You are on page 1of 4

Embarking on the journey of writing a literature review can often feel like navigating through a

complex maze. This critical component of academic research demands not only a thorough
understanding of the relevant literature but also the ability to synthesize, analyze, and present it in a
structured and coherent manner. The process, inherently challenging, requires meticulous planning,
deep critical thinking, and exceptional organizational skills.

A literature review serves multiple purposes: it situates your research in the existing body of
knowledge, demonstrates a familiarity with major themes and findings, and identifies gaps or
inconsistencies in the literature. The ultimate goal is to provide a solid foundation for your research
question or hypothesis.

Structuring your literature review is paramount to its success. A well-structured review guides the
reader through the literature in a logical progression, making complex information accessible and
understandable. Typically, it begins with an introduction, outlining the purpose and scope of the
review, followed by the body, which is organized thematically, methodologically, or chronologically,
and concludes with a summary of the key findings and their implications for your research.

However, the path to crafting a comprehensive and well-organized literature review is fraught with
difficulties. Researchers often grapple with identifying relevant literature, discerning key themes and
patterns, and avoiding the pitfall of bias. Moreover, the sheer volume of literature can be
overwhelming, making it challenging to distill the most pertinent information. This task is further
complicated by the need to maintain a critical and objective stance, synthesizing a vast array of
sources while steering clear of plagiarism.

Given these complexities, it is not surprising that many researchers seek professional assistance. For
those looking to ensure the quality and integrity of their literature review, ordering from a trusted
service like ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ can be a wise decision. With a team of skilled writers who
specialize in academic research, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers tailored support to navigate the
intricacies of literature review writing. By opting for professional help, researchers can save valuable
time, avoid common pitfalls, and achieve a level of quality that might otherwise be out of reach.
Researching Society and Culture 3 rd February 2014 Hannah Jones. For more on this technique, look
at the tutorial on finding articles when you have a citation. Therefore, this review aims to identify
and compile a list of existing quality indicators that have been utilized to provide insight into WPV
within healthcare organizations and the impact of interventions to address WPV. To maintain track
of the scholarly articles and sources, use a bibliography or reference management software like
EndNote or Zotero. Do I know of primary and secondary sources that I can use as a way to find
other information. You may need to ask your examiner or professor the following questions. There
are different types of structural approaches to adhere to while organizing the main body part of the
literature review. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research. However, sometimes you
may need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the
organizational strategy of the body. In this post, I’ll show you exactly how to write a literature
review in three straightforward steps, so you can conquer this vital chapter (the smart way). How to
write a literature review in 30 minutes or less The goal of a literature review is to asses the state of
the field on a given topic in preparation for making an intervention. This helps to demonstrate that
you have identified the key research for your topic and is particuarly important for stand alone
literature reviews as this is your method. Its mind-mapping feature provides a structured framework
for brainstorming ideas, organizing thoughts, and visualizing relationships between concepts. Lastly,
you must ensure that your research paper does not lack any critical aspects and must not contain any
grammatical or spelling mistakes. The only proofreading tool specialized in correcting academic
writing The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts and by native
English editors. Provide strong sentences at beginnings of paragraphs: every paragraph shall deal
with a topic or make a point. You can dedicate a separate subsection of your literature review for
each of them. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred. Also, you
can give your interpretation of how and why specific advances occurred. Sometimes, students
hesitate whether to trust authors or not. A good strategy is to begin by searching the McMaster
Library Catalogue for resources about your chosen topic. Reading combined with critical analysis
can help to refine a topic and frame research questions. Including material just for the sake of it can
easily lead to reviews that are trying to do too many things at once. After doing a literature review,
you should know what research has already been done and be able to identify what is unknown
within your topic. Keep Your Own Voice: While the literature review presents others' ideas, your
voice (the writer's) should remain front and center. You can find other examples within most
scholarly research articles. Take notes and cite your sources As you read, you should also begin the
writing process. If you are working on your thesis, ensure to emphasize structuring your literature
reviews and be keen in presenting it in a clear, coherent, and organized manner. In the context of
WPV, they point to the historic mistreatment of certain identities and groups as stress-inducing
factors that contribute to disproportionate rates of violence. The literature review section appears to
be massive.
The 43 studies identified for data extraction produced 229 raw quality indicators. Publications
Account settings Advanced Search Journal List PLoS Comput Biol v.9(7); 2013 Jul Ten Simple
Rules for Writing a Literature Review Marco pautasso. 1 Centre for Functional and Evolutionary
Ecology (CEFE), CNRS, Montpellier, France 2 Centre for Biodiversity Synthesis and Analysis
(CESAB), FRB, Aix-en-Provence, France Literature reviews are in great demand in most scientific
fields. The literature review is one of the first and most crucial tasks in producing an academic paper.
The review should enumerate, describe, summarize, objectively evaluate and clarify this previous
research. Using referencing software from the very beginning of your endeavour will save you time.
Zissis D, Lekkas D (2014) Trust coercion in the name of usable public key infrastructure. Depending
on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. Having
an argument about the literature is vital; the absence of an argument means that you'll simply be
summarising. In some cases, prior research is simply described and summarized; in other cases, the
writer compares, contrasts, and may even critique prior research (for example, discusses their
strengths and weaknesses). At its core, a concept map consists of nodes, which represent individual
concepts or ideas, and. Project Supervisor: Dr. Maeve Duffy March 2009. VRM. Voltage Regulator
Module Switching Mode Power Supply for Microprocessor. How can I further my research as a
result of the review. If you are a working student or a student parent, you might not have enough
time to conduct your research. If you’re working on research derived from different disciplines and
methodologies, this approach would be more suitable to structure your literature review. In other
words, they provide helpful background and context. This means drawing connections between
sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a topic over time. Then, find appropriate
books in the library and check them out. This structure will both be informed and supported by all
the papers you select to be in the lit review. This means we'll keep fixing the work until the
supervisor approves it. Look how easy it is to organize your literature review. Do not use extensive
quotes as a substitute your own summary and interpretation of the literature. Limitations This rapid
review had several limitations. If you’d also rather trust an expert than write an overview yourself,
there’s good news. This can show you logical ways to put your literature review together, as well as
give you some ideas about how you can explain to your readers how the various parts fit together.
One way to structure your research question is to break it down into different parts. The notes should
include anything that will be helpful in advancing your own thinking about the topic and in helping
you write the literature review (such as key points, ideas, or even page numbers that index key
information). For instance, multiple studies reported indicators that measured the frequency of
specific violent events and interventions. Consider the following issues before writing the literature
review: Clarify If your assignment is not very specific about what form your literature review should
take, seek clarification from your professor by asking these questions: 1. Your literature search
strategy should prioritize new publications over older ones to cover the latest research advancements.
?? Literature Review Structure Example On-Time Delivery. Always make sure your quotation marks
are clear in your notes (it is easy to miss them in a hurry) and it really helps to record the page
number of any direct quotation so you can go back to check easily.
Literature Review Topics Looking for literature review topic ideas and picking the best one is not
the step you can skip. Are there any weaknesses that should be addressed. You need to be careful
about the literature review paragraph structure. Much of the information used in an annotated
bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit
review as you research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among
scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic. To put it bluntly, if you don’t
understand the function and purpose of the literature review process, there’s no way you can pull it
off well. What should I be aware of when looking at popular, trade, and scholarly resources. Reading
at university The Academic writing page suggests ways to organise and structure information from a
range of sources and how you can develop your argument as you read and write. Nonetheless,
healthcare organizations continue to develop interventions that attempt to mitigate the effects of
WPV on staff and patient safety, with varying efficacy that can be attributed to their attentiveness to
these gaps. The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.
Consider using transition phrases like the following, or borrow phrasing that you like from other
articles. (It's not plagiarism to use common phrases.). Give your interpretation of how and why
certain developments occurred. Utilizes Evidence: Enhances credibility by citing expert findings and
theories. To address this void, our study conducts a meticulous bibliometric analysis of the literature
on workplace deviance in the context of the hospitality industry, offering insights into its evolution
over time. When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the
research ( scholarship ) in a given field. Rule 6: Be Critical and Consistent Reviewing the literature is
not stamp collecting. For example, based on simple physics calculations, doubled carbon dioxide
concentration in the atmosphere can lead to a global temperature increase of approximately 1 degree
Celsius. (Elderfield, 2022). In order to determine the human influence on climate, scientists still have
to analyze a lot of natural changes that affect temperature, precipitation, and other components of
climate on timeframes ranging from days to decades and beyond. Major heading was applied to all
subject headings, and keywords were restricted to titles and assigned keywords. Hence, one can
conclude that being a victim of bullying increases one’s likelihood of becoming a cyberbully.
However, progression of time may still be an important factor in a thematic review. Receive your
plagiarism-free paper done in only 3 hours Learn more The majority of literature reviews follow a
standard introduction-body-conclusion structure. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. To inform your methodological
choices and help you source tried and tested questionnaires (for interviews ) and measurement
instruments (for surveys ). Analysis: Involves critically evaluating and summarizing key findings,
methodologies, and debates found in. The conclusion should: summarise the important aspects of the
existing body of literature; evaluate the current state of the literature reviewed; identify significant
flaws or gaps in existing knowledge; outline areas for future study; link your research to existing
knowledge. Literature reviews can also “stand alone” as separate articles by themselves. Standards:
the way in which you present your information. Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established
knowledge. You can examine your search terms and any limits you have applied when searching a
database by visiting its search history. For each publication, ask yourself: What question or problem
is the author addressing. Holding degrees in more than 50 subjects, they know how to create
masterpieces.

You might also like