Users Evaluation of

“Web-App Crime Reporting Management System with Email Notifications”

for PNP Basista

We the fourth year Bachelor of Science in Information Technology students of Pangasinan State
University San Carlos Campus are conducting a study on the development of “Web-App Crime
Reporting Management System with Email Notifications” for PNP Basista as a requirement in
our subject Capstone 102. The developers appreciate it very much if you could accomplish the
questionnaire. Rest assured that all your response will be treated with utmost confidentially and
will be used for educational purposes only. Thank you for your cooperation.

If you have any questions about this questionnaire, please contact:

Gatpo, Elizabeth, A. : elaiza.01gatpo@gmail.com

Torio, Loise Ann, I. : loiseanntorio206@gmail.com
Capiña, Elisa, S. : solomoncapinaelisa@gmail.com

Part 1: Personal Data

Personal Information: Please indicate your information by writing it in the space provided.

Name (optional): ______________________________ Age: _________

Address: ____________________________________ Sex: _________

Type of User (put a check mark): PNP Personnel 

Community Resident 
Administrator 

Part 2: Acceptability of Web App Crime Reporting Management System

Using the scale below, evaluate the system functionalities using ISO 25010 Standard of Software
in terms of Functionality, Efficiency, Compatibility, Usability, Reliability, Security,
Maintainability, and Portability by placing a check (√) mark on the appropriate column. Use the
scale below:

5 4 3 2 1
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Agree Disagree
No Functionality 5 4 3 2 1
1. All the features function as expected.
2. Frequency of encountering bugs or technical issues.

3. The proposed system provides accurate and timely

information about the crime status.

No Efficiency 5 4 3 2 1
1. It is not difficult to move around the website
2. The website is easy to load and fast.

3. I am quickly find what I expected in this website

4. I feel efficient when I am using this website.

5. Using the website is a waste of time.

6. This website help me find what I am looking for.

7. This website seems unlogical to me.

No Compatibility 5 4 3 2 1
1. The proposed system’s interface and database converse
information with each other
2. User-friendly interfaces can encourage public
participation in reporting crimes.
3. The email notification can improve awareness and
response to the submitted Report

No Usability 5 4 3 2 1
1. The proposed system is pleasing and satisfying
interaction for the user.
2. The proposed application is easy to use and analyze.
3. The proposed system can be accessed by all types of
user.
4. The proposed system can be used to effectively achieve
the objectives
5. The proposed system is easier to use.
 No Reliability 5 4 3 2 1
1. This website is very fast.
2. I get what I expected when I click the things in this
website.
3 The proposed system is always ready to use.

No Security 5 4 3 2 1
1. A user-friendly system can encourage more people to
report crimes, leading to better data for law
enforcement.
2. The proposed application is secured from unauthorized
persons to access the system
3. The proposed application ensures the confidentiality of
all the users personal information.

No Maintainability 5 4 3 2 1
1. The proposed system can be installed to different
devices.
2. The proposed system can be modified without an
error.
3. The proposed system can easily be checked to
determine which component will be modified.
4. The proposed system is divided by different modules
where change in one module will have minimal effect
to other modules.
5. The proposed system can be tested by various users to
ensure that the requirements are fulfilled.

No Portability 5 4 3 2 1
1. The system can be accessed and used to report crimes
from different devices like smartphones, tablets, and
computers.
2. Portability allows for broader accessibility,
encouraging more users to report crimes from various
locations.
3. Users can report crimes from any device with a web
browser, increasing accessibility.
Part 3: Suggestions
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________

_________________________
Name & Signature of Tester