PA2020473 - Dwelling - 29B Foreshore Road Kelso

James
Proposed Dwelling
29B Forshore Road, Kelso
DRAWING SCHEDULE: GENERAL INFORMATION:
Sheet No: Drawing: Rev: Revision Date:
Accredited Architect: Sam Haberle
A000 Cover B 19/01/21
Accreditation Number: CC5618 U
A101 Site Plan B 19/01/21
Land Title Reference Number: C.T. 23739/6
A201 Ground Floor B 19/01/21
B Municipality: West Tamar Council
A202 Upper Floor 19/01/21
B Planning Scheme Overlay: Bushfire Prone Areas Code, Coastal Inundation
A301 Elevations 01 19/01/21
A302 Elevations 02 B 19/01/21 Zoning: Low Density Residential
Building Class: 1
Soil classification: A
Wind Classification: N3
Climate Zone: 7
Alpine Area: N/A
Corrosion environment: N/A
Other Known site hazards: N/A
BMS
19/01/2021
REVISION B DATE 19/01/21 DESCRIPTION Planning Permit

ADDRESS do not scale off plans ISSUE
1 Smith Street, Suburb all dimensions in millimetres
confirm all dimensions on site
all work to relevant NCC and AS
DA
CLIENT DWG #
Client Name
DWG
SCALE @ A3
DRAWN JF
-
A000
Cover CHKD SH PROJECT# J006838
FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ONLY S. Group

© Copyright 2018
Level 1, 10-14 Paterson st, Launceston | Level 1, 90-92 Murray st, Hobart | 83 Langridge st, Collingwood, Melbourne
T: 03 63 111 403 E: info@sgroup.com.au sgroup.com.au
FO
RE
SH
8
3
64
5.1 site OR
E R
79
00
1 bo
96
un
60
112 dary
30
35
09
°11
"0
proposed crossover
OA
00 let
0
ter
bo
'
x
s
5.11 ite bo
und
D
112° ary
proposed driveway 11"0
0'
decomposed bushfire fighting watertank
granite connection point/upstand with
30 signage to Tas Fire Service
26 requirements
45 300
55 0
up
flo per
0
setb
600
21mor de ack
2 ck
0
670
stormwater disposal area
refer to report
05
469
3
101
355
'
30
8
°0 ry
44 nda
2"
u
0 bo
existing neighbouring house
.5 te
43 si
up
flo per
27mor de
bushfire fighting water tank 2 c k
proposed dwelling
F
6
0'
38
29A Foreshore Road
3
11
12"
26° y
Kelso
ar
822m2
nd
ou
ct: 23739/6 low
125 er fl
56 ite b
re 11 m 2 oor
fe 76
r t AES 8
s
o
re
po
42.
00
rt
30
re
s
re erv
fe e up
r t ar
o ea
re 1
154 per f
m 2 loo
2500
po 3m r
rt 2
septic tank
refer to report
84
pump pit and pump

88
469 refer to report

s 8
19. ite b
13 91 ou
75 30 nd
6 2°5 ar
0" y existing neighbouring house
00
'
setb
ack
6
933
6.10 site bo
BMS
0
300
und
290 ary
°08 existing
19/01/2021 "00
' outbuildings

1 ADDRESS do not scale off plans ISSUE
0 2 4 0 1 Smith Street, Suburb all dimensions in millimetres
DA
NORTH
CLIENT DWG #
Client Name
METRES DWG
SCALE @ A3
DRAWN
1:200
JF
A101
1 centimetre on this drawing represents
Site Plan CHKD SH PROJECT# J006838
FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ONLY

2 metres on the ground (i.e. 1:200). Level 1, 10-14 Paterson st, Launceston | Level 1, 90-92 Murray st, Hobart | 83 Langridge st, Collingwood, Melbourne
S. Group
© Copyright 2018 T: 03 63 111 403 E: info@sgroup.com.au sgroup.com.au
WALL LEGEND GLAZING NOTES FLOOR COVERING NOTES
MARK DESCRIPTION SUBMIT MANUFACTURERS DETAILS FOR ANY NEW CARPET &/OR FLOOR VINYL
PROVIDE CERTIFICATION FOR THE WINDOWS AND GLAZING AT THE
COMPLETION OF THE BUILDING WORKS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE SHOWING THE FIRE HAZARD PROPERTIES TO ALLOW ASSESSMENT WITH
EXTERNAL TIMBER STUD WALL CONSTRUCTION
TRIMDEK METAL SHEET CLADDING - COLORBOND FINISH, OVER REQUIREMENTS OF AS 1288 (safety). SPECIFICATION C1.10 OF THE NCC, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
35MM BATTEN, INSTALL TO MANUFACTURERS DETAILS, COLORBOND FULLY FRAMED GLAZING SHALL BE 'GRADE A' SAFETY GLASS IN ACCORDANCE FLOOR COVERINGS / SURFACES SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH PART 7 OF AS
FLASHINGS TO SUIT WITH TABLE 5.1. OF AS 1288-2006 (GLASS IN BUILDINGS - SELECTION & 1428.1-2009 (DESIGN FOR ACCESS & MOBILITY).
140X45 MGP10 PLATES, NOGGINGS MID-HEIGHT, STUDS @ 450CTS. INSTALLATION). WHERE APPLICABLE ALLOW FOR TREDSAFE DT024 NATURAL ANODISED
R2.5 GLASSWOOL WALL-BATT INSULATION + VAPOUR PERMEABLE TRANSITION TRIM AT ALL JUNCTIONS BETWEEN CARPET AND VINYL.
SISILATION WALL WRAP OR SIMILAR APPROVED, INSTALLED TO PAINTING SCHEDULE ALLOW FOR CONTACT BACK FLOOR PROTECTION TO ALL FLOORING DURING
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION.
10MM PASTERBOARD INTERNAL WALL LININGS INSTALLED TO WALLS
MANUFACTURES DETAIL, PAINTED FINISH
1 COAT PLASTERBOARD SEALER SETOUT NOTES
2 COATS OF 'DULUX' LO-SHEEN WASHABLE LATEX
ALL 'EXISTING' DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE CONFIRMED ON-SITE.
JAMES HARDIE, EASYLAP CEMENT SHEET CLADDING IN SELECTED COLOUR, ALLOW FOR 2 FEATURE WALL COLOURS,
ANY ANOMALIES ARE TO BE DIRECTED TO THE DESIGNER.
INSTALL TO MANUFACTUXRERS DETAILS & SPECIFICATION, PAINTED LOCATIONS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH CLIENTS. (if required)
USE WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ONLY (ie. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS).
FINISH, JOINS PAINTED TO MATCH. TIMBER DOORS
CHECK ALL LEVELS, DATUM'S & DIMENSIONS BEFORE COMMENCING
90X45 MGP10 PLATES, NOGGINGS MID-HEIGHT, STUDS @ 450CTS. 1 COAT OF 3 IN 1 (PRIMER/SEALER/UNDERCOAT).
ANY WORK OR SHOP DRAWINGS.
R2.5 GLASSWOOL WALL-BATT INSULATION + VAPOUR PERMEABLE 3 COATS OF SEMI-GLOSS ENAMEL IN SELECTED COLOUR.
SISILATION WALL WRAP OR SIMILAR APPROVED, INSTALLED TO ALL PAINTS TO BE 'DULUX' LOW VOC PAINTS - NO SUBSTITUTES.
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS
10MM PASTERBOARD INTERNAL WALL LININGS INSTALLED TO FLOOR FINISHES
MANUFACTURES DETAIL UNLESS OTHERXWISE NOTED, PAINTED
FINISH BROADLOOM CARPET WITH UNDERLAY
CU
SELECTION TBC
INTERNAL TIMBER STUD WALL
90X45 MGP10 PLATES, NOGGINGS MID-HEIGHT, STUDS @ 450CTS. ENGINEERED TIMBER FLOORING - TAS OAK VINEER
TF
R2.5 GLASSWOOL WALL-BATT ACOUSTIC INSULATION HEAVEY DUTY POLYURETHANE SEALANT FINISH
4155 6330
10MM PASTERBOARD INTERNAL WALL LININGS INSTALLED TO
7195
FINISH
line of deck over
l.
co
.14
.15
.16
.10
.13
.12
.17
.11
.4
.5
.6
.8
.9
.3
.2
.7
.1
line of roof over
BMS
l.
l.
line of building over
co
co
90
19/01/2021
line of building over

650
l.
l.
co
co
line of deck over

garage roller door
rm02
garage
concrete
6090
117m2
7510
l.
l.
l.
l.
co
co
co
co
90
rm01
140 1100
entry
TF
1.7m2
.14
.15
.16
.10
.13
.12
.17
.11
.4
.9
.8
.6
.5
.3
.2
.7
.1
future lift
10550
4780 5705 7260 4535 1290
90 17500 90
17680

ADDRESS do not scale off plans ISSUE
0 1 2 5 1 Smith Street, Suburb all dimensions in millimetres
DA
CLIENT DWG #
Client Name
METRES
OR
T H
DWG
SCALE @ A3
DRAWN
1:100
JF
A201
1 centimetre on this drawing represents N Ground Floor CHKD SH PROJECT# J006838
1 metre on the ground (i.e. 1:100).

© Copyright 2018
WALL LEGEND GLAZING NOTES FLOOR COVERING NOTES FLOOR FINISHES
MARK DESCRIPTION SUBMIT MANUFACTURERS DETAILS FOR ANY NEW CARPET &/OR FLOOR VINYL BROADLOOM CARPET WITH UNDERLAY
PROVIDE CERTIFICATION FOR THE WINDOWS AND GLAZING AT THE CU
COMPLETION OF THE BUILDING WORKS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE SHOWING THE FIRE HAZARD PROPERTIES TO ALLOW ASSESSMENT WITH SELECTION TBC
TRIMDEK METAL SHEET CLADDING - COLORBOND FINISH, OVER REQUIREMENTS OF AS 1288 (safety). SPECIFICATION C1.10 OF THE NCC, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
FLOOR COVERINGS / SURFACES SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH PART 7 OF AS ENGINEERED TIMBER FLOORING - TAS OAK VINEER
35MM BATTEN, INSTALL TO MANUFACTURERS DETAILS, COLORBOND FULLY FRAMED GLAZING SHALL BE 'GRADE A' SAFETY GLASS IN ACCORDANCE TF
1428.1-2009 (DESIGN FOR ACCESS & MOBILITY). HEAVEY DUTY POLYURETHANE SEALANT FINISH
FLASHINGS TO SUIT WITH TABLE 5.1. OF AS 1288-2006 (GLASS IN BUILDINGS - SELECTION &
140X45 MGP10 PLATES, NOGGINGS MID-HEIGHT, STUDS @ 450CTS. INSTALLATION). WHERE APPLICABLE ALLOW FOR TREDSAFE DT024 NATURAL ANODISED
R2.5 GLASSWOOL WALL-BATT INSULATION + VAPOUR PERMEABLE TRANSITION TRIM AT ALL JUNCTIONS BETWEEN CARPET AND VINYL. T CERAMIC FLOOR TILES
SISILATION WALL WRAP OR SIMILAR APPROVED, INSTALLED TO PAINTING SCHEDULE ALLOW FOR CONTACT BACK FLOOR PROTECTION TO ALL FLOORING DURING
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION.
10MM PASTERBOARD INTERNAL WALL LININGS INSTALLED TO WALLS
MANUFACTURES DETAIL, PAINTED FINISH
1 COAT PLASTERBOARD SEALER SETOUT NOTES
2 COATS OF 'DULUX' LO-SHEEN WASHABLE LATEX
ALL 'EXISTING' DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE CONFIRMED ON-SITE.
JAMES HARDIE, EASYLAP CEMENT SHEET CLADDING IN SELECTED COLOUR, ALLOW FOR 2 FEATURE WALL COLOURS,
ANY ANOMALIES ARE TO BE DIRECTED TO THE DESIGNER.
INSTALL TO MANUFACTUXRERS DETAILS & SPECIFICATION, PAINTED LOCATIONS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH CLIENTS. (if required)
USE WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ONLY (ie. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS).
FINISH, JOINS PAINTED TO MATCH. TIMBER DOORS
CHECK ALL LEVELS, DATUM'S & DIMENSIONS BEFORE COMMENCING
90X45 MGP10 PLATES, NOGGINGS MID-HEIGHT, STUDS @ 450CTS. 1 COAT OF 3 IN 1 (PRIMER/SEALER/UNDERCOAT).
ANY WORK OR SHOP DRAWINGS.
R2.5 GLASSWOOL WALL-BATT INSULATION + VAPOUR PERMEABLE 3 COATS OF SEMI-GLOSS ENAMEL IN SELECTED COLOUR.
SISILATION WALL WRAP OR SIMILAR APPROVED, INSTALLED TO ALL PAINTS TO BE 'DULUX' LOW VOC PAINTS - NO SUBSTITUTES.
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS
FINISH
INTERNAL TIMBER STUD WALL

90X45 MGP10 PLATES, NOGGINGS MID-HEIGHT, STUDS @ 450CTS.
6980
R2.5 GLASSWOOL WALL-BATT ACOUSTIC INSULATION
MANUFACTURES DETAIL UNLESS OTHERXWISE NOTED, PAINTED 3700 90 1000 90 1400 90 2100 90 3000 5960 140 5400 140
FINISH
propriatory glass
balustrade
balcony deck
composite decking
26m2
.14
.15
.16
.10
.13
.12
.17
.11
.4
.5
.6
.8
.9
.3
.2
.7
.1
3100
rm09
w/c
T
line of roof over 1.9m2
propriatory glass
l.
balustrade
co
140
140
560
rm10
balcony deck
bed wc.
140
tub. composite decking
robe
CU 22m2
11.1m2 rm05
pantry
3000
1540
shr. TF
shr. 2.3m2
QB rm09 QB
90
shower wc.
T rm08 rm07
shelving/hanging
rm06
5.2m2
ens. w.i.r.
6370
6090
master bed
90
T CU T
5390
rm11 va. 7.7m2 7.7m2
12.3m2
2370
bed va.
CU broom
11.1m2 adjustable
shelving tr.
F
3000
l'dry
robe
rm04 rm03
QB
hallway living/kitchen/dine
TF TF
57m2
l.
co
20m2
140
140
future lift
.14
.15
.16
.10
.13
.12
.17
.11
.4
.9
.8
.6
.5
.3
.2
.7
.1
140 3845
1000 90 5200 90 1390 90 1500 90 725
140 3700 90 9450 9960 140 3440
23480

BMS ADDRESS do not scale off plans ISSUE
confirm all dimensions on site DA
19/01/2021
CLIENT DWG #
Client Name
DWG
SCALE @ A3
DRAWN
1:200
JF
A202
Upper Floor CHKD SH PROJECT# J006838

© Copyright 2018
CT1
glass infil panel to underside of roof system F.

F. S.
CT2
A.
CT5 CT2 A. F. A. A.
2700
CT2
7450
propriatory glass balustrade
1200mm from FFL
F. F. F. F.
600
CT3 CT3
2400
North Elevation
01 Scale: 1:100
A.
A. F. F.
2700
F.
7450
F. F.
600
CT3
2400
South Elevation
02 Scale: 1:100
EXTERNAL FINISHES & COLOURS SCHEDULE: ELEVATION KEY

LYSAGHT CUSTOM ORB® STEEL SHEET ROOFING, INSTALLED TO MANUFACTURER'S MARK DESCRIPTION
CT1 SPECIFICATIONS,
PROVIDE ALL FLASHINGS TO SUIT, COLORBOND® FINISH (OR MATCH EXISTING) A. Awning Window. BMS
CT2
LYSAGHT TRIMDEK® STEEL SHEET CLADDING, INSTALLED TO MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS,
F. Fixed Window.
19/01/2021
PROVIDE ALL FLASHINGS TO SUIT, COLORBOND® FINISH S. Sliding / Stacking Door.
JAMES HARDIE, EASYLAP CEMENT SHEET CLADDING, TEXTURE COAT PAINTED FINISH G. Glazed Door.
CT3 (INSTALL TO MANUFACTUXRERS DETAILS & SPECIFICATION)
do not scale off plans
ADDRESS ISSUE
PAINT COLOUR TBC - JOINS PAINTED TO MATCH. DP. Downpipe.
DA
CEMINTAL, BARESTONE EXTERNAL CLADDING ALL CLADDINGS INSTALLED TO MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS CLIENT DWG #
CT4 Client Name
(INSTALL TO MANUFACTURERS DETAIL & SPECIFICATION) - ASH FINISH
BATTER TO COMPLY WITH NCC DWG
SCALE @ A3
DRAWN
1:200
JF
A301
ALUMINIUM WINDOW & DOOR FRAMES. GROUND LEVELS SHOWN INDICATIVELY, ENSURE FINISH SURFACE
Elevations 01 CHKD SH PROJECT# J006838
CT5 POWDER COAT FINISH AS SELECTED.
FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ONLY FALLS AWAY FROM STRUCTURE. S. Group
© Copyright 2018
CT4 CT4
CT2 F. S. S. F.
CT2 CT2
2700
CT5
7450
propriatory glass balustrade
1200mm from FFL propriatory glass balustrade
1200mm from FFL
600
CT3
propriatory garage door
2400
CT5
S. F. G. G.
West Elevation Northern Elevation

01 Scale: 1:100 02 Scale: 1:100
EXTERNAL FINISHES & COLOURS SCHEDULE: ELEVATION KEY

LYSAGHT CUSTOM ORB® STEEL SHEET ROOFING, INSTALLED TO MANUFACTURER'S MARK DESCRIPTION
CT1 SPECIFICATIONS,
PROVIDE ALL FLASHINGS TO SUIT, COLORBOND® FINISH (OR MATCH EXISTING) A. Awning Window. BMS
CT2
LYSAGHT TRIMDEK® STEEL SHEET CLADDING, INSTALLED TO MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS,
F. Fixed Window. 19/01/2021
PROVIDE ALL FLASHINGS TO SUIT, COLORBOND® FINISH S. Sliding / Stacking Door.
JAMES HARDIE, EASYLAP CEMENT SHEET CLADDING, TEXTURE COAT PAINTED FINISH G. Glazed Door.
CT3 (INSTALL TO MANUFACTUXRERS DETAILS & SPECIFICATION)
do not scale off plans
ADDRESS ISSUE
PAINT COLOUR TBC - JOINS PAINTED TO MATCH. DP. Downpipe.
DA
CEMINTAL, BARESTONE EXTERNAL CLADDING ALL CLADDINGS INSTALLED TO MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS CLIENT DWG #
CT4 Client Name
(INSTALL TO MANUFACTURERS DETAIL & SPECIFICATION) - ASH FINISH
BATTER TO COMPLY WITH NCC DWG
SCALE @ A3
DRAWN
1:200
JF
A302
ALUMINIUM WINDOW & DOOR FRAMES. GROUND LEVELS SHOWN INDICATIVELY, ENSURE FINISH SURFACE
Elevations 02 CHKD SH PROJECT# J006838
CT5 POWDER COAT FINISH AS SELECTED.
FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ONLY FALLS AWAY FROM STRUCTURE. S. Group
© Copyright 2018
Geotechnical Consultants
Geoton Pty Ltd ABN 81 129 764 629
PO Box 522 Prospect TAS 7250
Unit 24, 16-18 Goodman Court
Invermay TAS 7248
Tel (+61) (3) 6326 5001
www.geoton.com.au
13 November 2019
Reference No. GL19487Ab
Mr Mark James
14 Denison Grove
WEST LAUNCESTON TAS 7250
Dear Sir
RE: Coastal Erosion Hazard Assessment, Site Classification & On-site

Wastewater Assessment and Design
29 (Lot 6) Foreshore Road, Kelso
We have pleasure in submitting herein our report detailing the results of the
geotechnical investigation conducted at the above site.
Should you require clarification of any aspect of this report, please contact Anne Foster
or the undersigned on (03) 6326 5001.
For and on behalf of Geoton Pty Ltd
Tony Barriera
Director – Principal Geotechnical Engineer
Coastal Erosion Hazard Assessment, Site Classification & On-site Wastewater Assessment
and Design
1 INTRODUCTION
A limited scope investigation has been conducted for Mr Mark James at the site of a
proposed residential development at 29 (Lot 6) Foreshore Road, Kelso.
The purpose of the investigation was to assess the following:
• The risk posed by coastal erosion and inundation to the site of the proposed
development in accordance with the West Tamar Interim Planning Scheme
2013 Clauses E5 and E14;
• The general subsurface conditions at the site and consequently assign a Site
Classification in accordance with AS 2870 – 2011 “Residential Slabs and
Footings”;
• The surrounding topography and provide a Wind Classification in accordance
with AS 4055 – 2012 “Wind Loads for Housing”; and
• The suitability of the site for disposal of domestic wastewater and the design of
an on-site wastewater disposal system in accordance with AS/NZS 1547:2012
“On-site domestic wastewater management”.
1.1 Proposed Development

A preliminary site plan of the proposed development was provided showing the location
of the proposed dwelling, prepared by S Group, dated 27 September 2019.
We understand the development will be a three-bedroom dwelling with all living areas
elevated above a secure carport.
2 FIELD INVESTIGATION
The field investigation was conducted on 24 October 2019 and involved the drilling of
4 boreholes by 4WD mounted auger rig to the auger refusal depths of 1.9m to 2.7m.
Dynamic Cone Penetration (DCP) tests were conducted in the granular soils
encountered in the investigation. In addition, the permeability of the site was tested
using a constant head permeameter.
The results of the field tests are shown on the borehole logs.
The logs of the boreholes are included in Appendix A and their locations are shown on
Figure 1 attached.
3 SITE CONDITIONS
The site is located to the southwest of the Tamar River and is currently vacant. The
ground surface over the site generally has a gentle fall towards the northeast in the
rear south-western portion of the site, becoming near level within the front north-
eastern portion of the site extending to the river. The site is vegetated with a low cover
of grass with garden beds and a small tree in the rear portion of the site (Plate 1).
Along the northeast front of the site there is a bitumen road, in good condition (Plate 2),
then approximately 1 metre of grassed area with an erosional scarp 0.2m to 0.5m high
Geoton Pty Ltd 1

GL19487Ab
13 November 2019
and Design
onto the beach (Plate 3). Directly to the southeast of the site, the erosional scarp where
the beach meets the foreshore has been protected using rocks and a low concrete wall
(Plate 4). The beach comprises sand with exposed cobbles in places (Plate 5).
The MRT Digital Geological Atlas 1:25,000 Series, indicates that the site is located on
Cretaceous aged sediments comprising dominantly non-marine sequences of gravel,
sand, silt, clay and regolith. Our investigation indicated that Quaternary aged beach
sands overlie the Cretaceous aged sediments.
Examination of the LIST Landslide Planning Map – Hazard Bands Overlay, indicates
that the site is not located within a known landslide hazard band.
The investigation indicated that the soil profile is relatively uniform across the site.
Boreholes BH1 and BH2 generally encountered silty sand/sandy silt topsoil to depths of
0.2m to 0.4m, overlying sand/silty sand to depths of 1.6m, overlying clayey/sandy silt to
depths of 2.2m to 2.4m, underlain by silty sand to the auger refusal depths of 2.5m to
2.7m on inferred highly weathered rock. Boreholes BH3 and BH4 encountered
sand/silty sand topsoil to depths of 0.2m, overlying sand to depths of 0.8m, underlain
by clayey silt to the auger refusal depths of 1.9m on inferred highly weathered rock.
Boreholes BH1 and BH2 encountered groundwater measured at depths of 1.2m and
2.0m respectively.
Full details of soil conditions encountered are presented on the borehole logs.
4 COASTAL EROSION ASSESSMENT

4.1 Climate Change Susceptibility
To assist communities to plan for climate change and adapt to its impact, the
Tasmanian Government has developed sea level rise planning allowances and coastal
hazards maps. The maps have been produced by the Department of Premier and
Cabinet (DPAC) and are available as map layers online via the Land Information
Systems Tasmania (the LIST) site.
The Tasmanian sea level rise planning allowances will ensure all planning for the
State's coastal areas consistently allow for sea level rise relative to 2010 of 0.2 metres
by 2050 and 0.8 metres by 2100.
Examination of the LISTMap Coastal Vulnerability – Projected Sea Level Rise,
indicates that the site is located outside the predicted sea level rise for 2050 hazard
band. The north-eastern portion of the site is within the predicted sea level rise for 2100
hazard band (Figure 2).
Examination of the LISTMap Coastal Vulnerability – Projected Storm Tide, indicates
that a small portion within the centre of the site is located within the predicted Storm
Tide 1% Average Exceedance Probability (AEP) for 2010. Additionally, the north-
eastern portion of the site is within the 1% AEP for 2050 and the majority of the site is
within the 1% AEP for 2100 tidal events.
Geoton Pty Ltd 2

GL19487Ab
13 November 2019
and Design
4.2 Coastal Vulnerability

The Coastal Vulnerability mapping series provides a general geomorphic description of
the shoreline type around Tasmania’s coast, together with an indicative (‘first pass’)
assessment of the vulnerability of each coastal segment to erosion and recession due
to sea level rise.
Examination of the LISTMap Coastal Vulnerability - Soft Shores mapping indicates that
the beach adjacent to the site is an open sandy shore backed by bedrock with potential
beach erosion and lesser recession vulnerability.
Examination of the LISTMap Coastal Vulnerability - Coastal Erosion Component
indicates the north-eastern portion of the site is mapped within a high hazard zone, with
the south-western portion of the site mapped within a low hazard zone (Figure 3).
Examination of the LISTMap Coastal Vulnerability - Coastal Erosion Hazard Bands
indicates that the north-eastern portion of the site is mapped within a high coastal
erosion hazard band, i.e. the area is vulnerable to storm-based erosion from two back
to back 1% AEP storm events. The remainder of the site is mapped within a low hazard
band, i.e. the area is vulnerable to a coastal recession by 2100 based on the elevation,
soil, or rock type of the area and current sea level rise models (Figure 4).
Examination of the LISTMap Coastal Vulnerability - Coastal Inundation Hazard Bands
indicates that the north-western two thirds of the site is mapped within a medium
coastal inundation hazard band, i.e. the area is vulnerable to a 1% AEP storm event in
2050 and inundation from mean high tide by 2100. The remainder of the site is mapped
within a low hazard band, i.e. the area is vulnerable to a 1% AEP storm event in 2100
(Figure 5).
4.3 Coastal Erosion

Coastal erosion is defined as the removal of land by water, wind and general weather
conditions. There are three aspects of coastal erosion defined by DPAC in the Coastal
Hazards in Tasmania: Summary report of Coastal Hazard Technical Report (DPAC,
2016):
• Hazardous Erosion of the coastline occurs on open, soft and sandy coasts;
• Coastal recession is the long-term movement of land due to sea level rise and
typically occurs on both soft sandy and tertiary sediment coasts; and
• Landslide is the downslope movement of land; on the coast, landslide is
typically caused by the removal of material at the foot of the landslide by wave
or storm action.
From the coastal erosion hazard planning matrix (Section 6.3 from DPAC Coastal
Hazards Technical Report – Mitigating Natural Hazards through Land Use Planning
and Building Control) for high Hazard Bands, planning and building controls are
necessary for all use and development to ensure that risks are managed. For low
Hazard Bands, planning and building controls are not necessary for most uses.
Controls may be necessary to reduce risks associated with vulnerable, hazardous or
critical uses to ensure the residual risk is tolerable.
Geoton Pty Ltd 3

GL19487Ab
13 November 2019
and Design
From the identified hazard zones, based on the defined coastal substrate categories
(sheltered coast soft sediment shore), a single hazard susceptibility scheme has been
developed which incorporates an assessment of the relative hazards posed by the
various hazard zones within each substrate type.
The proposed development is to be located within the central portion of the site in
which the substrate is mapped within low and high coastal erosion hazard components.
The existing foreshore to the northeast of the site has an erosional scarp of between
0.2m and 0.5m high. The foreshore to the southeast of this area has been protected by
rocks and a cement wall. A review of available historical imagery from 2002 to 2017
gave no indication of significant erosion of the beach adjacent to the site occurring. The
proposed development is to be approximately 0.5m above the current mean high-water
mark and set back 25m.
Considering these factors (i.e. the development’s horizontal and vertical
setbacks from the coastline, the existing state of the coastline and inferred
erosion action) it is deemed that the corresponding qualitative risks presented
by coastal erosion on the proposed development are HIGH.
Therefore, the following development controls are required for the site:
• The foundations of the proposed development are to be founded into highly
weathered rock or better;
• The habitable rooms in the dwelling are to be on the upper storey; and
• The septic tank and land application area are to be located within the low
hazard zone in the rear southwestern portion of the site as shown in Figure 1.
Additionally, the septic tank is to be weighted down to counter any potential
buoyancy effects.
If the above development controls are put in place, the corresponding qualitative
risk presented by coastal erosion to the proposed development is assessed to
be LOW.
Note: Further coastal protection works are deemed inappropriate due to the scale and
cost they would incur relative to the proposed development. To be effective, remedial
measures would need to encompass the entire foreshore of Kelso Beach so as not to
focus the effects of sea level rise and extreme weather events.
4.4 Coastal Inundation

Permanent Inundation as a result of progressive shoreline erosion and sea-level rise, is
predicted on the basis of the geomorphic description of the adjacent shoreline.
4.4.1 Temporary Inundation

Temporary inundation from storm tide events are infrequent events, but the effects on
life and property can be dramatic. Unlike coastal erosion and permanent loss of land
from sea level rise, storm tides inundate areas over a period of hours or days. Rising
sea levels will be most noticeable during extreme sea level events such as king tides.
Geoton Pty Ltd 4

GL19487Ab
13 November 2019
and Design
People and developments located on land that is flooded to a depth of a metre or more
during a defined storm-tide event are at significant risk. This is due to the water depth
being sufficient to generate damaging waves and the strength of the tidal flows.
Examination of the DPAC Projected Storm Tide mapping for the 1%AEP for 2010
indicates that the front portion of the proposed development is predicted to be within an
area of potential temporary inundation by storm tides. Mapping for the 1% AEP for
2050 (0.2m sea level rise) indicates that the majority of the proposed development is
predicted to be within an area of potential temporary inundation by storm tides, and
mapping for the 1% AEP for 2100 (0.8m sea level rise) indicates that almost the entire
site is predicted to be within an area of potential temporary inundation by storm tides.
4.4.2 Permanent Inundation

Permanent inundation will result from sea level rise and as shoreline erosion events
occur from which the original extent of the foreshore never recovers.
Examination of the DPAC Projected Sea Level Rise mapping for the 2050 scenario
(0.2m sea level rise) and 2100 scenario (0.8m sea level rise) indicate the site is not
within an area of potential permanent inundation by sea level rise by 2050, but the
majority of the proposed development is within an area of potential permanent
inundation by 2100.
5 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the findings of the recent investigation and the above Coastal Erosion and
Inundation Risk Assessment, and the required development controls, we consider that
the proposed residential development within the central portion of the site may be
adversely impacted by Coastal Erosion. Additionally, it is considered that the site will
be adversely impacted by temporary and permanent Coastal Inundation.
The proposed development is identified as being within the areas identified at risk for
temporary and permanent inundation. Minor active erosion of the sediments along the
foreshore to the northeast was identified, and the proposed development is located
within high to low erosional hazard zones.
As the habitable rooms are to be located on the upper storey with footings hardened by
founding into bedrock, the proposed development satisfies the inundation criteria
defined by DPAC and the requirements of the West Tamar Interim Planning Scheme
2013.
As such, in accordance with the West Tamar Interim Planning scheme 2013, the
likelihood of the proposed development being affected by projected shoreline recession
and inundation to 2069 (50 year design life) is considered ACCEPTABLE.
Geoton Pty Ltd 5

GL19487Ab
13 November 2019
and Design
6 SITE CLASSIFICATION
After allowing due consideration of the site geology, drainage, soil conditions and the
founding of the footings into bedrock to protect against coastal erosion, the site has
been classified as follows:
CLASS A (AS 2870)
Foundation designs in accordance with this classification are to be subject to the
overriding conditions of foundation section below.
This Classification is applicable only for ground conditions encountered at the time of
this investigation. If cut or fill earthworks are carried out, then the Site Classification
will need to be re-assessed, and possibly changed.
7 FOUNDATIONS
Particular attention should be paid to the design of footings as required by AS 2870 –
2011.
In addition to normal founding requirements arising from the above classification,
particular conditions at this site dictate that the founding medium for all footings would
be as follows:
BEDROCK – highly weathered or better
encountered below 2.5m to 2.7m from the existing ground surface
An allowable bearing pressure of 500 kPa is available for displacement piles or bored
piers founded as above. Bored piers will require the use of temporary or permanent
liners due to the presence of groundwater and the boreholes collapsing.
Although the borehole data provides an indication of subsurface conditions at the site,
variations in soil conditions may occur in areas of the site not specifically covered by
the field investigation. The base of all footing or beam excavations should therefore be
inspected to ensure that the founding medium meets the requirements referenced
herein with respect to type and strength of founding material.
8 WIND CLASSIFICATION
After allowing due consideration of the region, terrain, shielding and topography, the
site has been classified as follows:
WIND CLASSIFICATION N3 (AS 4055)
REGION TERRAIN SHIELDING TOPOGRAPHY

CATEGORY
A TC1 NS T0
Geoton Pty Ltd 6

GL19487Ab
13 November 2019
and Design
9 EFFLUENT DISPOSAL
The AS/NZS 1547:2012 standard provides a guide for typical wastewater flow
allowances under a range of circumstances. As a general guide, the standard
recommends a typical wastewater flow of 120 litres/person/day for households on tank
water. As the dwelling is 3 bedrooms with a population equivalent of 5, a value of
600L/day has been adopted.
9.1 Permeability of Soil and Soil Category

The soil has been classified as follows:
• Texture - Sand (Table E1 from AS1547-2012);
• Structure - Massive (Table E4 from AS/NZS1547-2012); and
• Category - 1 (Table E1 from AS/NZS1547:2012).
For Category 1 soils the indicative permeability from AS/NZS 1547 Table 5.1 is
>3.0m/day.
• Measured Permeability – >6.0m/day; and
• Adopted Permeability – >6.0m/day.
9.2 Disposal and Treatment Method

Due to the environmental limitations (being close to the Tamar River) the site is
not suitable for a primary treated system as the setback distances are not
acceptable.
As such, the site assessment indicates that the site requires secondary treated effluent
as this will create an acceptable viral dieback distance. The site is suitable for the
disposal of domestic effluent by way of the following methods:
• Aerated Wastewater Treatment System (AWTS) with subsurface/surface
irrigation;
• Eljen Geotextile Sand Filter (GSF) system via a septic tank with a minimum
capacity of 3000L; and
• Advanced Enviro-Septic (AES) system via a septic tank with a minimum
capacity of 3000L.
The client has opted for an Advanced Enviro-Septic system.
As the wastewater disposal field is upslope from the dwelling a pump and pump pit will
be required to transport the wastewater from the septic tank to the AES system.
It is recommended that the pump is hard wired into the dwelling and comes fitted with
audible and visual high-water alarms. The alarms will notify of a failing submersible
pump or plugged line, which causes the liquid level to rise in your septic tank.
9.3 Design Loading Rate

From Table L1 (AS1547-2012) for Category 1 soils the adopted design loading rate for
secondary treated effluent has been set at 50mm/day.
Geoton Pty Ltd 7

GL19487Ab
13 November 2019
and Design
9.4 AES System

The required area for the AES disposal field is calculated using the following equation:
A= Q__
DLR
A = Area in m2
Q = Design daily flow in L/day
DLR = Design Loading Rate in mm/day
As the design loading rate has been set at 50mm/day and the daily flow (Q) has been
set at 600L/day, when the parameters are inserted into the above equation the
minimum area required for the effluent disposal field is 12m2.
To satisfy the required disposal field the AES Design Calculator has been utilised to
determine the required AES design dimensions. A copy of the approved AES Design
Calculator certificate is provided in Appendix B. The AES Design Calculator indicates
that the disposal field is required to comprise the following:
• 2 rows of 3 AES pipes with an AES pipe area of 13m2.
There is adequate area for effluent disposal on site.
There is adequate reserve (back-up) area of 13m2.
The AES system is to be constructed as per the cross section detailed on Figure 6
attached. The design details for the disposal field are as follows:
• The sand required for the AES system is required to meet the AES grading
envelopes for System Sand. Refer to the AES website (www.enviro-
septic.com.au) for the approved AES System Sand provider list.
The risk management process is an inherent part of the on-site wastewater disposal
design. The onsite wastewater disposal system has been designed by considering the
site characteristics and with risk identification in accordance with AS1547-2012. The
risk reduction measures are detailed in the report.
9.5 Setbacks
The minimum separation distance between the disposal area and downslope features
is based on Appendix R from AS/NZS 1547:2012 “Recommended Setback Distances
for Land Application Systems”. As per Table R1 from AS/NZS 1547:2012 a setback of
17m is required from downslope watercourse and sensitive features. A setback of 2.5m
is required from downslope property boundaries, a setback of 1.5m is required from up-
slope and cross-slope property boundaries and a setback of 3.75m is required from
downslope buildings.
9.6 Wastewater Recommendations

It is recommended that the following actions are undertaken in looking after your
system:
Geoton Pty Ltd 8

GL19487Ab
13 November 2019
and Design
• Septic tanks must be pumped out at least every 3 to 5 years or more frequently
depending on usage;
• Minimise domestic water use;
• Minimise the use of non-biodegradable detergents;
• Minimise the use of detergents containing phosphorous (eg calgon and similar);
• Avoid discharging polluting chemicals into wastewater systems; and
• Monitor quality of groundwater.
10 REFERENCES
AS 1726 - 2017 Geotechnical Site Investigations
AS 2870 - 2011 Residential Slabs and Footings Construction
AS 4055 - 2012 Wind Loads for Housing
AS/NZS 1547- 2012 On-site domestic-wastewater management
Tasmanian Climate Change Office (August 2012) – Derivation of the Tasmanian Sea
Level Rise Planning Allowances – Technical Paper
DPAC Coastal Erosion Hazard Bands Layer (The LIST)
DPAC Coastal Inundation Hazard Bands Layer (The LIST)
Sharples.C, Walford.H and Roberts.L (October 2013) – Coastal Erosion Susceptibility
Zone Mapping for Hazard Band Definition in Tasmania, Report to DPAC.
DPAC Coastal Hazards Technical Report – Mitigating Natural Hazards through Land
Use Planning and Building Control – 1st December 2016
DPAC Coastal Hazards in Tasmania Summary Report – Consultation Draft released
1st of March 2016
West Tamar Interim Planning Scheme 2013
Geoton Pty Ltd 9

GL19487Ab
13 November 2019
and Design
Attachments:
Limitations of report
Figure 1 – Site Plan
Figure 2 – Coastal Projected Sea Level Rise
Figure 3 – Coastal Erosion Components
Figure 4 – Coastal Erosion Hazard Bands
Figure 5 – Coastal Inundation Hazard Bands
Figure 6 – AES Section
Figure 7 – Cross Section
Site Photographs
Appendix A: Borehole Logs & Explanation Sheets
Appendix B: Certificate Forms
Geoton Pty Ltd 10

GL19487Ab
13 November 2019
Geotechnical Consultants - Limitations of report
These notes have been prepared to assist in the interpretation and understanding of the limitations of
this report.
Project specific criteria Report Recommendations
The report has been developed on the basis of The report is based on the assumption that the
unique project specific requirements as site conditions as revealed through selective point
understood by Geoton and applies only to the site sampling are indicative of actual conditions
investigated. Project criteria are typically throughout an area. This assumption cannot be
identified in the Client brief and the associated substantiated until earthworks and/or foundation
proposal prepared by Geoton and may include construction is almost complete and therefore the
risk factors arising from limitations on scope report recommendations can only be regarded as
imposed by the Client. The report should not be preliminary. Where variations in conditions are
used without further consultation if significant encountered, further advice should be sought.
changes to the project occur. No responsibility for
Specific purposes
problems that might occur due to changed factors
will be accepted without consultation.
This report should not be applied to any project
other than that originally specified at the time the
Subsurface variations with time
report was issued.
Because a report is based on conditions which Interpretation by others

existed at the time of subsurface exploration,
decisions should not be based on a report whose Geoton will not be responsible for interpretations
adequacy may have been affected by time. For of site data or the report findings by others
example, water levels can vary with time, fill may involved in the design and construction process.
be placed on a site and pollutants may migrate Where any confusion exists, clarification should
with time. In the event of significant delays in the be sought from Geoton.
commencement of a project, further advice
Report integrity
should be sought.
Interpretation of factual data The report as a whole presents the findings of the
site assessment and the report should not be
Site assessment identifies actual subsurface copied in part or altered in any way.
conditions only at those points where samples
Geoenvironmental issues
are taken and at the time they are taken. All
available data is interpreted by professionals to
This report does not cover issues of site
provide an opinion about overall site conditions,
contamination unless specifically required to do
their likely impact on the proposed development
so by the client. In the absence of such a
and recommended actions. Actual conditions may
request, Geoton take no responsibility for such
differ from those inferred to exist, as it is virtually
issues.
impossible to provide a definitive subsurface
profile which includes all the possible variabilities
inherent in soil and rock masses.
Geoton Pty Ltd

CONVENTIONAL SYSTEM CONFIGURATION
SCALE 1:50@A3
6 x AES PIPES INSPECTION POINT

SEE DETAIL 1
HIGH VENT Ø 50mm

LOW VENT
VELOCITY REDUCER IS REQUIRED

DUE TO EFFLUENT BEING PUMPED
INTO SYSTEM
LOW VENT Ø 100mm TREE/STAKE/BUILDING
INSPECTION POINT
FINISH SURFACE WITH
TURF/GRASS
MINIMUM 3000mm
NATURAL GROUND
DETAIL 1
SYSTEM SAND
(COARSE RIVER SAND)
LOW VENT Ø 100mm
DETAIL 2
SCALE 1:20 @A3 EFFLUENT LINE
FROM PUMP
HIGH VENT DETAIL
client:
MR MARK JAMES
project:
29 (LOT 6) FORESHORE ROAD
KELSO
date 13/11/2019 drawn AF
scale As Shown approved title:
TB AES SECTION AND PLAN
original rev project no: figure no.
size A3 GL19487A 6
TAMAR RIVER N
MEAN HIGH WATER MARK
1.0
Rocks m
FO
RE Cement
SH Wall
OR
E
RO
AD
2.0m
2.0m
PROPOSED’
DRIVEWAY
BH 1
NEAR NOTES
LEVEL
PLUMBING CONNECTIONS
TO BE CARRIED OUT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH
PLUMBING CODES AND
AES SEE FIGURE 2 REGULATIONS
PROPOSED
DWELLING VENTS, OVERFLOW RELIEF
BH 4 GULLY AND INSPECTION
OPENINGS TO BE PROVIDED
AS PER THE PLUMBING
CODES AND REGULATIONS
AES TO BE SET BACK:

1O-2O - 17m FROM DOWNHILL
BH 2 SENSITIVE FEATURES SUCH
AS WATERCOURSES,
- 3m FROM UP-SLOPE OR
CROSS-SLOPE BUILDINGS,
- 3.75m FROM DOWNSLOPE
BUILDINGS,
- 1.5m FROM UP-SLOPE OR
CROSS-SLOPE PROPERTY
BH 3 3000L SEPTIC TANK BOUNDARIES,
- 2.5m FROM DOWNSLOPE
PUMP PIT AND PUMP PROPERTY BOUNDARIES,
AND
- 3m FROM DOWNSLOPE
RESERVE AREA CUT/FILL BATTERS.
13m2
3.0
m
Legend Approximate Scale (m)

0 5 10 15 20
BH 1
Approximate Borehole Location
5O
Approximate Slope Angle client: MR MARK JAMES
project:
KELSO
Approximate Change in Slope date 13/11/2019 drawn AF
scale title: SITE PLAN

As Shown approved TB
original project no: figure no.
size
A3 rev GL19487A 1
FO BEACH
RE
SH
OR
E
RO
AD
LI ED
NG
EL OS
DW OP
PR
Legend
Predicted Sea Level Rise 2100 Approximate Scale (m)

0 5 10 15 20
client: MR MARK JAMES
project:
KELSO
scale title: COASTAL PROJECTED SEA LEVEL RISE

A4 rev GL19487A 2
size
BEACH
N
FO
RE
SH
OR
E
RO
AD
LI ED
NG
EL OS
DW OP
PR
Legend
Acceptable Hazard Zone -
Coastal Erosion Component
Low Hazard Zone -

Coastal Erosion Component Approximate Scale (m)
High Hazard Zone -
Coastal Erosion Component 0 5 10 15 20
project:
KELSO
scale title: COASTAL EROSION COMPONENT

A4 rev GL19487A 3
size
N FO
RE
BEACH
SH
OR
E
RO
AD
LI ED
NG
EL OS
DW OP
PR
Legend
Low Hazard Zone -
Coastal Erosion Hazard Bands Approximate Scale (m)
High Hazard Zone -
Coastal Erosion Hazard Bands 0 5 10 15 20
project:
KELSO
scale title: COASTAL EROSION HAZARD BANDS

size
A4 rev GL19487A 4
N FO
RE
BEACH
SH
OR
E
RO
AD
LI ED
NG
EL OS
DW OP
PR
Legend
Low Hazard Zone -
Coastal Inundation Hazard Bands Approximate Scale (m)
Medium Hazard Zone -
Coastal InundationHazard Bands 0 5 10 15 20
project:
KELSO
scale title: COASTAL INUNDATION HAZARD BANDS

A4 rev GL19487A 5
size
SW NE
PROPOSED DWELLING - HABITABLE ROOMS
TITLE BOUNDARY
4

LAND APPLICATION
AREA
PROPOSED DWELLING - CARPORT

ELEVATION (m)
PUMP AND SEPTIC

PUMP PIT TANK
2 QUATERNARY SEDIMENTS
0
CRETACEOUS SEDIMENTS
BEDROCK
30 40 50 60 70
10 20
0
DISTANCE (m)
client:
MR MARK JAMES
project:
KELSO
scale As Shown approved title:
TB CROSS SECTION
original rev project no: figure no.
size A3 GL19487A 7
PLATE 1 - View of the site looking to the west
PLATE 2 - View of the road adjacent to the site looking to the northwest

project:
title: KELSO
PHOTOGRAPH
date: original project no: figure no.
24/10/2019 size
A4 GL19487A PLATES 1 & 2
PLATE 3 - View of erosional scarp along the foreshore adjacent to the site
PLATE 4 - View of foreshore protected by rocks to the southeast of the site

project:
title: KELSO
PHOTOGRAPH
24/10/2019 size
A4 GL19487A PLATES 3 & 4
PLATE 5 - View of the beach looking to the north

project:
title: KELSO
PHOTOGRAPH
24/10/2019 size
A4 GL19487A PLATES 5
Appendix A
Borehole Logs
ENGINEERING
BOREHOLE LOG
Geotechnical Consultants Borehole no. BH1
PO Box 522 Prospect TAS 7250 Sheet no. 1 of 1
Unit 24, 16-18 Goodman Court, Invermay TAS Job no. GL19487A
T (03) 6326 5001
Client : Mr Mark James Date : 24/10/19
Project : Coastal Erosion, Site Classification & Onsite Wastewater Assessment Logged By : AF
Location : 29 (Lot 6) Foreshore Road, Kelso
Drill model : Drilltech Easting: Slope: 90O RL Surface :
Hole diameter : 150mm Northing: Bearing: - Datum :
Consistency density,
Moisture condition
Notes
Penetration
Graphic log
Classification
Support
Samples
Method
Symbol
Water
Depth Structure, additional
index
Tests Material Description
(m) observations
DCP
1 TOPSOIL - Silty Sand, medium D L
3 grained, brown
4 SW SAND - fine to medium grained, D MD
7 brown
6 0.50
5
9 Becoming fine to coarse grained M
10 sand, grey, with fine gravel, trace clay
4
4 1.00
5
8 Groundwater measured
ADV
7 1 hour after drilling @ 1.2m

N
7 Increased gravel
20 1.50 W D Borehole collapsed
20
ML Clayey SILT - low plasticity, brown, M St
with fine gravel
2.00
ML Sandy SILT - low plasticity, brown, W D W≈LL
fine to coarse grained sand
Cobbles 2.2m - 2.4m
2.50 SM Silty SAND - fine to coarse grained, W D

brown
Borehole BH1 refusal @ 2.5m on
inferred highly weathered rock
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
ENGINEERING
BOREHOLE LOG
T (03) 6326 5001
Moisture condition
Penetration
Graphic log
Classification
Support
Notes
Method
Symbol
Water
index
Samples Material Description
(m) observations
Tests
TOPSOIL - Sandy Silt, low plasticity, M L

black
0.50 SM Silty SAND - fine to medium grained, M MD

grey, shell fragments
Becoming fine grained, brown, with W

1.00 fine to coarse gravel
ADV
N
1.50
ML Clayey SILT - low plasticity, brown M VSt

mottled green and grey, with coarse
grained sand and fine gravel
2.00 V=refusal
Groundwater measured
0.5 hour after drilling @ 2.0m
SM Silty SAND - fine to medium grained, W D
brown, low plasticity fines, trace
2.50 fine gravel, cobbles

3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
ENGINEERING
BOREHOLE LOG
T (03) 6326 5001
Moisture condition
Penetration
Graphic log
density, index
Classification
Consistency
Notes
Support
Method
Symbol
Water

(m) observations
Tests
TOPSOIL - Sand, fine to coarse D L

grained, brown, with shell fragments
SW SAND - fine to coarse grained, light D MD
brown, with shell fragments, trace
0.50 fine gravel
M
MH Clayey SILT - high plasticity, brown, M St W<PL

ADV
1.00 trace fine gravel, cobbles

N
ML Clayey SILT - low plasticity, brown, M St W<PL

with fine gravel and medium grained
1.50 sand
2.00 Borehole BH3 refusal @ 1.9m on

2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
ENGINEERING
BOREHOLE LOG
T (03) 6326 5001
Moisture condition
Penetration
Graphic log
Classification
Support
Notes
Method
Symbol
Water
index
(m) observations
Tests
TOPSOIL - Silty Sand, fine grained, D L

grey
SW SAND - fine to coarse grained, light D MD
brown, with shell fragments, trace
0.50 fine gravel
ML Clayey SILT - low plasticity, brown, M St

ADV
1.00 with fine to coarse gravel, cobbles

N
1.50
2.00 Borehole BH4 refusal @ 1.9m on

2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
Investigation Log Explanation Sheet
METHOD – BOREHOLE NOTES, SAMPLES, TESTS
TERM Description TERM Description
AS Auger Screwing* U50 Undisturbed sample 50 mm diameter
AD Auger Drilling* U63 Undisturbed sample 63 mm diameter
RR Roller / Tricone D Disturbed sample
W Washbore N Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
CT Cable Tool N* SPT – sample recovered
HA Hand Auger NC SPT with solid cone
DT Diatube V Vane Shear
B Blank Bit PP Pocket Penetrometer
V V Bit P Pressumeter
T TC Bit BS Bulk sample
* Bit shown by suffix e.g. ADT
E Environmental Sample
METHOD – EXCAVATION R Refusal
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer
TERM Description DCP
(blows/100mm)
N Natural exposure PL Plastic Limit
LL Liquid Limit
X Existing excavation
LS Linear Shrinkage
H Backhoe bucket
B Bulldozer blade CLASSIFICATION SYMBOLS AND SOIL

DESCRIPTION
R Ripper
Based on AS 1726:2017
E Excavator
MOISTURE
SUPPORT
TERM Description
TERM Description
D Dry
M Mud
M Moist
N Nil
W Wet
C Casing
S Shoring CONSISTENCY/DENSITY INDEX

TERM Description
PENETRATION
VS very soft
1 2 3 4
S soft
No resistance
ranging to F firm
Refusal
St stiff
WATER
VSt very stiff
Symbol Description
H hard
Water inflow Fr friable
Water outflow VL very loose
L loose
17/3/08 water on date shown
MD medium dense
D dense
VD Very dense
Soil Description Explanation Sheet (1of 2)
DEFINITION RELATIVE DENSITY OF NON-COHESIVE SOILS
In engineering terms, soil includes every type of uncemented or TERM DENSITY INDEX (%)
partially cemented inorganic or organic material found in the
Very Loose ≤15
ground. In practice, if the material can be remoulded or
Loose 15 to 35
disintegrated by hand in its field condition or in water it is
Medium Dense 35 to 65
described as a soil. Other materials are described using rock
Dense 65 to 85
description terms.
Very Dense > 85
CLASSIFICATION SYMBOL AND SOIL NAME
DESCRIPTIVE TERMS FOR ACCESSORY SOIL
Soils are described in accordance with the AS 1726: 2017 as COMPONENTS
shown in the table on Sheet 2.
IN COARSE IN FINE
DESIGNATION
COMPONENT
PARTICLE SIZE DEFINITIONS GRAINED GRAINED
SOILS SOILS
OF
NAME SUBDIVISION SIZE (mm) TERM
BOULDERS >200 % Accessory
% Sand/
COBBLES 63 to 200 % Fines coarse
gravel
fraction
Coarse 19 to 63
GRAVEL Medium 6.7 to 19 ≤5 ≤15 ≤15 Trace
Minor
Fine 2.36 to 6.7 >5, ≤12 >15, ≤30 >15, ≤30 With
Coarse 0.6 to 2.36 Secondary >12 >30 >30 Prefix
SAND Medium 0.21 to 0.6
Fine 0.075 to 0.21 SOIL STRUCTURE
SILT 0.002 to 0.075 ZONING CEMENTING
CLAY <0.002 Layer Continuous across Weakly Easily
the exposure or cemented disaggregated
MOISTURE CONDITION sample. by hand in air
Coarse Grained Soils or water.
Lens Discontinuous layer
Dry Non-cohesive and free running. of different material,
Moist Soil feels cool, darkened in colour. with lenticular shape. Moderately Effort is
Soil tends to stick together. cemented required to
Wet As for moist but with free water forming when Pocket An irregular inclusion disaggregate
handling. of different material. the soil by
hand in air or
Fine Grained Soils
water.
Moist, dry of Plastic Limited – w < PL
Hard and friable or powdery. GEOLOGICAL ORIGIN
Moist, near Plastic Limit – w ≈ PL
Soils can be moulded at a moisture content WEATHERED IN PLACE SOILS
approximately equal to the plastic limit.
Extremely Structure and/or fabric of parent rock
Moist, wet of Plastic Limit – w > PL
weathered material retained and visible.
Soils usually weakened and free water forms on
material
hands when handling.
Wet, near Liquid Limit - w ≈ LL Residual soil Structure and/or fabric of parent rock
Wet, wet of Liquid Limit - w > LL material not retained and visible.
CONSISTENCY TERMS FOR COHESIVE SOILS TRANSPORTED SOILS
UNDRAINED Aeolian soil Carried and deposited by wind.

TERM STRENGTH FIELD GUIDE Alluvial soil Deposited by streams and rivers.
su (kPa)
Colluvial soil Soil and rock debris transported downslope
Exudes between the fingers when
Very Soft ≤12 by gravity.
squeezed in hand
Can be moulded by light finger Estuarine soil Deposited in coastal estuaries, and
Soft 12 to 25 including sediments carried by inflowing
pressure
rivers and streams, and tidal currents.
Can be moulded by strong finger
Firm 25 to 50
pressure Fill Man-made deposit. Fill may be significantly
Stiff 50 to 100 Cannot be moulded by fingers more variable between tested locations
Very Stiff 100 to 200 Can be indented by thumb nail than naturally occurring soils.
Can be indented with difficulty by Lacustrine soil Deposited in freshwater lakes.
Hard >200
thumb nail
Marine soil Deposited in a marine environment.
Can be easily crumbled or broken
Friable –
into small pieces by hand
Soil Description Explanation Sheet (2 of 2)
SOIL CLASSIFICATION INCLUDING IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
FIELD IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES GROUP
PRIMARY NAME
(Excluding particles larger than 63 mm and basing fractions on estimated mass) SYMBOL
Wide range in grain size and substantial
GW GRAVEL
GRAVEL
no fines)
(Little or
CLEAN
amounts of all intermediate particle sizes
larger than 2.36 mm

coarse fraction is
More than half of Predominantly one size or a range of sizes
More than 65% of soil excluding oversize
GP GRAVEL
GRAVEL
with some intermediate sizes missing

fraction is larger than 0.075 mm
WITH FINES
(Appreciable
Non-plastic fines (for identification procedures
(A 0.075 mm particle is about the smallest particle visible to naked eyes)
COARSE GRAINED SOIL
GM Silty GRAVEL
GRAVEL
of fines)
amount
see ML and MH below)
Plastic fines (for identification procedures see

GC Clayey GRAVEL
CL, CI and CH below)

no fines) SW SAND
(Little or
CLEAN
SAND
amounts of all intermediate sizes

smaller than 2.36 mm
coarse fraction is
More than half of
Predominantly one size or a range of sizes

SP SAND
SAND

WITH FINES
(Appreciable

SM Silty SAND
of fines)
amount
SAND

SC Clayey SAND
IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES ON FRACTIONS <0.075 mm

fraction is smaller than 0.075 mm
DRY STRENGTH DILATANCY TOUGHNESS

SILT & CLAY
None to Low Slow to Rapid Low ML SILT

plasticity,
FINE GRAINED SOIL
LL ≤ 50)
medium
(low to
Medium to High None to Slow Medium CL, CI CLAY
Low to Medium Slow Low OL ORGANIC SILT

SILT & CLAY
Low to Medium None to Slow Low to Medium MH SILT

plasticity,
LL > 50)
(high
High to Very High None High CH CLAY
Medium to High None to Very Slow Low to Medium OH ORGANIC CLAY
Highly Organic Readily identified by colour, odour, spongy feel and frequently by
Pt PEAT
Soil fibrous texture.
● LL – Liquid Limit.
COMMON DEFECTS IN SOILS

TERM DEFINITION DIAGRAM TERM DEFINITION DIAGRAM
PARTING A surface or crack across which the SOFTENED A zone in clayey soil, usually
soil has little or no tensile strength. ZONE adjacent to a defect in which the
Parallel or sub parallel to layering soil has a higher moisture content
than elsewhere.
(e.g. bedding). May be open or
closed.
FISSURE A surface or crack across which the TUBE Tubular cavity. May occur singly or
soil has little or no tensile strength, as one of a large number of
but which is not parallel or sub separate or inter-connected tubes.
parallel to layering. May be open or Walls often coated with clay or
closed. May include desiccation strengthened by denser packing of
cracks. grains. May contain organic matter.
SHEARED Zone in clayey soil with roughly TUBE An infilled tube. The infill may be
SEAM parallel near planar, curved or CAST uncemented or weakly cemented
undulating boundaries containing soil or have rock properties.
closely spaced, smooth or
slickensided, curved intersecting
fissures which divide the mass into
lenticular or wedge-shaped blocks.
SHEARED A near planar curved or INFILLED Sheet or wall like body of soil
SURFACE undulating, smooth, polished or SEAM substance or mass with roughly
slickensided surface in clayey planar to irregular near parallel
soil. The polished or slickensided
boundaries which cuts through a
surface indicates that movement
(in many cases very little) has soil mass. Formed by infilling of
occurred along the defect. open defects.
Appendix B
Certificate Forms
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON – ASSESSABLE
Section 321
ITEM
To: Mr Mark James Owner /Agent
14 Dension Grove Address
Suburb/postcode
Form 55
West Launceston TAS 7250
Qualified person details:
Qualified person: Tony Barriera - Geoton Pty. Ltd.
Address: PO Box 522 Phone No: 03 6326 5001
Prospect Tas 7250 Fax No:
Licence No: CC6220 P Email address: tbarriera@geoton.com.au
Tony Barriera – BEng, MSc (description from Column 3 of the Director's

Determination - Certificates by Qualified Persons
CPEng, NER – IEAust 471929 for Assessable Items
Qualifications and
Insurance details: Civil, Geotechnical
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's-
N17000416
Speciality area of (description from Column 4 of the Director's
expertise: Geotechnical Engineering Determination - Certificates by Qualified Persons
for Assessable Items)
Details of work:
Address: Lot 6, 29 Foreshore Road Lot No: 6
Kelso TAS 7270 Certificate of title No: 23739/6
The assessable (description of the assessable item being
Classification of foundation conditions certified)
item related to
according to AS2870 - 2011 Assessable item includes –
this certificate: - a material;
- a design
- a form of construction
- a document
- testing of a component, building
system or plumbing system
- an inspection, or assessment,
performed
Certificate details:
Certificate type: Foundation Site Classification – (description from Column 1 of Schedule 1 of the
Director's Determination - Certificates by Qualified
AS2870 Persons for Assessable Items n)
This certificate is in relation to the above assessable item, at any stage, as part of - (tick one)
building work, plumbing work or plumbing installation or demolition work:
or
a building, temporary structure or plumbing installation: X
Director of Building Control – Date Approved 1 July 2017 Building Act 2016 - Approved Form No. 55
In issuing this certificate the following matters are relevant –
Documents: Geoton Pty Ltd, Report Reference No. GL19487Ab,
dated 13/11/2019
Relevant Refer to report

calculations:
References: AS 2870 – 2011 Residential Slabs and Footings Construction

AS 4055 – 2012 Wind Loads for Housing
CSIRO Building Technical File 18
Substance of Certificate: (what it is that is being certified)
Site Classification in accordance to AS2870 - 2011

Wind Loading in accordance to AS 4055 - 2012
Findings and recommendations of report
Scope and/or Limitations
The classification applies to the site as investigated at the time and does not account for
any future alteration to foundation conditions resulting from earthworks, drainage
condition changes or site maintenance variations.
I certify the matters described in this certificate.
Signed: Certificate No: Date:
Qualified person: GL19487Ab 13/11/2019
Director of Building Control – Date Approved 1 July 2017 Building Act 2016 - Approved Form No. 55
Advanced Enviro-septic Design Calculator V8.6 ©
"Always the BEST Option" until site and soil conditions rule it out.
Site
29 (Lot 6) Foreshore Road, Kelso State TAS Post Code 7270
Address
Client
Mr Mark James Date of Site Visit 24/10/19
Name
Designer Lic
Designers Designers Ph
Geoton Pty Ltd (03) 6326 5001 Number
Name Number
Lic (eg.QBCC)
Plumber Ph Plumb / Drainer
Plumber
Number Lic Number
Name
Council Designers AES
West Tamar Council Date 25/10/19
Area Cert Number
This Calculator is a guide only, receiving soil classification, surface water, water tables and all other site constraints addressed by the qualified designer.
System Designers site and soil calculation data entry IMPORTANT NOTES
litre/meter loading rate, "30" for Advanced Secondary or "38" Secondary 38 >> This design is for a SECONDARY system.
Is this a new installation Y or N Y >> Minimun single vent size is 80mm or 2 x 50mm house vents
Number of person 5 a septic tank outlet filter is NOT RECOMMENDED
Daily Design Flow Allowance Litre/Person/Day 120
Number of rows required to suit site constrants 2 >> The maximum lth of a single AES pipe run is 30 meters
on surface Soil Category as established by site and soil evaluation. CATEGORY 1
Design Loading Rate based on site & soil evaluation DLR (mm/day) 50
Bore log depth below system Basel area 1900 >> Min depth below basel area is 600 mm to establish water table or res
Enter System footprint Slope in % for standard AES systems to calculate 3 >> Consideration required for Sloping sites. Ref AS1547. refer commen
Is this design a gravity system with no outlet filter? Y or N N >> A HIGH and LOW vent are required on this
AES system as well as a velocity diffuser
COMMENTS :- " The outcome must be important to everyone. "
- Designers need to be familar with special requirements of Local Authorities. IE - Minimun falls from Septic tank outlets to Land application areas. etc
- Plumbers are reminded to practice good construction techniques as per AS 1547 and as provided on AES installation instructions supplied with components.
AES System Calculator Outcomes AES dimensions
Total System load - litres / day (Q). 600 l/d AES System System Extension
Min Length of AES pipe rows to treat loading 7.9 lm Lth m : (L) 9.6 9.6
Number of FULL AES Pipe lengths per row 3 lths Width m:(W) 1.35 0.00
Sand
Total Capacity of AES System pipe in Litres 1272 ltr. 0.75 FALSE
Depth :
AES Additional infiltration extension required 0.0 m2 Area m2 13.0 0.0
DO YOU WISH TO USE CUT LENGTHS OF PIPE IN THIS DESIGN? (E y
IF YOU WISH TO USE A TRENCH EXTENSION DESIGN OPTION ENTER "Y" Enter Custom Width in me 0
AES INFILTRATION FOOT PRINT AREA - L = Q / ( DLR x W) Length Width Minimum AES foot print required .
for this Basic Serial design is 9.6 x 1.35 = 13.0 m2 total
Code AES System Bill of Materials. Chankar Environmental Use Only
AES-PIPE AES 3 mtr Lths required 6 lths

Digitally signed by
AESC AESC Couplings required 4 ea Steve Dennis
DN: cn=Steve
AESO AESO Offset adaptors 4 ea
Dennis, o=Chandar
AESODV AES Oxgen demand vent 2 ea Enviromental,
AES-IPB AES 100mm Inspection point base 2 ea ou=Resign Review,
“Nature's Wastewater Solutions” email=designrevie
AES Equ AES Speed Flow Equaliser ea
w@enviro-
AES DESO Double Offset Adaptors ea septic.com.au,
c=AU
TOTAL SYSTEM SAND REQUIRED (Guide Only) 12 m3
Date: 2019.11.13
PLEASE email your AES CALC and Drawings to 14:03:19 +10'00'
DESIGNREVIEW@ENVIRO-SEPTIC.COM.AU Designreview@enviro-septic.com.au
> The AES Calculator is a design aid to allow checking of the AES components and configuration and is a guide only. Site and soil
conditions referencing the AS 1547 standard are calculated and designed by a Quailified Designer.
> Chankar Environmental has no responsibility for the soil evaluation, loading calculations or DLR entered by the designer for this calculator.
> AES pipes can be cut to lenght on site. They are supplied in 3 meter lths only.
AES-Design-V8.6-Calculator © Copy Right - Chankar Environmental pty ltd 14/3/2016

LOADING CERTIFICATE
To: Mr Mark James Owner /Agent Certificate Ref:

AS/NZS 1547:2012
Section 7.4.2
West Launceston TAS 7250 Suburb/postcode
Details of work:
Address: Lot 6, 29 Foreshore Road Lot No: 6
Kelso Tas 7270 Certificate of title No: 23739/6
The work On-site domestic-wastewater (description of the work or part work being
certified )
related to this management
certificate:
Certificate details:
In issuing this certificate the following matters are relevant –
Documents: Report GL19487Ab dated 13/11/2019
Figure 2 – Coastal Projected Sea Level Rise
Figure 3 – Coastal Erosion Components
Figure 4 – Coastal Erosion Hazard Bands
Figure 5 – Coastal Inundation Hazard Bands
Figure 6 – AES Section
Figure 7 – Cross Section
Relevant Contained in the above

calculations:
References: AS/NZS1547:2012 On-site domestic-wastewater management
Substance of Certificate:
This certificate sets out the design criteria and the limitations associated with use of the
system.
Wastewater Characteristics
Population equivalent used for this assessment = 5 (3 bedrooms)
Wastewater volume (L/day) used for this assessment = 600 (120 Litres per person)
Approximate blackwater volume (L/day) = 240
Approximate greywater volume (L/day) = 360
Soil Characteristics/Design Criteria

Soil category (Table E1 from AS/NZS 1547) =1
Soil structure (Table E4 from AS/NZS 1547) = Massive
Indicative permeability (Table 5.1 from AS/NZS 1547) = >3.0m/day
Adopted permeability = >6.0m/day
Adopted Design Loading Rate = 50mm/day
Soil thickness for disposal = 1.9m
Minimum depth (m) to water = >1.9m
Dimensions for On-Site Treatment System

Disposal and treatment methods = Advanced Enviro-Septic (AES) system
Site modification and specific design = Not required
Primary disposal area required = 13m2
Reserve disposal area required = 13m2
Location and use of Reserve area = Reserve area located to the southwest of the
proposed disposal area. Currently vacant with garden beds.
Is there sufficient area available on site for disposal (including reserve) = Yes
Notes
The purpose of the reserve area is to allow for future extension of the land application system to allow a
factor of safety against unforseen malfunction or failure, perhaps following increased household
occupancy or inadvertent misuse of the system.
The land application area may be reduced to account for flow reductions by water-saving devices,
provided the organic loading rate is not higher than it would have been without the flow reduction.
Allowable Variation from Design Flow

Based on a septic tank capacity of 3000L, wastewater design flow rate of 600L/day and
the total AES pipe capacity of 1272L the allowable variation from design flow (peak
loading events) would be an additional 672L/day.
System Limitations
Consequences of overloading the system:
Overloading the system can result in failure of the septic tank and land application
system. This is a serious health and environmental hazard and can lead to any one or
more of the following:
• Spread of infectious disease;
• Breeding of mosquitoes and attraction of flies and rodents;
• Nuisance and unpleasantness;
• Pollution of waterways;
• Contamination of bores, wells and groundwater; and
• alteration to local ecology.
Consequences of under loading the system:

Under loading the system may result in the bacteria to stop working and system failure.
Operation Requirements
Refer to Section T5.2.1 of AS/NZS 1547:2012 for additional requirements.
For on-site system to work well the following is required:
• Reduce sludge building up through scraping all dishes to remove fats/grease;
don’t use a food waste disposal unit; and don’t put sanitary napkins into the
system.
• To keep bacteria working in the septic tank use biodegradable soaps; use a low
phosphorous detergent; don’t use powerful bleaches and disinfectants; and don’t
put chemicals or paint down the drain.
• Conservation of water will reduce the volume of effluent requiring disposal to the
land application area, make it last longer and improve its performance.
Maintenance Requirements
Refer to Section T5.2.2 of AS/NZS 1547:2012 for additional requirements.
Maintenance of the system should include the following:
• Septic tanks must be inspected at least annually and pumped out regularly once
the scum and sludge occupy two thirds of the tank volume. Typically a septic
tank must be pumped out at least every 3 to 5 years or more frequently
depending on usage.
• Grease traps must be inspected at least quarterly and cleaned out regularly.
• Deep rooting trees or shrubs should not be grown over trenches or pipes.
• Surface water diversion drains should be maintained upslope of and around the
land application area and kept clean to reduce seepage of rainwater into the
trenches.
• Maintain disposal area by maintaining plants and mowing grass to ensure that
plants/grasses take up nutrients with maximum efficiency.
Check disposal area for blockages such as wet spots and uneven grass colour.
I certify the matters described in this certificate.
Signed: Date: Certificate No.

Certifier:
13/11/2019 GL19487Ab
Section 94
Section 106
CERTIFICATE OF THE RESPONSIBLE DESIGNER Section 129
Section 155
To: Mr Mark James Owner name
Suburb/postcode
Form 35
West Launceston TAS 7250
Designer details:
Name: Category: Civil Engineer
Tony Barriera Hydraulic - Domestic
Business name: Geoton Pty Ltd Phone No: 03 6326 5001
Business
address:
P O Box 522
Prospect TAS 7250 Fax No:
IEAust 471929,
Licence No:
CC6220 P
Email address: tbarriera@geoton.com.au
Details of the proposed work:

Designer’s project
Owner/Applicant Mr Mark James reference No. GL19487Ab
Address: Lot 6, 29 Foreshore Road Lot No: 23739/6
Kelso TAS 7270
Type of work: Building work Plumbing work X (X all applicable)
Description of work:
New building (new building / alteration /
addition / repair / removal /
on-site wastewater management system re-erection
water / sewerage /
stormwater /
on-site wastewater
management system /
backflow prevention / other)
Description of the Design Work (Scope, limitations or exclusions): (X all applicable certificates)
Certificate Type: Certificate Responsible Practitioner
 Building design Architect or Building Designer
 Structural design Engineer or Civil Designer
 Fire Safety design Fire Engineer
 Civil design Civil Engineer or Civil Designer
 Hydraulic design Building Services Designer
 Fire service design Building Services Designer
 Electrical design Building Services Designer
 Mechanical design Building Service Designer
Plumber-Certifier; Architect, Building
 Plumbing design Designer or Engineer
 Other (specify)
Deemed-to-Satisfy:  Performance Solution:  (X the appropriate box)
Other details:
All design documents provided in Report GL19487Ab, dated 13/11/2019
Director of Building Control - date approved: 2 August 2017 Building Act 2016 - Approved Form No 35
Design documents provided:
The following documents are provided with this Certificate –
Document description:
Drawing numbers: Prepared by: Date:
Schedules: Prepared by: Date:
Specifications: Prepared by: Date:
Computations: Prepared by: Date:
Performance solution proposals: Prepared by: Date:
Test reports: Prepared by: Date:
Standards, codes or guidelines relied on in design

process:
All design documents are contained within report
AS/NZS1547:2012 On-site domestic-wastewater management
Any other relevant documentation:
Attribution as designer:
I Tony Barriera of Geoton Pty Ltd am responsible for the design of that part of the work as described in this
certificate;
The documentation relating to the design includes sufficient information for the assessment of the work in
accordance with the Building Act 2016 and sufficient detail for the builder or plumber to carry out the work in
accordance with the documents and the Act;
This certificate confirms compliance and is evidence of suitability of this design with the requirements of the
National Construction Code.
Name: (print) Signed Date
Designer: Tony Barriera 13/11/2019
Licence No: CC6220P
`
Assessment of Certifiable Works: (TasWater)
Note: single residential dwellings and outbuildings on a lot with an existing sewer connection are
not considered to increase demand and are not certifiable.
If you cannot check ALL of these boxes, LEAVE THIS SECTION BLANK.
TasWater must then be contacted to determine if the proposed works are Certifiable Works.
I confirm that the proposed works are not Certifiable Works, in accordance with the Guidelines for
TasWater CCW Assessments, by virtue that all of the following are satisfied:
The works will not increase the demand for water supplied by TasWater
The works will not increase or decrease the amount of sewage or toxins that is to be removed by,
or discharged into, TasWater’s sewerage infrastructure
The works will not require a new connection, or a modification to an existing connection, to be
made to TasWater’s infrastructure
The works will not damage or interfere with TasWater’s works
The works will not adversely affect TasWater’s operations
The work are not within 2m of TasWater’s infrastructure and are outside any TasWater easement
I have checked the LISTMap to confirm the location of TasWater infrastructure
If the property is connected to TasWater’s water system, a water meter is in place, or has been
applied for to TasWater.
Certification:
I Tony Barriera of Geoton Pty Ltd being responsible for the proposed work, am satisfied that the works
described above are not Certifiable Works, as defined within the Water and Sewerage Industry Act 2008,
that I have answered the above questions with all due diligence and have read and understood the
Guidelines for TasWater CCW Assessments.
Note: the Guidelines for TasWater Certification of Certifiable Works Assessments are available
at: www.taswater.com.au
Name: (print) Signed Date
Designer: Tony Barriera 13/11/2019
BMS
19/01/2021
Geoton Pty Ltd ABN 81 129 764 629
PO Box 522 Prospect TAS 7250
Unit 24, 16-18 Goodman Court
Invermay TAS 7248
Tel (+61) (3) 6326 5001
www.geoton.com.au
14 January 2021
Reference No. GL19487Bc
Mr Mark James
14 Denison Grove
WEST LAUNCESTON TAS 7250
Dear Sir
RE: Stormwater Disposal Assessment and Design

29B Foreshore Road, Kelso
We have pleasure in submitting herein our report detailing the results of the
geotechnical investigation conducted at the above site.
Should you require clarification of any aspect of this report, please contact Anne Foster
or the undersigned on 03 6326 5001.
For and on behalf of

Geoton Pty Ltd
Tony Barriera
Director – Principal Geotechnical Engineer
Stormwater Disposal Assessment and Design
1 INTRODUCTION
A limited scope investigation has been conducted for Mr Mark James at the site of a
proposed residential development at 29B Foreshore Road, Kelso.
The investigation has been conducted to assess the suitability of the site for disposal of
stormwater and the design of an on-site stormwater disposal system in accordance
with AS/NZS 3500.3 “Stormwater Drainage”.
Geoton has previously carried out a coastal erosion hazard assessment, site
classification and on-site wastewater disposal assessment and design for the site, our
Report Reference No. GL19487Ab, dated 13 November 2019. As part of that
commission, a preliminary site plan of the proposed development was provided
showing the location of the proposed dwelling, prepared by S Group, dated 27
September 2019.
2 FIELD INVESTIGATION
The field investigation was conducted on 12 January 2021 and involved the drilling of
2 boreholes by 4WD mounted auger rig to the auger refusal or investigated depths of
1.4m and 2.0m.
The permeability of the site was tested using a constant head permeameter.
The logs of the boreholes are included in Appendix A and their locations are shown in
Figure 1 attached.
3 SITE CONDITIONS
The site is located to the southwest of the Tamar River and is currently vacant. The
ground surface within the rear south-western portion of the site generally has a gentle
fall towards the northeast, becoming near level within the front north-eastern portion of
the site to the river. The site is vegetated with a low cover of grass with a small tree
and shrubs within the rear portion of the site (Plate 1).
The MRT Digital Geological Atlas 1:25,000 Series, indicates that the site is located on
Cretaceous aged sediments comprising dominantly non-marine sequences of gravel,
sand, silt, clay and regolith. Our investigation indicated that Quaternary aged beach
sands overlie the Cretaceous aged sediments.
Examination of the LIST Landslide Planning Map indicates that the site is not mapped
within a known landslide hazard band.
The investigation indicated that the soil profile is relatively uniform across the site. The
boreholes encountered silty sand topsoil to depths of 0.2m, overlying sand/silty sand to
depths of 0.9m to 1.2m, underlain by medium plasticity sandy clay to the auger refusal
or investigated depths of 1.4m to 2.0m. Auger refusal in Borehole BH2 was inferred to
be on highly weathered rock.
The boreholes did not encounter any signs of groundwater seepage over the
investigated depths.
Geoton Pty Ltd 1

GL19487Bc
14 January 2021
Full details of soil conditions encountered are presented on the borehole logs.
4 ON-SITE STORMWATER DETENTION DESIGN

4.1 Permeability of Soil and Soil Category
The soil has been classified as follows:
• Texture - Sand (Table E1 from AS1547-2012);
• Structure - Massive (Table E4 from AS/NZS1547-2012); and
• Category - 1 (Table E1 from AS/NZS1547:2012).
For Category 1 soils the indicative permeability from AS/NZS 1547 Table 5.1 is
>3.0m/day.
• Measured Permeability – >6.0m/day; and
• Adopted Permeability – 6.0m/day.
4.2 General
On-site detention storage must be provided to limit the peak rate of piped stormwater
discharge and overland flows from the site to that generated by a 5% Annual
Exceedance Probabilities (AEP) storm event.
4.3 Rainfall and Runoff

The Intensity-Frequency-Design (IFD) rainfall curve and table for the site was
generated from the Bureau of Meteorology IFD data website (BOM 2016).
In accordance with AS/NZS 3500.3 – Stormwater Drainage, Section 3.3.5, the design
rainfall depth/intensity for anywhere in Australia shall be for a five-minute duration.
The five-minute duration design rainfall depth for the design AEP event is as follows:
• 5% AEP = 8.90mm
The storage quantity is calculated using the following formula:
𝑸 = 𝑪𝑫𝑨
where Q is quantity in m3;
C is coefficient of runoff (taken as unity 1.0);
D is depth of the Storm in m; and
A is area of the catchment (roof area) that rainfall will runoff in m2.
The proposed dwelling has a roof area totalling approximately 193m2 (inclusive of a
10% safety factor). Therefore, the stormwater quantity and flowrate for a design event
are calculated as follows:
The stormwater quantity:
Q5= 1.0 x 8.90 / 1000 x 116 = 1.72m3.
Geoton Pty Ltd 2

GL19487Bc
14 January 2021
The event flowrate (q5) is calculated by dividing storage quantity by the storm duration
of 5 minutes, i.e. 300 seconds, and thus
q5 = 1.72 / 300 = 0.0057m3/s = 5.7L/s
4.4 Detention Method

Suitable on-site detention will be provided through a gravel-filled detention bed with the
capacity to hold a 5% AEP event before overflowing via sheet flow across the property.
The stormwater quantity for a 5% AEP event from the roof area is calculated as
1.72m3. Therefore, the detention bed will require a volume of approximately 6.88m3 to
store a 5% AEP event taking into consideration a porosity of 0.25 for the 20mm to
40mm nominal size gravel. The required stormwater detention bed dimensions are as
follows:
• Bed length = 6.9m
• Bed width = 1.0m
• Bed depth = 1.0m
The trench is to be constructed as per the cross section provided on Figure 2 attached.
These dimensions may be modified to fit the site conditions provided the total storage
volume is maintained.
References:
AS 1726 - 2017 Geotechnical Site Investigations
IFD Data System: http://www.bom.gov.au/water/designRainfalls/ifd/
AS/NZS 3500.3 – Stormwater Drainage
Attachments:
Limitations of report
Figure 2 – Stormwater Detention Bed Cross Section
Appendix A: Borehole Logs & Explanation Sheets
Geoton Pty Ltd 3

GL19487Bc
14 January 2021
Geotechnical Consultants - Limitations of report
These notes have been prepared to assist in the interpretation and understanding of the limitations of
this report.
Project specific criteria Report Recommendations
The report has been developed on the basis of The report is based on the assumption that the
unique project specific requirements as site conditions as revealed through selective point
understood by Geoton and applies only to the site sampling are indicative of actual conditions
investigated. Project criteria are typically throughout an area. This assumption cannot be
identified in the Client brief and the associated substantiated until earthworks and/or foundation
proposal prepared by Geoton and may include construction is almost complete and therefore the
risk factors arising from limitations on scope report recommendations can only be regarded as
imposed by the Client. The report should not be preliminary. Where variations in conditions are
used without further consultation if significant encountered, further advice should be sought.
changes to the project occur. No responsibility for
Specific purposes
problems that might occur due to changed factors
will be accepted without consultation.
This report should not be applied to any project
other than that originally specified at the time the
Subsurface variations with time
report was issued.
Because a report is based on conditions which Interpretation by others

existed at the time of subsurface exploration,
decisions should not be based on a report whose Geoton will not be responsible for interpretations
adequacy may have been affected by time. For of site data or the report findings by others
example, water levels can vary with time, fill may involved in the design and construction process.
be placed on a site and pollutants may migrate Where any confusion exists, clarification should
with time. In the event of significant delays in the be sought from Geoton.
commencement of a project, further advice
Report integrity
should be sought.
Interpretation of factual data The report as a whole presents the findings of the
site assessment and the report should not be
Site assessment identifies actual subsurface copied in part or altered in any way.
conditions only at those points where samples
Geoenvironmental issues
are taken and at the time they are taken. All
available data is interpreted by professionals to
This report does not cover issues of site
provide an opinion about overall site conditions,
contamination unless specifically required to do
their likely impact on the proposed development
so by the client. In the absence of such a
and recommended actions. Actual conditions may
request, Geoton take no responsibility for such
differ from those inferred to exist, as it is virtually
issues.
impossible to provide a definitive subsurface
profile which includes all the possible variabilities
inherent in soil and rock masses.
Geoton Pty Ltd

TAMAR RIVER N
1.0
Rocks m
FO
RE Cement
SH Wall
OR
E
RO
AD
2.0m
STORMWATER DISCHARGE 2.0m
TRENCH SEE FIGURE 2
BH 1
PROPOSED
DRIVEWAY
NEAR
BH 2 LEVEL
AES SEE REPORT

GL19487A PROPOSED
DWELLING
1O-2O
3000L SEPTIC TANK

PUMP PIT AND PUMP
RESERVE AREA
3.0
m
Legend Approximate Scale (m)

0 5 10 15 20
BH 1
Approximate Borehole Location
5O
Approximate Slope Angle client: MR MARK JAMES
project:
29B FORESHORE ROAD
KELSO
Approximate Change in Slope date 14/01/2021 drawn AF
scale title: SITE PLAN

size
A3 rev GL19487B 1
project:
29B FORESHORE ROAD
KELSO
scale title: STORMWATER DISCHARGE TRENCH SECTION

1:20 approved TB
A4 rev GL19487B 2
size
Appendix A
Borehole Logs
ENGINEERING
BOREHOLE LOG
Unit 24, 16-18 Goodman Court, Invermay TAS Job no. GL19487B
Tel (03) 6326 5001
Project : On-site Stormwater Disposal Evaluation and Design Logged By : AF/WC
Location : 29B Foreshore Road, Kelso
Moisture condition
Penetration
Graphic log
Classification
Support
Method
Notes Symbol
Water
index
(m) observations
Tests
TOPSOIL - Silty SAND - fine grained, D L

grey, root fibres
0.25 SP SAND - medium grained, light brown, D MD

with shells and shell fragments
0.50
ADV
N
0.75
1.00
Becoming grey/brown
1.25 CL Sandy CLAY - medium plasticity, MD

brown, medium to coarse grained
sand, trace fine to medium
subangular gravel
1.50
1.75 Decreasing sand content D
2.00
Borehole BH1 terminated @ 2.0m
2.25
ENGINEERING
BOREHOLE LOG
Unit 24, 16-18 Goodman Court, Invermay TAS Job no. GL19487B
Tel (03) 6326 5001
Project : On-site Stormwater Disposal Evaluation and Design Logged By : AF/WC
Location : 29B Foreshore Road, Kelso
Moisture condition
Penetration
Graphic log
Classification
Support
Method
Notes Symbol
Water
index
(m) observations
Tests
TOPSOIL - Silty SAND - fine grained, M L

grey, root fibres
0.25 SM Silty SAND - fine grained, M MD

dark/grey
0.50
ADV
N
0.75
CI Silty CLAY - medium plasticity, dark M St

1.00 brown, fine to coarse grained sand
and shell fragments, with fine to
medium subangular gravel
Becoming brown, with cobbles

1.25

1.50 inferred highly weathered rock
1.75
2.00
2.25
Investigation Log Explanation Sheet
METHOD – BOREHOLE NOTES, SAMPLES, TESTS
TERM Description TERM Description
AS Auger Screwing* U50 Undisturbed sample 50 mm diameter
AD Auger Drilling* U63 Undisturbed sample 63 mm diameter
RR Roller / Tricone D Disturbed sample
W Washbore N Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
CT Cable Tool N* SPT – sample recovered
HA Hand Auger NC SPT with solid cone
DT Diatube V Vane Shear
B Blank Bit PP Pocket Penetrometer
V V Bit P Pressumeter
T TC Bit BS Bulk sample
* Bit shown by suffix e.g. ADT
E Environmental Sample
METHOD – EXCAVATION R Refusal
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer
TERM Description DCP
(blows/100mm)
N Natural exposure PL Plastic Limit
LL Liquid Limit
X Existing excavation
LS Linear Shrinkage
H Backhoe bucket
B Bulldozer blade CLASSIFICATION SYMBOLS AND SOIL

DESCRIPTION
R Ripper
Based on AS 1726:2017
E Excavator
MOISTURE
SUPPORT
TERM Description
TERM Description
D Dry
M Mud
M Moist
N Nil
W Wet
C Casing
S Shoring CONSISTENCY/DENSITY INDEX

TERM Description
PENETRATION
VS very soft
1 2 3 4
S soft
No resistance
ranging to F firm
Refusal
St stiff
WATER
VSt very stiff
Symbol Description
H hard
Water inflow Fr friable
Water outflow VL very loose
L loose
17/3/08 water on date shown
MD medium dense
D dense
VD Very dense
Soil Description Explanation Sheet (1of 2)
DEFINITION RELATIVE DENSITY OF NON-COHESIVE SOILS
In engineering terms, soil includes every type of uncemented or TERM DENSITY INDEX (%)
partially cemented inorganic or organic material found in the
Very Loose ≤15
ground. In practice, if the material can be remoulded or
Loose 15 to 35
disintegrated by hand in its field condition or in water it is
Medium Dense 35 to 65
described as a soil. Other materials are described using rock
Dense 65 to 85
description terms.
Very Dense > 85
CLASSIFICATION SYMBOL AND SOIL NAME
DESCRIPTIVE TERMS FOR ACCESSORY SOIL
Soils are described in accordance with the AS 1726: 2017 as COMPONENTS
shown in the table on Sheet 2.
IN COARSE IN FINE
DESIGNATION
COMPONENT
PARTICLE SIZE DEFINITIONS GRAINED GRAINED
SOILS SOILS
OF
NAME SUBDIVISION SIZE (mm) TERM
BOULDERS >200 % Accessory
% Sand/
COBBLES 63 to 200 % Fines coarse
gravel
fraction
Coarse 19 to 63
GRAVEL Medium 6.7 to 19 ≤5 ≤15 ≤15 Trace
Minor
Fine 2.36 to 6.7 >5, ≤12 >15, ≤30 >15, ≤30 With
Coarse 0.6 to 2.36 Secondary >12 >30 >30 Prefix
SAND Medium 0.21 to 0.6
Fine 0.075 to 0.21 SOIL STRUCTURE
SILT 0.002 to 0.075 ZONING CEMENTING
CLAY <0.002 Layer Continuous across Weakly Easily
the exposure or cemented disaggregated
MOISTURE CONDITION sample. by hand in air
Coarse Grained Soils or water.
Lens Discontinuous layer
Dry Non-cohesive and free running. of different material,
Moist Soil feels cool, darkened in colour. with lenticular shape. Moderately Effort is
Soil tends to stick together. cemented required to
Wet As for moist but with free water forming when Pocket An irregular inclusion disaggregate
handling. of different material. the soil by
hand in air or
Fine Grained Soils
water.
Moist, dry of Plastic Limited – w < PL
Hard and friable or powdery. GEOLOGICAL ORIGIN
Moist, near Plastic Limit – w ≈ PL
Soils can be moulded at a moisture content WEATHERED IN PLACE SOILS
approximately equal to the plastic limit.
Extremely Structure and/or fabric of parent rock
Moist, wet of Plastic Limit – w > PL
weathered material retained and visible.
Soils usually weakened and free water forms on
material
hands when handling.
Wet, near Liquid Limit - w ≈ LL Residual soil Structure and/or fabric of parent rock
Wet, wet of Liquid Limit - w > LL material not retained and visible.
CONSISTENCY TERMS FOR COHESIVE SOILS TRANSPORTED SOILS
UNDRAINED Aeolian soil Carried and deposited by wind.

TERM STRENGTH FIELD GUIDE Alluvial soil Deposited by streams and rivers.
su (kPa)
Colluvial soil Soil and rock debris transported downslope
Exudes between the fingers when
Very Soft ≤12 by gravity.
squeezed in hand
Can be moulded by light finger Estuarine soil Deposited in coastal estuaries, and
Soft 12 to 25 including sediments carried by inflowing
pressure
rivers and streams, and tidal currents.
Can be moulded by strong finger
Firm 25 to 50
pressure Fill Man-made deposit. Fill may be significantly
Stiff 50 to 100 Cannot be moulded by fingers more variable between tested locations
Very Stiff 100 to 200 Can be indented by thumb nail than naturally occurring soils.
Can be indented with difficulty by Lacustrine soil Deposited in freshwater lakes.
Hard >200
thumb nail
Marine soil Deposited in a marine environment.
Can be easily crumbled or broken
Friable –
into small pieces by hand
Soil Description Explanation Sheet (2 of 2)
SOIL CLASSIFICATION INCLUDING IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
FIELD IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES GROUP
PRIMARY NAME
(Excluding particles larger than 63 mm and basing fractions on estimated mass) SYMBOL
GW GRAVEL
GRAVEL
no fines)
(Little or
CLEAN
amounts of all intermediate particle sizes
larger than 2.36 mm

coarse fraction is
More than half of Predominantly one size or a range of sizes
GP GRAVEL
GRAVEL

fraction is larger than 0.075 mm
WITH FINES
(Appreciable
(A 0.075 mm particle is about the smallest particle visible to naked eyes)
COARSE GRAINED SOIL
GM Silty GRAVEL
GRAVEL
of fines)
amount

GC Clayey GRAVEL

no fines) SW SAND
(Little or
CLEAN
SAND
amounts of all intermediate sizes

smaller than 2.36 mm
coarse fraction is
More than half of
Predominantly one size or a range of sizes

SP SAND
SAND

WITH FINES
(Appreciable

SM Silty SAND
of fines)
amount
SAND

SC Clayey SAND
IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES ON FRACTIONS <0.075 mm

fraction is smaller than 0.075 mm
DRY STRENGTH DILATANCY TOUGHNESS

SILT & CLAY
None to Low Slow to Rapid Low ML SILT

plasticity,
FINE GRAINED SOIL
LL ≤ 50)
medium
(low to
Medium to High None to Slow Medium CL, CI CLAY
Low to Medium Slow Low OL ORGANIC SILT

SILT & CLAY
Low to Medium None to Slow Low to Medium MH SILT

plasticity,
LL > 50)
(high
High to Very High None High CH CLAY
Medium to High None to Very Slow Low to Medium OH ORGANIC CLAY
Highly Organic Readily identified by colour, odour, spongy feel and frequently by
Pt PEAT
Soil fibrous texture.
● LL – Liquid Limit.
COMMON DEFECTS IN SOILS

TERM DEFINITION DIAGRAM TERM DEFINITION DIAGRAM
PARTING A surface or crack across which the SOFTENED A zone in clayey soil, usually
soil has little or no tensile strength. ZONE adjacent to a defect in which the
Parallel or sub parallel to layering soil has a higher moisture content
than elsewhere.
(e.g. bedding). May be open or
closed.
FISSURE A surface or crack across which the TUBE Tubular cavity. May occur singly or
soil has little or no tensile strength, as one of a large number of
but which is not parallel or sub separate or inter-connected tubes.
parallel to layering. May be open or Walls often coated with clay or
closed. May include desiccation strengthened by denser packing of
cracks. grains. May contain organic matter.
SHEARED Zone in clayey soil with roughly TUBE An infilled tube. The infill may be
SEAM parallel near planar, curved or CAST uncemented or weakly cemented
undulating boundaries containing soil or have rock properties.
closely spaced, smooth or
slickensided, curved intersecting
fissures which divide the mass into
lenticular or wedge-shaped blocks.
SHEARED A near planar curved or INFILLED Sheet or wall like body of soil
SURFACE undulating, smooth, polished or SEAM substance or mass with roughly
slickensided surface in clayey planar to irregular near parallel
soil. The polished or slickensided
boundaries which cuts through a
surface indicates that movement
(in many cases very little) has soil mass. Formed by infilling of
occurred along the defect. open defects.

PA2020473 - Dwelling - 29B Foreshore Road Kelso

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

PA2020473 - Dwelling - 29B Foreshore Road Kelso

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

James

REVISION B DATE 19/01/21 DESCRIPTION Planning Permit

FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ONLY S. Group

29A Foreshore Road

pump pit and pump

469 refer to report

REVISION B DATE 19/01/21 DESCRIPTION Planning Permit

FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ONLY

line of deck over

line of building over

line of deck over

4780 5705 7260 4535 1290

REVISION B DATE 19/01/21 DESCRIPTION Planning Permit

FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ONLY S. Group

INTERNAL TIMBER STUD WALL

1000 90 5200 90 1390 90 1500 90 725

140 3700 90 9450 9960 140 3440

REVISION B DATE 19/01/21 DESCRIPTION Planning Permit

FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ONLY S. Group

glass infil panel to underside of roof system F.

EXTERNAL FINISHES & COLOURS SCHEDULE: ELEVATION KEY

West Elevation Northern Elevation

EXTERNAL FINISHES & COLOURS SCHEDULE: ELEVATION KEY

RE: Coastal Erosion Hazard Assessment, Site Classification & On-site

For and on behalf of Geoton Pty Ltd

1.1 Proposed Development

Geoton Pty Ltd 1

4 COASTAL EROSION ASSESSMENT

Geoton Pty Ltd 2

4.2 Coastal Vulnerability

4.3 Coastal Erosion

Geoton Pty Ltd 3

4.4 Coastal Inundation

4.4.1 Temporary Inundation

Geoton Pty Ltd 4

4.4.2 Permanent Inundation

5 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Geoton Pty Ltd 5

REGION TERRAIN SHIELDING TOPOGRAPHY

Geoton Pty Ltd 6

9.1 Permeability of Soil and Soil Category

9.2 Disposal and Treatment Method

9.3 Design Loading Rate

Geoton Pty Ltd 7

9.4 AES System

9.6 Wastewater Recommendations

Geoton Pty Ltd 8

Geoton Pty Ltd 9

Geoton Pty Ltd 10

Because a report is based on conditions which Interpretation by others

Geoton Pty Ltd

6 x AES PIPES INSPECTION POINT

HIGH VENT Ø 50mm

VELOCITY REDUCER IS REQUIRED

LOW VENT Ø 100mm TREE/STAKE/BUILDING

HIGH VENT DETAIL

MEAN HIGH WATER MARK

AES TO BE SET BACK:

Legend Approximate Scale (m)

scale title: SITE PLAN

Predicted Sea Level Rise 2100 Approximate Scale (m)

scale title: COASTAL PROJECTED SEA LEVEL RISE

Low Hazard Zone -

scale title: COASTAL EROSION COMPONENT