EVALUATION | FINAL DEFENSE

Research Title

Name & Section of

Researchers

* Note: Excellent: 5 Very Good: 4 Good: 3 Fair: 2 Poor: 1

Actual Marks
Weight Marks (B)
Item Evaluation Criteria
(A) (1 - 5)* (A) 

Introduction
1. 30
(Background information, problem statements, aims/objectives)

Research Methodology
3. 30
(Description of method, data gathering procedure, etc.)
Findings and Conclusion
3. (presentation – statistical analysis, graphs, tables, summary of 30
results, strength of analysis, etc.)
Overall Performance
4. 10
(Presentation skills, shows confidence during Q&A session, etc.)

Total
100
(Note: The marks are as guidance for examiner to make the overall decision)

OVERALL DECISION □ SATISFACTORY □ SATISFACTORY □ UNSATISFACTORY # #

(Tick  the appropriate box) With minor amendments/ (less than 50 marks)
comments to improve the
contents of the research paper

#
written comments must be provided if decision is either one of these two categories.
Comments:

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

Signature of Evaluator: ______________________

Name of Evaluator: ________________________ Date: ___________________