Title: Achieve Excellence in Your Literature Review with⇒ StudyHub.

vip ⇔

Welcome to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, your ultimate destination for exceptional literature review

assistance. As you embark on your academic journey, you'll encounter various challenges, one of
which is crafting a comprehensive literature review. Understanding the significance of this task, we're
here to guide you through the process and ensure your success.

The Difficulty of Writing a Literature Review

Writing a literature review can be a daunting task for many students and researchers. It requires not
only a deep understanding of the subject matter but also strong analytical and writing skills. Here are
some of the common challenges you may face:

1. Information Overload: With an abundance of scholarly articles, books, and other resources
available, it can be overwhelming to sift through the vast amount of information and identify
the most relevant sources.
2. Organizational Complexity:Structuring your literature review in a coherent and logical
manner poses a significant challenge. Ensuring that your review flows smoothly and
effectively communicates your ideas requires careful planning and organization.
3. Critical Analysis:Simply summarizing the findings of previous studies is not enough. A
literature review demands critical analysis and synthesis of existing research, identifying
gaps, contradictions, and areas for further investigation.
4. Time Constraints: Balancing the demands of academic coursework or research projects with
the task of writing a literature review can be difficult. Many students struggle to allocate
sufficient time and resources to this essential component of their academic work.

Four Major Goals of a Literature Review

1. Establishing Context: A literature review provides the context for your research by
summarizing and synthesizing existing knowledge on the topic. It helps readers understand
the significance of your study within the broader scholarly discourse.
2. Identifying Gaps: Through a critical analysis of existing literature, you can identify gaps or
areas where further research is needed. This sets the stage for your own contribution to the
field.
3. Evaluating Methodologies: Literature reviews allow you to evaluate the methodologies used
in previous studies, assessing their strengths and weaknesses. This helps you make informed
decisions about your own research approach.
4. Building a Theoretical Framework: By synthesizing existing theories and conceptual
frameworks, a literature review lays the groundwork for your own theoretical framework or
conceptual model.

Why Choose ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔?

At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we understand the challenges you face when writing a literature review.
That's why we're committed to providing you with expert assistance every step of the way. Here's
why you should choose us:

1. Expert Writers: Our team consists of experienced writers with advanced degrees in various
fields. They have the expertise and knowledge to deliver high-quality literature reviews
tailored to your specific requirements.
 2. Customized Approach: We understand that every project is unique. That's why we take a
personalized approach to each order, ensuring that your literature review meets your
individual needs and expectations.
3. On-Time Delivery: We understand the importance of deadlines. With ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔,
you can rest assured that your literature review will be delivered on time, allowing you ample
opportunity for review and revisions.
4. Affordable Pricing: We offer competitive pricing without compromising on quality. Our
transparent pricing policy means you'll know exactly what to expect, with no hidden fees or
extra charges.

Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review hold you back. Trust ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ to
provide you with the expert assistance you need to excel academically. Place your order today and
take the first step towards success!

Contact us now to get started

Rhetorical tautologies occur when additional words are used to convey a meaning that has already
been expressed or implied. Chapter 9 Methods for Literature Reviews Among other methods,
literature reviews are essential for: (a) identifying what has been written on a subject or topic; (b)
determining the extent to which a specific research area reveals any interpretable trends or patterns;
(c) aggregating empirical findings related to a narrow research question to support evidence-based
practice; (d) generat. If that’s not enough, you can copy-paste your paraphrased text into the
summarizer. With the increased knowledge of and experience in the topic as you proceed, your
understanding of the topic will increase. Sheehan B, Nigrovic LE, Dayan PS, Kuppermann N,
Ballard DW, Alessandrini E, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions,
measurement challenges, and research agenda. If you’ve gone over the word limit set for your
assignment, shorten your sentences and cut repetition and redundancy during the editing process. If
your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion take up more space and give
you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions separately from where you
discuss the literature itself. Human-centered design of clinical decision support for management of
hypertension with chronic kidney disease. The add-on AI detector is also powered by Turnitin
software and includes the Turnitin AI Writing Report. Any lit review is only as good as the research
it discusses; make sure your sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. Scientific
Method. Method of learning about the world through the application of critical thinking and tools
such as observation, experimentation, and statistical analysis Steps 1. Embed Host your publication
on your website or blog with just a few clicks. Factors of accepting pain management decision
support systems by nurse anesthetists. CDSSs in highly specialized specialties or those that
frequently treat multi-morbid patients, such as cardiology and geriatrics, require features that allow
for detailed workflow customization. However, non-English language articles or articles that did not
pass the MMAT assessment may have been overlooked, which would have provided valuable
information on further barriers and facilitators (i.e., threats to professional identity in different
cultures), affecting the rigor of this study. It provides a CONNECTION for your research from
previous studies as the BACKGROUND of your study. TH conceived the study, developed the
literature search, screened citation titles, abstracts, and full-text articles, conducted the MMAT
screening, cleaned, coded, analyzed, and interpreted one third of the data, and edited the sections of
the manuscript. Keep reading to enter the exciting world of literature reviews. KC: This knowledge
has prompted a push to incorporate teamwork training principles into health professions education
curricula. A literature review on the practice of targeted hypothermia in post-cardiac arrest comatose
patients Course development. Referencing and reference management Information Services provide
access to Cite them right online which is a guide to the main referencing systems and tells you how
to reference just about any source (EASE log-in may be required). To a novice researcher or graduate
student, this may seem counterintuitive. Proofreading involves looking at the text closely, line by
line, to spot any typos and issues with consistency and correct them. Refining Boolean queries to
identify relevant studies for systematic review updates. Your task is to write up how you actually
performed the experiment and evaluate the outcome. Available from. Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J,
Antes G. Furthermore, future research could explore the role of middle managers and team managers
in health care organizations rather than the role of senior management in managing professional
identity threats when leading change. Concept bubbles are usually nouns and connections are usually
verbs, adverbs, conjunctions etc.. concept. connections. Concept Maps: basic template. concept.
connection. connection. c oncept. concept. concept. concept. Citation (referencing) patterns What is a
literature review.
Learning From Secondary Research Evaluating Primary Research Additional information. 1: What is
a literature review. Rudestam, K.E. and Newton, R.R. (1992) Surviving your dissertation: A
comprehensive guide to content and process. The thematic analysis found three dimensions of
professional identity-related mechanisms that influence CDSS implementation success: perceived
threat or enhancement of professional control and autonomy, perceived threat or enhancement of
professional skills and expertise, and perceived loss or gain of control over patient relationships.
When unable to achieve desired temperature increase per hour with active rewarming techniques,
other measures may be used including raising the room temperature, convective heating devices,
heating lamps, or inspired air via ventilator heating circuit. I complained about ths because the great
contrast baffled me. The next step, the maintenance phase, involves sustaining the cooler body
temperature for at least 24 hours and often requires the utilization of sedation and analgesia.
Referencing previous related studies shows your work is grounded in established research and will
ultimately be a contribution to the field. Prescriber and staff perceptions of an electronic prescribing
system in primary care: A qualitative assessment. Acceptance and barriers pertaining to a general
practice decision support system for multiple clinical conditions: A mixed methods evaluation. PLoS
ONE. 2018;13:e0193187. Ash JS, Chase D, Baron S, Filios MS, Shiffman RN, Marovich S, et al.
The main reason is that most of the time the students end up writing a literature review that is just a
summary. It provides background and context, and shows how your research will contribute to the
field. Good Research Idea. Lect 20. Lect 16-18. Lect 18. Lect 1-6,12. My Typical Outline.
Introduction. In addition, the purpose of CDSS implementation and information about how it aligns
with organizational strategic goals and individual professional development should be clearly and
continuously communicated at all stages of implementation. Our framework presented in this study
provides a relevant foundation for further research on the complex relationship between human,
technological, and organizational implementation factors and professional identity among different
health care professionals. Many writers have learned that the literature review should describe what
is known. A total of 532 technological factors in 125 included studies were identified. Revising,
proofreading, and editing are different stages of the writing process. First, our included studies were
mainly conducted in the USA or UK (see Table S 2 ). In a well-studied field, like professionalism in
medical education, you must make a strong, explicit case for the existence of a gap. Terminology
Literature review format Literature review topics and subtopics Locating literature review sources
Choosing appropriate sources Your opinion Bibliography format. Adoption and use of stand-alone
electronic prescribing in a health plan-sponsored initiative. There are a number of stages in writing a
literature review. More studies are needed to provide a nuanced understanding of professional
identity mechanisms among health care professionals across a broader range of cultures and
countries. Then, an inter-coder reliability analysis was performed between the samples of coder 1 and
coder 2. Professor Dr. Ali K. Al- Juboori. Review of Literature: Major Goal. An exploration of
expectations and perceptions of practicing physicians on the implementation of computerized clinical
decision support systems using a Qsort approach. There are various types of reviews, including
narrative reviews, scoping reviews, and systematic reviews with reporting strategies such as meta-
analysis and meta-synthesis. Final search strings used to identify articles for the review. Table S2.
Characteristics of included studies. The most interesting literature reviews are often written as
arguments (again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t
work for all situations). Issuu turns PDFs and other files into interactive flipbooks and engaging
content for every channel.
Not convinced yet? Send in your free sample today and see for yourself. The current generation of
deployed capabilities are of at best marginal utility, despite concerted research efforts going back for
decades. What are some strategies or tips I can use while writing my lit review. Clinicians
satisfaction with CPOE ease of use and effect on clinicians’ workflow, efficiency and medication
safety. Literature Review: Managing Information Overflow: MindMapping, Citation Mappi.
Paramedics began cooling measures prior to hospital arrival by removing patient clothing and
applying cold packs as well. There are a number of stages in writing a literature review. Increased
incidence of adverse effects, however, have been consistently demonstrated with induced
hypothermia begging the question of whether the practice of TTM should continue, if less aggressive
temperature reductions closer to normothermia should be pursued, or if fever prevention itself is
more beneficial than the entirety of the TTM process. There are various types of reviews, including
narrative reviews, scoping reviews, and systematic reviews with reporting strategies such as meta-
analysis and meta-synthesis. QR Codes Generate QR Codes for your digital content. After the
introduction, it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical
framework or methodology. Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E.
Following is the most recent recording of the workshop, Conducting a Literature Review. Taxonomy
of delays in the implementation of hospital computerized physician order entry and clinical decision
support systems for prescribing: A longitudinal qualitative study. We categorized clinicians’
professional identity perceptions into three dimensions: (1) perceived threat and enhancement of
professional control and autonomy, (2) perceived threat and enhancement of professional skills and
expertise, and (3) perceived loss and gain of control over patient relationships. Table 2: Columbia
Anti-Shivering Protocol Cooling the body results in many physiologic changes that complicate the
TTM process. What follows first is a brief review of what can be gleaned in sex-specific responses to
fasting in animal studies. Scientific Method. Method of learning about the world through the
application of critical thinking and tools such as observation, experimentation, and statistical analysis
Steps 1. Workshop Overview. Explain elements of the systematic review process. You may or may
not need to separate your information into multiple paragraphs for each source. Inadequate IT skills
and lack of user training also contributed to limited understanding of the full functionality of CDSSs.
How to Download a PowerPoint Presentation PowerPoint is Microsoft’s presentation software.
Learning From Secondary Research Evaluating Primary Research Additional information. 1: What is
a literature review. In: Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. Several studies
indicated that the CDSS introduction elicited different individual attitudes and emotional responses.
Depending on your field of study, literature reviews can take different forms. Some disciplines
require that you synthesize your sources topically, organizing your paragraphs according to how your
different sources discuss similar topics. How To Write A Journal Article Review APA Style talisman-
intl.com literature review reviews advantages disadvantages research assessment based hkust journal
learning reference cei build write writers cooperate enjoy professional results. The goal is to evaluate
and compare previous research on a topic to provide an analysis of what is currently known, and also
to reveal controversies, weaknesses, and gaps in current work, thus pointing to directions for future
research. To develop a strong knowledge base to carry-out research and other educational and clinical
practice activities. Objectives. In 21 studies, technological factors were related to study participants’
perceptions of professional identity threat, while in 9 studies these factors were related to perceived
professional identity enhancements (Table 3 ).
Good academic practice As with any writing task, you will need to review, edit and rewrite sections
of your literature review. Formulating questions and locating primary studies for inclusion in
systematic reviews. Peripheral sites of temperature measurement should never be used due consistent
inaccuracy in hypothermic states. 1 In addition to reliable methods of measuring and adjusting core
body temperature, preventative methods must be taken to mitigate the risk for shivering at low
temperatures. More tenured health care professionals were “ frightened ” when confronted with a
new CDSS. Although we included 40 quantitative studies in our review, only a few of these
empirically measured the direct effect of professional identity threat or related organizational
consequences on implementation, adoption, or use of CDSSs. Factors that impact the adoption of
clinical decision support systems (Cdss) for antibiotic management. If, however, your literature
review is a standalone assignment, it is a good idea to include some sort of introduction and
conclusion to provide your reader with context regarding your topic, purpose, and any relevant
implications or further questions. If you need to remove a lot of words, you may have to cut certain
passages. Participatory design of probability-based decision support tools for in-hospital nurses. Use
digital shortcuts: Take note of any recurring mistakes (for example, misspelling a particular word,
switching between US and UK English, or inconsistently capitalizing a term), and use Find and
Replace to fix it throughout the document. Spring 2007 Helen Hough, BA, BS, M.L.S. Skilled
professionals. Citation (referencing) patterns What is a literature review. First, our included studies
were mainly conducted in the USA or UK (see Table S 2 ). The main reason is that most of the time
the students end up writing a literature review that is just a summary. Teams Enable groups of users
to work together to streamline your digital publishing. And since you’re considering and
acknowledging the contribution of key scholars alongside your own, it establishes your own
credibility and knowledge. Rather than a chronological listing of previous work, though, literature
reviews are usually organized thematically, such as different theoretical approaches, methodologies,
or specific issues or concepts involved in the topic. Most lit reviews use a basic introduction-body-
conclusion structure; if your lit review is part of a larger paper, the introduction and conclusion pieces
may be just a few sentences while you focus most of your attention on the body. What is the new
technical idea; why can we succeed now. Course Author Kelcy Sorensen, PharmD, BCPS Financial
Disclosure The developer of this course has no financial relationships to declare. If material is not
included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by
statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder. In this review, we summarize available evidence on the perspectives of these
communities; with a view to informing the improvement of cancer screening. Reading Background
reading Critical reading Writing Note taking Summarizing Synthesis. Implementation and use of
computerised clinical decision support (CCDS) in emergency pre-hospital care: A qualitative study of
paramedic views and experience using Strong Structuration Theory. The purpose of this study is to
uncover the role of professional identity in CDSS implementation and to identify core human,
technological, and organizational factors that may determine the effect of CDSSs on professional
identity. The review of the literature is defined as a broad, comprehensive, in-depth, systematic, and
critical review of scholarly publications, unpublished scholarly print materials, audiovisual materials,
and personal communications. Presentation Outline: What “Literature Review” is and its importance.
Proofreading is the final stage of checking a text before it is published or shared. A literature review
also includes a critical evaluation of the material; this is why it is called a literature review rather
than a literature report. CS planned and coordinated the study and edited the manuscript.
There is no set amount of words for a literature review, so the length depends on the research. Jeng
DJF, Tzeng GH. Social influence on the use of Clinical Decision Support Systems: Revisiting the
Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology by the fuzzy DEMATEL technique. While the
former factors represent important psychological safety and acceptance of the CDSS, the level of the
environment represents a minor role in the perception of professional identity. Frequently asked
questions: Academic writing A rhetorical tautology is the repetition of an idea of concept using
different words. Our framework presented in this study provides a relevant foundation for further
research on the complex relationship between human, technological, and organizational
implementation factors and professional identity among different health care professionals.
Electronic health record functions differ between best and worst hospitals. Literature reviews also
help you to gain an understanding of the theory(ies) driving the field, allowing you to place your
research question into context. Some senior physicians preferred the provision of evidence-based
guidelines that would reinforce their knowledge, while others advised junior physicians to override
the CDSS recommendations in favor of their own instructions. Taxonomy of delays in the
implementation of hospital computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems
for prescribing: A longitudinal qualitative study. Published in 2002, the Hypothermia After Cardiac
Arrest (HACA) study group conducted a multicenter, randomized control trial of patients who were
resuscitated following a witnessed cardiac arrest due to VF. Revising is making structural and logical
changes to your text—reformulating arguments and reordering information. In published medical
education research papers, the literature review is quite short, ranging from a few paragraphs to a
few pages, so you can’t summarize everything you’ve read. What are some strategies or tips I can
use while writing my lit review. Dr. Anne Davis Nov.17, 2005. Why research?. Intellectual curiosity
Research is fun and exciting. The purpose of this study is to uncover the role of professional identity
in CDSS implementation and to identify core human, technological, and organizational factors that
may determine the effect of CDSSs on professional identity. There are additional clusters in medical
specialty-related (33), health services, public health, or health care management-related (12), and
implementation science-related (2) journals. There are a number of stages in writing a literature
review. C507 Scientific Writing Session 6. The Review. The well-conceived review written after
careful and critical assessment of the literature is a valuable document. The Review. Susan Macicak:
Linguistics Imelda Vetter: Dell Medical School For help in other subject areas, please see the guide
to library specialists by subject. A user-centered evaluation of medication therapy management alerts
for community pharmacists: Recommendations to improve usability and usefulness. While early
studies found beneficial outcomes from this practice, more recent studies have not confirmed these
results and have demonstrated harms associated with induced hypothermia. What Is the Literature
Writing the Review A literature review is much more than an annotated bibliography or a list of
separate reviews of articles and books. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the
methodological quality of systematic reviews. Good Research Idea. Lect 20. Lect 16-18. Lect 18.
Lect 1-6,12. My Typical Outline. Introduction. This article explains how to use the literature review
section of your paper to build and characterize the Gap claim in your Problem-Gap-Hook.
Announcement: Today’s class location has been rescheduled to TEC 112 Next Week: Bring four
questions (15 copies) to share with your classmates. You are almost certainly contemplating doing
something unethical. The reviewed studies focused primarily on medication-oriented CDSSs. This
left us with a total of 4744 articles for the screening of the titles, abstracts, and full texts. Armed
with one of the world’s largest in-house editing teams - with over 1400 native English editors and
publication experts who cover 1200 subjects - we provide high-quality English paper editing services
to academic, publishing, and pharmaceutical communities.
Dr. Mark Matthews Student Learning Development Workshop Overview. There are two reasons for
this: The abstract should focus on your original research, not on the work of others. For example, if
you are reviewing literature about women and religion, key themes can include the role of women in
churches and the religious attitude towards women. Presents this info “at a glance.” Shows
relationships between concepts. The Editing and proofreading page includes tips on how to do this
and strategies for standing back and thinking about your structure and checking the flow of your
argument. You should indicate clearly in the table of contents where the literature review can be
found, and label this section as “Literature Review.” The main goal of a literature review is to
provide the researcher with sufficient knowledge about the topic in question so that they can
eventually make an intervention. What hinders the uptake of computerized decision support systems
in hospitals. The abstract should be self-contained and fully understandable without reference to
other sources. Make sure you use the style guide required by your professor for this assignment.
Transition to a new nursing information system embedded with clinical decision support: a mixed-
method study using the HOT-fit framework. Implement Sci. 2023;18:32. Kilsdonk E, Peute LW,
Jaspers MWM. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions. 104
IMAGES the goal of a literature review How To Write A Literature Review How to write a
literature review: Tips, Format and Significance literature review article examples Sample of research
literature review How to Write a Literature Review in 5 Simple Steps 50 Smart Literature Review
Templates (APA). Identifying Gaps: Aims to pinpoint areas where there is a lack of research or
unresolved questions, highlighting opportunities for further investigation. Keep reading to enter the
exciting world of literature reviews. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2018;6:e11468. Charani E, Kyratsis Y,
Lawson W, Wickens H, Brannigan ET, Moore LSP, et al. Your case studies are Data-Driven, and all
sources should come from scholarly articles Scholarly (peer-reviewed) articles vs. Forty-four factors
in 34 included studies were associated with perceived professional identity enhancements.
Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of
service organizations. Future research is needed, however, to determine whether all of these factors
play an important role in CDSS implementation. My weight has dropped from lbs to lbs and
literature. Hook: Given that much healthcare teamwork is distributed rather than co-located, our
curricula will be severely lacking until we create refined teamwork training principles that reflect
distributed as well as co-located work contexts. Therefore, the purpose of this narrative review is to
analyze the state of knowledge on the individual, technological, and organizational circumstances
that lead various health professionals to perceive CDSSs as a threat or enhancement of their
professional identity. Provide editors with a list of potential reviewers. Because external cooling
methods often cool the body too slowly and may excessively cool the patient, they carry a greater
risk for complications such as clotting disorders and dysrhythmias that are associated with lower
body temperatures in TTM. It does not have to be an exhaustive account of everything published on
the topic, but it should discuss all the significant academic literature and other relevant sources
important for that focus. Cite them right Published study guides There are a number of scholarship
skills books and guides available which can help with writing a literature review. During the French
invasion of Russia in early 1800s a battle field surgeon observed that wounded soldiers placed closer
to campfires died sooner than those who were kept in colder bunks. You will often see the terms “the
research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably. There are many
different routes to becoming a professional proofreader or editor. Unless otherwise noted, studies
indicated as qualitative studies in Table S 2 involved interviews and quantitative studies involved
surveys.