Title: Mastering Your Literature Review: A Guide to Crafting a Systematic Search Strategy

Crafting a literature review is an integral part of academic research, providing a comprehensive

summary of existing literature relevant to a particular topic. However, the process of conducting a
systematic literature review can be daunting and time-consuming. A crucial aspect of this process is
developing an effective search strategy to ensure comprehensive coverage of relevant literature
while minimizing bias.

Formulating a systematic search strategy requires a strategic approach and a keen understanding of
the subject matter. It involves identifying key concepts, selecting appropriate databases, utilizing
relevant search terms, and employing search filters. The goal is to retrieve all relevant studies while
minimizing the retrieval of irrelevant or duplicate records.

One of the biggest challenges in developing a search strategy is the sheer volume of available
literature. Navigating through numerous databases and refining search terms to capture relevant
studies can be overwhelming. Moreover, ensuring the reproducibility and transparency of the search
process adds another layer of complexity.

To alleviate the burden of crafting a literature review, many researchers turn to professional writing
services. Among these, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ stands out as a trusted partner in academic writing. With
a team of experienced writers well-versed in systematic literature review methodologies, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers tailored assistance in developing comprehensive search strategies.

By leveraging their expertise, researchers can streamline the process of literature review and focus on
analyzing and synthesizing the retrieved literature. With ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔'s support, scholars can
ensure the rigor and reliability of their research findings, paving the way for impactful contributions
to their respective fields.

In conclusion, crafting a systematic literature review search strategy is a challenging yet essential
task in academic research. By partnering with ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, researchers can overcome these
challenges and embark on a journey towards producing high-quality literature reviews. Let us assist
you in navigating the complexities of literature review, ensuring your research stands out for its
thoroughness and rigor.
Finding a good review can save you hours of searching and will give you a ready-made search
strategy to update or modify. Stand-alone literature reviews are the most common type of literature
review and are frequently assigned by professors. Little design up front Separate product discovery
and product creation. In order to identify candidate principles, each code was investi-. References
go back to 1996. 80% of content is indexed with controlled vocabularies. 100% coverage of
Medline, including unique Medline journals. 28 million abstract records. 245 million references
added to all abstracts. The method exists in an unpublished and relative simple version presented
here. When you search for literature using quotation marks, the search becomes more precise; you
will only find articles where that exact phrase is used and miss articles that contain variations on that
phrase or a similar combination of search terms. In such a case, it might not make sense to attempt to
determine one overall meta effect size from a comparison of the studies. The synthesis of multiple
high-quality studies creates a single product out of all the best known evidence. The more search
blocks you have, the narrower your search will be; the narrower your search, the greater your risk of
excluding relevant articles. The structure will help you to clearly express your ideas and demonstrate
how your sources are connected. Radeva-Petrova et al. ( 2014 ) wrap up on page 120. There are two
main ways to search the database: --- select General Search to search for articles by subject term,
author name, journal title, or author affiliation --- select Cited Reference Search to search for articles
that cite an author or article that you specify. They are usually one of the first steps in research
methodologies. Before you start, you may want to brainstorm some common themes that you will
use to analyze the sources (e.g., participant characteristics, measurement tools, results). Use the
search strings created in Step 2 to search the databases. Consult your library subject guide to review
databases appropriate for your topic. For the first part see Slaying the (literature review) beast: Part 1.
Electronic forms are useful and can facilitate subsequent analysis. Writing an embedded literature
review will clarify your understanding of the material and demonstrate your thorough research skills.
Context: In the last decade, software development has been characterized by two major approaches:
agile. In this case, devote most of your space to explaining the connections between sources, but you
must also include a thesis and a conclusion, even though they will be brief. Web-based software (e.g.,
Google Docs or Google Sheets ) should be considered for collaborative projects. Please see our
systematic review guide if you are documenting a search strategy for a systematic review. Embase
Embase is a comprehensive biomedical literature database that provides over 30 million abstracts and
indices from published, peer-reviewed literature, in-press publications and conferences covering the
most important international biomedical literature from 1947 to the present day. When you test
search, you simultaneously discover what terminology is common in the field, and thus find more
search terms. Heterogeneity means diversity (and is the opposite of homogeneity). This process is
more ad hoc for literature reviews. On March 30, 2016, Andrew Duong taught a seminar to students
at the Michael DeGroote School of Medicine on the 6 Steps of the Systematic Review Process.
If so, you might consider proposing a collaboration or modifying your aims. Your second move
should be to consult a clinical librarian or someone with experience conducting a systematic review
for tips on setting up your project. The library was pro-active in adopting a new service model as it
took cognisance of the fact that there would be a greater emphasis on supporting academics and their
research; and ensuring that library staff were appropriately skilled to support these services into the
future (Kealy, 2009: 573). Third, identify patterns in approaches to your topic. For instance, you can
search for the articles using titles, but you can also do so using PMID-nr or DOI-nr. The process of
performing a systematic literature review must be transparent and. We don’t know if it prevents
maternal deaths, as this would require very large studies to detect an effect. For the first part see
Slaying the (literature review) beast: Part 1. Recently uploaded Grantseeking Solo- Securing Awards
with Limited Staff PDF.pdf Grantseeking Solo- Securing Awards with Limited Staff PDF.pdf
TechSoup HOW TO DEVELOP A RESEARCH PROPOSAL (FOR RESEARCH SCHOLARS)
HOW TO DEVELOP A RESEARCH PROPOSAL (FOR RESEARCH SCHOLARS) Rabiya
Husain Unleashing the Power of AI Tools for Enhancing Research, International FDP on. These
should ideally be articles that correspond to your research question as closely as possible. If you have
less time than that available, you may want to conduct a rapid review instead. Often you will need to
use a modified and simplified search strategy to search for grey material. In both stand-alone and
embedded historiographies, you must support your arguments and analyses with examples from the
sources. For example, kinesiologists studying heart disease will review the literature to identify
acceptable measurement methods, whereas anthropologists researching intersections of culture and
technology need to examine the literature to identify different categories of analysis. Screening for a
literature review is typically less intensive. It is meant to convince the reader of the importance of
your study. Address how your approach to the topic reinforces or rejects previous approaches as well
as how your work contributes to the larger body of knowledge on your topic. Scopus covers: Over
15,000 peer-reviewed titles from more than 4,000 international publishers, including coverage of: 500
Open Access journals, 700 Conference Proceedings, 600 Trade Publications, 125 Book Series. I’m
talking about systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Commonly used tools include desktop or web-
based word processors and spreadsheet software. Ovid is a database platform used for many
different databases. The overall (pooled) effect size is 0.39, or a 61% reduction in the risk of
parasitemia. News Production Workflows in Data- driven, Algorithmic Journalism: A Systema. This
is usually referred to as a free-text search. Cornell University Library has created a decision tree that
can help you determine what kind of review might best suit your goals and constraints. Every
Tuesday and Thursday at the Research Commons. News Production Workflows in Data- driven,
Algorithmic Journalism: A Systema. In EndNote, you can both organize your references and get rid
of duplicates. In addition to including all the questions needed to answer the review question and.
Changes in approach over time can be seen after publication information has been compared, so be
sure to place the authors within their own historical context too. SpiderCite builds on citation data
from Lens.org. To use SpiderCite you need to save the publications you want to use as your starting
point in an XML, RIS or BibText-file.
In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). Literature reviews don’t have to follow such rigid methods or
make the methods explicit. OR Agile, scrum, extreme programming, lean, crystal clear, feature
driven development, dynamic software development. With the tools to objectively collect and
interpret information, investigators can cater research programs, and expand on the current body of
knowledge. For this reason, most systematic reviews are conducted by teams, given the large scope
of the data initially collected for most research topics. There is fine line between them but generally
if you are an undergraduate you will be doing the latter. A meta-analysis combines data from
different studies, effectively creating a larger sample size to improve the quality of information.
These preregistration plans include a specific search strategy using specific search terms for
individual scholarly databases so other researchers can recreate the search. OR cross organisation OR
cross organization OR cross organizational OR. As a student you should rather do a structured
literature review, including only certain aspects of the methodology described on this page. Use the
Please Log In or Create an Account button to create a Cochrane account or connect an exising
accountto the University's subscription. In order to identify candidate principles, each code was
investi-. OR Agile, scrum, extreme programming, lean, crystal clear, feature driven development,
dynamic software development. Because of differences in how we extract data from sources and
what information is relevant, the analysis within and structure of our literature reviews will vary.
Communications of the Association of Information Systems, 37 (43), 879-910. UCASD. Overall, as
listed in Table 5, four codes from our coding sys-. The search terms within each block are combined
with OR, then the blocks are combined with AND. You will use these to create search blocks that
will then form the basis for the search strings used in the different databases. You may want to add
these new headings to your Matrix to remind you to critically appraise the sources according to this
new criteria. In this case, devote most of your space to explaining the connections between sources,
but you must also include a thesis and a conclusion, even though they will be brief. The more search
blocks you have, the narrower your search will be; the narrower your search, the greater your risk of
excluding relevant articles. Fig. 6. Codes and number of articles related to the continuous stakeholder
involvement principle. The review must be documented in sufficient detail for readers to be able to.
As such, the thesis or central argument of your historiography should explain why your research on
the topic contributes to or rejects previous historical analyses of your topic. Fig. 5. Codes and articles
related to the process dimension. Using Smartwatches to Assist Students with Intellectual and
Developmental Dis. Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Database The Joanna
Briggs Institute EBP Database allows you to search simultaneously, a wide range of summarized and
appraised evidence, to inform your practice. There are also international guidelines that detail how
systematic reviews should be reported, the Prisma Guidelines. We don’t know if it prevents maternal
deaths, as this would require very large studies to detect an effect. In addition, the research team
formally assesses the quality of each study, including the potential for bias, and these assessments are
considered when the results are synthesized.
In the picture below you can see how the different search strategies compare to one another. Louis
Region The Opportunity Trust Recently uploaded ( 20 ) Grantseeking Solo- Securing Awards with
Limited Staff PDF.pdf Grantseeking Solo- Securing Awards with Limited Staff PDF.pdf HOW TO
DEVELOP A RESEARCH PROPOSAL (FOR RESEARCH SCHOLARS) HOW TO DEVELOP A
RESEARCH PROPOSAL (FOR RESEARCH SCHOLARS) Unleashing the Power of AI Tools for
Enhancing Research, International FDP on. Codes related to the iterative and incremental design and
development principle. More speci?cally, we investigate the following research question. Figure 3.3:
Malaria chemoprevention for pregnant women living in endemic areas. It's important to know if the
SR you're doing has been done already to avoid duplication. For instance, you can search for the
articles using titles, but you can also do so using PMID-nr or DOI-nr. You must have a clear
understanding of the important people, series of events, places, or times that were involved with
your topic. You will also describe your search strategy, inclusion criteria, and overall methodology so
that your review is reputable and replicable. These look a little different depending on which
database you’re using. Very useful video (8.24mins) from McGill University on the different types of
review - narrative, systematic and scoping. It is just as important to identify gaps in knowledge, as
this will inform future areas of research. Every Tuesday and Thursday at the Research Commons.
Find additional examples of useful tools at Systematic Review Toolbox. PubMed - US National
Library of Medicine, NIH Provides access to citations for biomedical articles from Medline and life
science journals. An effect size is a measure of the strength or magnitude of a relationship, such as
the relationship between taking a medicine and experiencing a bad outcome. OR Agile, scrum,
extreme programming, lean, crystal clear, feature driven development, dynamic software
development. In order to identify candidate principles, each code was investi-. A small number of
high quality studies with a low risk of bias is preferable to lots of poorly reported or conducted
studies. Parallel tracks Parallel interwoven creation tracks. Keep in mind that finishing it could take
longer than a year. The stages listed above may appear to be sequential, but it is important to
recognize. SLRs may be quantitative (by only reviewing quantitative studies), qualitative (by only
reviewing qualitative studies), or mixed methods (by reviewing both quantitative and qualitative
studies). Radeva-Petrova et al. ( 2014 ) wrap up on page 120. Systematic Reviews currently
scheduled will proceed as arranged without interruption. Web sources are searched via Scirus, and
include author homepages, university sites and resources such as the preprint servers CogPrints and
ArXiv.org, and OAI compliant resources. This reduces the chance of bias and improves the reliability
of the results. The overall (pooled) effect size is 0.39, or a 61% reduction in the risk of parasitemia.
Start by focusing on the red box and examine the comparative risk column that shows the assumed
risk among the control group. But sometimes, it pays to let someone else do the work for you.
You will also describe your search strategy, inclusion criteria, and overall methodology so that your
review is reputable and replicable. But sometimes, it pays to let someone else do the work for you.
Use the Please Log In or Create an Account button to create a Cochrane account or connect an
exising accountto the University's subscription. Select fields for each comparison below and click on
Find Duplicates under References and remove all duplicates. They are usually one of the first steps
in research methodologies. Team members screen the search results and sort them according to these
criteria, beginning with titles and abstract reviews and moving to full-text reviews later. Research
groups and researchers contacted (Names and contact details). In this case, the result is considered
not “statistically significant.”. If you do so, however, you risk missing material that may have been
added retrospectively to the database. The stages listed above may appear to be sequential, but it is
important to recognize. You can use these key articles to both construct your own search strategy
and to test it: if your search does not retrieve your key articles, then your strategy needs to be
modified. There are several different options for searching in Embase (via embase.com). In the
search example below, we show how you can structure the search in a similar way as in Medline
Ovid. For example, scholars who published in the 1960s interpreted a historical event differently
than those who published in the early 2000s. Their objective is to synthesize evidence through meta-
analysis, a type of SLR that employs statistical analyses. McGill Library also has a helpful guide to
Rayyan. We can also suggest resources to help with the other steps. Every Tuesday and Thursday at
the Research Commons. Adding a number after N will determine how many words you want to
“allow” between your two terms. Parallel tracks Parallel interwoven creation tracks. For example,
kinesiologists studying heart disease will review the literature to identify acceptable measurement
methods, whereas anthropologists researching intersections of culture and technology need to
examine the literature to identify different categories of analysis. It helps plan and specify how you
will navigate the systematic review process and stay on course. News Production Workflows in
Data- driven, Algorithmic Journalism: A Systema. If chemoprevention has some preventive effect,
less parasitemia should be observed among women exposed to the medication (i.e., treatment). Few
interventions are 100% effective, so scientists often talk about reductions in the risk of bad outcomes
like malaria. For stand-alone historiographies, include an introduction, body paragraphs, and a
conclusion. The results of a meta-analysis are typically summarized in a forest plot like the one
shown in Figure 3.7. Let’s take a look at this helpful guide from Ried ( 2006 ) that breaks it all
down. The overall (pooled) effect size is 0.39, or a 61% reduction in the risk of parasitemia.
ClinicalTrials.gov Database of clinical trials sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, other
Federal agencies and the pharmaceutical industry. You must have a clear understanding of the
important people, series of events, places, or times that were involved with your topic. Web sources
are searched via Scirus, and include author homepages, university sites and resources such as the
preprint servers CogPrints and ArXiv.org, and OAI compliant resources.