IPe BNS

S 304A 1060)

Negligened
BNS hes 958 elioy

S. 302 I03
(Hsde)
S. 345) G3
9. 376

Rabe oluuisheut
S. 354

CsPe:

cdugalat
i+ is unmou eases
þut

ataut
Sunmons
 2()

Case>
-) K
quitline,

fuidebues

esifalay
it indalos the

inguity

om any foB

S.ISs/
9 )4
0 itJeemoto ato the eginmusidth any
lao to regiter
.4 magisbalo d'net theu te pobie
Uhder sISH) the bolice hes he uo- mo

T he has the 9laob

the feuce
 Tis foutn

Case Netyi dohyut hnde v.sali o Jakatadba

The Hton 'Ble Cout held a tat aeyplie plube call

infotu-alia
be theatd

Da the Case the inei det

aged
he

desttueln l evideuee
26 sane the at
 about cp. d). mut ee trealed ao FR ber,na
) ny kind info-
Condiioh
of ae care but ouly ebtain he
i) cotiobojative
l is

he

Ris wredble sthan any sle vtalaneul

Psumbtnen g delay daes
Joes mot giue amj
Saise

oe:-0 Muhamnad Asam v.

dabt
ade the
eUen

80eeUee ohe eme /feuee

Neu
Lestigalin is a jooeodau for enllrela evidenes
L

Tud. Hagistali.

noh

insatiyatln
154 (a) Cufoiteuda
ts39,3,36.
(Thegy ae
wlalre o s1563)

Panelaslat

V huiajoa Naia hmal (Briny Ceunil)

Coutt leld that
are

Thsy ate not sualatfig aud the eoudinalitu diidk

t aboust is
knandal dut ottuit is nst madstry
made al

must be toufleted oin9too hewise it kao lb

 e buf vague &entwut uto ae tat statd Koaa
He 7
(9G2) Samuel- Ksal
v.a Sali
lia, wiu
bite eueny nát its atshlel oitla Cout
uothee
it becawne
Coewstauees
deßluds it but as not
eittemtauce
at fanlula whehera judioaey
is eourt
hel4ulae Dould
questiou The
it RajHe
aithan 1469) .(AEl lngk Shiv V
Case
absut
R. taly S:154
3o
ases eee
Aucadaue,
-’TPe) 202 o, PSain
S39,40 31
 allali ol Asal
Risa guee fact

folaie
frl muot &e aegitoed
inoatigabn
Hasan Abdutak v. shata 1462)

Du ts cae, laleve ban bouu fcmidel iu s. isy, ir estebliled by

udleany albo hat ee
mandatoy The suttanee
as

ucomded slall be gine pee of cort.

Objlet
Cooboalie Ouly to iuitale he ceiinnal as i l
the motilu o to stat he invetatib
Hasib v. slalzo Bias

Hhe allgod ecminal aoevil soa

So as to wahe tt take Sutable
to s o
 Evidehuy value Cats :.
Shana Pam v. Stali o) alaaa
-)

) PUCon ded by tue þolte

value at e tuial bt.it
us nat asktaline fiee el evidewa. t the

under S- 157

1m evienee le malen
(holiee) and infoinat

wheteale o oubradiet astaleneut wade by

yoomant.. The
sabstaline ficee evaee
4 eieuastancss f
Hecase Rut it iS Ghe

Reansuae Selay'
Raba Rarind Rawinder Kunah w. tala o Fujab
tomat aingkv. Rakvinde Sint
Sals Hinaclal Pradel v. Gian cland
olal Badesk
v. Sali o Jaharaskla.(2006)
 FIR Hhe
attsibuk&l,
.No
cowlueuee giound
a te geond
is losgig ehand
thone a
Sian itel a
nát u be
thaleslere
ae ddley be
adeslv. cannot
eawesvedisa
delymat
Huyab. a itell
held Hinaclal
suel eoneaot dy
o Cauit the
St
v. csuit. Rao
kubasee aud lo that stala aaheb
efot
Ravimder it The
Cautt
eld
f o
hease te dionding
o amy ideliay
lauseany is
ease lolig
Serel
Lase
Da
e He (Eid
Da
(