TWTL Survey Report - Rev001

TREATED WATER TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT
SURVEY REPORT TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF

WAWA TUNNEL AND PIPELAYING ALIGNMENT
Client : Arcadis Philippines, Inc.

Address : 12th Floor Quadrants B&C, 8 Rockwell Hidalgo Drive, Rockwell Center,
Bgy. Poblacion, Makati City 1210, Philippines
Surveyor : McDonald Consultants, Inc.
Location : City of Antipolo
Unit 201 Ferros Bel-Air Tower Condominium

No. 30 Polaris Street cor. Durban & Felipe Sts.
Makati City 1210
Tel: +632 8847-3196 +632 8986-1426
email: mcdonaldconsultants.ph@gmail.com
website: www.mcdonaldconsultantsinc.com
SURVEY REPORT
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF PIPELAYING ALIGNMENT
Doc No. : P2139-FR-001.0

Client : ARCADIS PHILIPPINES INC.
Address : 12th Floor Quadrants B&C, 8 Rockwell Hidalgo Drive, Rockwell Center, Bgy. Poblacion,
Makati City 1210 Philippines
Location : City of Antipolo, Province of Rizal
Revision History
Rev Date Description Author Reviewer Approver
0 12-Sept-2022 Draft R. Soriano
0 15-Aug-2023 Final R. Soriano

Makati City 1210
Tel: +632 8847-3196 +632 8986-1426
SURVEY REPORT MCDONALD CONSULTANTS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. GENERAL................................................................................................................................................. 4
1.1 THE SURVEY COMPANY ..................................................................................................................... 4
1.2 OBJECTIVE ......................................................................................................................................... 4
1.3 PROJECT SITE ..................................................................................................................................... 4
1.4 DURATION ......................................................................................................................................... 5
1.5 PERMITS ............................................................................................................................................ 5
1.6 ACRONYMS........................................................................................................................................ 5
PART II. SCOPE AND SPECIFICATIONS .................................................................................................................. 6
2.1 SCOPE OF WORKS.............................................................................................................................. 6
2.2 CONTROL REFERENCE SYSTEM.......................................................................................................... 6
2.3 EQUIPMENT USED ............................................................................................................................. 6
PART III. SURVEY METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................ 7
3.1 CONTROL ESTABLISHMENT ............................................................................................................... 7
3.1.1 MONUMENT CONTROL INSTALLATION ......................................................................................... 7
3.1.2 PROCEDURE ................................................................................................................................... 7
3.2 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ..................................................................................................................... 7
3.3 ORTHOPHOTO ACQUISITION............................................................................................................. 8
3.4 BOREHOLE SURVEY ........................................................................................................................... 8
PART IV. SURVEY RESULTS .................................................................................................................................... 9
4.1 SURVEY CONTROL ESTABLISHMENT ................................................................................................. 9
4.2 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND ORTHOPHOTO .................................................................................... 9
4.3 BOREHOLE SURVEY ......................................................................................................................... 11
APPENDIX A – BARANGAY COORDINATION LETTER .................................................................................................. 12
APPENDIX B – EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS ............................................................................................................. 14
APPENDIX C – EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES .......................................................................................... 21
APPENDIX D – CAAP CERTIFICATES ............................................................................................................................ 28
APPENDIX E – PROJECT CONTROL DESCRIPTIONS ..................................................................................................... 31
APPENDIX F – NAMRIA CONTROL CERTIFICATES ....................................................................................................... 44
APPENDIX G – NAMRIA GNSS DATA EVALUATION .................................................................................................... 51
Topographic Survey for Treated Water Transmission Line Project – Pipelaying Alignment P a g e |2
P2139-FR-001.0
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Project Coordinate System ....................................................................................................................................... 6
Table 2 List of Equipment ..................................................................................................................................................... 6
Table 3 NAMRIA Controls and Benchmarks Used ................................................................................................................. 9
Table 4 Project Control Coordinates ..................................................................................................................................... 9
Table 5 Borehole Surveyed ................................................................................................................................................. 11
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Project Site Location (Yellow) ................................................................................................................................. 4

Figure 2 Project Control Specification .................................................................................................................................. 7
Figure 3 Topographic Survey Result.................................................................................................................................... 10
P2139-FR-001.0
PART I. GENERAL
1.1 THE SURVEY COMPANY

McDonald Consultants, Inc. is an established surveying company based in Makati City, Philippines, and
is duly registered at the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2002.
MCI is a team of professional surveyors from the Philippines and Australia, with decades of experience
on a comprehensive range of projects in the Philippines and Asia-Pacific. Some of our projects involved
the utilization of the advanced technology such as Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), Light
Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), Robotic Total Station, Echo sounder and Remotely Piloted Aerial
System (RPAS).
1.2 OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to detail the methodology employed and present the results of the
topographic survey for the project.
1.3 PROJECT SITE

The project site is located in Sitio Kaysakat, Barangay San Jose, in the City of Antipolo (see Figure 1,
marked in yellow. The length of the pipelaying alignment is about 6 km, with the ROW as the corridor.
SITE
TUNNEL
PIPELAYING
FIGURE 1 PROJECT SITE LOCATION (YELLOW)
P2139-FR-001.0
1.4 DURATION
This project was conducted from May to August 2022.
1.5 PERMITS
Survey works were coordinated with the Barangay San Jose LGU, request or coordination letter in
Appendix A.
1.6 ACRONYMS
BM - Benchmark
DTM - Digital Terrain Model
ETS - Electronic Total Station
GCP - Ground Control Point
GNSS - Global Navigation Satellite System
MSL - Mean Sea Level
NAMRIA - National Mapping Resource Information Authority
PRS - Philippine Reference System
RTK - Real Time Kinematic
UAV - Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
WGS - World Geodetic System
P2139-FR-001.0
PART II. SCOPE AND SPECIFICATIONS

2.1 SCOPE OF WORKS
The scope of works for this survey project includes the following:
1. Establishment of Survey Controls;
2. Topographic Survey of the Pipe laying alignment;
3. Survey of boreholes;
4. Acquisition of Orthorectified Imagery
2.2 CONTROL REFERENCE SYSTEM
The Coordinate System used for the survey is primarily WGS84 UTM51, unless otherwise stated.
The Vertical datum is Mean Sea Level and is connected with NAMRIA Benchmark RZ-154A by
differential leveling..
Reference System WGS84 UTM51N (EPSG: 32651)
Type Grid Coordinate System
Geodetic Datum WGS84
Ellipsoid WGS84
Projection Universal Transverse Mercator
Zone 51 North
False Easting 500000
False Northing 0
Central Meridian 123
Scale Factor 0.9996
Linear Unit Meter
Vertical Datum True Mean Sea Level (Leveling from RZ-154A)
TABLE 1 PROJECT COORDINATE SYSTEM
2.3 EQUIPMENT USED
The equipment used are listed below table:
SURVEY EQUIPMENT
Sokkia Set 230RK Total Station
Sokkia Digital Level – SDL50
CHC X5 GNSS
DJI Phantom 4
TABLE 2 LIST OF EQUIPMENT
Equipment specifications are in Appendix B. Calibration certificates are in Appendix C.

MCI is a registered CAAP drone operator, see certificates in Appendix D.
P2139-FR-001.0
PART III. SURVEY METHODOLOGY

3.1 CONTROL ESTABLISHMENT
3.1.1 MONUMENT CONTROL INSTALLATION

A pair of control monuments were installed approximately 100 meters apart along the Calawis road,
the controls were placed in public locations.
The controls were installed controls on existing concrete, a 30cm x 30xm or 20cm x 20 cm thin layer
of concrete putty was added on top of the existing concrete.
Center mark of each of the control is a head of a concrete nail embedded in the concrete block or
putty and inscribed by a triangle.
20 cm
TWTL-1
20 . 22 20 cm
MWCI
FIGURE 2 PROJECT CONTROL SPECIFICATION
3.1.2 PROCEDURE
Site reconnaissance was conducted first, it was essential that locations of NAMRIA control stations
were identified and the Project Control locations were determined to assess control network
geometry.
The horizontal coordinates of the Project Controls were derived by GNSS static observation. The
controls were setup with GNSS units and observed in static with a minimum occupation time of 1 hour
each. Pairs were observed simultaneously with existing control and NAMRIA controls. Coordinates
were computed via GNSS post-processing software by NAMRIA all connected to the existing NAMRIA
reference stations.
Differential levelling was done for the elevation of the established controls, connected with the datum
of the NAMRIA Benchmark RZ-154A, located in Marcos Highway (Marilaque).
3.2 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
The methodology employed for the topographic survey was an integration of different methodology
using RTK GNSS, and the conventional method using ETS. The GNSS was used for open and clear areas,
ETS was used for detail survey and areas under dense canopy of trees and structures.
For the RTK GNSS, a Base Receiver was setup at one of the survey controls, the Rover Receivers were
then connected to the Base Receiver via Radio frequency. Real time coordinates were then observed
by means of trilateration of the Satellites with the Base Receiver and Rover Receivers.
The conventional methodology using the ETS involved the use of at least two (2) controls for proper
orientation of the equipment.
The survey points were combined to generate the DTM and the contours using a GIS software.
UAV was used for the orthophoto imagery set as basemap.
P2139-FR-001.0
For the UAV, a flight mission was prepared to cover the whole area with images of wide overlaps.
The mission was flown at 80-100 metres above the ground elevation. Prior, Photo Control Points
(PCPs) were laid out at survey grade accuracy with RTK. PCPs was used as reference for the UAV
post-processing.
3.3 ORTHOPHOTO ACQUISITION
A UAV DJI drone was used for the orthophoto imagery acquisition.
For the UAV, a flight mission was prepared to cover the whole area with images of wide overlaps.
The mission was flown at 80-100 meters above the ground elevation. Prior, Photo Control Points
(PCPs) were laid out at survey grade accuracy with RTK. PCPs was used as reference for the UAV
post-processing.
Orthorectified imagery was generated using a Photogrammetry software.
3.4 BOREHOLE SURVEY
Actual location of boreholes completed were surveyed with RTK GNSS.
P2139-FR-001.0
PART IV. SURVEY RESULTS

4.1 SURVEY CONTROL ESTABLISHMENT
NAMRIA ground controls points and benchmarks recovered and used as references for project
controls are shown in Table 3.
ELEVATION (MSL)
NAME EASTING NORTHING
Leveling PGVD2020
RZL-4582 301344.317 1630132.346 - 24.277
RZL-3119 301212.317 1630132.346 99.716 (2021) 100.012
RZ-141 - - 131.839 (2021) 132.153
RZ-154A - - 181.108 (2021) 181.257
MM-671 - - 19.5525 (2013) 19.928
TABLE 3 NAMRIA CONTROLS AND BENCHMARKS USED
NAMRIA certificates can be found in Appendix F.
The following are the coordinates of the Project Controls.
ELEVATION
NAME EASTING NORTHING
Leveling PGVD2020
API-1 310594.75 1617544.423 206.397 206.533
API-2 311234.702 1617616.133 178.360 178.503
API-3 311209.232 1618608.722 191.506 191.655
API-4 311246.625 1618749.945 185.388 185.524
API-5 311338.96 1619294.838 181.171 181.555
API-6 311352.622 1619415.232 176.635 176.827
API-7 311324.09 1620016.636 175.389 175.614
API-8 311294.758 1620132.43 176.401 176.623
API-9 311151.102 1620845.913 174.842 175.090
TWTL-1 310454.496 1617516.306 217.015 217.170
TWTL-2 311058.907 1620884.805 175.019 175.267
TABLE 4 PROJECT CONTROL COORDINATES
4.2 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND ORTHOPHOTO
The area surveyed is shown in Figure 3.
P2139-FR-001.0
FIGURE 3 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RESULT
Topographic Survey for Treated Water Transmission Line Project – Pipelaying Alignment P a g e | 10
P2139-FR-001.0
4.3 BOREHOLE SURVEY
There are 6 boreholes surveyed, as shown in Table 5.
No. BOREHOLE ID EASTING NORTHING ELEVATION

1 BH 310976.265 1617688.955 171.725
2 BH 311327.474 1617791.628 184.321
3 BH 311212.158 1618635.246 191.363
4 BH 311311.359 1620049.529 176.394
5 BH 311321.099 1620533.657 176.110
6 BH 311275.554 1620714.508 175.285
TABLE 5 BOREHOLE SURVEYED
P2139-FR-001.0
APPENDIX A – BARANGAY COORDINATION LETTER
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
APPENDIX B – EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
APPENDIX C – EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
APPENDIX D – CAAP CERTIFICATES
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
APPENDIX E – PROJECT CONTROL DESCRIPTIONS
P2139-FR-001.0
GNSS SURVEY CONTROL POINT
Location
Island: Luzon Province: Rizal Town/City: Baras Barangay: Pinugay
GRID COORDINATE GRID COORDINATES VERTICAL ELEVATION

SYSTEM Easting (m) Northing (m) DATUM MSL (m)
WGS84 UTM51N 310989.212 1617626.128 MSL (Leveling) 181.108
MSL (Geoid)
PRS92 PTM3 526262.987 1617541.936 181.257
PGVD2020
STATION DESCRIPTION
RZ-154A
The control point is located in Barangay Pinugay,
Muncipality of Baras, Province of Rizal. The station is located
along Marcos Highway. Established at the SE approach of the
3rd Concrete Bridge.
Station mark is the head of a 4-inch copper nail embedded,

centered and flushed in a 15x15 cm. cement putty with
inscriptions “RZ-154A 2021 NAMRIA”.
Date observed: May 2022

Photo:
3rd Concrete Bridge
P2139-FR-001.0
Location
Island: Luzon Province: Rizal Town/City: Antipolo Barangay: San Jose

WGS84 UTM51N 310454.496 1617516.306 MSL (Leveling*) 217.015
MSL (Geoid)
PRS92 PTM3 525729.299 1617427.428 217.170
PGVD2020
STATION DESCRIPTION
TWTL-1
The control point is located in Barangay San Jose, City of
Antipolo, Province of Rizal. The station is located along
Marcos Highway road approaching a barangay road going to
Prayer Mountain, it is about 5 m from the corner of Tayrosa
Trading Store.
Station mark is the head of a concrete nail set flush on a 30 x

30 cm. concrete putty with inscriptions “TWTL-1 2022 MWCI”.

Photo:
Prayer Mountain
*Leveling from RZ-154A
P2139-FR-001.0
Location

MSL (Geoid)
PRS92 PTM3 526304.013 1620800.855 175.267
PGVD2020
STATION DESCRIPTION
TWTL-2
Antipolo, Province of Rizal. The station is located on the
curbside of a barangay road intersection about 100m NW of
Kaysakat Elementary School.

30 cm. concrete putty with inscriptions “TWTL-2 2022 MWCI”.

Photo:
Kaysakat Elem School
P2139-FR-001.0
Location

MSL (Geoid)
PRS92 PTM3 525869.289 1617456.775 206.533
PGVD2020
STATION DESCRIPTION
API-1
Antipolo, Province of Rizal. The station is located along
Marcos Highway road in between barriers on a retaining wall
at the bend on the right side approaching Boso Boso Road.

20 cm. concrete putty with inscriptions “API-1 2022 MWCI”.

Photo:
Boso Boso Road
P2139-FR-001.0
Location

MSL (Geoid)
PRS92 PTM3 526508.537 1617534.100 178.503
PGVD2020
STATION DESCRIPTION
API-2
Antipolo, Province of Rizal. The station is located in
between barriers at the left side along Marcos Highway road
about 200m approaching Calawis Road.


Photo:
3rd Concrete Bridge
P2139-FR-001.0
Location

MSL (Geoid)
PRS92 PTM3 526474.346 1618526.356 191.655
PGVD2020
STATION DESCRIPTION
API-3
Antipolo, Province of Rizal. The station is located at the right
edge of Calawis Road about 200m approaching Athlete's
Choice, Inc. Building .


Photo:
Athlete's Choice Inc.
P2139-FR-001.0
Location

MSL (Geoid)
PRS92 PTM3 526510.493 1618667.889 185.524
PGVD2020
STATION DESCRIPTION
API-4
Antipolo, Province of Rizal. The station is located at the left
edge of Calawis Road infront of Athlete's Choice, Inc.
Building.


Photo:
Athlete's Choice Inc.
P2139-FR-001.0
Location

MSL (Geoid)
PRS92 PTM3 526598.026 1619213.533 181.555
PGVD2020
STATION DESCRIPTION
API-5
edge of Calawis Road about 100 m SW from the Barangay
Covered Court.


Photo:
Barangay
Covered Court
P2139-FR-001.0
Location

MSL (Geoid)
PRS92 PTM3 526610.628 1619334.033 176.827
PGVD2020
STATION DESCRIPTION
API-6
edge of Calawis Road in front of Barangay Covered Court.


Photo:
Barangay
Covered Court
P2139-FR-001.0
Location

MSL (Geoid)
PRS92 PTM3 526576.808 1619935.119 175.614
PGVD2020
STATION DESCRIPTION
API-7
right side of Calawis Road going to Mt. Purro, about 350m
approaching the Calawis-Kaysakat intersection.

20 cm.concrete putty with inscriptions “API-7 2022 MWCI”.

Photo:
Calawis-Kaysakat
Intersection
P2139-FR-001.0
Location

MSL (Geoid)
PRS92 PTM3 526546.460 1620050.642 176.623
PGVD2020
STATION DESCRIPTION
API-8
Antipolo, Province of Rizal. The station is located on the left
side of Calawis Road going to Mt. Purro, about 250m

20 cm concrete putty with inscriptions “API-8 2022 MWCI”.

Photo:
Calawis-Kaysakat
Intersection
P2139-FR-001.0
Location

MSL (Geoid)
PRS92 PTM3 526396.541 1620762.780 175.090
PGVD2020
STATION DESCRIPTION
API-9
Antipolo, Province of Rizal. The station is located on the side
of a barangay road about 20m NW of Kaysakat Elementary
School.


Photo:
Kaysakat Elem School
P2139-FR-001.0
APPENDIX F – NAMRIA CONTROL CERTIFICATES
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
APPENDIX G – NAMRIA GNSS DATA EVALUATION
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
P2139-FR-001.0
SURVEY REPORT
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF TUNNEL ALIGNMENT
Doc No. : P2229-FR-001.0

Client : ARCADIS PHILIPPINES INC.
Address : 12th Floor Quadrants B&C, 8 Rockwell Hidalgo Drive, Rockwell Center, Bgy. Poblacion,
Makati City 1210 Philippines
Location : City of Antipolo, Province of Rizal
Revision History
Rev Date Description Author Reviewer Approver
0 15-Jan-2023 Draft R. Soriano
0 15-Aug-2023 Final R. Soriano

Poblacion, Makati City 1210
tel: +632 8847-3196 +632 8986-1426
SURVEY REPORT MCDONALD CONSULTANTS INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. GENERAL ........................................................................................................................................................ 4
1.1 BRIEF ..................................................................................................................................................... 4
1.2 THE SURVEY COMPANY ......................................................................................................................... 4
1.3 SCOPE and OBJECTIVE ........................................................................................................................... 4
1.4 PROJECT LOCATION and DETAILS .......................................................................................................... 4
1.5 ACRONYMS............................................................................................................................................ 5
2. SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 6

2.1 REFERENCE SYSTEM .............................................................................................................................. 6
2.2 REFERENCE GEODETIC CONTROLS ........................................................................................................ 6
2.3 EQUIPMENT .......................................................................................................................................... 6
2.3.1 EQUIPMENT FOR CONTROL ESTABLISHMENT AND CHECK POINT SURVEY ...................................... 6
2.3.2 EQUIPMENT FOR TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ........................................................................................ 7
3. SURVEY METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................................ 9
3.1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ......................................................................................................................... 9
3.2 BOREHOLE SURVEY ............................................................................................................................... 9
4. DATA PROCESSING ......................................................................................................................................... 9

4.1 LiDAR POST-PROCESSING ...................................................................................................................... 9
4.2 TRAJECTORY COMPUTATION AND POINT CLOUD GEORECTIFICATION ................................................ 9
4.3 POINT CLOUD CLASSIFICATION ........................................................................................................... 10
4.4 DATA VALIDATION AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT ................................................................................. 10
5. SURVEY RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................... 11

5.1 LiDAR TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ............................................................................................................. 11
5.1.1 GROUND CONTROL POINT AND CHECK POINT SURVEY ...................................................................... 11
5.2 BOREHOLE SURVEY ............................................................................................................................. 13
6. SURVEY PERSONNEL .................................................................................................................................... 13
APPENDIX A – BARANGAY COORDINATION LETTER ............................................................................................. 14
APPENDIX B – EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS .......................................................................................................... 16
APPENDIX C – EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES ...................................................................................... 25
APPENDIX D – CAAP CERTIFICATES ....................................................................................................................... 29
APPENDIX E – PROJECT CONTROL DESCRIPTIONS ................................................................................................ 32
APPENDIX F – NAMRIA CONTROL CERTIFICATES .................................................................................................. 35
APPENDIX G – NAMRIA GNSS DATA EVALUATION ............................................................................................... 37
Topographic Survey for Treated Water Transmission Line Project – Tunnel Alignment
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e |2
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Project Coordinate System ........................................................................................................................ 6

Table 2 NAMRIA and Project Reference Geodetic Controls ................................................................................... 6
Table 3 CHC X5 Accuracies ...................................................................................................................................... 7
Table 4 DJI Zenmuse L1 Specifications ................................................................................................................... 8
Table 5 Technical Specifications of DJI Matrice 300RTK ......................................................................................... 8
Table 6 DJI D-RTK2 Specifications ........................................................................................................................... 8
Table 7 Ground Control Points for LiDAR Missions .............................................................................................. 12
Table 8 Survey Check Points Location .................................................................................................................. 12
Table 9 Borehole Coordinates .............................................................................................................................. 13
Table 10 Survey Personnel ................................................................................................................................... 13
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Project Location (Red) .............................................................................................................................. 4

Figure 2 DJI Zenmuse L1 Sensor ............................................................................................................................. 7
Figure 3 LiDAR Data Processing Workflow ............................................................................................................. 9
Figure 4 Digital Terrain Model in 3D Perspective ................................................................................................. 11
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e |3
1. GENERAL
1.1 BRIEF
This report covers the LiDAR topographic survey conducted by McDonald Consultants, Inc.
(MCI) on December 2022 for the TWTL Tunnel.
1.2 THE SURVEY COMPANY
McDonald Consultants, Inc. (MCI) is an established surveying company based in Makati City,
Philippines, and is duly registered at the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2002.
MCI is a team of professional surveyors from the Philippines and Australia, with decades of
experience on a comprehensive range of projects in the Philippines and Asia-Pacific. Some of
our projects involved the utilization of the advanced technology such as Global Navigation
Satellite System (GNSS), Terrestrial Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) Scanner, Robotic Total
Station, Echo Sounder, Remotely Piloted Aerial System (RPAS).
1.3 SCOPE and OBJECTIVE
The scope of works consists of the acquisition of the Digital Terrain Mode (DTM) of the Area of
Interest (AOIs) and the survey of completed boreholes required by the project.
1.4 PROJECT LOCATION and DETAILS
The project is located in Brgys. Calawis and San Jose, City of Antipolo (see Figure 1, marked in
red). The length of the tunnel is 6.22km, the LiDAR area has a corridor of 20m.
TUNNEL
PIPELAYING
Figure 1 PROJECT LOCATION (RED)
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e |4
1.5 ACRONYMS
AGL - Above Ground Level

AOI - Area of Interest
DTM - Digital Terrain Model
EPSG - European Petroleum Survey Group
GCP - Ground Control Point
GNSS - Global Navigation Satellite System
IMU - Inertial Measurement System
LiDAR - Light Detection and Ranging
NAMRIA - National Mapping Resource Information Authority
RPA - Remotely Piloted Aircraft
RPAS - Remotely Piloted Aircraft System
RTK - Real Time Kinematic
ToR - Terms of Reference
WGS - World Geodetic System
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e |5
2. SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS
2.1 REFERENCE SYSTEM
The horizontal coordinate system used for the survey is WGS84 UTM51N, the vertical datum
is True Mean Sea Level.
Full specifications of the reference system used is detailed in the table below.
Reference System WGS84 UTM51N (EPSG: 32651)

Type Grid Coordinate System
Geodetic Datum WGS84
Ellipsoid WGS84
Projection Universal Transverse Mercator
Zone 51 North
False Easting 500000
False Northing 0
Central Meridian 123
Scale Factor 0.9996
Linear Unit Meter
Vertical Datum True Mean Sea Level (leveling from RZ-154A)
TABLE 1 PROJECT COORDINATE SYSTEM
2.2 REFERENCE GEODETIC CONTROLS
The project controls installed and established for the project was used for the LiDAR survey
and are connected to the national grid network by the National Mapping Resource Information
Authority (NAMRIA).
ELEVATION (MSL)*
CONTROL NORTHING EASTING
Leveling
RZ-154A 1617626.128 310989.212 181.108
API-8 1620132.430 311294.758 176.401
TABLE 2 NAMRIA AND PROJECT REFERENCE GEODETIC CONTROLS
The certificates of the NAMRIA geodetic controls are provided in the Appendix C of this report.
2.3 EQUIPMENT
2.3.1 EQUIPMENT FOR CONTROL ESTABLISHMENT AND CHECK POINT SURVEY
MCI employed the use of Differential GNSS (DGNSS) for the establishment of project controls
and survey of check points.
The CHC X5 is a dual frequency GNSS with the capability to track all GNSS constellations: GPS,
GNSS, Galileo, BDS, QZSS and SBAS. It has the following accuracies:
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e |6
High Precision Static

Horizontal : 2.5 mm + 0.1 ppm RMS
Vertical : 3.5 mm + 0.4 ppm RMS
Real Time Kinematics
Horizontal: 8 mm + 1 ppm RMS
Vertical: 15mm + 1 ppm RMS
TABLE 3 CHC X5 ACCURACIES
2.3.2 EQUIPMENT FOR TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
LIDAR SENSOR
An airborne LiDAR sensor is one of the latest remote sensing technologies where the sensor
emits light pulses towards a target, in this case, the terrain surface, whilst mounted on an aerial
platform such as a Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA), to measure variable distances to the
ground. These light pulses emitted by the sensor combined with the data from an Inertial
Measurement Unit (IMU) and a high resolution RGB camera, can generate a precise, three-
dimensional map of the Earth’s surface in the form of point clouds.
The DJI Zenmuse L1 LiDAR sensor used in this survey is an integrated system consisting of a
Livox LiDAR module, a high-accuracy IMU, and an RGB camera with a 1-inch CMOS on a 3-axis
stabilized gimbal. The technical specifications of the payloads are detailed in Table 4 below.
FIGURE 2 DJI ZENMUSE L1 SENSOR
System Performance
Supported Aircraft DJI Matrice 300 RTK

450m at 80% reflectivity
Detection Range
190m at 100% reflectivity
Single Return: 240,000 pts/sec
Point Rate
Multiple Returns: 480,000 pts/sec
Horizontal: 10cm at 50m
System Accuracy (RMS 1σ)
Vertical: 5cm at 50m
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e |7
LiDAR Sensor
Ranging Accuracy (RMS 1σ) 3 cm @ 100m
Maximum Returns Supported 3
IMU
IMU Update Frequency 200 Hz

Yaw Accuracy (RMS 1σ) Real- time:0.3, Post-processing :0.15
Pitch/Roll Accuracy (RMS 1σ) Real- time:0.05, Post-processing :0.025
RGB Mapping Camera

Sensor Size 1 inch
Effective Pixels 20 MP
Aperture Range f2.8 – f/11
TABLE 4 DJI ZENMUSE L1 SPECIFICATIONS
AERIAL PLATFORM
The DJI Matrice 300 RTK is a quadcopter equipped with a built-in Real-Time Kinematic (RTK)
module and a 6-sense directional sensing system. The technical specifications of the M300RTK
are listed in Table 5.
Hovering Accuracy (P-Mode with GPS)

±0.1 m (Vision System enabled)
Vertical ±0.5 m (GPS enabled)
±0.1 m (RTK enabled)
±0.3 m (Vision System enabled)
Horizontal ±1.5 m (GPS enabled)
±0.1 m (RTK enabled)
RTK Positioning Accuracy
1 cm + 1ppm (Horizontal)
When RTK is enabled and fixed
1.5 cm + 1 ppm (Vertical)
GNSS
GPS + GLONASS + Beidou + Galileo
TABLE 5 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS OF DJI MATRICE 300RTK
BASE STATION
The DJI D-RTK 2 Mobile station is a high-precision GNSS receiver that supports all 4 major global
satellite navigation systems and provides real-time differential corrections to the positional
measurements taken with the M300RTK.
Positioning Accuracy
Single Point Horizontal：1.5 m(RMS)
Vertical：3.0 m(RMS)
RTK Horizontal：1 cm+ 1 ppm(RMS)
Vertical：2 cm+ 1 ppm(RMS)
TABLE 6 DJI D-RTK2 SPECIFICATIONS
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e |8
3. SURVEY METHODOLOGY
3.1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
The topographic survey was carried out with a LiDAR sensor mounted on an RPA platform. A
total of three (3) flight missions were flown to cover the AOI at a flying height of 80 meters
above ground level (AGL), flight speed of 5m/s and ground sampling of 2.18 cm/pixel. Flight
plans were created using the mobile app DJI Pilot 2. To ensure uniform point density and
quality of data, missions were flown at a uniform height above the ground by using the Follow
Terrain feature of the mobile application.
3.2 BOREHOLE SURVEY
Actual location of boreholes completed were surveyed with RTK GNSS.
4. DATA PROCESSING
4.1 LiDAR POST-PROCESSING
Processing of raw LiDAR data involves multiple stages of adjustment and quality checks before
producing high quality classified point cloud, DSM and DTM.
LiDAR processing workflow includes trajectory computation, point cloud georectification, point
cloud classification, data validation, quality assurance, and elevation model production.
FIGURE 3 LIDAR DATA PROCESSING WORKFLOW
4.2 TRAJECTORY COMPUTATION AND POINT CLOUD GEORECTIFICATION
The aircraft trajectory was computed by integrating the RPAS position data and the correction
from the RTK base station. The DJI Terra software was used to geo-rectify the LiDAR data by
subjecting it to adjustments provided by the IMU and flight trajectory.
Initial quality assessment was done to check for gaps, point cloud density and accuracy.
Position of ground control points measured with the RTK was compared to the position based
on the geo-rectified point cloud. The Cloud Compare software was then used when further
adjustments were necessary.
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e |9
4.3 POINT CLOUD CLASSIFICATION
Point cloud classification was carried out using the ENVI LiDAR software. The ENVI AI was able
to automatically classify the geo-rectified point cloud to different classes such as ground,
building, vegetation and powerlines. The software has a QA platform which was used to review
the results, manually change the classification, local parameters, and vectors to further
improve the point cloud classification. Once isolated, the point cloud classified as ground was
used to create a bare-earth elevation model which is the DTM.
4.4 DATA VALIDATION AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT
The DTM produced from the classified ground point cloud was checked and validated by
comparing the elevation of the survey check points measured using RTK to that of the elevation
interpolated from the DTM.
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 10
5. SURVEY RESULTS
5.1 LiDAR TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
During the data processing of the LiDAR data, a QA check was performed after georectification
to check if the resulting point cloud is oriented accurately relative to the project control
network. This is to ensure that the point cloud is in its proper location and orientation prior to
classification and DEM production.
Measured elevations of the ground control points taken with RTK during the LiDAR survey were
compared to the elevations of the same location based on the point cloud.
FIGURE 4 DIGITAL TERRAIN MODEL IN 3D PERSPECTIVE
5.1.1 GROUND CONTROL POINT AND CHECK POINT SURVEY
For the purpose of quality checking of the LiDAR survey during data processing, ground control
points and check points were measured within the AOI using RTK GNSS.
Ground control points (see Table 7) are points used in the initial quality assurance of the point
cloud georectification prior to classification. Position of these control points are placed in
strategic locations where it is clear and relatively flat within the area of interest. L-shaped white
sacks were laid on the ground and the position of the elbow corner of the sack was measured
with RTK GNSS.
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 11
Table below lists the ground control points used for georectification.
ID NORTHING EASTING RTK ELEVATION

GCP1 1620300.573 311316.609 177.617
GCP2 1620654.849 311318.973 176.775
GCP3 1621073.306 311276.435 200.996
GCP4 1621626.379 311275.232 258.847
GCP5 1622174.604 311243.007 220.044
GCP6 1622555.483 311245.796 163.593
GCP7 1622854.425 311244.181 226.813
GCP8 1623543.49 311206.241 278.604
GCP9 1624110.038 311273.509 311.391
GCP10 1624746.391 311221.250 278.860
GCP11 1625090.962 311268.259 273.364
GCP13 1626117.753 311111.951 190.831
GCP14 1626464.743 311172.494 171.845
TABLE 7 GROUND CONTROL POINTS FOR LIDAR MISSIONS
Check points (see Table 8) are points used to validate the quality of the vertical aspect of the
produced DTM. They are located in both vegetated and non-vegetated areas.
Table 8 lists the 13 survey check points used for validating the DTM.
ID NORTHING EASTING RTK ELEVATION

SCP1 1620389.696 311320.830 177.888
SCP2 1620667.594 311302.553 177.004
SCP3 1620895.326 311295.177 176.813
SCP4 1621268.02 311294.456 193.075
SCP5 1621619.669 311282.946 260.786
SCP6 1622352.586 311264.104 263.370
SCP7 1622991.497 311248.485 180.990
SCP8 1623950.846 311231.220 279.578
SCP9 1624384.511 311225.021 262.725
SCP10 1625117.543 311209.279 244.152
SCP11 1625695.892 311196.622 256.129
SCP12 1626120.997 311136.161 186.979
SCP13 1626492.641 311170.744 165.748
TABLE 8 SURVEY CHECK POINTS LOCATION
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 12
5.2 BOREHOLE SURVEY
Results are provided in Table 9 below:
BH ID NORTHING EASTING ELEVATION

BH-TN-01 1625895.983 310972.2871 229.378
BH-TN-02 1622886.151 311102.072 206.056
BH-TN-03 1621548.148 311089.611 203.659
BH-TN-04R 1625899.597 311194.042 223.528
BH-TN-06 1625534.798 311204.0771 279.589
BH-TN-10R 1624624.861 311224.4941 278.528
BH-TN-12R 1624318.139 311222.763 268.866
BH-TN-15R 1623576.168 311247.5131 307.032
BH-TN-18R 1623108.647 311255.556 242.026
BH-TN-20R 1622713.929 311265.547 181.897
BH-TN-21R 1622547.692 311271.531 164.085
BH-TN-23R 1622167.901 311250.466 219.309
BH-TN-25R 1621693.253 311341.128 261.593
BH-TN-26 1621659.857 311371.56 281.463
BH-TN-27 1621496.042 311017.61 187.631
BH-TN-27R 1621303.892 311272.799 200.676
BH-TN-28 1621257.425 311043.348 182.481
BH-TN-29R 1620964.346 311313.846 183.159
BH-TN-30 1620830.844 311044.853 173.888
BH-TN-30R 1620711.465 311275.167 175.430
BH-TN-31R 1620532.135 311330.632 176.683
BH-TN-32 1620657.071 311294.310 177.191
BH-TN-8R 1625114.022 311191.654 245.252
BH-TN-IP 1626523.013 311158.217 150.772
BH-TN-TP 1626291.317 311119.757 162.802
TABLE 9 BOREHOLE COORDINATES
6. SURVEY PERSONNEL
Below is the list of MCI personnel involved in the topographic survey:
Name of Personnel Role

Jefferson Lasaten Jr. Geodetic Engineer
Venancio Ramirez Jr Junior Surveyor
Michael Arellano Driver/Instrument Man
Bonifacio Comandante III LiDAR Team Head/Drone Operator
Pacifico Oseo Jr Survey Assistant
Michael Pocholo Bono Survey Assistant
Virgilio Argota Jr. Survey Assistant
TABLE 10 SURVEY PERSONNEL
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 13
APPENDIX A – BARANGAY COORDINATION LETTER
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 14
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 15
APPENDIX B – EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 16
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 17
DJI ZENMUSE L1
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 18
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 19
DJI MATRICE 300RK
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 20
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 21
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 22
DJI D-RTK2
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 23
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 24
APPENDIX C – EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 25
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 26
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 27
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 28
APPENDIX D – CAAP CERTIFICATES
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 29
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 30
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 31
APPENDIX E – PROJECT CONTROL DESCRIPTIONS
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 32
Location
Island: Luzon Province: Rizal Town/City: Baras Barangay: Pinugay

WGS84 UTM51N 310989.212 1617626.128 MSL (Leveling) 181.108
MSL (Geoid)
PRS92 PTM3 526262.987 1617541.936 181.257
PGVD2020
STATION DESCRIPTION
RZ-154A
The control point is located in Barangay Pinugay,
Muncipality of Baras, Province of Rizal. The station is located
along Marcos Highway. Established at the SE approach of the
3rd Concrete Bridge.
Station mark is the head of a 4-inch copper nail embedded,

centered and flushed in a 15x15 cm. cement putty with
inscriptions “RZ-154A 2021 NAMRIA”.

Photo:
3rd Concrete Bridge
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 33
Location

MSL (Geoid)
PRS92 PTM3 526546.460 1620050.642 176.623
PGVD2020
STATION DESCRIPTION
API-8
Antipolo, Province of Rizal. The station is located on the left
side of Calawis Road going to Mt. Purro, about 250m

20 cm concrete putty with inscriptions “API-8 2022 MWCI”.

Photo:
Calawis-Kaysakat
Intersection
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 34
APPENDIX F – NAMRIA CONTROL CERTIFICATES
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 35
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 36
APPENDIX G – NAMRIA GNSS DATA EVALUATION
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 37
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 38
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 39
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 40
P2229-FR-001.0 P a g e | 41

TWTL Survey Report - Rev001

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

TWTL Survey Report - Rev001

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TREATED WATER TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT

SURVEY REPORT TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF

Client : Arcadis Philippines, Inc.

Unit 201 Ferros Bel-Air Tower Condominium

Doc No. : P2139-FR-001.0

Rev Date Description Author Reviewer Approver

0 12-Sept-2022 Draft R. Soriano

0 15-Aug-2023 Final R. Soriano

Unit 201 Ferros Bel-Air Tower Condominium

Figure 1 Project Site Location (Yellow) ................................................................................................................................. 4

1.1 THE SURVEY COMPANY

1.3 PROJECT SITE

FIGURE 1 PROJECT SITE LOCATION (YELLOW)

PART II. SCOPE AND SPECIFICATIONS

1. Establishment of Survey Controls;

2. Topographic Survey of the Pipe laying alignment;

4. Acquisition of Orthorectified Imagery

2.2 CONTROL REFERENCE SYSTEM

2.3 EQUIPMENT USED

The equipment used are listed below table:

Sokkia Set 230RK Total Station

Sokkia Digital Level – SDL50

TABLE 2 LIST OF EQUIPMENT

Equipment specifications are in Appendix B. Calibration certificates are in Appendix C.

PART III. SURVEY METHODOLOGY

3.1.1 MONUMENT CONTROL INSTALLATION

FIGURE 2 PROJECT CONTROL SPECIFICATION

3.2 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY

3.3 ORTHOPHOTO ACQUISITION

3.4 BOREHOLE SURVEY

Actual location of boreholes completed were surveyed with RTK GNSS.

PART IV. SURVEY RESULTS

NAMRIA certificates can be found in Appendix F.

The following are the coordinates of the Project Controls.

4.2 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND ORTHOPHOTO

The area surveyed is shown in Figure 3.

FIGURE 3 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RESULT

4.3 BOREHOLE SURVEY

There are 6 boreholes surveyed, as shown in Table 5.

No. BOREHOLE ID EASTING NORTHING ELEVATION

APPENDIX A – BARANGAY COORDINATION LETTER

APPENDIX B – EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS

APPENDIX C – EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES

APPENDIX D – CAAP CERTIFICATES

APPENDIX E – PROJECT CONTROL DESCRIPTIONS

GNSS SURVEY CONTROL POINT

Island: Luzon Province: Rizal Town/City: Baras Barangay: Pinugay

GRID COORDINATE GRID COORDINATES VERTICAL ELEVATION

Station mark is the head of a 4-inch copper nail embedded,

Date observed: May 2022

3rd Concrete Bridge

GNSS SURVEY CONTROL POINT

Island: Luzon Province: Rizal Town/City: Antipolo Barangay: San Jose

GRID COORDINATE GRID COORDINATES VERTICAL ELEVATION

Station mark is the head of a concrete nail set flush on a 30 x

Date observed: May 2022

*Leveling from RZ-154A

GNSS SURVEY CONTROL POINT

Island: Luzon Province: Rizal Town/City: Antipolo Barangay: San Jose

GRID COORDINATE GRID COORDINATES VERTICAL ELEVATION

Station mark is the head of a concrete nail set flush on a 30 x

Date observed: May 2022

Kaysakat Elem School