Professional Documents
Culture Documents
عمر ولي
عمر ولي
Subject page
Acknowledgments iii
Abstract iv
Table of Contents V
List of Table Vii
Section one 1
1.1. Introduction 1
1.2. problem 3
1.3. Research question 3
1.4. The value of the study 4
1.5. proceduers of the study 4
1.6. Limits of the study 4
Swction Two 5
2.1. Introduction 5
2.2. Definition of genitive case 5
2.3. construction of genitive case 7
2.3.1. Morphological construction of genitive case 7
2.3.2. Semantic construction of genitive case 11
2.4. Subjective Genitive 12
2.5.Objective Genitive 13
2.6. Summary 15
Section Three 16
3.1. Intruduction 16
3.2. Possesive form of Noun 17
3.3. Genitive of pronoun 20
3.4. Genitive of Adjective 21
3.5. Summary 22
Section Four 23
Conclusions 23
Bibliography 24
List of Table
Table Page
Genitive with (S) in spoken and written forms 8
Section one
1.1. Introduction
English is one of the most commonly spoken and written languages in the
world right now. It is the primary language in more than in 71 countries, including
major world powers, such as America and the UK, and it taught as a second
language in many other countries because of it’s value as a tool for
communication.
The main problem that this study tries to solve the students confussion when
they use possessive. It also tries to provide them with a rich background about this
prominent subject.
The study also tries to focus on the way we use possessive in writing by
clearifyiug the position of a postrophe and the pronouns. I try to make all these
solutions clear and useful by including many examples and situations of everyday
speech.
1.2. Problem
The past studies in Genitive case showed that the students have problems in using
the a postrophe in the right place. The teachers noticed that their students do
mistakes when they put the a postrophe sometimes before and after (s) possessive.
However, two problems arised in the current study and noticed by teachers,
these problems are:
1. Students at many different stage are facing difficulties in differentiating between
(s) plaral and possessive.
2. The students also faced problems about the correct position of a postrophe. The
feeling confuses when they write the a postrophe either before or after (s).
The present study is helped to be significant for both students and English
teacher a like. This research sheds light on the important uses of genitive or
possessive in spoken and written language. This paper makes this area clear by
explaining who is the genitive constructed and expressed in English language. This
study is also value for the textbook designers because it shifts the important of
genitive and the problems that faced by the students in using genitive, so it will
open now horizons to deal with genitive and language communication.
The current paper has followed these steps in order to achieve the aims of the
study:
2. Presenting the forms of genitive, the correct usage of a postrohe with different
parts of speech such as nouns, pronouns and adjectives
3. Examples and explanations were provided in order to make it very clear and
easy
4. Summary for each section was presenting and also conclusion was finally
written to conclude this study.
2.1 Introduction
The section two of this study provided some definition of genitive case and
explained the construction through many cases. Many of genitive types are
founded, but this paper focus on some types that construction, genitive.
Morphological, semantics, subjective, objective and descriptive will be discussed
in this section.
The genitive typically expresses a possessive relation ship (e.g. the boy’s
book) or some other similarly ‘close’ connection (e.g. a summer’s day), but there is
a great deal of variation between language in the way this case is used. The
termmay also apply to constructions formally related to the case form, as in the
‘post modifying’ genitive with of in English. e.g. the car of the general (⇒ the
general’s car).
The genitive of regular nouns is realized in speech only in the singular, where
it takes one of the forms /IZ/, /Z/ or /S/ following the rules for the sinflection of
nouns and verbs. In writing, the inlection of regular nouns is realized in the
singular by apostrophes (boy’s), and in the regular plural by the apostrophe
following the plural-s (boy’s). As are sult, the spoken form/ spdIz/ my three forms
of the noun spy as follows:
e.g. (1)
The spies were arrested [plural, common case].
The syp’s companion was a woman [ singular, genitive case].
The spie’s companion were women [plural, genitive case].
Since the genitive adds nothing to aregular plural noun in speech, and nothing
except the final a postroph in writing, this plural genitive may be called zero
genitive.
By contrast, some nouns with irregular plural like child preserve a number
distinction independently of the genitive singular and genitive plural distinction.
Child ⇒ Child’s ; Children ⇒ Children’s
With such irregular plurals shows, the some genitive ending (splled’s occurs with
both singular and plural nouns.
The following table explains those points.
Table 1
Genitive with (s) in spoken and written forms.
Table 1 shows the using of (s) singular and plural in both regular and irregular
forms of genitive spoken and written point of views.
Eckersley (1960:45):
(i) For singular nouns, by adding-’s to the modifying noun.The usual ending for the
old English genitive singular was-es.When, later-the-e was omitted, its obsense
was shown by an apostrophe (ʼ)
Phonological, the’s has three allomorphs according to the sound at the end of
the preceding noun.
(Eckersely and Eckersley 1960:45)
/s/ with nouns ending in voiceless consonant (except) /s/, /S/ and /tS/. e.g. mark’s,
elephant’s, philip’s.
/Z/ with nouns ending in /s/, /Z/, /3/,/S/,/d3/ and /tS/, e.g. marx’s, George’s,
which’s.
Ouirk (197 2:193 ) discuss the classes of genitive in English on the following
lines, anattempt will be made to explain the classes which are relevant to the
experiment which are the subjective and objective genitive.
Objective Genitive:
The boyʼs teacher the boy is tought by the teacher the apostrophe (s’) is added
to the noun reffering to the thing affected by the performer of the action.
e.g. (5)
(cobuild:1990:104 )
According to this example, the apostrophe (‘s) which added to the word (mons) to
explain that the man affected by the action (killing)
2.4. Subjective Genitive
The modifying noun acts as the subject of the head noun. Bolinger and sears
(1981:67.8) explain this as follow. “Jill’s book uses the possessive morpheme’s to
discribe owhership, a fact of the real world. Jill’s smoking doesnot use it to say that
Jill is the grammatical subject of the verb smoke”. This is supported by Cobuild’s
(1990:104 ) who stated that “the possessive form can some times be used with
nouns which reffer to an action inorder to indicate who or what is performing the
action”. Periphrasstic genitives can also be used to show the subject. “prepositional
phrases beginning with of can be used with nouns reffering to an action to indicate
who or what is performing the action” e.g. (6)
a) the man’s arrival.
b) my agreement leaves.
What is noticable about these examples is that the head noun is a verbal noun
and the modifying noun acts as its subject.
Consider the following sentences:
- The boyʼs application ++ the boy applied for....
The possessive morpheme’s shows that the boy is the grammatical subject of
the verb ‘apply’ it does not show the ownership.
The boyʼs book.
The following possessive morpheme’s describes the status of owner ship. The boy
has the book.
2.5. Objecive Genitive
The modifying noun acts as the object of the head noun. Cobuild (1990:104 )
reveal that “some times you can add apostrophes (‘s) to anoun reffering to the
thing affected by the performer of an action and put it in front of the noun reffering
to that performer. Some times an apostrophes (‘s) structure can be used to indicate
the thing affected by an action. “prepositional phrases beginning with of can also
be employed to show who or what some does some thing to (ibid:130 ).e.g
d- Mandela’s release.
It can be observed that the head noun is an agent but it is a verbal noun.
What represents the objective construction in which the head noun is an active
particaple that resembles the imperfective verb in its indication to the present and
future and the modifying noun is its patient, as in e.g.(8)
The English genitive morpheme has three allomorphs that are phonologically
conditioned thus, the morphological identifying feature of an nouns is that they
have a genitive or possessive form.
Quirk etal. (1985:321 ) declare that the meaning expressed by the genitive can
best be shown by sentential pr phrasal an alogues.
Section Three
3.1. Introduction
This section discusses different aspects concerning genitive. Firstly it sheds light
on “possessive from of noun”. The noun possessive morpheme has been
investegated with reference to its phonological conditions. Many examples are
introduced to prove the matters that are discussed.
Genitive of adjective is presented with in this section with examples showing the
way they are used.
Genitive of pronoun is also dealt with in this section provided with examples.
The ambiguious areas of genitive are also refered to with in each branch of this
section.
A noun Possessive is ambiguous when it expresses more than one of the above
relation ships at the same time e.g. “His son’s loss grieved him” has two meaning:
(1) He lost his son (object of underlying verb), and this grieved him; or (2) His son
(subject of underlying verb) lost some thing, pehaps a family heir loon, and this
grieved him.
Quirk (1972:192 -201 ) listed the following animate noun classes as normally
taking the inflected genitive:
(a) person names: clinaton’s scandal
(b) personal nouns: the girl’s new doll.
(c) cllective nouns: the army’s maneuvers.
(d) Higher animals: the dog’s tail.
Quirk (197 2:192 -201 ) also listed the following kinds of in animate nouns as
taking the inflected genitive.
(e) Geographical names: continents: Africa’s treasure countries: china’s
mounments.
States: pennsylvania’s governor.
Cities/towns: cairo’s delta.
Universities: oxford’s linguistics department.
(f) Locative nouns: They denote regions, institutions, heavenly bodies, etc. They
can be very similar to geographical names asin:
The moon’s surface
A country’s population.
(g) Temporal nouns: The week’s events
yesterday’s work.
(h) Nouns of special in terst to human activity: They denote parts of the body,
cultural activities, means of transport, etc. asin: The mind’s development.
The game’s history.
The ship’s deck.
Green baum and Nelson (2002:200-201 ) pointed out that certain indefinite
pronouns have a genitive ending in (s). These are “one compound sending in-one”
(some one) and “compounds ending in body” (some body).
e.g. (10) one’s friend some one’s more any body’s idea
The indefinite pronoun (other) follows the general rule for nouns; the genitive
singular is (other’s) and the genitive plural (other’s).
e.g. (13) each other’s letters.
(14) the other’s problems (the problems of the others)
East wood (1994:213 ) says that Possessive pronoun ending in (s) should not have
apostrophe like (mine, your, his, hers, ours and theirs).
e.g. (15) the book is mine.
There are Possessive determiners like (my, your, his, her, its and their).
e.g. (16) it’s my book.
Gilders leeve and lodge’s traditional ‘adjectival’ labal all uded to above
semms tabe intended to capture there following: The genitive marks attributive
nouns: Gilders leeve and lodge (and others) provided detailed attempts at
classification of attributive. John’s ideas (e.g. John has ideas). The latin attributive.
genitive is on this view a "minimal" morphological cases signalling
"attributiveness" rather than some positive semantic relation.
They point to the adjectival forms used for first and second person
"possession"
e.g. friend: GEN. SG my/your : NOM. SG
The genitive here again marks attributive formation. And, again it can be
interpreted, in this respect, as the minimal case. Thus the relation between the
genitive and preceding noun in amor can be merely one of attribution; the
ambiguity (experiencer or absolutive) reflects alternative realizations of the correct
argument structure of the base verbs not the purely nominal relation marked by the
genitive.
3.5. Summary
In the Possessive form of noun, the Possessive morpheme [-sps] has the same
phonologically conditioned allomorphs as the plural: /-s/, /-z/, and /-dz/.
A noun Possessive is ambiguous when it expresses more than one relation
ship at the same time.
Certain indefinite pronoun have a genitive ending in s. These are compounds
ending in one (some one) and compoundending in body (some body)
There are Possessive determiners like (my, your, his, her, its and their).
The status of adjectives in genitive construction since no thing can interven
between the members of a construct, all attributive adjective describing either
member must follow the construct.
Section Four
Conclusion
The genitive case is one of the prominent pheromena has two forms inflected
and periphrastic. Preposition can be used to express the genitive in English
constructions formally related to the case form, as in the past-modifying genitive
with of English e.g. the car of the general (= the general’s car). The genitive
considered a morphological porperty of nouns in English.
In genitive case double genitive are post-nominal genitive phrases which are
marked with preposition of. The s-genitive and of construction is a similarity of
function and meaning between the two constructions. In genitive of pronouns have
a genitive ending in (’s) these are one compounds ending (some one) and
compounds ending in body (some body), while in genitive of nouns are divided
into singular nouns, plural nouns and Possessive nouns.
Bibliography:
Allerton, D. & French, M. (1987) Morphology: The forms of English language. ed.
by W.F Bolton and David Crystal. London: Sphere Books.
Bolinger, Dwight & Sears. Donald (1981) Aspect of language 3rd ed. New York:
Harconrt Brace Jovanovich.
Quirk, R., Green baum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvich, J. (1985) A comprehensive
Grammar of the English language. London: Long man.
Quirk, et. al. (1972) A Grammar of Contemporary English.
Quirk R. (1950) A comrehensive English Grammar.
Thomson, A.J. and Martinet, A.V. (1986) practical English Grammar. Oxford:
Qxford University press.