memory). of the earliest items, and a recency effect, represent- ! Sensory memory briefly holds incoming sensory ing the superior recall of the most recent items. information. Some information reaches working What causes the primacy effect? According memory and long-term memory, where it is men- to the three-stage model, as the first few words tally represented by visual, phonological, seman- enter short-term memory, we can quickly re- tic, or motor codes. hearse them and transfer them into long-term