Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FINAL REPORT
SUPPORTING REPORT (2)
JULY 2023
ANNEX D Hydrology
Databook - Hydrology
List of Data Collection
ANNEX D
Hydrology
Data Collection Survey for National Water Resources Development and Management Plan Final Report
Annex-D-Hydrology
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1 Meteorology and Hydrology ...................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Meteorology and Hydrology ................................................................................................................... 1
1.1.1 Collection of Basic Data for Hydrological Analysis ...................................................................... 1
1.1.2 Rainfall Data .................................................................................................................................. 2
1.1.3 Streamflow Data ............................................................................................................................ 5
1.1.4 Climatological Data ....................................................................................................................... 7
1.1.5 Climate and Climate Regions of the Study Area ............................................................................ 9
1.2 River and Water Resources ................................................................................................................... 12
1.2.1 Hydrological Situation ................................................................................................................. 12
1.2.2 River Systems and Major River Basins........................................................................................ 14
1.2.3 Water Resources Regions and Administrative Regions ............................................................... 15
1.2.4 Surface Water Resources Development ....................................................................................... 17
CHAPTER 2 Hydrological Analysis.............................................................................................................. 25
2.1 Outline and Work Flow of Hydrological Analysis ................................................................................ 25
2.2 Hydrological Analysis (Surface Water) ................................................................................................. 26
2.2.1 Selection of Re-analysis and Satellite Rainfall Data .................................................................... 26
2.3 Evaluation of ERA5, GSMaP and CHIRPS .......................................................................................... 27
2.3.1 Data Availability .......................................................................................................................... 27
2.3.2 Data Quality ................................................................................................................................. 27
2.3.3 National Level Hydrological Analysis (Surface Water) ............................................................... 33
2.3.4 Verification of Observed River Discharge Data ........................................................................... 40
2.3.5 Modeled Sub-Basins .................................................................................................................... 42
2.4 Hydrological Analysis (Groundwater) .................................................................................................. 62
2.4.1 Groundwater Model ..................................................................................................................... 62
2.4.2 Verification of Observed Groundwater Level .............................................................................. 67
2.5 Scatter Diagrams of Monthly Rainfall at 13 Stations Owned by PAGASA .......................................... 71
2.1 1/5-Drought Year and the Annual Rainfall by Province ........................................................................ 74
2.2 Availability of Daily Discharge Data .................................................................................................... 76
CHAPTER 3 Dam/Reservoir Operation Model ............................................................................................. 78
3.1 Magat Dam (WRR-II, Cagayan River Basin) ....................................................................................... 78
3.2 San Roque Dam (WRR-III, Agno River Basin ..................................................................................... 81
3.3 Angat Dam (WRR-III, Pampanga River Basin) .................................................................................... 84
3.4 Pantabangan Dam (WRR-III, Pampanga River Basin) ......................................................................... 88
CHAPTER 4 Evaluation of Observed Discharge........................................................................................... 92
4.1 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station .................................................................. 92
CHAPTER 5 Results of Tank Model Calibration ........................................................................................ 102
5.1 Area of Provinces in Water Resources Region .................................................................................... 102
List of Tables
Table D-1 Basic Data Related to Hydrological Analysis ........................................................................... 1
Table D-2 Number of Discharge Observation Stations by WRRs.............................................................. 6
Table D-3 Climatological Data at Manila by FAO-ClimWat ..................................................................... 8
Table D-4 Major Lakes in the Philippines ................................................................................................ 13
Table D-5 Major Fishing Grounds in the Philippines............................................................................... 13
Table D-6 Hydrological Characteristics of Each Water Resource Region ............................................... 16
Table D-7 Total (SW+GW) Irrigation Service Area (km^2) in Wet Season by WRR in 2020 ................ 17
Table D-8 Main Features of Existing Major Dams in Philippines ........................................................... 18
Table D-9 List of Proposed Impounding Dam Projects for Major River Basins ...................................... 21
Table D-10 List of Proposed Water Supply Projects for 9 Urbanized Areas ............................................. 23
Table D-11 Overview of the Three Proposed Rainfall Datasets ................................................................. 27
Table D-12 Quality Evaluation of ERA5, GSMaP and CHIRPS in Comparison to Monthly In-situ Rainfall
Data Provided by PAGASA .................................................................................................... 28
Table D-13 Details of Four Iso-hyetal Maps .............................................................................................. 29
Table D-14 Evaluation of Re-analysis and Satellite Data .......................................................................... 33
Table D-15 Example of Calculation Sheets of Irrigation Water Requirement ........................................... 36
Table D-16 Example of Input Data and Parameters for Groundwater Model ............................................ 65
Table D-17 Physical Properties .................................................................................................................. 66
Table D-18 Groundwater Monitoring Wells by NWRB............................................................................. 68
Table D-19 1/5-Drought Year and the Annual Rainfall by Province (1/2)................................................. 74
Table D-20 1/5-Drought Year and the Annual Rainfall by Province (2/2)................................................. 75
Table D-21 Reservoir Operation Simulation Model for Magat Dam ......................................................... 80
Table D-22 Reservoir Operation Simulation Model for San Roque Dam .................................................. 84
Table D-23 Reservoir Operation Simulation Model for Angat Dam.......................................................... 87
Table D-24 Reservoir Operation Simulation Model for Pantabangan Dam ............................................... 91
Table D-25 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-I, Abra River Basin ...... 92
Table D-26 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-II, Cagayan River Basin92
Table D-27 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-II, Abulog River Basin 93
Table D-28 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-III, Pampanga River Basin
............................................................................................................................................. 93
Table D-29 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-III, Agno River Basin .. 94
Table D-30 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-IV, Pasig-Laguuna_de_Bay
............................................................................................................................................. 94
Table D-31 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-IV, Mindro Island ........ 95
Table D-32 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-IV, Palawan Island....... 96
Table D-33 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-V, Bicol ....................... 96
Table D-34 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-VI................................. 97
Table D-35 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-VII, Cebu ..................... 97
Table D-36 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-VII, Bohol.................... 98
Table D-37 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-VII, Negros .................. 98
Table D-38 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-VIII .............................. 99
Table D-39 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-IX................................. 99
Table D-40 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-X, Agusan .................. 100
Table D-41 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-X, Cagayan de Oro .... 100
Table D-42 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-XI............................... 101
Table D-43 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-XII ............................. 101
Table D-44 Area of Provinces in Water Resources Region ..................................................................... 102
Table D-45 Calibrated Parameters of Groundwater Model ...................................................................... 150
Table D-46 Comparison of Water Balance of Surface Water in 2050 by WRR (Present Weather
Condition) [Irrigation WR=NIMP] ....................................................................................... 155
Table D-47 Comparison of Water Balance of Surface Water in 2050 by WRR (Present Weather
Condition) [Irrigation WR=JST] ........................................................................................... 156
Table D-48 Comparison of Water Balance of Surface Water in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5-Low Condition)
[Irrigation WR=NIMP] ......................................................................................................... 157
Table D-49 Comparison of Water Balance of Surface Water in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5-Low Condition)
[Irrigation WR=JST] ............................................................................................................. 158
Table D-50 Comparison of Water Balance of Surface Water in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5-Median
Condition) [Irrigation WR=NIMP] ....................................................................................... 159
Table D-51 Comparison of Water Balance of Surface Water in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5- Median
Condition) [Irrigation WR=JST] ........................................................................................... 160
Table D-52 Comparison of Water Balance of Surface Water in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5-High Condition)
[Irrigation WR=NIMP] ......................................................................................................... 161
Table D-53 Comparison of Water Balance of Surface Water in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5- High Condition)
[Irrigation WR=JST] ............................................................................................................. 162
Table D-54 Comparison of Water Balance of Groundwater in 2050 by WRR (Present Weather Condition)
[Irrigation WR=NIMP] ......................................................................................................... 163
Table D-55 Comparison of Water Balance of Groundwater in 2050 by WRR (Present Weather Condition)
[Irrigation WR=JST] ............................................................................................................. 164
Table D-56 Comparison of Water Balance of Groundwater in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5-Low Condition)
[Irrigation WR=NIMP] ......................................................................................................... 165
Table D-57 Comparison of Water Balance of Groundwater n 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5-Low Condition)
[Irrigation WR=JST] ............................................................................................................. 166
Table D-58 Comparison of Water Balance of Groundwater in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5-Median Condition)
[Irrigation WR=NIMP] ......................................................................................................... 167
Table D-59 Comparison of Water Balance of Groundwater in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5- Median Condition)
[Irrigation WR=JST] ............................................................................................................. 168
Table D-60 Comparison of Water Balance of Groundwater in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5-High Condition)
Table D-80 Monthly Water Balance and Water Demand Sufficiency Fill-Rate of 1/5-Dry Year in 2050
[Weather=RCP8.5-Median] [IWD=JPT] (7/11) .................................................................... 189
Table D-81 Monthly Water Balance and Water Demand Sufficiency Fill-Rate of 1/5-Dry Year in 2050
[Weather=RCP8.5-Median] [IWD=JPT] (8/11) .................................................................... 190
Table D-82 Monthly Water Balance and Water Demand Sufficiency Fill-Rate of 1/5-Dry Year in 2050
[Weather=RCP8.5-Median] [IWD=JPT] (9/11) .................................................................... 191
Table D-83 Monthly Water Balance and Water Demand Sufficiency Fill-Rate of 1/5-Dry Year in 2050
[Weather=RCP8.5-Median] [IWD=JPT] (10/11) .................................................................. 192
Table D-84 Monthly Water Balance and Water Demand Sufficiency Fill-Rate of 1/5-Dry Year in 2050
[Weather=RCP8.5-Median] [IWD=JPT] (11/11) .................................................................. 193
Table D-85 Summary of Monthly Water Balance and Water Demand Sufficiency Fill-Rate of 1/5-Dry Year
in 2050 [Weather=RCP8.5-Median] [IWD=JPT] ................................................................. 194
Table D-86 Comparison of Major Surface Water Models........................................................................ 196
Table D-87 Comparison of Major Surface Water Models........................................................................ 202
Table D-88 Mualem’s Soil Catalog (Soil Properties) ............................................................................... 203
Table D-89 Summary of Field Survey of River Flow (WRR-V) ............................................................. 208
Table D-90 Summary of Field Survey of River Flow (WRR-VII) ........................................................... 208
Table D-91 Summary of Field Survey of River Flow (WRR-XI) ............................................................ 209
Table D-92 Summary of Soil Parameters by Field Survey....................................................................... 212
Table D-93 Example of Calibrated SHER Model Parameters for Cebu Island ........................................ 213
Table D-94 Number of Discharge Observation Stations by WRRs.......................................................... 288
Table D-95 Annual Runoff Coefficient of Observed Daily Discharge in WRR-VII................................ 290
Table D-96 Cases of Water Balance Calculations .................................................................................... 295
Table D-97 CLIRAM of the Projected Seasonal Change in Annual Total Precipitation (mm/year) in the
Mid-21s Century (2036-2065) for all Provinces (baseline period: 1971-2000) .................... 295
Table D-99 Number of Discharge Observation Stations by WRRs.......................................................... 304
Table D-100 Annual Runoff Coefficient of Observed Daily Discharge in WRR-XI (1/2) ........................ 306
Table D-101 Annual Runoff Coefficient of Observed Daily Discharge in WRR-XI (2/2) ........................ 306
Table D-103 Number of Discharge Observation Stations by WRRs.......................................................... 317
Table D-104 Annual Runoff Coefficient of Observed Daily Discharge in WRR-V (1/2) ......................... 320
Table D-105 Annual Runoff Coefficient of Observed Daily Discharge in WRR-V (2/2) ......................... 321
Table D-106 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Cebu Province in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 365
Table D-107 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Bohol Province in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 366
Table D-108 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Negros Oriental Province in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present
Weather Condition, Water Demand=2050) ........................................................................... 366
Table D-109 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Siquijor Province in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 367
Table D-11.3110 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Cebu Province at Each Climate
Change Condition.................................................................................................................. 367
Table D-111 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Bohol Province at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 368
Table D-112 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Negros Oriental Province at Each Climate
Change Condition.................................................................................................................. 368
Table D-113 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Siquijor Province at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 368
Table D-114 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Metro Cebu in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition,
Water Demand=2050) ........................................................................................................... 370
Table D-115 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Toledo City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition,
Water Demand=2050) ........................................................................................................... 370
Table D-116 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Tagbilaran City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 371
Table D-117 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Panglao City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 371
Table D-118 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Carmen City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 372
Table D-119 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Inabanga City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 372
Table D-120 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Dumaguete City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 373
Table D-121 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Sibulan City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 373
Table D-122 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Siquijor Island in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 374
Table D-123 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Metro Cebu Area at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 374
Table D-124 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Guinabasan River Basin in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present
Weather Condition, Water Demand=2050) ........................................................................... 377
Table D-125 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Balamban River Basin in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 377
Table D-126 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Sapang Dakko River Basin in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present
Weather Condition, Water Demand=2050) ........................................................................... 378
Table D-127 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Mananga River Basin in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 378
Table D-128 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Cebu City Area Small River Basins in 1/5-Dry Year,
(Present Weather Condition, Water Demand=2050) ............................................................. 379
Table D-129 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Kotkot River Basin in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Table D-149 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Agusan del Sur Province in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present
Weather Condition, Water Demand=2050) ........................................................................... 430
Table D-150 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Bukidnon Province in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 431
Table D-151 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Davao de Oro (Compostela Valley) Province in 1/5-Dry
Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water Demand=2050) ................................................... 431
Table D-152 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Davao del Norte Province in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present
Weather Condition, Water Demand=2050) ........................................................................... 432
Table D-153 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Davao del Sur Province in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 432
Table D-154 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Davao Oriental Province in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present
Weather Condition, Water Demand=2050) ........................................................................... 433
Table D-155 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Davao Occidental Province in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present
Weather Condition, Water Demand=2050) ........................................................................... 433
Table D-156 Surface and Groundwater Balance of North Cotabato Province in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present
Weather Condition, Water Demand=2050) ........................................................................... 434
Table D-157 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Sarangani Province in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 434
Table D-158 Surface and Groundwater Balance of South Cotabato Province in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present
Weather Condition, Water Demand=2050) ........................................................................... 435
Table D-159 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Sultan Kudarat Province in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present
Weather Condition, Water Demand=2050) ........................................................................... 435
Table D-160 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Surigao del Sur Province in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present
Weather Condition, Water Demand=2050) ........................................................................... 436
Table D-161 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Agusan del Sur Province at Each Climate
Change Condition.................................................................................................................. 436
Table D-162 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Bukidnon Province at Each Climate
Change Condition.................................................................................................................. 437
Table D-163 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Davao de Oro (Compostela Valley) Province
at Each Climate Change Condition ....................................................................................... 437
Table D-164 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Davao del Norte Province at Each Climate
Change Condition.................................................................................................................. 437
Table D-165 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Davao del Sur Province at Each Climate
Change Condition.................................................................................................................. 438
Table D-166 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Davao Oriental Province at Each Climate
Change Condition.................................................................................................................. 438
Table D-167 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Davao Occidental Province at Each
Climate Change Condition .................................................................................................... 438
Table D-168 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of North Cotabato Province at Each Climate
Table D-188 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Toledo City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition,
Water Demand=2050) ........................................................................................................... 452
Table D-189 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Tagbilaran City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 452
Table D-190 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Panglao City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 453
Table D-191 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Carmen City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 453
Table D-192 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Inabanga City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 454
Table D-193 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Dumaguete City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 454
Table D-194 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Sibulan City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 455
Table D-195 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Siquijor Island in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 455
Table D-196 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Metro Cebu Area at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 456
Table D-197 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Toledo City at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 456
Table D-198 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Tagbilaran City at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 457
Table D-199 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Panglao City at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 457
Table D-200 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Carmen City at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 458
Table D-201 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Inabanga City at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 458
Table D-202 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Dumaguete City at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 459
Table D-203 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Sibulan City at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 459
Table D-204 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Siquijor Island at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 460
Table D-205 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Metro Davao in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 481
Table D-206 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Metro General Santos in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 482
Table D-207 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Cantilan City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Table D-227 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Sipocong River Basin in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 502
Table D-228 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Tanjay River Basin in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 503
Table D-229 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Abatan River Basin in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 503
Table D-230 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Loboc River Basin in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 504
Table D-231 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Inabanga River Basin in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 504
Table D-232 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Guinabasan River Basin at Each Climate
Change Condition.................................................................................................................. 505
Table D-233 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Balamban River Basin at Each Climate
Change Condition.................................................................................................................. 505
Table D-234 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Sapang Dakko River Basin at Each Climate
Change Condition.................................................................................................................. 505
Table D-235 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Mananga River Basin at Each Climate
Change Condition.................................................................................................................. 506
Table D-236 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Cebu City Small River Basins at Each
Climate Change Condition .................................................................................................... 506
Table D-237 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Kotkot River Basin at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 506
Table D-238 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Sipocong River Basin at Each Climate
Change Condition.................................................................................................................. 507
Table D-239 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Tanjay River Basin at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 507
Table D-240 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Abatan River Basin at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 507
Table D-241 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Loboc River Basin at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 508
Table D-242 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Inabanga River Basin at Each Climate
Change Condition.................................................................................................................. 508
Table D-243 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Davao River Basin in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 512
Table D-244 Surface and Groundwater Balance of Tagm River Basin in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather
Condition, Water Demand=2050) ......................................................................................... 512
Table D-245 Surface and Groundwater Balance of General Santos River Basin in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present
Weather Condition, Water Demand=2050) ........................................................................... 513
Table D-246 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Davao River Basin at Each Climate Change
Table D-266 Summary of Annual Water Balance and Deficit of Lanang River Basin at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 524
Table D-267 List o Proposed Dam Sites in WRR-VII ............................................................................... 527
Table D-268 Futures of Proposed Mananga-II Dam in WRR-VII (Cebu) [Case: Sediment Yield=1.58
mm/year, Dam Height=41.5m] ............................................................................................. 532
Table D-269 Futures of Proposed Mananga-II Dam in WRR-VII (Cebu) [Case: Sediment Yield=1.58
mm/year, Dam Height=81.5 m, Design Demand=18.5%] .................................................... 533
Table D-270 Results of Proposed Mananga-II Dam in WRR-VII (Cebu) [Case: Sediment Yield=1.58
mm/year, Dam Height=81.5 m, Design Demand=18.5%] (1/3)............................................ 533
Table D-271 Results of Proposed Mananga-II Dam in WRR-VII (Cebu) [Case: Sediment Yield=1.58
mm/year, Dam Height=81.5 m, Design Demand=18.5%] (2/3)............................................ 534
Table D-272 Results of Proposed Mananga-II Dam in WRR-VII (Cebu) [Case: Sediment Yield=1.58
mm/year, Dam Height=81.5 m, Design Demand=18.5%] (3/3)............................................ 534
Table D-273 Summary of Reservoir Operation Study for Proposed Mananga-II Dam in WRR-VII (Cebu)...
........................................................................................................................................... 535
Table D-274 Futures of Proposed Kotkot Dam in WRR-VII (Cebu) [Case: Sediment Yield=2.179 mm/year,
Dam Height=61.5m, Design Demand=3.7%] ....................................................................... 537
Table D-275 Results of Proposed Kotkot Dam in WRR-VII (Cebu) [Case: Sediment Yield=2.179 mm/year,
Dam Height=61.5m, Design Demand=3.7%] (1/3)............................................................... 538
Table D-276 Results of Proposed Kotkot Dam in WRR-VII (Cebu) [Case: Sediment Yield=2.179 mm/year,
Dam Height=61.5m, Design Demand=3.7%] (2/3)............................................................... 539
Table D-277 Results of Proposed Kotkot Dam in WRR-VII (Cebu) [Case: Sediment Yield=2.179 mm/year,
Dam Height=61.5m, Design Demand=3.7%] (3/3)............................................................... 539
Table D-278 Summary of Reservoir Operation Study for Proposed Kotkot Dam in WRR-VII (Cebu) . 540
Table D-279 Futures of Proposed Languyon Dam in WRR-VII (Cebu) [Case: Sediment Yield=1.684
mm/year, Dam Height=91.5 m, Design Demand=17.0%] .................................................... 542
Table D-280 Results of Proposed Languyon Dam in WRR-VII (Cebu) [Case: Sediment Yield=1.684
mm/year, Dam Height=91.5 m, Design Demand=17.0%] (1/3)............................................ 543
Table D-281 Results of Proposed Languyon Dam in WRR-VII (Cebu) [Case: Sediment Yield=1.684
mm/year, Dam Height=91.5 m, Design Demand=17.0%] (2/3)............................................ 543
Table D-282 Results of Proposed Languyon Dam in WRR-VII (Cebu) [Case: Sediment Yield=1.684
mm/year, Dam Height=91.5 m, Design Demand=17.0%] (3/3)............................................ 544
Table D-283 Summary of Reservoir Operation Study for Proposed Languyon Dam in WRR-VII (Cebu) ..
........................................................................................................................................... 545
Table D-284 Futures of Proposed Inabanga Dam in WRR-VII (Bohol) [Case: Sediment Yield=0.553
mm/year, Dam Height=41.5m, Design Demand=20.0%] ..................................................... 547
Table D-285 Results of Proposed Inabanga Dam in WRR-VII (Bohol) [Case: Sediment Yield=0.553
mm/year, Dam Height=41.5m, Design Demand=20.0%] (1/3)............................................. 547
Table D-286 Results of Proposed Inabanga Dam in WRR-VII (Bohol) [Case: Sediment Yield=0.553
Table D-332 Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) by Hershfield’s Method for Proposed Davao-III Dam
Site by Using Annual Maximum Daily Rainfall at Davao Station ........................................ 597
Table D-333 Runoff Coefficient................................................................................................................. 599
Table D-334 Estimated Flood Peak Discharge by Rational Formula at Davao-II Dam Site ...................... 600
Table D-335 Estimated Flood Peak Discharge by Rational Formula at Davao-III Dam Site .................... 600
Table D-336 Summary of Estimated Flood Peak Discharge by SCS Unit Hydrograph at Proposed Davao-
II Dam Site ............................................................................................................................ 604
Table D-337 Summary of Estimated Flood Peak Discharge by SCS Unit Hydrograph at Proposed Davao-
III Dam Site ........................................................................................................................... 605
Table D-338 Annual Maximum Daily Basin Mean Rainfall at Daet, Legazpi and Masbate (PAGASA) .. 606
Table D-339 Probable Daily Point Rainfall at Daet (PAGASA) ................................................................ 607
Table D-340 Probable Daily Point Rainfall at Legazpi Station (PAGASA) .............................................. 608
Table D-341 Probable Daily Point Rainfall at Masbate Station (PAGASA).............................................. 609
Table D-342 Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) by Hershfield’s Method for Proposed Sipokot Dam
Site by Using Annual Maximum Daily Rainfall at Daet Station ........................................... 610
Table D-343 Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) by Hershfield’s Method for Lake Buhi Regulation Site
by Using Annual Maximum Daily Rainfall at Legazpi Station............................................. 611
Table D-344 Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) by Hershfield’s Method for Proposed Lanang Dam
Site by Using Annual Maximum Daily Rainfall at Masbate Station ..................................... 612
Table D-345 Runoff Coefficient................................................................................................................. 614
Table D-346 Estimated Flood Peak Discharge by Rational Formula at Sipocot Dam Site ........................ 615
Table D-347 Estimated Flood Peak Discharge by Rational Formula at Lake Buhi Site ............................ 615
Table D-348 Estimated Flood Peak Discharge by Rational Formula at Lanang Dam Site ........................ 616
Table D-349 Summary of Estimated Flood Peak Discharge by SCS Unit Hydrograph at Proposed Sipocot
Dam Site ................................................................................................................................ 619
Table D-350 Summary of Estimated Flood Peak Discharge by SCS Unit Hydrograph at Lake Buhi
Regulation Site ...................................................................................................................... 620
Table D-351 Summary of Estimated Flood Peak Discharge by SCS Unit Hydrograph at Proposed Lanang
Dam Site ................................................................................................................................ 621
Table D-352 Summary of Estimated Flood Peak Discharge by SCS Unit Hydrograph at Proposed Dam Sites
........................................................................................................................................... 623
List of Figures
Figure D-1 Collected Rainfall Data Stations by PAGASA and DOST-ASTI ............................................. 3
Figure D-2 Isohyetal Map of Mean Annual Rainfall from 1981 to 2020 by CHIRPS (1/3) ........................ 4
Figure D-3 Isohyetal Map of Mean Annual Rainfall from 1981 to 2020 by CHIRPS (2/3) ........................ 4
Figure D-4 Isohyetal Map of Mean Annual Rainfall from 1981 to 2020 by CHIRPS (3/3) ........................ 5
Figure D-5 Location Map of Daily Discharge Observation Stations used for Low Flow Analysis (Total 453
Stations) .................................................................................................................................... 6
Figure D-6 Provincial Mean Monthly Rainfall and Mean Monthly Temperature from 1979 to 2020 (42
Years) in Each WRR ................................................................................................................. 7
Figure D-7 Estimated Daily Potential Evapotranspiration of FAO-ETo and Hamon Method..................... 9
Figure D-8 Climate Regions in Philippines ............................................................................................... 10
Figure D-9 Major River Basins in the Philippines ..................................................................................... 12
Figure D-10 Administrative Regions in Philippines .................................................................................... 15
Figure D-11 Existing Dams and Diversions in Angat River Basin.............................................................. 19
Figure D-12 Outflows from Angat Reservoir .............................................................................................. 19
Figure D-13 Existing Dams and Diversions in Pampanga River Basin ....................................................... 19
Figure D-14 Work Flow and Inputs and Outputs of Hydrological Analysis ............................................... 25
Figure D-15 Concept of Surface Analysis Model (Tank Model) and Groundwater Potential ..................... 26
Figure D-16 The Data Availability of the Three Datasets ........................................................................... 27
Figure D-17 Scatter Diagrams of Monthly Rainfall at Clark in Pampanga ................................................. 28
Figure D-18 Contour Map of the Philippines and Iso-hyetal Maps (1998 Master Plan and ERA5) ............ 30
Figure D-19 Contour Map of the Philippines and Iso-hyetal Maps (1998 Master Plan and CHIRPS) ........ 31
Figure D-20 Contour Map of the Philippines and Iso-hyetal Maps (1998 Master Plan and GSMaP) ......... 32
Figure D-21 Conceptual Diagram of Tank Model Considering the Paddy Field Tank ............................... 35
Figure D-22 Observed and Simulated Reservoir Operation at Magat Dam ................................................. 38
Figure D-23 Observed and Simulated Reservoir Operation at San Roque Dam ......................................... 39
Figure D-24 Observed and Simulated Reservoir Operation at Angat Dam ................................................. 39
Figure D-25 Observed and Simulated Reservoir Operation at Pantabangan Dam ...................................... 40
Figure D-26 Example of Flow Duration Curves (FDC) of Specific Discharge (m3/sec/km2) ..................... 41
Figure D-27 Modeled Sub-Basins in WRR-I, Abra River Basin ................................................................. 42
Figure D-28 Modeled Sub-Basins in WRR-II, Cagayan River Basin.......................................................... 43
Figure D-29 Modeled Sub-Basins in WRR-II, Abulog River Basin............................................................ 44
Figure D-30 Modeled Sub-Basins in WRR-III, Agno River Basin ............................................................. 45
Figure 2.331 Modeled Sub-Basins in WRR-III, Pampanga River Basin ...................................................... 46
Figure D-32 Modeled Sub-Basins in WRR-IV, Pasig-Laguuna de Bay Basin ............................................ 47
Figure D-33 Modeled Sub-Basins in WRR-IV, Mindoro Island ................................................................. 47
Figure D-35 Modeled Sub-Basins in WRR-V, Bicol................................................................................... 49
Figure D-36 Modeled Sub-Basins in WRR-VI, Panay ................................................................................ 50
Figure D-115 Results of Groundwater Model Calibration of WRR-VI, Jalaur River Basin ....................... 139
Figure D-116 Results of Groundwater Model Calibration of WRR-VI, Ilog-Hilabangan River Basin ....... 140
Figure D-117 Results of Groundwater Model Calibration of WRR-VII, Cebu River Basin ....................... 140
Figure D-118 Results of Groundwater Model Calibration of WRR-VII, Negros Oriental River Basin ...... 141
Figure D-119 Results of Groundwater Model Calibration of WRR-VII, Bohol River Basin ...................... 142
Figure D-120 Results of Groundwater Model Calibration of WRR-VIII, Samar & Leyte River Basin ...... 143
Figure D-121 Results of Groundwater Model Calibration of WRR-IX, Southwestern Mindanao River Basin
......................................................................................................................................... 145
Figure D-122 Results of Groundwater Model Calibration of WRR-X, Agusan & Cagayan de Oro River Basin
......................................................................................................................................... 146
Figure D-123 Results of Groundwater Model Calibration of WRR-XI, Davao & Tagum-Libuganon River
Basin...................................................................................................................................... 148
Figure D-124 Results of Groundwater Model Calibration of WRR-XII, Mindanao River Basin ............... 149
Figure D-125 Comparison of Water Balance of Surface Water in 2050 by WRR (Present Weather
Condition) [Irrigation WR=NIMP] ....................................................................................... 155
Figure D-126 Comparison of Water Balance of Surface Water in 2050 by WRR (Present Weather
Condition) [Irrigation WR=JST] ........................................................................................... 156
Figure D-127 Comparison of Water Balance of Surface Water in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5-Low Condition)
[Irrigation WR= NIMP] ........................................................................................................ 157
Figure D-128 Comparison of Water Balance of Surface Water in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5-Low Condition)
[Irrigation WR= JST] ............................................................................................................ 158
Figure D-129 Comparison of Water Balance of Surface Water in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5- Median
Condition) [Irrigation WR= NIMP] ...................................................................................... 159
Figure D-130 Comparison of Water Balance of Surface Water in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5- Median
Condition) [Irrigation WR= JST] .......................................................................................... 160
Figure D-131 Comparison of Water Balance of Surface Water in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5- High Condition)
[Irrigation WR= NIMP] ........................................................................................................ 161
Figure D-132 Comparison of Water Balance of Surface Water in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5- High Condition)
[Irrigation WR= JST] ............................................................................................................ 162
Figure D-133 Comparison of Water Balance of Groundwater in 2050 by WRR (Present Weather Condition)
[Irrigation WR=NIMP] ......................................................................................................... 163
Figure D-134 Comparison of Water Balance of Groundwater in 2050 by WRR (Present Weather Condition)
[Irrigation WR=JST] ............................................................................................................. 164
Figure D-135 Comparison of Water Balance of Groundwater in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5-Low Condition)
[Irrigation WR= NIMP] ........................................................................................................ 165
Figure D-136 Comparison of Water Balance of Groundwater in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5-Low Condition)
[Irrigation WR= JST] ............................................................................................................ 166
Figure D-137 Comparison of Water Balance of Groundwater in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5- Median Condition)
[Irrigation WR= NIMP] ........................................................................................................ 167
Figure D-138 Comparison of Water Balance of Groundwater in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5- Median Condition)
[Irrigation WR= JST] ............................................................................................................ 168
Figure D-139 Comparison of Water Balance of Groundwater in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5- High Condition)
[Irrigation WR= NIMP] ........................................................................................................ 169
Figure D-140 Comparison of Water Balance of Groundwater in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5- High Condition)
[Irrigation WR= JST] ............................................................................................................ 170
Figure D-141 Comparison of Water Balance of Total (SW+GW) in 2050 by WRR (Present Weather
Condition) [Irrigation WR=NIMP] ....................................................................................... 171
Figure D-142 Comparison of Water Balance of Total (SW+GW) in 2050 by WRR (Present Weather
Condition) [Irrigation WR=JST] ........................................................................................... 172
Figure D-143 Comparison of Water Balance of Total (SW+GW) in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5-Low Condition)
[Irrigation WR= NIMP] ........................................................................................................ 173
Figure D-144 Comparison of Water Balance of Total (SW+GW) in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5-Low Condition)
[Irrigation WR= JST] ............................................................................................................ 174
Figure D-145 Comparison of Water Balance of Total (SW+GW) in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5- Median
Condition) [Irrigation WR= NIMP] ...................................................................................... 175
Figure D-146 Comparison of Water Balance of Total (SW+GW) in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5- Median
Condition) [Irrigation WR= JST] .......................................................................................... 176
Figure D-147 Comparison of Water Balance of Total (SW+GW) in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5- High
Condition) [Irrigation WR= NIMP] ...................................................................................... 177
Figure D-148 Comparison of Water Balance of Total (SW+GW) in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5- High
Condition) [Irrigation WR= JST] .......................................................................................... 178
Figure D-149 Monthly Water Balance of Total (SW+GW) in Dry Season in 2050 by WRR (Present Weather
Condition) [Irrigation WR= JST] .......................................................................................... 179
Figure D-150 Monthly Water Balance of Total (SW+GW) in Dry Season in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5- Low
Condition) [Irrigation WR= JST] .......................................................................................... 180
Figure D-151 Monthly Water Balance of Total (SW+GW) in Dry Season in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5-
Median Condition) [Irrigation WR= JST] ............................................................................. 181
Figure D-152 Monthly Water Balance of Total (SW+GW) in Dry Season in 2050 by WRR (RCP8.5- High
Condition) [Irrigation WR= JST] .......................................................................................... 182
Figure D-153 Summary of Monthly Water Balance and Water Demand Sufficiency Fill-Rate of 1/5-Dry Year
in 2050 [Weather=RCP8.5-Median] [IWD=JPT] ................................................................. 195
Figure D-154 Conceptual Diagram of the SHER Model ............................................................................. 197
Figure D-155 Concept of the SHER Model ................................................................................................. 198
Figure D-156 Conceptual Diagram of Recharging and Discharging Area .................................................. 198
Figure D-157 Division of Watershed into Recharging and Discharging Blocks ......................................... 199
Figure D-158 Relationship among the Blocks of SHER Model .................................................................. 199
Figure D-159 Schematic Image of Pervious Model..................................................................................... 200
Figure D-160 Example of Soil Moisture Content - Suction (−) Curves .................................................. 202
Figure D-161 Location of WRR-VII and the Major Cities .......................................................................... 204
Figure D-162 Sub-Basins for SHER Model in WRR-VII ........................................................................... 204
Figure D-163 Field Survey of PAGASA Weather Stations in WRR-VII and XI ........................................ 205
Figure D-164 Field Survey of DPWH River Water and Discharge Gauging Stations in WRR-V .............. 206
Figure D-165 Field Survey of DPWH River Water and Discharge Gauging Stations in WRR-VII............ 207
Figure D-166 Field Survey of DPWH River Water and Discharge Gauging Stations in WRR-XI ............. 207
Figure D-167 Results of Field Survey of Soils in WRR-V .......................................................................... 209
Figure D-168 Results of Field Survey of Soils in Cebu, WRR-VII ............................................................. 210
Figure D-169 Results of Field Survey of Soils in Bohol, WRR-VII ........................................................... 210
Figure D-170 Results of Field Survey of Soils in Negros Oriental, WRR-XI ............................................. 211
Figure D-171 Results of Field Survey of Soils in WRR-XI ........................................................................ 211
Figure D-172 Example of Simulated and Observed Discharge Hydrograph and FDC in WRR-V ............. 214
Figure D-173 Example of Simulated and Observed Discharge Hydrograph and FDC in WRR-VII........... 214
Figure D-174 Example of Simulated and Observed Discharge Hydrograph and FDC in WRR-XI ............ 214
Figure D-175 Calibrated Sub-Basins in WRR-V ......................................................................................... 215
Figure D-176 Calibrated Sub-Basins in WRR-VII ...................................................................................... 216
Figure D-177 Calibrated Sub-Basins in WRR-XI ....................................................................................... 217
Figure D-178 Location Map of Discharge Observation Stations in WRR-VII by DPWH .......................... 218
Figure D-179 Sub-Basins of SHER Model in WRR-VII (1/4) .................................................................... 219
Figure D-180 Sub-Basins of SHER Model in WRR-VII (2/4) .................................................................... 219
Figure D-181 Sub-Basins of SHER Model in WRR-VII (3/4) .................................................................... 220
Figure D-182 Sub-Basins of SHER Model in WRR-VII (4/4) .................................................................... 220
Figure D-183 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Old-Bago in WRR-VII (Cebu) (1) .......................... 221
Figure D-184 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Old-Bago in WRR-VII (Cebu) (2) .......................... 221
Figure D-185 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Sta-Ana in WRR-VII (Cebu) .................................. 222
Figure D-186 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Media in WRR-VII (Cebu) ..................................... 222
Figure D-187 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Jomgao in WRR-VII (Cebu) ................................... 223
Figure D-188 Results of SHER Model Calibration in WRR-VII (Cebu) Flow Duration Curves of Observed
and Simulated Discharge ....................................................................................................... 223
Figure D-189 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Tanguhay in WRR-VII (Bohol) (1/2)...................... 224
Figure D-190 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Tanguhay in WRR-VII (Bohol) (2/2)...................... 224
Figure D-191 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Mambo-ol in WRR-VII (Bohol) ............................. 225
Figure D-192 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Manaba in WRR-VII (Bohol) (1.3) ......................... 225
Figure D-193 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Manaba in WRR-VII (Bohol) (2.3) ......................... 226
Figure D-194 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Manaba in WRR-VII (Bohol) (3/3) ......................... 226
Figure D-195 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Loboc in WRR-VII (Bohol) .................................... 227
Figure D-196 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Hibayog in WRR-VII (Bohol)................................. 227
Figure D-197 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Abatan in WRR-VII (Bohol) ................................... 228
Figure D-198 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Antequera in WRR-VII (Bohol) .............................. 228
Figure D-199 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Gabayan in WRR-VII (Bohol) ................................ 229
Figure D-200 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Malinao Dam in WRR-VII (Bohol) ........................ 229
Figure D-201 Results of SHER Model Calibration in WRR-VII (Bohol) Flow Duration Curves of Observed
and Simulated Discharge ....................................................................................................... 230
Figure D-202 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Alum in WRR-VII (Negros Oriental) ..................... 230
Figure D-203 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Negros-Anulod in WRR-VII (Negros Oriental) (1/2) ...
......................................................................................................................................... 231
Figure D-204 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Negros-Anulod in WRR-VII (Negros Oriental) (2/2) ...
......................................................................................................................................... 231
Figure D-205 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Bais in WRR-VII (Negros Oriental) ....................... 232
Figure D-206 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Okoy in WRR-VII (Negros Oriental)...................... 232
Figure D-207 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Siaton in WRR-VII (Negros Oriental) (1/2)............ 233
Figure D-208 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Siaton in WRR-VII (Negros Oriental) (2/2)............ 233
Figure D-209 Results of SHER Model Calibration in WRR-VII (Negros Oriental) Flow Duration Curves of
Observed and Simulated Discharge....................................................................................... 234
Figure D-210 Location Map of Discharge Observation Stations in WRR-XI by DPWH ........................... 235
Figure D-211 Sub-Basins of SHER Model in WRR-XI (1/4) ..................................................................... 236
Figure D-212 Sub-Basins of SHER Model in WRR-XI (2/4) ..................................................................... 236
Figure D-213 Sub-Basins of SHER Model in WRR-XI (3/4) ..................................................................... 237
Figure D-214 Sub-Basins of SHER Model in WRR-XI (4/4) ..................................................................... 237
Figure D-215 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Zoragoza in WRR-XI .............................................. 238
Figure D-216 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Quinonoan in WRR-XI ........................................... 238
Figure D-217 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Bitangan in WRR-XI............................................... 239
Figure D-218 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Matiao in WRR-XI.................................................. 239
Figure D-219 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Apokon in WRR-XI (1/7) ....................................... 240
Figure D-220 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Apokon in WRR-XI (2/7) ....................................... 240
Figure D-221 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Apokon in WRR-XI (3/7) ....................................... 241
Figure D-222 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Apokon in WRR-XI (4/7) ....................................... 241
Figure D-223 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Apokon in WRR-XI (5/7) ....................................... 242
Figure D-224 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Apokon in WRR-XI (6/7) ....................................... 242
Figure D-225 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Apokon in WRR-XI (7/7) ....................................... 243
Figure D-226 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Tiburcia in WRR-XI ............................................... 243
Figure D-227 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Maniki in WRR-XI (1/2) ......................................... 244
Figure D-228 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Maniki in WRR-XI (2/2) ......................................... 244
Figure D-229 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Asuncion in WRR-XI (1/6) ..................................... 245
Figure D-230 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Asuncion in WRR-XI 2/6) ...................................... 245
Figure D-231 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Asuncion in WRR-XI 3/6) ...................................... 246
Figure D-232 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Asuncion in WRR-XI 4/6) ...................................... 246
Figure D-233 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Asuncion in WRR-XI (5/6) ..................................... 247
Figure D-234 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Asuncion in WRR-XI (6/6) ..................................... 247
Figure D-235 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Menzi in WRR-XI (1/4) .......................................... 248
Figure D-236 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Menzi in WRR-XI (2/4) .......................................... 248
Figure D-237 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Menzi in WRR-XI (3/4) .......................................... 249
Figure D-238 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Menzi in WRR-XI (4/4) .......................................... 249
Figure D-239 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Panalumin WRR-XI (1/2) ....................................... 250
Figure D-240 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Panalumin in WRR-XI (2/2) ................................... 250
Figure D-241 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Marilog in WRR-XI (1/7) ....................................... 251
Figure D-242 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Marilog in WRR-XI (2/7) ....................................... 251
Figure D-243 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Marilog in WRR-XI (3/7) ....................................... 252
Figure D-244 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Marilog in WRR-XI (4/7) ....................................... 252
Figure D-245 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Marilog in WRR-XI (5/7) ....................................... 253
Figure D-246 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Marilog in WRR-XI (6/7) ....................................... 253
Figure D-247 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Marilog in WRR-XI (7/7) ....................................... 254
Figure D-248 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Los Amigo in WRR-XI ........................................... 254
Figure D-249 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Los Amigo in WRR-XI ........................................... 255
Figure D-250 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Barangay in WRR-XI.............................................. 255
Figure D-251 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Cebulan in WRR-XI (1/2) ....................................... 256
Figure D-252 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Cebulan in WRR-XI (2/2) ....................................... 256
Figure D-253 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Tres de Mayo in WRR-XI (1/3) .............................. 257
Figure D-254 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Tres de Mayo in WRR-XI (2/3) .............................. 257
Figure D-255 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Tres de Mayo in WRR-XI (3/3) .............................. 258
Figure D-256 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Tamlagon in WRR-XI (1/4) .................................... 258
Figure D-257 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Tamlagon in WRR-XI (2/4) .................................... 259
Figure D-258 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Tamlagon in WRR-XI (3/4) .................................... 259
Figure D-259 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Tamlagon in WRR-XI (4/4) .................................... 260
Figure D-260 Location Map of Discharge Observation Stations in WRR-V by DPWH ............................. 261
Figure D-261 Sub-Basins of SHER Model in WRR-V (1/4) ....................................................................... 262
Figure D-262 Sub-Basins of SHER Model in WRR-V (2/4) ....................................................................... 262
Figure D-263 Sub-Basins of SHER Model in WRR-V (3/4) ....................................................................... 263
Figure D-264 Sub-Basins of SHER Model in WRR-V (4/4) ....................................................................... 263
Figure D-265 Calibrated Sub-Basins in WRR-V (Bicol) ............................................................................ 264
Figure D-266 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Labo in WRR-V (Bicol) (1/8) ................................. 264
Figure D-267 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Labo in WRR-V (Bicol) (2/8) ................................. 265
Figure D-268 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Labo in WRR-V (Bicol) (3/8) ................................. 265
Figure D-269 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Labo in WRR-V (Bicol) (4/8) ................................. 266
Figure D-270 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Labo in WRR-V (Bicol) (5/8) ................................. 266
Figure D-271 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Labo in WRR-V (Bicol) (6/8) ................................. 267
Figure D-272 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Labo in WRR-V (Bicol) (7/8) ................................. 267
Figure D-273 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Labo in WRR-V (Bicol) (8/8) ................................. 268
Figure D-274 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Culacling in WRR-V (Bicol) (1/2) .......................... 268
Figure D-275 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Culacling in WRR-V (Bicol) (2/2) .......................... 269
Figure D-276 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Pulantuna in WRR-V (Bicol) (1/2) ......................... 269
Figure D-277 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Pulantuna in WRR-V (Bicol) (2/2) ......................... 270
Figure D-278 Results of SHER Model Calibration at San Isidro in WRR-V (Bicol) .................................. 270
Figure D-279 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Manguiring in WRR-V (Bicol) ............................... 271
Figure D-280 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Cagaycay in WRR-V (Bicol) .................................. 271
Figure D-281 Calibrated Sub-Basins in WRR-V (Bicol) ............................................................................ 272
Figure D-282 Results of SHER Model Calibration San Francisco in WRR-V (Bicol) ............................... 272
Figure D-283 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Cabilogan in WRR-V (Bicol).................................. 273
Figure D-284 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Talisay in WRR-V (Bicol) ...................................... 273
Figure D-285 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Bicol in WRR-V (Bicol) (1/5)................................. 274
Figure D-286 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Bicol in WRR-V (Bicol) (2/5)................................. 274
Figure D-287 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Bicol in WRR-V (Bicol) (3/5)................................. 275
Figure D-288 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Bicol in WRR-V (Bicol) (4/5)................................. 275
Figure D-289 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Bicol in WRR-V (Bicol) (5/5)................................. 276
Figure D-290 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Lalo in WRR-V (Bicol) ........................................... 276
Figure D-291 Results of SHER Model Calibration at La Purisima in WRR-V (Bicol)............................... 277
Figure D-292 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Pawili in WRR-V (Bicol) (1/3) ............................... 277
Figure D-293 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Pawili in WRR-V (Bicol) (2/3) ............................... 278
Figure D-294 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Pawili in WRR-V (Bicol) (3/3) ............................... 278
Figure D-295 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Quinali in WRR-V (Bicol) ...................................... 279
Figure D-296 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Donsol in WRR-V (Bicol) ...................................... 279
Figure D-297 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Pawic in WRR-V (Bicol) ........................................ 280
Figure D-298 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Togas in WRR-V (Bicol) ........................................ 280
Figure D-299 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Sto. Domingo in WRR-V (Bicol) (1/2) ................... 281
Figure D-300 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Sto. Domingo in WRR-V (Bicol) (2/2) ................... 281
Figure D-301 Results of SHER Model Calibration at San Miguel in WRR-V (Catanduanes) .................... 282
Figure D-302 Results of SHER Model Calibration at Alibuag in WRR-V (Catanduanes) ......................... 282
Figure D-303 Location Map of Daily Discharge Observation Stations used for Low Flow Analysis (Total 25
Stations) ................................................................................................................................ 288
Figure D-304 Flow Duration Curve (FDC) of Observed Daily Discharge in WRR-VII ............................. 289
Figure D-305 Climate Regions in Philippines ............................................................................................. 291
Figure D-306 Provincial Mean Monthly Rainfall and Mean Monthly Temperature from 1979 to 2020 (42
Years) in Each Province in WRR-VII ................................................................................... 292
Figure D-307 Estimated Daily Potential Evapotranspiration of FAO-ETo and Hamon Method................. 292
Figure D-308 Surface Water Potentials (1/5-Dry Year) in WRR-VII ......................................................... 293
Figure D-309 Groundwater Potentials (1/5-Dry Year) in WRR-VII ........................................................... 294
Figure D-310 Quarterly Change of Precipitation by Province under Climate Change Scenarios from Present
Weather in 2050 (RCP8.5-Low Case) in WRR-VII .............................................................. 296
Figure D-311 Quarterly Change of Temperature by Province under Climate Change Scenarios from Present
Weather in 2050 (RCP8.5-Low Case) in WRR-VII .............................................................. 297
Figure D-312 Surface Water Potentials (Average) in WRR-VII (Unit: mm/day) ....................................... 298
Figure D-313 Groundwater Potentials (Average) in WRR-VII (Unit: mm/day) ......................................... 299
Figure D-314 Climate Regions in Philippines ............................................................................................. 301
Figure D-315 Provincial Mean Monthly Rainfall and Mean Monthly Temperature from 1979 to 2020 (42
Years) in Each Province in WRR-XI .................................................................................... 302
Figure D-316 Estimated Daily Potential Evapotranspiration of FAO-ETo and Hamon Method................. 303
Figure D-98 Location Map of Major Rivers and Principal Rivers in WRR XI ......................................... 303
Figure D-317 Location Map of Daily Discharge Observation Stations used for Low Flow Analysis (Total 25
Stations) ................................................................................................................................ 304
Figure D-318 Flow Duration Curve (FDC) of Observed Daily Discharge in WRR-XI .............................. 305
Figure D-319 Surface Water Potentials (1/5-Dry Year) in WRR-XI ........................................................... 307
Figure D-320 Groundwater Potentials (1/5-Dry Year) in WRR-XI............................................................. 308
Figure D-321 Quarterly Change of Precipitation by Province under Climate Change Scenarios from Present
Weather in 2050 (RCP8.5-Low Case) in Mindanao.............................................................. 309
Figure D-322 Quarterly Change of Temperature by Province under Climate Change Scenarios from Present
Weather in 2050 (RCP8.5-Low Case) in Mindanao.............................................................. 310
Figure D-323 Surface Water Potentials (1/5-Dry-Year) in WRR-XI (Unit: mm/day)................................. 311
Figure D-324 Groundwater Potentials (1/5-Dry-Year) in WRR-XI (Unit: mm/day) .................................. 312
Figure D-325 Climate Regions in Philippines ............................................................................................. 314
Figure D-326 Provincial Mean Monthly Rainfall and Mean Monthly Temperature from 1979 to 2020 (42
Years) in Each Province in WRR-V ...................................................................................... 315
Figure D-327 Estimated Daily Potential Evapotranspiration of FAO-ETo and Hamon Method................. 316
Figure D-102 Location Map of Major Rivers and Principal Rivers in WRR V........................................... 316
Figure D-328 Location Map of Daily Discharge Observation Stations used for Low Flow Analysis (Total 35
Stations) ................................................................................................................................ 318
Figure D-329 Flow Duration Curve (FDC) of Observed Daily Discharge in WRR-V ................................ 319
Figure D-330 Surface Water Potentials (1/5-Dry Year) in WRR-VII ......................................................... 322
Figure D-331 Groundwater Potentials (1/5-Dry Year) in WRR-VII ........................................................... 323
Figure D-332 Quarterly Change of Precipitation by Province under Climate Change Scenarios from Present
Weather in 2050 (RCP8.5-Low Case) in WRR-V ................................................................ 324
Figure D-333 Quarterly Change of Temperature by Province under Climate Change Scenarios from Present
Weather in 2050 (RCP8.5-Low Case) in WRR-V ................................................................ 325
Figure D-334 Surface Water Potentials (1/5-Dry-Year) in WRR-V (Unit: mm/day) .................................. 326
Figure D-335 Groundwater Potentials (1/5-Dry-Year) in WRR-V (Unit: mm/day) .................................... 327
Figure D-336 Irrigation Water Demand of Surface Water in WRR-VII ..................................................... 328
Figure D-426 Surface Water Balance by Province in WRR-XI at Each Climate Change Condition ....... 441
Figure D-427 Groundwater Balance by Province in WRR-XI at Each Climate Change Condition ......... 442
Figure D-428 Surface Water Balance by Province in WRR-V at Each Climate Change Condition ........ 449
Figure D-429 Groundwater Balance by Province in WRR-V at Each Climate Change Condition .......... 450
Figure D-430 Location Map of Major Cities in WRR-VII .......................................................................... 451
Figure D-431 Surface Water Balance of Metro Cebu in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 460
Figure D-432 Surface Water Balance of Metro Cebu in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 461
Figure D-433 Groundwater Balance of Metro Cebu in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 461
Figure D-434 Groundwater Balance of Metro Cebu in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 462
Figure D-435 Surface Water Balance of Toledo City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 462
Figure D-436 Surface Water Balance of Toledo City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 463
Figure D-437 Groundwater Balance of Toledo City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 463
Figure D-438 Groundwater Balance of Toledo City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 464
Figure D-439 Surface Water Balance of Tagbilaran City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 464
Figure D-440 Surface Water Balance of Tagbilaran City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 465
Figure D-441 Groundwater Balance of Tagbilaran City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 465
Figure D-442 Groundwater Balance of Tagbilaran City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 466
Figure D-443 Surface Water Balance of Panglao City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 466
Figure D-444 Surface Water Balance of Panglao City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 467
Figure D-445 Groundwater Balance of Panglao City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 467
Figure D-446 Groundwater Balance of Panglao City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 468
Figure D-447 Surface Water Balance of Carmen City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 468
Figure D-448 Surface Water Balance of Carmen City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 469
Figure D-449 Groundwater Balance of Carmen City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 469
Figure D-450 Groundwater Balance of Carmen City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 470
Figure D-451 Surface Water Balance of Inabanga City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 470
Figure D-452 Surface Water Balance of Inabanga City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 471
Figure D-453 Groundwater Balance of Inabanga City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 471
Figure D-454 Groundwater Balance of Inabanga City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 472
Figure D-455 Surface Water Balance of Dumaguete City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 472
Figure D-456 Surface Water Balance of Dumaguete City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 473
Figure D-457 Groundwater Balance of Dumaguete City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 473
Figure D-458 Groundwater Balance of Dumaguete City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 474
Figure D-459 Surface Water Balance of Sibulan City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 474
Figure D-460 Surface Water Balance of Sibulan City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 475
Figure D-461 Groundwater Balance of Sibulan City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 475
Figure D-462 Groundwater Balance of Sibulan City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 476
Figure D-463 Surface Water Balance of Siquijor Island in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 476
Figure D-464 Surface Water Balance of Siquijor Island in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 477
Figure D-465 Groundwater Balance of Siquijor Island in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 477
Figure D-466 Groundwater Balance of Siquijor Island in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 478
Figure D-467 Surface Water Balance by Major Cities in WRR-VII at Each Climate Change Condition 479
FigureD-468 Groundwater Balance by Major Cities in WRR-VII at Each Climate Change Condition .. 480
Figure D-469 Location Map of Major Cities in WRR-VII .......................................................................... 481
Figure D-470 Surface Water Balance by Major Cities in WRR-XI at Each Climate Change Condition . 486
Figure D-471 Groundwater Balance by Major Cities in WRR-XI at Each Climate Change Condition ... 487
Figure D-472 Location Map of Major Cities in WRR-VII .......................................................................... 488
Figure D-473 Surface Water Balance of Legazpi City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 492
Figure D-474 Surface Water Balance of Legazpi City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 492
Figure D-475 Groundwater Balance of Legazpi City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 493
Figure D-476 Groundwater Balance of Legazpi City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 493
Figure D-477 Surface Water Balance of Daet City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 494
Figure D-478 Surface Water Balance of Daet City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 494
Figure D-479 Groundwater Balance of Daet City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 495
Figure D-480 Groundwater Balance of Daet City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 495
Figure D-481 Surface Water Balance of Naga City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 496
Figure D-482 Surface Water Balance of Naga City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 496
Figure D-483 Groundwater Balance of Naga City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 497
Figure D-484 Groundwater Balance of Naga City in 1/5-Dry Year, (Present Weather Condition, Water
Demand=2050) ...................................................................................................................... 497
Figure D-485 Surface Water Balance by Major Cities in WRR-V at Each Climate Change Condition... 498
Figure D-486 Groundwater Balance by Major Cities in WRR-V at Each Climate Change Condition .... 498
Figure D-487 Location Map of Major River Basins in WRR-VII ............................................................... 499
Figure D-488 Surface Water Balance by Major River Basins in WRR-VII at Each Climate Change
Condition ............................................................................................................................... 509
FigureD-489 Groundwater Balance by Major River Basins in WRR-VII at Each Climate Change Condition
........................................................................................................................................... 510
Figure D-490 Location Map of Major River Basins in WRR-XI ................................................................ 511
Figure D-491 Surface Water Balance by Major River Basins in WRR-XI at Each Climate Change Condition
......................................................................................................................................... 515
Figure D-492 Groundwater Balance by Major River Basins in WRR-XI at Each Climate Change Condition
......................................................................................................................................... 515
Figure D-493 Location Map of Major River Basins in WRR-XI ................................................................ 516
Figure D-494 Surface Water Balance by Major River Basins in WRR-V at Each Climate Change Condition
......................................................................................................................................... 525
Figure D-495 Groundwater Balance by Major River Basins in WRR-V at Each Climate Change Condition
......................................................................................................................................... 526
Figure D-496 Location Map of Proposed Dam Sites in WRR-VII .............................................................. 527
Figure D-497 Reservoir Sediment Trapping Efficiency as per Brune (1953).............................................. 530
Figure D-498 Location Map of Proposed Mananga-II Dam Site in WRR-VII (Cebu)................................ 531
Figure D-499 Photos of Proposed Mananga-II Dam Site in WRR-VII (Cebu) ........................................... 531
Figure D-500 Reservoir Area-Storage Curve of Proposed Mananga-II Dam Site in WRR-VII (Cebu) ... 532
Figure D-501 Results of Reservoir Operation Study of Proposed Mananga-II Dam Site in WRR-VII (Cebu)
[Case: Sediment Yield=1.58 mm/year, Dam Height=81.5 m, Design Demand=18.5%] ...... 533
Figure D-502 Location Map of Proposed Kotkot Dam Site in WRR-VII (Cebu) ....................................... 536
Figure D-503 Photos of Proposed Kotkot Dam Site in WRR-VII (Cebu) ................................................... 536
Figure D-504 Reservoir Area-Storage Curve of Proposed Kotkot Dam Site in WRR-VII (Cebu) .......... 537
Figure D-505 Results of Reservoir Operation Study of Proposed Kotkot Dam Site in WRR-VII (Cebu) [Case:
Sediment Yield=2.179 mm/year, Dam Height=61.5m, Design Demand=3.7%] .................. 538
Figure D-506 Location Map of Proposed Languyon Dam Site in WRR-VII (Cebu) .................................. 541
Figure D-507 Reservoir Area-Storage Curve of Proposed Languyon Dam Site in WRR-VII (Cebu) ..... 541
Figure D-508 Results of Reservoir Operation Study of Proposed Languyon Dam Site in WRR-VII (Cebu)
[Case: Sediment Yield=1.684 mm/year, Dam Height=91.5 m, Design Demand=17.0%] .... 542
Figure D-509 Location Map of Proposed Inabanga Dam Site in WRR-VII (Bohol)................................... 546
Figure D-510 Reservoir Area-Storage Curve of Proposed Inabanga Dam Site in WRR-VII (Bohol)...... 546
Figure D-511 Results of Reservoir Operation Study of Proposed Inabanga Dam Site in WRR-VII (Bohol)
[Case: Sediment Yield=0.553 mm/year, Dam Height=41.5m, Design Demand=20.0%] ..... 547
Figure D-512 Location Map of Proposed Dam Sites in WRR-XI ............................................................... 551
Figure D-513 Photos of Proposed Davao-II Dam Site in WRR-XI ............................................................. 553
Figure D-514 Reservoir Area-Storage Curve of Proposed Davao-II Dam Site in WRR-XI .................... 553
Figure D-515 Results of Reservoir Operation Study of Proposed Davao-II Dam Site in WRR-XI [Case:
Sediment Yield=0.845 mm/year, Dam Height=131.5 m, Design Demand=1455%] ............ 554
Figure D-516 Photo of A Few kilometers from Davao-III Dam Site in WRR-XI ....................................... 558
Figure D-517 Reservoir Area-Storage Curve of Proposed Davao-III Dam Site in WRR-XI ...................... 558
Figure D-518 Results of Reservoir Operation Study of Proposed Davao-III Dam in WRR-XI [Case: Sediment
Yield=0.845 mm/year, Dam Height=141.5 m, Design Demand=260%] .............................. 560
Figure D-519 Location Map of Proposed Dam Sites in WRR-V ................................................................ 564
Figure D-520 Location Map of Proposed Sipocot Dam Site in WRR-V (Camarines Sur) .......................... 566
Figure D-521 Reservoir Area-Storage Curve of Proposed Sipocot Dam Site in WRR-V (Camarines Sur) ...
.......................................................................................................................................... 567
Figure D-522 Results of Reservoir Operation Study of Proposed Sipocot Dam Site in WRR-V (Camarines
Sur) [Case: Sediment Yield=0.97 mm/year, Dam Height=41.5m, Design Demand=780%] 568
Figure D-523 Location Map of Proposed Lanang Dam Site in WRR-V (Masbate) .................................... 571
Figure D-524 Photos of Proposed Lanang Dam Site in WRR-V (Masbate)................................................ 572
Figure D-525 Reservoir Area-Storage Curve of Proposed Lanang Dam Site in WRR-V (Masbate) ....... 572
Figure D-526 Results of Reservoir Operation Study of Proposed Lanang Dam Site in WRR-V (Masbate)
[Case: Sediment Yield=1.694 mm/year, Dam Height=61.5m, Design Demand=34.1%] ..... 573
Figure D-527 Frequency Curve of Daily Point Rainfall at Mactan Station (PAGASA) ............................. 577
Figure D-528 Frequency Curve of Daily Point Rainfall at Tagbilaran Station (PAGASA) ........................ 578
Figure D-529 Areal Reduction Factor (ARF) by WMO-No.1045 (2009) ................................................... 584
Figure D-530 Standard Dimensionless Hydrograph by SCS ....................................................................... 587
Figure D-531 Rainfall Distribution of 24hr Rainfall by SCS Type I-III and Mononobe’s Formula ........... 589
Figure D-532 Design Flood Hydrograph by SCS Unit Hydrograph Method at Proposed Mananga-II Dam
Site (1/100-years Return Period) ........................................................................................... 590
Figure D-533 Design Flood Hydrograph by SCS Unit Hydrograph Method at Proposed Kotkot Dam Site
(1/100-years Return Period) .................................................................................................. 591
Figure D-534 Design Flood Hydrograph by SCS Unit Hydrograph Method at Proposed Languyon Dam Site
(1/100-years Return Period) .................................................................................................. 592
Figure D-535 Design Flood Hydrograph by SCS Unit Hydrograph Method at Proposed Inabanga Dam Site
(1/100-years Return Period) .................................................................................................. 593
Figure D-536 Frequency Curve of Daily Point Rainfall at Davao Station (PAGASA) ............................... 595
Figure D-537 Areal Reduction Factor (ARF) by WMO-No.1045 (2009) ................................................... 599
Figure D-538 Standard Dimensionless Hydrograph by SCS ....................................................................... 601
Figure D-539 Rainfall Distribution of 24hr Rainfall by SCS Type I-III and Mononobe’s Formula ........... 603
Figure D-540 Design Flood Hydrograph by SCS Unit Hydrograph Method at Proposed Davao-II Dam Site
(1/100-years Return Period) .................................................................................................. 604
Figure D-541 Design Flood Hydrograph by SCS Unit Hydrograph Method at Proposed Davao-III Dam Site
(1/100-years Return Period) .................................................................................................. 605
Figure D-542 Frequency Curve of Daily Point Rainfall at Daet Station (PAGASA) .................................. 607
Figure D-543 Frequency Curve of Daily Point Rainfall at Legazpi Station (PAGASA)............................. 608
Figure D-544 Frequency Curve of Daily Point Rainfall at Masbate Station (PAGASA) ............................ 609
Figure D-545 Areal Reduction Factor (ARF) by WMO-No.1045 (2009) ................................................... 614
Figure D-546 Standard Dimensionless Hydrograph by SCS ....................................................................... 616
Figure D-547 Rainfall Distribution of 24hr Rainfall by SCS Type I-III and Mononobe’s Formula ........... 618
Figure D-548 Design Flood Hydrograph by SCS Unit Hydrograph Method at Proposed Sipocot Dam Site
(1/100-years Return Period) .................................................................................................. 620
Figure D-549 Design Flood Hydrograph by SCS Unit Hydrograph Method at Lake Buhi Regulation Site
(1/100-years Return Period) .................................................................................................. 621
Figure D-550 Design Flood Hydrograph by SCS Unit Hydrograph Method at Proposed Lanang Dam Site
(1/100-years Return Period) .................................................................................................. 622
Figure D-551 Creager's Curve for Determining Flood Discharges in Philippines (1/100-year Flood Return
Period) ................................................................................................................................... 624
In the hydrological analysis of Stage I, remote sensing data that was obtained early in home
work, and data of past projects will be utilized to streamline the work. Basic data such as remote
sensing data are required for hydrological analysis and water balance analysis, their types,
utilization methods, and significance. However, the latest data (river discharge, groundwater
level, etc.) owned by the Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services
Administration (PAGASA), NIA, the National Power Corporation (NPC) and DPWH were
collected through the local staff.
Table D-1 Basic Data Related to Hydrological Analysis
Data Type of Data Usage Method Significance
Item National Level Survey Detailed Survey in
Priority Region
Terrain SRTM, Resolution SRTM, Resolution 30 Used for topographic Save money and time
90 m (free) m (free) and parameter calculation of with DEM that can be
NAMRIA topographic Stage I hydrological model obtained free of
map (1/50,000) and facility design of water charge from the web.
source. Adjustment and
verification using
existing topographic
maps.
Surface Soil - FAO digital soil map, Used for surface soil Obtained free of
Classification resolution about 10 parameter estimation of charge from FAO,
km (free) Stage II runoff model. reducing cost and
time.
Geology - CCOP geological Used for estimating the Digital data saves time
information data hydraulic conductivity and and enables remote
1:1,000,000 scale porosity of Stages I and II analysis.
(free) groundwater models.
Land LANDSAT ESA Sentinel-2, Used for surface parameter It is possible to grasp
Cover/Land resolution 30 m resolution 10 m (free) estimation of Stage II changes of land use
Use (free). and Google Earth hydrological model. Used over time using long-
Interpretation of the (free) are used for land use of water term data of
past 30 years at 10- together. source and judgment of the LANDSAT and
year intervals number of houses verification of
(However, it takes a irrigation area and
considerable amount of cropping for each
time to read). period (However, it is
difficult to collect
cloudless images).
Precipitation/ ERA5 of ECMWF JAXA satellite global Used for input data of Data can be
Weather Data reanalysis data (31 precipitation map Stages I and II hydrological complemented in
km grid) 1979- GSMaP analysis models and areas where there is no
present and (approximately 11 km calculation of irrigation observation data, and
CHIRPS of USGS grid), 2000-present water requirements. analysis can be
satellite rainfall (free of charge) Observed and measured performed with
data (5 km grid) values and verification as uniform data with
1981-present necessary. little variation in
observation accuracy.
River Observed discharge Same as on the left. Used for calibration of Verify the output of
Discharge data of PAGASA Collect more observed Stages I and II hydrological the hydrological
Data and DPWH (paid) discharge data (paid). models. model based on the
observed values and
improve the accuracy.
Groundwater Groundwater Same as on the left. Used for calibration of The accuracy of the
Level Data observation data Collect more Stages I and II groundwater groundwater analysis
from PAGASA and observation data as models. model is improved by
NWRB needed. the measured values.
Aquifer Data CCOP geological Same as on the left. Used for input data (aquifer The accuracy of the
data (free) and Collect more thickness, saturated groundwater analysis
boring data from observation data as hydraulic conductivity, model is improved by
PAGASA needed. porosity, etc.) of Stages I the measured values.
and II groundwater models.
Water Usage National level, Regional level water Used for calibration of Verify the output of
Data inter-basin use data (all major Stages I and II runoff the hydrological
watershed data facilities of NIA), models and water demand model based on the
(around Manila), water intake data for forecasting. observed values and
large intake facility, water supply works, improve the accuracy.
dam dams, small ponds,
groundwater use
(water rights)
Note: SRTM:Space Shuttle Topography Mission Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Data, NAMRIA: National Mapping and Resource
Information Authority of the Philippines, CCOP: Coordinating Committee for Geoscience Programmes in East and Southeast Asia,
ESA:European Space Agency, ECMWF: European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts
In this survey, the JICA Survey Team decided to use remote sensing data because it is difficult
to travel to the site due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As for the precipitation data, the daily
rainfall data shown below was collected.
i) Daily rainfall of reanalysis meteorological data “ERA5” (European Centre for Medium-
Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), hourly data, spatial resolution: 0.25-degree grid;
approximately 31 km mesh) from 1979 to 2020,
ii) Daily satellite rainfall data “CHIRPS” (United States Geological Survey (USGS) and
Climate Hazards Center (CHC) scientists - supported by funding from United States
Agency for International Development (USAID), National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA), and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
daily data, spatial resolution: 0.05-degree grid; approximately 5 km mesh) from 1981 to
2020, and
iii) Daily satellite rainfall data “GSMaP” (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA),
hourly data, spatial resolution: 0.1-degree grid; approx. 11 km mesh) from 2000 to 2020.
As a result of comparative evaluation of the above data described later, it was decided to use
ERA5 from 1979 to 1980 and CHIRPS from 1981 to 2020 as described in Section 3.2.
For the purpose of calibrating the above reanalyzed rainfall data and satellite rainfall data,
monthly rainfall data were obtained from PAGASA for 15 synoptic stations. Also, from DOST-
Advanced Science and Technology Institute (ASTI), more than 1,000 observatories of
HYDROMETS data (10-minute, 15-minute, or hourly rainfall data) from 2012 to 2021 were
collected.
For most of the PAGASA synoptic stations, daily rainfall data are available for the period 1961
to 2021. Representative rainfall gauging stations were selected for each WRR. The rainfall
stations are to be used to calibrate reanalysis and satellite rainfall data and to validate streamflow
records from selected stream gauging stations. The locations of the representative rainfall
gauging stations and DOST-ASTI’s rainfall stations are shown in Figure below.
In this survey, the average daily rainfall by province from 1979 to 2020 was calculated using
the mesh rainfall data of ERA5 and CHIRPS, and used as input data for the rainfall-runoff model
(Tank Model) and for calculating the irrigation water requirement by province.
The isohyetal map of mean annual rainfall from 1981 to 2020 by CHIRPS is shown in Figures
below.
Figure D-2 Isohyetal Map of Mean Annual Rainfall from 1981 to 2020 by CHIRPS (1/3)
Figure D-3 Isohyetal Map of Mean Annual Rainfall from 1981 to 2020 by CHIRPS (2/3)
Figure D-4 Isohyetal Map of Mean Annual Rainfall from 1981 to 2020 by CHIRPS (3/3)
Frequency analysis was performed using total annual rainfall for each province. The total annual
rainfall values were ranked by Thomas plot as presented in Table in ANNEX-Hydrology.
Streamflow data were gathered for many of the stations within the survey area. Streamflow
records were obtained from DPWH, NPC, and NIA. DPWH provided daily average discharge
data for 431 locations. Also, river water level data were provided from DOST-ASTI. At the
DOST-ASTI stations, only the water level is available because there are no discharge
observation data. A total of 453 daily average discharge data shown in the Figures below were
collected and used for low flow analysis.
Source: JICA Survey Team based on the data of DPWH, NIA and NPC.
Figure D-5 Location Map of Daily Discharge Observation Stations used for Low Flow Analysis
(Total 453 Stations)
Unfortunately, these streamflow data were often missing as shown in Figures in ANNEX-
Hydrology. In addition, there are limits to the frequency of discharge observations and the
accuracy of the water level-discharge rating curves (H-Q curves), as there are many flows in
which the value of the flood discharge is questionable. There are many data at observatories
where the flow duration curves (FDCs) using the specific discharge are strange. Also, the annual
runoff at some stations exceeds the annual rainfall (runoff coefficient is more than 1.0).
Daily mean temperature from 1979 to 2020 of ERA5 (0.25-degree grid; approximately 31 km
mesh) were collected from the ECMWF reanalysis data sets. Provincial mean monthly rainfall
and mean monthly temperature from 1979 to 2020 (42 years) in each water resources region are
shown in Figure below.
29 29
29
700 27.3 27.7 27.1 27.0 700 26.9 27.2 26.6
700 26.6
26.2 27 25.9 25.6 25.7 25.6 27
27 25.5 25.4 25.1
600 24.9 25.1 25.0 24.5 600 600
24.3 24.2 24.1 24.3 24.5 24.1 24.0
23.7 23.7 25 25 23.6 25
500 500 22.9 22.9 500
22.5 22.5 22.3
21.9 479 23 23 23
400 435 400 452 400
404 398
300 21 300 21 300 21
345 340 344 332
295 316
200 19 200 19 200 19
238 252
218 196 205 227
17 170 192 197 183
100 100 17 100 17
17 15 34 84 63 98 72 89 80 121 43 33 50 71 106
0 15 0 15 0 15
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Rainfall Temperature Rainfall Temperature Rainfall Temperature
800
800
Mean Monthly Rainfall (mm/month)
WRR-X Agusan del Sur WRR-XI Davao del Sur WRR-XII North Cotabato
Mean Monthly Temperature (deg.C)
800 800
Mean Monthly Rainfall (mm/month)
29 29 27.8 27.4 29
700 26.9 26.6 26.4 26.7 26.6 700 700 27.1
26.5
25.5
26.4 26.4 26.0
27 25.6
26.3 26.3
25.8 25.6 25.7 25.7 25.8 25.7 25.4 27 26.1 26.4 26.0 26.1 26.1 26.2 26.4 26.3 27
25.4
600 24.9 25.0 600 25.0 25.1 600
25 25 25
500 500 500
514
23 23 23
400 441 400 400
300 21 300 21 300 21
342
313 311
284 300 293 279 283 274 19 200 19 260
292
260 261 19
200 241 225 244 200 233
208
17 100 178 181 186 198 162 17 161 163
198 178
17
100 133 102 121 121 144 100 136 125
0 15 0 15 0 15
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Rainfall Temperature Rainfall Temperature Rainfall Temperature
Figure D-6 Provincial Mean Monthly Rainfall and Mean Monthly Temperature
from 1979 to 2020 (42 Years) in Each WRR
Other climatological data were acquired from FAO-ClimWat. The data arc average monthly values as
shown in Table below.
[FAO-Penman-Monteith equation]
900
0.408∆(𝑅𝑛 − 𝐺 ) + 𝛾 𝑢 (𝑒 − 𝑒𝑎 )
𝐸𝑇𝑜 = 𝑇 + 273 2 𝑠
∆ + 𝛾 (1 + 0.34𝑢2 )
where,
ETo : reference evapotranspiration [mm day-1],
Rn : net radiation at the crop surface [MJ m-2 day-1],
G : soil heat flux density [MJ m-2 day-1],
T : mean daily air temperature at 2 m height [°C],
u2 : wind speed at 2 m height [m s-1],
es : saturation vapor pressure [kPa],
ea : actual vapor pressure [kPa],
es – ea : saturation vapor pressure deficit [kPa],
∆ : slope vapor pressure curve [kPa °C-1],
𝛾 : psychrometric constant [kPa °C-1].
[Hamon Equation]
𝐸𝑝 (𝑖 ) = 0.14𝐷0 (𝑖)2 𝑃𝑖
𝑇𝑖
𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑡 = 6.11 × 10^(7.5 × )
𝑇𝑖 + 237.15
where,
6.96 7.06
6.80 6.50
7 6.29 34 7 6.36 34 7 36
5.99 5.98
5.75 5.71 5.60
6 5.21 5.44 32 6 5.25 32 6 5.39 34
5.10 5.09 4.99 4.96 4.74 4.90
4.64 4.86 4.84 4.61 4.76 4.69 4.81 4.89 4.82
5 4.39 4.39 30 5 4.46 4.43 30 5 4.51 4.53 32
4 28 4 4.78 5.03 4.82 4.57 28 4 4.77 4.74 30
4.42 4.51
4.24 4.33 4.16 4.25 4.18 4.23 3.98
3 3.97 3.92 26 3 26 3 3.80 28
3.47 3.66 3.41 3.58 3.68 3.70
3.13 3.29 3.34 3.39
3.05 2.84 3.11 2.91 3.06 3.10
2 2.78 24 2 2.85 24 2 26
1 22 1 22 1 24
0 20 0 20 0 22
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
FAO-Penman Eto Hamon Evapo. Temperature FAO-Penman Eto Hamon Evapo. Temperature FAO-Penman Eto Hamon Evapo. Temperature
8 38
Daily Evapotranspiration (mm/day)
7.17
1 24 1 24 1 24
0 22 0 22 0 22
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
FAO-Penman Eto Hamon Evapo. Temperature FAO-Penman Eto Hamon Evapo. Temperature FAO-Penman Eto Hamon Evapo. Temperature
8 38 8 38
1 24 1 24 1 24
0 22 0 22 0 22
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
FAO-Penman Eto Hamon Evapo. Temperature FAO-Penman Eto Hamon Evapo. Temperature FAO-Penman Eto Hamon Evapo. Temperature
WRR-X Agusan del Sur WRR-XI Davao del Sur WRR-XII North Cotabato
Mean Monthly Temperature (deg.C)
Mean Monthly Temperature (deg.C)
Figure D-7 Estimated Daily Potential Evapotranspiration of FAO-ETo and Hamon Method
There are four climatological types that exist in the Philippines characterized as follows:
1) Type I: Two pronounced seasons, dry from November to April, wet during the rest of the
year
2) Type II: No dry season with a very pronounced maximum rainfall period from November
to January
3) Type III: Seasons are not very pronounced with relatively dry season from November to
April and wet season during the rest of the year.
4) Type IV: Rainfall more or less distributed throughout the year.
Figure below shows the distribution of these climate regions for the entire study area. Rainfall
intensities in the study area range from very light to heavy and may occur as continuous,
intermittent, or showery. Precipitation is influenced by prevailing air streams or monsoons,
tropical typhoons, the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), topography, fronts, easterly
waves, and local thunderstorms. The significance of each of these climatic influences varies
with the time of year.
The intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) affects precipitation from May to October. It
typically appears in the southwestern portion of the archipelago in May and moves north
reaching its northernmost position in July or August. It begins moving back southward in August
moving south of the Philippines by November and reaching its southernmost position in January
or February. In general, convective type precipitation occurs in the lTCZ.
Two major air streams, the northeast and southwest monsoons trigger the onset and recession of
the rainy season in the Philippines. Depending on location, the northeast monsoon may begin as
early as mid-July and ends as late as April. The southwest monsoon may begin as early as mid-
April and ends as late as early November depending on location. The southwest monsoon
produces more rain than the northeast monsoon. In general, the eastern coastal areas have
marked the rainy season from October to March when the northeast monsoon is dominant. The
rainy season for the western coastal areas occurs during the period from June to October when
the southwest monsoon and tropical cyclone seasons are dominant.
Topographic effects on precipitation have been documented. Previous studies have shown that
rainfall increases with elevation up to a certain level, above which further increases in elevation
result in decreased rainfall. Maximum rainfall occurs at intermediate elevations. Where rapid
changes in elevation occur, a phenomenon known as the "splash effect" significantly influences
precipitation. The "splash effect" results when cold air moves downslope from a precipitating
cloud and causes the formation of another cloud at a lower elevation.
Fronts affect precipitation in the Philippines in the winter months only. Fronts coupled with the
topographical effects produce a portion of the rainfall along the eastern coasts and occasionally
over the middle and western portions of the islands.
Easterly waves are frequent in the dry season and seldom occur during the winter months. These
are usually accompanied by precipitation especially along the mountainous, eastern coastal
areas.
Temperature
Based on the average of all weather stations in the Philippines excluding Baguio, the mean
annual temperature is 26.6°C. The warmest month is May, during which temperature averages
28.3°C, while the coolest month is January, during which temperature averages 25.5°C.
Humidity
Humidity refers to the moisture content of the atmosphere. Humidity is relatively high due to
the inherently high temperatures and the surrounding waters serving as a source of moisture. As
a result, humidity ranges from 71 to 85 percent.
Rainfall
Rainfall distribution throughout the country differs from one region to another, depending upon
the direction of the moisture-bearing winds and the location of the mountain systems. The mean
annual rainfall of the Philippines varies from 965 to 4,064 millimetres annually.
The Philippines has 18 major river basins, which occupy a total catchment area of 110,524 km2,
representing more than one-third of the country’s total land area. Among these river basins, the
largest in the country (and in Luzon) is the Cagayan River basin with a total catchment area of
27,494 km2 encompassing CAR and Region II, as well as the province of Aurora in Region III.
It is utilized for hydroelectric power as several dams and power plants are built within its
proximity. The second largest in the country (and largest in Mindanao) is the Mindanao River
basin with a total catchment area of 20,855 km2 encompassing Region X, Region XII, and
ARMM. The largest in Visayas (and eleventh largest in the country) is the Ilog-Hilabangan River
basin. It has a total catchment area of 1,945 km2 encompassing Region VI and Region VII. The
catchment area and map of the major river basins in the Philippines is shown in Figure below.
No. Name of River Basin Catchment
Area
(km2)
1 Cagayan River Basin 27,494
2 Mindanao River Basin 20,855
3 Agusan River Basin 11,937
4 Pampanga River Basin 10,435
5 Agno River Basin 6,219
6 Abra River Basin 5,125
7 Pasig-Laguna de Bay River 4,109
Basin
8 Bicol River Basin 3,171
9 Apayao-Abulug River Basin 3,776
10 Tagum-Libuganon River Basin 3,064
11 Ilog-Hilabangan River Basin 1,945
12 Panay River Basin 2,204
13 Ranao (Agus) River Basin 1,987
14 Tagoloan River Basin 1,801
15 Davao River Basin 1,760
16 Cagayan de Oro River Basin 1,374
17 Jalaur River Basin 1,765
18 Buayan-Malungon River Basin 1,505
TOTAL 110,524
Source: DENR-RBCO
Figure D-9 Major River Basins in the Philippines
(2) Lakes
According to the "Atlas of Philippine Inland Wetlands and Classified Caves, First Edition 2016
published by DENR-BMB, there are 221 lakes in the country that are mostly utilized for fish
production, with ten of them considered as major hosts for aquaculture production. The largest
among these lakes is the Laguna Lake with a total area of 900 km2. It is surrounded by NCR and
Region IV-A encompassing the provinces of Laguna and Rizal, and some cities in Metro Manila.
It is also considered as one of the five largest lakes in Southeast Asia. On the other hand, Lake
Lanao is the largest lake in Mindanao with a total area of 347 km2. Table below lists the major
lakes in the Philippines.
Table D-4 Major Lakes in the Philippines
Rank Name of Lake Location Surface Area (km2)
1 Laguna Lake Laguna and Rizal 900.00
2 Lanao Lanao del Sur 347.00
3 Taal Batangas 237.00
4 Mainit Agusan del Norte and Surigao del Norte 140.00
5 Naujan Oriental Mindoro 110.00
6 Buluan Maguindanao and Sultan Kudarat 65.00
7 Bato Camarines Sur 38.00
8 Buhi Camarines Sur 18.00
9 Dapao Lanao del Sur 10.00
10 Sebu South Cotabato 9.64
11 Wood Zamboanga del Sur 7.92
12 Manguao Palawan 6.43
13 Baao Camarines Sur 6.00
14 Paoay Ilocos Norte 4.20
15 Maughan South Cotabato 3.14
16 Danao Cebu 2.60
17 Pagusi Agusan del Norte 2.53
18 Pinamaloy Bukidnon 2.52
19 Balut Maguindanao 2.06
20 Imelda/Danao Leyte 1.97
21 Bito Leyte 1.50
22 Nunungan Lanao del Norte 1.48
23 Sampaloc Laguna 1.02
TOTAL 1,918.01
Note: Only those with area greater than 1 km2 are listed
Source: DA-BFAR, Philippine Fisheries Profile 2018
As a result of its archipelagic nature, the Philippines’ coastline is considered the fifth longest in
the world with a total length of 36,289 km. Greater proportions of its provinces (66 out of 81),
cities (88 out of 145), and municipalities (812 out of 1,489) lie along coastal areas. Its coastal
and marine waters cover a total area of about 266,000 km2, where the locals depend for
livelihood and sustenance. Table below lists the major fishing grounds in the Philippines which
consist of seas, bays, gulfs, and straits.
There are 343 independent principal river basins that have at least 40 km 2 of basin area each
identified over the whole country. Out of these, 20 river basins that have at least 990 km2 of the
basin area each are identified as the major river basins. These are Laoag, Cagayan, Pampanga,
Agno, Abra, Pasig-Laguna de Bay, Bicol and Abulug River basins in Luzon Island, the
Mindanao, Agusan, Tagum-Libuganon, Tagoloan, Agus, Davao, Cagayan De Oro and Buayan-
Malungum River basins in Mindanao Island, the Panay and Jalaur River basins in Panay Island,
the Amnay-Patrick River basin in Mindoro Island and the Ilog-Hilabangan River basin in Negros
Island. The 343 principal river basins cover a total land area of 199,637 km2 which is equivalent
to 66.5% of the total land area of the Philippines. The 20 major river basins cover a total area of
111,269 km2 equivalent to 37.1% of the total land arca of the Philippines or 55.7% of that of the
principal river basins.
Since the country is composed of comparatively small mountainous islands, its river basins in
general occupy small catchments with short river lengths. According to the JICA 1998 MP, the
rivers arc generally characterized by steep riverbed slopes and the coefficients of runoff mostly
fall within 0.6 to 0.7. Recently, the degradation of the river basins is becoming serious, causing
floods with short time of concentration and significant increase of sediment inflow as
experienced in the existing Magat reservoir. In the country, therefore, water resources
development associated with watershed management has become necessary.
Usually, the land of the Philippines is delineated in accordance with two different categories,
namely: boundaries of the water resources regions (WRR) and administrative regions.
In the former case, the Philippines is divided into 12 WRRs in consideration of hydrological
boundaries for the purpose of comprehensive planning of water resources development. These
are the Ilocos (WRR I), Cagayan Valley (WRR II), Central Luzon (WRR III), Southern Tagalog
(WRR IV), Bicol (WRR V), Western Visayas (WRR VI), Central Visayas (WRR VII), Eastern
Visayas (WRR VIII), Southwestern Mindanao (WRR IX), Northern Mindanao (WRR X),
Southeastern Mindanao (WRR XI), and Southern Mindanao (WRR XII). The locations of the
12 WRRs are shown in the intro Figure.
From the administrative aspect, the Philippines is divided into 17 regions, namely: Region I to
Region 13, and four other regions. These four regions comprise the National Capital Region
(NCR), Cordillera Administrative Region (CAR), Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao
(ARMM) and CARAGA. The NCR covers Metro Manila, the capital area of the country. These
17 administrative regions are further subdivided into such smaller political or administrative
units such as provinces and municipalities. The smallest administrative unit is the barangay. The
provinces included in each of the administrative regions are shown in Figure below.
Source: https://www.philatlas.com/regions.html
boundaries. On the other hand, the boundaries of the water resources regions in Mindanao are
quite different from those of administrative regions in terms of their areas as seen in Figure
belwo.
In a broad sense, the three WRRs in Mindanao, namely; Southwestern Mindanao (WRR IX),
Southeastern Mindanao (WRR XI) and Southern Mindanao (WRR XII), correspond to Western
Mindanao, Southern Mindanao, and Central Mindanao in the administrative regions. Thus, the
names of these three WRRs differ from those of the corresponding administrative regions.
The hydrological characteristics of each water resource region are shown in Tables below.
Table D-6 Hydrological Characteristics of Each Water Resource Region
WRR Region Hydrological Characteristics
I Ilocos There is a clear distinction between the rainy season and the dry season. There is a lot of
rainfall from May to December, and very little rainfall from January to March.
Temperature fluctuations are small, but the temperature is high from March to November.
The average annual rainfall is 2,555 mm/year, and the average annual temperature is about
23.9 °C. The proportion of total irrigated area of wet season in 2020 of wet season is as
large as 6.2% (790 km2) of the total water resources region.
II Cagayan Valley There is a clear distinction between the rainy season and the dry season. The rainy season
is from May to December with heavy rainfall, and from January to March with very little
rainfall. The temperature fluctuates greatly, and the temperature is high from March to
October. The average annual rainfall is 2,401 mm/year, and the average annual
temperature is about 25.4 °C. The proportion of irrigated area of wet season in 2020 is as
large as 7.8% (2,976 km2) of the entire water resources region.
III Central Luzon There is a clear distinction between the rainy season and the dry season. The rainy season
is from May to November with heavy rainfall, and from December to April with very
little rainfall. The temperature fluctuates greatly, and the temperature is high from April
to June. The average annual rainfall is 2,235 mm/year, and the average annual temperature
is about 25.5 °C. The proportion of irrigated area of wet season in 2020 will be 12.3%
(3,350 km2) of the total water resources region, which is the largest of all water resources
regions.
IV Southern Tagalog There is a clear distinction between the rainy season and the dry season. The rainy season
is from May to December with heavy rainfall, and from January to April with very little
rainfall. There is almost no change in temperature, and it is close to constant throughout
the year. The average annual rainfall is 1,986 mm/year, and the average annual
temperature is about 26.9 °C. The ratio of irrigated area in wet season in 2020 is 2.7%
(1,187 km2) of the total water resources region, which is smaller than other water
resources regions.
V Bicol The rainy season and the dry season are not so clearly distinguished and there is a lot of
rainfall throughout the year. The temperature is high from April to September. The
average annual rainfall is 2,908 mm/year, and the average annual temperature is about
26.8 °C. The ratio of irrigated area in the wet season in 2020 is 5.5% (984 km2) of the
entire water resources region, which is slightly higher than that of other water resources
regions.
VI Western Visayas The rainy season and the dry season are somewhat clearly distinguished. The rainy season
is from May to December. The temperature is high from March to June. The average
annual rainfall is 2,327 mm/year, and the average annual temperature is about 26.4 °C.
The proportion of irrigated area in the wet season in 2020 is 4.0% (830 km2) of the total
water resources region, which is about the average of other water resources regions.
VII Central Visayas The rainy season and the dry season are almost indistinguishable, and the rainfall is almost
constant throughout the year, but the rainfall from January to March is small. The
temperature is high from March to June. The average annual rainfall is 1,669 mm/year,
which is less than that of other water resources regions. The average annual temperature
is about 27.1 °C. The proportion of irrigated area in the wet season in 2020 is 3.2% (441
km2) of the total water resources region, which is smaller than other water resources
regions.
VIII Eastern Visayas The rainy season and the dry season are not so clearly distinguishable, and there is a lot
of rainfall throughout the year. Precipitation from October to January is high, and
precipitation from February to May is slightly low. The temperature is high from March
to September. The average annual rainfall is 2,779 mm/year, which is higher than that of
other water resources areas. The average annual temperature is about 26.8 °C. The
proportion of irrigated area in the wet season in 2020 is 3.8% (789 km2) of the total water
resources region, which is smaller than other water resources regions.
IX Southwestern Mindanao There is stable rainfall throughout the year, but the rainfall from June to November is
high, and the rainfall from January to April is slightly low. The temperature is almost
constant throughout the year. The average annual rainfall is 2,455 mm/year, and the
average annual temperature is about 26.1 °C. The proportion of irrigated area in the wet
season in 2020 is 2.3% (470 km2) of the total water resources region, which is smaller
than other water resources regions.
X Northern Mindanao There is stable rainfall throughout the year. Especially, there is a lot of rainfall from
December to March. The temperature is almost constant throughout the year. The average
annual rainfall is 3,778 mm/year, which is the highest compared with other water
resources regions. The average annual temperature is about 26.1 °C. The proportion of
irrigated area in the wet season in 2020 is 2.5% (595 km2) of the total water resources
region, which is smaller than other water resources regions.
XI Southeastern Mindanao The distinction between the rainy season and the dry season is not clear, and the amount
of precipitation is stable throughout the year. The amount of precipitation is rather high
from May to October. The temperature is almost constant throughout the year. The
average annual rainfall is 1,979 mm/year, which is the lowest compared with other water
resources regions. The average annual temperature is about 25.6 °C. The proportion of
irrigated area in the wet season in 2020 is 3.1% (827 km2) of the total water resources
region, which is smaller than other water resources regions.
XII Southern Mindanao There is rainfall throughout the year. Although it is not clear, the rainy season is from May
to November. The temperature is almost constant throughout the year, but the temperature
is high from March to May. The average annual rainfall is 2,578 mm/year, and the average
annual temperature is about 26.5 °C. The proportion of irrigated area in the wet season in
2020 is 3.2% (974 km2) of the total water resources region.
Source: JICA Survey Team
Table D-7 Total (SW+GW) Irrigation Service Area (km^2) in Wet Season by WRR in 2020
Province WRR-I WRR-II WRR-III WRR-IV WRR-V WRR-VI WRR-VII WRR-VIII WRR-IX WRR-X WRR-XI WRR-XII TOTAL
Irr.Area (ha) 78,969 297,579 334,967 118,665 98,375 82,963 44,086 78,903 47,014 59,507 82,701 97,386 1,421,115
Irr.Area (km2) 790 2,976 3,350 1,187 984 830 441 789 470 595 827 974 14,211
Total Area (km^2) 12,717 38,290 27,131 44,034 17,821 20,733 13,606 20,768 20,395 23,395 26,486 30,461 295,836
% of Irr.Area 6.21% 7.77% 12.35% 2.69% 5.52% 4.00% 3.24% 3.80% 2.31% 2.54% 3.12% 3.20% 4.80%
There are 6 major large-scale dams in Philippines with dam height of more than 100 m, namely
Ambuklao Dam, Binga Dam, San Roque Dam, Angat Dam, Magat Dam, and Pantabangan Dam
(see Table below).
*1: Pre-feasibility study of rehabilitation and improvement of existing dams in Philippines (METI, 2018)
*2: https://bob.nia.gov.ph
[Abbreviation] WS: water supply, IR: irrigation, HP: hydropower, FC: flood control
The commissioning of the Angat Reservoir was in 1968 for the purpose of urban water supply,
irrigation, hydropower generation, and flood control. The catchment area upstream from the
reservoir is 546 km2. The trans-basin diversion from the Umiray River was commissioned in
2000. The catchment area of the water diversion facility on the Umiray River is 130 km2 (see
Figure below).
There are two routes for the outflow from the Angat Reservoir as shown in Figure below. One
route is the outflow discharged for the main hydropower station (200 MW). After hydropower
generation, the water outgoing from the main hydropower station goes through the main
diversion tunnel which flows into the Angat River and is caught at the Bustos Dam for AMRIS.
Another route consists of discharges used for the auxiliary hydropower station (46 MW). It is
then released through the low-level outlet and spilled out during flood. All outflow discharges
go down toward the Ipo Dam that has a gross storage capacity of 7.5 MCM. A major part of the
outflows received by the Ipo Dam is transferred to MWSS.
The Umiray-Angat transbasin diversion is to be augmented with the construction of the Sumag
River intake. The Sumag River intake aims at supplying an additional of 2.17 m3/sec (= 188
MLD) for MWSS. The expected projection completion date is July 2023.
Figure D-11 Existing Dams and Diversions Figure D-12 Outflows from Angat Reservoir
in Angat River Basin
Source: The Study on Integrated Water Resources Management for Poverty Alleviation and Economic Development in the
Pampanga River Basin (JICA, 2011)
There are 2 existing membrane-based water treatment plant (WTP) to draw raw water from Lake
Laguna, of which water is brackish. Putatan WTP 1 was constructed in 2009 with capacity of
100 MLD and operational from 2010. It is the first case in the country to use large-scale
microfiltration and reverse osmosis. Putatan WTP 2 is also a membrane-based water treatment
plant and has a design capacity of 150 MLD. It was inaugurated in 2019.
Large-Scale Reservoir
The development plan of large-scale reservoir for major river basins was studied in “Master
Plan Study on Water Resources Management in the Republic of Philippines” (1998 M/P) by
JICA in 1998.
In Philippines, many dam sites have been identified so far as listed in the “Survey/Inventory on
Water Impounding Reservoirs”, which was compiled by the National Water Resources Council
(original organization of NWRB) in April 1978. The total number of the dams listed in the
inventory amounts to 864. Dams at not more than 30m in dam height or at not more than 30 km2
in catchment area were categorized as large-scale dams. A total of 364 dams were entitled to be
large-scale dams in the entire Philippines.
A total of 73 dams were adopted as the candidates for water resources development schemes,
and 22 projects were proposed (see Table below). Considering water deficit, 4 WRR, namely
WRR II, WRR III, WRR IV, and WRR VII were prioritized. The selected priority projects for
major river basins are: i) Mallig-II Multi-Purpose Dam Project, ii) Matuno Multi-Purpose Dam
Project, iii) Addalam-A Hydroelectric Project, iv) Ilaguen-B Hydroelectric Project, v) Agulubu
Hydroelectric Project, vi) Balog-Balog Multi-Purpose Dam Project, vii) Balintingon Multi-
Purpose Dam Project, viii) Bayabas and Maasim Dam Project, and ix) Amnay Multi-Purpose
Dam Project.
Table D-9 List of Proposed Impounding Dam Projects for Major River Basins
No. River Basin Name WRR Name of Projects Priprity Project Status
1 Laoag WRR I Palsiguan-Nueva Multi-Purpose Dam Project (NIA) Construction on-going (NIA)
2 Laoag WRR I Tina-Gasgas-Cura Multi-Purpose Dam Project (DPWH) No data
3 Abra WRR I Binongan Multi-Purpose Dam Project (NPC) No data
4 Cagayan WRR II Mallig II Multi-Purpose Dam Project Selected No data
5 Cagayan WRR II Matuno Multi-Purpose Dam Project (NIA) Selected Site conflict
6 Cagayan WRR II Addalam A Hydroelectric Project (NPC) Selected Site conflict
7 Cagayan WRR II Ilaguen B Hydroelectric Project (NPC) Selected Site conflict
8 Abulug WRR II Agulubu Hydroelectric Project (NPC) Selected No data
9 Agno WRR III Balog-Balog Multi-Purpose Dam Project (NIA) Selected Construction on-going (NIA)
10 Pampanga WRR III Balintingon Multi-Purpose Dam Project (NIA) Selected Planned as irrigation dam (NIA)
11 Pampanga WRR III Bayabas and Maasim Dam Project (NIA) Selected Construction on-going (NIA)
12 Amnay-Patric WRR IV Amnay Multi-Purpose Dam Project Selected No data
13 Bicol WRR V Talisay Multi-Purpose Dam Project No data
14 Panay WRR VI Panay Multi-Purpose Dam Project (MPWH) Planned as irrigation dam (NIA)
15 Jalaur WRR VI Jalaur Multi-Purpose Dam Project (NPC) Construction on-going as irrigation dam (NIA)
16 Ilog-Hilabangan WRR VI Ilog No.1 Multi-Purpose Dam Project (DPWH) No data
17 Tagoloan WRR X Tagoloan Multi-Purpose Dam Project No data
18 Cagayan de Oro WRR X Bulag-Batang Hydroelectric Project (NPC) Planned (IPP)
19 Tagum-Libuganon WRR XI Buhonao Multi-Purpose Dam Project No data
20 Davao WRR XI Davao II Multi-Purpose Dam Project No data
21 Buayan Malungun WRR XI Dimloc Multi-Purpose Dam Project No data
22 Mindanao WRR XII Pulangi Multi-Purpose Dam Project (NPC) Construction on-going (IPP)
The progress of proposed projects was surveyed and shown in Appendix. The major updates
are:
- 5. Matuno Multi-Purpose Dam Project (NIA): There are 4 hydropower plant developed
by IPPs around the proposed dam site. The development of Matuno Multi-Purpose
Dam Project might not be possible.
- 10. Balintingon Multi-Purpose Dam Project (NIA): In 2010 the EO of the president
was issued. Nueva Ecija Province is the implementing agency. In the M/P, it was
proposed as a multi-purpose dam, but planned as an irrigation dam. However, there is
possibility to add the aim of water supply due to the urgency of water supply to the
Metro Manila in the future.
- 11. Bayabas and Maasim Dam Project (NIA): The project is on-going. “Bayabas Small
Reservoir Irrigation Project (Bayabas SRIP)” is being implemented by NIA. The
public scoping of Bayabas SRIP was held in 2018. Pre-F/S of Maasim Dam Project
was completed.
- 14. Panay Multi-Purpose Dam Project (MPWH): The purpose of dam was changed to
irrigation. “Panay River Basin Integrated Development Project (PRBIDP)” was
planned by NIA. The environmental impact statement was published in 2017.
- 15. Jalaur Multi-Purpose Dam Project (NPC): The purpose of dam was changed to
irrigation. “Jalaur River Multi-Purpose Project Stage II (JRMP II)” is being
implemented by NIA.
There is progress on implementation of dams under NIA. Most of hydroelectric projects and
some other sites are developed by IPPs. Most of IPPs’ hydroelectric projects seems to be run-
off-river type, which have no or little water storage function.
Water Supply System for Urban Water Use including Inter-Basin Diversion System
The development plan of water supply system for urban area was studied in “Master Plan Study
on Water Resources Management in the Republic of Philippines” (1998 M/P) by JICA in 1998.
A total of 17 projects were proposed as candidate projects for water supply of 9 urbanized area,
and 7 projects were prioritized (see Table below).
Table D-10 List of Proposed Water Supply Projects for 9 Urbanized Areas
No. Major City Project Name Priprity Project Status
1 Metro Manila (i) Development of Laguna Lake Operational (Maynilad /Manila Water)
2 Metro Manila (ii) MWSP III (Laiban dam) Canceled
Construction on-going (Maynilad
3 Metro Manila (iii) Kanan-Umiray transbasin Selected /Manila Water)
4 Metro Manila (iv) Bayabas dam and Massim dam Selected Construction on-going (NIA)
5 Metro Manila (v) Kaliwa-Cogco water supply Selected Construction on-going (MWSS)
6 Metro Manila (vi) Pampanga water conveyance No data
7 Metro Cebu (i) Mananga II dam Planned
8 Metro Cebu (ii) Malubog-Mananga transbasin Selected No data
9 Metro Cebu (iii) Lusam-Pulanbato transbasin Selected No data
10 Metro Cebu (iv) Bohol-Cebu water supply Selected No data
11 Baguio City (i) BOT Scheme (Bulk water supply) Construction on-going
12 Baguio City (ii) Rehabilitation of existing facilites No data
13 Baguio City (iii) Laboy dam Selected No data
14 Baguio City (iv) Laboy weir and ponds No data
BOT Scheme (The Davao II multi-purpose dam is
Construction on-going
15 Davao City proposed as an alternative of the BOT Scheme.)
16 Angeles City Not necessary -
17 Iloilo City Not necessary -
Not necessary (The Bago multi-purpose dam is
proposed as an alternative of the groundwater
18 Bacolod City development.) -
19 Cagayan de Oro City BOT Scheme (Bulonog-Batang dam) Planned
20 Zamboanga City Pasonaca dam Canceled
- 3. Metro Manila, Kanan-Umiray Transbasin: The diversion from Smag River is being
constructed. “Kanan River /Agos River Phase 1a” and “Kanan /Agos River Phase 1b”
are planned.
- 4. Metro Manila, Bayabas Dam and Massim Dam: The project is on-going. “Bayabas
Small Reservoir Irrigation Project (Bayabas SRIP)” is being implemented by NIA.
The public scoping of Bayabas SRIP was held in 2018.Pre-F/S of Maasim Dam Project
was completed.
- 11. Baguio City, BOT scheme (Bulk water supply): Badiwan Mini-Bulk Water Project
is under construction.
- 15. Davao City, BOT scheme: Davao City Bulk Water Supply Project (DCBWSP) is
on-going.
- 20. Zamboanga City, Pasonaca Dam: Pasonaca Dam was canceled. Bulk Water Supply
(Pamucutan River) was newly proposed, and it is presently operational.
Most of the new water resources developments for major cities are bulk water supply under PPP
scheme.
As mentioned above, the observed river discharge data is often missing, and the reliability of high-water
discharge is particularly low. There is likewise no long-term discharge data for all WRRs. For this reason,
a rainfall-runoff model (Tank Model) was constructed using observed discharge for a reliable period
(annual runoff rate is from about 0.2 to 0.75), and a long-term (1979 to 2020) period of 42 years. It was
decided to create long-term discharge data for each WRR.
In addition, in calculating the groundwater potential, only about 20 observational data were obtained, in
which the observed groundwater level data was unevenly distributed in the region for a short period
from around 2019. Therefore, it was decided to build a groundwater flow model using Darcy's Law and
estimate the groundwater potential of each WRR.
A hydrological analysis model is also needed to assess future climate change impacts.
Based on the basic data acquired, a hydrological model was constructed and the water resource potentials
(surface water and groundwater) in each water resource region were calculated. Figure D-14 shows the
workflow of the hydrological analysis.
Stage-(1) (National Level) Stage-(2) (Priority Water Resource Zone)
Groundwater Long-Term
Groundwater
Figure D-14 Work Flow and Inputs and Outputs of Hydrological Analysis
The purpose of the Stage I national level hydrological analysis is to compare the balance of water
resources by water resource region/basin-wide scale unit. The following method was adopted to
rationalize the work from the viewpoint of accuracy and work time.
Source (1): The Republic of Indonesia, the project for assessing and integrating climate change impacts
into the water resource management plans for Brantas and Musi River Basins: Water Resources
Management Plan: Final Report, JICA, Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. : CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. :
The University of Tokyo 2019.12
Source (2): Data Collection Survey on Water Resources Management in Central Highlands Final Report,
JICA, Nippon Koei, Co., Ltd. 2018.4
Concept of Groundwater Potential (Available
Groundwater Amount)
Surface Analysis Model (Tank Model)
Figure D-15 Concept of Surface Analysis Model (Tank Model) and Groundwater Potential
Due to the limited availability of in-situ data under the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)
crisis, the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Survey team has decided to utilize
re-analysis and satellite data for daily rainfall data which is to be used for the hydrological
analyses. Three datasets: ERA5, GSMaP and CHIRPS, are proposed as the options. The first
option: ERA5, is a global re-analysis dataset that provides hourly estimates of atmospheric, land
and oceanic climate variables by conducting numerical forecasting system analyses, using
observed data as the input data. The second option: Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation
(GSMaP), is a precipitation dataset that provides hourly estimates of precipitation by integrating
data obtained from multiple microwave radiometers and from thermal infrared bands of
geostationary meteorological satellite. Among multiple versions of GSMaP datasets,
“v6_gauge_rev” is adopted as the option as this version includes precipitation correction by
ground rain gauges. The third option: Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with
Station data (CHIRPS), is a quasi-global rainfall dataset that incorporates precipitation
estimation from the thermal infrared bands of geostationary satellites and rain gauge data to
correct it.
Target period of the hydrological analyses is from January 1st, 1979 to December 31st, 2020. As
in Figure D-16, ERA5 is the only dataset of the three that can cover the whole target period by
itself, followed by CHIRPS, which is available from 1981 to present. GSMaP, on the other hand,
has by far the shortest history out of the three and is available from March 2001 to present,
which can cover less than half of the target period. As is clear from Figure below, it is
automatically determined that ERA5 is used for 1979 and 1980 since there is no other choice.
Spatial/Temporal Resolution
As is already stated in Table below, CHIRPS is the dataset with the highest spatial resolution
(0.05°) of the three datasets, followed by GSMaP (0.1°) and ERA5 (0.25°). Temporal resolution
is conformed to be one day to coordinate with the temporal resolution of the hydrological
analyses. This means that temporal upscaling is required in case of using ERA5 and GSMaP.
Data quality of ERA5, GSMaP and CHIRPS is evaluated by comparing the monthly rainfall to
that of in-situ rainfall data at 14 stations provided by the Philippine Atmospheric Geophysical
and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA). Monthly rainfall of ERA5, GSMaP and
CHIRPS are compared to that of PAGASA in scatter diagrams. A scatter diagram with
approximate expression at Clark Station in Pampanga is shown as an example in Figure below.
For the scatter diagrams of the rest stations. The slope of the approximate expression and
correlation coefficient at all the 14 stations is summarized in Table below. As is clear from the
table, GSMaP shows the best correlation with PAGASA’s data, followed by CHIRPS. ERA5
represents the least correlation with PAGASA.
Table D-12 Quality Evaluation of ERA5, GSMaP and CHIRPS in Comparison to Monthly In-situ
Rainfall Data Provided by PAGASA
Approximate Expression of a Scatter Plot Correlation with PAGASA Data
ERA5/PAGASA GSMaP/PAGASA CHIRPS/PAGASA ERA5 GSMaP CHIRPS
Province PAGASA Sta. Name Slope of an Approximate Expression Correl. Coef.: R
Pampanga Clark 0.75 1.10 1.34 0.87 0.96 0.92
Maguindanao Cotabato 0.90 0.82 0.83 0.57 0.91 0.76
Davao_del_Sur Davao City 0.80 1.04 1.09 0.45 0.91 0.58
Misamis_Oriental Lumbia 1.00 1.06 0.95 0.54 0.90 0.74
Sorsogon Juban 0.46 0.80 0.73 0.56 0.93 0.89
Ilocos_Norte Laoag 0.82 1.00 0.84 0.89 0.93 0.98
Cebu Mactan 0.94 1.06 0.88 0.65 0.75 0.80
Metropolitan_Manila Port Area 0.61 0.92 0.95 0.86 0.94 0.95
Palawan Puerto Princesa 1.15 1.03 0.90 0.77 0.83 0.97
Capiz Roxas City 1.10 0.91 0.95 0.60 0.94 0.78
Occidental_Mindoro San Jose 0.95 1.07 1.23 0.90 0.93 0.90
Leyte Tacloban 0.63 1.12 1.02 0.70 0.93 0.89
Cagayan Tuguegarao 0.99 1.01 1.05 0.71 0.94 0.79
Zamboanga_del_Sur Zamboanga 1.28 1.24 0.86 0.66 0.89 0.87
Mean Slope Average= 0.88 1.01 0.97 0.69 0.91 0.84
Spatial Distribution
Iso-hyetal maps of the mean annual rainfall of ERA5, GSMaP and CHIRPS are compared to the
iso-hyetal map cited from the previous project: “Master Plan Study on Water Resources
Management in the Republic of the Philippines” (hereinafter referred to as “the 1998 Master
Plan”). For the contour map and iso-hyetal maps of CHIRPS and GSMaP. Since the iso-hyetal
map of the 1998 Master Plan is based on the in-situ rainfall observed from 1961 to 1995, the
maps of ERA5, CHIRPS and GSMaP are created based on rainfall data from a similar period as
possible. It should be noted that ERA5, CHIRPS and GSMaP data are available from 1979, 1981
and March 2000, respectively, and that there are no data available before that.
The iso-hyetal line of ERA5 represents good topographical dependency. In other words, rainfall
is closely correlated with the elevation. CHIRPS, as in Figure below, also shows good
topographical dependency; rainfall amount increases as the elevation goes up. In GSMaP, as in
Figure below, the iso-hyetal line looks sparse and shows less topographical dependency
compared to ERA5 and CHIRPS. This can be explained by resolution of the rain gauge that is
used in GSMaP for correcting rainfall amount; the rain gauge’s spatial/temporal resolution is 50
km/day, which is not enough to fully represent local precipitation such as squalls. This could
have led to underestimation of rainfall in mountainous areas and hence the iso-hyetal map of
GSMaP shows least topographical dependency of the three datasets.
Table D-13 Details of Four Iso-hyetal Maps
1998 Master Plan ERA5 CHIRPS GSMaP
Period from 1961 to from 1979 to from 1981 to from 2001 to
1995 1995 1995 2020
Data type Mean annual rainfall
Source: JICA Survey Team
Contour map The 1998 Master Plan (from 1961 to 1995) ERA5 (from 1979 to 1995)
Figure D-18 Contour Map of the Philippines and Iso-hyetal Maps (1998 Master Plan and ERA5)
Contour map The 1998 Master Plan (from 1961 to 1995) CHIRPS (from 1981 to 1995)
Figure D-19 Contour Map of the Philippines and Iso-hyetal Maps (1998 Master Plan and CHIRPS)
Contour map The 1998 Master Plan (from 1961 to 1995) GSMaP (from 2001 to 2020)
Figure D-20 Contour Map of the Philippines and Iso-hyetal Maps (1998 Master Plan and GSMaP)
(1) Conclusion
As in table below, CHIRPS is considered as the most suitable dataset for the survey. Therefore,
ERA5 is used for the first two years (1979 and 1980) of the analysis period (1979 to 2020), as
explained above, and CHIRPS is adopted for the rest: 1981 to 2020.
Table D-14 Evaluation of Re-analysis and Satellite Data
ERA5 GSMaP CHIRPS
Availability Good Poor Good
Resolution Poor Fair Good
Correlation Poor Good Fair
Spatial Distribution Fair Poor Fair
Overall Fair Fair Good
Source: JICA Survey Team
The preparation of the Tank Model is carried out to complete the missing data period and to
conduct climate change simulation. The basic component of the Tank Model (Sugawara, 1967)
is a simple tank with holes to pass the water content.
The outflow from each hole is proportionate to the height between the hole and water surface.
Provided that a tank is accommodated with one bottom hole and two side holes, the rule for
outflow computation is as follows:
yn = 0 (Xn ≤ h1)
yn = 1(Xn - h1) (h1 < Xn ≤ h2)
yn = 2(Xn - h2) + 1(Xn - h1) (h2 < Xn),
zn = Xn,
Xn' = Xn - yn - zn,
Zn+1 = Xn' + xn + 1
where, Xn : water depth of stage n,
yn : outflow from side holes of stage n,
zn : outflow from bottom hole of stage n,
xn : inflow of stage n,
1, 2 : coefficient of side holes, and
: coefficient of bottom hole.
Normally, a Tank Model combines several tanks in a series to make a better simulation result.
The Tank Model, consisting of tanks in a series, successfully analyzes a number of river basins
in the Philippines. In such models, each tank interacts in the manner described in the above
equation. The top tank receives the rainfall as inflow to the tank, while the tanks below get the
supply from the bottom holes of the tank directory above. The aggregated outflow from all the
side holes of the tanks constitutes the inflow into the river course.
The Tank Model is a conceptual representation of hydrological processes in the unit area of the
basin, and it simulates wetness of several soil layers using tanks arranged vertically in a series.
This kind of model typically consists of three or four storage tanks. Precipitation is the input of
the model, and it enters into the top tank. Some of the accumulated water flows through the side
outlet of a tank and some of it infiltrates down into the second lower tank. The process repeats
for every lower tank. Evapotranspiration is incorporated via subtraction from the tank. The
runoff from the side outlet of a storage tank (q) is proportional to the water head over that outlet,
and the infiltration (p) is proportional to the water depth. These relations can be expressed as:
q = a(h – z), p = bh
where h is the tank depth, z is the height of the discharge outlet from the base of each tank, a is
the runoff coefficient and b is the infiltration coefficient.
In this study, the Tank Model is applied with four storage tanks consisting of a surface tank, an
intermediate tank, and a base tank. The two side outflows from the surface tank are regarded as
the surface runoff and the sub-surface runoff, the side outflow from the intermediate tank is
regarded as the intermediate runoff and the outflow from the third tank is regarded as the base
runoff. The total outflow from the side outlet (Q) from each tank is regarded as the accumulation
of the outflows from a system in the watershed, as given by the following equation:
Q/A = q11 + q12 + q2 + q3+ q4
where A is the watershed area.
The outflow (seepage) parameter from the bottom tank (4th Tank) of the Tank Model was set by
calibration of the observed and calculated river discharges and the groundwater level fluctuation
of the groundwater model.
Paddy Model
The irrigated area of paddy fields is vast in the Philippines, and the function of paddy fields
cannot be ignored in runoff analysis. Paddy irrigation has a special water cycle mechanism, with
abundant water supply (entered as rainfall) on the surface soil of the paddy, and overflow and
infiltration from the paddy must also be considered. Paddy fields can be thought of as a kind of
vast artificial infiltration pond. Therefore, in this survey, the paddy field model was incorporated
into the normal Tank Model and analyzed. Figure below shows a conceptual diagram of a Tank
Model considering a paddy field Tank Model.
Initial Storage
12.68 0.05 h=20 mm Paddy
Initial Storage
28.60 0.2 h=30 mm
0.1
Initial Storage
18.80 0.05 h=30 mm
0.15
Initial Storage
320 0.005 h=150 mm
0.0025
Figure D-21 Conceptual Diagram of Tank Model Considering the Paddy Field Tank
The height of the paddy field (overflow height) was assumed to be 50 mm, and the infiltration
amount from the paddy field was assumed at 2 mm/day. The potential evapotranspiration from
paddy fields during the irrigation period was the value of ETo by FAO-Penman-Monteith, and
the potential evapotranspiration outside the irrigation period was the value of the Hamon
equation. The irrigation area was given the area every ten days for each of the dry season and
the rainy season, and the amount of irrigation water was given the amount of ten-days irrigation
water requirement.
For details on how to calculate the amount of irrigation water requirement, refer to the next
section. In the calibration of the Tank Model, the diversion water requirement considering the
waterway loss was subtracted from the rivers in each sub-basin to the irrigation requirement
(ten-day average water volume) by province, and the water volume was supplied to the paddy
fields as rainfall. The loss of the irrigation canal was also supplied as rainfall to the land other
than the paddy field. Diversion water requirement was calculated by using the irrigation water
requirement and assumed irrigation efficiency at 54% as follows:
(B) Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
No. of Days 10 10 11 10 10 8 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 11 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 11
(Based on Cropping Pattern) 10 10 11 10 10 8 10 10 4 0 0 0 0 7 11 10 10 10 10 10 11 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 2 10 10 10 10 10 11
(C) Potential Evapotranspiration mm/day 5.20 6.21 6.44 7.80 6.95 5.40 4.84 4.28 4.75 4.62 4.88 4.71
or Pan Evaporation
(D) Area Factor
Land Soaking Stage (Als) 0.054 0.156 0.156 0.156 0.156 0.018 0.054 0.156 0.156 0.156 0.156 0.018
Land Preparation Stage (Alp) 0.111 0.333 0.444 0.444 0.408 0.200 0.018 0.111 0.333 0.444 0.444 0.408 0.200 0.018
Crop Growing Stage (Acg) 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.844 0.667 0.433 0.200 0.018 0.111 0.333 0.567 0.800 0.982 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.844 0.667 0.433 0.200 0.018 0.111 0.333 0.578 0.800 0.982
(E) Crop Coefficient (Kc) 0.87 0.92 0.96 1.00 1.03 1.10 1.14 1.16 1.15 1.11 1.08 1.05 1.00 0.94
1.10 1.14 1.16 1.15 1.11 1.08 1.05 1.00 0.94 0.87 0.92 0.96 1.00 1.03
(F) Crop Water Requirement (CWR) mm/day
Land Soaking Stage (Wet) (LS) 165 31.69 21.43 30.32 30.32 30.32 29.83 26.78 26.78 27.01 27.01 27.01 26.86
(Dry) 145
Land Preparation Stage (LP) 8.12 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.26 6.26 6.26 6.07 6.29 6.29 6.29 6.14 6.14 6.14
Crop Growing Stage (CG) 5.72 5.93 6.03 7.14 6.89 6.71 6.76 6.44 6.05 4.70 4.97 4.65 4.84 4.99 4.71 4.88 4.96 5.46 5.27 5.13 4.85 4.62 4.34 4.25 4.49 4.52 4.71 4.85
Percolation (P) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Total (CWR) 7.72 7.93 8.03 9.14 7.51 5.81 3.79 1.69 0.14 1.71 4.24 6.98 8.47 10.05 6.86 6.72 6.97 6.71 6.88 6.96 7.46 6.14 4.76 2.97 2.77 4.97 6.31 7.70 9.17 6.76 6.60 6.84
10-kdays CWR mm/10day 77.20 79.28 88.35 91.42 75.06 46.46 37.94 16.88 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.98 46.69 69.78 84.70 100.47 68.60 67.24 76.69 67.08 68.79 76.61 74.63 61.38 47.56 29.66 27.70 9.93 63.08 77.00 91.67 67.58 65.96 75.22 1,943
(G) Rainfall mm/10day 1 5 3 2 2 22 3 11 16 11 4 23 15 61 49 35 199 133 59 89 169 93 158 83 72 163 223 36 144 9 44 11 21 34 38 11 2,052
Effective Rainfall (ER) 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 43 34 25 80 53 41 62 68 65 63 58 50 65 45 25 58 0 31 0 15 24 27 0 962
(H) Irrigation Water Requirement (IWR) mm/day 7.72 7.93 8.03 9.14 7.51 3.88 3.79 1.69 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 4.53 0.51 4.73 2.73 0.49 0.83 0.20 0.56 1.68 2.42 0.00 0.30 0.45 0.00 4.97 3.23 7.70 7.70 4.38 3.94 6.84
Irrigation Water Requirement (IWR) mm/10day 77.20 79.28 88.35 91.42 75.06 31.06 37.94 16.88 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.39 45.28 5.10 47.27 27.30 4.94 9.09 1.98 5.59 18.51 24.23 0.00 2.96 4.46 0.00 9.93 32.28 77.00 76.97 43.78 39.36 75.22 1,061
(I) Irrigation Efficiency (IE) 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54
(J) Diversion Water Requirement (DWR) mm/day 14.30 14.68 14.87 16.93 13.90 7.19 7.03 3.13 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.35 9.43 1.06 9.85 5.69 1.03 1.72 0.41 1.17 3.51 5.05 0.00 0.62 0.93 0.00 9.20 5.98 14.26 14.25 8.11 7.29 12.66
lit/sec/ha
(A) Cropping Pattern NIA (RIO/PIO) shall submit the typical cropping pattern(s) adopted for the calculation of annual IWR.
(C) Potential Evapotranspiration NIA (RIO/PIO) shall submit the standard value adopted for the calculation of annual IWR.
JICA Study Team (JST) will also estimate evapotranspiration based on climate data. Submitted data and estimated values will be compared and final values for IWR calculation will be determined by JST.
(E) Crop Coefficient NIA (RIO/PIO) shall submit this data adopted for the calculation of the annual IWR, or adopt the following efficient.
Growing Stage (%) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Crop Coefficient 0.80 0.83 0.93 1.04 1.12 1.20 1.21 1.15 1.01 0.85
(F) Land Soaking NIA (RIO/PIO) shall submit this value adopted for the calculation of annual IWR. (For, example: Soil Saturation Requirement: 150mm for Wet Season, 100mm for Dry season)
Land Preparation NIA (RIO/PIO) shall submit this value adopted for the calculation of annual IWR. (For example: Depth of Ponding: 25mm, Duration=21days)
Percolation NIA (RIO/PIO) shall submit this value adopted for the calculation of annual IWR. (For examle: 1.5 - 3.0 mm/day)
(G) Effective Rainfall JST will collect the daily rainfall data in nationwide, and provide the concerned experts.
Daily water balance method assuming 50mm hight of paddy dike.
The 10-day rainfall in each month with the basic drough year of 5-year return period will be estimated.
(I) Irrigation Efficiency NIA (RIO/PIO) shall submit this value adopted for the calculation of annual IWR, or adopt the following efficiencies
(%)
Component Plan Actual
Wet Dry Wet Dry
On-farm Efficiency 75 80 75 80
Conveyance Efficiency 80 80 80 80
Operation Efficiency 80 85 50 80
Overall 48 54 30 51
(CWR)=(LS)x(Als)+(LP)x(Alp)+{(CG)+(P)}x(Acg)
In the calibration of the Tank Model, the irrigation requirement was calculated by changing the
irrigation area by province (ten-day average area by rainy season and dry season) for each year
from 1979 to 2020.
For details on the calculation method of domestic, industrial and other water demand, refer to
the next section. In the calibration of the Tank Model, the required water volume for each year
from 1979 to 2020 for domestic, industrial and other water demand was calculated for each
province, and the required water volume for each province is multiplied by the area ratio of each
sub-basin. The required amount of the domestic, industrial and other water demand was
subtracted from the rivers in each sub-basin. In this survey, it was assumed that 60% of the water
returned to the rivers as return flow by sewage, etc.
Evapotranspiration
Infiltration
Infiltration from each tank in the Tank Model is simply calculated by multiplying the amount of
storage in each tank by the infiltration rate multiplier. In the Stage-II survey, the infiltration
amount will be calculated by performing "saturated-unsaturated infiltration analysis" using a
physical model in the selected priority area.
Return Flow
In this survey, it was assumed that 60% of the intake of domestic, industrial, and other water
demand is returned to the river as return flow by sewage, etc.
Maintenance Flow
During the dry season, all the demand for irrigation and urban water cannot be taken from rivers.
In such a case, if all the required amount of water is taken from the river, the river flow becomes
zero (0). Therefore, in this survey, it was assumed that 60% of the river flow in the dry season
would be used as the maintenance flow to the downstream, and that the remaining 40% could
be taken from river.
There are many dams in the Philippines, in this survey however, the following four large-scale
dams with irrigation purposes included were considered in the Tank Model calibration and
future prediction simulation.
Figure below shows the results of reservoir operation simulation at Magat Dam. The results of
simulated reservoir water level and operation rule curve are well fitted.
600 175
500 165
400 155
300
145
200
100 135
0 125
1983-Jan
1983-Jul
1984-Jan
1984-Jul
1985-Jan
1985-Jul
1986-Jan
1986-Jul
1987-Jan
1987-Jul
1988-Jan
1988-Jul
1989-Jan
1989-Jul
1990-Jan
1990-Jul
1991-Jan
1991-Jul
1992-Jan
1992-Jul
1993-Jan
1993-Jul
1994-Jan
1994-Jul
1995-Jan
1995-Jul
1996-Jan
1996-Jul
Obs.Inflow (m3/s) Obs.Total Outflow Calc. Total Outflow Obs.Res.WL (El.m) Calc. Res.WL (El.m) Operation Rule Curve (El.m)
600 175
500 165
400 155
300
145
200
100 135
0 125
1997-Jan
1997-Jul
1998-Jan
1998-Jul
1999-Jan
1999-Jul
2000-Jan
2000-Jul
2001-Jan
2001-Jul
2002-Jan
2002-Jul
2003-Jan
2003-Jul
2004-Jan
2004-Jul
2005-Jan
2005-Jul
2006-Jan
2006-Jul
2007-Jan
2007-Jul
2008-Jan
2008-Jul
2009-Jan
2009-Jul
2010-Jan
2010-Jul
Obs.Inflow (m3/s) Obs.Total Outflow Calc. Total Outflow Obs.Res.WL (El.m) Calc. Res.WL (El.m) Operation Rule Curve (El.m)
600 175
500 165
400 155
300
145
200
100 135
0 125
2011-Jan
2011-Jul
2012-Jan
2012-Jul
2013-Jan
2013-Jul
2014-Jan
2014-Jul
2015-Jan
2015-Jul
2016-Jan
2016-Jul
2017-Jan
2017-Jul
2018-Jan
2018-Jul
2019-Jan
2019-Jul
2020-Jan
2020-Jul
Obs.Inflow (m3/s) Obs.Total Outflow Calc. Total Outflow Obs.Res.WL (El.m) Calc. Res.WL (El.m) Operation Rule Curve (El.m)
Figure below shows the results of reservoir operation simulation at San Roque Dam. The results
of simulated reservoir water level and operation rule curve are well fitted.
300 290
280
200 260
250
150
240
100 230
220
50
210
0 200
2003/1/1
2004/1/1
2005/1/1
2006/1/1
2007/1/1
2008/1/1
2009/1/1
2010/1/1
2011/1/1
2012/1/1
Obs.Inflow Obs.Total Outflow Simulated Total Outflow Obs.RWL (El.m) Simulated RWL (El.m) Operation Rule Curve
Figure D-23 Observed and Simulated Reservoir Operation at San Roque Dam
Figure below shows the results of reservoir operation simulation at Angat Dam. The results of
simulated reservoir water level and operation rule curve are well fitted. The observed outflow
and simulated outflow are also fitted.
200 220
140 200
120
190
100
180
80
60 170
40
160
20
0 150
2010/May
2011/May
2012/May
2010/Apr
2010/Jun
2011/Apr
2010/Jul
2010/Aug
2010/Nov
2011/Jun
2012/Apr
2011/Jul
2011/Aug
2011/Nov
2012/Jun
2012/Jul
2012/Aug
2012/Nov
2010/Mar
2010/Sep
2011/Feb
2011/Mar
2011/Sep
2012/Feb
2012/Mar
2012/Sep
2010/Oct
2010/Dec
2011/Jan
2011/Oct
2011/Dec
2012/Jan
2012/Oct
2012/Dec
Obs.Total Inflow Obs.Total Outflow Simulated Total Outflow Obs.Res.WL (Elm) Simulatd Res.WL (El.m) Operation Rule Curve
Figure below shows the results of reservoir operation simulation at Pantabangan Dam. The
results of simulated reservoir water level and operation rule curve are well fitted. The observed
outflow and simulated outflow are also fitted.
300 210
250
200 200
150 190
100
180
50
0 170
2019/Nov
2019/Apr
2019/Jun
2019/Jul
2019/Aug
2020/Apr
2020/Jun
2020/Jul
2020/Aug
2020/Nov
2019/Feb
2019/Mar
2019/May
2019/Sep
2020/Feb
2020/Mar
2020/May
2020/Sep
2019/Jan
2019/Oct
2019/Dec
2020/Jan
2020/Oct
2020/Dec
Obs.Inflow Obs.Outflow Simulated Outflow
Obs.Res.WL (El.m) Simulated Res.WL.(El.m) Operation Rule Curve (ORC) (El.m)
The observed discharge of each observation station was used as the verification discharge for the
calibration of the Tank Model parameters of each sus-basin based on the catchment area ratio. First, the
accuracy of the observed discharge was evaluated by the runoff coefficient and the flow duration curve.
Unfortunately, many of the observed discharges had a runoff coefficient of more than 1 (larger than
precipitation), and there were many points where the flow duration curve (FDC) due to the specific
discharge was questionable. Therefore, in this survey, it was decided to use only the observed runoff
coefficient in the year when the coefficient is 0.25 to 0.7 as the verification discharge for the Tank Model
calibration.
There are many observatories where the annual runoff rate exceeds 1.0 and the runoff is larger
than the amount of precipitation. The cells colored in yellow in the Table in ANNEX-Hydrology
indicate the years when the runoff coefficient exceeds 1.0.
The Figure below shows an example of the FDC of the observed discharge. The discharges of
some stations were questionable in reliability.
Flow Duration Curve in/around WRR-I, Abra River Basin Flow Duration Curve in/around WRR-II, Abulog River Basin
100 40
6.Abulog (CA=2558 km2) Nagan
90 Strange FDC
35 Nagan
80 5.Gasgas (CA=78 km2) Nagan
30 Abra
Specific Discharge (m^3/s/100km^2)
Specific Discharge (m^3/s/100km^2)
30
2.Pudtol (CA=101 km2)
10 9.Nassiping (A=21,610 km2)
20
5
10
0 0
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%
Duration (%) Duration (%)
Source: JICA Survey Team based on observed discharge data of DPWH, etc.
Figure D-26 Example of Flow Duration Curves (FDC) of Specific Discharge (m3/sec/km2)
Each WRR or river basin was divided into several small sub-basins as follows:
0 206.7 809.3
1 564.7 895.8
4 158.1 505.2
8 123.2 504.3
10 487.5 883.5
14 380.2 177.4
15 410.5 607.6
24 427.9 844.1
51 377.1 157.4
62 1,594.10 72.4
91 165.3 291.5
33 67
234
Elevation 532
Polygon Id Area (km2)
(m)
21 441.8 63.7 187
36 313.0 367
89 351.8 400 272
81 464 44
109 81
44 908 38 25
38 652 10
25 278 15 44
123
22 37 144
19 552 284
38
16 451 785
15 1274 1283
315 547.93
C01
339 263.22 C02
362 344.90 C
0
373 362.98 3
C02 C C
381 473.32 0 0
4 5
397 492.18
387 380.80
C
C03 401 159.09 0 C C
8 0 0
415 311.17 6 7
331 254.21
C09
341 259.77
C04
1877 215.81 C C
C11 1 1
376 691.99 0 2
C05
C08 2376 1410.93
C09
C06 421 215.58
C07 2036 468.79
436 188.30
C10 446 108.83
2255 155.61
1742 191.39
435 257.99
C11
427 317.42
1843 173.83
C12 1965 700.30
Mindoro
Palawan
1169 1143
1172 1125
1036 1157
1113
4558
1000
2 Elevation
Polygon Id Area (km )
(m)
1524
Elevation
Polygon ID Area [km2]
[El.m]
1649 51.9 40.0
1682 56.3 272.6
1789 874.6 325.1
3317 94.8 274.6
3331 2,034.8 312.0
3378 153.1 657.1
Sub-Basins, Discharge
Observation Stations
and Province
C04
Elevation
Catchment Polygon Id Area (km2) C01
(m)
3942 181.2
C01 825
4306 397.9
C02 4648 70.9 650
C03 2718 104.0 615 C02
4745 93.2 C03
2762 80.5
C04 2785 124.3 700
4855 78.7
C04
2779 82.0
2797 94.3 C05
C05 730
2850 139.5
C06 4953 266.6 135
C06
C.A. of Tagum-Libuganon
Basin = 3,119 km2
Total Area of WRR-XI =
26,486 km 2
C09
2546 328.1
C07
C05 C02
C01 4602 186.9 355
C08
2460 275.2
C04
C02 2588 479.7 330
C03 4738 561.7 135
C04 4942 126.8 60
C05 4840 291.2 65
C06 2554 281.5 200
C07 2720 338.9 240
C08 4843 170.7 130
C09 4568 427.7 445
𝑄 =𝐴×𝑣
𝑣 = −𝐾 × 𝑖
𝑖 = ∆ℎ/𝐿
∆h = ℎ𝑎 − ℎ𝑏
Maximum
35
Draught Year
30
25 GW.
Inflow GW.
20 Potential Potential
15 MInimum GW. Potential
10
5
0
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Year
Source: JICA Survey Team
As the input data of the Groundwater Model, the amount of infiltration into the shallow
groundwater aquifer from bottom of the Tank Model is the input value as described above. In
addition, as shown in the Table below, the catchment area of each sub-basin, the average
elevation of the block, the initial groundwater level, the thickness (height) of the aquifer, the
connection width with the downstream block, the distance to the downstream block, and the
average altitude (height) of the downstream block are also input data for the Groundwater Model.
The altitude, the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ko) of the aquifer, and the porosity of the
1
Source: Summary of Western Area Groundwater Endowment Survey Results, Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan, 2015,
( https://www.pref.shizuoka.jp/kankyou/ka-060/tikasui_fuzon_kekka.html )
aquifer are also input data. The initial groundwater level, aquifer thickness, connection width,
saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ko) of the aquifer, and porosity are the model parameters.
The aquifer thickness was estimated based on the aquifer distribution. The depth of the wells
was assumed to be the aquifer depth, and the wells were divided into shallow groundwater and
deep groundwater with a 30 m as boundary. The aquifer depths were organized as 10 km mesh
grid data.
Figure D-52shows the example of aquifer depth distribution water resource region I and II. The
average shallow aquifer thickness of 25 m, which was clarified in this estimation, was applied
to Groundwater Model.
Hydraulic conductivity and porosity required for the Groundwater Model input were selected
based on the existing groundwater flow analysis reports in Metro Manila and Metro Cebu and
the results of pumping test in Pinatubo area. The physical properties are distributed to each
classification of the Groundwater Availability Map.
Table D-16 Example of Input Data and Parameters for Groundwater Model
C.A.[km^2]= 206.7
Area of This Block [km2]= 206.7 Width to D/S Block [m]= 1,000.0
Average Elevation of This Block [El.m]= 809.3 Thickness (Depth) of GW Aquifer [m]= 25.0
Initial GWL [El.m]= 804.3 Distance to D/S Block [m]= 22,417
Elevation of Base Lock [El.m]= 468.4 Elevation of D/S Block [El.m]= 177.4
K =5.0E-01 ~ 1.0E-07
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity K [cm/sec]= 3.8901E-04
P =0.05~0.4
Porosity of Aquifer [%]= 0.01
Figure D-52 Example of Shallow Aquifer Depth Distribution (Region I and II)
For details on how to calculate the amount of irrigation water requirement, refer to the next
section. In the calibration of the Groundwater Model, the diversion water requirement
considering the waterway loss was subtracted from the groundwater aquifer in each sub-basin
to the irrigation requirement (ten-day average water volume) by province. Diversion water
requirement was calculated by using the irrigation water requirement and assumed irrigation
efficiency at 54% as follows:
In the calibration of the Groundwater Model, the irrigation requirement was calculated by
changing the irrigation area by province (ten-day average area by rainy season and dry season)
for each year from 1979 to 2020.
For details on the calculation method of domestic, industrial, and other water demand, refer to
the next section. In the calibration of the Groundwater Model, the required water volume for
each year from 1979 to 2020 for domestic, industrial, and other water demand was calculated
for each province, and the required water volume for each province is multiplied by the area
ratio of each sub-basin. The required amount of the domestic, industrial, and other water demand
was subtracted from the groundwater in each sub-basin.
The list of groundwater level monitoring stations by the National Water Resources Board (NWRB) is
shown in Table below, and the location map is shown
in Figure right. Of the 47 groundwater level stations
in total, 22 groundwater level data were obtained
from NWRB. As shown in the location map, the
groundwater level observation stations are unevenly
distributed, and it can be seen that the number of
monitoring is not sufficient for national level
groundwater level verification.
Source: NWRB
Source: NWRB
Iloilo 3 Iloilo 6
15-May-19 23-Aug-19 1-Dec-19 10-Mar-20 18-Jun-20 26-Sep-20 4-Jan-21 14-Apr-21 15-May-19 23-Aug-19 1-Dec-19 10-Mar-20 18-Jun-20 26-Sep-20 4-Jan-21 14-Apr-21
0 0
1 1
Water Level (GL- m)
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5 6
6 7
Iloilo 4 Iloilo 8
15-May-19 23-Aug-19 1-Dec-19 10-Mar-20 18-Jun-20 26-Sep-20 4-Jan-21 14-Apr-21 15-May-19 23-Aug-19 1-Dec-19 10-Mar-20 18-Jun-20 26-Sep-20 4-Jan-21 14-Apr-21
0 0
1 1
Water Level (GL- m)
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
6 5
7 6
Source: NWRB
2 35
3 36
4 37
5 38
6 39
7 40
6 1
8
10 1.5
12
14 2
16 2.5
18
20 3
Source: NWRB
Pmpanga 3 Pmpanga 3
15-May-19 23-Aug-19 1-Dec-19 10-Mar-20 18-Jun-20 26-Sep-20 4-Jan-21 14-Apr-21 15-May-19 23-Aug-19 1-Dec-19 10-Mar-20 18-Jun-20 26-Sep-20 4-Jan-21 14-Apr-21
0 0
2 2
Water Level (GL- m)
Pmpanga 6
Pmpanga 5
15-May-19 23-Aug-19 1-Dec-19 10-Mar-20 18-Jun-20 26-Sep-20 4-Jan-21 14-Apr-21
15-May-19 23-Aug-19 1-Dec-19 10-Mar-20 18-Jun-20 26-Sep-20 4-Jan-21 14-Apr-21 0
16.315
2
4
16.325
16.33 6
16.335 8
16.34 10
16.345 12
16.35
14
16.355
Pmpanga 7
22.55
22.6
22.65
22.7
22.75
Source: NWRB
15-May-19 23-Aug-19 1-Dec-19 10-Mar-20 18-Jun-20 26-Sep-20 4-Jan-21 14-Apr-21 15-May-19 23-Aug-19 1-Dec-19 10-Mar-20 18-Jun-20 26-Sep-20 4-Jan-21 14-Apr-21
0 0
1 5
Water Level (GL- m)
2
10
3
15
4
20
5
6 25
7 30
Source: NWRB
Occidental Mindoro
Occidental Mindoro Occidental Mindoro
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
No. Province Camiguin Capiz Catanduan Cavite Cebu Composte
Davao de Davao del Davao del Davao Dinagat Eastern Guimaras Ifugao Ilocos Ilocos Sur Iloilo Isabela Kalinga La Union Laguna
es la Valley
Oro Norte Sur Oriental Islands Samar Norte
Year mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr
1 1979 1,481 2,595 2,041 3,177 1,622 3,567 1,869 2,065 2,291 2,010 1,964 2,289 2,708 2,099 2,718 2,150 2,449 2,747 3,216 2,328
2 1980 2,121 3,075 2,360 2,229 2,240 4,113 2,178 2,175 2,768 3,160 2,637 2,075 2,473 2,206 2,971 2,408 2,712 2,608 3,485 2,040
3 1981 1,695 2,887 2,882 1,694 1,470 2,464 2,258 1,551 1,995 2,107 3,080 2,218 2,360 2,367 2,472 2,399 2,235 2,496 2,266 2,352
4 1982 1,524 2,394 2,565 1,632 1,294 2,626 2,421 1,575 2,235 2,089 2,865 2,193 2,112 2,039 1,923 2,095 2,201 1,785 2,161 2,110
5 1983 1,727 2,292 1,945 1,202 1,480 2,724 2,548 1,980 2,284 1,967 2,798 2,060 1,553 1,706 1,692 2,032 1,531 1,505 1,850 1,451
6 1984 2,596 3,098 2,521 2,013 1,978 4,231 3,469 2,437 3,576 3,063 4,096 2,907 2,589 2,171 2,274 2,862 2,347 2,264 2,503 2,163
7 1985 1,742 2,623 3,148 1,713 1,624 3,194 2,925 1,948 2,613 2,299 3,377 2,082 2,603 2,599 2,666 2,255 2,383 2,306 2,742 2,254
8 1986 1,920 2,686 2,763 2,338 1,677 3,288 2,906 1,936 2,601 2,402 3,508 2,542 2,873 2,781 2,771 2,458 2,981 2,756 2,920 2,694
9 1987 1,391 2,073 2,397 1,302 1,174 2,516 2,187 1,535 1,996 1,698 2,466 2,074 2,034 1,560 1,814 1,976 1,790 1,851 1,974 1,793
10 1988 1,788 2,755 2,982 1,837 1,656 3,220 2,869 1,995 2,666 2,289 3,273 2,427 2,493 2,227 2,399 2,388 2,550 2,266 2,503 2,369
11 1989 1,736 2,631 3,140 1,864 1,484 3,333 2,992 2,056 2,775 2,481 3,649 2,292 2,618 2,398 2,778 2,335 2,317 2,272 3,094 2,204
12 1990 1,354 2,686 2,622 2,153 1,574 2,734 2,514 1,830 2,289 1,948 2,766 2,520 2,451 2,706 2,948 2,432 2,112 2,310 3,065 2,539
13 1991 1,278 2,175 2,334 2,012 1,268 2,412 2,191 1,428 1,992 1,840 3,022 2,102 2,080 2,101 2,083 2,037 1,801 1,966 2,217 2,061
14 1992 1,092 2,053 1,939 1,959 1,045 2,204 2,057 1,419 1,800 1,277 1,928 1,796 2,255 2,363 2,520 1,764 1,868 2,093 3,016 2,128
15 1993 1,697 2,655 3,166 2,123 1,614 3,191 2,820 1,789 2,533 2,169 3,436 2,282 2,096 1,655 1,936 2,355 2,090 1,809 2,278 2,632
16 1994 1,729 2,965 2,518 1,915 1,566 3,050 2,749 1,852 2,515 2,372 3,128 2,553 1,993 2,230 2,322 2,578 1,661 1,883 2,274 2,096
17 1995 2,096 3,171 3,586 2,260 1,773 3,130 2,824 1,970 2,578 2,336 3,531 2,726 2,063 1,963 2,072 2,739 2,362 2,051 2,120 2,870
18 1996 2,242 2,732 2,692 1,696 1,870 3,485 3,086 2,048 2,781 2,673 4,075 2,586 2,387 2,308 2,447 2,604 2,414 2,286 2,625 2,240
19 1997 1,638 2,168 1,882 1,492 1,276 3,349 2,884 1,737 2,619 1,889 2,592 2,013 2,090 1,884 2,087 1,936 1,748 1,814 2,430 1,656
20 1998 1,183 2,486 3,067 1,901 1,252 2,029 1,890 1,402 1,690 1,425 2,322 1,937 2,320 1,894 2,002 2,062 2,747 2,145 2,069 2,831
21 1999 2,663 3,099 4,043 2,744 2,060 4,494 3,774 2,533 3,740 3,421 4,749 2,781 3,443 2,857 3,103 2,721 3,920 2,874 3,438 3,647
22 2000 2,179 3,599 4,146 2,758 2,048 3,856 3,329 2,343 3,227 2,777 4,560 2,763 3,198 2,272 2,609 2,989 3,632 2,631 3,019 3,910
23 2001 2,452 3,049 3,315 1,690 1,961 3,722 3,246 2,208 3,059 2,882 4,200 2,526 2,633 2,419 2,425 2,600 2,413 2,299 2,413 2,396
24 2002 1,268 2,057 2,343 2,096 1,327 2,515 2,359 1,611 2,133 2,014 3,006 2,215 1,978 1,935 2,077 2,002 1,759 1,692 2,477 2,405
25 2003 2,001 2,242 2,203 1,510 1,758 3,320 3,049 2,009 2,598 2,459 3,193 2,412 2,194 2,008 2,512 2,263 1,707 1,950 3,029 1,907
26 2004 1,240 2,450 2,988 1,466 1,302 2,337 2,331 1,710 1,833 1,991 2,968 2,172 2,360 1,876 2,175 2,159 2,111 1,960 2,634 2,029
27 2005 1,648 2,676 3,170 2,136 1,483 3,119 2,997 2,100 2,515 2,428 3,215 2,382 2,461 2,153 2,289 2,381 2,654 2,269 2,305 2,856
28 2006 1,557 3,123 2,857 2,144 1,733 3,250 2,852 2,065 2,747 2,212 3,274 2,861 2,340 1,818 2,032 2,811 2,685 1,955 2,418 2,959
29 2007 1,983 3,104 3,024 2,213 1,723 3,509 2,986 2,061 2,895 2,532 3,225 2,805 2,432 2,179 2,484 2,800 2,422 2,304 2,756 2,725
30 2008 2,325 3,905 4,263 2,402 2,245 3,999 3,360 2,475 3,456 3,233 5,160 3,080 2,581 2,481 2,725 3,299 2,628 2,456 2,911 3,321
31 2009 2,095 3,182 3,715 2,776 1,762 4,021 3,489 2,261 3,227 2,450 3,888 2,658 3,082 2,873 3,293 2,743 2,651 2,749 3,583 3,228
32 2010 1,746 2,954 3,292 1,826 1,712 3,217 2,752 2,025 2,783 2,031 2,902 2,905 2,319 2,054 2,219 2,718 2,333 2,055 2,348 2,606
33 2011 2,873 3,789 4,607 2,750 2,729 5,070 4,184 2,805 4,168 4,100 6,072 3,230 2,995 2,514 2,688 3,302 3,408 2,575 2,948 3,507
34 2012 2,023 3,158 3,460 3,092 1,815 4,105 3,460 2,469 3,423 2,645 3,987 2,630 2,619 2,428 2,835 2,716 2,417 2,169 3,305 3,350
35 2013 2,293 3,145 3,283 2,769 1,900 4,044 3,404 2,396 3,431 2,502 3,848 2,817 2,497 2,178 2,441 2,808 2,713 2,072 2,858 3,287
36 2014 2,789 3,017 2,934 1,923 2,120 3,698 3,063 1,954 2,890 2,984 4,534 2,791 2,020 2,000 2,398 2,756 1,878 1,672 2,498 2,705
37 2015 1,479 1,780 1,901 1,687 1,096 2,445 2,223 1,450 2,025 1,692 2,299 1,713 2,179 1,794 2,391 1,635 2,194 1,806 2,686 2,191
38 2016 1,568 2,696 2,677 1,972 1,570 2,637 2,480 1,829 2,124 1,830 2,791 2,288 2,209 2,174 2,290 2,419 2,405 2,022 2,799 2,643
39 2017 2,768 3,530 3,232 2,271 2,189 4,673 3,882 2,711 3,775 2,975 4,098 2,970 2,369 1,908 2,126 3,047 2,708 2,007 2,511 3,376
40 2018 1,839 2,484 3,000 2,097 1,653 2,984 2,627 1,859 2,479 2,858 4,681 2,049 2,261 2,231 2,869 2,160 2,043 1,911 3,519 2,497
41 2019 1,461 2,396 1,970 1,867 1,189 2,473 2,173 1,597 2,084 1,474 2,135 2,171 2,588 2,775 2,761 2,099 2,616 2,603 3,028 2,342
42 2020 1,768 3,008 3,334 2,092 1,767 2,886 2,557 1,913 2,523 2,017 3,272 2,618 2,557 1,695 1,943 2,688 3,229 2,217 2,185 3,221
Maximum 2,873 3,905 4,607 3,177 2,729 5,070 4,184 2,805 4,168 4,100 6,072 3,230 3,443 2,873 3,293 3,302 3,920 2,874 3,583 3,910
Average 1,858 2,777 2,912 2,067 1,668 3,267 2,815 1,979 2,660 2,357 3,395 2,441 2,416 2,188 2,419 2,452 2,401 2,178 2,678 2,569
Minimum 1,092 1,780 1,882 1,202 1,045 2,029 1,869 1,402 1,690 1,277 1,928 1,713 1,553 1,560 1,692 1,635 1,531 1,505 1,850 1,451
Provable Excess
Year Probability Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year
5 20.0% 2015 1982 2002 1981 2004 1987 1981 2002 2016 1990 1990 1985 1993 1998 2002 1982 2014 1994 1994 1982
10 10.0% 1991 1997 2019 2003 1998 2015 1980 1987 1981 1987 1998 2018 1987 2015 2020 2002 2002 2015 1982 2004
Legend: : 1/5-Dry Year : 1/10-Dry Year
Table D-20 1/5-Drought Year and the Annual Rainfall by Province (2/2)
41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
No. Province Lanao del Lanao del Leyte Maguinda Marinduq Masbate Metropolit Misamis Misamis Mountain Negros Negros North Northern Nueva Nueva Occidenta Oriental Palawan Pampanga
Norte Sur nao ue an Manila Occidenta Oriental Province Occidenta Oriental Cotabato Samar Ecija Vizcaya l Mindoro Mindoro
l l
Year mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr
1 1979 2,575 4,046 1,859 2,365 2,314 1,933 2,263 2,242 2,191 2,860 2,573 2,090 2,389 1,948 2,035 2,100 3,539 3,295 2,235 1,907
2 1980 2,963 4,236 2,506 2,521 2,015 2,039 1,632 2,668 2,785 2,617 2,988 2,390 2,574 2,263 2,180 2,397 2,786 2,632 2,811 1,549
3 1981 2,479 2,789 2,582 1,980 1,639 2,093 2,185 2,012 1,948 2,420 2,086 1,693 2,051 2,981 1,975 2,026 2,489 2,155 1,970 2,022
4 1982 2,400 2,931 2,258 2,066 1,528 1,564 2,022 1,915 1,820 1,938 1,964 1,567 2,225 2,560 1,894 1,942 2,296 1,851 1,728 2,001
5 1983 2,603 3,233 2,493 2,368 1,140 1,633 1,489 2,097 2,029 1,524 2,024 1,748 2,604 2,476 1,291 1,356 1,858 1,489 1,767 1,413
6 1984 3,286 3,702 3,359 2,682 1,535 2,241 2,167 2,854 2,830 2,423 2,752 2,319 2,988 3,510 2,144 2,271 2,885 2,293 1,824 2,221
7 1985 2,929 3,495 2,553 2,404 1,497 1,840 2,162 2,220 2,314 2,521 2,190 1,856 2,639 3,022 2,093 2,202 2,449 2,028 2,024 2,269
8 1986 2,718 3,235 2,885 2,305 1,623 1,894 2,781 2,225 2,349 2,791 2,355 1,941 2,564 2,862 2,634 2,663 2,927 2,300 1,851 2,789
9 1987 2,127 2,685 1,964 1,900 1,233 1,456 1,665 1,596 1,526 1,978 1,732 1,402 2,120 2,292 1,628 1,839 1,938 1,535 1,623 1,575
10 1988 2,894 3,248 2,727 2,251 1,757 2,112 2,204 2,278 2,306 2,414 2,279 1,937 2,442 3,137 2,148 2,401 2,614 2,283 2,101 2,117
11 1989 2,761 3,291 2,869 2,279 1,438 1,977 2,251 2,243 2,250 2,529 2,108 1,745 2,599 3,430 2,387 2,609 2,597 2,012 1,853 2,241
12 1990 2,648 3,139 2,398 2,241 1,528 1,626 2,581 2,095 1,937 2,454 2,249 1,825 2,516 2,482 2,287 2,291 2,862 2,210 1,979 2,506
13 1991 2,106 2,652 2,210 1,809 1,344 1,609 2,109 1,703 1,767 2,111 1,784 1,464 2,009 2,584 1,846 1,817 2,557 1,890 1,619 2,253
14 1992 2,094 2,618 1,597 1,803 1,217 1,368 2,293 1,656 1,409 2,292 1,624 1,282 1,962 1,787 2,166 2,109 2,351 1,760 1,541 2,504
15 1993 2,902 3,332 2,795 2,273 1,858 2,063 2,463 2,236 2,149 1,946 2,276 1,836 2,485 3,003 1,961 2,088 2,832 2,377 2,012 2,038
16 1994 2,510 2,940 2,629 2,168 1,446 1,997 2,165 2,077 2,188 2,013 2,246 1,750 2,364 2,877 1,942 1,904 2,489 2,011 1,942 2,249
17 1995 3,362 3,711 2,820 2,482 1,905 2,275 2,700 2,798 2,562 2,132 2,711 2,214 2,643 3,243 2,207 2,001 2,986 2,469 2,343 2,382
18 1996 3,464 3,760 3,274 2,596 1,411 1,998 2,055 2,863 2,704 2,400 2,585 2,235 2,788 3,530 2,090 2,195 2,411 1,963 2,092 2,088
19 1997 2,434 2,965 2,096 2,076 1,095 1,407 1,878 1,979 2,089 2,043 1,860 1,529 2,387 2,069 1,833 1,918 2,056 1,540 1,377 2,012
20 1998 2,378 2,649 1,840 1,883 1,646 1,698 2,398 1,936 1,497 2,212 1,866 1,667 1,895 2,371 2,254 2,310 2,650 2,307 2,048 2,013
21 1999 3,828 4,128 3,833 2,862 1,944 2,410 3,509 3,363 3,084 3,150 2,676 2,580 3,102 4,118 3,317 3,425 3,069 2,534 2,456 3,248
22 2000 3,200 3,534 3,653 2,669 2,436 2,665 3,539 2,816 2,569 2,882 2,654 2,321 2,968 4,410 3,416 3,444 3,553 2,993 2,273 3,397
23 2001 3,335 3,687 3,387 2,571 1,729 2,312 2,150 2,839 2,778 2,531 2,454 2,047 2,902 3,837 2,137 2,451 2,666 2,261 1,983 2,087
24 2002 2,391 2,755 2,343 2,012 1,324 1,565 2,487 1,857 1,790 1,918 1,979 1,605 2,135 2,503 1,890 1,843 2,341 1,733 1,595 2,170
25 2003 3,176 3,750 2,839 2,770 1,238 1,597 1,879 2,433 2,294 2,134 2,374 2,120 2,938 2,488 2,019 2,050 2,366 1,836 2,021 2,024
26 2004 2,517 3,100 2,253 2,348 1,449 1,650 1,952 1,866 1,668 2,173 2,043 1,706 2,475 2,644 2,212 2,315 2,353 1,923 1,647 2,119
27 2005 2,894 3,384 2,593 2,423 1,957 2,135 2,572 2,326 2,078 2,350 2,070 1,630 2,675 2,937 2,110 2,201 2,744 2,171 2,289 2,131
28 2006 2,669 2,997 2,721 2,271 1,912 2,212 2,677 2,274 1,927 2,100 2,443 1,869 2,538 2,984 2,263 2,340 2,971 2,443 2,130 2,232
29 2007 2,948 3,236 2,921 2,411 1,786 2,279 2,707 2,532 2,443 2,412 2,458 1,981 2,622 3,108 2,426 2,448 2,995 2,497 1,953 2,550
30 2008 3,856 4,004 4,155 2,962 2,148 2,690 2,826 3,298 2,803 2,618 3,069 2,575 3,016 4,580 2,637 2,655 3,136 2,735 2,251 2,554
31 2009 3,454 3,964 3,101 2,961 2,039 2,271 3,380 2,965 2,634 3,104 2,512 2,163 3,132 3,515 2,848 2,989 3,287 2,665 2,257 3,163
32 2010 3,250 3,403 2,603 2,529 1,837 1,782 2,224 2,769 2,210 2,233 2,715 2,291 2,591 2,861 2,047 2,223 2,722 2,322 2,098 1,950
33 2011 3,744 4,077 4,949 2,958 2,233 3,244 3,404 3,418 3,386 2,762 3,257 2,824 3,355 5,334 3,064 2,976 3,594 2,851 2,365 3,322
34 2012 3,289 3,634 3,199 2,801 2,086 2,361 3,542 2,663 2,589 2,508 2,432 2,087 3,012 3,909 2,689 2,497 3,402 2,545 2,110 3,381
35 2013 3,449 3,865 3,102 2,755 2,067 2,172 3,046 2,840 2,744 2,328 2,686 2,285 2,978 3,576 2,610 2,556 3,513 2,832 2,333 2,725
36 2014 3,098 3,326 3,696 2,395 1,616 2,273 2,219 2,681 2,725 1,999 2,656 2,278 2,644 4,006 1,900 1,882 2,640 2,138 1,972 1,935
37 2015 2,059 2,396 1,945 1,768 1,374 1,423 1,902 1,569 1,728 2,132 1,574 1,230 2,011 1,994 1,932 2,157 2,034 1,622 1,162 1,933
38 2016 2,600 2,952 2,311 2,305 1,714 1,821 2,378 2,012 2,084 2,118 2,154 1,765 2,404 2,632 2,178 2,184 2,716 2,182 1,980 2,364
39 2017 3,551 3,982 3,619 3,002 2,269 2,452 2,783 3,056 3,178 2,180 2,817 2,517 3,389 3,732 2,341 2,409 3,134 2,821 2,315 2,346
40 2018 2,624 3,031 3,363 2,333 1,539 2,151 2,463 2,150 2,042 2,224 2,089 1,794 2,477 3,766 2,279 2,185 2,521 1,922 1,847 2,481
41 2019 2,100 2,516 1,820 1,869 1,227 1,479 2,134 1,646 1,716 2,667 1,781 1,415 2,090 2,054 2,117 2,246 2,421 1,819 1,619 2,414
42 2020 3,116 3,483 2,579 2,479 2,184 2,255 2,526 2,602 2,194 2,311 2,583 2,141 2,603 3,224 2,459 2,503 2,996 2,676 1,999 2,127
Maximum 3,856 4,236 4,949 3,002 2,436 3,244 3,542 3,418 3,386 3,150 3,257 2,824 3,389 5,334 3,416 3,444 3,594 3,295 2,811 3,397
Average 2,876 3,330 2,779 2,379 1,697 2,001 2,423 2,373 2,269 2,344 2,327 1,946 2,579 3,063 2,235 2,296 2,732 2,236 1,986 2,305
Minimum 2,059 2,396 1,597 1,768 1,095 1,368 1,489 1,569 1,409 1,524 1,574 1,230 1,895 1,787 1,291 1,356 1,858 1,489 1,162 1,413
Provable Excess
Year Probability Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year
5 20.0% 1997 1982 2004 1982 2015 1991 1996 1998 1982 2006 2002 2005 1982 1983 1994 1995 2003 1982 1982 1997
10 10.0% 1987 1991 2015 1998 1987 2019 2003 1991 2019 1987 1991 1991 1981 1997 2002 2014 1982 2002 1991 2015
Legend: : 1/5-Dry Year : 1/10-Dry Year
61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81
No. Province Pangasina Quezon Quirino Rizal Romblon Samar Sarangani Siquijor Sorsogon South Southern Sultan Sulu Surigao Surigao Tarlac Tawi- Zambales Zamboang Zamboang Zamboa
n Cotabato Leyte Kudarat del Norte del Sur Tawi a del a del Sur nga
Norte Sibugay
Year mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr mm/yr
1 1979 2,092 2,431 2,210 2,562 2,415 1,836 2,377 1,413 2,232 2,405 1,818 2,970 1,708 1,857 2,461 1,957 1,935 2,669 2,655 2,354 2,425
2 1980 2,034 2,378 2,519 2,012 2,540 2,157 2,394 1,887 2,156 2,453 2,849 3,236 1,850 2,819 3,530 1,721 2,121 2,438 3,103 2,534 2,494
3 1981 1,825 2,344 2,401 2,660 1,943 3,243 1,472 925 2,713 1,447 2,270 1,818 1,438 2,613 2,797 1,955 1,500 2,291 2,048 2,115 2,278
4 1982 2,002 2,235 2,285 2,490 1,570 2,916 1,391 960 2,386 1,532 2,052 1,993 965 2,704 3,025 2,084 1,096 2,480 1,934 2,025 2,224
5 1983 1,454 1,477 1,504 1,707 1,529 2,946 1,870 1,005 2,093 1,997 2,393 2,367 1,120 2,424 2,529 1,386 1,254 1,697 2,152 2,262 2,369
6 1984 2,302 2,096 2,455 2,442 1,986 3,980 2,187 1,262 2,782 1,947 3,232 2,300 1,748 3,902 4,206 2,246 1,778 2,780 2,680 2,876 3,061
7 1985 2,371 2,126 2,427 2,463 1,550 3,365 1,754 1,083 2,750 1,788 2,420 2,333 1,231 2,808 3,276 2,373 1,282 2,828 2,235 2,350 2,568
8 1986 2,476 2,322 3,104 3,144 1,909 3,448 1,839 1,132 2,365 1,927 2,598 2,219 1,208 3,045 3,365 2,638 1,169 3,114 2,247 2,280 2,541
9 1987 1,565 1,778 2,052 1,937 1,296 2,483 1,381 701 2,163 1,437 1,794 1,773 853 2,134 2,374 1,592 946 1,925 1,529 1,908 2,032
10 1988 2,327 2,373 2,773 2,633 2,021 3,434 1,786 1,161 2,776 1,743 2,567 2,201 1,433 2,864 3,323 2,314 1,500 2,747 2,478 2,464 2,694
11 1989 2,443 2,191 2,897 2,602 1,659 3,614 1,909 989 2,962 1,892 2,650 2,310 1,394 3,171 3,569 2,320 1,358 2,754 2,190 2,230 2,407
12 1990 2,599 2,228 2,471 2,864 1,651 2,748 1,548 982 2,247 1,682 2,209 2,160 1,182 2,335 2,657 2,527 1,122 3,056 2,379 2,462 2,760
13 1991 2,034 1,847 1,944 2,353 1,475 2,963 1,171 709 2,175 1,241 1,994 1,582 882 2,243 2,649 2,256 920 2,994 1,737 1,880 2,140
14 1992 2,618 1,904 2,128 2,566 1,316 2,046 1,273 670 1,772 1,336 1,403 1,732 846 1,746 1,815 2,579 904 3,225 1,747 1,806 1,910
15 1993 2,009 2,457 2,387 2,731 1,899 3,483 1,583 1,094 2,765 1,694 2,406 2,158 1,040 2,713 3,240 1,937 979 2,451 2,290 2,407 2,618
16 1994 1,984 2,002 2,070 2,468 1,767 3,268 1,707 989 2,506 1,722 2,450 1,978 1,552 3,023 3,293 2,190 1,407 2,686 2,385 2,424 2,952
17 1995 2,028 2,715 2,439 3,313 2,134 3,677 1,807 1,303 3,238 1,927 2,489 2,460 1,370 2,864 3,176 2,107 1,441 2,596 2,704 2,708 2,845
18 1996 2,016 2,093 2,577 2,625 1,540 4,117 1,832 1,413 2,902 1,870 2,862 2,453 1,857 3,317 3,787 2,084 1,660 2,426 2,976 3,026 3,246
19 1997 2,096 1,565 1,825 2,010 1,237 2,561 1,413 832 1,815 1,475 1,994 1,866 784 2,549 3,257 2,116 847 2,587 1,936 1,998 2,252
20 1998 1,775 2,682 2,805 3,156 1,867 2,452 1,409 966 2,472 1,340 1,577 1,736 1,297 1,684 1,946 1,890 1,242 2,247 2,192 2,149 2,273
21 1999 3,079 3,428 4,464 4,540 2,030 4,745 2,342 1,673 3,657 2,290 3,478 2,837 1,992 4,201 4,766 3,278 1,852 3,664 3,406 3,335 3,760
22 2000 3,040 3,685 4,340 4,581 2,323 4,729 2,174 1,511 3,915 2,132 3,080 2,563 1,539 3,475 3,985 3,292 1,646 3,951 2,668 2,805 3,078
23 2001 2,051 2,499 2,837 2,649 1,970 4,243 2,008 1,398 3,085 2,000 3,174 2,394 1,555 3,494 4,164 2,122 1,562 2,507 2,701 2,758 3,074
24 2002 2,234 2,132 2,021 2,753 1,317 2,970 1,396 869 2,189 1,433 2,153 1,857 1,065 2,702 2,931 2,263 902 2,820 2,149 2,190 2,541
25 2003 2,485 1,741 2,088 2,229 1,574 3,074 1,684 1,157 2,117 1,910 2,792 2,555 1,320 2,996 3,608 2,306 1,211 2,628 2,632 2,805 3,098
26 2004 2,367 2,026 2,517 2,377 1,607 2,996 1,552 826 2,462 1,684 2,051 2,154 1,071 2,634 2,828 2,309 1,099 2,689 2,011 2,212 2,489
27 2005 1,858 2,750 2,644 3,095 1,754 3,310 1,877 938 2,925 1,896 2,552 2,319 1,385 2,905 3,304 1,878 1,468 2,323 2,369 2,516 2,836
28 2006 2,063 2,743 2,843 3,326 2,113 3,358 1,850 1,027 2,953 1,888 2,575 2,259 1,749 2,689 2,967 2,020 1,660 2,474 2,429 2,546 2,942
29 2007 2,264 2,518 2,814 3,152 2,192 3,413 1,886 1,165 2,897 1,825 2,764 2,324 1,553 3,078 3,710 2,249 1,599 2,831 2,567 2,618 2,866
30 2008 2,407 3,226 3,106 3,661 2,279 5,239 2,384 1,492 3,944 2,351 3,529 2,969 2,016 3,803 4,417 2,478 1,772 2,859 3,356 3,415 3,775
31 2009 3,096 2,879 3,218 3,804 2,247 3,930 2,066 1,243 3,345 2,189 2,697 2,777 1,574 3,162 4,267 3,035 1,476 3,541 2,929 3,121 3,424
32 2010 1,977 2,644 2,421 2,855 1,990 3,114 1,917 1,285 2,607 1,925 2,181 2,466 1,621 2,603 3,204 1,854 1,487 2,280 2,959 2,936 3,226
33 2011 2,790 3,243 3,723 3,993 2,542 6,056 2,526 1,657 4,509 2,452 4,476 2,930 1,770 5,189 5,680 2,994 1,898 3,697 3,098 3,198 3,409
34 2012 2,949 2,927 2,748 3,883 2,123 4,114 2,272 1,239 3,489 2,285 2,817 2,836 1,651 3,280 3,839 3,100 1,631 4,002 3,003 3,073 3,433
35 2013 2,496 2,868 3,018 3,586 2,071 3,865 2,208 1,311 3,058 2,179 2,841 2,669 1,613 3,110 4,037 2,577 1,408 3,159 2,992 3,052 3,267
36 2014 2,167 2,450 2,080 2,820 1,830 4,691 1,673 1,387 3,090 1,810 3,134 2,269 975 3,684 4,175 2,147 978 2,581 2,486 2,543 2,583
37 2015 2,355 1,971 2,384 2,253 1,224 2,221 1,169 674 1,982 1,312 1,789 1,639 711 2,159 2,587 2,178 622 2,599 1,724 1,824 2,044
38 2016 2,487 2,464 2,567 2,894 1,780 2,902 1,646 961 2,505 1,812 2,111 2,262 1,140 2,287 2,560 2,526 1,061 3,233 2,245 2,350 2,487
39 2017 2,048 3,360 3,006 3,696 2,257 4,221 2,437 1,490 3,319 2,469 3,346 2,956 1,663 3,626 4,506 2,174 1,590 2,546 3,085 3,126 3,369
40 2018 2,800 2,368 2,240 2,777 1,492 4,304 1,541 957 3,285 1,686 3,085 2,195 1,185 3,212 3,178 2,688 1,117 3,298 2,233 2,405 2,692
41 2019 2,331 1,895 2,329 2,504 1,442 2,203 1,379 828 2,014 1,495 1,705 1,847 746 1,915 2,456 2,455 696 3,079 1,685 1,779 1,912
42 2020 1,949 3,123 3,116 3,480 2,178 3,389 1,644 1,164 3,016 1,749 2,297 2,271 1,372 2,560 2,954 1,995 1,284 2,344 2,789 2,846 3,055
Maximum 3,096 3,685 4,464 4,581 2,542 6,056 2,526 1,887 4,509 2,469 4,476 3,236 2,016 5,189 5,680 3,292 2,121 4,002 3,406 3,415 3,775
Average 2,270 2,433 2,614 2,896 1,849 3,424 1,803 1,136 2,753 1,848 2,539 2,309 1,358 2,895 3,343 2,290 1,345 2,788 2,455 2,517 2,749
Minimum 1,454 1,477 1,504 1,707 1,224 1,836 1,169 670 1,772 1,241 1,403 1,582 711 1,684 1,815 1,386 622 1,697 1,529 1,779 1,910
Provable Excess
Year Probability Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year
5 20.0% 1982 1994 1992 1984 1983 1990 1997 1981 1991 2019 2004 1997 1993 1990 1991 1979 1993 1980 1981 1998 1981
10 10.0% 2005 1991 1987 2003 2002 2015 1987 2004 1983 2002 1987 1987 1987 1987 1979 2005 1992 1981 1992 1987 1991
Legend: : 1/5-Dry Year : 1/10-Dry Year
Source: JICA Survey Team based on the data of DPWH, NIA and NPC.
Source: JICA Survey Team based on the data of DPWH, NIA and NPC.
Reservoir
Storage Capacity at Full Supply Level (FSL): 1.08 billion cubic meters
Elevation at FSL: 193 masl
Minimum Supply Level: 160 masl
Maximum Flood Level: 193 masl
Power
Installed capacity: 360 Megawatts
Turbine: 4 units, Francis vertical shaft
Generator: 4 units x 90 MW, vertical synchronous
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magat Dam
The Magat Dam reservoir operation records from 1983 to 2020 were collected from NIA as shown in
Figure below.
2
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magat Dam
800 185
700
175
600
165
500
400 155
300
145
200
135
100
0 125
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Mean Inflow Total Outflow Res. Level
800 185
700
175
600
165
500
400 155
300
145
200
135
100
0 125
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Mean Inflow Total Outflow Res. Level
Source: NIA
Figure D-62 Reservoir Operation Records at Magat Dam from 1983 to 2020
The mean monthly water level and the reservoir operation rule curve at Magat Dam is shown in Figure
below.
Operation Rule Curve and Average Reservoir Water Level (Average from 1983-2020)
195
190
Reservoir water Level (El.m)
185
180
165
160
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Operation Record of Magat Dam by NIA.
Figure D-63 Mean Monthly Water Level and Reservoir Operation Rule Curve at Magat Dam
Mean monthly inflow and total outflow at Magat Dam is shown in Figure below.
800
700
Reservoir water Level (El.m)
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Operation Record of Magat Dam by NIA.
Figure D-64 Mean Monthly Inflow and Total Outflow at Magat Dam
Assumed reservoir capacity curve (H-V-A curve) of Magat Dam reservoir is shown in Figure below.
180 180
170 170
160 160
150 150
140 140
130 130
120 120
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200
Reservoir Capacity (MCM)
Figure D-65 Assumed Reservoir Capacity Curve (H-V-A Curve) of Magat Dam
Using above H-V-A curve, reservoir operation rule curve and operation records, reservoir operation
simulation model was created as shown in Table below.
Table D-21 Reservoir Operation Simulation Model for Magat Dam
Turbin Q= 70.00 m3/s FSL= 1,095.67 193.00
MAGAT RESERVOIR
Reservoir (Temp) Mean Inflow Inflow (Temp) Operation Operation Required Required Irrigation W. Irrigation W. Design Design Turbine Mean Outflow Sub-Total Sub-Total (Temp) Spill Out Spill Out (Final) (Final) Total
Water Level Res.Vol. Discharge Volume Res.Vol. Rule Curve Rule Curve Outflow Outflow Requirement Requirement Outflow Outflow Discharge (Pstk. & Orif.) Outflow Outflow Res.Volume Volume Discharge Res.Volume Res.WL. Outflow
Date Year Month Day Date (El.m) (MCM) (m3/s) (MCM) (MCM) (El.m) (MCM) (MCM) (m3/s) (m3/s) (MCM) (MCM) (m3/s) (m3/s) (m3/s) (m3/s) (MCM) (MCM) (MCM) (m3/s) (MCM) (El.m) (m3/s)
1979/1/1 1979 1 1 1/1 189.34 965.87 174.3 15.06 980.93 193.00 1,095.67 0.00 0.00 193.00 16.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 980.93 0.00 0.00 980.93 191.16 0.00
1979/1/2 1979 1 2 1/2 191.16 980.93 166.0 14.34 995.27 192.87 1,090.73 0.00 0.00 192.87 16.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 995.27 0.00 0.00 995.27 191.94 0.00
1979/1/3 1979 1 3 1/3 191.94 995.27 150.9 13.04 1,008.31 192.73 1,085.90 0.00 0.00 192.73 16.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,008.31 0.00 0.00 1,008.31 192.69 0.00
1979/1/4 1979 1 4 1/4 192.69 1,008.31 134.1 11.59 1,019.90 192.60 1,081.08 0.00 0.00 192.60 16.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,019.90 0.00 0.00 1,019.90 193.39 0.00
1979/1/5 1979 1 5 1/5 193.39 1,019.90 128.6 11.11 1,031.01 192.47 1,076.26 0.00 0.00 192.47 16.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,031.01 0.00 0.00 1,031.01 194.08 0.00
1979/1/6 1979 1 6 1/6 194.08 1,031.01 123.3 10.66 1,041.67 192.34 1,071.46 0.00 0.00 192.34 16.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,041.67 0.00 0.00 1,041.67 194.77 0.00
1979/1/7 1979 1 7 1/7 194.77 1,041.67 112.1 9.68 1,051.35 192.20 1,066.67 0.00 0.00 192.20 16.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,051.35 0.00 0.00 1,051.35 195.42 0.00
1979/1/8 1979 1 8 1/8 195.42 1,051.35 113.9 9.84 1,061.19 192.07 1,061.89 0.00 0.00 192.07 16.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,061.19 0.00 0.00 1,061.19 196.10 0.00
1979/1/9 1979 1 9 1/9 196.10 1,061.19 107.2 9.26 1,070.46 191.94 1,057.13 13.33 154.30 191.94 16.58 13.33 154.30 70.00 84.30 154.30 13.33 1,057.13 0.00 0.00 1,057.13 195.82 154.30
1979/1/10 1979 1 10 1/10 195.82 1,057.13 106.9 9.23 1,066.36 191.81 1,052.37 13.99 161.96 191.81 16.57 13.99 161.96 70.00 91.96 161.96 13.99 1,052.37 0.00 0.00 1,052.37 195.49 161.96
1979/1/11 1979 1 11 1/11 195.49 1,052.37 108.4 9.37 1,061.74 191.67 1,047.62 14.12 163.39 191.67 16.56 14.12 163.39 70.00 93.39 163.39 14.12 1,047.62 0.00 0.00 1,047.62 195.17 163.39
1979/1/12 1979 1 12 1/12 195.17 1,047.62 103.3 8.93 1,056.55 191.54 1,042.88 13.67 158.17 191.54 16.55 13.67 158.17 70.00 88.17 158.17 13.67 1,042.88 0.00 0.00 1,042.88 194.85 158.17
1979/1/13 1979 1 13 1/13 194.85 1,042.88 110.2 9.52 1,052.41 191.41 1,038.16 14.25 164.93 191.41 16.54 14.25 164.93 70.00 94.93 164.93 14.25 1,038.16 0.00 0.00 1,038.16 194.54 164.93
1979/1/14 1979 1 14 1/14 194.54 1,038.16 124.2 10.73 1,048.89 191.28 1,033.44 15.45 178.78 191.28 16.53 15.45 178.78 70.00 108.78 178.78 15.45 1,033.44 0.00 0.00 1,033.44 194.24 178.78
1979/1/15 1979 1 15 1/15 194.24 1,033.44 101.5 8.77 1,042.21 191.14 1,028.74 13.47 155.92 191.14 16.51 13.47 155.92 70.00 85.92 155.92 13.47 1,028.74 0.00 0.00 1,028.74 193.94 155.92
1979/1/16 1979 1 16 1/16 193.94 1,028.74 94.7 8.18 1,036.92 191.01 1,024.04 12.87 149.00 191.01 16.50 12.87 149.00 70.00 79.00 149.00 12.87 1,024.04 0.00 0.00 1,024.04 193.64 149.00
1979/1/17 1979 1 17 1/17 193.64 1,024.04 102.9 8.89 1,032.94 190.88 1,019.36 13.58 157.15 190.88 16.49 13.58 157.15 70.00 87.15 157.15 13.58 1,019.36 0.00 0.00 1,019.36 193.35 157.15
1979/1/18 1979 1 18 1/18 193.35 1,019.36 102.3 8.84 1,028.20 190.75 1,014.69 13.51 156.37 190.75 16.48 13.51 156.37 70.00 86.37 156.37 13.51 1,014.69 0.00 0.00 1,014.69 193.07 156.37
1979/1/19 1979 1 19 1/19 193.07 1,014.69 104.1 8.99 1,023.68 190.61 1,010.02 13.65 158.03 190.61 16.47 13.65 158.03 70.00 88.03 158.03 13.65 1,010.02 0.00 0.00 1,010.02 192.79 158.03
1979/1/20 1979 1 20 1/20 192.79 1,010.02 105.2 9.09 1,019.11 190.48 1,005.37 13.74 159.02 190.48 16.46 13.74 159.02 70.00 89.02 159.02 13.74 1,005.37 0.00 0.00 1,005.37 192.52 159.02
1979/1/21 1979 1 21 1/21 192.52 1,005.37 93.9 8.11 1,013.48 190.35 1,000.73 12.75 147.58 190.35 16.45 12.75 147.58 70.00 77.58 147.58 12.75 1,000.73 0.00 0.00 1,000.73 192.25 147.58
1979/1/22 1979 1 22 1/22 192.25 1,000.73 90.7 7.84 1,008.57 190.22 996.10 12.47 144.31 190.22 16.43 12.47 144.31 70.00 74.31 144.31 12.47 996.10 0.00 0.00 996.10 191.99 144.31
1979/1/23 1979 1 23 1/23 191.99 996.10 91.1 7.87 1,003.97 190.08 991.48 12.49 144.55 190.08 16.42 12.49 144.55 70.00 74.55 144.55 12.49 991.48 0.00 0.00 991.48 191.73 144.55
1979/1/24 1979 1 24 1/24 191.73 991.48 90.5 7.82 999.30 189.95 986.87 12.43 143.85 189.95 16.41 12.43 143.85 70.00 73.85 143.85 12.43 986.87 0.00 0.00 986.87 191.48 143.85
1979/1/25 1979 1 25 1/25 191.48 986.87 110.5 9.55 996.42 189.82 982.27 14.14 163.71 189.82 16.40 14.14 163.71 70.00 93.71 163.71 14.14 982.27 0.00 0.00 982.27 191.23 163.71
1979/1/26 1979 1 26 1/26 191.23 982.27 217.5 18.79 1,001.07 189.69 977.69 23.38 270.63 189.69 16.39 23.38 270.63 70.00 200.63 270.63 23.38 977.69 0.00 0.00 977.69 190.98 270.63
1979/1/27 1979 1 27 1/27 190.98 977.69 124.5 10.75 988.44 189.55 973.11 15.33 177.44 189.55 16.38 15.33 177.44 70.00 107.44 177.44 15.33 973.11 0.00 0.00 973.11 190.74 177.44
1979/1/28 1979 1 28 1/28 190.74 973.11 113.0 9.76 982.87 189.42 968.54 14.33 165.81 189.42 16.37 14.33 165.81 70.00 95.81 165.81 14.33 968.54 0.00 0.00 968.54 190.51 165.81
1979/1/29 1979 1 29 1/29 190.51 968.54 99.1 8.57 977.11 189.29 963.99 13.12 151.86 189.29 16.35 13.12 151.86 70.00 81.86 151.86 13.12 963.99 0.00 0.00 963.99 190.28 151.86
1979/1/30 1979 1 30 1/30 190.28 963.99 100.4 8.68 972.66 189.16 959.44 13.22 153.04 189.16 16.34 13.22 153.04 70.00 83.04 153.04 13.22 959.44 0.00 0.00 959.44 190.05 153.04
1979/1/31 1979 1 31 1/31 190.05 959.44 110.6 9.55 969.00 189.02 954.91 14.09 163.06 189.02 16.33 14.09 163.06 70.00 93.06 163.06 14.09 954.91 0.00 0.00 954.91 189.83 163.06
1979/2/1 1979 2 1 2/1 189.83 954.91 90.8 7.84 962.75 188.89 950.38 12.37 143.14 188.89 16.32 12.37 143.14 70.00 73.14 143.14 12.37 950.38 0.00 0.00 950.38 189.61 143.14
1979/2/2 1979 2 2 2/2 189.61 950.38 122.1 10.55 960.93 188.76 945.87 15.06 174.34 188.76 16.31 15.06 174.34 70.00 104.34 174.34 15.06 945.87 0.00 0.00 945.87 189.40 174.34
1979/2/3 1979 2 3 2/3 189.40 945.87 105.0 9.07 954.95 188.63 941.37 13.58 157.15 188.63 16.30 13.58 157.15 70.00 87.15 157.15 13.58 941.37 0.00 0.00 941.37 189.19 157.15
1979/2/4 1979 2 4 2/4 189.19 941.37 94.8 8.19 949.56 188.49 936.88 12.68 146.78 188.49 16.29 12.68 146.78 70.00 76.78 146.78 12.68 936.88 0.00 0.00 936.88 188.98 146.78
1979/2/5 1979 2 5 2/5 188.98 936.88 100.6 8.70 945.57 188.36 932.40 13.18 152.51 188.36 16.27 13.18 152.51 70.00 82.51 152.51 13.18 932.40 0.00 0.00 932.40 188.78 152.51
Figure below shows the results of reservoir operation simulation at Magat Dam. Results of simulated
reservoir water level and operation rule curve are well fitted.
600 175
500 165
400 155
300
145
200
100 135
0 125
1983-Jan
1983-Jul
1984-Jan
1984-Jul
1985-Jan
1985-Jul
1986-Jan
1986-Jul
1987-Jan
1987-Jul
1988-Jan
1988-Jul
1989-Jan
1989-Jul
1990-Jan
1990-Jul
1991-Jan
1991-Jul
1992-Jan
1992-Jul
1993-Jan
1993-Jul
1994-Jan
1994-Jul
1995-Jan
1995-Jul
1996-Jan
1996-Jul
Obs.Inflow (m3/s) Obs.Total Outflow Calc. Total Outflow Obs.Res.WL (El.m) Calc. Res.WL (El.m) Operation Rule Curve (El.m)
600 175
500 165
400 155
300
145
200
100 135
0 125
1997-Jan
1997-Jul
1998-Jan
1998-Jul
1999-Jan
1999-Jul
2000-Jan
2000-Jul
2001-Jan
2001-Jul
2002-Jan
2002-Jul
2003-Jan
2003-Jul
2004-Jan
2004-Jul
2005-Jan
2005-Jul
2006-Jan
2006-Jul
2007-Jan
2007-Jul
2008-Jan
2008-Jul
2009-Jan
2009-Jul
2010-Jan
2010-Jul
Obs.Inflow (m3/s) Obs.Total Outflow Calc. Total Outflow Obs.Res.WL (El.m) Calc. Res.WL (El.m) Operation Rule Curve (El.m)
600 175
500 165
400 155
300
145
200
100 135
0 125
2011-Jan
2011-Jul
2012-Jan
2012-Jul
2013-Jan
2013-Jul
2014-Jan
2014-Jul
2015-Jan
2015-Jul
2016-Jan
2016-Jul
2017-Jan
2017-Jul
2018-Jan
2018-Jul
2019-Jan
2019-Jul
2020-Jan
2020-Jul
Obs.Inflow (m3/s) Obs.Total Outflow Calc. Total Outflow Obs.Res.WL (El.m) Calc. Res.WL (El.m) Operation Rule Curve (El.m)
Itogon, Benguet. A gated spillway protects the dam from overtopping. Each wet season, the run-off is
stored for later release via water turbines to generate power and irrigate crops.
Agno River is the third largest river in the Philippines with a total length of 221 kilometers and a drainage
basin at the Project site of 1,225 square kilometers. The river originates in the Cordillera Mountains,
initially flows from north to south, divides into several channels in the flat central plain of Luzon and
meanders westerly through the provinces of Pangasinan and Tarlac before emptying into the Lingayen
Gulf. The dam and its immediate river basin are protected as a forest reserve known as the Lower Agno
Watershed Forest Reserve.
Ownership of the dam and spillway was transferred to National Power Corporation (NPC) upon
construction completion, as it contributed funds for the non-power components on behalf of several
agencies. SRPC will own and operate the power generating facilities for 25 years, after which their
ownership transfers to NPC.3
The San_Roque Dam reservoir operation records from 2003 to 2010 were collected from NPC as shown
in Figure below.
3
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Roque_Dam_(Philippines)
300 300
290
200
260
150 250
240
100 230
50 220
210
0 200
2003/1/1
2004/1/1
2005/1/1
2006/1/1
2007/1/1
2008/1/1
2009/1/1
2010/1/1
2011/1/1
2012/1/1
Inflow Total Outflow RWL Operation Rule Curve
Source: NPC
Figure D-67 Reservoir Operation Records at San_Roque Dam from 2003 to 2010
The mean monthly water level, mean monthly inflow and outflow at San_Roque Dam is shown in Figure
below.
800 280
700 270
600
Discharge (m3/s)
260
500
RWL (El.m)
250
400
240
300
230
200
100 220
0 210
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Operation Record of San Roque Dam by NPC.
Figure D-68 Mean Monthly Water Level and Inflow and Outflow at San Roque Dam
Assumed reservoir capacity curve (H-V-A curve) of San Roque Dam reservoir is shown in Figure below.
V-H
285
y= -5E-05x2 + 0.1049x + 225
R² = 1
275
RWL (El.m)
265
255
245
235
225
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200
Volume (MCM)
Figure D-69 Assumed Reservoir Capacity Curve (H-V Curve) of San Roque Dam
Using above H-V curve, reservoir operation rule curve and operation records, reservoir operation
simulation model was created as shown in Table below.
Table D-22 Reservoir Operation Simulation Model for San Roque Dam
River Maintenance Flow = 100% 2.25 26.05 35%
San Roque Dam Reservoir Operation Simulation
Date Year Month Day Date Reservoir Reservoir Obs. from U/S Inflow Inflow (temp) Operation Operation Rule Curve Rule Curve Average Average Obs. Actual Actual Final Final Total
WL Storage Inflow Tank Discharge Discharge Storage Rule Curve Rule Curve Outflow Outflow Outflow Outflow Outflow Outflow Outflow Storage RWL Outflow
(El.m) (MCM) (m3/s) (m3/s) (m3/s) (MCM) (MCM) (El.m) (MCM) (MCM) (m3/s) (m3/s) (MCM) (m3/s) (m3/s) (MCM) (MCM) (El.m) (m3/s)
1979/1/1 1979 1 1 1/1 270.25 654.26 27.18 27.18 2.35 656.61 270.25 654.26 2.35 27.18 51.13 4.42 27.18 2.35 654.26 272.23 27.18
1979/1/2 1979 1 2 1/2 272.23 654.26 31.67 31.67 2.74 657.00 270.08 649.06 7.94 91.89 52.78 4.56 91.89 7.94 649.06 272.02 91.89
1979/1/3 1979 1 3 1/3 272.02 649.06 37.31 37.31 3.22 652.29 269.93 644.40 7.88 91.23 52.47 4.53 91.23 7.88 644.40 271.84 91.23
1979/1/4 1979 1 4 1/4 271.84 644.40 23.68 23.68 2.05 646.45 269.78 639.61 6.84 79.18 51.55 4.45 79.18 6.84 639.61 271.64 79.18
1979/1/5 1979 1 5 1/5 271.64 639.61 25.11 25.11 2.17 641.78 269.61 634.40 7.38 85.36 47.53 4.11 85.36 7.38 634.40 271.43 85.36
1979/1/6 1979 1 6 1/6 271.43 634.40 28.88 28.88 2.50 636.90 269.47 630.28 6.61 76.55 48.74 4.21 76.55 6.61 630.28 271.25 76.55
1979/1/7 1979 1 7 1/7 271.25 630.28 29.25 29.25 2.53 632.81 269.32 625.63 7.18 83.09 52.64 4.55 83.09 7.18 625.63 271.06 83.09
1979/1/8 1979 1 8 1/8 271.06 625.63 32.30 32.30 2.79 628.42 269.14 620.18 8.24 95.39 50.81 4.39 95.39 8.24 620.18 270.83 95.39
1979/1/9 1979 1 9 1/9 270.83 620.18 32.25 32.25 2.79 622.97 268.97 615.27 7.70 89.14 50.00 4.32 89.14 7.70 615.27 270.61 89.14
1979/1/10 1979 1 10 1/10 270.61 615.27 35.09 35.09 3.03 618.30 268.85 611.39 6.91 79.96 52.93 4.57 79.96 6.91 611.39 270.44 79.96
1979/1/11 1979 1 11 1/11 270.44 611.39 29.19 29.19 2.52 613.91 268.51 601.41 12.50 144.70 50.23 4.34 144.70 12.50 601.41 270.00 144.70
1979/1/12 1979 1 12 1/12 270.00 601.41 30.42 30.42 2.63 604.04 268.36 597.01 7.02 81.30 50.40 4.35 81.30 7.02 597.01 269.81 81.30
1979/1/13 1979 1 13 1/13 269.81 597.01 29.55 29.55 2.55 599.57 268.23 593.14 6.43 74.43 44.54 3.85 74.43 6.43 593.14 269.63 74.43
1979/1/14 1979 1 14 1/14 269.63 593.14 26.15 26.15 2.26 595.40 268.11 589.60 5.80 67.13 44.06 3.81 67.13 5.80 589.60 269.47 67.13
1979/1/15 1979 1 15 1/15 269.47 589.60 25.07 25.07 2.17 591.76 267.97 585.39 6.37 73.75 46.71 4.04 73.75 6.37 585.39 269.27 73.75
1979/1/16 1979 1 16 1/16 269.27 585.39 22.35 22.35 1.93 587.32 267.77 579.53 7.79 90.14 49.09 4.24 90.14 7.79 579.53 269.00 90.14
1979/1/17 1979 1 17 1/17 269.00 579.53 24.10 24.10 2.08 581.62 267.58 574.03 7.59 87.85 50.35 4.35 87.85 7.59 574.03 268.74 87.85
1979/1/18 1979 1 18 1/18 268.74 574.03 24.01 24.01 2.07 576.10 267.36 567.50 8.60 99.51 55.20 4.77 99.51 8.60 567.50 268.43 99.51
1979/1/19 1979 1 19 1/19 268.43 567.50 27.27 27.27 2.36 569.86 267.10 560.01 9.85 113.98 60.33 5.21 113.98 9.85 560.01 268.06 113.98
1979/1/20 1979 1 20 1/20 268.06 560.01 30.81 30.81 2.66 562.67 266.84 552.80 9.88 114.30 63.45 5.48 114.30 9.88 552.80 267.71 114.30
1979/1/21 1979 1 21 1/21 267.71 552.80 24.01 24.01 2.07 554.87 266.59 545.63 9.24 106.96 58.58 5.06 106.96 9.24 545.63 267.35 106.96
1979/1/22 1979 1 22 1/22 267.35 545.63 24.91 24.91 2.15 547.78 266.33 538.26 9.53 110.26 58.50 5.05 110.26 9.53 538.26 266.98 110.26
1979/1/23 1979 1 23 1/23 266.98 538.26 22.70 22.70 1.96 540.22 266.06 530.63 9.59 111.02 58.20 5.03 111.02 9.59 530.63 266.58 111.02
1979/1/24 1979 1 24 1/24 266.58 530.63 22.55 22.55 1.95 532.57 265.78 522.94 9.64 111.54 62.85 5.43 111.54 9.64 522.94 266.18 111.54
1979/1/25 1979 1 25 1/25 266.18 522.94 24.83 24.83 2.15 525.08 265.46 514.04 11.04 127.82 57.89 5.00 127.82 11.04 514.04 265.71 127.82
1979/1/26 1979 1 26 1/26 265.71 514.04 31.87 31.87 2.75 516.79 265.19 506.61 10.18 117.87 57.36 4.96 117.87 10.18 506.61 265.31 117.87
1979/1/27 1979 1 27 1/27 265.31 506.61 27.53 27.53 2.38 508.99 264.94 499.86 9.13 105.69 50.20 4.34 105.69 9.13 499.86 264.94 105.69
1979/1/28 1979 1 28 1/28 264.94 499.86 31.28 31.28 2.70 502.56 264.75 494.69 7.87 91.12 55.56 4.80 91.12 7.87 494.69 264.66 91.12
1979/1/29 1979 1 29 1/29 264.66 494.69 29.00 29.00 2.51 497.19 264.52 488.39 8.80 101.89 56.09 4.85 101.89 8.80 488.39 264.31 101.89
1979/1/30 1979 1 30 1/30 264.31 488.39 23.58 23.58 2.04 490.43 264.26 481.62 8.80 101.87 58.02 5.01 101.87 8.80 481.62 263.92 101.87
1979/1/31 1979 1 31 1/31 263.92 481.62 32.42 32.42 2.80 484.43 264.00 474.56 9.86 114.13 56.66 4.90 114.13 9.86 474.56 263.52 114.13
1979/2/1 1979 2 1 2/1 263.52 474.56 23.28 23.28 2.01 476.58 263.73 467.48 9.10 105.31 57.49 4.97 105.31 9.10 467.48 263.11 105.31
1979/2/2 1979 2 2 2/2 263.11 467.48 26.28 26.28 2.27 469.75 263.45 460.23 9.51 110.11 60.94 5.27 110.11 9.51 460.23 262.69 110.11
1979/2/3 1979 2 3 2/3 262.69 460.23 31.94 31.94 2.76 462.99 263.18 453.10 9.89 114.52 62.38 5.39 114.52 9.89 453.10 262.27 114.52
1979/2/4 1979 2 4 2/4 262.27 453.10 23.27 23.27 2.01 455.11 262.88 445.53 9.58 110.84 55.30 4.78 110.84 9.58 445.53 261.81 110.84
1979/2/5 1979 2 5 2/5 261.81 445.53 25.11 25.11 2.17 447.70 262.63 439.00 8.71 100.76 56.63 4.89 100.76 8.71 439.00 261.41 100.76
1979/2/6 1979 2 6 2/6 261.41 439.00 30.95 30.95 2.67 441.67 262.33 431.40 10.27 118.90 54.67 4.72 118.90 10.27 431.40 260.95 118.90
Figure below shows the results of reservoir operation simulation at San Roque Dam. Results of
simulated reservoir water level and operation rule curve are well fitted.
300 290
200 260
250
150
240
100 230
220
50
210
0 200
2003/1/1
2004/1/1
2005/1/1
2006/1/1
2007/1/1
2008/1/1
2009/1/1
2010/1/1
2011/1/1
2012/1/1
Obs.Inflow Obs.Total Outflow Simulated Total Outflow Obs.RWL (El.m) Simulated RWL (El.m) Operation Rule Curve
Figure D-70 Observed and Simulated Reservoir Operation at San Roque Dam
water requirements for Metro Manila through the facilities of the Angat Dam
Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System and it irrigates about 28,000 hectares of farmland in
the provinces of Bulacan and Pampanga.
It has three gates opening a total of 1.5 meters to gradually release water that had accumulated due to
incessant rains during typhoons.
In comparison, Ipo Dam, located downstream of Angat dam, has three gates and 100.8 meters as its
normal high water level (NHWL). Ambuklao dam on the other hand, has two gates with NHWL at 752
meters. Binga dam which sits downstream from Ambuklao has three gates and NHWL at 575 meters.
San Roque dam, which was receiving water from Ambuklao and Binga, has NHWL at 280 meters.
Angat Dam supplies potable water and energy to Metro Manila and nearby areas. Tourists also visit the
dam for fishing, boating and hunting.
In the early 1990s, the Philippine government and Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System
studied tapping the Umiray River basin in General Nakar, Quezon as an additional source for the Angat
Dam Reservoir, as the growing population of Metro Manila pushed the demand for potable water up.
This has lead to the Umiray-Angat Transbasin Project (UATP), which began in July 1995 completed in
June 2000 with a total cost of PhP 4 billion. The UATP involved constructing a 13 km 4.3 meter diameter
diversion tunnel which channeled the headwaters of Umiray River at its intake point to Macua, in Doña
Remedios Trinidad, Bulacan, providing additional of 300 mld to the Angat Dam Reservoir.
As of 2010, Angat Dam is providing 4,000 million liters a day (mld) out of a demand of 4,395 mld, and
this is to grow to 5.054 mld in 2015, and 4,680 mld in 2020. Successive administration have already
pushed for additional sources, such as the Laiban Dam, Kaliwa Low Dam, and Kanan Dam.4
4
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angat_Dam
The Angat Dam reservoir operation records of reservoir water level and the operation rule curve from
2010 to 2012 were collected from MWSS as shown in Figure below.
210
Reservoir Water Level (El.m)
177
Reservoir Volume (MCM)
200
190
173
180
Reservoir WL (El.m)
170 Upper Operation Rule Curve (El.m) 169
Lower Operation Rule Curve (El.m)
160 Reservoir Volme (MCM)
150 165
2010/10/1
2010/11/1
2010/12/1
2011/10/1
2011/11/1
2011/12/1
2012/10/1
2012/11/1
2012/12/1
2010/3/1
2010/4/1
2010/5/1
2010/6/1
2010/7/1
2010/8/1
2010/9/1
2011/1/1
2011/2/1
2011/3/1
2011/4/1
2011/5/1
2011/6/1
2011/7/1
2011/8/1
2011/9/1
2012/1/1
2012/2/1
2012/3/1
2012/4/1
2012/5/1
2012/6/1
2012/7/1
2012/8/1
2012/9/1
Source: MWSS
Figure D-71 Reservoir Operation Records at Angat Dam from 2010 to 2012
Daily inflow and outflow records at Angat Dam is shown in Figure below.
140 200.00
120
150.00
100
80
100.00
60
40 50.00
20
0 -
2010/Jul
2011/Jul
2012/Jul
2010/Oct
2011/Oct
2012/Oct
2010/Apr
2010/Sep
2011/Apr
2011/Sep
2012/Feb
2012/Apr
2012/Sep
2010/Jun
2010/Aug
2010/Nov
2011/Feb
2011/Jun
2011/Aug
2011/Nov
2012/Jun
2012/Aug
2012/Nov
2010/May
2011/May
2012/May
2010/Mar
2011/Mar
2012/Mar
2010/Dec
2011/Jan
2011/Dec
2012/Jan
2012/Dec
Obs.Inflow Reservoir WL (El.m) Obs.Total Outflow
Source: MWSS.
Figure D-72 Daily Inflow and Outflow at Angat Dam
Assumed reservoir capacity curve (H-V-A curve) of Angat Dam reservoir is shown in Figure below.
220
Reservoir Water Level (El.m)
200
180
160
y = 2E-07x3 - 0.0003x2 + 0.235x + 138.61
R² = 0.9968
140
120
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Figure D-73 Assumed Reservoir Capacity Curve (H-V Curve) of Angat Dam
Using above H-V curve, reservoir operation rule curve and operation records, reservoir operation
simulation model was created as shown in Table below.
Table D-23 Reservoir Operation Simulation Model for Angat Dam
138.6 138.61 Spill Out El.m (Wet Season)= 210.00 1,141.6
135.3 135.33 Spill Out El.m (Dry Season)= 210.00 1,141.6
Reservoir (Temp) Inflow Inflow Total Inflow Inflow (Temp) Operation Operation Design Design Outflow Outflow Sub-Total Sub-Total (Temp) Spill Out Spill Out (Final) (Final) Total Total Total
Water Level Res.Vol. UMIRAY ANGAT Discharge Volume Res.Vol. Rule Curve Rule Curve Outflow Outflow MWSS NIA Outflow Outflow Res.Volume Volume Discharge Res.Volume Res.WL. Outflow Outflow (NIA) Outflow
Date (MWSS) (MWSS+NIA)
(El.m) (MCM) (m3/s) (m3/s) (m3/s) (MCM) (MCM) (El.m) (MCM) (MCM) (m3/s) (m3/s) (m3/s) (m3/s) (MCM) (MCM) (MCM) (m3/s) (MCM) (El.m) (m3/s) (m3/s) (m3/s)
1979/1/1 211.86 747.2 9.65 62.14 71.79 6.20 753.42 209.51 698.2 55.23 639.26 354.50 284.76 639.26 55.23 698.19 0.00 0.00 698.19 209.51 354.50 284.76 639.26
1979/1/2 209.51 698.2 9.24 57.22 66.45 5.74 703.93 209.37 695.4 8.55 98.93 55.76 43.17 98.93 8.55 695.38 0.00 0.00 695.38 209.37 55.76 43.17 98.93
1979/1/3 209.37 695.4 8.21 62.82 71.03 6.14 701.52 209.23 692.6 8.94 103.52 51.81 51.70 103.52 8.94 692.58 0.00 0.00 692.58 209.23 51.81 51.70 103.52
1979/1/4 209.23 692.6 20.40 91.02 111.42 9.63 702.20 209.09 689.8 12.43 143.90 68.90 75.00 143.90 12.43 689.77 0.00 0.00 689.77 209.09 68.90 75.00 143.90
1979/1/5 209.09 689.8 20.14 85.82 105.95 9.15 698.93 208.95 687.0 11.96 138.43 63.23 75.20 138.43 11.96 686.96 0.00 0.00 686.96 208.95 63.23 75.20 138.43
1979/1/6 208.95 687.0 18.90 59.15 78.05 6.74 693.71 208.81 684.2 9.55 110.53 52.84 57.69 110.53 9.55 684.16 0.00 0.00 684.16 208.81 52.84 57.69 110.53
1979/1/7 208.81 684.2 17.76 58.89 76.65 6.62 690.78 208.67 681.4 9.43 109.13 51.52 57.61 109.13 9.43 681.35 0.00 0.00 681.35 208.67 51.52 57.61 109.13
1979/1/8 208.67 681.4 28.07 63.79 91.87 7.94 689.29 208.53 678.8 10.50 121.54 56.81 64.73 121.54 10.50 678.79 0.00 0.00 678.79 208.53 56.81 64.73 121.54
1979/1/9 208.53 678.8 22.62 79.91 102.53 8.86 687.65 208.39 676.4 11.20 129.60 60.74 68.85 129.60 11.20 676.45 0.00 0.00 676.45 208.39 60.74 68.85 129.60
1979/1/10 208.39 676.4 19.08 106.65 125.73 10.86 687.31 208.25 674.1 13.20 152.79 71.38 81.41 152.79 13.20 674.11 0.00 0.00 674.11 208.25 71.38 81.41 152.79
1979/1/11 208.25 674.1 20.45 104.39 124.84 10.79 684.90 208.11 671.8 13.12 151.91 66.63 85.28 151.91 13.12 671.77 0.00 0.00 671.77 208.11 66.63 85.28 151.91
1979/1/12 208.11 671.8 18.04 62.70 80.74 6.98 678.75 207.97 669.3 9.43 109.12 38.85 70.27 109.12 9.43 669.32 0.00 0.00 669.32 207.97 38.85 70.27 109.12
1979/1/13 207.97 669.3 17.04 61.17 78.22 6.76 676.08 207.83 666.5 9.56 110.70 41.85 68.85 110.70 9.56 666.51 0.00 0.00 666.51 207.83 41.85 68.85 110.70
1979/1/14 207.83 666.5 18.84 54.50 73.34 6.34 672.85 207.69 663.7 9.14 105.82 49.52 56.30 105.82 9.14 663.71 0.00 0.00 663.71 207.69 49.52 56.30 105.82
1979/1/15 207.69 663.7 19.58 77.24 96.82 8.36 672.07 207.55 660.9 11.17 129.30 48.16 81.14 129.30 11.17 660.90 0.00 0.00 660.90 207.55 48.16 81.14 129.30
1979/1/16 207.55 660.9 20.02 35.54 55.56 4.80 665.70 207.40 658.1 7.61 88.04 41.07 46.97 88.04 7.61 658.09 0.00 0.00 658.09 207.40 41.07 46.97 88.04
1979/1/17 207.40 658.1 19.39 48.76 68.15 5.89 663.98 207.26 655.3 8.69 100.63 71.45 29.18 100.63 8.69 655.29 0.00 0.00 655.29 207.26 71.45 29.18 100.63
1979/1/18 207.26 655.3 10.89 38.15 49.04 4.24 659.52 207.12 652.5 7.04 81.52 46.90 34.62 81.52 7.04 652.48 0.00 0.00 652.48 207.12 46.90 34.62 81.52
1979/1/19 207.12 652.5 19.08 48.26 67.34 5.82 658.30 206.98 649.7 8.62 99.82 50.26 49.56 99.82 8.62 649.67 0.00 0.00 649.67 206.98 50.26 49.56 99.82
1979/1/20 206.98 649.7 18.54 56.11 74.65 6.45 656.12 206.84 646.9 9.26 107.13 54.12 53.01 107.13 9.26 646.87 0.00 0.00 646.87 206.84 54.12 53.01 107.13
1979/1/21 206.84 646.9 17.28 60.19 77.47 6.69 653.56 206.70 644.1 9.50 109.95 55.91 54.05 109.95 9.50 644.06 0.00 0.00 644.06 206.70 55.91 54.05 109.95
1979/1/22 206.70 644.1 16.89 39.26 56.16 4.85 648.91 206.56 641.3 7.66 88.64 42.87 45.77 88.64 7.66 641.26 0.00 0.00 641.26 206.56 42.87 45.77 88.64
1979/1/23 206.56 641.3 17.50 50.96 68.46 5.91 647.17 206.42 638.4 8.72 100.94 49.89 51.06 100.94 8.72 638.45 0.00 0.00 638.45 206.42 49.89 51.06 100.94
1979/1/24 206.42 638.4 19.26 56.86 76.12 6.58 645.03 206.28 635.6 9.38 108.60 53.93 54.67 108.60 9.38 635.64 0.00 0.00 635.64 206.28 53.93 54.67 108.60
1979/1/25 206.28 635.6 13.60 69.80 83.40 7.21 642.85 206.14 632.8 10.01 115.88 56.54 59.35 115.88 10.01 632.84 0.00 0.00 632.84 206.14 56.54 59.35 115.88
1979/1/26 206.14 632.8 17.54 55.01 72.55 6.27 639.10 206.00 630.0 9.07 105.03 51.10 53.93 105.03 9.07 630.03 0.00 0.00 630.03 206.00 51.10 53.93 105.03
1979/1/27 206.00 630.0 17.58 56.58 74.17 6.41 636.44 205.86 627.2 9.21 106.65 51.59 55.06 106.65 9.21 627.22 0.00 0.00 627.22 205.86 51.59 55.06 106.65
1979/1/28 205.86 627.2 17.51 48.59 66.10 5.71 632.93 205.72 624.4 8.52 98.59 47.56 51.03 98.59 8.52 624.42 0.00 0.00 624.42 205.72 47.56 51.03 98.59
1979/1/29 205.72 624.4 17.68 44.01 61.70 5.33 629.75 205.58 621.6 8.14 94.18 44.66 49.52 94.18 8.14 621.61 0.00 0.00 621.61 205.58 44.66 49.52 94.18
1979/1/30 205.58 621.6 11.33 37.33 48.66 4.20 625.81 205.44 618.8 7.01 81.15 39.64 41.51 81.15 7.01 618.80 0.00 0.00 618.80 205.44 39.64 41.51 81.15
Figure below shows the results of reservoir operation simulation at Angat Dam. Results of simulated
reservoir water level and operation rule curve are well fitted. The observed outflow and simulated
outflow are also fitted.
200 220
140 200
120
190
100
180
80
60 170
40
160
20
0 150
2010/May
2011/May
2012/May
2010/Apr
2010/Jun
2011/Apr
2010/Jul
2010/Aug
2010/Nov
2011/Jun
2012/Apr
2011/Jul
2011/Aug
2011/Nov
2012/Jun
2012/Jul
2012/Aug
2012/Nov
2010/Mar
2010/Sep
2011/Feb
2011/Mar
2011/Sep
2012/Feb
2012/Mar
2012/Sep
2010/Oct
2010/Dec
2011/Jan
2011/Oct
2011/Dec
2012/Jan
2012/Oct
2012/Dec
Obs.Total Inflow Obs.Total Outflow Simulated Total Outflow Obs.Res.WL (Elm) Simulatd Res.WL (El.m) Operation Rule Curve
5
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantabangan_Dam
Daily reservoir operation records of reservoir water level and the operation rule curve at Pantabangan
Dam from 2019 to 2020 were collected from NIA as shown in Figure below. Monthly reservoir
operation records from 2010 to 2018 were also collected form NIA.
1,800
Reservoir Water Level (El.m)
220
1,600
Reservoir Volume (MCM)
1,400
210
1,200
200 1,000
800
190
600
Reservoir WL (El.m)
400
180 Operation Rule Curve (ORC) (El.m)
Reservoir Volume (MCM) 200
170 0
2019/Mar
2020/Mar
2019/Apr
2019/Jul
2020/Apr
2020/Jul
2019/Jun
2019/Aug
2019/Nov
2020/Jun
2020/Aug
2020/Nov
2019/Feb
2019/May
2019/Sep
2020/Feb
2020/May
2020/Sep
2019/Oct
2020/Oct
2019/Jan
2019/Dec
2020/Jan
2020/Dec
Source: NIA
Figure D-75 Reservoir Operation Records at Pantabangan Dam from 2019 to 2020
Daily inflow and outflow records at Pantabangan Dam is shown in Figure below.
210
600
500 200
400
190
300
200
180
100
0 170
2019/Mar
2020/Mar
2019/Apr
2019/Jul
2020/Apr
2020/Jul
2019/Jun
2019/Aug
2019/Nov
2020/Jun
2020/Aug
2020/Nov
2019/Feb
2019/May
2019/Sep
2020/Feb
2020/May
2020/Sep
2019/Oct
2020/Oct
2019/Jan
2019/Dec
2020/Jan
2020/Dec
Source: NIA.
Figure D-76 Daily Inflow and Outflow at Pantabangan Dam
Assumed reservoir capacity curve (H-V-A curve) of Pantabangan Dam reservoir is shown in Figure
below.
220
uReservoir Water Level (El.m)
210
200
190
y = 5E-09x3 - 2E-05x2 + 0.0451x + 172.43
R² = 0.9969
180
170
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500
Reservoir Volume (MCM)
Figure D-77 Assumed Reservoir Capacity Curve (H-V Curve) of Pantabangan Dam
Using above H-V curve, reservoir operation rule curve and operation records, reservoir operation
simulation model was created as shown in Table below.
Figure below shows the results of reservoir operation simulation at Pantabangan Dam. Results of
simulated reservoir water level and operation rule curve are well fitted. The observed outflow and
simulated outflow are also fitted.
350 220
Discharge (m3/s)
300 210
250
200 200
150 190
100
180
50
0 170
2019/Apr
2019/Jun
2019/Jul
2019/Aug
2019/Nov
2020/Apr
2020/Jun
2020/Jul
2020/Aug
2020/Nov
2019/Feb
2019/Mar
2019/May
2019/Sep
2020/Feb
2020/Mar
2020/May
2020/Sep
2019/Jan
2019/Oct
2019/Dec
2020/Jan
2020/Oct
2020/Dec
Average 2,554 5,564 958 2,365 28,179 7,607 2.19 0.37 0.93 10.27 2.86
Max. 3,479 7,195 2,902 5,447 61,214 9,657 2.76 0.99 1.97 23.09 3.81
Min. 1,842 4,167 305 482 1,300 3,914 1.70 0.14 0.22 0.65 1.69
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Table D-26 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-II, Cagayan River
Basin
Runoff Coefficient
BAGAB BAMBA LAGAW Ozcariz, Ozcariz, Ozcariz, 0.000 Cabulay, Cabaruan, Tongngod Lamo, Baliling, Bante, llut, Carab, Bagabag Beti, Pingkian, Rosario, Upi, Larion Buenavist Alinginga Ambato, Minanga, Cabaruan, Dulao, Gabong San Jose, Bumagcat Malama, Dipantan, Palacian, Lamo, Poblacion Bagumba Centro Nassiping Mabini, Dibibi, Dumanisi, Gamis, Camarag, Tupaya, Maria Buag, Larion Pinukpuk Ipil, Aurora Camarag, Baretbet,
AG NG E Ramon Ramon Ramon Santiago Maddela . Lagawe Dupax Sta. Fe Bambang Cordon Bagabag Aritao Kayapa Diadi Gamu Alto, a, Sta, n Tiglayan San Maddela Lagawe Rodriguez , Tayum, Conner Nagtipun Aglipay Dupax , Banaue yan, Jones , Gattaran Santiago Cabarrog Diffun Saguday San Isidro Lagawe Clara, Bambang Alto, -Junction, Echague East, San Isidro Bagabag
del Norte, Tuguegar Maria II,Ilagan, Mariano Abra an, del Norte Dupax uis Diffun Tuguegar Pinukpuk, Diffun
Nueva ao lsabela Isabela del Sur ao Kalinga-
Vizcaya Apayao
1979 0.03 3.12 0.42 0.42 0.56 0.74 0.40
1980 2.70 0.79 0.25 0.31 0.67 0.45
1981 0.86 0.42 0.53 1.07 0.58
1982 0.80 0.29 0.46 0.89 0.49 0.97
1983 0.40 0.44 0.08 0.16 0.65 0.23 0.32 0.46 1.11
1984 0.60 0.59 0.22 0.34 1.15 0.38 0.24 0.33 0.77 0.99
1985 0.57 0.56 1.42 0.15 0.72 0.11 0.42 0.89 0.37 0.46 0.60 0.58 0.47 1.11 1.37
1986 0.47 0.46 1.24 0.82 0.03 0.60 0.44 0.23 1.06 0.46 0.55 0.93 0.58 0.49 0.53 0.55 1.84 0.31 0.06
1987 0.42 0.42 0.17 0.59 1.96 0.35 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.30 0.82 0.51 0.69 0.72 0.48 0.20 1.33 0.42 0.61 0.52 0.26 0.86 0.10 0.96 0.48 0.51
1988 0.55 0.55 0.29 0.95 1.89 1.29 0.44 0.61 0.76 0.30 0.92 0.68 0.89 0.71 0.88 0.29 1.17 0.82 0.86 1.03 0.62 1.09 0.36 1.40 0.74 0.67
1989 0.54 0.55 0.79 0.29 1.10 0.29 1.20 0.51 0.61 1.02 0.84 0.27 0.31 0.71 0.61 0.91 0.27 0.29 0.26 0.74 0.63 0.35
1990 0.57 0.55 0.31 0.77 0.46 0.96 0.51 0.66 0.82 1.80 0.85 0.41 0.61 0.69 0.87 0.25 0.66 2.34 0.80 0.74 0.65 0.84
1991 0.35 0.38 0.25 0.82 0.32 1.03 0.50 0.66 0.86 2.44 0.22 0.58 0.60 0.66 0.61 0.20 0.35 0.70 0.06 0.83 0.51 0.97
1992 0.49 0.48 0.19 0.49 1.37 0.85 1.14 1.18 0.99 0.48 0.65 0.60 1.25 0.29 0.44 0.83 0.37 0.72 0.46 0.59
1993 0.68 0.68 0.27 0.52 1.35 0.67 0.82 1.07 1.53 0.37 1.63 0.92 0.68 1.71 0.42 0.64 0.78 0.48 1.64 0.58 0.48
1994 0.52 0.57 0.20 0.39 0.75 0.49 0.62 0.62 1.23 0.60 0.25 1.37 0.64 0.80 1.61 0.45 0.76 0.43 0.70 0.32 0.62 0.55
1995 0.66 0.63 0.24 0.70 1.10 0.51 0.61 0.91 2.28 0.83 0.39 1.22 1.05 0.75 1.61 0.75 1.41 0.71 0.69 2.08 0.74 0.67
1996 0.53 0.52 0.17 0.34 1.83 0.62 0.80 1.56 0.65 0.41 0.20 0.62 0.71 1.11 0.62 0.40 0.22 2.00 0.56 0.48
1997 0.56 0.59 0.14 0.32 1.20 0.58 0.73 1.05 0.42 0.39 0.32 0.51 0.66 1.03 0.26 0.08 1.14 0.44 0.68
1998 0.57 0.49 0.07 1.13 0.67 0.92 0.98 0.62 0.08 0.39 0.96 0.51 0.95 0.59 0.70 0.51 1.82 0.50 0.31
1999 0.51 0.46 0.74 0.36 0.82 0.50 1.24 0.29 0.30 1.26 0.46 0.42
2000 0.58 0.53 0.95 0.54 0.46 0.93 0.55 1.04 0.31 0.24 1.07 0.54 0.26 0.81
2001 0.54 0.48 0.80 0.38 0.85 0.31 0.76 0.96 1.09 0.32 1.44 0.21 1.11 0.23 0.62 0.39 0.80
2002 0.43 0.39 0.03 0.26 0.65 0.60 0.79 0.21 1.22 15.62 0.94 0.93 0.18 0.51
2003 0.40 0.32 0.85 0.34 0.77 0.80 1.14 0.31 1.25 17.14 0.90 0.95 0.27
2004 0.36 0.31 0.69 1.84 0.36 1.15 0.80 1.06 0.40 1.20 0.83 0.43 0.61 3.82
2005 0.53 0.51 0.75 1.75 3.01 0.44 1.14 1.60 0.80 1.25 0.35 0.94 0.69 0.52 1.06 0.37
2006 0.69 0.69 0.71 2.58 2.91 0.59 1.44 1.61 0.48 1.16 1.66 0.70 1.30 0.88 1.29 0.57
2007 0.50 0.50 2.04 3.04 0.29 0.92 0.98 0.53 0.71 1.12 0.61 0.89 0.11 0.98 0.50
2008 1.90 54.59 3.49 0.52 0.53 2.78 3.04 0.36 1.01 0.80 0.32 1.01 1.34 0.19 1.18 0.21 1.01 0.56
2009 1.99 58.48 5.20 0.64 0.66 3.17 0.54 1.00 1.17 0.24 1.02 1.20 0.49 1.91 1.05 0.49 0.56
2010 0.92 3.61 0.54 0.46 0.15 1.19 0.43 1.04 4.13 0.36 0.52 0.23 0.64 0.21 0.45 0.94 0.49 0.51
2011 1.57 5.99 0.65 0.61 0.40 0.99 0.55 1.37 3.21 0.49 0.39 1.35 0.33 1.67
2012 0.37 3.34 0.68 0.77 0.39 1.01 0.11 0.19 0.81 0.96 0.35
2013 0.43 0.34 0.69 0.37 0.18 0.44 0.50
2014 0.02 0.05 0.34 1.47 0.44
2015 0.02 0.14 0.30 0.43 0.34 0.62
2016 0.02 0.71 0.09 0.87 9.27
2017 0.02 0.07 1.00
2018 0.01 0.06 67.72
2019
2020
Average 1.35 38.81 3.79 0.53 0.51 0.27 0.03 0.22 2.91 0.21 0.23 0.92 1.20 0.23 0.89 0.47 0.60 0.44 0.31 0.40 0.84 0.43 1.03 0.98 0.49 0.63 0.88 0.48 1.03 2.29 3.04 0.39 0.89 0.36 1.05 0.24 0.78 0.34 0.66 1.10 0.40 0.58 1.39 0.92 0.36 27.44 1.16 0.55 0.55 0.34 0.99 0.68
Max. 1.99 58.48 5.99 0.69 0.69 0.40 0.03 0.22 3.12 0.34 0.29 1.42 1.96 0.31 1.29 0.82 0.72 0.76 0.42 0.70 1.19 0.55 1.37 1.83 0.85 1.14 1.56 0.58 2.44 2.78 4.13 0.88 1.44 0.99 1.63 0.53 1.35 0.34 0.96 1.71 0.75 1.41 1.91 2.34 0.80 67.72 2.08 0.95 0.74 0.52 1.29 3.82
Min. 0.37 3.34 0.68 0.35 0.31 0.15 0.03 0.22 2.70 0.08 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.35 0.03 0.45 0.11 0.23 0.07 0.43 0.34 0.69 0.38 0.23 0.31 0.46 0.40 0.03 1.75 1.84 0.01 0.14 0.20 0.31 0.05 0.42 0.34 0.49 0.21 0.19 0.26 0.94 0.29 0.06 9.27 0.32 0.11 0.31 0.18 0.61 0.06
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Table D-27 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-II, Abulog River
Basin
Year Annual Annual Runoff (mm/year) Runoff Coefficient
Rainfall Abra Sinalang Gasgas Quiaoit Barren Lukban Pudtol Masi Nassiping Abra Sinalang Gasgas Quiaoit Barren Lukban Pudtol Masi Nassiping
1979 3,697
1980 3,584 1,241 0.35
1981 3,445 791 0.23
1982 2,434 482 0.20
1983 2,160 1,434 0.66
1984 3,107 2,001 0.64
1985 3,150 1,796 0.57
1986 3,671 651 0.18
1987 2,318
1988 3,013
1989 2,799
1990 2,994
1991 2,390 2,399 1.00
1992 2,750 3,168 1.15
1993 2,185 2,038 0.93
1994 2,319 2,218 0.96
1995 2,495 991 0.40
1996 2,977 2,023 0.68
1997 2,406 645 0.27
1998 2,990
1999 3,769
2000 3,195
2001 2,925 4,256 1.45
2002 2,236 171 3,542 1,863 2,558 2,130 3,516 0.08 1.58 0.83 1.14 0.95 1.57
2003 2,445 197 4,079 2,146 2,703 2,880 4,099 0.08 1.67 0.88 1.11 1.18 1.68
2004 2,385 283 5,855 3,080 19,723 3,188 5,857 0.12 2.46 1.29 8.27 1.34 2.46
2005 2,797 239 4,948 2,603 4,167 2,733 4,947 0.09 1.77 0.93 1.49 0.98 1.77
2006 2,475 200 4,133 2,174 5,982 2,830 4,085 0.08 1.67 0.88 2.42 1.14 1.65
2007 2,839 276 5,701 2,999 4,911 19,412 2,282 5,721 0.10 2.01 1.06 1.73 6.84 0.80 2.02
2008 3,024 274 5,669 2,982 7,195 3,951 3,086 5,701 0.09 1.87 0.99 2.38 1.31 1.02 1.88
2009 3,495 238 4,929 2,593 3,706 3,543 4,930 0.07 1.41 0.74 1.06 1.01 1.41
2010 2,747 225 4,651 2,446 1,118 2,170 4,629 0.08 1.69 0.89 0.41 0.79 1.68
2011 3,521 144 2,982 1,568 4,003 3,418 23 0.04 0.85 0.45 1.14 0.97 0.01
2012 2,699 123 2,547 1,340 5,447 2,401 0.05 0.94 0.50 2.02 0.89
2013 2,775 4,020 6,764 1.45 2.44
2014 2,041 2,369 2,125 6,375 629 1.16 1.04 3.12 0.31
2015 2,236 102,999 2,125 1,867 704 46.06 0.95 0.83 0.32
2016 2,922 2,615 3,544 1,193 0.89 1.21 0.41
2017 2,546 2,858 4 1.12 0.00
2018 2,300 4,067 1.77
2019 3,792 41 0.01
2020 2,806
Average 2,830 216 4,458 2,345 5,564 7,021 2,747 4,351 2,901 667 0.08 1.63 0.86 2.00 2.88 1.02 1.61 1.23 0.31
Max. 3,792 283 5,855 3,080 7,195 102,999 3,544 5,857 6,764 704 0.12 2.46 1.29 2.42 46.06 1.34 2.46 3.12 0.32
Min. 2,041 123 2,547 1,340 4,167 482 2,125 23 4 629 0.04 0.85 0.45 1.49 0.18 0.79 0.01 0.00 0.31
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Table D-28 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-III, Pampanga
River Basin
Station Mayapya Zaragoza Arayat Angat Pantanba Mexico Hacienda Balog- Sapang San SAN SAN CANDA SOLEDA Angat Sta. Rosa Sto.
Name p dam ngan dam Balog Buho Isidro MIGUEL RAFAEL BA D Domingo
Year - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1979 0.00 0.43 1.47 0.03 0.06 0.61 0.15
1980 0.00 1.50 0.80 0.10 0.00
1981 0.00 0.85 0.09
1982 0.45 0.00 0.49 0.45 0.10 0.46
1983 0.35 0.00 0.34 0.32 0.13 0.18
1984 0.38 0.00 0.39 1.08 0.51 0.13 0.40
1985 0.60 0.18 0.57 1.67 0.77 0.01 1.01 0.91 0.01 0.04 1.00
1986 0.41 0.40 0.60 0.16 1.58 0.60 0.67 0.71 0.48 0.51
1987 0.24 0.38 0.39 1.29 0.37 0.04 0.92 0.49 0.71 0.42 0.49 0.06
1988 0.25 1.37 0.44 1.69 0.57 0.52 0.56 0.44
1989 0.36 0.37 0.56 1.21 0.61 1.38 0.73 0.51 0.52 0.61
1990 0.47 0.60 0.56 1.36 0.84 1.63 0.56 0.53 0.86 0.48
1991 0.45 0.67 0.47 1.22 0.54 0.36 0.22 0.35 0.28
1992 0.41 0.57 0.51 1.33 0.65 1.86 1.19 0.67 0.91
1993 0.64 0.80 0.40 1.32 0.77 1.80 1.15 0.46
1994 0.33 0.74 0.47 1.14 0.57 0.92 0.59 0.22
1995 0.39 0.68 0.57 1.53 0.51 0.00 0.45 0.65
1996 0.12 0.65 0.47 1.23 0.45 1.29
1997 0.77 0.33 0.73 0.54 0.52 0.00
1998 0.47 0.57 1.25 0.77 1.81 1.52
1999 0.61 0.50 1.19 0.54 1.36 1.04
2000 0.26 0.61 1.27 0.63 0.04 2.26 0.69 0.36
2001 0.57 0.64 0.61 1.68 0.70 0.26 1.22 0.59 1.39 0.18
2002 0.37 0.66 0.07 1.49 0.87 0.23 0.80 0.51 0.41 0.83 0.31 0.48
2003 0.49 0.61 1.47 1.23 0.23 1.32 0.55 0.75 0.72 0.53 0.65
2004 0.58 0.71 1.01 0.25 1.06 0.77 0.67 0.24 0.46 0.56
2005 0.32 0.68 1.53 0.92 0.17 0.38 0.18 0.00 0.48
2006 0.56 0.66 1.26 1.15 0.34 0.57 0.42
2007 0.21 0.00 1.48 0.71 0.27 0.41
2008 1.33 0.82 0.31
2009 1.21 0.89 0.20
2010 0.93 0.80 0.27
2011 0.15
2012 0.13
2013 0.11 0.37
2014 0.11 8.31
2015 0.09 5.97
2016 0.06 6.90
2017 0.05 6.34
2018 0.04 2.66
2019
2020
Average 0.41 0.43 0.47 1.32 0.70 0.17 5.09 0.09 1.26 0.57 0.06 0.61 0.07 0.64 0.57 0.40 0.48
Mam. 0.64 0.80 0.61 1.68 1.23 0.34 8.31 0.16 2.26 1.19 0.06 0.61 0.15 1.52 1.39 0.61 1.00
Min. 0.12 0.00 0.07 0.73 0.32 0.00 0.37 0.01 0.36 0.18 0.06 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.06
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Table D-29 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-III, Agno River
Basin
Year Annual Rainfall Annual Runoff (mm/year) Runoff Coefficient
Sto. Rosario Villa Canding Sta. Pacalat San Roque Sto. Villa Canding Sta. Pacalat San Roque
Aglipay Barbara Dam Rosario Aglipay Barbara Dam
Tarlac Pangasinan Benguet Inflow Inflow
1979 1,957 2,092 2,789 2,033 1.04
1980 1,721 2,034 3,196 1,061 0.62
1981 1,955 1,825 2,431 1,126 0.58
1982 2,084 2,002 2,247 1,275 0.61
1983 1,386 1,454 1,812 940 477 1,462 0.68 0.33 1.01
1984 2,246 2,302 2,744 2,149 111 783 2,824 0.96 0.05 0.34 1.23
1985 2,373 2,371 2,841 19 1,500 1,069 9 0.01 0.63 0.45 0.00
1986 2,638 2,476 3,013 1,491 1,024 38 0.57 0.41 0.02
1987 1,592 1,565 2,315 1,033 1,024 40 0.65 0.65 0.03
1988 2,314 2,327 2,793 1,411 605 811 0.61 0.26 0.35
1989 2,320 2,443 3,163 1,782 1,168 806 0.77 0.48 0.33
1990 2,527 2,599 3,090 2,049 1,171 653 0.81 0.45 0.25
1991 2,256 2,034 2,439 945 607 0.46 0.30
1992 2,579 2,618 2,942 1,671 797 0.64 0.30
1993 1,937 2,009 2,415 1,964 1,163 0.98 0.58
1994 2,190 1,984 2,325 1,225 2,287 0.62 1.15
1995 2,107 2,028 2,328 1,646 829 0.81 0.41
1996 2,084 2,016 2,661 1,983 1,242 0.98 0.62
1997 2,116 2,096 2,632 1,702 604 0.81 0.29
1998 1,890 1,775 2,388 1,734 216 0.98 0.12
1999 3,278 3,079 3,733 2,407 962 0.78 0.31
2000 3,292 3,040 3,525 2,847 2,568 18 0.86 0.84 0.01
2001 2,122 2,051 2,763 374 1,683 280 0.18 0.82 0.14
2002 2,263 2,234 2,369 883 2,070 221 0.39 0.93 0.10
2003 2,306 2,485 2,874 1,275 2,963 521 2,045 0.55 1.19 0.21 0.89
2004 2,309 2,367 2,906 1,196 3,288 651 2,256 0.52 1.39 0.27 0.98
2005 1,878 1,858 2,484 971 2,535 808 2,333 0.52 1.36 0.43 1.24
2006 2,020 2,063 2,512 916 3,277 676 2,333 0.45 1.59 0.33 1.16
2007 2,249 2,264 2,940 1,737 1,717 0.77 0.76
2008 2,478 2,407 3,089 2,197 0.89
2009 3,035 3,096 3,894 3,121 1.03
2010 1,854 1,977 2,710 352 367 0.19 0.20
2011 2,994 2,790 3,177 356 0.12
2012 3,100 2,949 3,166
2013 2,577 2,496 3,091 334 0.13
2014 2,147 2,167 2,466 320 0.15
2015 2,178 2,355 2,691 320 0.15
2016 2,526 2,487 2,709 295 0.12
2017 2,174 2,048 2,753
2018 2,688 2,800 3,273
2019 2,455 2,331 3,072
2020 1,995 1,949 2,623
Average 2,290 2,270 2,795 633 1,431 1,340 1,709 772 2,046 #DIV/0! 0.29 0.67 0.58 0.77 0.37 0.89
Max. 3,292 3,096 3,894 1,275 2,847 2,049 3,288 2,824 3,121 0 0.55 1.04 0.81 1.59 1.23 1.24
Min. 1,386 1,454 1,812 295 19 111 477 9 367 0 0.12 0.01 0.05 0.26 0.00 0.20
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Table D-30 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-IV, Pasig-
Laguuna_de_Bay
Umiray
Agos SGS Wawa Famy/May San San San San San Pagsawita DACANL DUMAC MARAG PANAYS TIGNOA ABATA J.P. Rizal
Station Banugao San Jose Tunnel Porac San Jose Wawa Sto. Nino Riverside CULIAT PALICO Real St. San Roque Tumbaga
(Agus) Dam or Cristobal Lorenzo Rafael Lorenzo Cristobal n AO AA ONDON AYAN N N St.
Inflow
Agos DACANL DUMAC MARAG PANAYS
San San CULIAT PALICO TIGNOA ABATA LAGUNA SAN SARIAY
River Agos Mainstrea Marikina Marikina Mayor San Juan Pililia Marikina Marikina Marikina Marikina Nangka Pililia Sta. Cruz AO AA ONDON AYAN ZAPOTE
Cristobal Cristobal RIVER RIVER N RIVER N LAKE ROQUE A
m RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER
DACANL DUMAC MARAG PANAYS
Laguna CULIAT PALICO TIGNOA
Southern Southern San Laguna Laguna San AO AA ONDON AYAN ANTEQU LAGUNA SAN SARIAY
Basin Marikina Pasig Umiray Lake / Laguna Marikina Pasig Marikina Marikina Nangka - RIVER RIVER N RIVER ZAPOTE
Tagalog Tagalog Cristobal Lake Lake Cristobal RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER ERA LAKE ROQUE A
Mayor BASIN BASIN BASIN
BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN
Agency DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH
W.R.Region IV IV NCR NCR IV-A IV IV IV-A NCR NCR NCR NCR NCR IV-A IV-A IV-A NCR IV-A IV-A IV-A IV-A IV-A IV-A VII NCR NCR IV-A IV-A
Metro
Province Quezon Quezon Rizal Rizal Quezon Laguna Laguna Laguna Rizal Rizal Rizal Metro Manila Rizal Rizal Rizal Laguna Laguna Batangas Quezon Cavite Batangas Cavite Quezon BOHOL Muntinlupa Las
CityPiñas CityBatangas Quezon
Manila
Town, Village Banugao, lnfanta
SanBarangay
Jose, Rodriguez
Wawa, San Farael, Montalban San Jose, Rodriguez
Wawa, Rodriguez
Sto. Nino,
San Marikina
Rafael,
Riverside,
Montalban,
Parang,
Rizal
San Marikina
Lorenzo, City
Pililla,Calamba
Rizal
Pagsawitan,
HerefordSta.
St., Cruz
ProjectSampaga,
8, QuezonBalayan
City
Alsam, Tayabas
Bukal, Maragondon
Palico,Palubluban,
Nasugbu General
STO.
Tignoan,
ROSARIO,
Trias
J.P.
Real
Rizal
ANTEQUERA,
St., Aplaya,
Real St.,
Pob.
BOHOL
Zapote,
Muntinlupa
Las
SanPiñas
Roque,
City City
Tumbaga,
Bauan Sariaya
Latitude 14.709 14.754 14.734 14.728 15.213 14.446 14.218 14.211 14.490 14.736 14.730 14.638 14.733 14.675 14.496 14.218 14.268 14.663 13.934 14.039 14.274 14.048 14.339 14.567 9.760 14.393 14.465 13.793 13.951
Longitude 121.582 121.613 121.130 121.192 121.409 121.454 121.155 121.153 121.305 121.129 121.192 121.092 121.172 121.108 121.308 121.155 121.422 121.351 120.796 121.625 120.759 120.693 120.879 121.614 123.900 121.051 120.965 120.955 121.524
Elevation 33.329 21.000 69.000 10.462 - - - - - 110.287 94.410 7.635 197.580 44.200 10.000 10.000 1,750.000 132.236
C.A.(km2) 879.0 879.0 381.0 281.0 593.4 48.0 106.0 185.0 26.0 381.0 281.0 499.0 282.0 47.3 26.0 106.0 126.0 22.5 39.0 54.0 242.0 167.0 30.0 85.0 45.0 3,158.0 17.0 16.0 4.0
Year Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.
1979 1.642
1980
1981
1982
1983 0.756 0.326 0.390 0.176
1984 0.301 0.373 0.373 1.070 0.594 0.577 1.068 0.473
1985 0.843 0.137 0.597 0.597 0.135 0.555 0.413 0.776 0.843 2.491 0.961 0.649
1986 1.226 2.082 0.285 4.534 4.534 2.082 0.908 1.035 0.541 1.952 0.630 0.928
1987 0.543 0.192 0.161 0.954 0.954 0.192 0.515 0.993 0.385 1.652 0.327 0.215 1.168
1988 0.997 0.615 0.187 0.481 0.481 0.615 0.352 0.480 0.634 2.132 0.176 1.618
1989 0.396 0.432 0.120 0.582 0.582 0.432 0.554 0.670 0.537 2.350 0.236 0.644
1990 1.451 0.158 0.459 0.485 0.108 0.896 1.451 0.158 0.896 0.485 0.717 0.495 0.493 1.518 0.202 0.555
1991 1.981 0.190 0.648 0.121 0.340 1.981 0.190 0.340 0.330 0.856 0.679 0.593 1.417 0.200 0.966
1992 0.175 0.684 0.157 0.630 0.175 0.630 0.334 0.361 0.546 0.222 0.155 0.218 0.657
1993 1.127 0.471 0.465 0.096 1.127 0.471 0.941 0.214 0.358 0.430 0.307 0.208 3.941
1994 0.925 0.504 0.134 0.925 0.504 0.505 0.534 0.477 0.500 1.861 0.507 0.276
1995 1.481 0.595 0.100 1.481 0.595 3.805 0.375 0.275 0.460 1.844 0.339 0.195
1996 0.630 0.539 0.053 0.630 0.539 0.112 0.286 0.388 0.603 1.550 1.490 0.204
1997 0.461 0.664 0.052 0.461 0.664 0.357 0.395 0.353 0.543 0.984 0.237
1998 0.627 0.466 0.031 0.627 0.466 1.199 0.269 0.264 0.429 1.004 0.791 0.237
1999 0.614 0.301 0.186 0.019 0.614 0.301 0.103 0.323 0.327 0.439 0.844 2.782 0.177
2000 0.688 0.529 0.218 0.395 0.688 0.529 0.740 0.124 1.026 0.778 0.421 0.205
2001 0.869 0.736 0.719 0.272 0.372 0.736 0.719 0.294 0.641 0.997 0.481 0.280
2002 1.161 0.059 0.693 0.309 0.217 0.059 0.693 0.446 0.534 1.090 0.356
2003 1.107 0.352 0.193 1.107 0.311 0.633 0.932 0.820
2004 0.617 0.330 0.265 0.617 0.235 0.278 0.743 0.454 2.074
2005 0.580 0.137 0.319 0.580 0.690 0.592 3.224 0.197 0.012 0.671 0.206 1.242
2006 0.493 0.209 0.324 0.493 0.702 0.586 5.451 1.846 1.207 0.295 0.078 0.681 0.409 0.000 0.007 1.487
2007 0.229 0.249 0.602 0.609 1.199 1.242 0.510 0.903 0.461 0.747 0.604 0.000 0.008 0.793
2008 0.204 0.471 0.780 1.020 1.489 0.851 0.373 0.705 0.000 0.006 1.066
2009 0.240 1.953 1.557 181.091 2.316 0.780 0.535 0.431 0.000 0.007 1.376
2010 0.245 0.574 0.488 0.394 0.854 0.732 2.331 0.486 0.000 0.007 1.134
2011 1.545 0.825 2.187 0.327 0.694 0.566 1.031 1.679 0.716 0.006 1.830
2012 154.030 0.989 9.361 0.742 1.239 0.558 1.600 0.556 2.119
2013 0.997 6.113 0.400 0.991 1.575 0.609 1.888
2014 3.303 1.286 1.361 0.759 10.401 0.739 0.735
2015 0.693 0.501 0.306 1.269 0.576 0.889 1.020 1.153
2016 0.382 1.508 3.384 0.948 0.623 0.192 1.435 0.503 0.957
2017 0.238 0.239 0.533 1.453 0.364 0.766
2018 1.531 0.247 0.469 1.021
2019
2020
Max. 1.161 1.642 1.981 0.719 0.352 1.226 2.082 0.285 4.534 154.030 0.719 1.557 181.091 5.451 4.534 3.805 1.846 1.361 3.224 1.070 0.908 1.035 10.401 2.491 2.782 0.000 0.008 0.280 3.941
Ave. 1.015 1.642 0.849 0.462 0.250 0.478 0.617 0.116 1.127 7.229 0.462 0.858 16.014 1.492 1.127 0.750 1.014 1.009 0.733 0.793 0.429 0.515 0.950 1.398 0.685 0.000 0.007 0.218 1.208
Min. 0.869 1.642 0.059 0.158 0.137 0.186 0.137 0.019 0.340 0.059 0.158 0.574 0.239 0.306 0.340 0.103 0.247 0.694 0.295 0.555 0.078 0.124 0.012 0.671 0.155 0.000 0.006 0.176 0.176
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Table D-31 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-IV, Mindro Island
BUCAYA MINGPIN PAGBAH SUMAGU BUCAYA MINGPIN PAGBAH SUMAGU
Station AMNAY BACO BALITE BAROC PATRICK POLA Barsinaga AMNAY BACO BALITE BAROC PATRICK POLA Barsinaga
O G AN I O G AN I
MAG- MAG-
PAGBAH PAGBAH
AMNAY BACO BALITE BAROC BUCAYA MINGPIN PATRICK POLA SUMAGU ASAWAN AMNAY BACO BALITE BAROC BUCAYA MINGPIN PATRICK POLA SUMAGU ASAWAN
River AN AN
RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER O G RIVER RIVER RIVER I RIVER G TUBIG RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER O G RIVER RIVER RIVER I RIVER G TUBIG
RIVER RIVER
RIVER RIVER
PAGBAH MAG- PAGBAH MAG-
AMNAY BACO BALITE BAROC BUCAYA MINGPIN PATRICK POLA SUMAGU AMNAY BACO BALITE BAROC BUCAYA MINGPIN PATRICK POLA SUMAGU
AN ASAWAN AN ASAWAN
Basin RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER O RIVER G RIVER RIVER RIVER I RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER O RIVER G RIVER RIVER RIVER I RIVER
RIVER G TUBIG RIVER G TUBIG
BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN
BASIN RIVER BASIN RIVER
Agency DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH
W.R.Region IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B
Province Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Occidental Mindoro
Occidental Mindoro
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Occidental Mindoro
Occidental Mindoro
Occidental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro
Town, Village Pag-asa. Sta.Longos,
Cruz CalapanNarra, Gloria
Sta. Brigida, Mansalay
Bucayao, Calapan
Balansay, Mamburao
Talabaan, Mamburao
San Agustin,
Sto.
Sablayan
Nino, Pinamalayan
Sumagui, Bansud
Barsinaga, Naujan
Pag-asa. Sta.Longos,
Cruz CalapanNarra, Gloria
Sta. Brigida, Mansalay
Bucayao, Calapan
Balansay, Mamburao
Talabaan, Mamburao
San Agustin,
Sto.
Sablayan
Nino, Pinamalayan
Sumagui, Bansud
Barsinaga, Naujan
Latitude 12.958 13.358 12.946 12.566 13.311 13.213 13.140 12.776 13.051 12.802 13.280 12.958 13.358 12.946 12.566 13.311 13.213 13.140 12.776 13.051 12.802 13.280
Longitude 120.890 121.119 121.473 121.488 121.187 120.647 120.699 120.921 121.423 121.471 121.258 120.890 121.119 121.473 121.488 121.187 120.647 120.699 120.921 121.423 121.471 121.258
Elevation Annaul Annaul 5.000 1.000 10.217 0.700 0.579 3.000 0.385 5.000 1.000 10.217 0.700 0.579 3.000 0.385
C.A.(km2) Rainfall Rainfall 338.0 352.0 133.0 111.0 352.0 56.0 259.0 249.0 207.0 112.0 72.6 338.0 352.0 133.0 111.0 352.0 56.0 259.0 249.0 207.0 112.0 72.6
Year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.
1979 3,538.6 3,294.9
1980 2,785.6 2,632.2
1981 2,489.0 2,155.1
1982 2,296.5 1,850.7
1983 1,857.8 1,489.0
1984 2,885.3 2,293.0
1985 2,449.1 2,028.1
1986 2,927.2 2,300.4
1987 1,937.8 1,535.3
1988 2,614.5 2,283.5
1989 2,597.4 2,011.9 11,799 5,611 5.865 2.789
1990 2,862.0 2,209.6 7,399 9,519 1,648 5,727 3.348 4.308 0.746 2.592
1991 2,557.4 1,890.3 6,399 6,578 769 3,568 3.385 3.480 0.407 1.888
1992 2,350.7 1,760.4 1,799 5,410 22,076 572 9,390 1.022 3.073 9.391 0.325 5.334
1993 2,831.9 2,376.9 8,395 3,624 1,052 13,546 3.532 1.280 0.442 5.699
1994 2,489.0 2,010.5 10,100 3,433 3,044 31,042 5.023 1.379 1.514 15.440
1995 2,986.2 2,469.4 12,346 5,533 3,528 31,495 5.000 1.853 1.429 12.754
1996 2,410.8 1,963.1 16,043 3,380 2,686 6,376 8.172 1.402 1.368 3.248
1997 2,056.2 1,540.1 11,903 4,969 1,382 4,475 7.729 2.416 0.897 2.905
1998 2,649.9 2,306.7 4,980 6,384 2,881 2,861 2.159 2.409 1.249 1.240
1999 3,069.5 2,534.4 13,508 4,312 3,689 1,669 5.330 1.405 1.456 0.659
2000 3,552.7 2,992.6 13,439 2,973 3,803 2,345 4.491 0.837 1.271 0.784
2001 2,666.3 2,260.8 2,457 1,150 5,309 3,540 1,336 1.087 0.509 1.991 1.566 0.591
2002 2,341.5 1,732.6 1,243 616 6,681 2,851 1,078 0.717 0.355 2.853 1.645 0.622
2003 2,366.4 1,836.0 1,268 1,118 3,223 2,843 698 0.691 0.609 1.362 1.549 0.380
2004 2,353.4 1,923.1 1,042 2,393 3,263 2,380 0.542 1.244 1.386 1.238
2005 2,744.3 2,170.5 2,419 1,800 1,783 4,006 1.115 0.829 0.650 1.845
2006 2,970.8 2,442.6 2,651 1,582 1,032 3,785 1.086 0.648 0.348 1.550
2007 2,995.4 2,496.8 8,739 1,498 535 3,071 2,777 11,072 2.918 0.600 0.179 1.230 1.112 4.434
2008 3,135.7 2,734.9 8,613 1,954 224 14,153 2,221 4,551 12,843 2.747 0.714 0.072 5.175 0.812 1.664 4.696
2009 3,286.9 2,664.9 16,374 685 41,345 1,141 2,666 12,170 4.982 0.209 15.515 0.428 1.000 4.567
2010 2,722.5 2,322.3 20,790 646 1,672 1,002 2,862 5,012 7.637 0.237 0.720 0.432 1.233 2.158
2011 3,593.6 2,850.7 26,485 1,552 9,508 1,958 2,806 10,623 7.370 0.432 3.335 0.687 0.984 3.727
2012 3,401.6 2,545.2 6,204 589 9,333 2,348 1,901 12,076 1.824 0.173 3.667 0.923 0.747 4.745
2013 3,513.3 2,832.4 10,840 5,439 1,439 2,014 11,335 3.085 1.920 0.508 0.711 4.002
2014 2,639.5 2,137.8 8,230 29,450 1,515 9,429 3.118 13.776 0.709 4.411
2015 2,033.8 1,622.5 3,999 2,410 485 1,515 9,569 1.966 1.486 0.299 0.934 5.898
2016 2,716.3 2,182.1 10,656 7,270 1,252 1,998 8,962 3.923 3.332 0.574 0.916 4.107
2017 3,134.3 2,820.9 10,945 7,479 1,647 1,765 13,447 3.492 2.651 0.584 0.626 4.767
2018 2,521.2 1,921.8 12,529 4.969
2019 2,420.8 1,818.9
2020 2,995.9 2,676.2
Max. 26,485 11,799 2,651 2,393 16,043 22,076 41,345 3,071 4,551 13,447 31,495 7.637 5.865 1.115 1.244 8.172 9.391 15.515 1.230 1.845 5.898 15.440
Average 12,034 6,849 1,817 1,443 10,202 3,915 12,806 1,644 2,567 8,546 9,842 4.003 3.405 0.819 0.699 4.754 1.536 5.158 0.653 1.127 3.507 4.611
Min. 3,999 1,799 1,042 616 4,980 224 1,672 485 572 698 1,669 1.824 1.022 0.542 0.355 2.159 0.072 0.720 0.299 0.325 0.380 0.659
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Table D-32 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-IV, Palawan
Island
BATANG BATANG
CARAMA MALATG MONTIBL CARAMA MALATG MONTIBL
Station - Iwahig Brgy. Sto. - Iwahig Brgy. Sto.
Y AO E Y AO E
BATANG BATANG
BATANG BATANG
MALATG MALATG
- CARAMA MONTIBL BALSAH - CARAMA MONTIBL BALSAH
River AO IRAAN AO IRAAN
BATANG Y RIVER E RIVER AN BATANG Y RIVER E RIVER AN
RIVER RIVER
RIVER RIVER
MONTIBL MONTIBL
BALSAH BALSAH
Basin E RIVER IRAAN E RIVER IRAAN
AN AN
BASIN BASIN
Agency DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH
W.R.Region IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B IV-B
Province Palawan Palawan Palawan Palawan Palawan Palawan Palawan Palawan Palawan Palawan Palawan Palawan
Town, Village Urduja, Narra
Caramay, Roxas
Malatgao,
lwahig (Penal
Narra
Colony),
Iwahig,
Puerto
Puerto
Princesa
Brgy.Princesa
Sto. Tomas,Urduja,
Roxas Narra
Caramay, Roxas
Malatgao,
lwahig (Penal
Narra
Colony),
Iwahig,
Puerto
Puerto
Princesa
Brgy.Princesa
Sto. Tomas, Roxas
Latitude 9.228 10.184 9.281 9.692 9.772 9.449 9.228 10.184 9.281 9.692 9.772 9.449
Longitude 118.323 119.223 118.462 118.620 118.662 118.547 118.323 119.223 118.462 118.620 118.662 118.547
Elevation Annaul
C.A.(km2) Rainfall 170.0 94.6 208.0 105.0 17.0 11.4 170.0 94.6 208.0 105.0 17.0 11.4
Year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.
1979 2,235.2
1980 2,811.5
1981 1,969.8
1982 1,727.8
1983 1,767.1
1984 1,824.2
1985 2,024.0
1986 1,850.5
1987 1,622.9
1988 2,101.3
1989 1,853.5
1990 1,979.2
1991 1,618.9
1992 1,540.9
1993 2,012.4
1994 1,942.2
1995 2,342.7
1996 2,091.6
1997 1,377.1
1998 2,047.8
1999 2,456.3
2000 2,272.9
2001 1,983.1
2002 1,595.2
2003 2,021.1
2004 1,646.9
2005 2,289.4
2006 2,129.8
2007 1,952.7
2008 2,250.8
2009 2,257.4
2010 2,098.0 306.0 235.2 1,822.9 341.4 323.1 2,277.8 0.146 0.112 0.869 0.163 0.154 1.086
2011 2,364.6 547.3 603.3 18,927.0 312.1 2,621.7 2,034.1 0.231 0.255 8.004 0.132 1.109 0.860
2012 2,110.5 414.2 282.1 2,559.5 392.3 2,985.5 1,597.0 0.196 0.134 1.213 0.186 1.415 0.757
2013 2,333.4 406.5 192.5 3,278.1 318.8 3,032.3 4,166.5 0.174 0.082 1.405 0.137 1.300 1.786
2014 1,972.0 323.0 114.7 5,817.4 326.6 2,465.3 4,143.5 0.164 0.058 2.950 0.166 1.250 2.101
2015 1,161.8 74.6 1,081.7 320.0 744.5 0.064 0.931 0.275 0.641
2016 1,980.4 508.4 4,659.9 289.9 1,808.4 0.257 2.353 0.146 0.913
2017 2,315.4 375.5 1,777.0 268.1 2,061.6 3,759.5 0.162 0.767 0.116 0.890 1.624
2018 1,847.2 285.6 1,764.7 0.155 0.955
2019 1,619.4
2020 1,999.3
Max. 547 603 18,927 392 3,032 4,167 0.257 0.255 8.004 0.275 1.415 2.101
Average 360 286 4,990 321 1,979 2,996 0.172 0.128 2.312 0.165 0.959 1.369
Min. 75 115 1,082 268 323 1,597 0.064 0.058 0.767 0.116 0.154 0.757
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Table D-33 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-V, Bicol
SAN SAN
SAN CULACLIN SAN LA SAN CULACLIN SAN LA
Station TALISAY FRANCISC BICOL YABO TALISAY FRANCISC BICOL YABO
ISIDRO G AGUSTIN PURISIMA ISIDRO G AGUSTIN PURISIMA
O O
SAN SAN SAN SAN
CULACLIN TALISAY BICOL YABO CULACLIN TALISAY BICOL YABO
River ASLONG AGUSTIN FRANCISC ANAYAN ASLONG AGUSTIN FRANCISC ANAYAN
G RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER G RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER
RIVER O RIVER RIVER O RIVER
SAN SAN
BICOL TALISAY BICOL BICOL YABO BICOL TALISAY BICOL BICOL YABO
AGUSTIN AGUSTIN
Basin ASLONG RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER ANAYAN RIVER ASLONG RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER ANAYAN RIVER
RIVER RIVER
BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN
BASIN BASIN
Agency DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH
W.R.Region V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V
ProvinceCAMARINES SUR
Camarines Sur Albay Albay Sorsogon Camarines CAMARINES
Sur SUR
Camarines CAMARINES
Sur SUR
Camarines Sur Albay Albay Sorsogon Camarines CAMARINES
Sur SUR
Camarines Sur
Town,
SANVillage
ISIDRO, LIBMANAN
Del Rosario, Lupi
Alliang, Ligao
San Agustin, Libon
Guinobatan Sto.
AlbayDomingo,LA
Nabua
PURISIMA,
SanPILI
Isidro,SAN
NagaISIDRO,
City LIBMANAN
Del Rosario, Lupi
Alliang, Ligao
San Agustin, Libon
Guinobatan Sto.
AlbayDomingo,LA
Nabua
PURISIMA,
SanPILI
Isidro, Naga City
Latitude 13.674 13.777 13.191 13.326 13.189 13.405 13.572 13.617 13.674 13.777 13.191 13.326 13.189 13.405 13.572 13.617
Longitude 122.997 122.790 123.456 123.499 123.603 123.324 123.290 123.259 122.997 122.790 123.456 123.499 123.603 123.324 123.290 123.259
Elevation 3.590 6.740 0.000 13.100 0.450 45.719 3.590 6.740 0.000 13.100 0.450 45.719
C.A.(km2) 20.0 64.0 90.0 262.0 70.0 905.0 5.0 25.0 20.0 64.0 90.0 262.0 70.0 905.0 5.0 25.0
Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff
Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff
Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient
Year (mm/year) (mm/year) (mm/year) (mm/year) (mm/year) (mm/year) (mm/year) (mm/year) - - - - - - - -
1979
1980
1981
1982 741.9 552.9 1,317.5 1,686.7 2,777.3 0.265 0.225 0.537 0.602 0.992
1983 696.9 603.4 799.0 778.2 4,680.6 0.344 0.286 0.379 0.384 2.310
1984 860.9 650.2 810.8 1,483.7 2,155.8 0.333 0.246 0.306 0.573 0.833
1985 444.0 594.2 955.2 1,473.3 0.156 0.219 0.352 0.517
1986 624.2 611.0 1,000.0 1,039.1 0.227 0.252 0.412 0.379
1987 665.9 215.4 962.6 1,481.9 0.288 0.096 0.428 0.641
1988 1,789.9 2,874.4 0.670 1.020
1989 842.9 1,566.0 2,079.3 0.286 0.537 0.706
1990 533.4 944.7 0.207 0.390
1991 571.6 413.3 1,431.7 0.253 0.189 0.653
1992 532.1 614.5 1,287.0 0.240 0.318 0.665
1993 444.8 890.7 2,039.8 0.142 0.308 0.705
1994 632.0 584.8 2,131.6 0.240 0.226 0.824
1995 949.8 796.2 4,475.7 0.271 0.233 1.309
1996 833.4 646.3 3,672.1 0.314 0.228 1.297
1997 453.3 700.0 3,155.9 0.235 0.379 1.709
1998 443.5 536.7 0.145 0.191
1999 931.8 459.6 0.232 0.123
2000
2001
2002 663.4 0.294
2003 123.6 1,366.5 0.058 0.647
2004 961.2 1,095.8 0.362 0.413
2005 833.2 1,325.4 8,924.1 0.261 0.416 2.629
2006 1,831.6 7,046.0 0.608 2.359
2007 1,371.0 5,548.7 0.433 1.751
2008 1,764.6 1,853.0 0.440 0.462
2009 1,674.5 6,254.0 0.464 1.733
2010 1,522.5 1,241.5 0.475 0.387
2011 2,072.7 11,314.6 0.483 2.637
2012 2,612.3 1,195.2 0.773 0.354
2013 2,705.1 591.2 0.838 0.183
2014 3,498.8 36,496.0 1.229 12.819
2015 3,267.0 127,117.8 1.553 60.428
2016 1,755.7 7,019.7 0.650 2.600
2017
2018
2019
2020
Max. 3,499 949.827 961.188 4,475.652 1,831.637 2,874.382 127,117.804 4,680.582 1.553 0.344 0.379 1.709 0.647 1.020 60.428 2.310
Average 2,224 658.969 602.680 1,771.216 1,404.822 1,612.082 17,883.486 3,204.546 0.734 0.246 0.237 0.698 0.521 0.603 7.362 1.378
Min. 1,371 443.482 123.608 798.963 1,095.771 778.218 591.155 2,155.764 0.433 0.142 0.058 0.306 0.413 0.379 0.183 0.833
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Table D-35 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-VII, Cebu
Annual Runoff (mm/year) Runoff Coefficient
Year Annual 304 305 306 307 304 305 306 307
Rainfall Jomgao Media Old Bago STA ANA Jomgao Media Old Bago STA ANA
Argao Argao Guinabasan STA ANA Argao Argao Guinabasan STA ANA
71 km2 80 km2 153 km2 45 km2 71 km2 80 km2 153 km2 45 km2
mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year XX OK OK OK
1979 1,622
1980 2,240
1981 1,470
1982 1,294
1983 1,480
1984 1,978 570 863 0.29 0.44
1985 1,624 241 497 562 0.15 0.31 0.35
1986 1,677 620 725 391 0.37 0.43 0.23
1987 1,174 1,900 124 371 1.62 0.11 0.32
1988 1,656 1,690 325 470 1.02 0.20 0.28
1989 1,484 1,423 778 326 0.96 0.52 0.22
1990 1,574 620 255 0.39 0.16
1991 1,268 174 120 0.14 0.09
1992 1,045 200 59 0.19 0.06
1993 1,614 303 552 0.19 0.34
1994 1,566 451 192 687 0.29 0.12 0.44
1995 1,773 353 518 474 0.20 0.29 0.27
1996 1,870 369 924 365 0.20 0.49 0.20
1997 1,276 191 237 151 0.15 0.19 0.12
1998 1,252 158 495 63 0.13 0.40 0.05
1999 2,060 222 594 271 0.11 0.29 0.13
2000 2,048 358 296 898 0.18 0.14 0.44
2001 1,961 86 706 763 0.04 0.36 0.39
2002 1,327 111 498 157 0.08 0.38 0.12
2003 1,758 384 397 336 0.22 0.23 0.19
2004 1,302 425 363 355 0.33 0.28 0.27
2005 1,483 174 117 305 0.12 0.08 0.21
2006 1,733 411 362 0.24 0.21
2007 1,723 594 0.34
2008 2,245
2009 1,762 638 0.36
2010 1,712 19,538 11.41
2011 2,729 6,714 2.46
2012 1,815 5,964 715 3.29 0.39
2013 1,900 26,327 558 13.86 0.29
2014 2,120 555 0.26
2015 1,096 383 0.35
2016 1,570 270 0.17
2017 2,189
2018 1,653
2019 1,189
2020 1,767
Max. 2,729 26,327 1,900 924 898 13.86 1.62 0.52 0.44
Ave. 1,668 14,636 537 439 422 7.75 0.36 0.27 0.25
Min, 1,045 5,964 86 117 59 2.46 0.04 0.08 0.05
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Table D-36 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-VII, Bohol
Station ABATAN ABATAN LOBOC GABAYAN HIBAYOG MAMBO-OL MANABA TANGUHAY ABATAN ABATAN LOBOC GABAYAN HIBAYOG MAMBO-OL MANABA TANGUHAY
River ABATAN ABATAN LOBOC GABAYAN HIBAYOG MAMBO-OL MANABA TANGUHAY ABATAN ABATAN LOBOC GABAYAN HIBAYOG MAMBO-OL MANABA TANGUHAY
ANTEQUER ANTEQUER
Basin ABATAN CANTIMOC GABAYAN HIBAYOG MAMBO-OL MANABA TANGUHAY ABATAN CANTIMOC GABAYAN HIBAYOG MAMBO-OL MANABA TANGUHAY
A A
Agency DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH
W.R.Region VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII
Province BOHOL BOHOL BOHOL BOHOL BOHOL BOHOL BOHOL BOHOL BOHOL BOHOL BOHOL BOHOL BOHOL BOHOL BOHOL BOHOL
Town,
SAN ISIDRO,
VillageSTO.
BALILIHAN,
ROSARIO, BOHOL
ANTEQUERA,
VILLARCAYO,BOHOLCARMEN,
CANAWA,BOHOLCANDIJAY,
LA VICTORIA,
BOHOL
CARMEN,
MAMBO-OL,CANDULAO,
BOHOL
DUERO, BOHOL
G.BULAWAN,
HERNANDEZ, GUINDULMAN,
SAN
BOHOLISIDRO,
STO.
BOHOL
BALILIHAN,
ROSARIO,BOHOL
VILLARCAYO,
ANTEQUERA, CANAWA,
BOHOL
CARMEN, BOHOL
CANDIJAY,
LA VICTORIA,
BOHOL
CARMEN,
MAMBO-OL,CANDULAO,
BOHOL
DUERO, BOHOL
G.BULAWAN,
HERNANDEZ, GUINDULMAN,
BOHOL BOHOL
Latitude 9.789 9.760 9.837 9.843 9.874 9.701 9.632 9.768 9.789 9.760 9.837 9.843 9.874 9.701 9.632 9.768
Longitude 123.957 123.900 124.179 124.442 124.130 124.375 124.304 124.474 123.957 123.900 124.179 124.442 124.130 124.375 124.304 124.474
Elevation 48.734 44.200 197.191 26.069 170.690 10.000 68.131 46.840 48.734 44.200 197.191 26.069 170.690 10.000 68.131 46.840
C.A.(km2) 140.0 45.0 91.0 28.0 41.0 22.0 93.0 21.0 140.0 45.0 91.0 28.0 41.0 22.0 93.0 21.0
Period 1984-2000 1984-2016 1985-2006 1985-2003 1986-2003 1987-2011 1984-2016 1986-2004 1984-2000 1984-2016 1985-2006 1985-2003 1986-2003 1987-2011 1984-2016 1986-2004
Notes PKII_Level3 PKII_Level3 PKII_Level3 PKII_Level3 PKII_Level3 PKII_Level3 PKII_Level3 PKII_Level3 PKII_Level3 PKII_Level3 PKII_Level3 PKII_Level3 PKII_Level3 PKII_Level3 PKII_Level3 PKII_Level3
Year (mm/year) (mm/year) (mm/year) (mm/year) (mm/year) (mm/year) (mm/year) (mm/year) - - - - - - - -
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984 1,893 2,239 752 0.784 0.927 0.312
1985 1,335 2,043 802 1,094 907 0.720 1.102 0.432 0.590 0.489
1986 1,026 1,462 965 1,051 552 1,121 1,322 0.537 0.765 0.505 0.549 0.289 0.586 0.691
1987 379 581 433 523 183 1,175 473 448 0.289 0.444 0.331 0.400 0.140 0.898 0.361 0.342
1988 656 515 587 621 1,945 578 3,596 0.342 0.269 0.307 0.324 1.015 0.302 1.877
1989 911 628 527 2,118 415 0.518 0.357 0.300 1.204 0.236
1990 912 1,531 779 1,518 752 0.506 0.849 0.432 0.842 0.417
1991 609 331 620 329 419 314 0.436 0.237 0.444 0.236 0.300 0.225
1992 171 295 436 495 355 626 129 303 0.141 0.243 0.358 0.407 0.292 0.515 0.106 0.249
1993 567 754 800 1,433 622 997 392 836 0.322 0.428 0.454 0.813 0.353 0.566 0.222 0.474
1994 276 1,014 715 1,361 1,555 906 1,126 2,059 0.155 0.568 0.401 0.763 0.871 0.507 0.631 1.154
1995 474 919 675 1,156 1,750 1,151 1,376 2,587 0.231 0.448 0.329 0.563 0.852 0.561 0.670 1.260
1996 848 3,119 880 2,622 1,087 2,357 1,851 626 0.397 1.461 0.412 1.228 0.509 1.104 0.867 0.294
1997 462 1,540 470 757 934 2,244 906 345 0.314 1.045 0.319 0.513 0.634 1.523 0.614 0.234
1998 601 2,121 423 563 693 1,291 276 0.475 1.677 0.334 0.445 0.548 1.021 0.219
1999 1,285 9,535 639 1,434 1,062 2,572 1,091 1,210 0.534 3.963 0.265 0.596 0.442 1.069 0.453 0.503
2000 1,109 1,550 936 1,821 1,156 3,322 1,728 1,334 0.475 0.663 0.401 0.780 0.495 1.422 0.740 0.571
2001 1,203 864 1,306 923 1,868 826 588 0.503 0.362 0.547 0.386 0.782 0.346 0.246
2002 759 755 928 537 1,679 656 400 0.472 0.470 0.578 0.334 1.045 0.408 0.249
2003 1,428 1,251 1,951 875 1,402 842 844 0.662 0.580 0.905 0.406 0.650 0.391 0.391
2004 921 672 1,165 320 200 0.645 0.471 0.816 0.224 0.140
2005 565 554 945 335 0.329 0.322 0.549 0.195
2006 1,122 653 1,519 499 0.593 0.345 0.803 0.264
2007 1,522 1,005 300 0.762 0.503 0.150
2008 2,274 2,881 748 0.924 1.171 0.304
2009 1,242 3,929 608 0.582 1.841 0.285
2010 1,286 1,595 359 0.758 0.941 0.212
2011 2,320 5,462 1,048 0.766 1.803 0.346
2012 1,627 0.764
2013 1,747 817 0.782 0.366
2014 1,810 3,078 0.695 1.183
2015 2,010 700 1.408 0.490
2016 1,238 162 0.698 0.092
2017
2018
2019
2020
Max. 1,893 9,535 1,251 2,622 1,750 5,462 3,078 3,596 0.784 3.963 0.580 1.228 0.871 1.841 1.183 1.877
Average 795 1,733 688 1,151 808 1,844 796 1,113 0.422 0.865 0.380 0.612 0.436 0.938 0.397 0.578
Min. 171 295 331 495 183 419 129 200 0.141 0.243 0.237 0.307 0.140 0.300 0.092 0.140
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Table D-37 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-VII, Negros
Station ALUM ANULOD BAIS BAIS OKOY SIATON SIATON TANJAY ALUM ANULOD BAIS BAIS OKOY SIATON SIATON TANJAY
River ALUM ANULOD BAIS BAIS OKOY SIATON SIATON TANJAY ALUM ANULOD BAIS BAIS OKOY SIATON SIATON TANJAY
Basin ALUM ANULOD BAIS BAIS OKOY SIATON SIATON TANJAY ALUM ANULOD BAIS BAIS OKOY SIATON SIATON TANJAY
Agency DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH
W.R.Region VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII VII
Province NEGROS ORIENTAL
NEGROS ORIENTAL
NEGROS ORIENTAL
NEGROS ORIENTAL
NEGROS ORIENTAL
NEGROS ORIENTAL
NEGROS ORIENTAL
NEGROS ORIENTAL
NEGROS ORIENTAL
NEGROS ORIENTAL
NEGROS ORIENTAL
NEGROS ORIENTAL
NEGROS ORIENTAL
NEGROS ORIENTAL
NEGROS ORIENTAL
NEGROS ORIENTAL
Town,
BUENAVISTA,
Village GUIHULNGAN,
CABUGAN,
CABANLUTAN,
BINDOY,
NEGROS
CABANLUTAN,
NEGROS
BAIS
ORIENTAL
CITY,
PALINPINON,
ORIENTAL
BAIS
NEGROS
CITY,
POBLACION,
VALENCIA,
ORIENTAL
NEGROSPOBLACION,
SIATON,
ORIENTAL
NEGROS
PINANLAYAAN,
NEGROS
ORIENTAL
SIATON,
BUENAVISTA,
ORIENTAL
NEGROS
PAMPLONA,
ORIENTAL
GUIHULNGAN,
CABUGAN,
NEGROS
CABANLUTAN,
BINDOY,
ORIENTAL
NEGROS
CABANLUTAN,
NEGROS
BAIS
ORIENTAL
CITY,
PALINPINON,
ORIENTAL
BAIS
NEGROS
CITY,
POBLACION,
VALENCIA,
ORIENTAL
NEGROSPOBLACION,
SIATON,
ORIENTAL
NEGROS
PINANLAYAAN,
NEGROS
ORIENTAL
SIATON,ORIENTAL
NEGROS
PAMPLONA,
ORIENTAL
NEGROS ORIENTAL
Latitude 10.143 9.751 9.583 9.583 9.135 9.061 9.061 9.463 10.143 9.751 9.583 9.583 9.135 9.061 9.061 9.463
Longitude 123.244 123.142 123.078 123.078 123.234 123.026 123.026 123.106 123.244 123.142 123.078 123.078 123.234 123.026 123.026 123.106
Elevation Annaul 96.525 48.740 48.740 48.190 1.178 45.102 96.525 48.740 48.740 48.190 1.178 45.102
C.A.(km2) Rainfall 61.0 122.0 56.0 50.0 100.0 220.0 220.0 163.0 61.0 122.0 56.0 50.0 100.0 220.0 220.0 163.0
Date mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year mm/year Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.Runoff Coef.
1979 2,090
1980 2,390
1981 1,693
1982 1,567
1983 1,748
1984 2,319 3,039 1,377 2,900 1.310 0.594 1.250
1985 1,856 1,518 1,267 1,092 2,125 0.818 0.683 0.588 1.145
1986 1,941 1,129 683 1,200 2,324 2,446 0.581 0.352 0.618 1.197 1.260
1987 1,402 775 581 889 1,189 1,378 0.553 0.414 0.634 0.848 0.983
1988 1,937 1,687 441 1,242 1,293 0.871 0.227 0.641 0.667
1989 1,745 1,251 621 1,005 1,326 0.717 0.356 0.576 0.760
1990 1,825 750 749 1,283 2,340 0.411 0.410 0.703 1.282
1991 1,464 964 857 2,162 1,893 0.658 0.585 1.476 1.293
1992 1,282 390 3,411 467 2,168 1,967 0.304 2.660 0.364 1.691 1.534
1993 1,836 540 4,552 543 1,702 2,767 0.294 2.479 0.296 0.927 1.507
1994 1,750 598 997 808 2,567 2,075 0.342 0.570 0.462 1.467 1.186
1995 2,214 1,051 821 922 2,114 1,380 0.474 0.371 0.416 0.955 0.623
1996 2,235 554 373 772 2,099 2,091 0.248 0.167 0.345 0.939 0.936
1997 1,529 433 404 633 1,622 1,189 0.283 0.264 0.414 1.061 0.778
1998 1,667 270 1,181 776 1,159 866 0.162 0.708 0.465 0.695 0.519
1999 2,580 247 2,521 882 1,891 1,767 0.096 0.977 0.342 0.733 0.685
2000 2,321 473 930 1,713 1,179 0.204 0.401 0.738 0.508
2001 2,047 1,041 1,000 1,460 2,062 0.508 0.489 0.713 1.007
2002 1,605 787 572 1,741 2,184 0.490 0.356 1.085 1.361
2003 2,120 690 755 1,329 2,134 0.325 0.356 0.627 1.007
2004 1,706 661 755 1,328 1,600 0.388 0.442 0.779 0.938
2005 1,630 506 931 1,257 770 0.311 0.571 0.771 0.472
2006 1,869 958 989 2,133 2,533 0.513 0.529 1.141 1.355
2007 1,981 936 789 1,913 2,435 0.473 0.399 0.966 1.229
2008 2,575 1,239 1,264 1,907 3,243 0.481 0.491 0.741 1.259
2009 2,163 1,565 1,276 2,705 3,364 0.724 0.590 1.251 1.555
2010 2,291 414 1,208 1,030 2,473 0.181 0.527 0.450 1.079
2011 2,824 5,755 1,378 1,208 1,673 2.038 0.488 0.428 0.593
2012 2,087 5,755 1,274 1,538 2.758 0.610 0.737
2013 2,285 930 1,176 926 1,488 2,401 0.407 0.514 0.405 0.651 1.051
2014 2,278 2,280 1,132 1,214 1,658 4,515 1.001 0.497 0.533 0.728 1.982
2015 1,230 1,434 822 2,325 1,674 2,553 1.165 0.668 1.890 1.361 2.075
2016 1,765
2017 2,517
2018 1,794
2019 1,415
2020 2,141
Max. 2,824 1,687 5,755 4,552 1,378 2,325 2,900 1,674 4,515 0.871 2.758 2.660 0.668 1.890 1.691 1.361 2.075
Average 1,946 810 3,231 1,206 1,033 982 1,780 1,606 2,079 0.454 1.474 0.652 0.493 0.517 0.947 0.814 1.103
Min. 1,230 247 930 373 414 467 1,005 1,488 770 0.096 0.407 0.167 0.181 0.296 0.450 0.593 0.472
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Table D-40 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-X, Agusan
No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
No. 127 138 139 140 141 142 143 164 191 192 196 211 212 213 127 138 139 140 141 142 143 164 191 192 196 211 212 213
Station ID 10SW082254BRS041
10SW075260BRS045
10SW083254PW010
10SW080255BRS043
10SW084254BRS034
10SW084253BRS036
10SW084254BRS053
10SW085252BRS032
10SW091253BRS029
10SW090253BRS030
10SW090253BRS049
10SW080260BRS051
10SW085253BRS031
10SW075260PW026
10SW082254BRS041
10SW075260BRS045
10SW083254PW010
10SW080255BRS043
10SW084254BRS034
10SW084253BRS036
10SW084254BRS053
10SW085252BRS032
10SW091253BRS029
10SW090253BRS030
10SW090253BRS049
10SW080260BRS051
10SW085253BRS031
10SW075260PW026
San Sto. Kalaw San Sto. Kalaw
Station Damilag Sta. Isabel Talacogon Wawa Esperanza Poblacion Guihao-an Santiago Cabadbaran Sta. Maria Taguibo Damilag Sta. Isabel Talacogon Wawa Esperanza Poblacion Guihao-an Santiago Cabadbaran Sta. Maria Taguibo
Teodoro Rosario Bridge Teodoro Rosario Bridge
Cabadbara Cabadbara
River Agusan Agusan Agusan Simulao Wawa Wawa Wawa Guihao-an Asiga Tubay Simulao Taguibo Agusan Agusan Agusan Agusan Simulao Wawa Wawa Wawa Guihao-an Asiga Tubay Simulao Taguibo Agusan
n n
Basin Agusan Agusan Agusan Agusan Agusan Agusan Guihao-an Jabonga Agusan Tubay Simulao Taguibo Agusan Agusan Agusan Agusan Agusan Agusan Agusan Guihao-an Jabonga Agusan Tubay Simulao Taguibo Agusan
Agency DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH DPWH
W.R.Region X XIII XIII XIII XIII XIII XIII X XIII XIII XIII XIII XIII XI X XIII XIII XIII XIII XIII XIII X XIII XIII XIII XIII XIII XI
Province BukidnonAgusan del Agusan
Sur del Agusan
Sur del Agusan
Sur del Agusan
Sur del Agusan
Sur delAgusan
Sur del Agusan
Norte del Agusan
Norte del Agusan
Norte Del Agusan
Norte del Agusan
Norte del Norte
Davao del NorteBukidnonAgusan del Agusan
Sur del Agusan
Sur del Agusan
Sur del Agusan
Sur del Agusan
Sur delAgusan
Sur del Agusan
Norte del Agusan
Norte del Agusan
Norte Del Agusan
Norte del Agusan
Norte del Norte
Davao del Norte
Town, Village Damilag, Manolo
Sta. Isabel,
Fortich
Sta.
Talacogon
Josefa San Teodoro, Wawa,
Bunawan
Bayugan
Esperanza Sibagat Guihao-an, Buenavista
Santiago CabadbaranSto. Rosario,Sta.
Tubay
Maria, Trento
Taguibo, Butuan
KalawCity
Bridge,
Damilag,
Monkayo
Manolo
Sta. Isabel,
Fortich
Sta.
Talacogon
Josefa San Teodoro, Wawa,
Bunawan
Bayugan
Esperanza Sibagat Guihao-an, Buenavista
Santiago CabadbaranSto. Rosario,Sta.
Tubay
Maria, Trento
Taguibo, Butuan
KalawCity
Bridge, Monkayo
Latitude 8.363 7.989 8.534 8.176 8.797 8.675 8.824 8.972 9.263 9.128 9.161 8.020 8.984 7.833 8.363 7.989 8.534 8.176 8.797 8.675 8.824 8.972 9.263 9.128 9.161 8.020 8.984 7.833
Longitude 125.805 126.033 125.787 125.992 125.7 125.647 125.696 125.4 125.562 125.539 125.554 126.155 125.612 126.050 125.805 126.033 125.787 125.992 125.7 125.647 125.696 125.4 125.562 125.539 125.554 126.155 125.612 126.050
Elevation 47.70 41.40 98.52 0.43 44.32 41.24 48.04 40.77 46.82 46.00 47.70 41.40 98.52 0.43 44.32 41.24 48.04 40.77 46.82 46.00
C.A.(km2) 54.0 1,597.0 7,390.0 961.0 409.0 825.0 389.0 138.0 84.0 219.0 949.0 284.0 74.0 1,355.0 54.0 1,597.0 7,390.0 961.0 409.0 825.0 389.0 138.0 84.0 219.0 949.0 284.0 74.0 1,355.0
Year Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff
(mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr) Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient
1979 1,568 0.44
1980 725 0.18
1981 399 246 1,163 0.13 0.08 0.47
1982 445 2,059 1,277 723 1,191 0.13 0.61 0.38 0.21 0.45
1983 670 151 2,473 0.22 0.05 0.91
1984 1,989 3,001 1,011 2,447 2,320 0.40 0.61 0.20 0.49 0.55
1985 1,110 1,450 3,130 2,922 0.29 0.38 0.81 0.91
1986 2,016 3,160 4,294 1,113 0.51 0.81 1.09 0.34
1987 342 1,397 0.12 0.50
1988 875 0.27
1989 383 625 296 1,514 0.10 0.16 0.08 0.45
1990 1,138 1,100 1,511 2,241 1,419 0.35 0.34 0.47 0.69 0.52
1991 1,317 2,452 1,814 2,508 2,366 253 811 0.44 0.82 0.61 1.00 0.79 0.08 0.34
1992 775 1,529 1,027 1,219 1,072 1,049 1,871 0.34 0.66 0.44 0.66 0.46 0.45 0.85
1993 2,082 3,855 1,113 1,465 2,286 2,146 2,459 0.57 1.05 0.30 0.47 0.62 0.59 0.77
1994 3,090 4,362 1,663 1,149 3,971 5,648 2,855 0.83 1.17 0.45 0.35 1.07 1.52 0.94
1995 1,881 4,271 1,342 1,238 2,995 1,541 861 2,770 0.49 1.12 0.35 0.37 0.79 0.40 0.23 0.89
1996 1,102 2,733 1,668 5,359 1,984 1,040 3,745 0.25 0.62 0.41 1.22 0.45 0.24 1.07
1997 1,528 2,805 3,831 3,948 1,357 1,150 0.40 0.73 1.22 1.03 0.35 0.34
1998 1,085 8 1,497 3,858 3,963 1,659 3,135 0.48 0.00 0.67 2.08 1.76 0.74 1.54
1999 3,142 2,661 4,479 6,826 7,821 918 3,524 0.59 0.50 0.84 1.43 1.47 0.17 0.78
2000 2,297 2,892 2,352 7,728 3,364 2,078 2,204 0.51 0.64 0.52 2.00 0.75 0.46 0.57
2001 1,624 2,366 681 8,059 2,303 3,183 1,911 0.36 0.52 0.15 2.00 0.51 0.70 0.51
2002 1,425 2,572 1,676 4,569 3,404 0.46 0.82 0.62 1.46 1.09
2003 1,630 2,549 2,047 6,052 1,846 0.39 0.62 0.61 1.47 0.45
2004 1,359 1,842 1,126 3,228 1,311 0.45 0.62 0.43 1.08 0.44
2005 2,071 1,262 2,205 1,775 1,241 4,313 2,388 0.55 0.33 0.58 0.47 0.41 1.14 0.63
2006 3,475 1,922 3,007 2,161 749 5,119 3,513 0.98 0.54 0.85 0.61 0.26 1.45 1.00
2007 650 2,152 1,784 3,325 2,664 6,753 3,259 1,553 0.16 0.52 0.43 0.80 0.64 1.62 0.78 0.44
2008 757 2,123 1,913 2,655 2,399 6,188 3,509 2,366 0.16 0.45 0.40 0.56 0.50 1.30 0.74 0.59
2009 780 2,058 2,644 4,662 3,402 5,620 5,517 1,924 0.16 0.42 0.54 0.96 0.70 1.15 1.13 0.48
2010 1,178 1,837 1,625 2,209 2,788 2,466 0.33 0.51 0.45 0.61 0.78 0.77
2011 1,550 3,545 2,379 4,454 0.25 0.58 0.39 0.88
2012 716 865 2,237 0.16 0.19 0.54
2013 5,202 1,812 1.11 0.45
2014 102 976 0.02 0.26
2015 146 3,839 0.05 1.57
2016 173 334 0.06 0.13
2017 482 0.09
2018 1,798 0.52
2019 37 0.01
2020
Max. 5,202 3,142 2,644 4,662 4,479 4,294 3,402 8,059 6,753 7,821 5,517 3,404 5,648 4,454 1.11 0.83 0.54 1.17 0.84 1.09 0.70 2.08 1.62 1.76 1.13 1.09 1.52 1.57
Average 1,275 1,587 2,044 2,661 1,650 1,832 2,435 2,899 4,352 3,230 3,637 1,928 1,833 2,053 0.31 0.41 0.47 0.68 0.45 0.46 0.59 0.89 1.09 0.86 0.85 0.53 0.52 0.63
Min. 37 342 1,784 8 399 151 1,775 749 865 296 2,388 918 253 334 0.01 0.10 0.40 0.00 0.13 0.05 0.47 0.26 0.19 0.08 0.63 0.17 0.08 0.13
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Table D-41 Runoff Coefficient of each Discharge Observation Station in WRR-X, Cagayan de
Oro
No. 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
Station Cabula Pelaez Bridge Cabula Bridge Uguiaban Bridge Liboran Cabula Pelaez Bridge Cabula Bridge Uguiaban Bridge Liboran
River Cagayan Cagayan de Oro Cagayan de Oro Cagayan de O ro Bubunawan Cagayan Cagayan de Oro Cagayan de Oro Cagayan de O ro Bubunawan
Basin Cagayan Cagayan de Oro Cagayan de Oro Cagayan de Oro Cagayan de Oro Cagayan Cagayan de Oro Cagayan de Oro Cagayan de Oro Cagayan de Oro
Agency DPWH PAGASA DPWH ??? NPC DPWH PAGASA DPWH ??? NPC
W.R.Region X X X X X X X X X X
Province Misamis Oriental Misamis Oriental Bukidnon Misamis Oriental Bukidnon Misamis Oriental Misamis Oriental Bukidnon Misamis Oriental Bukidnon
Town, Village Cabula, Cagayan De Cagayan
Oro City
de Oro City
Cagayan de Oro CityCagayan de Oro City
Liboran, Baungon Cabula, Cagayan De Cagayan
Oro City
de Oro City
Cagayan de Oro City
Cagayan de Oro City
Liboran, Baungon
Latitude 8.391 8.422 8.389 8.290 8.383 8.391 8.422 8.389 8.290 8.383
Longitude 124.613 124.629 124.613 124.586 124.649 124.613 124.629 124.613 124.586 124.649
Elevation 95.00 9.32 36.02 137.46 73.28 95.00 9.32 36.02 137.46 73.28
C.A.(km2) 1,079.0 1,521.0 1,079.0 664.6 216.2 1,079.0 1,521.0 1,079.0 664.6 216.2
Year Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff
(mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr) Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991 1,524 0.86
1992 1,625 1.15
1993 2,189 1.02
1994 2,204 1.01
1995 2,865 1.12
1996 3,328 1.23
1997 2,514 1.20
1998 2,287 1.53
1999 2,688 0.87
2000 2,783 1.08
2001 2,251 0.81
2002 2,109 1.18
2003 2,397 1.05
2004 2,120 1.27
2005 2,065 0.99
2006 1,941 1.01
2007 2,074 0.85
2008 2,672 0.95
2009 3,076 1.17
2010 2,696 1.22
2011 3,052 0.90
2012 2,959 1.14
2013 1,234 0.45
2014
2015 3,389 1.96
2016 1,793 17 10 13 17 0.86 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01
2017 1,901 495 515 412 543 0.60 0.16 0.13 0.10 0.14
2018 2,531 135 170 177 169 1.24 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06
2019 2,117 1.23
2020
Ma. 3,389 495 515 412 543 1.96 0.16 0.13 0.10 0.14
Average 2,371 216 232 201 243 1.07 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.07
Min. 1,234 17 10 13 17 0.45 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Source: JICA Survey Team based on Observed Discharge Data by DPWH etc.
Discharge[m3/s]
30 40 30 40
20 60 20 60
10 80 10 80
0 100 0 100
1985/Jan
1985/Ap
1985/Jul
1985/Oc
1985/Jan
1985/Ap
1985/Jul
1985/Oc
t
r
t
C00 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.86) C04 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.86)
50 0 50 0
Discharge[m3/s]
30 40 30 40
20 60 20 60
10 80 10 80
0 100 0 100
1985/Jul
1985/Oct
1985/Jan
1985/Ap
1985/Jan
1985/Ap
1985/Jul
1985/Oc
r
t
C01 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.86) C10 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.86)
50 0 50 0
dail;y Rainfall [mm/day]
Discharge[m3/s]
30 40 30 40
20 60 20 60
10 80 10 80
0 100 0 100
1985/Jan
1985/Ap
1985/Jul
1985/Oc
1985/Jan
1985/Ap
1985/Jul
1985/Oc
r
t
C15 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.96) C24 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.86)
350 0 350 0
300 20
20
250 250
Discharge[m3/s]
Discharge[m3/s]
200 40 200 40
150 60 150 60
100 100
80 80
50 50
0 100 0 100
1985/Jan
1985/Ap
1985/Jul
1985/Oc
1985/Jan
1985/Ap
1985/Jul
1985/Oc
t
r
Discharge[m3/s]
200 40 30 40
150 60 20 60
100 10 80
80
50
0 100
0 100
1985/Oct
1985/Apr
1985/Jul
1985/Jan
1985/Jan
1985/Ap
1985/Jul
1985/Oc
r
300 20
250
Discharge[m3/s]
200 40
150 60
100
50 80
0 100
1985/Apr
1985/Jul
1985/Oct
1985/Jan
C51 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.86)
Source: JICA Survey Team
Figure D-79 Results of Tank Model Calibration of WRR-I, Abra River Basin
C67 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.76)
C234 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.62)
Source: JICA Survey Team
Figure D-80 Results of Tank Model Calibration of WRR-II, Cagayan River Basin
100 0 200 0
dail;y Rainfall [mm/day]
Discharge[m3/s]
60 40 40
obs. 100
40 cal. 60 60
20 80 50 80
0 100 0 100
1985/Ap
1985/Ap
1985/Jul
1985/Jul
1985/Oct
1985/Oct
1985/Jan
1985/Jan
r
r
250 20 40 20
Discharge[m3/s]
Discharge[m3/s]
200
40 30 40
150
60 20 60
100
50 80 10 80
0 100 0 100
1985/Ap
1985/Jul
1985/Oct
1985/Jan
1985/Ap
1985/Jul
1985/Oct
1985/Jan
r
300 20 400 20
Discharge[m3/s]
Discharge[m3/s]
250 40 300 40
200
150 60 200 60
100 80 100 80
50
0 100 0 100
1985/Ap
1985/Jul
1985/Oct
1985/Jan
1985/Ap
1985/Jul
1985/Oct
1985/Jan
r
600 0 100 0
Discharge[m3/s]
Discharge[m3/s]
400
40 60 40
300
60 40 60
200
100 80 20 80
0 100 0 100
1985/Ap
1985/Jul
1985/Oct
1985/Jan
1985/Ap
1985/Jul
1985/Oct
1985/Jan
r
r
C21 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.56) C36 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.56)
100 0
60 40
40 60
20 80
0 100
1985/Jul
1985/Apr
1985/Oct
1985/Jan
C89 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.56)
Source: JICA Survey Team
Figure D-81 Results of Tank Model Calibration of WRR-II, Abulog River Basin
Figure D-82 Results of Tank Model Calibration of WRR-III, Agno River Basin
200 0 200 0
Discharge[m3/s]
40 40
100 100
60 60
50 80 50 80
0 100 0 100
1990/Apr
1998/Apr
1990/Jul
1990/Oct
1998/Jul
1998/Oct
1990/Jan
1998/Jan
250 20 250 20
200
Discharge[m3/s]
Discharge[m3/s]
200 40
40
150 150
60 60
100 100
50 80 50 80
0 100 0 100
1990/Apr
1990/Jul
1990/Oct
1990/Jan
1998/Apr
1998/Jul
1998/Oct
1998/Jan
Discharge[m3/s]
300 40 40
100
200 60 60
50 80
100 80
0 100
0 100
1980/Jul
1980/Apr
1980/Oct
1980/Jan
1990/Oct
1990/Apr
1990/Jul
1990/Jan
80 20 80 20
Discharge[m3/s]
Discharge[m3/s]
60 40 60 40
40 60 40 60
20 80 20 80
0 100 0 100
1980/Jul
1980/Ap
1980/Oct
1980/Jan
1998/Jul
1998/Ap
1998/Oct
1998/Jan
r
r
400 20 400 20
Discharge[m3/s]
Discharge[m3/s]
300 40 300 40
200 60 200 60
100 80 100 80
0 100 0 100
1998/Jul
1998/Ap
1998/Oct
1998/Jan
1998/Jul
1998/Ap
1998/Oct
1998/Jan
r
0
100
150
200
250
300
0
2
4
6
8
0
0
5
50
10
5
10
15
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
20
0
100
0
5
20
40
60
80
10
15
20
0
5
10
15
20
2007/Jan 1986/Jan 1988/Jan 1988/Jan 1990/Jan 2005/Jan 1998/Jan
NK/CTII/JWA
1998/Ap
2007/Apr 1986/Apr 1988/Apr 1988/Apr 1990/Apr 2005/Apr
r
Figure D-83
Source: JICA Survey Team
2007/Jul 1986/Jul 1988/Jul 1988/Jul 1990/Jul 2005/Jul 1998/Jul
C109(Nash-Sutcliffe=0.80)
C931 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.84)
C879 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.61)
C849 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.70)
C3859 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.37)
C3321 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.24)
0
0
0
0
0
80
60
40
20
0
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
100
80
60
40
20
100
100
100
100
100
100
dail;y Rainfall [mm/day] dail;y Rainfall [mm/day] dail;y Rainfall [mm/day] dail;y Rainfall [mm/day] dail;y Rainfall [mm/day] dail;y Rainfall [mm/day] dail;y Rainfall [mm/day]
D-107
Discharge[m3/s] Discharge[m3/s] Discharge[m3/s]
0
2
4
6
8
10
0
2
4
6
8
10
0
5
10
15
20
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
2
4
6
8
10
0
2
4
6
8
10
0
100
20
40
60
80
C820 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.41)
C984 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.81)
C958 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.87)
C889 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.61)
C887 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.84)
C3653 (Nash-Sutcliffe=0.82)
Results of Tank Model Calibration of WRR-III, Pampanga River Basin
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
dail;y Rainfall [mm/day] dail;y Rainfall [mm/day] dail;y Rainfall [mm/day] dail;y Rainfall [mm/day] dail;y Rainfall [mm/day] dail;y Rainfall [mm/day]
dail;y Rainfall [mm/day]
Annex-D-Hydrology
July 2023
Final Report