You are on page 1of 2

STANDARD TECHNICAL/INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR MANUFACTURED ITEMS (ON-PLOT) Doc No: ITR/MESC/74-002/CS (Smls)

CS PIPES -ASTM A106:2014- MESC SPE 74/002:2016 (Not for stock items) Rev: 0

Inspection Involvement

Claues Activity Applicable Evaluation Sampling Vendor/ PDO/ TPI (Note Std Reference/Controlling of Documents
19)
supplier Refer Annxure

1 Approval documents:
Inspection and Testing Procedures
1.1 Review / Approval As per scope Approval PDO PO, MESC 74/002, ASTM Stnds
(Heating and Heat Treatment, Hydrotest, NDT)
2 Incoming Material Inspection (Note 7)
Review of Incoming Material certificates
PO, MESC 74/002, ASTM Stds, NACE MR-0175 / ISO
2.1 (C - 0.23% Max, CE - 0.43% Max, Mn/S ratio >5) MTC's Review 100% H
15156
(S <0.010 for Sour service)

2.2 Visual Inspection & Material identification Visual 100% H PO, Test Certificates, MESC 74/002, ASTM Stnds

2.3 Check Test on incoming materials Check Analysis Per Heat/Lot H MESC, ASTM Stds, NACE MR-0175 / ISO 15156
3 Production of Pipes
Section Temperature (Meter Optical Pyrometer)
3.1 Billet heating and Piercing Induction Furnace or Gas Furnace 100% H
MESC & ASTM Stds
As per MESC / Material
3.2 Heat treatment (Note 17) All Pipes H MESC 74/002, ASTM Stds, HT Chart
specification requirement
4 Testing of Pipes (Note 7)
As per MESC / Material
4.1 Sampling and stamping of Test piece for testing Per Heat H ASTM A370, MESC 74/002 and ASTM Stds
specification requirement
Chemical & Mechanical MESC 74/002, ASTM A 370, NACE MR-0175 / ISO
4.2 Lab Testing Per Heat/Lot H
properties 15156
Impact Enery as table6 of MESC MESC 74/002, ASTM A 370, NACE MR-0175 / ISO
4.3 Impact Testing.(If Mn/C ratio < 5, Impact is required) Per Heat/Lot H
74/002 15156
MESC 74/002, ASTM Stds, Testing Procedures.
4.4 Hydrostatic Testing Leakage Check All Pipes H
MESC 74/002, ASTM Stds, UT Procedure, ASME Sec V,
4.5 Non Destructive Electric Test (Note 18) Volumetric defects All Pipes H
Art 8
5 Bare Pipes Visual and Dimensional Inspection
5.1 Visual Inspection of Pipes. Visual 100% H MESC 74/002, ASTM Stds

5.2 Dimensional Inspection (SRL /DRL, Thickness, ID and OD) As per Drawing 100% H MESC 74/002, ASTM Stds, ASME B 36.10

5.3 Bevel Check As per Drawing 100% H MESC 74/002, ASTM Stds, ASME B16.25
All pipes shall pass Body OD, ID and ID out of
5.4 Gauge Checking As per Drawing 100% H
Roundness gauge Inspections
6 Surface Treatment and Marking of Pipes (Note 7)
Check Coating thickness and
6.1 Galvanising (If applicable) 100% H Galvanising shall be accordance with ASTM A 53
weight
Stencil marking and Paint
6.2 Marking of Pipes (Including the heat number, charge/heat number) 100% H MESC 74/002, ASTM Stds and PO
stenciling

Page 1 of 2
STANDARD TECHNICAL/INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR MANUFACTURED ITEMS (ON-PLOT) Doc No: ITR/MESC/74-002/CS (Smls)
CS PIPES -ASTM A106:2014- MESC SPE 74/002:2016 (Not for stock items) Rev: 0

Inspection Involvement

Claues Activity Applicable Evaluation Sampling Vendor/ PDO/ TPI (Note Std Reference/Controlling of Documents
19)
supplier Refer Annxure

7 Final Inspection of Pipes (Note 7)


Free from Radial Offsets, Dents, Flat spots, Cracks and
7.1 Visual & Surface Condition Inspection Visual Inspection 100% H
mechanical marks

7.2 Inspection of markings such as Size, Class, Mtrl, Heat No. Sch, Std, make, etc. Marking Verification 100% H MESC 74/002 & ASTM Stds

Preservation checks and Approved package procedure / seaworthy packing as


8 Preservation & Packing Inspection 100% H
Quantity/Bundle Verification applicable

PO, MTC's, Test reports, NDT Reports (EN 10204 type


9 Final Documentation Review and IRN Issue All Pipes 100% H
3.1 or 3.2)

Legends
MESC and International Stdandards - Latest Editions only Notes:
1. MESC SPE 74/002: Carbon Steel Pipes 1) Product marking shall be with Stencil marking and also include the charge number (heat number) and, where applicable,
(Amendments/Supplement to ASTM A 106) the heat treatment batch number.
2. NACE MR-0175: Petroleum and natural gas industries - 2) The standards where edition/version is not specified such standards shall be the latest.
Materials for use in H2S-containing environments in oil & 3) The NDT operators qualifications as per SNT TC 1A-2011.
gas production 4) Old / defective / pitted/ corroded materials shall not be used.
3. ASME Sec V: Nondestructive Examination
5) When acceptance criteria conflicts within the applicable specs, the stringent shall apply.
4. ASME B 31.3: Process Piping 6) Vendor shall have MESC access.
5. 7) Materials for sour service shall be supported by NACE MR-0175/ISO 15156 and compliance to the relevant MESC
ASME 36.10: Welded and Seamless Wrought Steel Pipe 8) This ITR is based on year 2016 MESC. User shall ensure the applicable versions of MESC and Intls Standards are as per PO
(Dimensions) 9) Lighting levels shall be 1000 lux for Visual Inspection. No surface breaking discontinuities are permitted
6. ASME B 16.25: Buttwelding Ends 10) Removal / tampering of original manufacturer marking on the bought out materials/ forgings is prohibited).
11) NDT procedures shall be approved by PDO.
12) No substitution of materials is permitted.
13) No weld repairs are permitted on base materials without PDO consent.
14) Supplier shall formally notify Contractor / PDO/TPI of inspection/test activity and shall not proceed unless Contractor /
PDO/TPI in attendance, or agreed in writing.
15) Final inspection by TPI not substitute for materials requiring 3.2 certification.
16) These requirements are based on PDO specifications for standard items. Based on project needs further requirements
shall be identified.
17) For SOUR service - Pipes shall be Normalized or Hot Finished. as per MESC specified HT Temperatures
18) As an alternative to the hydrostatic test at the option of the manufacturer or where specified in the purchase order as an
alternative or addition to the hydrostatic test, the full body of each pipe shall be tested with a nondestructive electric test.
19) These ITRs provide the minimum/ basic interventions by PDO/ TPI. Project / Asset QA / Consultants / Contractors may
enhance these interventions based on confidence on the vendor and project need.

Page 2 of 2

You might also like