RESEARCH PROJECT

On
BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT: A
COGNITIVE THEORY PERSPECTIVE

Submitted to

MAHARASHTRA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY,

AURANGABAD

Submitted by

SANA MARIYAM

B.A.LL.B. (Hons.) Semester- III

Roll no. 2022/BALLB/82

THEORETICAL SOCIOLOGY

Under the guidance of

Mr. Rahul Kosambi

1
 Assistant Professor of Sociology

Maharashtra National Law University,

Aurangabad

DECLARATION

This declaration is made at Aurangabad that this project is prepared and drafted by me, Sana
Mariyam.

It contains the project work that was assigned to me during my 3rd Semester period, and

successfully accomplished from my side.

This project is a sincere attempt at compilation of the aforementioned work.

This has not been submitted, either in whole or in part, to any other Law University or

affiliated Institute under which any University is recognized by the Bar Council of India, for

the award of any other law degree or diploma, within the territory of India.

SANA MARIYAM

2022/BALLB/82

2
INDEX

SR. NO. TITLE PAGE

NO.
1 INTRODUCTION 5

2 COGNITIVE FRAMING OF RACIAL INJUSTICE 6

3 SOCIAL IDENTITY AND COGNITIVE 8

MOBILIZATION

4 SOCIAL IDENTITY AND COGNITIVE 10

MOBILIZATION

5 COGNITIVE DISSONANCE: CATALYST FOR 12

ACTION

6 CONFIRMATION BIAS AND INFORMATION 15

DYNAMICS

7 PERSUASION STRATEGIES IN BLACK LIVES 18

MATTERS

8 COGNITIVE SHIFTS AND ACTIVISM 21

9 CHALLENGES, CONTROVERSIES, AND 24

CRITIQUES

10 ASSESSING IMPACT AND SOCIETAL CHANGE 30

11 CONCLUSION 31

12 REFRENCES 32

3
ABSTRACT

This analysis uses cognitive theory to examine the complex cognitive processes that have
shaped the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement. The Black Lives Matter movement's ardent
fight for racial justice and institutional change has been felt worldwide. The cognitive roots of
this movement can illuminate social activity mechanisms. This study examines the cognitive
elements that motivate Black Lives Matter (BLM) activists. It covers cognitive framing,
social identity, cognitive dissonance, confirmation bias, persuasive methods, cognitive
empowerment through education, and cognitive alterations' wider effects. Dissecting these
components illuminates the complex cognitive mechanisms behind BLM engagement. This
analysis also critically evaluates the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement's cognitive
strategy's challenges, conflicts, and criticisms. This study shows how difficult cognitive
adjustments are for social reform. We can better comprehend the Black Lives Matter (BLM)
movement's impact on society by underlining the role of cognitive processes in organising
collective action and encouraging fairness and impartiality.

4
INTRODUCTION

This 21st-century social and civil rights movement, Black Lives Matter (BLM), has
captivated the world with its passionate cry to abolish racial injustice and structural
inequality. The BLM movement's goals are anchored in socio-political reform, but Cognitive
Theory provides a unique viewpoint on its growth, mobilisation, and influence.

Cognitive Theory, a popular theoretical framework in sociology, psychology, and

communication studies, examines how perception, memory, reasoning, and emotion shape
human behaviour and social phenomena. We can study how people receive information, form
opinions, and behave collectively from this perspective. Cognitive theory illuminates the
BLM movement's mechanisms of action, social transformation, and challenge to established
norms. The cognitive lens is used to examine the BLM movement's evolution and influence.
It examines the BLM movement's cognitive framing strategies, collective identity and social
identity theory, cognitive dissonance, confirmation bias in information consumption,
persuasive techniques, empowerment through education, and cognitive transformation that
fuels activism. It will also critically explore the BLM movement's cognitive approach's
obstacles, controversies, and critiques and its societal influence. This approach helps us
understand how cognitive processes have influenced and continue to shape one of the most
important civil rights movements of our time by navigating cognitive theory and social
activism. It highlights the powerful impact cognitive change may have on individual and
communal actions, with implications for social justice and equality beyond this movement.

5
COGNITIVE FRAMING OF RACIAL INJUSTICE

The cognitive framing of racial injustice is a crucial aspect of understanding how individuals
and social movements perceive and address systemic racism and discrimination. Cognitive
framing refers to the way information and issues are presented, emphasizing specific aspects
while downplaying others, in order to shape public perception and mobilize action. In the
context of racial injustice, cognitive framing plays a pivotal role in framing the problem,
defining its causes and consequences, and motivating individuals and communities to address
it. Here are some key components of the cognitive framing of racial injustice:

1. Language and Slogans: One of the primary ways cognitive framing operates is through
language and slogans. Movements like Black Lives Matter (BLM) have effectively employed
phrases like "Black Lives Matter" to focus attention on the issue of racial injustice and police
brutality. This slogan, by explicitly stating that Black lives matter, frames the problem as a
matter of life and death and demands recognition and action.

2. Defining the Problem: Cognitive framing defines the problem of racial injustice in specific
terms. It highlights disparities in areas such as education, criminal justice, housing, and
employment. Framing emphasizes the structural and systemic nature of these disparities,
shifting the focus from individual prejudice to institutionalized discrimination.

3. Highlighting Inequities: Cognitive framing brings attention to racial inequities and

disparities in society. This involves presenting data and statistics that reveal racial disparities
in areas such as income, incarceration rates, and access to healthcare. These facts serve to
reinforce the framing of racial injustice as a pervasive and urgent issue.

4. Creating Empathy: Effective cognitive framing also appeals to emotions and empathy.
Personal narratives and stories of individuals who have experienced racial discrimination are
used to humanize the issue, making it relatable to a wider audience. These narratives often
challenge pre-existing beliefs and attitudes, fostering a sense of empathy and understanding.

5. Mobilizing Action: Cognitive framing is not merely about raising awareness; it also aims
to mobilize action. By framing racial injustice as an urgent problem with dire consequences,
it motivates individuals to participate in protests, advocacy efforts, and policy changes.

6
6. Countering Counter-Frames: In the realm of cognitive framing, there are often counter-
frames at play. These are alternative ways of interpreting the issue that challenge the
dominant frame. Movements like BLM must strategically address and counter these counter-
frames to maintain their cognitive framing's effectiveness.

In summary, the cognitive framing of racial injustice is a powerful tool used by social
movements and activists to shape public perception, generate empathy, and mobilize
collective action. It plays a critical role in defining the problem, emphasizing systemic
factors, and driving the demand for social change and racial equity. Understanding this
framing is essential for comprehending the dynamics of movements like Black Lives Matter
and their impact on addressing racial injustice.

7
SOCIAL IDENTITY AND COGNITIVE MOBILIZATION

Social identity and cognitive mobilization are integral aspects of understanding how
individuals and groups become engaged in social movements and activism, particularly in the
context of issues like racial injustice addressed by movements such as Black Lives Matter
(BLM). Social identity theory, developed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner, helps explain how
individuals derive a sense of identity and belonging from group memberships and how this
influences their cognitive processes and actions within the context of collective movements.
Here's an exploration of social identity and cognitive mobilization:

1. Social Identity Theory: Social identity theory posits that individuals categorize themselves
and others into various social groups based on shared characteristics such as race, ethnicity,
nationality, religion, or other affiliations. These group memberships contribute to a person's
social identity, which can have a profound impact on their self-concept and behaviour.

2. Collective Identity: Within the context of social movements like BLM, individuals often
form a collective identity associated with the movement. This collective identity can
transcend individual identities and become a powerful source of motivation for collective
action. For example, individuals who identify strongly with the goals and values of BLM may
adopt a collective identity cantered on racial justice and equality.

3. Group Cognition: Social identity theory suggests that group membership influences
cognitive processes. When individuals identify with a particular social group or movement,
their thinking becomes influenced by the norms, values, and goals associated with that group.
In the case of BLM, individuals may adopt a group-based perspective on issues of racial
injustice, which shapes their cognitive framing of the problem and potential solutions.

4. In-Group Favouritism: Social identity theory also describes the phenomenon of in-group
favouritism, where individuals tend to favour and support their own social group over out-
groups. Within the context of BLM, those who strongly identify with the movement may
exhibit in-group favouritism by advocating for policies and actions that benefit marginalized
communities and challenge systemic racism.

8
5. Mobilization and Activism: The cognitive processes influenced by social identity can be
harnessed for mobilization and activism. Individuals who strongly identify with a social
movement like BLM are more likely to engage in collective actions, such as attending
protests, signing petitions, and advocating for policy changes that align with the movement's
goals.

6. Solidarity and Unity: Social identity theory emphasizes the role of social identity in
creating a sense of solidarity and unity among group members. This sense of belonging and
shared purpose can strengthen the commitment of individuals to the movement's cause and
foster a sense of community.

In summary, social identity and cognitive mobilization are interconnected in the context of
social movements like BLM. Social identity theory helps us understand how individuals
derive their sense of identity from group memberships, and this identity, in turn, influences
their cognitive processes and motivations for participating in collective action. By examining
the dynamics of social identity and cognitive mobilization, we gain insights into how
movements like BLM mobilize individuals to advocate for social change and challenge racial
injustice.

9
SOCIAL IDENTITY AND COGNITIVE MOBILIZATION

Social identity and cognitive mobilization are critical components of understanding how
individuals and groups become actively involved in social movements and activism.
Grounded in social psychology and sociology, the concept of social identity explores how
people categorize themselves and others into various social groups and how these group
affiliations influence their beliefs, behaviours, and actions. When applied to social
movements like Black Lives Matter (BLM), social identity theory helps elucidate the
cognitive processes that drive collective mobilization. Here's a comprehensive exploration:

1. Social Identity Theory:

Introduction to Social Identity Theory: Brief overview of social identity theory as developed
by Henri Tajfel and John Turner.

Group Categorization: How individuals categorize themselves into social groups based on
shared characteristics such as race, ethnicity, gender, or affiliation with a social movement
like BLM.

2. Formation of Collective Identity:

Collective Identity and BLM: Examination of how individuals who identify with BLM form
a collective identity cantered on issues of racial injustice and equality.

Shared Values and Goals: Exploration of the values and goals that shape the collective
identity within the BLM movement, emphasizing the pursuit of social justice and an end to
systemic racism.

3. Influence on Cognitive Processes:

10
Group Cognition: Explanation of how group membership influences cognitive processes,
leading to the adoption of group-based perspectives on social issues.

Cognitive Framing: Analysis of how collective identity affects the way individuals within the
BLM movement frame the problem of racial injustice, focusing on systemic factors and
structural inequalities.

4. In-Group Favouritism and Out-Group Perceptions:

In-Group Favouritism: Discussion of the phenomenon where individuals favour and support
their own social group, leading to advocacy for policies that benefit marginalized
communities.

Out-Group Perceptions: Examination of how individuals in the BLM movement perceive out-
groups, particularly those who resist or oppose the movement's goals.

5. Mobilization and Activism:

Motivation for Collective Action: Exploration of how a strong collective identity within the
BLM movement motivates individuals to engage in collective actions, including protests,
advocacy, and community organizing.

Unity and Solidarity: Discussion of how collective identity fosters a sense of unity and
solidarity among BLM activists, strengthening their commitment to the movement's cause.

6. Challenges and Dynamics:

Identity Conflicts: Analysis of potential conflicts or divisions within the BLM movement
related to different aspects of social identity, such as race, gender, or class.

Intersectionality: Examination of how intersectionality—considering multiple dimensions of

social identity—shapes the BLM movement's diversity and strategies.

7. Impact and Future Directions:

Social Change: Discussion of the impact of social identity and cognitive mobilization in the
BLM movement on broader societal change and policy reform.

11
Future Prospects: Consideration of the role of social identity in the future of social
movements addressing racial injustice and equality.

This comprehensive exploration of social identity and cognitive mobilization within the
context of the BLM movement offers insights into how collective identities shape beliefs and
actions, motivating individuals to advocate for social change and confront issues of racial
injustice and inequality.

COGNITIVE DISSONANCE: CATALYST FOR ACTION

Cognitive dissonance theory, developed by Leon Festinger in the mid-20th century, provides
a valuable lens through which to understand the role of psychological discomfort in
motivating individuals to take action, especially in the context of social movements like
Black Lives Matter (BLM). Cognitive dissonance theory posits that when individuals hold
conflicting beliefs, attitudes, or values, they experience a state of discomfort or dissonance.
To alleviate this discomfort, they are motivated to change either their beliefs or their actions.
In the context of social activism, cognitive dissonance can serve as a catalyst for action in the
following ways:

1. Identifying Discrepancies:

Cognitive Dissonance as a Psychological State: Explanation of the psychological discomfort

individuals experience when their beliefs or values conflict with their actions or external
circumstances.

Recognition of Racial Injustice: How exposure to information and experiences related to

racial injustice can trigger cognitive dissonance in individuals who hold egalitarian beliefs
but witness racial disparities and discrimination.

2. Motivation for Change:

Dissonance Resolution: Discussion of the motivation to alleviate cognitive dissonance by

changing one's beliefs or taking action.

12
Activism as a Response: How individuals, experiencing dissonance between their belief in
equality and the reality of racial injustice, are motivated to participate in social activism, such
as joining BLM protests or advocating for policy reform.

3. Challenging the Status Quo:

Dissonance as a Catalyst for Questioning: How cognitive dissonance prompts individuals to

question existing norms, practices, and systems that perpetuate racial inequality.

Advocacy for Change: Examples of how cognitive dissonance drives individuals to challenge
the status quo by advocating for racial justice and equity.

4. Collective Action and Social Change:

Amplifying Impact: Discussion of how cognitive dissonance can have a collective impact
when shared by individuals within a social movement.

Mobilization and Solidarity: The role of cognitive dissonance in fostering a sense of urgency
and solidarity among BLM activists, driving collective action.

5. Overcoming Inertia and Apathy:

Resistance to Change: Exploration of cognitive dissonance as a mechanism for overcoming

resistance to change or complacency.

Motivating Engagement: How the discomfort of cognitive dissonance can be a powerful

motivator for individuals to become actively involved in addressing racial injustice within the
BLM movement.

6. Limitations and Challenges:

Recognizing Barriers: Acknowledgment of the limitations and challenges associated with

relying solely on cognitive dissonance as a catalyst for action.

13
Intersectionality and Complexity: Consideration of how factors such as intersectionality and
systemic barriers can complicate the relationship between cognitive dissonance and activism.

7. Future Directions and Implications:

Harnessing Cognitive Dissonance: The potential for social movements like BLM to
strategically leverage cognitive dissonance to drive societal change.

Psychological Dimensions of Activism: The continued exploration of cognitive dissonance as

a psychological catalyst for collective action in the pursuit of racial justice.

This analysis of cognitive dissonance as a catalyst for action within the context of the BLM
movement sheds light on how individuals grapple with conflicting beliefs about racial
equality and take steps to address racial injustice, ultimately contributing to broader social
change efforts.

14
CONFIRMATION BIAS AND INFORMATION DYNAMICS

Confirmation bias is a cognitive bias where individuals tend to seek out, interpret, and
remember information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs or values, while ignoring or
dismissing information that contradicts them. In the context of social movements like Black
Lives Matter (BLM), understanding confirmation bias and information dynamics is crucial
for comprehending how individuals engage with information related to racial injustice and
how this bias can influence their attitudes and behaviours. Here's an exploration of these
concepts:

1. Confirmation Bias:

Definition and Mechanisms: Explanation of what confirmation bias is and how it operates in
the cognitive processes of individuals.

Psychological Comfort: How confirmation bias can provide psychological comfort by

reinforcing existing beliefs and reducing cognitive dissonance.

2. Information Seeking and Consumption:

15
Selective Exposure: Discussion of how individuals actively seek out information that aligns
with their preconceived notions of racial injustice and discrimination.

Echo Chambers: Exploration of the role of online communities and social media in
amplifying confirmation bias by exposing individuals to like-minded perspectives.

3. Reinforcing Prejudices:

Reinforcing Stereotypes: Examination of how confirmation bias can perpetuate racial

stereotypes and prejudices by favouring information that confirms these biases.

Polarization: How confirmation bias contributes to the polarization of opinions and attitudes
regarding racial injustice, making it difficult to bridge ideological gaps.

4. Motivated Reasoning:

Motivated Reasoning Process: Discussion of how individuals engage in motivated reasoning,

actively interpreting information in a way that aligns with their pre-existing beliefs.

Resistance to Contradictory Information: How confirmation bias can lead individuals to

resist and dismiss information that challenges their existing views on racial issues.

5. Information Ecosystems:

Media Consumption Habits: Examination of how confirmation bias influences the media
outlets individuals choose to consume, reinforcing their existing perspectives.

Filter Bubbles: Exploration of how algorithms and personalized content on social media
platforms can create filter bubbles, where individuals are exposed to information that
reinforces their biases.

16
6. Impact on Social Movements:

Mobilization and Advocacy: How confirmation bias can contribute to the mobilization of
individuals who seek information that validates their support for movements like BLM.

Resilience to Counterarguments: The challenges faced by activists in trying to persuade those

with confirmation bias, as they may resist counterarguments and evidence.

7. Mitigating Confirmation Bias:

Media Literacy and Critical Thinking: Strategies for promoting media literacy and critical
thinking skills to help individuals recognize and counter confirmation bias.

Diverse Information Sources: Encouraging the consumption of information from diverse

sources to challenge pre-existing beliefs.

8. Ethical Considerations:

Ethical Journalism: The role of journalism and media outlets in presenting balanced and
unbiased information to combat confirmation bias.

Ethical Activism: The ethical responsibilities of social movements like BLM in presenting
information transparently and accurately.

9. Future Implications:

The Role of Technology: Exploration of how emerging technologies and artificial intelligence
may exacerbate or mitigate confirmation bias.

Psychological Factors in Activism: Continued research into the interplay between cognitive
biases like confirmation bias and activism in movements for racial justice.

17
Understanding confirmation bias and information dynamics in the context of the BLM
movement provides insights into how individuals engage with information, form their beliefs,
and participate in advocacy efforts related to racial injustice. It also highlights the need for
media literacy and critical thinking skills to promote a more informed and balanced discourse
on these crucial issues.

PERSUASION STRATEGIES IN BLACK LIVES MATTERS

The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement employs various persuasion strategies to mobilize
supporters, raise awareness, and advocate for racial justice and equality. Persuasion is a key
component of social activism, and BLM effectively utilizes persuasive techniques to convey
its message and inspire action. Here's an exploration of some of the persuasion strategies
employed by BLM:

1. Emotional Appeals:

Harnessing Empathy: BLM often uses emotional storytelling and personal narratives to evoke
empathy and connect with individuals on a deeply emotional level. These narratives highlight
the lived experiences of those affected by racial injustice, humanizing the issue and
motivating people to take action.

18
2. Visual and Symbolic Messaging:

Iconic Symbols: BLM has created powerful symbols such as the raised fist and "I Can't
Breathe" slogan, which serve as visual representations of the movement's message. These
symbols are highly effective in conveying the urgency and significance of the cause.

3. Moral and Ethical Appeals:

Appeals to Justice: BLM frames racial injustice as a moral and ethical issue, emphasizing the
importance of justice and equality. This moral high ground appeals to individuals' sense of
right and wrong, encouraging them to support the movement.

4. Cognitive Appeals:

Facts and Statistics: BLM provides data and statistics that highlight racial disparities and
systemic inequalities, appealing to individuals' rational and analytical thinking. These appeals
serve to substantiate the movement's claims and arguments.

5. Coalition Building:

Building Alliances: BLM actively collaborates with other social justice movements and
organizations to broaden its reach and influence. This strategy leverages the persuasive power
of collective voices and shared goals.

6. Grassroots Mobilization:

Grassroots Activism: BLM empowers individuals and communities to take grassroots action,
such as organizing protests, petitions, and community initiatives. This strategy mobilizes
people at the local level, fostering a sense of agency and efficacy.

7. Social Media and Digital Activism:

19
Utilizing Digital Platforms: BLM leverages social media and online platforms to disseminate
information, engage supporters, and organize events. It capitalizes on the power of viral
content and digital activism to spread its message globally.

8. Celebrity Endorsements:

Celebrity Allies: BLM benefits from endorsements and support from influential figures in
entertainment, sports, and politics. Celebrity endorsements can amplify the movement's reach
and influence, attracting wider attention and support.

9. Grassroots Storytelling:

Grassroots Narratives: BLM encourages grassroots storytelling, where individuals share their
personal experiences and perspectives on racial injustice. These authentic narratives create a
sense of community and solidarity among supporters.

10. Advocacy for Policy Change:

Policy Solutions: BLM advocates for specific policy changes and reforms to address racial
inequality and police brutality. This strategic approach appeals to individuals who seek
concrete solutions to the issues raised by the movement.

11. Peaceful Protest:

Nonviolent Demonstrations: BLM emphasizes nonviolent protest and civil disobedience as a

persuasive strategy, appealing to individuals who support peaceful means of social change.

These persuasion strategies collectively form a multifaceted approach used by BLM to

engage individuals emotionally, intellectually, and morally. By employing a variety of
appeals and tactics, BLM effectively communicates its message and fosters support for its
mission of achieving racial justice and equality.

20
COGNITIVE SHIFTS AND ACTIVISM

Cognitive Shifts and Activism in the BLM Movement, cognitive shifts play a pivotal role in
motivating individuals to engage in activism within the Black Lives Matter (BLM)
movement. These shifts involve changes in individuals' beliefs, attitudes, and perspectives,
often driven by increased awareness and understanding of racial injustice. Here's an
exploration of how cognitive shifts are connected to activism in the BLM movement:

1. Awareness of Racial Injustice:

21
Initial Recognition: Many individuals experience a cognitive shift when they become aware
of the extent of racial injustice, particularly through exposure to incidents of police brutality
and systemic discrimination. This awareness often serves as a catalyst for activism.

2. Shift in Perspective:

Changing Worldview: Cognitive shifts often entail a transformation in individuals'

worldviews. They begin to view issues of racial injustice from a different perspective,
recognizing the pervasive and systemic nature of these problems.

3. Moral and Ethical Awakening:

Values and Morality: Cognitive shifts in the BLM movement are frequently characterized by
a deepening of individuals' commitment to moral and ethical principles, such as justice,
equality, and human rights. These shifts motivate them to take a stand against racial injustice.

4. Empathy and Solidarity:

Building Empathy: Cognitive shifts often involve the development of greater empathy for
those directly affected by racial injustice. This emotional connection drives individuals to
engage in activism out of a sense of solidarity.

5. From Awareness to Action:

Bridging the Gap: Cognitive shifts bridge the gap between being aware of racial injustice and
taking concrete action to address it. Individuals who undergo these shifts are more likely to
participate in protests, advocacy, and community organizing.

6. Commitment to Change:

Long-Term Commitment: Cognitive shifts often lead to a sustained commitment to creating

lasting change. Activists who have undergone these shifts are less likely to be deterred by
challenges and setbacks.

7. Overcoming Apathy and Complacency:

22
Resistance to Inaction: Cognitive shifts challenge apathy and complacency, motivating
individuals to resist inaction and silence in the face of racial injustice.

8. Amplifying Voices:

Voice Amplification: Cognitive shifts empower individuals to use their voices and platforms
to amplify the voices of marginalized communities and advocate for systemic change.

9. Intersectionality:

Intersectional Understanding: Cognitive shifts may involve an appreciation for

intersectionality, recognizing that racial injustice intersects with other forms of discrimination
and oppression. This broader understanding informs more inclusive activism.

10. From Allyship to Advocacy:

Allyship Transformation: Cognitive shifts often transform allies into advocates. Individuals
who were initially allies become more actively involved in the movement and take on roles as
advocates for racial justice.

11. Grassroots Activism:

Local Action: Cognitive shifts can motivate individuals to engage in grassroots activism
within their own communities, addressing issues related to racial injustice at the local level.

12. Impact on Collective Action:

Strengthening Movements: When cognitive shifts occur collectively within a community or

society, they can significantly strengthen social movements like BLM, leading to larger
protests, policy changes, and societal shifts.

Cognitive shifts are integral to the process of engaging in activism within the BLM
movement. They reflect the transformation of individuals' beliefs and attitudes, which
motivates them to become agents of change, challenge racial injustice, and contribute to the
broader goals of the movement.

23
CHALLENGES, CONTROVERSIES, AND CRITIQUES

The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, while widely recognized for its efforts to address
racial injustice and promote equality, has faced various challenges, controversies, and
critiques. These issues reflect the complex nature of social movements and the diversity of

24
perspectives surrounding them. Here is an exploration of some of the challenges,
controversies, and critiques associated with the BLM movement:

1. Challenges in Messaging and Framing:

Messaging Clarity: Some critics argue that the BLM movement's messaging lacks clarity,
making it susceptible to misinterpretation or co-optation.

Framing Controversies: Debates arise regarding the movement's framing, with some
questioning the focus on defunding the police and calls for more systemic changes.

2. Tactics and Demonstrations:

Peaceful Protests vs. Civil Unrest: Controversies surround the distinction between peaceful
protests and instances of civil unrest that occur in the wake of certain BLM demonstrations.

Debate on Violence: Some critics condemn any form of violence or property damage
associated with BLM protests, while others argue that such actions are an expression of
frustration and should be understood in context

3. Diversity and Intersectionality:

Intersectionality Critiques: Some argue that the BLM movement needs to be more inclusive
and intersectional, acknowledging that the experiences of marginalized groups, including
LGBTQ+ individuals and disabled individuals, are often overlooked.

Leadership Representation: Critics point out that the movement's leadership needs to be more
representative of its diverse supporters.

4. Police Relations:
Controversy Over Police Relations: The movement's call for defunding the police or
reallocating funds has sparked debates about the role of law enforcement in society and
potential consequences.

25
5. Public Opinion and Polarization:
Varying Public Support: The BLM movement has varying levels of support among different
demographic groups, leading to polarization on the issue of racial injustice.

Counter-Movements: There have been counter-movements, such as "Blue Lives Matter" and
"All Lives Matter," that have emerged in response to BLM, further complicating the
dialogue.

6. Political Polarization:
Political Divide: The BLM movement's association with certain political ideologies has led to
political polarization, making it challenging to garner broad bipartisan support for its
initiatives.

7. Media Coverage and Bias:

Media Framing: Critiques centre on how the media portrays BLM protests and whether
coverage is balanced or sensationalized.

Bias Allegations: Accusations of media bias, whether for or against the movement, have been
a point of contention.

8. Goals and Policy Demands:

Clarity of Objectives: Some critics argue that the movement's objectives and policy demands
are not well-defined or actionable.

Effectiveness of Demands: Debates arise over the feasibility and effectiveness of specific
policy changes advocated by the movement.

9. Handling of Funds:
Accountability: Questions have been raised regarding the transparency and accountability of
organizations associated with the BLM movement in handling donations and funds.

26
10. Public Perception and Stereotyping:
Stereotyping of Activists: Some individuals hold stereotypes about BLM activists, leading to
misperceptions about their motivations and goals.

11. Controversies Over Leadership:

Leadership Disputes: The movement has faced internal disputes and controversies over
leadership and decision-making.

12. Co-optation and Commercialization:

Co-optation Concerns: Critics warn against the commercialization or co-optation of the
movement's slogans and symbols for profit or political gain.
It is essential to recognize that these challenges, controversies, and critiques are part of the
broader discourse surrounding the BLM movement. While they highlight areas of contention,
they also reflect the diversity of opinions and perspectives within society, underscoring the
complexity of addressing racial injustice on a large scale. The movement continues to evolve
and adapt in response to these challenges, striving to effect meaningful change and promote
racial equality.

27
ASSESSING IMPACT AND SOCIETAL CHANGE

The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, analysed through the lens of cognitive theory,
reveals a complex interplay of cognitive processes that have contributed to its impact on
society and the potential for societal change. Examining the movement from this perspective
allows us to understand the cognitive mechanisms behind its influence and the challenges it
faces in fostering lasting change. Here is an assessment of the impact and potential societal
change resulting from the BLM movement when viewed through a cognitive theory lens:

1. Cognitive Framing and Awareness:

• Impact: BLM's framing of racial injustice and police brutality has been instrumental
in raising awareness about these issues. The movement's cognitive framing,
emphasizing systemic problems and disparities, has resonated with a broad audience,
leading to increased recognition of the need for change.

• Societal Change: The cognitive shift in public awareness and perception has already
led to policy changes and increased scrutiny of law enforcement practices in many
areas. It has also spurred conversations about racial equity at the institutional and
systemic levels.

2. Social Identity and Empowerment:

• Impact: BLM has fostered a sense of social identity among its supporters, uniting
them under the banner of racial justice. This sense of identity has empowered
individuals to engage in activism and advocate for change.

• Societal Change: The empowerment stemming from social identity has resulted in a
surge of collective action and civic engagement. This has translated into increased
participation in protests, voting, and community organizing, with the potential to
influence policy decisions.

3. Cognitive Dissonance and Action:

• Impact: Cognitive dissonance theory helps explain why individuals motivated by the
belief in equality and justice may engage in activism when confronted with the

28
 cognitive dissonance of witnessing racial injustice. BLM's advocacy and protests have
intensified this cognitive dissonance, prompting action.

• Societal Change: The discomfort of cognitive dissonance has mobilized individuals

and communities to demand change, advocate for police reform, and work toward
dismantling systemic racism. This has resulted in tangible policy shifts in some
regions.

4. Confirmation Bias and Information Dynamics:

• Impact: BLM's use of social media and digital platforms has leveraged confirmation
bias by providing information that aligns with supporters' values and beliefs. This
amplifies the movement's message and fosters a sense of community.

• Societal Change: While confirmation bias can lead to polarization, it has also allowed
the movement to maintain a strong, cohesive base of supporters. However, it remains
a challenge in bridging ideological gaps and fostering constructive dialogue across
divides.

5. Cognitive Empowerment and Education:

• Impact: BLM's emphasis on education and awareness has empowered individuals to
understand the historical context and systemic nature of racial injustice. This
empowerment has translated into informed advocacy and activism.

• Societal Change: Cognitive empowerment through education has contributed to

ongoing dialogues about racism and prompted changes in educational curricula. It has
also led to increased participation in anti-racist initiatives and community-building
efforts.

6. Cognitive Shifts and Activism:

• Impact: The cognitive shifts experienced by individuals within the BLM movement
have been instrumental in motivating activism. These shifts reflect changes in beliefs,
attitudes, and perspectives.

29
 • Societal Change: Cognitive shifts have spurred individuals to engage in long-term
activism, challenge systemic inequalities, and advocate for policy reform. These shifts
represent a sustained commitment to addressing racial injustice.

7. Challenges, Controversies, and Critiques:

• Impact: While the movement has made significant strides, it faces challenges,
controversies, and critiques that reflect the diversity of perspectives within society.

• Societal Change: These challenges underscore the complexities of addressing racial

injustice and highlight the need for ongoing dialogue and collaboration to effect
lasting change.

In summary, the Black Lives Matter movement, when analysed through a cognitive theory
perspective, reveals a multifaceted impact on society. It has heightened awareness, fostered
empowerment, mobilized individuals, and prompted cognitive shifts that have the potential to
drive meaningful societal change. However, it also faces challenges and critiques that
underscore the ongoing nature of the struggle for racial justice.

30
CONCLUSION

Cognitive theory helps explain the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement's impact on society.
This perspective offers a fuller understanding of the complex interaction between cognitive
processes, social identity dynamics, and communication strategies that have shaped the
movement's influence. Cognitive framing, social identity, cognitive dissonance, confirmation
bias, cognitive empowerment, and cognitive shifts affect the movement and societal change.
Through its focus on structural injustices and inequality, the Black Lives Matter (BLM)
movement has raised awareness of racial injustice. This approach has catalysed legislative
changes and serious discussions about racial equity, transforming society. Social identity has
enabled activism, increasing civic engagement and transformative movements. Cognitive
dissonance between equality and racial injustice has led people and communities to actively
campaign for reform and challenge systematic racism. Social media confirmation bias has
helped the movement build a strong, cohesive support base. However, ideological conflicts
are difficult to reconcile using this strategy. Education-facilitated cognitive empowerment has
deepened understanding of racial injustice, encouraging informed advocacy and activism.

Cognitive transformations have motivated activists to fight systemic inequalities. These

changes in ideas, attitudes, and beliefs indicate a long-term commitment to fighting racial
injustice. However, the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement faces many issues, conflicts,
and criticisms that demonstrate the complexity of addressing systematic racial injustice in
society. Messaging clarity, tactical techniques and protests, diversity and intersectionality,
police relations, public opinion, political polarisation, media coverage, goals and policy
demands, funding, public perception, and leadership are controversial.

In conclusion, cognitive processes shape activism and social change, as seen by the BLM
movement. Racial inequalities can be addressed by collective efforts like the movement's
ability to raise consciousness, mobilise communities, and change minds. The movement for
racial equality and justice must master cognitive dynamics and address issues and disputes as
it evolves to make lasting progress.

31
REFRENCES

• https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
article=1839&context=honorsprojects

• https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/from-civil-rights-to-
black-lives-matter1/

• https://www.jstor.org/stable/27150915

• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305767/

• https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?
paperid=113444

• https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-022-01384-1

• https://academic.oup.com/book/39181

32