Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sample Description : 8135-COMBO TRAVEL HARNESS FOR SAFE RIDES & WALKS;8029--
DOG WATER BOWL; 8003--ALWAYS COOL DOG MAT; 5820--BATH
ANTI ANXIETY DUCK
Style No. : 8029-8003-8135--5820
Item No. : 8029-8003-8135--5820
Buyer : AFP
Supplier : ALL FOR PAWS LIMITED
Manufacturer : ALL FOR PAWS LIMITED
Country of Origin : CHINA
The above sample(s) and information were provided by the client.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------
Hedy Hu
Approved Signatory
Test Report No.: NGBHL22002297601 Date: Jul 20, 2022 Page 2 of 9
Test Results:
Remarks:
(1) 1 mg/kg = 0.0001%
(2) MDL = Method Detection Limit
(3) ND = Not Detected (< MDL)
(4) “-“ = Not Regulated
Test Method: With reference to CPSC-CH-E1002-08.3, analysis was performed by AAS or ICP-OES.
Notes:
(1) The limit is referenced to the requirement as stated in County of Alameda Court Case No.
RG-10-514803 (Consolidated with Case No. RG 10-545680 and RG 10-545687).
(2) The reference limit applied in testing is based on particular California Proposition 65
settlements that are most similar to the tested product in the opinion of the lab. The testing in
this report does not reflect a user’s actual exposure to the tested chemical.
A manufacturer or retailer that is not named in the referenced settlement is not bound by that
Test Report No.: NGBHL22002297601 Date: Jul 20, 2022 Page 3 of 9
settlement, and may choose to comply with California Proposit ion 65 by clearly informing the
consumer of potential exposure.
Test Method: With reference to CPSC-CH-E1002-08.3, analysis was performed by AAS or ICP-OES.
Notes:
(1) The limit is referenced to the requirement specified in Settlement Agreement between San
Francisco Case No. CGC-09-489839 and County of Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC
449019.
(2) The reference limit applied in testing is based on particular California Proposition 65
settlements that are most similar to the tested product in the opinion of the lab. The testing in
this report does not reflect a user's actual exposure to the tested chemic al.
A manufacturer or retailer that is not named in the referenced settlement is not bound by that
settlement, and may choose to comply with California Proposition 65 by clearly informing the
consumer of potential exposure.
Test Method: With reference to CPSC-CH-E1002-08.3, analysis was performed by AAS or ICP-OES.
Notes:
(1) The limit is referenced to the requirement specified in Settlement Agreement between San
Francisco Case No CGC-08-476552 and CGC-11-508435.
(2) The reference limit applied in testing is based on particular California Proposition 65
settlements that are most similar to the tested product in the opinion of the lab. The testing in
this report does not reflect a user's actual exposure to the tested chemical.
A manufacturer or retailer that is not named in the referenced settlement is not bound by that
Test Report No.: NGBHL22002297601 Date: Jul 20, 2022 Page 4 of 9
settlement, and may choose to comply with California Proposition 65 by clearly informing the
consumer of potential exposure.
Test Method: With reference to US EPA 3550C: 2007, analysis was performed by HPLC-DAD-MS or
LC-MS-MS.
Notes:
(1) The limit is referenced to the requirement as stated in County of Alameda Case No
RG19010563.
(2) The reference limit applied in testing is based on particular California Proposition 65
settlements that are most similar to the tested product in the opinion of the lab. The testing in
this report does not reflect a user’s actual exposure to the tested chemical.
A manufacturer or retailer that is not named in the referenced settlement is not bound by that
settlement, and may choose to comply with California Proposition 65 by clearly informing the
consumer of potential exposure.
(3) #=Exceed the limit
Notes:
(1) The limit is referenced to the requirement as stated in County of San Francisco Case No.
CGC-14-541130 and CPSIA&16 CFR 1307.
(2) The reference limit applied in testing is based on particular California Proposition 65
settlements that are most similar to the tested product in the opinion of the lab. The testing in
this report does not reflect a user’s actual exposure to the tested chemical.
A manufacturer or retailer that is not named in the referenced settlement is not bound by that
settlement, and may choose to comply with California Proposition 65 by clearly informing the
consumer of potential exposure.
(3) #=Exceed the limit
Unless otherwise stated, the decision rule for conformity reporting is based on Binary Statement for Simple
Acceptance Rule (w=0) stated in ILAC-G8:09/2019.
Test Report No.: NGBHL22002297601 Date: Jul 20, 2022 Page 7 of 9
S ample P hoto:
NGB22-0022976
NGB22-0022976-0001. C002
Test Report No.: NGBHL22002297601 Date: Jul 20, 2022 Page 8 of 9
NGB22-0022976-0001. C003
NGB22-0022976-0001. C004
Test Report No.: NGBHL22002297601 Date: Jul 20, 2022 Page 9 of 9
NGB22-0022976-0001. C005
NGB22-0022976-0001. C006