You are on page 1of 9

Research Project Reviewer Importance of a research title

 Provides clarity and focus


 Attracts audience and readers
The word research is derived from the  Establishes relevance
French word "recherche", meaning  Forms first impression
"to go about seeking".  Increases discoverability

Capstone/Research Project title - Tips for the impact of your


summarizes the main idea of the manuscript title:
study.
1. Ensure that the title is clear,
interesting, and attracts the
 One way to come up with a good reader’s attention.
title is to write down the 2. The title should be around 10-15
research problem as a question words
then craft your title in response to 3. Avoid unnecessary words and
that question. technical jargons
 You should also try to make the
title as intriguing as possible to
get your readers interested in what CHAPTER I
you have to say. Chapter 1 should include the
following:
Characteristics of a research title  Introduction
 Objective of the study
 It should predict the content of the  Statement of the problem
research paper  Hypothesis
 It should be interesting to the  Scope and delimitation
reader  Significance of the study
 It should reflect the tone of the  Definition of terms
writing
 It should contain important
keywords that will make easier to Introduction
be located during a keyword
search Discuss the 4 relevant ideas:
1. Topic or subject matter
2. Importance of the topic (Additional Info): Statement of the
3. Reason for choosing the topic Problem/Problem Statement
4. Purpose of the study
 A problem statement is the
description of an issue
currently existing which needs
Tips:
to be addressed.
 Keep it short  problem statement is the
 Define the problem backbone of the proposal and
 Make it well-organized the research study.
 Include citations
 Use funneling technique
 AVOID making it preachy Hypothesis
 AVOID including opinionated
 A tentative answer to a research
statements
problem
Null hypothesis
is the one that states NO relationship
Objective of the study between variables. Its function is to
let the research test the hypothesis
 Statement of a long-term
statistically; denoted by Ho
objective expected to be achieved
by the study Alternative hypothesis
 It is usually prefixed by this
is usually taken to show that the
introductory phrase: “The main
observations are the result of a real
objective of this study is to…”
effect; denoted by Ha

Statement of the problem


 Specific questions which are to
Scope and Delimitation
be answered in the study
 It can be a general statement of The SCOPE describes the coverage
the whole problem followed by of the study;
specific questions or sub-problems  Specifies what is covered in
into which the general problem is terms of concept, number of
broken up. subjects, and timeline when the
study was conducted.
DELIMITATION refers to factors or  Experts concerned about the
variables that are not included in problem
the study and the boundary in terms  Administrators who make
of time frame, number of subjects decisions or implement
who are excluded; programs
 The subjects themselves
 Specify those that you will not
 Future researchers
deal within the study.
 Those who are directly and
indirectly affected by the
 WHAT - the topic and the problem
variables included  Field of specialization or
 WHERE – the venue or discipline that will gain
setting of the research contribution of knowledge
 WHEN – time frame by which  Specific sectors who will also
the study was conducted benefit from the study
 WHO – participants or Definition of Terms
respondents, population, and
 Only terms, words, or phrases
sampling
which have special or unique
 WHY – general purpose of
meanings or roles in the study
the study
are defined.
 HOW – the methodology of
 Terms should be arranged
the research (research design,
alphabetically.
methods, research instrument)
 Terms should be defined
operationally and
conceptually.

Significance of the study


In this part, the researchers defines Tips in writing your D.O.T.:
who will benefit out of the findings of 1. Include the variables involve in
the study and how they will benefit your study (IV, DV, sub-
from it. variables).
2. Include words and concepts
related to your main variable.
Usual beneficiaries of a research: 3. Include terms that may be
considered as jargons.
Research Question
A research question is the question CHAPTER II
around which you center your
Scientific Literature
research. It should be:
A paraphrase restates another’s idea
(or your own previously published
 Clear: it provides enough specifics idea) in your own words.
that one’s audience can easily Paraphrasing allows you to
understand its purpose without summarize and synthesize
needing additional explanation. information from one or more
 Focused: it is narrow enough that it sources.
can be answered thoroughly in the
space the writing task allows.
 Concise: it is expressed in the Chicago Manual Style
fewest possible words.
 For students, using “Chicago
 Complex: it is not answerable with
style” usually means putting
a simple “yes” or “no,” but rather
notes and bibliographies into
requires synthesis and analysis of
the formats laid out in The
ideas and sources prior to
Chicago Manual of Style or in
composition of an answer.
Kate Turabian’s Manual for
 Arguable: its potential answers are
Writers.
open to debate rather than accepted
facts.
 a different citation system called
“author-date” style. In author-
date style, note citations appear in
Steps to developing a research the text of your paper like this
question: (Chou 2013). Full citations are
then listed together in an
1. Choose an interesting topic
alphabetical “reference list” at the
2. Do some preliminary research on
end of the paper.
your general topic
 The author-date system of
3. Consider your audience
Chicago Manual of Style is more
4. Start asking questions
common in the sciences and
5. Evaluate your question
social sciences.
6. Begin your research
 it does not put a comma between organizational pattern and
the name and year. combines both summary and
synthesis.

Reference list citations


How about Scientific Literature
 A reference list (sometimes titled
Review?
“Works Cited”) is similar to a
bibliography. A scientific literature review is a
 For the reference list, put your critical account of what has been
sources in alphabetical order by published on a topic by accredited
the author’s last name. The researchers. It may be:
author’s last name comes first to  A stand-alone assignment
make alphabetizing easier, and the  An introduction to an essay,
year of the work comes report, thesis, etc.
immediately after the author.  Part of research/grant proposal
Use a period after the author, research
after the date, and after the title.

How to Write a Scientific Literature


Review of Related Literatures Review?
 The “literature” of a literature Reviewing the literature requires four
review refers to any collection of stages:
materials on a topic, not
necessarily the great literary texts
of the world. 1. Problem formulation - Which
 A literature review discusses topic is being examined and why?
published information in a
particular subject area, and 2. Literature search - Identifying
sometimes information in a relevant research.
particular subject area within a A. Online Research (basic) –
certain time period. Background Information
 A literature review can be just a
• Wikipedia
simple summary of the sources,
but it usually has an
• Relevant “background” websites (ex. • Persuasiveness – Is the author’s data
university websites, company convincing?
websites, associations ex. American
• Value - Does the work contribute in
Heart Association)
a significant way to an understanding
• YouTube, TED Talks of the field?
• Google Scholar/Books
• PubMed …find other relevant 4. Evaluation and Interpretation –
literature reviews in the area to see which authors are most convincing and
what has been done/what is needed provide the most significant scientific
contribution?

C. Specific Literature Search – The


Detail CHAPTER III
• Library databases ex. Web of Science Research Methodology
• “Advanced search” tool in Google  covers the methods of the
Scholar/PubMed research, the variety of
• Identify key references for each topic procedures made, and the entire
of your review preparation of the study.
 It is written with 2 purposes in
mind: Replicate and Evaluate
3. Critical analysis – Criticize the
experts; identify conflicting evidence,
assumptions, errors and Research Methodology should include
misconceptions. This involves the following:
CRITICAL THINKING.  Research Design
• Provenance - Author's credentials?  Research Setting
Are the author's arguments supported  Research Subjects
by evidence?  Research Ethics
 Research Instruments
• Objectivity - Is the author's  Validation of Instruments
perspective fair? Is contrary data  Data Gathering Procedure
considered? Is information ignored to
prove the author's point? (bias)
Research Design studied with manipulation of
variables.
 Discusses the approach
(qualitative/quantitative) and
1. Quasi-experimental
design (phenomenology,
2. True Experimental
experimental, descriptive,
etc.) use in the study.
 In this part, the reason(s) why Research Setting/Locale
the design was chosen must be
justified.  Description of the
geographical
characteristic of the
Qualitative Approach: place of study
 State the reasons why the
 Historical specific locale was chosen
 Ethnographic  In special cases,
 Case Study anonymity (UNKNOWN)
 Narrative Analysis must always be observed
 Grounded Theory

Research Subject
Quantitative approach:
 Description of the
 Non-experimental – The demographic
association or connection characteristics of the
between variables without participants in the study
manipulation of variables.  Explanation of the
population and sampling
procedures should also be
1. Survey Research discussed:
2. Correlational Research
3. Comparative Research
 Number of respondents
 Profile of the respondents
 Experimental – Establishes
causality and often used when
an intervention is being
Sampling – process of 4. Cluster Sampling – is a
selecting the sample or a method of selecting cluster
portion of the population from a population that is
large and widely dispersed
Population – consists of all
over a wide geographical
the members of the group
area.
about which the researchers
want to draw a conclusion.
Sample – a portion or part of Types of Non-probability
the population of interest sampling:
selected for analysis; subset
1. Convenience Sampling –
of the population elements
selection of the sample
based on the convenience
of the researcher.
Types of Probability
Sampling:
Also called as “accidental
1. Simple random sampling sampling”
– most basic probability
sampling technique. 2. Purposive Sampling – the
Ex: Fishbowl Technique selection of the sample
based on the selective
judgement of the
2. Systematic sampling – a researcher.
process of selecting the kth
element in the population Also called as
until the desired number of “judgmental sampling”
samples is attained.
3. Quota Sampling – the
SAMPLING INTERVAL – researcher identifies
standard distance between population section or strata
element chosen for the and decides how many
sample. participants are required
from each section.

3. Stratified sampling – the 4. Snowball Sampling – a


population is divided into technique wherein sample
subgroups or strata. members are asked to refer
other people who meet the  Number and types of
criteria required by the questionnaire used;
researcher.  Number of items
 Permission must be
- based on the assumption obtained, whether the
that people who share the instrument used is
same traits or experiences borrowed/standardized,
knows each other. adapted, or self-made

Research Ethics Validation of Instrument


The section where the
Reliability – consistency of
researcher can attest that
the test/instruments
the study was conducted
with the consideration to Validity – accuracy the
the rights of the human test/instruments
subjects they will involve
in the study

Data Gathering
Research Ethical
Procedure
Considerations:
The step-by-step process
1. Intellectual Property
must be explained
2. Informed-consent comprehensively by the
researchers
3. Respect for
confidentiality

Research Instrument
Each questionnaire used in
the study must be
described in detail here:

You might also like