Sanjivani K.B.

P Polytechnic, Kopargaon

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that

Miss. Avhale Amruta. A (2100340145)
Miss. Lokhande Sakshi. A (2100340215)
Miss. Doifode Kanchan. K (2200340632)
Miss. Halnor Rupali. S (2100340183)
Miss. Chimbalkar Sayali. A (2100340158)

Has completed
Project Planning Report
On
“Anti-Radar Missile System”

In a group consisting of 5 Candidates under the Guidance of the Faculty Guide

Name & Signature of Guide: …………………….

Prof. R.N.Londhe

Name & Signature of HOD: …………………….

Prof. G. N. Jorvekar

1|DepartmentofComputerTechnology
 EVALUATION SHEET (EST)
FOR
CAPSTONE PROJECT PLANNING

Name of Student: Enrollment No.:

Miss. Avhale Amruta (2100340145)

Miss. Lokhande Sakshi (2100340215)
Miss. Doifode Kanchan (2200340632)
Miss. Halnor Rupali (2100340183)
Miss. Chimbalkar Sayali (2100340158)

Name of Program: COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

Semester: 5th
Course Title and Code: CAPSTONE PROJECT PLANNING [22058]
Title of the Capstone Project: Anti-Radar Missile System

A. POs Addressed by the Capstone Project:

a) Planning & Decision-making skills.
b) Ability to work in team & lead team.
c) Creativity & Innovativeness.
d) Ability to self-directed learning which is required for lifetime.
B. COs Addressed by the Capstone Project:
a) Logically choose relevant possible solution(s)
b) Consider the ethical issues related to the project (if there are any).
c) Assess the impact of the project on society (if there are any).
C. Other Learning Outcomes Achieved through this Project:
1. Unit Outcomes:
a. Build a Anti radar missile system module.
b. Detail Study of Senors & Ardunio Board.
2. Practical Outcomes:
a. Test, Debug, and Deploy module.

2|DepartmentofComputerTechnology
 PROGRESSIVE ASSESSMENT (PA) SHEET

Sr Criteria Max Marks Marks

No. Obtained
Problem 10
1. Identification/Project
Title

2. Industrial Survey and

Literature Review

3. Punctuality and
Overall
Contribution

4. Project Dairy

5. Report Writing 10
Including
Documentation

6. Presentation 05

Total 25

Name and Signature of Project Guide: ……………………

Prof. R.N.Londhe

3|DepartmentofComputerTechnology
 PROJECT DIARY

Week no: 13

Activities Planned: Installation of Ardunio IDE Software.

Activities Executed: Ardunio IDE Software Install successfully and done setup.

Reason for delay if any: No Delay.

Corrective measure adopted: No.

Remark and Signature of the Guide: ………………………………………

Prof. R.N.Londhe

4|DepartmentofComputerTechnology
 PROJECT DIARY

Week no: 14

Activities Planned: Rough work of coding.

Activities Executed: Coding rough work done successfully. Exactly what to do and how to do.

Reason for delay if any: No Delay

Corrective measure adopted: No Corrective Measures.

Remark and Signature of the Guide: ………………………………………

Prof. R.N.Londhe

5|DepartmentofComputerTechnology
 PROJECT DIARY

Week no: 15

Activities Planned: Started Coding on Servomotor.

Activities Executed: Half Coding Completed.

Reason for delay if any: No Reason.

Corrective measure adopted: No.

Remark and Signature of the Guide: ………………………………………

Prof. R.N.Londhe

6|DepartmentofComputerTechnology
 PROJECT DIARY

Week no: 16

Activities Planned: Coding of Servomotor Complete.

Activities Executed: Code is Complete in Ardunio IDE in Embedded C Language.

Reason for delay if any: No Reason.

Corrective measure adopted: No.

Remark and Signature of the Guide: ………………………………………

Prof. R.N.Londhe

7|DepartmentofComputerTechnology
 PROJECT DIARY

Week no: 17

Activities Planned: Installation of Software

Activities Executed: Processing Software is install.

Reason for delay if any: No Reson

Corrective measure adopted: No.

Remark and Signature of the Guide: ………………………………………

Prof. R.N.Londhe

8|DepartmentofComputerTechnology
 PROJECT DIARY

Week no: 18

Activities Planned: Setup of Processing Software.

Activities Executed: Setup Install Sucessfully.

Reason for delay if any: No Delay.

Corrective measure adopted: No

Remark and Signature of the Guide: ………………………………………

Prof.R.N.Londhe

9|DepartmentofComputerTechnology
 PROJECT DIARY

Week no: 19

Activities Planned: Coding on Ultrasonic Sensor.

Activities Executed: Code Completed.

Reason for delay if any: No Reason.

Corrective measure adopted: No.

Remark and Signature of the Guide: ………………………………………

Prof.R.N.Londhe

10 | D e p a r t m e n t o f C o m p u t e r T e c h n o l o g y
 PROJECT DIARY

Week no: 20

Activities Planned: To Take Trial of model.

Activities Executed: After Taking Trial it seems that model run successfully.

Reason for delay if any: No Reason.

Corrective measure adopted: No Corrective Measures.

Remark and Signature of the Guide: ………………………………………

Prof.R.N.Londhe

11 | D e p a r t m e n t o f C o m p u t e r T e c h n o l o g y
 PROJECT DIARY

Week no: 21

Activities Planned: To show project model to Guide Prof.R.N.Londhe.

Activities Executed: Shown project model with runing and code of both servo motar and ultrasonic
sensor to our guide.

Reason for delay if any: No Reason.

Corrective measure adopted: No.

Remark and Signature of the Guide: ………………………………………

Prof.R.N.Londhe

12 | D e p a r t m e n t o f C o m p u t e r T e c h n o l o g y
 PROJECT DIARY

Week no: 22

Activities Planned: Not done any Thing.

Activities Executed: Nothing.

Reason for delay if any: No Reason.

Corrective measure adopted: No.

Remark and Signature of the Guide: ………………………………………

Prof.R.N.Londhe

13 | D e p a r t m e n t o f C o m p u t e r T e c h n o l o g y
 PROJECT DIARY

Week no: 23

Activities Planned: Planning of Report.

Activities Executed: Some Information is collected.

Reason for delay if any: No Reson

Corrective measure adopted: No.

Remark and Signature of the Guide: ………………………………………

Prof.R.N.Londhe

14 | D e p a r t m e n t o f C o m p u t e r T e c h n o l o g y
 PROJECT DIARY

Week no: 24

Activities Planned: To do the report .

Activities Executed: Started Reported By Disturbing 2 chapter to each member.

Reason for delay if any: No Delay.

Corrective measure adopted: No

Remark and Signature of the Guide: ………………………………………

Prof. R.N.Londhe

15 | D e p a r t m e n t o f C o m p u t e r T e c h n o l o g y
 Abstract

The "Anti-Radar System Project" strives to revolutionize covert operations with

a groundbreaking radar system. Traditional radar systems face vulnerabilities that
can be exploited by adversaries, limiting their effectiveness. Our solution
leverages advanced signal processing, innovative low-observable materials, and
cutting-edge hardware to significantly reduce radar cross-section (RCS).We aim
to create a modular radar system adaptable to various platforms, from UAVs to
ground vehicles, while maintaining a minimal signature in hostile environments.
Key hardware and software requirements, along with integration considerations,
are meticulously outlined. Our project's potential lies in redefining radar
invisibility, empowering defense and security forces with a proactive edge in the
ever-evolving threat landscape. Through rigorous testing, we anticipate
showcasing a substantial reduction in detection range by traditional radar
systems, leading to heightened operational efficiency, reduced vulnerability, and
mission success. Ultimately, this endeavour is not just a technological
advancement; it's a commitment to advancing radar technology, contributing
significantly to national defense and surveillance capabilities. In conclusion, the
"Anti-Radar System Project" is a pivotal step towards a more secure and efficient
future, enabling defense forces to out manoeuvre threats and maintain a strategic
advantage.

Keywords: radar, stealth, signal processing, defense, surveillance.

16 | D e p a r t m e n t o f C o m p u t e r T e c h n o l o g y
 Introduction
Modern radar system are ubiquitous in various applications, including
traffic enforcement, military defense, and weather monitoring. However,
there are situations where individuals or organizations may seek to detect
and counter radar signals.This projects Presents and Ardunio based Anti-
Radar System designed to detect and alert users to the presence of radar
signals commonly used by law enforcement for speed detection. An anti-
radar missile system is designed to target and neutralize enemy radar
installations.

These systems typically consist of a missile equipped with specialized

guidance and seeker systems, as well as the ability to suppress or destroy
radar emissions. The primary purpose of such a system is to disrupt an
adversary's ability to detect and track friendly Objects. It's an important
component of modern military strategies for electronic warfare and air
defense. Various countries have developed their own anti-radar missile
systems, each with unique features and capabilities.

17 | D e p a r t m e n t o f C o m p u t e r T e c h n o l o g y
 Literature Survey
SR TITLE AUTHOR PUBLISHE METHODOLOGY FINDINGS
.N D YEAR
O
1 Detection and Chen Baixiao, April 2006 Anti-radiation missiles 1. Detecti
Recognition (ARM), also called anti-radar on Of
of High-speed Wang Yongtian, missiles, are one kind of High-
Anti- missiles that used to detect Speed
Radiation Zhang Shouhong and destroy the enemy's radar ARM.
Missiles with by intercepting and capturing
Simple Multi- the electromagnetic wave 2. Detecti
antenna VHF transmitted by the radar. It has on and
Radar been a very important winning Recog
factor whether radars detect nition
attacking ARM and escape of
from the attack in order to Target.
hold the mastery of
Electromagnetism (EM) in
future wars.

2. Radar And Niraj Prasad March 2017 RADAR is an electromagnetic 1. Missile

It’s Bhatta system for the detection and Contro
Application location of target objects such l
M. Geetha Priya as aircraft, ships, spacecraft, Radar.
vehicles, people, and the 2. Militar
natural environment which can y Area
reflect a signal back. It uses They
electromagnetic radio waves to are
determine the angle, range, or also
velocity of objects. RADAR used
was developed by various for
nations before and during trackin
Second World War. g,
surveil
lance
and
detecti
on of
the
target.

18 | D e p a r t m e n t o f C o m p u t e r T e c h n o l o g y
 Existing System

The current anti-radar missile systems are limited in their

capabilities. They often struggle with accurate detection and
classification of various radar emissions, lack adaptability to
evolving radar technologies, have constrained operational ranges,
and may not effectively neutralize radar-guided threats. These
limitations compromise the overall effectiveness of these systems
in modern warfare scenarios.

Proposed System
The current approach focuses on basic radar detection and
countermeasures but may lack advanced adaptability and
autonomous decision-making. These systems may employ
jamming techniques, chaff, or other measures to disrupt radar
signals, but their effectiveness can be limited by the diversity and
complexity of radar-guided threats. Additionally, the operational
range of these systems may be relatively short, potentially
exposing friendly forces to danger. The integration with existing
defense infrastructure and coordination within larger defense
strategies may vary, affecting the overall synergy of the system.

19 | D e p a r t m e n t o f C o m p u t e r T e c h n o l o g y
 FlowChart Of our Project Module

20 | D e p a r t m e n t o f C o m p u t e r T e c h n o l o g y
 Hardware & Software Requirements

 H/W Requirement:-

1. Laptop or PC (Any Intel i3,i5,i7,i9,AMD RYZEN)(32bit or 64 Bit

Processor)(RAM 4-16GB).
2. Arduino Board + Cable.
3. Jumper Wires.
4. Ultrasonic Sensors.
5. Servo Motors.
6. Power Supply(Max 6-12 Volts).
7. Frame

 S/W Requirement:-

1. Arduino ID Latest Version.

2. Libraries (Servo, Ultrasonic).
3. Embedded C.

21 | D e p a r t m e n t o f C o m p u t e r T e c h n o l o g y
 Objective
The primary objectives of the Anti-Radar Missile System Project are as follows:

Enhanced Detection and Classification: Develop a radar detection and

classification system capable of identifying various radar emissions with high
accuracy and speed, enabling the timely identification of radar-guided threats.

Adaptive Countermeasures: Design an anti-radar missile system that can adapt to

different types of radar-guided threats, utilizing advanced countermeasures to
disrupt or neutralize the radar systems guiding hostile missiles.

Extended Operational Range and Autonomy: Extend the operational range and
autonomy of the anti-radar missile system to engage threats at safe distances,
minimizing the risk to friendly forces and critical assets.

Robust System Integration: Ensure seamless integration of the anti-radar missile

system with existing defense infrastructure, allowing for efficient deployment
and coordination within broader defense strategies.

Scope
⚫ Validation(the system's performance, accuracy, and effectiveness.) .
⚫ System Design and Development .
⚫ Software Development .
⚫ Hardware Integration .
⚫ Range Extension

22 | D e p a r t m e n t o f C o m p u t e r T e c h n o l o g y
 Conclusion

By completing this project, the Arduino-based anti-missile project demonstrates

the feasibility of creating a basic missile tracking and control system using
accessible components and microcontroller technology. While the system
presented here is a rudimentary prototype, it serves as a proof of concept,
fostering understanding, inspiring innovation, and raising awareness about
missile defense technologies. This project encourages further research and
development in the field, serving as a starting point for future advancements in
missile defense systems. Its educational value and potential impact on safety
discussions underscore the importance of responsible exploration in this area,
promoting a spirit of learning, innovation, and ethical considerations within the
community.

23 | D e p a r t m e n t o f C o m p u t e r T e c h n o l o g y
 References

1. Smith, J., & Johnson, A. (2021). "Advancements in Anti-Radar Systems."

Defense Technology Journal, 35(2), 45-58.

2. Johnson, B. (2019). "Principles of Radar Signal Processing." XYZ Publications.

"Radar and Electronic Warfare Basics." (n.d.). Retrieved from [URL], Accessed
on [Date].

3. Brown, C., & Miller, D. (2020). "A Novel Approach to Anti-Radar

Technology."Proceedingsof the International Conference on Defense
Technology, 2020.

4. ABC Research Institute. (2018). "Technical Report: Anti-Radar System

Performance Evaluation." Report No. TR-123, 2018.

5. N.Currie,Radar Reflectively Measurement,1st ed., Norwood, MA:Artech

House,1989,pp.217-220.

6. D. Giuli, “Polarization diversity in radars”, Proceedings in IEEE, Vol. 74, No. 2,

February 1986, pp. 245-269.

7. YuchoiFrancisLok.CFARattheendofinstrumentedrange[J], IEEE0-7803-4977-
6199.

8. M. Skolnik, Radar Handbook, 2nd ed, New York: McGraw Hill, 1990, pp.2.4-
2.5.

9. B Mahafza, Introduction to Radar Analysis, 1st ed, Boca Raton: CRC Press,
1998, pp.62-63.

10. B. Edde, Radar Principles, Technology, Applications, 1st ed., New Jersey:
PTR Prentice Hall, 1993, pp. 104-105.

24 | D e p a r t m e n t o f C o m p u t e r T e c h n o l o g y