Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Guido Lorenzo
Aggregate Demand
Macroeconomic equilibrium:
Y =C +I +X −M (1)
Consumption
C = cY (2)
, with 0 < c < 1
Savings = (1)-(2):
S = Y − C = (1 − c)Y = sY (3)
Imports:
M = mY (4)
Investment (I ) and Exports (X ) are determined exogenously
Y − C = S = sY = I + X − mY
I +X
Y = (5)
s +m
We define Y0 as Potential Output, the highest level of output that
can be achieved (i.e. GDP consistent with full utilization of labor and
capital).
Y and Y0 are not are not necessarily equal. Thus, we need to define
the capacity utilization:
Y
u= (6)
Y0
with 0 < u < 1
Output gap I
Output gap II
i +x
u= (11)
s +m
Set u = 1, i.e. Y = Y0 :
i =s +m−x (12)
Graphically, eq (12)
The model
Kt = It + Kt−1 (1 − δ)
and
Y0 = F (K ; L)
Assuming that the potential output is constrained by the level of
capital (may be true for development countries), then the investment
times the capital productivity (a) gives us the expansion of the
potential output
∆Y0 = aI (13)
Invest or export?
∆Y0
= ai
Y0
∆Y0
Y0 represents the rate of growth of Y0 , that we shall call g . Finally:
g = ai (14)
x = mu (15)
x(s + m) = mi + mx
x(s + m) − mx = mi
x(s + m − m) = mi
m
x= i (17)
s
Eq. (17) can be placed in the same diagram as eq (12). Geometrically, it
will look like a ray from the origin and the slope given by the ratio ms
The system
Finding equilibrium
Both the feasibility constraint and the trade balance condition end up
defining the triangle 0AP0 as a sustainable area.
below the u = 1 line, the product is lower or equal to the potential
output (feasible)
above the x = ms i line, there is trade surplus.
The points inside the 0P0 B triangle are technologically attainable but
are not sustainable as the trade balance can’t run deficit for ever.
Dynamics I
Dynamics II
The equilibrium
Formally, the system is solved when there is full employment and trade
balance equilibrium. Recall eq (12)
i =s +m−x
i0 = s (18)
x0 = m (19)
The underdeveloped economies have shown several difficulties to achieve
the x0 level of exports. The growth of the agricultural activities
(comparative advantage) tends to be slower than the growth of the
manufacturing sector (net importer sector).
Assume that the exports decreases to xJ , lower than the x0 needed for full
employment equilibrium.
To achieve trade balance equilibrium the investment must be limited
up to iJ .
The economy is then located at point J (below the u = 1 line) and
the capacity utilization decreases to uJ :
iJ + xJ
uJ = <1 (20)
s +m
From eq (17) we can rearrange to get iJ as a function of xJ .
s
iJ = xJ (21)
m
When the economy suffers from UPS, the growth of exports is not a mere
alternative for the development of the economy but a necessary condition
for the economic growth take-off.
Eq (23) and Eq (24) tell us that when exports equal x0 , then the
investment equal savings and the economy operates at full capacity.
When the external constraint emerges, each missing dollar decreases
the investment by ms dollars.
When the external constraint emerges, each missing dollar decreases
the output by m1 dollars.
So far the economy was open to trade inflows but nothing was said
about capital inflows.
The international financial movements play a significant role in the
UPS economies business cycles.
The Latin America’s 80’s debt crisis
Tequila effect in the 90’s
The 2008 Subprime crisis propagation.
Let’s introduce the foreign capital into the model, studying it’s double
role: as a source of foreign currency and as real investment.