Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 1 of 14
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................... 3
3.1 PROJECT DELIVERABLES AND WEIGHT................................................................................................................. 3
3.2 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE PROFESSIONAL FIELD.................................................................................................. 4
2. PROJECT RULES AND PLANNING....................................................................................................................... 4
3. ASSESSMNT AND GRADING.............................................................................................................................. 4
APPENDIX 1. PROJECT TASKS PER WEEKS................................................................................................................. 6
APPENDIX 2. LEARNING GOALS AND ACTIVITIES....................................................................................................... 8
APPENDIX 3. RESEARCH COMPETENCES ASSESSMENT RUBRICS..............................................................................12
APPENDIX 4. FORMAT REQUIREMENTS.................................................................................................................. 13
Page 2 of 14
1. INTRODUCTION
Part 1: Feasibility phase (Block 3)
Concept solutions for the selected study area :
compare the preliminary alternative sustainable urban designs for the Feyenoord City
based on coherent and valid criteria (MCA) and select the best alternative to present to the
Municipality of Vlissingen;
detail the selected variant and draft monitoring and maintenance plans and a rough cost
estimation for the area development;
report of the design steps and results;
present of the final project results.
Field visit to The Municipality of Rotterdam:
perall other relevant parts of the project will be covered during the visit i.e. fieldwork,
labwork and additional relevant portfolio information
1
The schedule of requirements (composed of technical and functional requirements) is an overview of all the demands or specifications that will
have to be fulfilled by the design. The objective is to record all wishes and requirements of the client so that the exact function(s) of the civil object
that is going to be designed are fully clear and established, on the other hand respecting regulations and specifications recognised in the field.
2
Alternatives (or variants) can be defined as comparable and competitive solutions to solve a particular design problem.
3
The portfolio is a document containing a series of professional products and assignments not necessarily connected one to each other, but that
together can give proof of the competencies gained.
Page 3 of 14
Portfolio Applied Mechanics 2: 20% of the final grade
Porfolio practicals: 15% of the final grade
Portfolio AutoCAD civil 3D: 5% of the final grade
Portfolio GIS: 5% of the final grade
Portfolio peer review and personal reflection: 5% of the final grade
3.2 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE PROFESSIONAL FIELD
The civil engineering field is very broad, and the job opportunities that it offers are numerous and
various. These blocks will help you to focus upon two particular professions: the geotechnical
engineer and the structural engineer. For both profession, you will experience the work as junior
consultant and contractor.
2. PROJECT RULES AND PLANNING
Your project leader will guide you through the project and will be the spokesperson for the Civil
Engineering team. Furthermore, each group will select a group representative, the team leader,
who will be responsible for the communication between the project leader and the group.
An overview of the teams will be published on the learn.hz.nl page after the project kick-off
meeting. Your relationship with the members of your group will be regulated by a contract,
drafted and signed by the team. This document is the framework that defines the rights and duties
among your teammates, and the role of the lecturers in regulating your mutual relationships.
A tentative weekly calendar can be found in Appendix 1. Every week you will need to complete a
task and to present your results to different judges e.g. lecturers, clients, professionals.
Furthermore, these progress meetings must be led by the team itself, which must provide an
agenda and define action points. The minutes 4 of these meetings (comprising agendas, decisions
and action points) will be part of the appendices of your research proposal and research report.
The professional products i.e. research proposal, portfolios and final research report should have
the same structure as the professional products of the Project 1: Exploring Civil Engineering.
Requirements for formatting is in appendix 4.
3. ASSESSMNT AND GRADING
The professional products are presented to the lecturers and/or to the clients during the poster
and final presentations sessions in block 3 and 4. Group assessments and individual assessments
will help lecturers in understanding your personal input, and the skills and understanding you have
acquired.
For the Block 3 the research proposal and the portfolio are group products and will be graded
according to the predefined assessment form (see Appendix 3). The final grading is determined in
relation to the tasks and learning goals presented in appendix 2 for block 3 (B3). Further, for the
Block 4, the research report and the portfolio are group products and will be graded according to
the predefined assessment form (see Appendix 3). The final grading is determined in relation to
the tasks and learning goals presented in Appendix 2 for block 4 (B4).
4
Minutes, also known as protocols or, informally, notes, are the instant written record of a meeting or hearing. They typically describe the events of
the meeting and may include a list of attendees, a statement of the issues considered by the participants, and related responses or decisions for the
issues.
Page 4 of 14
During the presentation, lecturers will ask individual questions to assess your personal knowledge
about the project; hence, this means that you need to know the complete project in details.
Besides the submitted project deliveries (which includes the portfolios), you will also need to
submit a personal reflection about your input and role within the group: this evaluation will show
your critical attitude, professional ethics and your independent thinking. This reflection will
constitute also your benchmark to improve your performance during your student career.
The assessment scale consists of four grades:
F fail: result does not meet the standard
P pass: result does not meet the standard for all parts but in sufficient extent
G good: result meets the standard for all parts
VG very good: result surpasses the standard
Indication for the grade:
One of the dimensions F -> grade under the 5.5
All dimensions P -> grade between 5.5 and 7.0
Dimensions P and G -> grade between 7.0 and 8.0
Dimensions G and VG -> grade between 8.0 and 9.0
All dimensions VG -> grade > 9.0
Page 5 of 14
APPENDIX 1. PROJECT TASKS PER WEEKS
BLOCK 3
W Topic Tasks
1. You design the logo and name for your company and you
prepare a draft contract, selecting contact person.
Kick off and team set 2. You review the provided material including project and
1
up portfolio assignments and available literature.
3. You make a planning for the block with the division of the
workload and tasks.
1. You research available project literature.
2. You define boundary conditions and determine the
2 Literature review stakeholders and their desires.
3. You draft a program of functional and technical
requirements for your project area.
1. You develop possible alternative solutions for the project
area (3 variants).
2. You draft a preliminary design for the 3 variants
3 Alternative analysis
envisioned
3. You draw sketches and technical drawings of the study
area.
4 Excursion -
1. You integrate the literature and preliminary designs in a
coherent report and story.
5 Integration 2. You evaluate which data about the applied mechanics and
soil mechanics portfolios you want to also include in your
research proposal.
1. You finalize your research proposal.
6
Finalizing 2. You finalize your technical portfolios.
Page 6 of 14
BLOCK 4
W Topic Tasks
1. You get acquainted with the professional field.
1 Guest lecture
Hydrology 1. You perform field experiments at the study location.
assignment, soil 2. You process collected data.
measurements,
2
Land surveying,
GIS, AutoCAD
civil 3D
1. You select relevant criteria to compare your variants and you
decide which weight factors you want to assign them.
3 MCA
2. You carry out a MCA based on relevant criteria.
Please bear in mind that this is just an indication of the activities and tasks that you will perform
during the project. There could be somewhat changes during the block(s).
The detailed weekly planning of the applied mechanics and soil mechanics portfolios is presented
in their relative assignment sheets.
Page 7 of 14
APPENDIX 2. LEARNING GOALS AND ACTIVITIES
The learning goals for Module 1 Dutch- Flemish delta Polders all refer to level 1:
Project block 3:
Page 9 of 14
Project block 4:
Page 11 of 14
Report (Pt.8) (8.1.1) 10%
- The extent and structure is conform the agreements;
- The writing style is objective, precise, logical, careful and
clear;
- The language used is correct, understandable, attractive
and acceptable;
- Includes a correct literature list and statement of sources
in accordance with international standards.
Introduction (Pt.7)(7.1.1) 10%
- Provides an explanation of the field of knowledge, the
theme, the choices relating to content and the objective;
- Is properly delineated and concerns an as yet unresolved
problem situation in professional practice;
- Contains the main question and main question has been
developed into secondary questions where necessary.
Theoretical framework (Pt.7)(7.1.2) 10%
- Sources come partly from the scholarly literature within
the knowledge domain.
- Describes context, underpins knowledge areas, subject
matter, substantive choices and basic assumptions.
- Explains the most important concepts in the problem
formulation together with the relationships.
Methodology (Pt.7)(7.1.3) 10%
- Describes and underpins the selected research method
- It is sound and the steps lead systematically to the
envisioned answers to the questions
- Brings into operation concepts and describes measuring
tools and methods of analysis.
Code of conduct (Pt. 7)(7.4.1) 10%
- Emerges from knowledge of the research role in the
professional area and own role within
- Their part for reflection concerning their own conduct
(individual/employee), processes and results
- Critical analytical attitude emerging from respectful and
ethical conduct (no plagiarizing!)
Poster presentation (Pt.8)(8.1.2) 10%
- There is no report repetition, nor evidence of subject
control and prior knowledge of the audience.
- It is professional (attitude, aids, speaking techniques and
timing)
- Convincing, well-considered and skilfully defended.
- Communicate efficiently and clearly with your
team members and project leader by using
written and oral means
Professional products (Pt.1,2&9) 40%
(9.2.1,1.2.1,1.1.2,2.1.1)
- The proposal focuses on current challenges with relevant
stakeholders;
- The report contains an overview of functional and
technical requirements, boundaries and limitations;
- Several variants are worked out at a preliminary level
taking into account multiple civil engineering aspects;
- Feasible and realistic design ideas are proposed, taking
into account literature information and analysis of the
current situation.
Page 12 of 14
Project block 4 (50% of the final grade)
Weight in Mostly Strongly
Disagree Agree
Standards % agree agree Comments
F (<5.5) G (7-8.5)
P (5.5-7) VG (>8.5)
Report (Pt.8) (8.1.1) 9%
- The extent and structure is conform the agreements;
- The writing style is objective, precise, logical, careful and
clear;
- The language used is correct, understandable, attractive
and acceptable;
- Includes a correct literature list and statement of sources
in accordance with international standards.
Results (Pt.7) (7.2.1,7.2.2) 18%
- It is effective, efficient and acceptable.
- Consists of properly implemented information collection
methods.
- It is reproducible. Data is complete, detailed and laid out
in an orderly way.
Conclusions (Pt.6,7) (7.1.3,7.3.2,6.1.1) 27%
- It is correctly implemented using qualitative and/or
quantitative analysis techniques.
- It is valid with respect to the concepts used, explanatory
and generalization rules
- It is free of reasoning errors, irrelevant arguments and
juggling with the meanings.
- Following up logically from the research (regarding
choices and assumptions)
- Being accepted in problem contexts and acceptable in
the practical domain
- Delivering practical solutions that are sustainable and
acceptable
- Can be realized given the environment, implementers,
availability of time and budget
Code of conduct (Pt. 7)(7.4.1) 9%
- Emerges from knowledge of the research role in the
professional area and own role within
- Their part for reflection concerning their own conduct
(individual/employee), processes and results
- Critical analytical attitude emerging from respectful and
ethical conduct (no plagiarizing!)
Final presentation (Pt.8) (8.1.2) 9%
- There is no report repetition, nor evidence of subject
control and prior knowledge of the audience.
- It is professional (attitude, aids, speaking techniques and
timing)
- Convincing, well-considered and skilfully defended.
Professional products (Pt. 2,5,&9) 28%
(2.2.1,5.1.1,9.2.1)
- The proposal focuses on current challenges with relevant
stakeholders;
- The report contains an overview of functional and
technical requirements, boundaries and limitations;
- Several variants are worked out at a preliminary level
taking into account multiple civil engineering aspects;
- Feasible and realistic design ideas are proposed, taking
into account literature information and analysis of the
current situation.
- Global maintenance plan for final version
Page 14 of 14