Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
Executive summary................................................................................................................................... II
1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Objective of the study ................................................................................................................... 1
1.1.1 General Objectives........................................................................................................................... 1
1.1.2 Specific Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Description of the study area .............................................................................................................. 1
1.3 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 2
1.4 Scope................................................................................................................................................... 2
1.5 River Flow .......................................................................................................................................... 2
1.6 Design Flood....................................................................................................................................... 4
1.6.1 Design Rainfall Analysis ................................................................................................................. 4
1.6.1.1 Hydrologic Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 4
1.6.1.2 Unit hydrograph method ............................................................................................................... 5
1.7 Base flow .......................................................................................................................................... 13
1.8 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................ 14
1.9 Recommendation .............................................................................................................................. 14
Executive summary
Lega Hayi project is found in Oromia Regional State north shoa Zone Y/Gullele district
Daleti na Rimeti, Illu na Dire and Kuchu na Tegego Kebeles. It is 8km far from Fital main
town of Y/Gullele district. The total catchment area of the project covers 11km2. As
understanding from elders, during the rainy season high flood and silt load is expected. At
downstream community is use for cattle.
At the proposed diversion site, lega hayi is very deep and need compaction during the
construction.
Design flood of project is done both by Unit hydrograph and slope area method. But we me
must be considering unit hydrograph =30m3/s at depth of 1.84m and EL. 2528.6m.
The base flow which measurement is taken by float method is about 14l/sec.
1 Introduction
The purpose of hydrology study is to assess the water resource availability, extent and quality
for irrigation with respect to different conditions of metrological elements. And also the basic
knowledge of hydrology in irrigation project design and planning, construction of irrigation
structures, bridges, highway culverts, flood control works and spillways is a paramount impa-
tience.
In this study and design report of Hayi small scale irrigation project, the hydrologic study
conducted to provide valuable clues about the catchment’s behavior, climatic, water potential
etc of the project area in focus.
To provide certain information on the water source (river) its time distribution to
satisfy the irrigation demand in the local situation is essential for the project.
To assess the water resource availability, extent and quality of the water for irrigation.
Hayi river is start in Y/Gulelle district and drains to mogor river and thus it is in Abay-basin.
The land use of the area is dominantly cultivated, grazing and others. The soil of the area is
dominantly both clay and silt (clay, clay to loam) and brownish red and red in color.
Summarized as follow:
1.4 Scope
The scope of study is to study the basic hydro meteorological elements related to design of
Head structure, supply canal and other irrigation hydraulic infrastructure.
Record Year 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
Daily
Max.(mm) 42 53 40.3 33.4 34.6 39.7 42.8 27.5 36.8
Record Year 1998 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Daily
Max(mm) 38.6 33.7 57 73.7 49.6 39.6 38.6 46.1 52.3
After collection the daily max rainfall, the design rainfall for 50 years of return period is
to be computed using extreme value type I or Gumblel’s distribution. Gumblel’s
distribution is the method used for weir.
Gumbrl’s distribution is the most widely used probability distribution function for
extreme values in hydrologic and meteorological studies for prediction of flood peaks.
XT =Xav+S (0.78y-0.45)
N=18
Xav= ∑Xm/n=43.18
Xav2=1864.8
∑Xm2=35478.99
=14.4
=76.45
Statistics:
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Daily
point
Rearranged Order
Area Rearr
Descending Order
Rainfa Incre
Rain to anged Cumul Time of Incremental unit
ll of Rainfa Areal ment
Duratio Fall Point Incre ative hydrograph
Retur ll Rainfa al
n Profil Rainf mental Rain
n Profile ll Rainf
e all Rainfa fall
period all
Ratio ll
Of 100
year
hr mm % mm % mm mm No No mm mm hr hr hr
0 to
76.00 12.0 9.12 36.6 3.34 3.34 4 6 3.79 3.79 0 0.33 0.88
0.1
0.1 to
18.4 13.98 50.6 7.08 3.74 3 4 2.18 5.97 0.10 0.43 0.98
0.2
0.2 to
21.0 15.96 60.4 9.64 2.56 5 3 2.56 8.53 0.20 0.53 1.08
0.3
0.3
23.0 17.48 67.6 11.82 2.18 4 1 3.34 11.87 0.30 0.63 1.18
to0.4
0.4
33.4 25.38 72.6 18.43 6.61 3 2 3.74 15.61 0.40 0.73 1.28
to0.5
0.5 to
39.0 29.64 75.0 22.22 3.79 2 5 6.61 22.22 0.50 0.83 1.38
0.6
25 26 27 28 29 30
Area Hydro Sum
Land use Curve Weighted
Ratio soil Weighted
Cover No”CN” “CN”
% group “CN”
31
32
Using Q= (P-
0.2*S)
2
/(P+0.8*S),it
33 is possible to C=21 C=33
define the
direct run off
Q,(mm)
Q
P (mm)
(mm)
3.79 0.00 0.00
5.97 0.00 0.00
8.53 0.00 0.00
11.87 0.62 4.94
15.61 1.74 8.68
22.22 4.68 15.29
34 35 36 37 38 39
Hr mm mm M3/s Hr Hr Hr f(t)=Q
0 to 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.33 0.88
0.1 to
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.43 0.98
0.2
0.2 to
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.53 1.08
0.3
0.3 to0.4 0.62 0.62 4.35 0.30 0.63 1.18
0.4 to0.5 1.74 1.12 7.91 0.40 0.73 1.28
0.5 to
2.94 20.75 0.50 0.83 1.38
0.6 4.68
Unit Hydrograph
1 2 3 4 5 6
to 0 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50
Qo 0 0 0 0 0 0
tp 0.33 0.43 0.53 0.63 0.73 0.83
20.7
Qp 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.35 7.91 5
tb 0.88 0.98 1.08 1.18 1.28 1.38
Qo' 0 0 0 0 0 0
3
Time(hr) Ordinate of Hydrograph(m /s) Total
1 2 3 4 5 6
0 0.00 0
0.10 0.00 0 0
0.20 0.00 0 0.00 0
0.30 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0
0.40 0.00 0 0.00 1.33 0.00 1
0.33 0.00 0 0.00 0.37 -1.74 -1
0.50 0.00 0 0.00 2.65 2.41 0.00 5
0.43 0.00 0 0.00 1.69 0.67 -4.57 -2
0.53 0.00 0 0.00 3.02 3.08 1.76 8
0.63 0.00 0 0.00 4.35 5.50 8.09 18
0.73 0.0 0 0.00 3.55 7.91 14.42 26
0.83 0.0 0 0.0 2.8 6.46 20.75 30
0.88 0.0 0 0.0 2.4 5.78 18.95 27
0.98 0 0.0 1.6 4.33 15.16 21
1.08 0.0 0.8 2.89 11.37 15
1.18 0.0 1.44 7.58 9
1.28 0.00 3.79 4
1.38 0.00 0
UNIT HYDROGRAPH
35
30
DISCHRGE (m3/s)
25
20
15
10
0
0 1 2
TIME (hr)
Peak discharge by unit hydrograph method = 30m3/s at depth of 1.84m depth and
elevation of 2528.6m
Accumulat
ed Elevation
X Y Distance Depth Auto CAD
Point ID Distance (Z)
(East) (North) (m) (m) (x,y)
(Width) (m)
(m)
455771.76
RCX 0+00 0 0,0
7 1062933.2 0 0 2529.154
455767.81 3950.73575423191,-
RCX 0+03.95 -0.150
9 1062933.4 3.95 3.95 2529.004 150.000000000091
455763.80 7967.50024823207,-
RCX 0+07.97 -0.241
5 1062933.5 4.02 7.97 2528.913 240.999999999985
455759.83 11936.260760037,-
RCX 0+11.94 -0.460
9 1062933.7 3.97 11.94 2528.694 460.000000000036
455755.92 15853.9450249876,-
RCX 0+15.85 -1.359
4 1062933.8 3.92 15.85 2527.795 1358.99999999992
455752.99 18785.9717983982,-
RCX 0+18.79 -1.646
4 1062933.9 2.93 18.79 2527.508 1646.00000000019
455747.00 24781.1206705914,-
RCX 0+24.78 -1.083
3 1062934.1 6.00 24.78 2528.071 1083.00000000008
455743.94 27840.2455454768,-
RCX 0+27.84 -0.882
6 1062934.3 3.06 27.84 2528.272 882.000000000062
455740.05 31730.9112982558,-
RCX 0+31.73 -0.698
8 1062934.4 3.89 31.73 2528.456 697.999999999865
455736.05 35733.6854612574,-
RCX 0+35.73 -0.399
8 1062934.6 4.00 35.73 2528.755 398.999999999887
455732.01 39778.4677792691,-
RCX 0+39.78 -0.095
6 1062934.7 4.04 39.78 2529.059 94.9999999997999
43733.2007664575,
RCX 0+43.73 455728.06 0.234
233.999999999924
4 1062934.9 3.95 43.73 2529.388
↑
Slope 0.013
Coefficient of Roughness 0.04
Note ; Water
Wetted Hydra
Water Dischar area and
Elevation Depth Perimet ulic velocity Wetted
area ge
(m) (m) er radius (m/s) Perimeter
(m2) (m3/s) calculated by
(m) (m) Auto CAD
2526.747 0 0 0 0 0 0
2527 0.253 0.59 10.302 0.06 0.42 0.25
2528 1.253 12.859 38.99 0.33 1.36 17.50
2529 2.253 26.777 78.6680 0.34 1.39 37.21
2529.172 2.425 28.9003 87.0230 0.33 1.37 39.51 Flood mark
Rating curve
2530.000
2529.500
2529.388
2529.172
2529.000 2529
Elevation(m)
2528.500
2528.000 2528
2527.500
2527.000 2527
2526.747
2526.500
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Discharge(m3/s)
Discharge by slope area method = 39.51m3/s at depth of 2.425 and EL. 2529.172m
. . . ( /
Qav =
1.8 Conclusion
Design flood of project is done both by Unit hydrograph and slope area method. But we me
must be considering unit hydrograph =30m3/s at depth of 1.84m and EL. 2528.6m.
The base flow which measurement is taken by float method is about 14l/sec
1.9 Recommendation
At the proposed diversion site, lega hayi is very deep and need compaction during the
construction.
Upstream of the proposed site, there is FTC station. The water use for this station must be
release to hayi project