Assessment Form for Oral Presentation

Title: Date:
Name: Muhammad Arif Assessor & Def Primal
Affiliation: Signature

Score x Performance Levels and Descriptors

Criteria Score Weight
Weight 4: Excellent 3: Good 2: Fair 1: Poor
2 - Visual aids are easy to read, follow the - Not follow the rule of nine, but - Visual aids are difficult to read - Visual aids even
rule of nine (9 lines/ slide, 9 still easy to read. in some parts, but it does not interfere with the
words/line). - Use series of bullet points. interfere with the presentation.
- Use of series of bullet points directs presentation. - Topics switch back
Visual - Proper use of fonts, figures, and
the audience to specific keywords. tables. - Some part(s) of the and forth,
Aids and presentation are out of order confusing.
2 - Proper use of fonts, figures, and - Presentation has a good
Organi- (not sequential).
zation tables (color, size & place). organization, just needs minor
- Presentation is well-organized, follows improvement in some parts.
the established standard (e.g.,
CON- background, problem statement,
TENT objectives, conceptual framework,
methods, results, discussion, and
conclusion).
3 - The explanation is accurate and complete. - The explanation is accurate - The main idea is not - The main idea is not
- The main idea is easy to follow but incomplete. easily identifiable. clear.
Explana-
3 and understand. - The main idea can be identified. - Audiences cannot add new - Audiences do not
tion
- Adding new insights into the topic. - Audiences can learn the facts insights into the topic. learn anything or
implied, but not add new insights even misleading.
into the topic.
3 - Presenter demonstrates full - Presenter is at ease with - Presenter is uncomfortable - Presenter cannot
Compre-
5 knowledge by answering all questions expected answers to all with questions and is able to answer all questions.
hension
with explanations and elaboration. questions, without answer only simple
elaboration. questions.
2 - Clear and audible voice. - Voice is clear, but volume - Often mumbling. - Inaudible or too loud.
Precise pronunciation of declined in some parts. - Incorrectly pronounces Monotone.
VER-
BAL & Speech, terms. - Pronounces most terms correctly. most terms. - Incorrectly pronounces
NON and Eye - Consistent use of direct eye - Minimal eye contact with most terms.
2 - Holds attention of entire audience with
VER- Contact contact with the audience, but the audience, while reading - No eye contact, the
the use of direct eye contact.
BAL still returns to notes. mostly from the notes. entire report is read from
SKILLS notes.
Total Score: Areas of improvement (feedback for presenter):
Mark [(Total Score/48) x 100]:
3rdInternational Conference on Digital Technology, Pharmacy, Health and Social
Sciences
Assessment Form for Oral Presentation

3rdInternational Conference on Digital Technology, Pharmacy, Health and Social

Sciences
Assessment Form for Oral Presentation
Title: Date:
Name: Falerisiska Yunere Assessor & Def Primal
Affiliation: Signature

Score x Performance Levels and Descriptors

Criteria Score Weight
Weight 4: Excellent 3: Good 2: Fair 1: Poor
2 - Visual aids are easy to read, follow the - Not follow the rule of nine, but - Visual aids are difficult to read - Visual aids even
rule of nine (9 lines/ slide, 9 still easy to read. in some parts, but it does not interfere with the
words/line). - Use series of bullet points. interfere with the presentation.
- Use of series of bullet points directs presentation. - Topics switch back
Visual - Proper use of fonts, figures, and
the audience to specific keywords. tables. - Some part(s) of the and forth,
Aids and presentation are out of order confusing.
2 - Proper use of fonts, figures, and - Presentation has a good
Organi- (not sequential).
zation tables (color, size & place). organization, just needs minor
- Presentation is well-organized, follows improvement in some parts.
the established standard (e.g.,
CON- background, problem statement,
TENT objectives, conceptual framework,
methods, results, discussion, and
conclusion).
3 - The explanation is accurate and complete. - The explanation is accurate - The main idea is not - The main idea is not clear.
- The main idea is easy to follow but incomplete. easily identifiable. - Audiences do not
Explana-
3 and understand. - The main idea can be identified. - Audiences cannot add new learn anything or
tion
- Adding new insights into the topic. - Audiences can learn the facts insights into the topic. even misleading.
implied, but not add new insights
into the topic.
3 - Presenter demonstrates full - Presenter is at ease with - Presenter is uncomfortable - Presenter cannot
Compre-
5 knowledge by answering all questions expected answers to all with questions and is able to answer all questions.
hension
with explanations and elaboration. questions, without answer only simple
elaboration. questions.
3 - Clear and audible voice. - Voice is clear, but volume - Often mumbling. - Inaudible or too loud.
Precise pronunciation of declined in some parts. - Incorrectly pronounces Monotone.
VER-
BAL & Speech, terms. - Pronounces most terms correctly. most terms. - Incorrectly pronounces
NON and Eye - Consistent use of direct eye - Minimal eye contact with most terms.
2 - Holds attention of entire audience with
VER- Contact contact with the audience, but the audience, while reading - No eye contact, the entire
the use of direct eye contact.
BAL still returns to notes. mostly from the notes. report is read from notes.
SKILLS
Total Score: Areas of improvement (feedback for presenter):

3rdInternational Conference on Digital Technology, Pharmacy, Health and Social

Sciences
Assessment Form for Oral Presentation
Title: Date:
Name: Athica Oviana Assessor &
Affiliation: Signature

Score x Performance Levels and Descriptors

Criteria Score Weight
Weight 4: Excellent 3: Good 2: Fair 1: Poor
2 - Visual aids are easy to read, follow the - Not follow the rule of nine, but - Visual aids are difficult to read - Visual aids even
rule of nine (9 lines/ slide, 9 still easy to read. in some parts, but it does not interfere with the
words/line). - Use series of bullet points. interfere with the presentation.
- Use of series of bullet points directs presentation. - Topics switch back
Visual - Proper use of fonts, figures, and
the audience to specific keywords. tables. - Some part(s) of the and forth,
Aids and presentation are out of order confusing.
2 - Proper use of fonts, figures, and - Presentation has a good
Organi- (not sequential).
zation tables (color, size & place). organization, just needs minor
- Presentation is well-organized, follows improvement in some parts.
the established standard (e.g.,
CON- background, problem statement,
TENT objectives, conceptual framework,
methods, results, discussion, and
conclusion).
3 - The explanation is accurate and complete. - The explanation is accurate - The main idea is not - The main idea is not clear.
- The main idea is easy to follow but incomplete. easily identifiable. - Audiences do not
Explana-
3 and understand. - The main idea can be identified. - Audiences cannot add new learn anything or
tion
- Adding new insights into the topic. - Audiences can learn the facts insights into the topic. even misleading.
implied, but not add new insights
into the topic.
2 - Presenter demonstrates full - Presenter is at ease with - Presenter is uncomfortable - Presenter cannot
Compre-
5 knowledge by answering all questions expected answers to all with questions and is able to answer all questions.
hension
with explanations and elaboration. questions, without answer only simple
elaboration. questions.
2 - Clear and audible voice. - Voice is clear, but volume - Often mumbling. - Inaudible or too loud.
Precise pronunciation of declined in some parts. - Incorrectly pronounces Monotone.
VER-
BAL & Speech, terms. - Pronounces most terms correctly. most terms. - Incorrectly pronounces
NON and Eye - Consistent use of direct eye - Minimal eye contact with most terms.
2 - Holds attention of entire audience with
VER- Contact contact with the audience, but the audience, while reading - No eye contact, the entire
the use of direct eye contact.
BAL still returns to notes. mostly from the notes. report is read from notes.
SKILLS
Total Score: Areas of improvement (feedback for presenter):

3rdInternational Conference on Digital Technology, Pharmacy, Health and Social

Sciences
Assessment Form for Oral Presentation
Title: Date:
Name: Millia Anggraini Assessor &
Affiliation: Signature

Score x Performance Levels and Descriptors

Criteria Score Weight
Weight 4: Excellent 3: Good 2: Fair 1: Poor
2 - Visual aids are easy to read, follow the - Not follow the rule of nine, but - Visual aids are difficult to read - Visual aids even
rule of nine (9 lines/ slide, 9 still easy to read. in some parts, but it does not interfere with the
words/line). - Use series of bullet points. interfere with the presentation.
- Use of series of bullet points directs presentation. - Topics switch back
Visual - Proper use of fonts, figures, and
the audience to specific keywords. tables. - Some part(s) of the and forth,
Aids and presentation are out of order confusing.
2 - Proper use of fonts, figures, and - Presentation has a good
Organi- (not sequential).
zation tables (color, size & place). organization, just needs minor
- Presentation is well-organized, follows improvement in some parts.
the established standard (e.g.,
CON- background, problem statement,
TENT objectives, conceptual framework,
methods, results, discussion, and
conclusion).
2 - The explanation is accurate and complete. - The explanation is accurate - The main idea is not - The main idea is not clear.
- The main idea is easy to follow but incomplete. easily identifiable. - Audiences do not
Explana-
3 and understand. - The main idea can be identified. - Audiences cannot add new learn anything or
tion
- Adding new insights into the topic. - Audiences can learn the facts insights into the topic. even misleading.
implied, but not add new insights
into the topic.
2 - Presenter demonstrates full - Presenter is at ease with - Presenter is uncomfortable - Presenter cannot
Compre-
5 knowledge by answering all questions expected answers to all with questions and is able to answer all questions.
hension
with explanations and elaboration. questions, without answer only simple
elaboration. questions.
2 - Clear and audible voice. - Voice is clear, but volume - Often mumbling. - Inaudible or too loud.
Precise pronunciation of declined in some parts. - Incorrectly pronounces Monotone.
VER-
BAL & Speech, terms. - Pronounces most terms correctly. most terms. - Incorrectly pronounces
NON and Eye - Consistent use of direct eye - Minimal eye contact with most terms.
2 - Holds attention of entire audience with
VER- Contact contact with the audience, but the audience, while reading - No eye contact, the entire
the use of direct eye contact.
BAL still returns to notes. mostly from the notes. report is read from notes.
SKILLS
Total Score: Areas of improvement (feedback for presenter):

3rdInternational Conference on Digital Technology, Pharmacy, Health and Social

Sciences
Assessment Form for Oral Presentation
Title: Date:
Name: Assessor &
Affiliation: Signature

Score x Performance Levels and Descriptors

Criteria Score Weight
Weight 4: Excellent 3: Good 2: Fair 1: Poor
- Visual aids are easy to read, follow the - Not follow the rule of nine, but - Visual aids are difficult to read - Visual aids even
rule of nine (9 lines/ slide, 9 still easy to read. in some parts, but it does not interfere with the
words/line). - Use series of bullet points. interfere with the presentation.
- Use of series of bullet points directs presentation. - Topics switch back
Visual - Proper use of fonts, figures, and
the audience to specific keywords. tables. - Some part(s) of the and forth,
Aids and presentation are out of order confusing.
2 - Proper use of fonts, figures, and - Presentation has a good
Organi- (not sequential).
zation tables (color, size & place). organization, just needs minor
- Presentation is well-organized, follows improvement in some parts.
the established standard (e.g.,
CON- background, problem statement,
TENT objectives, conceptual framework,
methods, results, discussion, and
conclusion).
- The explanation is accurate and complete. - The explanation is accurate - The main idea is not - The main idea is not clear.
- The main idea is easy to follow but incomplete. easily identifiable. - Audiences do not
Explana-
3 and understand. - The main idea can be identified. - Audiences cannot add new learn anything or
tion
- Adding new insights into the topic. - Audiences can learn the facts insights into the topic. even misleading.
implied, but not add new insights
into the topic.
- Presenter demonstrates full - Presenter is at ease with - Presenter is uncomfortable - Presenter cannot
Compre-
5 knowledge by answering all questions expected answers to all with questions and is able to answer all questions.
hension
with explanations and elaboration. questions, without answer only simple
elaboration. questions.
- Clear and audible voice. - Voice is clear, but volume - Often mumbling. - Inaudible or too loud.
Precise pronunciation of declined in some parts. - Incorrectly pronounces Monotone.
VER-
BAL & Speech, terms. - Pronounces most terms correctly. most terms. - Incorrectly pronounces
NON and Eye - Consistent use of direct eye - Minimal eye contact with most terms.
2 - Holds attention of entire audience with
VER- Contact contact with the audience, but the audience, while reading - No eye contact, the entire
the use of direct eye contact.
BAL still returns to notes. mostly from the notes. report is read from notes.
SKILLS
Total Score: Areas of improvement (feedback for presenter):

3rdInternational Conference on Digital Technology, Pharmacy, Health and Social

Sciences
Assessment Form for Oral Presentation
Title: Date:
Name: Assessor &
Affiliation: Signature

Score x Performance Levels and Descriptors

Criteria Score Weight
Weight 4: Excellent 3: Good 2: Fair 1: Poor
- Visual aids are easy to read, follow the - Not follow the rule of nine, but - Visual aids are difficult to read - Visual aids even
rule of nine (9 lines/ slide, 9 still easy to read. in some parts, but it does not interfere with the
words/line). - Use series of bullet points. interfere with the presentation.
- Use of series of bullet points directs presentation. - Topics switch back
Visual - Proper use of fonts, figures, and
the audience to specific keywords. tables. - Some part(s) of the and forth,
Aids and presentation are out of order confusing.
2 - Proper use of fonts, figures, and - Presentation has a good
Organi- (not sequential).
zation tables (color, size & place). organization, just needs minor
- Presentation is well-organized, follows improvement in some parts.
the established standard (e.g.,
CON- background, problem statement,
TENT objectives, conceptual framework,
methods, results, discussion, and
conclusion).
- The explanation is accurate and complete. - The explanation is accurate - The main idea is not - The main idea is not clear.
- The main idea is easy to follow but incomplete. easily identifiable. - Audiences do not
Explana-
3 and understand. - The main idea can be identified. - Audiences cannot add new learn anything or
tion
- Adding new insights into the topic. - Audiences can learn the facts insights into the topic. even misleading.
implied, but not add new insights
into the topic.
- Presenter demonstrates full - Presenter is at ease with - Presenter is uncomfortable - Presenter cannot
Compre-
5 knowledge by answering all questions expected answers to all with questions and is able to answer all questions.
hension
with explanations and elaboration. questions, without answer only simple
elaboration. questions.
- Clear and audible voice. - Voice is clear, but volume - Often mumbling. - Inaudible or too loud.
Precise pronunciation of declined in some parts. - Incorrectly pronounces Monotone.
VER-
BAL & Speech, terms. - Pronounces most terms correctly. most terms. - Incorrectly pronounces
NON and Eye - Consistent use of direct eye - Minimal eye contact with most terms.
2 - Holds attention of entire audience with
VER- Contact contact with the audience, but the audience, while reading - No eye contact, the entire
the use of direct eye contact.
BAL still returns to notes. mostly from the notes. report is read from notes.
SKILLS
Total Score: Areas of improvement (feedback for presenter):

3rdInternational Conference on Digital Technology, Pharmacy, Health and Social

Sciences
Assessment Form for Oral Presentation
Title: Date:
Name: Assessor &
Affiliation: Signature

Score x Performance Levels and Descriptors

Criteria Score Weight
Weight 4: Excellent 3: Good 2: Fair 1: Poor
- Visual aids are easy to read, follow the - Not follow the rule of nine, but - Visual aids are difficult to read - Visual aids even
rule of nine (9 lines/ slide, 9 still easy to read. in some parts, but it does not interfere with the
words/line). - Use series of bullet points. interfere with the presentation.
- Use of series of bullet points directs presentation. - Topics switch back
Visual - Proper use of fonts, figures, and
the audience to specific keywords. tables. - Some part(s) of the and forth,
Aids and presentation are out of order confusing.
2 - Proper use of fonts, figures, and - Presentation has a good
Organi- (not sequential).
zation tables (color, size & place). organization, just needs minor
- Presentation is well-organized, follows improvement in some parts.
the established standard (e.g.,
CON- background, problem statement,
TENT objectives, conceptual framework,
methods, results, discussion, and
conclusion).
- The explanation is accurate and complete. - The explanation is accurate - The main idea is not - The main idea is not clear.
- The main idea is easy to follow but incomplete. easily identifiable. - Audiences do not
Explana-
3 and understand. - The main idea can be identified. - Audiences cannot add new learn anything or
tion
- Adding new insights into the topic. - Audiences can learn the facts insights into the topic. even misleading.
implied, but not add new insights
into the topic.
- Presenter demonstrates full - Presenter is at ease with - Presenter is uncomfortable - Presenter cannot
Compre-
5 knowledge by answering all questions expected answers to all with questions and is able to answer all questions.
hension
with explanations and elaboration. questions, without answer only simple
elaboration. questions.
- Clear and audible voice. - Voice is clear, but volume - Often mumbling. - Inaudible or too loud.
Precise pronunciation of declined in some parts. - Incorrectly pronounces Monotone.
VER-
BAL & Speech, terms. - Pronounces most terms correctly. most terms. - Incorrectly pronounces
NON and Eye - Consistent use of direct eye - Minimal eye contact with most terms.
2 - Holds attention of entire audience with
VER- Contact contact with the audience, but the audience, while reading - No eye contact, the entire
the use of direct eye contact.
BAL still returns to notes. mostly from the notes. report is read from notes.
SKILLS
Total Score: Areas of improvement (feedback for presenter):

3rdInternational Conference on Digital Technology, Pharmacy, Health and Social

Sciences
Assessment Form for Oral Presentation
Title: Date:
Name: Assessor &
Affiliation: Signature

Score x Performance Levels and Descriptors

Criteria Score Weight
Weight 4: Excellent 3: Good 2: Fair 1: Poor
- Visual aids are easy to read, follow the - Not follow the rule of nine, but - Visual aids are difficult to read - Visual aids even
rule of nine (9 lines/ slide, 9 still easy to read. in some parts, but it does not interfere with the
words/line). - Use series of bullet points. interfere with the presentation.
- Use of series of bullet points directs presentation. - Topics switch back
Visual - Proper use of fonts, figures, and
the audience to specific keywords. tables. - Some part(s) of the and forth,
Aids and presentation are out of order confusing.
2 - Proper use of fonts, figures, and - Presentation has a good
Organi- (not sequential).
zation tables (color, size & place). organization, just needs minor
- Presentation is well-organized, follows improvement in some parts.
the established standard (e.g.,
CON- background, problem statement,
TENT objectives, conceptual framework,
methods, results, discussion, and
conclusion).
- The explanation is accurate and complete. - The explanation is accurate - The main idea is not - The main idea is not clear.
- The main idea is easy to follow but incomplete. easily identifiable. - Audiences do not
Explana-
3 and understand. - The main idea can be identified. - Audiences cannot add new learn anything or
tion
- Adding new insights into the topic. - Audiences can learn the facts insights into the topic. even misleading.
implied, but not add new insights
into the topic.
- Presenter demonstrates full - Presenter is at ease with - Presenter is uncomfortable - Presenter cannot
Compre-
5 knowledge by answering all questions expected answers to all with questions and is able to answer all questions.
hension
with explanations and elaboration. questions, without answer only simple
elaboration. questions.
- Clear and audible voice. - Voice is clear, but volume - Often mumbling. - Inaudible or too loud.
Precise pronunciation of declined in some parts. - Incorrectly pronounces Monotone.
VER-
BAL & Speech, terms. - Pronounces most terms correctly. most terms. - Incorrectly pronounces
NON and Eye - Consistent use of direct eye - Minimal eye contact with most terms.
2 - Holds attention of entire audience with
VER- Contact contact with the audience, but the audience, while reading - No eye contact, the entire
the use of direct eye contact.
BAL still returns to notes. mostly from the notes. report is read from notes.
SKILLS
Total Score: Areas of improvement (feedback for presenter):

3rdInternational Conference on Digital Technology, Pharmacy, Health and Social

Sciences
Assessment Form for Oral Presentation
Title: Date:
Name: Assessor &
Affiliation: Signature

Score x Performance Levels and Descriptors

Criteria Score Weight
Weight 4: Excellent 3: Good 2: Fair 1: Poor
- Visual aids are easy to read, follow the - Not follow the rule of nine, but - Visual aids are difficult to read - Visual aids even
rule of nine (9 lines/ slide, 9 still easy to read. in some parts, but it does not interfere with the
words/line). - Use series of bullet points. interfere with the presentation.
- Use of series of bullet points directs presentation. - Topics switch back
Visual - Proper use of fonts, figures, and
the audience to specific keywords. tables. - Some part(s) of the and forth,
Aids and presentation are out of order confusing.
2 - Proper use of fonts, figures, and - Presentation has a good
Organi- (not sequential).
zation tables (color, size & place). organization, just needs minor
- Presentation is well-organized, follows improvement in some parts.
the established standard (e.g.,
CON- background, problem statement,
TENT objectives, conceptual framework,
methods, results, discussion, and
conclusion).
- The explanation is accurate and complete. - The explanation is accurate - The main idea is not - The main idea is not clear.
- The main idea is easy to follow but incomplete. easily identifiable. - Audiences do not
Explana-
3 and understand. - The main idea can be identified. - Audiences cannot add new learn anything or
tion
- Adding new insights into the topic. - Audiences can learn the facts insights into the topic. even misleading.
implied, but not add new insights
into the topic.
- Presenter demonstrates full - Presenter is at ease with - Presenter is uncomfortable - Presenter cannot
Compre-
5 knowledge by answering all questions expected answers to all with questions and is able to answer all questions.
hension
with explanations and elaboration. questions, without answer only simple
elaboration. questions.
- Clear and audible voice. - Voice is clear, but volume - Often mumbling. - Inaudible or too loud.
Precise pronunciation of declined in some parts. - Incorrectly pronounces Monotone.
VER-
BAL & Speech, terms. - Pronounces most terms correctly. most terms. - Incorrectly pronounces
NON and Eye - Consistent use of direct eye - Minimal eye contact with most terms.
2 - Holds attention of entire audience with
VER- Contact contact with the audience, but the audience, while reading - No eye contact, the entire
the use of direct eye contact.
BAL still returns to notes. mostly from the notes. report is read from notes.
SKILLS
Total Score: Areas of improvement (feedback for presenter):

3rdInternational Conference on Digital Technology, Pharmacy, Health and Social

Sciences
Assessment Form for Oral Presentation
Title: Date:
Name: Assessor &
Affiliation: Signature

Score x Performance Levels and Descriptors

Criteria Score Weight
Weight 4: Excellent 3: Good 2: Fair 1: Poor
- Visual aids are easy to read, follow the - Not follow the rule of nine, but - Visual aids are difficult to read - Visual aids even
rule of nine (9 lines/ slide, 9 still easy to read. in some parts, but it does not interfere with the
words/line). - Use series of bullet points. interfere with the presentation.
- Use of series of bullet points directs presentation. - Topics switch back
Visual - Proper use of fonts, figures, and
the audience to specific keywords. tables. - Some part(s) of the and forth,
Aids and presentation are out of order confusing.
2 - Proper use of fonts, figures, and - Presentation has a good
Organi- (not sequential).
zation tables (color, size & place). organization, just needs minor
- Presentation is well-organized, follows improvement in some parts.
the established standard (e.g.,
CON- background, problem statement,
TENT objectives, conceptual framework,
methods, results, discussion, and
conclusion).
- The explanation is accurate and complete. - The explanation is accurate - The main idea is not - The main idea is not
- The main idea is easy to follow but incomplete. easily identifiable. clear.
Explana-
3 and understand. - The main idea can be identified. - Audiences cannot add new - Audiences do not
tion
- Adding new insights into the topic. - Audiences can learn the facts insights into the topic. learn anything or
implied, but not add new insights even misleading.
into the topic.
- Presenter demonstrates full - Presenter is at ease with - Presenter is uncomfortable - Presenter cannot
Compre-
5 knowledge by answering all questions expected answers to all with questions and is able to answer all questions.
hension
with explanations and elaboration. questions, without answer only simple
elaboration. questions.
- Clear and audible voice. - Voice is clear, but volume - Often mumbling. - Inaudible or too loud.
Precise pronunciation of declined in some parts. - Incorrectly pronounces Monotone.
VER-
BAL & Speech, terms. - Pronounces most terms correctly. most terms. - Incorrectly pronounces
NON and Eye - Consistent use of direct eye - Minimal eye contact with most terms.
2 - Holds attention of entire audience with
VER- Contact contact with the audience, but the audience, while reading - No eye contact, the
the use of direct eye contact.
BAL still returns to notes. mostly from the notes. entire report is read from
SKILLS notes.
Total Score: Areas of improvement (feedback for presenter):

3rdInternational Conference on Digital Technology, Pharmacy, Health and Social

Sciences
Assessment Form for Oral Presentation

3rdInternational Conference on Digital Technology, Pharmacy, Health and Social

Sciences